A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Water Resources Management
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Xiaodong Ren
1
&Zhongyi Qu
1
&Diogo S. Martins
2,3
&
Paula Paredes
2
&Luis S. Pereira
2
Received: 12 November 2015 /Accepted: 31 May 2016 /
Published online: 18 June 2016
#Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016
Abstract When weather data sets available for computing the reference evapotranspiration
are incomplete or of questionable quality, there is the need to replace the FAO Penman-
Monteith (PM-ET
o
) method by approaches requiring reduced sets only, particularly maximum
and minimum temperature. The Hargreaves-Samani (HS) equation and the PM-ET
o
using only
temperature data (PMT) are considered in this study and their results are compared with those
of the PM-ET
o
using full datasets. Daily data sets refer to the period 1981–2012 and to a
network of 50 meteorological stations covering the wide range of climates of Inner Mongolia.
For both the PMT and HS methods, the solar radiation coefficients k
Rs
were calibrated and
have shown to be similar for both methods and to vary with climate aridity. For the PMT, the
estimation of the dew point temperature (T
dew
) was performed using the minimum temperature
corrected for site aridity or, for humid climates, from a value near the average temperature.
This improved estimation of T
dew
was essential for a good performance of the PMT method in
arid conditions and when temperatures are extremely low. RMSE <1 mm day
−1
was obtained
for both HS and PMT methods, and the modeling efficiency generally exceeded 0.85. The
worse results correspond to windy and arid locations. The principal components analysis
(PCA) in R-Mode have shown that the spatial variability of ET
o
computed with PM-ET
o
or
with the HS and PMT methods were coherent. PCA supported the interpretation of ET
o
results.
Overall, PMT performed better than HS for most locations.
Water Resour Manage (2016) 30:3769–3791
DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1384-9
*Zhongyi Qu
quzhongyi@imau.edu.cn
*Luis S. Pereira
lspereira@isa.ulisboa.pt
1
Institute of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,
Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010018, China
2
LEAF, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa,
Portugal
3
Instituto Dom Luiz, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
Daily Reference Evapotranspiration for Hyper-Arid
to Moist Sub-Humid Climates in Inner Mongolia, China:
I. Assessing Temperature Methods and Spatial Variability
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.