Content uploaded by Subashini Chathumini Jayasiri
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Subashini Chathumini Jayasiri on Jun 07, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
Phytotaxa 263 (3): 233–244
http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/
Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press Article PHYTOTAXA
ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition)
ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition)
Accepted by Jian-Kui Liu: 10 May 2016; published: 3 Jun. 2016
http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.263.3.4
233
A new species of genus Anteaglonium (Anteagloniaceae, Pleosporales) with its
asexual morph
SUBASHINI C. JAYASIRI1,2, E.B. GARETH JONES3, JI-CHUAN KANG2, ITTHAYAKORN PROMPUTTHA4,*,
ALI H. BAHKALI3 & KEVIN D. HYDE1, 3, 5
1Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand
2Engineering Research Center of Southwest Bio-Pharmaceutical Resources, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang
550025, Guizhou Province, China
3Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 1145, Saudi Arabia
4Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
5World Agro forestry Centre East and Central Asia Office, 132 Lanhei Road, Kunming 650201, China
*Author for correspondence: itthayakorn.p@cmu.ac.th
Abstract
The family Anteagloniaceae comprises the genera, Anteaglonium and Flammeascoma. The family shares similar characters
with taxa in the Hysteriales, but groups in the Pleosporales. No asexual morph is known in this family. In the present study
we introduce a new species Anteaglonium thailandicum, re-examine A. parvulum and document its asexual morph. We ob-
served different culture characters with similar morphology and molecular data for four strains of A. parvulum isolated from
collections in Thailand. In this study we introduce A. thailandicum which has different hysterothecial characters as compared
to A. parvulum and A. globosum, especially in the globose, roughened wall, indistinct slit, short subicula and short tomentum
and also based on differences in LSU, SSU and TEF sequence data.
Keywords: Asexual, hysterothecia, LSU, SSU, TEF
Introduction
The family Anteagloniaceae was introduced by Hyde et al. (2013) to accommodate a monotypic genus Anteaglonium
which is associated with decorticated wood. Mugambi and Huhndorf (2009) introduced Anteaglonium, which grouped
in the Pleosporales and outside the order Hysteriales, which shows parallel evolution of hysteriothecial ascomata in the
class Dothideomycetes. A similar topology was shown in other studies (Schoch et al. 2009; Mugambi and Huhndorf
2009a; Zhang et al. 2012a) and confirmed by Hyde et al. (2013) and Wijayawardene et al. (2014). These studies show
that A. abbreviatum (Schwein.) Mugambi & Huhndorf, A. globosum Mugambi & Huhndorf, A. parvulum (W.R. Gerard)
Mugambi & Huhndorf and A. latirostrum Mugambi & Huhndorf, group in the Anteagloniaceae. The first three species
are characterized by hyaline didymospores (Zogg 1962), less than 8 μm long. The fourth species A. latirostrum has
longer spores (>8 μm). This family share common characters of thick-walled, carbonaceous, navicular pseudothecia
that characteristically dehisce by a longitudinal slit. Anteaglonium and Flammeascoma of this family have different
spore morphology and are clearly separated in the phylogenetic analyses. Anteaglonium shares similar morphological
characters with Psiloglonium, but is phylogenetically distinct (Mugambi and Huhndorf 2009). Anteaglonium had
previously been placed in Hysteriaceae because of its hysterothecial ascomata (Boehm et al. 2009b; Mugambi and
Huhndorf 2009; Hyde et al. 2013). Subsequently, Flammeascoma was added in this family by Liu et al. (2015).
Thick-walled, navicular hysterothecia with a prominent longitudinal slit, has long been considered synapomorphic,
and defining the order Hysteriales. However, this type of fruiting body has evolved five times within the subclass
Pleosporomycetidae (e.g., Farlowiella, Glonium, Anteaglonium, Hysterographium and Hysteriaceae) (Boehm et al.
2009a). It clearly shows that Anteaglonium (family Anteagloniaceae) evolved separately from Hysteriaceae (Boehm
et al. 2009b). Clearly, additional species and genera need to be sampled before a complete picture emerges for the
family Anteagloniaceae. In this study we introduce A. thailandicum and re-examine the morphology and phylogeny of
A. parvulum and record for the first time an asexual morph for this genus.
JAYASIRI ET AL.
234 • Phytotaxa 263 (3) © 2016 Magnolia Press
Material and Methods
Collections, morphology and isolation
Specimens were collected in Chiang Rai, Thailand. Studies on the gross morphology and photomicrography were
carried out under a Nikon Eclipse Ni stereomicroscope. Sections of ascomata were made by free-hand using a blade.
Several specimens were used to observe the asci and ascospore characters and slides were preserved in lactoglycerol.
Micro-morphological characters were observed under a compound microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ni), and measurements
made using Tarosoft (R) Image Frame Work v. 0.9.7. Single spore isolation was carried out following the method of
Chomnunti et al. (2014). New isolates are deposited in the Mae Fah Luang University Herbarium (MFLU), Chiang
Rai, Thailand and Herbarium of Cryptogams Kunming Institute of Botany Academia Sinica (HKAS) China and ex-
type cultures in Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection (MFLUCC), and Kunming Institute of Botany (KIB).
Facesoffungi (Jayasiri et al. 2015) and Index Fungorum (2016) numbers are provided for new taxa.
Establishing the asexual morphs
Circular (0.5 cm) agar blocks from growing colony margins were cut and placed on fresh Malt Extract Agar (MEA)
plates as described in Phookamak et al. (2015). Asexual structures produced on Malt Extract Agar were observed after
eight weeks of incubation, under light, at 20° C.
DNA isolation, amplification and sequencing
Fungal isolates grown on MEA for 28–30 days at 25°C in the dark. Genomic DNA was extracted from the growing
mycelium using the Biospin Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (BioFlux®) following the manufacturer’s protocol
(Hangzhou, P.R. China). DNA amplifications were performed by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). The partial
small subunit nuclear rDNA (SSU) was amplified by using primers NS1 and NS4 (White et al. 1990). The partial
large subunit nuclear rDNA (LSU) was amplified by using primers LROR and LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990). The
translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene (TEF1) was amplified by using primers EF1-983F and EF1-2218R (Rehner
2001). The amplification reaction was carried out following the protocol: The final volume of the PCR reaction was
50μl which contained 2.0μl of DNA template, 1.5μl of each forward and reverse primers, 25μl of 2× Easy Taq PCR
SuperMix (mixture of EasyTaqTM DNA Polymerase, dNTPs, and optimized buffer, Beijing TransGen Biotech Co.,
Ltd., Chaoyang District, Beijing, PR China) and 20μl sterilized water (Phookamsak et al. 2013). The PCR thermal
cycle program of nuSSU, nuLSU and TEF1 genes amplification were provided as: initially 94 °C for 3 min, followed
by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 50 s, elongation at 72 °C for 1 min, and final
extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Newly generated sequence is in GenBank
Phylogenetic analysis
Sequence data were downloaded from GenBank to supplement the dataset (Table 1) The represented sequences
including those newly obtained were aligned using MAFFT v. 6.864b (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/index.
html) and improved manually where necessary using Bioedit (Hall 1999). Dendryphiopsis atra AFTOL-ID 273
selected as the outgroup taxon. The model of evolution was carried out using MrModeltest 2.2 (Nylander 2004). The
nucleotide substitution models selected for individual and combined datasets were GTR+I+G. Maximum likelihood
analysis was performed using RAxML GUIv.0.9b2 (Silvestro and Michalak 2011). The search strategy was set to rapid
bootstrapping and the analysis carried out using the GTRGAMMAI model of nucleotide substitution. The number of
replicates was inferred using the stopping criterion (Pattengale et al. 2009). Maximum Likelihood bootstrap values
equal or greater than 70% are given as the first set of numbers above the nodes (Fig. 1).
To perform Bayesian analysis, the model of evolution was performed by using MrModeltest 2.2 (Nylander
2004). The nucleotide substitution models selected for individual and combined datasets were GTR+I+G. Posterior
probabilities (PP) (Rannala and Yang 1996; Zhaxybayeva and Gogarten 2002) were determined by Markov Chain
Monte Carlo sampling (MCMC) in MrBayes v. 3.0b4 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001). Four simultaneous Markov
chains were run for 1, 000, 000 (0.008 split frequencies) generations and trees were sampled every 100th generation;
a total 10,000 trees were obtained. The first 2000 trees, representing the burn-in phase of the analyses, were discarded,
while the remaining trees were used for calculating posterior probabilities in the majority rule consensus tree (critical
value for the topological convergence diagnostic set to 0.01) (Zhaxybayeva and Gogarten 2002). Posterior probabilities
(PP) values equal or greater than 0.90 are given as the second set of numbers above the nodes (Fig. 1).
ANTEAGLONIUM (ANTEAGLONIACEAE) Phytotaxa 263 (3) © 2016 Magnolia Press • 235
TABLE 1. Taxa used in the phylogenetic analysis and GenBank accession numbers (LSU, SSU and TEF 1 sequence data)
and species. The newly generated sequences are indicated in bold.
Species name Family Culture number Gene Bank accession no.
LSU SSU TEF 1
Aigialus mangrovis Aigialaceae BCC 33564 GU479777 GU479742 GU479841
Aigialus grandis Aigialaceae BCC 18419TGU479774 GU479738 GU479838
Anteaglonium parvulum Anteagloniaceae GKM 1218 GQ221880 NA GQ221922
Anteaglonium parvulum Anteagloniaceae SMH 5223 GQ221909 NA GQ221918
Anteaglonium parvulum Anteagloniaceae SMH5210 GQ221907 NA GQ221917
Anteaglonium parvulum Anteagloniaceae GKM219N GQ221881 NA GQ221916
Anteaglonium parvulum Anteagloniaceae MFLUCC 14 0815 KU922911 KU922912 KU922919
Anteaglonium parvulum Anteagloniaceae MFLUCC 14-0817 KU922913 KU922914 NA
Anteaglonium parvulum Anteagloniaceae MFLUCC 14-0821 KU922915 KU922916 KU922921
Anteaglonium parvulum Anteagloniaceae MFLUCC 14-0823 KU922917 KU922918 KU922922
Anteaglonium brasiliense Anteagloniaceae HUEFS 192250TKF906410 NA NA
Anteaglonium abbreviatum Anteagloniaceae ANM 925aTGQ221877 NA NA
Anteaglonium abbreviatum Anteagloniaceae GKM 1029 GQ221878 NA NA
Anteaglonium globosum Anteagloniaceae ANM 925.2 GQ221879 NA NA
Anteaglonium globosum Anteagloniaceae SMH 5283 GQ221911 NA GQ221919
Anteaglonium latirostrum Anteagloniaceae GKM 1119 GQ221874 NA GQ221937
Anteaglonium latirostrum Anteagloniaceae GKML100Nb GQ221876 NA GQ221938
Anteaglonium thailandium Anteagloniaceae MFLUCC 14-0816TKU922909 KU922910 KU922920
Amniculicola immerse Amniculicolaceae CBS 123 083 FJ795498 GU456295 GU456273
Amniculicola parva Amniculicolaceae CBS 123 092 GU301797 GU296134 GU349065
Ascocratera manglicola Aigialaceae BCC 09270 T GU479782 GU479747 GU479846
Byssolophis sphaerioides Lopiostomataceae IFRDCC2053 GU301805 GU456296 GU456263
Delitschia winteri Delitschiaceae AFTOL-ID 1599 DQ678077 DQ678026 DQ677922
Dendryphiopsis atra Kirschsteiniotheliaceae AFTOL-ID 273 DQ678046 DQ677996 DQ677884
Fissuroma maculans Aigialaceae MFLUCC 10 0886TNG_042598 JN846734 NA
Flammeascoma bambusae Anteagloniaceae MFLUCC 10 0551TKP744485 KP753952 NA
Flammeascoma lignicola Anteagloniaceae MFLUCC 10 0128TKT324583 KT324584 KT324585
Gloniopsis subrugosa Hysteriaceae SMH557 GQ221896 NA GU397337
Glonium stellatum Gloniaceae CBS 207.34 FJ161179 FJ161140 FJ161095
Hysterium pulicare Hysteriaceae ANM1455 GQ221904 NA GQ221932
Hysterobrevium mori Hysteriaceae GKM 1013 GU397344 NA GU397338
Lepidosphaeria nicotiae Testudinaceae AFTOL-ID 1576TDQ678067 NA DQ677910
Lindgomyces ingoldianus Lindgomycetaceae ATCC 200398TNG042321 AB521719 NA
Lindgomyces rotundatus Lindgomycetaceae HHUF 27999/KT
1096
AB521740 AB521723 NA
Lophiotrema
brunneosporum
Lophiotremataceae CBS 123095 GU301835 GU296165 GU349071
...Continued on next page
JAYASIRI ET AL.
236 • Phytotaxa 263 (3) © 2016 Magnolia Press
TABLE 1. (Continued)
Species name Family Culture number Gene Bank accession no.
LSU SSU TEF 1
Lophiotrema lignicola Lophiotremataceae CBS 122364T GU301836 GU296166 GU349072
Lophiotrema nucula Lophiotremataceae JCM 14132 AB619021 AB618703 NA
Lophiotrema nucula Lophiotremataceae CBS 627.86TGU301837 GU296167 GU349073
Lophium mytilinum Mytilinidiaceae AFTOL-ID 1609 DQ678081 DQ678030 DQ677926
Mytilinidion mytilinellum Mytilinidiaceae CBS 303.34 FJ161184 FJ161144 FJ161100
Neoastrosphaeriella
krabiensis
Aigialaceae MFLUCC 11 0025TNG042599 JN846739 NA
Oedohysterium insidens Hysteriaceae CBS 238.34 NA FJ161142 FJ161097
Polyplosphaeria fusca Tetraplosphaeriaceae KT 1616TAB524604 AB524463 AB524820
Pseudotetraploa
curviappendiculata
Tetraplosphaeriaceae KT 2558 AB524610 AB524469 AB524825
Psiloglonium simulans Hysteriaceae CBS 206.34 FJ161178 FJ161139 FJ161094
Quadricrura
septentrionalis
Tetraplosphaeriaceae HC 4984TAB524616 NA AB524831
Quintaria submersa Salsugineaceae CBS 11 5553 GU301866 NA GU349003
Rimora mangrovei Aigialaceae JK 5437BT GU479798 GU479765 NA
Salsuginea ramicola Salsugineaceae KT 2597.1TGU479800 GU479767 GU479861
Tetraplosphaeria sasicola Tetraplosphaeriaceae KT 563TAB524631 AB524490 AB524838
Triplosphaeria maxima Tetraplosphaeriaceae KT 870TAB524637 AB524496 AB524843
Verruculina enalia Testudinaceae BCC 18401TGU479802 GU479770 GU479863
Ulospora bilgramii Testudinaceae CBS 110020TDQ384108 DQ384083 NA
TType strain.
bNA = not available.
Results and Discussion
Molecular phylogeny
The combined LSU, SSU and TEF 1 dataset comprising 53 strains of species from the family Anteagloniaceae and
families close to Anteagloniaceae, were used to determine the generic placement of our four isolates of A. parvulum
and an isolate of A. thailandicum. Taxa were selected using multigene phylogenetic analysis of previous studies of
the class Dothideomycetes (Hyde et al. 2013; Wijayawardene et al. 2014) and family Anteagloniaceae (De Almeida
et al. 2014; Liu et al. 2015; Ariyawansa et al. 2015). Phylogenetic trees obtained from Maximum Likelihood and
Bayesian analysis yielded trees with similar overall topology at subclass and family relationships are in agreement
with previous work based on Maximum Likelihood analysis (De Almeida et al. 2014; Ariyawansa et al. 2015; Liu et
al. 2015). Individual LSU, SSU and TEF 1 single gene trees were initially made and had a similar topology (data not
shown). Therefore, the genes were combined and the best scoring ML tree is presented in Fig. 1. Our four A. parvulum
(MFLUCC 14 0815, 14-0817, 14-0821, 14-0823) isolates clustered with other strains of A. parvulum (GKM 1218,
SMH 5223, SMH5210 and GKM 219 N), hence we could confirm placement of our new collections. In addition,
we introduce A. thailandicum as it separates from species in the genus. In this study both Maximum Likelihood and
Bayesian analyses show a relationship with other verified Anteaglonium species. The new sequence data are deposited
in GenBank (Table 1).
ANTEAGLONIUM (ANTEAGLONIACEAE) Phytotaxa 263 (3) © 2016 Magnolia Press • 237
FIGURE 1. RAxML Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree based on a combined partial LSU, SSU and TEF 1 gene datasets. Bootstrap
values from maximum likelihood (ML, left) more than 70% are given above the nodes. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP, right) of more
than 0.90 are given above the nodes. The tree is rooted to Dendryphiopsis atra AFTOL-ID 273. All new isolates are in blue.
JAYASIRI ET AL.
238 • Phytotaxa 263 (3) © 2016 Magnolia Press
Taxonomy
Anteaglonium Mugambi & Huhndorf, Syst. Biodiv. 7(4): 460 (2009)
Type: Anteaglonium abbreviatum (Schwein.) Mugambi & Huhndorf.
Anteaglonium thailandicum Jayasiri & K.D. Hyde, sp. nov.
Index Fungorum Number: IF551984 Facesoffungi Number: FoF 01930 Fig:2
Holotype: MFLU 16-0471
Etymology:—With reference to country where the specimen was found.
FIGURE 2. Anteaglonium thailandicum (holotype). a–c View of hysterothecia on host surface. d Section through hysterothecium. e
Peridium. f Pseudoparaphyses. g–l Ascospores. m–p Asci. Scale bars: d=100 μm, e=20 μm, f=10 µm, g–l=5 µm, m–p=20 µm.
Saprobic on decorticated wood of an unidentified plant. Sexual morph: Hysterothecia 250–430 μm long, 200–250
μm high, 170–200 μm wide, superficial, carbonaceous, black, subglobose to oblong, straight, smooth or slightly striate
laterally, with a longitudinal slit, sulcus shallow, gregarious, linear or rarely lying at irregular angles, occurring on
a black thin crust, tending to darken the substratum, without KOH extractable pigments. Peridium 34–66 μm thick,
carbonaceous, brittle with age, longitudinally striated at the margins, thickened towards apex, base less thick, the inner
layer compressed and pallid, the outer layer thickened, comprising pigmented cells of textural angularis. Hamathecium
comprising numerous, 1–1.5 µm (n = 30) wide, aseptate pseudoparaphyses, branched above the asci. Asci 45–50 ×
3.5–5.5 μm, 8-spored, bitunicate, cylindrical, short pedicellate, obliquely to irregularly uniseriate. Ascospores 6.4–7.8
× 2.4–3.1 μm (
x
= 7 × 2.8 µm; n = 20), ellipsoid to obovoid, straight, hyaline, smooth-walled, 1-septate, constricted at
the septum, guttulate. Asexual morph: Coelomycetous. Conidiomata 100–150 µm high, 150–170 µm diam., pycnidial,
globose, superficial to subperidermal, separate, unilocular, thick-walled, ostiolate. Conidiomata wall 30–50 µm wide,
composed of 6–8 layers, with outer 2–3 layers of pale brown and inner 4–5 layers of hyaline cells of texura angularis.
Conidiophores long, unbranched, hyaline, formed from the innermost layer of wall cells. Conidiogenous cells 3–5 ×
2–3 µm, globose, hyaline, smooth, with a rounded tip. Conidia 3–5 × 2–3 µm (
x
= 4 × 2.5 µm; n = 20), hyaline, oval
to globose, rounded at both ends, aseptate, smooth walled (Fig. 3).
Culture characters:—Colonies on MEA 23 mm diam after 7 d, raised, with lobate margin; colony two layered,
outer layer white and inwardly black. with asexual structures, finely floccose to woolly aerial mycelium in outer layer.
Reverse off white with middle black.
Material examined:—THAILAND. Chiang Rai: Doi Pui, dead branch of undetermined, 15 June 2014, Subashini
C. Jayasiri (MFLU 16-0471, holotype; isotype in KUN); ex-type culture, MFLUCC 14-0816, KUNCC.
ANTEAGLONIUM (ANTEAGLONIACEAE) Phytotaxa 263 (3) © 2016 Magnolia Press • 239
FIGURE 3. Asexual morph of Anteaglonium thailandicum from culture. a Germinated spore. b, c Culture from above and below. d, e
Fruiting bodies forming in culture. f Vertical section of conidioma. g Conidiomata wall. h Conidiophore. j, i Conidiogenous cells. k–n
Conidia. Scale bars: a=10 µm, f=50 µm, g–j=20 µm, k–n=5 µm, k=10 µm.
Notes:—This species belongs to the genus Anteaglonium because of its morphological features, in particular
the oval to elongate, or globose to subglobose, black, carbonaceous, hysterothecia, which are superficial or sunken
in the substrate, cylindric-clavate, short-pedicellate asci, and uniseriate, hyaline, two-celled, small (less than 8 μm
long) ascospores. It also differs in the multigene phylogenetic analysis, where it clusters with other Anteaglonium
JAYASIRI ET AL.
240 • Phytotaxa 263 (3) © 2016 Magnolia Press
species but is distinct. Anteaglonium globosum resembles A. thailandicum in spore shape and size and in tending
to darken the substratum, but Anteaglonium globosum differs from A. thailandicum in having globose hysterothecia
with a roughened wall, an indistinct slit, short subicula, short tomentum hysterothecial wall and producing a strong
green soluble pigments in KOH. Anteaglonium thailandicum lacks a subiculum, has a rough, tomentose and irregular
hysterothecial wall and lacks KOH extractable pigments. These character differences and multigene phylogenetic
analysis are used to justify the introduction of this new species.
Anteaglonium parvulum (W.R. Gerard) Mugambi & Huhndorf, Syst. Biodiv. 7(4): 462 (2009)
Facesoffungi Number: FoF 01931
Reference specimen: MFLU 16-0472 Fig: 4
FIGURE 4. Anteaglonium parvulum (MFLU 16-0472-reference specimen). a–c View of hysterothecia on host surface. d Section through
hysterothecium. e Pseudoparaphyses. f–i Ascospores. j–m Asci. Scale bars: d=50 µm, e=10 µm, f–i=5 µm, j–m=10 µm.
Saprobic on dead wood. Sexual morph: Hysterothecia 250–430 μm long, 200–250 μm high, 170–200 μm wide
hysterothecial, superficial or sunken in substrate, oval to elongate, or globose to subglobose, black, carbonaceous,
straight or curved, rarely branched, without subiculum, acuminate apices, occurring on a black thin crust, not tending
ANTEAGLONIUM (ANTEAGLONIACEAE) Phytotaxa 263 (3) © 2016 Magnolia Press • 241
to darken the substratum, without KOH extractable pigments. Ostiole central, slit-like. Peridium 35–41 μm thick, dark
brown, comprising a single stratum of dark brown cells of textura epidermoidea. Hamathecium comprising 0.5–1.3
μm thin, cylindrical to filiform, hyaline, septate pseudoparaphyses in a gelatinous matrix, found between and above the
asci. Asci 30–52 × 3.2–5.8 μm, 8-spored, bitunicate, fissitunicate, elongate cylindric-clavate, straight or slightly curved,
short-pedicellate, apically rounded, with an ocular chamber. Ascospores 5.2–8 × 2–3.2 μm (
x
= 7 × 2.7 µm; n = 20),
uniseriate, 2-celled, very small, ellipsoidal, hyaline, 1-septate, constricted at septa, widest at the middle and tapering
towards the narrow ends, straight, smooth-walled. Asexual morph: Coelomycetous. Conidiomata 110–121 µm high,
104–115 µm diam., pycnidial, globose, superficial to subperidermal, separate, unilocular, thick-walled. Conidiomata
wall 19–23 µm wide, composed of 4–6 layers, brown colour cells textura angularis. Conidiophores 8–13 µm long,
unbranched, hyaline, formed from the innermost layer of wall cells. Conidiogenous cells 3–5 × 3–2–3 µm, globose,
hyaline, smooth, with a rounded tip. Conidia 3–5 × 2–3 µm (
x
= 4 × 2.5 µm; n = 20), hyaline, oval to globose, rounded
at both ends, aseptate, smooth walled (Fig. 5).
FIGURE 5. Asexual morph of Anteaglonium parvulum from culture. a Germinated ascospore. b Above view of colony. c Reverse view
of colony. d Asexual structures in culture. e Section through pycnidia. f Conidiomata wall. g, h Conidiogenous cells. i Conidia. Scale bars:
b, c=4 cm, e=50 µm, f=20 µm, g–i=10 µm.
JAYASIRI ET AL.
242 • Phytotaxa 263 (3) © 2016 Magnolia Press
Colony characteristics:—Colonies on MEA, 13–16 mm diam within 7 days at 25° C, tightly arranged, with short,
aerial mycelium. Four strains were isolated from this species and there are given different colonies when grow in same
condition (Fig. 6).
Material examined:—THAILAND. Chiang Rai: Doi Pui, dead branch of undetermined tree, 15 June 2014,
Subashini C. Jayasiri, reference specimen designated here (MFLU 16-0472, (HKAS91941) (MFLU 16-0473,
MFLU16-0474, MFLU 16-0470) ex-type culture (MFLUCC 14-0817) (MFLUCC 14-0815, MFLUCC 14-0821,
MFLUCC 14-0823).
Notes:—This species belongs to the genus Anteaglonium because of its morphological features, in particular
the black, carbonaceous hysterothecia, cylindric-clavate, short-pedicellate asci, and uniseriate, hyaline, two-celled,
small (less than 8 μm) ascospores. In the multigene phylogenetic analysis, it also clusters with other Anteaglonium
species. In this study, four Anteaglonium parvulum strains (MFLUCC 14-0817, MFLUCC 14-0815, MFLUCC 14-
0821, MFLUCC 14-0823) were isolated from Chiang Rai, Thailand. They are morphologically similar with previous
records (GKM 1218, SMH 5223, SMH5210, GKM 219 N) of this species in having acuminate hysterothecial apices,
lack of darkening of substrate, and absence of KOH-soluble pigments (Boehm et al. 2009b). They also clustered
with sequences strains of A. parvulum from the GenBank. Morphologically and phylogenetically these four strains
(MFLUCC 14-0817, MFLUCC 14-0815, MFLUCC 14-0821, MFLUCC 14-0823) are similar, but have different
culture characteristics as illustrated in Fig. 6. Biological and culture characters were used as criteria for separating
species in plant pathogenic fungi (Bernadovičová and Juhásová 2006), but this is not adopted in this paper.
FIGURE 6. Different colony morphology of four Anteaglonium parvulum strains. a MFLUCC 14-0817 forward, b Reverse. c MFLUCC
14-0821 forward, d Reverse. e MFLUCC 14-0823 forward, f Reverse. g MFLUCC 14-0815 forward, h Reverse. Scale bars: a–h=4 cm.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the International Research Group Program (IRG-14-27), Deanship of Scientific
Research, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. K.D. Hyde thanks the Chinese Academy of Sciences, [project number
2013T2S003], for the award of Visiting Professorship for Senior International Scientists at Kunming Institute of
Botany. MFLU [grant number 56101020032] is thanked for supporting studies on Dothideomycetes. We are grateful
to the Mushroom Research Foundation, Chiang Rai, Thailand. Subashini C. Jayasiri is grateful to Mr. and (Late) Mrs.
Jayasiri and S.P.R.D. Lasantha for their valuable suggestions.
References
Ariyawansa, H.A., Hyde, K.D., Jayasiri, S.C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K.W.T., Dai, D.Q., Dai, Y.C., Daranagama, D.A., Jayawardena,
R.S., Lücking, R., Ghobad-Nejhad, M., Niskanen, T., Thambugala, K.M., Voigt, K, Zhao, R.L., Li, G.J., Doilom, M., Boonmee,
S., Yang, Z.L., Cai, Q., Cui, Y.Y., Bahkali, A.H., Chen, J., Cui, B.K., Chen, J.J., Dayarathne, M.C., Dissanayake, A.J., Ekanayaka,
A.H., Hashimoto, A., Hongsanan, S., Jones, E.B.G., Larsson, E., Li, W.J., Li, Q.R., Liu, J.K., Luo, Z.L., Maharachchikumbura,
ANTEAGLONIUM (ANTEAGLONIACEAE) Phytotaxa 263 (3) © 2016 Magnolia Press • 243
S.S.N., Mapook, A., McKenzie, E.H.C., Norphanphoun, C., Konta, S., Pang, K.L., Perera, R.H., Phookamsak, R., Phukhamsakda,
C., Pinruan, U., Randrianjohany, E., Singtripop, C., Tanaka, K., Tian, C.M., Tibpromma, S., Abdel-Wahab, M.A., Wanasinghe, D.N.,
Wijayawardene, N.N., Zhang, J.F., Zhang, H., Abdel-Aziz, F.A., Wedin, M., Westberg, M., Ammirati, J.F., Bulgakov, T.S., Lima,
D.X., Callaghan, T.M., Callac, P., Chang, C.H., Coca, L.F., Dal-Forno, M., Dollhofer, V., Fliegerová, K., Greiner, K., Griffith, G.W.,
Ho, H.M., Hofstetter, V., Jeewon, R., Kang, J.C., Wen, T.C., Kirk, P.M., Kytövuori, I., Lawrey, J.D., Xing, J., Li, H., Liu, Z.Y., Liu,
X.Z., Liimatainen, K., Lumbsch, H.T., Matsumura, M., Moncada, B., Nuankaew, S., Parnmen, S., de Azevedo Santiago, A.L.C.M.,
Sommai,S., Song, Y., de Souza, C.A.F., de Souza-Motta, C.M., Su, H.Y., Suetrong, S., Wang, Y., Wei, S.F., Wen, T.C., Yuan, H.S.,
Zhou, L.W., Réblová, M., Fournier, J., Camporesi, E., Luangsa-ard, J.J., Tasanathai, K., Khonsanit, A., Thanakitpipattana, D.,
Somrithipol, S., Diederich, P., Millanes, A.M., Common, R.S., Stadler, M., Yan, J.Y., Li, X.H., Lee, H.W., Nguyen, T.T.T., Lee,
H.B., Battistin, E., Marsico, O., Vizzini, A., Vila, J., Ercole, E., Eberhardt, U., Simonini, G., Wen, H.A. & Chen, X.H. (2015) Fungal
Diversity Notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 75(1): 27–274.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5
Bernadovičová, S. & Juhasova, G. (2006) Cultural characteristics of Phytophthora fungi – causal agents of ink disease on chestnut trees
(Castanea sativa Mill.) in Slovakia. Folia Oecology 32: 51–58.
Boehm, E.W.A., Mugambi, G.K., Miller, A.N., Huhndorf, S.M., Marincowitz, S., Spatafora, J.W. & Schoch, C.L. (2009b) A molecular
phylogenetic reappraisal of the Hysteriaceae, Mytilinidiaceae and Gloniaceae (Pleosporomycetidae, Dothideomycetes) with keys to
world species. Studies in Mycology 64: 49–83.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3114/sim.2009.64.03
Boehm, E.W.A., Schoch, C.L. & Spatafora, J.W. (2009a) On the evolution of the Hysteriaceae and Mytilinidiaceae (Pleosporomycetidae,
Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) using four nuclear genes. Mycological Research 113: 461–479.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2008.12.001
Chomnunti, P., Hongsanan, S., Hudson, B.A., Tian, Q., Persoh, D., Dhami, M.K., Alias, A.S., Xu, J., Liu, X., Stadler, M. & Hyde, K.D.
(2014) The Sooty Moulds. Fungal Diversity 66: 1–36.
http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s13225-014-0278-5
De Almeida, D.A.C., Gusmao, L.F.P. & Miller, A.N. (2014) A new genus and three new species of hysteriaceous ascomycetes from the
semiarid region of Brazil. Phytotaxa 176 (1): 298–308.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.176.1.28
Hall, T.A. (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic
Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.
Hyde, K.D., Jones, E.B.G., Liu, J.K., Ariyawansa, H.A., Boehm, E., Boonmee, S., Braun, U., Chomnunti, P., Crous. P.W., Dai, D.Q.,
Diederich, P., Dissanayake, A., Doilom, M., Doveri, F., Hongsanan, S., Jayawardena, R., Lawrey, J.D., Li, Y.M., Liu, Y.X., Lücking,
R., Monkai, J., Muggia, L., Nelsen, M.P., Pang, K.L., Phookamsak, R., Senanayake, I., Shearer, C.A., Suetrong, S., Tanaka, K.,
Thambugala, K.M., Wijayawardene, N.N., Wikee, S., Wu, H.X., Zhang. Y., Aguirre-Hudson, B., Alias, S.A., Aptroot, A., Bahkali,
A.H., Bezerra, J.L., Bhat, D.J., Camporesi, E., Chukeatirote, E., Gueidan, C., Hawksworth, D.L., Hirayama, K., Hoog, S.D., Kang,
J.C., Knudsen, K., Li, W.J., Li, X.H., Liu, Z.Y., Mapook, A., McKenzie, E.H.C., Miller, A.N., Mortimer, P.E., Phillips, A.J.L., Raja,
H.A., Scheuer, C., Schumm, F., Taylor, J.E., Tian, Q., Tibpromma, S., Wanasinghe, D.N., Wang, Y., Xu, J.C., Yan, J.Y., Yacharoen,
S. & Zhang, M. (2013) Families of Dothideomycetes. Fungal Diversity 63: 1–313.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-013-0263-4
Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
Index Fungorum (2016) Available from: http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp. (accessed February 2016)
Jayasiri, S.C., Hyde, K.D., Ariyawansa, H.A., Bhat, J., Buyck, B., Cai, L., Dai, Y.C., Abd-Elsalam, K.A., Ertz, D., Hidayat, I., Jeewon,
R., Jones, E.B.G., Bahkali, A.H., Karunarathna, S.C., Liu, J.K., Luangsa-ard, J.J., Lumbsch, H.T., Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.,
McKenzie, E.H.C., Moncalvo, J.M., Ghobad-Nejhad, M., Nilsson, H., Pang, K., Pereira, O.L., Phillips, A.J.L., Raspé, O., Rollins,
A.W., Romero, A.I., Etayo, J., Selçuk, F., Stephenson, S.L., Suetrong, S., Taylor, J.E., Tsui, C.K.M., Vizzini, A., Abdel-Wahab,
M.A., Wen, T.C., Boonmee, S., Dai, D.Q., Daranagama, D.A., Dissanayake, A.J., Ekanayaka, A.H., Fryar, S.C., Hongsanan, S.,
Jayawardena, R.S., Li, W.J., Perera, R.H., Phookamsak, R., De Silva, N.I., Thambugala, K.M., Tian, Q., Wijayawardene, N.N., Zhao,
R.L., Zhao, Q., Kang, J.C. & Promputtha, I. (2015) The Faces of Fungi database: fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny
and human impacts. Fungal Diversity 74 (1): 3–18.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0351-8
Liu, J.K., Hyde, K.D., Jones, E.B.G., Ariyawansa, H.A., Bhat, D.J., Boonmee, S., Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N., McKenzie, E.H.C.,
Phookamsak, R., Phukhamsakda, C., Shenoy, B.D., Abdel-Wahab, M.A., Buyck, B., Chen, J., Chethana, K.W.T., Singtripop, C.,
Dai, D.Q., Dai, Y.C., Daranagama, D.A., Dissanayake, A.J., Doilom, M., D’souza, M.J., Fan, X.L., Goonasekara, I.D., Hirayama, K.,
Hongsanan, S., Jayasiri, S.C., Jayawardena, R.S., Karunarathna, S.C., Li, W.J., Mapook, A., Norphanphoun, C., Pang, K.L., Perera,
R.H., Peršoh, D., Pinruan, U., Senanayake, I.C., Somrithipol, S., Suetrong, S., Tanaka, K., Thambugala, K.M., Tian, Q., Tibpromma,
S., Udayanga, D., Wijayawardene, N.N., Wanasinghe, D.N., Wisitrassameewong, K., Zeng, X.Y., Abdel-Aziz, F.A., Adamčík, S.,
JAYASIRI ET AL.
244 • Phytotaxa 263 (3) © 2016 Magnolia Press
Bahkali, A.H., Boonyuen, N., Bulgakov, T., Callac, P., Chomnunti, P., Greiner, K., Hashimoto, A., Hofstetter, V., Kang, J.C., Lewis,
D., Li, X.H., Liu, X.Z., Liu, Z.Y., Matsumura, M., Mortimer, P.E., Rambold, G., Randrianjohany, E., Sato, G., Sri-Indrasutdhi, V.,
Tian, C.M., Verbeken, A., von Brackel, W., Wang, Y., Wen, T.C., Xu, J.C., Yan, J.Y., Zhao, R.L. & Camporesi, E. (2015) Fungal
diversity notes 1–110: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal species. Fungal Diversity 72: 1–197.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0324-y
Mugambi, G.K. & Huhndorf, S.M. (2009) Parallel evolution of hysterothecial ascomata in ascolocularous fungi (Ascomycota, Fungi).
Systematics and Biodiversity 7: 453–464.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S147720000999020X
Nylander, J.A.A. (2004) MrModeltest 2.0. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University
Pattengale, N.D., Alipour, M., Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P., Moret, B.M.E. & Stamatakis, A. (2009) How many bootstrap replicates are
necessary? LNCS 5541, 184–200. Journal of Computational Biology 17 (3): 337–354.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2009.0179
Phookamsak, R., Liu, J.K., Chukeatirote, E., McKenzie, E.H.C. & Hyde, K.D. (2013) Phylogeny and morphology of Leptosphaerulina
saccharicola sp. nov. and Pleosphaerulina oryzae and relationships with Pithomyces. Cryptogamie Mycologie 34: 303–319.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7872/crym.v34.iss4.2013.303
Phookamsak, R., Norphanphoun, C., Tanaka, K., Dai, D.Q.,Luo, Z.L., Liu, J.K., Su, H.Y., Bhat, D.J., Bahkali, A.H., Mortimer, P.E.,
Xu, J.C. & Hyde, K.D. (2015) A natural classification of Astrosphaeriella-like species; introducing Astrosphaeriellaceae and
Pseudoastrosphaeriellaceae fam. nov. and Astrosphaeriellopsis, gen. nov. Fungal Diversity 74 (1): 143–197.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0352-7
Rannala, B. & Yang, Z. (1996) Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. Journal
of Molecular Evolution 43: 304–311.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02338839
Rehner, S. (2001) Primers for Elongation Factor 1-α (EF1- α).
Silvestro, D. & Michalak, I. (2011) raxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 12 (4): 335–337.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0
Schoch, C.L., Crous, P.W., Groenewald, J.Z., Boehm, E.W.A., Burgess, T.I., de Gruyter, J., de Hoog, G.S., Dixon, L.J., Grube, M.,
Gueidan,C., Harada, Y., Hatakeyama, S., Hirayama, K., Hosoya, T., Huhndorf, S.M., Hyde, K.D., Jones, E.B.G., Kohlmeyer, J.,
Kruys, Å., Li, Y.M., Lücking, R., Lumbsch, H.T., ,Marvanová, L., Mbatchou, J.S., ,McVay, A.H., Miller, A.N., Mugambi, G.K.,
Muggia, L., Nelsen, M.P., Nelson, P., Owensby, C.A., Phillips, A.J.L., Phongpaichit, S., Pointing, S.B., Pujade-Renaud, V., Raja,
H.A., Rivas Plata, E., Robbertse, B., Ruibal, C., Sakayaroj, J., Sano, T., Selbmann, L., Shearer, C.A., Shirouzu, T., Slippers, B.,
Suetrong, S., Tanaka, K., Volkmann-Kohlmeyer, B., Wingfield, M.J., Wood, A.R., Woudenberg, J.H.C., Yonezawa, H., Zhang Y &
Spatafora, J.W. (2009) A class–wide phylogenetic assessment of Dothideomycetes. Studies in Mycology 64: 1–15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3114/sim.2009.64.01
Vilgalys, R. & Hester, M. (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several
Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246.
White, T.J., Bruns, T.D., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics.
PCR Protocols: Guide Methods Application 18: 315–322.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
Wijayawardene, D.N.N., Crous, P.W., Kirk, P.M., Hawksworth, D.L., Boonmee, S., Braun, U., Chomnunti, P., Dai, D.Q., D’souza, M.J.,
Diederich, P., Dissanayake, A., Doilom, M., Hongsanan, S., Jones, E.B.G., Groenewald, J.Z., Jayawardena, R., Lawrey, J.D., Liu,
J.K., Lücking, R., Madrid, H., Manamgoda, D.S., Muggia, L., Nelsen, M.P., Phookamsak, R., Suetrong, S., Tanaka, K., Thambugala,
K.M., Wikee, S., Zhang, Y., Aptroot, A., Ariyawansa, H.A., Bahkali, A.H., Bhat, J.D., Gueidan, C., De-Hoog, G.S., Knudsen, K.,
Mckenzie, E.H.C., Miller, A.N., Mortimer, P.E., Wanasinghe, D.N., Phillips, A.J.L., Raja, H.A., Slippers, B., Shivas, R.S., Taylor, J.E.,
Wang, Y., Woudenberg, J.H.C., Piątek, M., Cai, L., Jaklitsch, W.M. & Hyde, K.D. (2014) Naming and outline of Dothideomycetes
2014 including proposals for the protection or suppression of generic names. Fungal Diversity 69: 1–55.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-014-0309-2
Zhang, Y., Crous, P.W., Schoch, C.L. & Hyde, K.D. (2012) Pleosporales. Fungal Diversity 53: 1–221.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-011-0117-x
Zhaxybayeva, O. & Gogarten, J.P. (2002) Bootstrap, Bayesian probability and maximum likelihood mapping: exploring new tools for
comparative genome analyses. BMC Genomics 3 (1): 4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-3-4
Zogg, H. (1962) Die Hysteriaceae s. str. und Lophiaceae, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der mitteleuropäischen Formen. Beiträge zur
Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz, Band 11: 1–190.