ArticlePDF Available

Long-Term Acute Care: Where Does It Fit in the Health Care Continuum?

Authors:
Commentary
LONG-TERM ACUTE CARE:
WHERE DOES IT FIT IN THE
HEALTH CARE CONTINUUM?
By Taryn Miller, RN, DNP, NEA-BC, Christina Canfield, RN, MSN, ACNS-BC, CCRN-E, Thomas Buckingham,
RN, BSN, MBA, Gary Johnston, RN, MSN, FNP-C, CCRN-K, Samuel Hammerman, MD, MMM, CPE, Gloria
Skinner, RN, MSN, and John Tote, RN, MSN, CCRN
As technological advancements have been
introduced into the intensive care
environment, the volume of patients
surviving the acute illness or trauma
phase has increased. Many of these
patients become chronically critically ill. Chronic
critical illness, a term first used in 1985, refers to
the subset of patients requiring prolonged mechani-
cal ventilation, those who experience multisystem
organ failure, and those patients referred to as the
“damaged survivors of critical care.”1 In addition to
their multiple organ system failures, these patients
experience profound muscle weakness, debilitation
and require periods of prolonged recovery. Recovery
of the chronically critically ill has been described
as slow; occurring over weeks or months.2
Care of this population requires a skill set that
blends critical care expertise with rehabilitation.
The need for acute nursing and medical care extends
significantly beyond the expected length of stay as
seen in a traditional hospital environment. Extended
acute care may be provided in specialized hospitals
called long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs). Long-
term acute care hospitals specialize in the care of
high acuity patients who become chronically criti-
cally ill and require medical treatment beyond the
normal length of stay in a short-stay acute care
hospital and beyond the scope of practice of inpa-
tient rehabilitation or skilled nursing facilities.2
Background
Long-term acute care hospitals were formally
established in the 1980s, and are defined by the US
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as
acute care hospitals with an average length of stay
greater than 25 days.3 The Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services also requires patients transi-
tioning to LTACHs to have spent 3 or more days in
an intensive care unit (ICU) immediately preced-
ing their admission or to have required mechanical
ventilation for more than 96 hours. These hospitals
may be located within the walls of a short-term
acute care hospital or they can be a free-standing
facility. An LTACH is a fully functioning acute
care hospital, not a skilled nursing facility or an
inpatient rehabilitation facility. Categorized as a
postacute care facility, an LTACH provides care for
patients with higher acuity needs than an inpatient
rehabilitation facility or skilled nursing facility.
Within the postacute care provider category, LTACHs
provide the highest level of clinical expertise and
require the greatest use of human and equipment
resources in the provision of care to this fragile
patient population. Improved outcomes may be
related to the LTACHs’ multidisciplinary approach
to care, which includes physicians, nurses, respira-
tory therapists, physical therapists, pharmacists, dieti-
cians, and case managers.5
Care provided at an LTACH focuses on contin-
ued medical stabilization, management of critical
infusions, optimizing respiratory status, and facilita-
tion of functional recovery. Consideration for trans-
fer to an LTACH should occur early in a critically
ill patient’s ICU stay to afford the patient the opti-
mal chance for recovery. Of note, access to many
of the same services as a short-term acute care
hospital, such as hemodialysis, radiology, and lab-
oratory services, allows for the continued intense
level of care these patients require. A smoother
©2016 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2016766
364 AJCC AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, July 2016, Volume 25, No. 4 www.ajcconline.org
by AACN on December 12, 2017http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from
The ultimate goal in caring for these patients
is the restoration of normal function.
transition of care, avoidance of delays in discharge,
and enhanced utilization of ICU resources are
advantages of early LTACH identification.5 More
than one-third of the 5 million patients admitted
to ICUs every year will require mechanical ventila-
tion and up to 25% of these patients will require
ventilation beyond 7 days with subsequent trache-
ostomy placement.6 LTACHs provide highly special-
ized evidence-based care intended to improve
long-term outcomes for these patients and offer the
ideal environment for development and implemen-
tation of specialized strategies for liberation from
prolonged mechanical ventilation. Collaboration
among the interdisciplinary team focuses on decreas-
ing the potential for ventilator-associated events,
improving progressive mobility, preventing infec-
tion, maintaining adequate nutrition, and enhanc-
ing communication and strategic weaning strategies.
Identification of Patients
Patients are identified for transfer to an LTACH
through a comprehensive referral process. Although
patients are frequently referred directly out of the
ICU, they may also transfer from a step-down or
complex medical-surgical setting. Physicians and
case managers identify patients who will benefit
from an LTACH stay before transitioning them to a
lower level of care. Patients requiring acute dialysis,
liberation from mechanical ventilation, complex
wound management, management of 1 or more
infectious disease processes, and those who require
frequent administration or adjustment of intrave-
nous medications may all be eligible for admission
to an LTACH. Clinical liaisons, skilled in the
assessment of chronically critically ill patients, work
with the short-term acute care hospital’s case man-
agement team to coordinate the admission and
assure continuity of care between settings. Handoff
occurs between physicians, advanced practice nurses,
bedside nurses, and respiratory therapists prior to
patient transfer.
Patients requiring intense or frequent nursing
care and assessments may be placed in a high
observation or special care unit within the facility,
and lower acuity patients may be placed in a
medical-surgical unit. The clinical team is geared
toward the management and clinical resolution of
the chronically critically ill patient’s complex medi-
cal issues. Interventions are carefully considered
for possible unintended negative consequences.
The LTACH environment provides adequate tech-
nology to assess and sustain care (eg, ventilators,
electrocardiogram monitors, intravenous equipment).
This is coupled with careful, coordinated attention
and intervention by clinicians with specialized skills.
The ultimate goal in caring for these patients is the
restoration of normal function with an emphasis
on mobility and weight bearing, effective nutrition,
management of current organ dysfunction, and pre-
vention of additional complications.
Interventions Provided
Interventions such as central venous catheter
insertion, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
tube insertion, bronchoscopy, or colonoscopy may
also be performed in an LTACH. Additionally,
LTACHs are equipped to manage acute physiologic
decompensation such as respiratory failure, sepsis,
and acute pulmonary edema. Patients experiencing
an acute decompensation may be transferred to a
higher level of care within the facility for more
intense management. Clinicians at LTACHs are
skilled at endotracheal intubation and management
of rapid response calls and cardiopulmonary arrest.
LTACHs do not provide therapies such as percuta-
neous coronary intervention or extracorporeal
membrane oxygenation. Patients requiring these
therapies are transferred back to a short-term acute
care hospital.
Many LTACHs maintain an affiliation or connec-
tion with providers at short-term acute care hospitals.
This affiliation allows for continuity of care and
exchange of key patient information. The relation-
ship may be maintained via dual privileging of phy-
sicians and midlevel providers or through a shared
medical record. Physicians assess the patients’ prog-
ress daily and adjust their treatment plan accordingly.
About the Authors
Taryn Miller is clinical leadership development special-
ist, Thomas Buckingham is executive vice president,
Gary Johnston is regional chief nursing officer, Samuel
Hammerman, is chief medical officer, and Gloria Skinner
is senior vice president and chief nursing officer at Select
Medical, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. Christina Canfield
is clinical program manager and John Tote is nurse man-
ager, eHospital, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Ohio.
Corresponding author: Taryn Miller, RN, DNP, NEA-BC, clinical
leadership development specialist, LTACH division, Select
Medical, 4714 Gettysburg Road, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055
(tarymiller@selectmedical.com).
www.ajcconline.org AJCC AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, July 2016, Volume 25, No. 4 365
by AACN on December 12, 2017http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from
skillful therapeutic communication. Patients and
their families are often hesitant to leave the ICU
environment and require much reassurance that
their needs will be met during the LTACH stay.
Goals of care are set with patients and their families
during care conferences held with the interdisciplin-
ary team at the beginning of their stay. Care confer-
ences allow the clinical team, the patient, and the
family to collaborate on care delivery and also allow
the patient and their family to express their prefer-
ence and desire for a discharge plan. The goals of
LTACH must frequently be reinforced. Physical ther-
apy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy con-
tribute significantly in the LTACH setting to the
patient’s progression, however there is no defined
amount of time that they must be able to participate
in therapy sessions. Therapy interventions are fluid
and dependent upon close collaboration with the
medical, nursing, and respiratory teams. The therapy
plan is decided based upon the daily assessment
and the patient’s medical condition. Collaboration,
cooperation, and communication are intrinsic to
the patient’s outcome in the LTACH space.
The interdisciplinary team continuously eval-
uates patient progress and develops a plan for the
next transition in care. This plan for transition is
generated collaboratively with patients and their
families while considering the available and/or
required resources. Whereas some patients may be
discharged home from an LTACH, many will tran-
sition to inpatient rehabilitation, skilled nursing,
or hospice care. The decision to transfer to the next
level of care is based on the patient’s medical sta-
bility and potential for rehabilitation. In contrast
to LTACHs, inpatient rehabilitation facilities have a
therapy driven model in which the patients must be
able to tolerate 3 hours of therapy at a minimum.
Focused on Return to Normalcy
The successful recovery of a critically ill patient
is defined by the entire episode of care and thus
the transition of patients who are chronically criti-
cally ill out of the intensive care environment to an
LTACH once they have reached the end of the acute
phase of their illness is an important step in their
healing. The LTACH environment, with a focus on
the patient’s return to normalcy through the imple-
mentation of evidence-based protocols, has produced
positive patient outcomes.
Highly skilled clinicians, who comprise the inter-
disciplinary team, work closely together on a treatment
The nurse is an integral member
of the interdisciplinary team.
Consultations for specialty physicians, such as, but
not limited to, pulmonologists, infectious disease
experts, nephrologists, gastroenterologists, urologists,
cardiologists, and neurologists are also available.
Advancements in telemedicine further connect pro-
viders at referring hospitals to their patients and
allow for virtual consults and, at times, assessment
and management of care.
The Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Team
A care environment and clinical team geared
to the management and clinical resolution of these
issues as a group, such as that provided in an
LTACH, is essential for returning the patient to true
recovery. This patient population is very fragile, so
every intervention must be carefully considered
for possible unintended negative consequences.
The environment must provide adequate technol-
ogy to sustain care and carefully coordinated atten-
tion and intervention by clinicians with specialized
skills. To reiterate, the goal in caring for these
patients must be the restoration of normal function
with emphasis on mobility and weight bearing,
effective nutrition, management of current organ
dysfunction and prevention of additional compli-
cations. This is difficult to achieve in the modern
ICU, which is geared toward technology and inter-
ventions that limit mobility, and which does not
have clinicians with specialized knowledge of this
phase of critical illness. Once more, transfer to a
more specialized environment such as an LTACH,
can decrease anxiety and delirium, promote sleep,
and possibly ameliorate future cognitive impair-
ment and posttraumatic stress disorder.
Nurses who work at LTACHs must demonstrate
a high degree of competence in caring for patients
with multiple complex medical problems. Nurses
maintain Acute Cardiac Life Support certification
and many also hold certification as Critical Care
Registered Nurses. Advanced training in the imme-
diate management and stabilization of critically ill
patients may be provided; Fundamentals of Critical
Care Support training may be offered to nurses, as
well. The nurse is an integral member of the interdis-
ciplinary team and actively participates in developing,
implementing and evaluating the individualized
and continuing care plan for each patient.
Caring for patients and their families who have
experienced an unexpected prolonged hospital stay
presents its own unique set of challenges and nurs-
ing care of the patient admitted to an LTACH involves
366 AJCC AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, July 2016, Volume 25, No. 4 www.ajcconline.org
by AACN on December 12, 2017http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from
plan that encompasses the patients’ and families’
goals for healing. Unlike inpatient rehabilitation
facilities and skilled nursing facilities, the care
provided at an LTACH is driven by their continued
acute medical needs. LTACHs provide high quality
care to the chronically critically ill patient popula-
tion and will continue to partner with ICUs to
assure these patients are transitioning seamlessly
to the best level of care possible, helping to ensure
successful clinical outcomes.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
None reported.
eLetters
Now that you’ve read the article, create or contribute to an
online discussion on this topic. Visit www.ajcconline.org
and click “Submit a response” in either the full-text or PDF
view of the article.
REFERENCES
1. Girard K, Raffin TA. The chronically critically ill: to save or
let die? Respir Care. 1985;30:328-347.
2. MacIntyre N. Chronic critical illness: the growing challenge
to health care. 49th Respiratory Care Journal Conference,
“The Chronically Critically Ill Patient,” September 2011,
Florida. Respir Care. [serial online]. 2012;57(6):1021-1027.
3. Kahn JM, Barnato AE, Lave JR, et al. A comparison of free-
standing versus co-located long-term acute care hospitals.
PLoS One. 10(10):e0139742. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139742.
4. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Long-term
hospital PPS. April 16, 2013. Available at https://www.cms
.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/LongTerm-
CareHospitalPPS/index.html. Accessed November 10, 2015.
5. Szubski C, Tellez A, Barsoum W, et al. Predicting discharge
to a long-term acute care hospital after admission to an
intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care. 2014;23(4):e46-e53.
6. Critical care statistics. Society of Critical Care Medicine. http://
www.sccm.org/Communications/Pages/CriticalCareStats.aspx.
Accessed March 2, 2016.
To purchase electronic or print reprints, contact American
Association of Critical-Care Nurses, 101 Columbia, Aliso
Viejo, CA 92656. Phone, (800) 899-1712 or (949) 362-2050
(ext 532); fax, (949) 362-2049; e-mail, reprints@aacn.org.
www.ajcconline.org
by AACN on December 12, 2017http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from
Skinner and John Tote
Taryn Miller, Christina Canfield, Thomas Buckingham, Gary Johnston, Samuel Hammerman, Gloria
Long-Term Acute Care: Where Does It Fit in the Health Care Continuum?
http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/Published online
©2016 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
10.4037/ajcc2016766 364-367 25 2016;Am J Crit Care
http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/cgi/external_ref?link_type=PERMISSIONDIRECT
Personal use only. For copyright permission information:
http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/subscriptions/
Subscription Information
http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/misc/ifora.xhtml
Information for authors
http://www.editorialmanager.com/ajcc
Submit a manuscript
http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/subscriptions/etoc.xhtml
Email alerts
. 532. Fax: (949) 362-2049. Copyright ©2016 by AACN. All rights reserved
(AACN) published bimonthly by AACN, 101 Columbia, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656. Telephone: (800) 899-1712, (949) 362-2050, ext.
The American Journal of Critical Care is an official peer-reviewed journal of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
by AACN on December 12, 2017http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/Downloaded from
... In the United States, patients with CCI are often transferred from intensive care units (ICUs) to long-term acute care hospitals (LTACH). LTACHs are staffed by clinicians who focus on weaning patients from mechanical ventilation and helping them regain functional independence [5][6][7]. The number of LTACHs in the United States has grown over the last several decades, from under 100 in 1990 to over 400 in 2006 [8]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective To assess the experience of families and clinicians at a long term acute care hospital (LTACH) after implementing a written communication intervention. Methods Written communication templates were developed for six clinical disciplines. LTACH clinicians used templates to describe the condition of 30 mechanically ventilated patients at up to three time points. Completed templates were the basis for written summaries that were sent to families. Impressions of the intervention among families (n = 21) and clinicians (n = 17) were assessed using a descriptive correlational design. Interviews were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results We identified four themes during interviews with families: Written summaries 1) facilitated communication with LTACH staff, 2) reduced stress related to COVID-19 visitor restrictions, 3) facilitated understanding of the patient condition, prognosis, and goals and 4) facilitated communication among family members. Although clinicians understood why families would appreciate written material, they did not feel that the intervention addressed their main challenge – overly optimistic expectations for patient recovery among families. Conclusion Written communication positively affected the experience of families of LTACH patients, but was less useful for clinicians. Innovation Use of written patient care updates helps LTACH clinicians initiate communication with families.
... As a post-acute care facility, the care at LTACHs is driven by patients' continued acute medical needs with its focus on facilitation of functional recovery and www.ccejournal.org August 2023 • Volume 5 • Number 8 optimization of respiratory status, including liberation from prolonged mechanical ventilation (32). LTACHs have been proved to be an optimal facility for post-ICU care during COVID-19 pandemic with the rate of successful wean of 70.9% from prolonged mechanical ventilation (33,34). ...
Article
Full-text available
IMPORTANCE Outcomes of tracheostomized patients with COVID-19 are seldomly investigated with conflicting evidence from the existing literature. OBJECTIVES To create a study evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on tracheostomized patients by comparing clinical outcomes and weaning parameters in COVID-19 positive and negative cohorts. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective observational cohort study of 604 tracheostomized patients hospitalized in 16 ICUs in New York City between March 9, 2020, and September 8, 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Patients were stratified into two cohorts: 398 COVID-19 negative (COVID–ve) and 206 COVID-19 positive (COVID+ve) patients. Clinical characteristics, outcomes, and weaning parameters (first pressure support [PS], tracheostomy collar [TC], speech valve placement, and decannulation) were analyzed. RESULTS COVID+ve had fewer comorbidities including coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, malignancy, chronic kidney disease, liver disease, and HIV ( p < 0.05). Higher F io 2 (53% vs 44%), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (7.15 vs 5.69), P co 2 (45.8 vs 38.2), and lower pH (7.41 vs 7.43) were observed at the time of tracheostomy in COVID+ve ( p < 0.005). There was no statistical difference in post-tracheostomy complication rates. Longer time from intubation to tracheostomy (15.90 vs 13.60 d; p = 0.002), tracheostomy to first PS (2.87 vs 1.80 d; p = 0.005), and TC placement (11.07 vs 4.46 d; p < 0.001) were seen in COVID+ve. However, similar time to speech valve placement, decannulation, and significantly lower 1-year mortality (23.3% vs 36.7%; p = 0.001) with higher number of discharges to long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) (23.8% vs 13.6%; p = 0.015) were seen in COVID+ve. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Patients with COVID-19 required higher F io 2 and PEEP ventilatory support at the time of tracheostomy, with no observed change in complication rates. Despite longer initial weaning period with PS or TC, similar time to speech valve placement or decannulation with significantly lower mortality and higher LTACH discharges suggest favorable outcome in COVID-19 positive patients. Higher ventilatory support requirements and prolonged weaning should not be a deterrent to pursuing a tracheostomy.
... 3 LTACHs are specialized hospitals that provide prolonged acute and intensive care for patients with chronic and/or persistent critical illness, while focusing on patient recovery and return to a functional life. 4 Because LTACH care "focuses on continued medical stabilization, management of critical infusions, optimizing respiratory status and facilitation of functional recovery," 2 it has lead a number of physician-researchers to conclude that the LTACH clinical setting is conducive to the ongoing treatment of patients with COVID-19 who require hospitalization and post-acute care. ...
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic has presented novel challenges for the entire healthcare continuum, requiring transformative changes to hospital and post-acute care, including clinical, administrative, and physical modifications to current standards of operations. Innovative use and adaptation of long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs) can safely and effectively care for patients during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A framework for the rapid changes, including increasing collaboration with external healthcare organizations, creating new methods for enhanced communication, and modifying processes focused on patient safety and clinical outcomes, is described for a network of 94 LTACHs. When managed and modified correctly, LTACHs can play a vital role in managing the national healthcare pandemic crisis.
Article
Background: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are the second most common health care-associated infection. CAUTIs represent a serious threat to chronic critically ill patients in long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs). Evidence-based guidelines have been shown to reduce the risk of infection in acute care settings but are not well documented in LTACHs. Method: An evidence-based urinary catheter protocol was developed and implemented across three units in a large LTACH. RNs were oriented to the new protocol through online educational modules. During the evaluation period, 120 patients were admitted with a urinary catheter who qualified for chart review for CAUTI incidence. Overall catheter-days and CAUTI rates were compared, and changes in practice were noted. Results: After the education intervention, overall urinary catheter-days decreased by 10.1%, and CAUTI incidence decreased by 74% (4.82 CAUTI per 1,000 patient-days to 1.24). The absolute risk reduction was 3.58 infections per 1,000 catheter-days. The findings were statistically significant (z = 1.00, p < .03). Conclusion: Significant reductions were noted in total catheter-days, and CAUTI rates improved after implementation of an education program and an evidence-based urinary catheter protocol in an LTACH. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2018;49(8):372-377.
Article
Full-text available
Background Long-term acute care hospitals (LTACs) provide specialized treatment for patients with chronic critical illness. Increasingly LTACs are co-located within traditional short-stay hospitals rather than operated as free-standing facilities, which may affect LTAC utilization patterns and outcomes. Methods We compared free-standing and co-located LTACs using 2005 data from the United States Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. We used bivariate analyses to examine patient characteristics and timing of LTAC transfer, and used propensity matching and multivariable regression to examine mortality, readmissions, and costs after transfer. Results Of 379 LTACs in our sample, 192 (50.7%) were free-standing and 187 (49.3%) were co-located in a short-stay hospital. Co-located LTACs were smaller (median bed size: 34 vs. 66, p <0.001) and more likely to be for-profit (72.2% v. 68.8%, p = 0.001) than freestanding LTACs. Co-located LTACs admitted patients later in their hospital course (average time prior to transfer: 15.5 days vs. 14.0 days) and were more likely to admit patients for ventilator weaning (15.9% vs. 12.4%). In the multivariate propensity-matched analysis, patients in co-located LTACs experienced higher 180-day mortality (adjusted relative risk: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.00–1.11, p = 0.04) but lower readmission rates (adjusted relative risk: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75–0.98, p = 0.02). Costs were similar between the two hospital types (mean difference in costs within 180 days of transfer: -$3,580, 95% CI: -$8,720 –$1,550, p = 0.17). Conclusions Compared to patients in free-standing LTACs, patients in co-located LTACs experience slightly higher mortality but lower readmission rates, with no change in overall resource use as measured by 180 day costs.
Article
Background: Long-term acute care hospitals are an option for patients in intensive care units who require prolonged care after an acute illness. Predicting use of these facilities may help hospitals improve resource management, expenditures, and quality of care delivered in intensive care. Objective: To develop a predictive tool for early identification of intensive care patients with increased probability of transfer to such a hospital. Methods: Data on 1967 adults admitted to intensive care at a tertiary care hospital between January 2009 and June 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. The prediction model was developed by using multiple ordinal logistic regression. The model was internally validated via the bootstrapping technique and externally validated with a control cohort of 950 intensive care patients. Results: Among the study group, 146 patients (7.4%) were discharged to long-term acute care hospitals and 1582 (80.4%) to home or other care facilities; 239 (12.2%) died in the intensive care unit. The final prediction algorithm showed good accuracy (bias-corrected concordance index, 0.825; 95% CI, 0.803-0.845), excellent calibration, and external validation (concordance index, 0.789; 95% CI, 0.754-0.824). Hypoalbuminemia was the greatest potential driver of increased likelihood of discharge to a long-term acute care hospital. Other important predictors were intensive care unit category, older age, extended hospital stay before admission to intensive care, severe pressure ulcers, admission source, and dependency on mechanical ventilation. Conclusions: This new predictive tool can help estimate on the first day of admission to intensive care the likelihood of a patient's discharge to a long-term acute care hospital.
Article
The chronically critically ill (CCI) comprise a rapidly growing population of patients who have survived acute critical illness, only to be left with ongoing organ dysfunctions requiring high levels of specialized care for months or years. In many ways, CCI is an "iatrogenic" process, reflecting the ability of modern life support technologies to keep patients alive for prolonged periods of time despite ongoing life threatening illness. Venues of care for the CCI patient include acute care hospitals (both ICU and step-down facilities), specialized long term acute care hospitals, and, less commonly, skilled nursing facilities, or even the home. Importantly, CCI patients transition among these venues frequently, reflecting the nature of CCI to be punctuated with episodes of acute critical illness. Management of the CCI population requires a special combination of intensive care and rehabilitative skills.
Article
Critically ill patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) are rapidly evaluated, and aggressive management is immediately instituted. They are intubated and placed on mechanical ventilation, and invasive monitoring is begun. Many patients are successfully treated and discharged from the ICU, but unfortunately a large percentage of the critically ill do not improve and become chronically critically ill. A high percentage of these patients do not survive in spite of extraordinary life support for weeks to months. The ICU health care team and the patient's family use their collective judgment to determine which patients are salvageable and which patients have no realistic chance to regain a good quality of life and therefore should have extraordinary life support withdrawn. This article examines why chronically critically ill patients die. We present a management strategy for improving the prognosis of the chronically critically ill patient by concentrating on exercise, nutrition, fluid management, emotional support, and adequate sleep. We address issues dealing with withholding and withdrawing extraordinary life support. We conclude by demonstrating how these concepts were applied in the case of a chronically critically ill young man with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).
Long-term hospital PPS
  • Medicaid Centers For Medicare
  • Services
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Long-term hospital PPS. April 16, 2013. Available at https://www.cms .gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/LongTerm-CareHospitalPPS/index.html. Accessed November 10, 2015.
Long-Term Acute Care: Where Does It Fit in the Health Care Continuum? http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/subscriptions/ Subscription Information http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/misc/ifora.xhtml Information for authors http All rights reserved
  • J Am
  • Gloria Crit Care
  • John Tote Skinner
  • Taryn Miller
  • Christina Canfield
  • Thomas Buckingham
  • Gary Johnston
  • Samuel Hammerman
Am J Crit Care Gloria Skinner and John Tote Taryn Miller, Christina Canfield, Thomas Buckingham, Gary Johnston, Samuel Hammerman, Long-Term Acute Care: Where Does It Fit in the Health Care Continuum? http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/subscriptions/ Subscription Information http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/misc/ifora.xhtml Information for authors http://www.editorialmanager.com/ajcc Submit a manuscript http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/subscriptions/etoc.xhtml Email alerts by AACN. All rights reserved. © 2016