Content uploaded by Abla Elhartiti
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Abla Elhartiti on May 29, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 4, ISSUE 12, DECEMBER 2015 ISSN 2277-8616
36
IJSTR©2015
www.ijstr.org
Antagonistic Activity Of Endophytic Bacteria
Isolated From Mentha Rotundifolia L.
Elhartiti Abla, Elhabchi Souad, Hichar Abdelhadi, Omar Bazdi, Ounine Khadija
Abstract: This study is implemented for the isolation, purification and identification of endophytic bacteria which produces antifungal substances from
the roots of Mentha rotundifolia L. The 59 obtained bacterial isolates were tested for their antagonistic activity by the dual confrontation against the
phytopathogenic fungi Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus Niger and Botrytis cinerea. Eight bacterial strains were selected for their strong antifungal
activity. These are strains M21, M23, M3a, M4, M14d and M3c which belong to the family Bacillaceae, M12 and M3b which belongs to the family of
Pseudomonadaceae. Among these, three bacterial strains namely M21, M23 and M12 induce 70% of inhibition of mycelial growth of phytopathogenic
fungi Fusarium oxysporum and Aspergillus Niger while the five bacterial strains M3a, M3c, M3b, M4 and M14d have proved to be effective in inhibiting
more than 60% of mycelial growth of Botrytis cinerea.
Keywords: Bacteria endophytic, Bacillaceae, Pseudomonadaceae, antagonistic activity, Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus niger, Botrytis cinerea
————————————————————
1 INTRODUCTION
More than two hundred species of dicots plants and
monocots are likely to be attacked by pathogenic fungi
Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus Niger and Botrytis
cinerea. Responsible for the significant economic losses on
cultures before and after the harvest [1, 2, 3]. The biological
control is a promising alternative [4]. Indeed, the endophytic
bacteria may be used for landing in the misuse of chemicals
[5]. The objective of this study is to isolate bacteria
endophytes of Mentha rotundifolia L. and to compare them
with mycelium phytopathogenic (F.oxysporume. A.niger and
B.cinerea).
2 MATERIEL ET METHODES
2.1 Isolation and purification of endophytic bacteria
of Mentha rotundifolia L.
The root samples of the plant Mentha rotundifolia L. were
taken at Ouled Amar parcels located in the region of Gharb
Chrarda Beni Hssen, Morocco.Ten grams of roots were
sterilized in the surface with sodium hypochlorite at 1% for
90 seconds, rinsed several times with sterile distilled water,
and ground in the physiological water for 60s. Depositing
0.5 ml of the dilution 1/10 then plated on Petri dishes
containing the agar medium. The incubation is performed at
28 ° C for 48h. The purity of the strains was checked by
successive subculture on agar medium. The purified
bacteria are then stocked at -20 ° C in flasks containing
nutrient broth of 20% of glycerol.
2.2 The antagonist activity of bacterial isolates in
vitro
Bacterial isolates were tested for antagonism against
Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus Niger and Botrytis cinerea
on the PDA by the dual culture technique [6].The bacterial
strains are inoculated in rectilinear streaks at opposite ends
of the medium. A cylinder of 4 mm in diameter mycelium
phytopathogenic is deposited in the center of the Petri dish.
The control contains only a phytopathogenic fungi washer.
The petri dish were incubated at 28 ° C. the inhibition of
mycelial growth was observed after five or seven days. The
percentage of the mycelial growth is estimated by the
formula:
(%) = Inhibition= ( – )/ * 100 [7]
- : maximum radial distance fungus growth.
- : radial distance on a line towards the antagonist.
2 Biochemical identification of isolated bacteria of
Mentha rotundifolia L.
The bacterial isolates were identified based on the
characters of the cultural tests, morphological, and
biochemical: the Gram reaction, respiratory-type with
catalase and oxidase etc. as described in the manual of
Bergey's bacteriology 2001 [8].
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 The antagonistic activity of bacterial isolates in
vitro
From the roots of Mentha rotundifolia L, we isolated and
purified 59 bacterial strains. Among them 17 induce an
inhibition of growth of F.oxysporum, A. Niger and B.cinerea.
(Table I).
__________________
Elhartiti Abla, Elhabchi Souad, Hichar Abdelhadi,
Omar Bazdi, Ounine Khadija
Laboratory of biology and Health, Applied
Microbiology Team; Faculty of Sciences Ibn Tofail
University B.P: 133 14000, Kénitra- MOROCCO.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 4, ISSUE 12, DECEMBER 2015 ISSN 2277-8616
37
IJSTR©2015
www.ijstr.org
Table 1: Percentage of inhibition of Fusarium oxysporum (F.o), Aspergillus Niger (A.n) and Botrytis cinerea (B.c) by the
isolated bacteria of Mentha rotundifolia L.
We find that 17, 16 and 12 isolated strains have induce an
inhibition of F.oxysporum, A. Niger and B.cinerea
respectively with a percentage of inhibition higher than 30%.
The strains M21, M23 and M12 are remarkably effective.
They have trained the inhibition of mycelial growth
F.oxysporum and A. Niger with a higher percentage of 70%
(Figure 1 and Figure 2). while the five other isolates M3a,
M3c, M3b, M4 and M14d shown their effectiveness by
inhibiting superior 60% of mycelial growth of B.cinerea
(Figure 3)
Figure 1: Effects of bacterial isolates M23, M21 and M12 on
mycelium growth of Fusarium oxysporum.
Figure 2: Effects of bacterial isolates M23, M21 and the
M12 on the mycelium growth of Aspergillus Niger
strains
% inhibition of mycelial growth
F.o
A.n
B.c
control
0
0
0
M6a
39,47
37,5
11,11
M16c
40,78
31,25
22,22
M14e
57,89
68,75
57,77
M14c
60,52
75
56,36
M7a
64,47
66,25
45,45
M3a
67,10
65
67,27
M3c
63,15
62,50
63,63
M4
67,10
65
60
M14d
53,94
66,25
63,63
M21
75
76,25
56,36
M23
73,68
75
52,72
M12
70,52
77,5
54,54
M3b
67,10
68,75
60
M5b
67,10
57,5
36,36
M2b
60,52
66,25
16,36
M9b
47,36
50
18,18
M3d
30,26
12,25
7,27
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 4, ISSUE 12, DECEMBER 2015 ISSN 2277-8616
38
IJSTR©2015
www.ijstr.org
Figure 3: Effects of bacterial isolates M3b, M3a, M3c,
M14D and M4 on the mycelium growth of Botrytis cinerea
3 Biochemical identification of endophytic
bacteria isolated from Mentha rotundifolia L.
The 17 strains induced an inhibition of mycelial growth of
phytopathogenic fungi three F. oxysporum, A. Niger and
B.cinerea they are divided in two groups according to their
Gram stain (Tables 2 and 3). They are strictly aerobic bacilli
of oxidase and catalase positive, and they are all capable of
reducing the nitrate to nitrite or ammonia but unable to
produce H2S.
Tableaux 2: biochemical and physiological characters of Gram positive isolates isolated from de Mentha rotundifolia L.
Strains
Test
M3a
M4
M6a
M7a
M14c
M14e
M14d
M3c
M16c
M21
M23
Mobility
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
Mannitol
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
Glucose
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Lactose
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
Methyl red
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
Voges Proskauer
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
Gelatinase
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
casein hydrolysate
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
starch hydrolysate
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
Among the 11 Gram positive strains, nine are sporulation. They belong to Bacillaceae family. The two other bacterial strains are
not acid-resistant and are non-sporulation. They are unable hydrolyze the starch. Which specifies as Corynebacterium xerosis.
Tables 3: biochemical and physiological characters of Gram-negative isolates isolated from de Mentha rotundifolia L.
strains
Test
M5b
M9b
M2b
M3b
M12
M3d
Citrate
+
+
+
-
+
-
Mobility
+
+
-
+
+
+
Mannitol
-
+
-
+
+
-
Lactose
-
-
-
+
-
-
Methyl red
+
+
+
-
+
-
Voges Proskauer
-
-
-
+
-
+
Gelatinase
+
+
-
+
+
-
casein hydrolysate
-
+
-
+
-
-
starch hydrolysate
-
-
-
+
+
-
The six bacterial Gram-negative isolates belong to
Pseudomonadaceae family. The bacterial isolates M21,
M23, M3a, M4, M14d and M3c belong to the Bacillaceae
family. Among these strains, M21 and M23 induced an
inhibition of mycelial growth greater than 70% of
F.oxysporum and A. Niger while the other strains M3a, M4,
M3c and M14d inhibited 60% of the mycelium growth
B.cinerea. These results are in agreement with those left by
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 4, ISSUE 12, DECEMBER 2015 ISSN 2277-8616
39
IJSTR©2015
www.ijstr.org
Nourozian [9], Munimbazi and Bullerman [10] who showed
that the Bacillus sp have a strong potential of inhibition of
mycelium growth of many Aspergillus and Fusarium species
Also Sadfi-Zouaoui [11] found that the Bacillus sp. were
antagonistic to B.cinerea. In previous researches, some
strains of Bacillus sp, such as Bacillus subtilis, played an
important role in the biological control of fungal diseases of
post-harvest and the production of antibiotics [12]. M12 and
M3b are Pseudomonadaceae which induce an inhibition
rate higher than 70 % against the phytopathogenic fungi
F.oxysporum and A.niger for M12. Thus, the strain M3b
induced an inhibition superior than 60% against B.cinerea.
This is in agreement with a description that which was made
by several authors who described the successful control of
the Aspergillus flavus by the antagonistic Pseudomonas
fluorescens [13, 14]. Srivastava and Shalni [15] also
reported the antifungal potential of Pseudomonas
fluorescens against the pathogenic fungus, Fusarium sp.
Paez et al [16] have indicated that Pseudomonas putida
and Pseudomonas aeruginosa had great antagonistic
effects on B.cinerea.
4 CONCLUSION
From these results, we can conclude that the bacterial
strains M21, M23, M3a, M4, M14d and M3c belong to the
Bacillaceae family, M12 and M3b belong to the
Pseudomondasea family have an inhibitory effect on the
phytopathogenic fungi Fusarium oxysporum, Niger
Aspergillus and Botrytis cinerea, and therefore can serve as
a biological control agent.
REFERENCES
[1] Rosslenbroich H. J. et Stuebler D. 2000.Botrytis
cinerea – history of chemical control and novel
fungicides for its management. Crop Prot., 19, 557-
561.
[2] Gudelj I., Fitt B. D. L. et van den Bosch F. 2004.
Evolution of sibling fungal plant pathogens in
relation to host specialization, Phytopathol., 94,
789-795.
[3] Hubert J., Stejskal V., Munzbergova Z., Kubatova
A., Vanova M. et Zdarkova E. 2005. Mites and
fungi in heavily infested stores in the Czech
Republic, J. Econ. Entomol., 97, 2144-2153.
[4] Lin L, Qiao YS, Ju ZY, Ma CW, Liu YH, Zhou YJ,
Dong HS 2009. Isolation and characterization of
endophytic Bacillus subtilis Jaas ed1 antagonist of
eggplant Verticillium wilt. Biosci Biotechnol
Biochem 73:1489-1493.
[5] Moenne.Loccoz., Y., Powell, J., Higgins, P.,
McCarthy, J., O´Gara, F.1998. An investigation of
the impact of biocontrol Pseudomonas Fluorescens
F113 on the growth of sugar beet the performance
of subsequent clover-Rhizobium symbiosis.
Appl.Soil.Ecol. 7, pp.225-237.
[6] Zhao LF, Deng ZS, Yang WQ, Cao Y, Wang ET,
Wei GH (2010). Diverse rhizobia associated with
Sophora alopecuroides grown in different regions
of Loess Plateau in China. Syst Appl Microbiol
33:468-477.
[7] Wang S.L., Hsaiao W.J., Chang W.T. et al., 2002.
Purification and characterization of an antimicrobial
chitinase extracellularly produces by monoscus
purpureus CCR 31499 in a shrimp and crab shell
powder medium. J.Aric.Food.Chem., 50: 2249-
2255
[8] Bergey´s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2001,
second ed.
[9] Nourozian, J., H.R. Etebarian and G.
Khodakaramian, 2006. Biological control of
Fusarium graminearum on wheat by antagonistic
bacteria, Songklanakarin J. 19. Sci. and Technol.,
28: 29-38.
[10] Munimbazi, C. and L.B. Bullerman, 1998. Isolation
and partial characterization of antifungal
metabolites of Bacillus pumilus. J. Appl. Microbiol.,
84: 959-968.
[11] Sadfi-Zouaoui N., Essghaier B., Hannachi I.,
Hajlaoui M.R and Boudabous A. 2007. First report
on the use of moderately halophilic bacteria
against stem canker of greenhouse tomatoes
caused by Botrytis cinerea. Ann. Microbiol. 57(3) :
337-339.
[12] Toure, Y., Ongene, M., Jacques, P.,Guiro, A.,
Thonart, P., 2004. Role of lipopeptides produced by
Bacillus subtilis GA1 in the reduction of grey mould
disease caused by botrytis cinerea on apple.
Journal of Applied Microbiology 96, 1151-1160.
[13] Jeffrey, D., L. Palumbo, James, Baker, E. Noreen
and Mahoney, 2006. Isolation of Bacterial
Antagonists of Aspergillus flavus from Almonds,
Microbial Ecol., 52(1): 45-52.
[14] Palumbo, J.D., T.L. O’Keeffe and H.K. Abbas,
2007. Isolation of maize soil and rhizosphere
bacteria with antagonistic activity Aspergillus flavus
and Fusarium verticillioides, J. Food Protection, 70:
1615-1621.
[15] Srivastava, R. and Shalni, 2008. Antifungal Activity
8. Pseudomonas fluorescence Against Different
Plant Pathogenic Fungi, Electronic J.
Environmental, Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 7:
2789-2796.
[16] Paez, M., Martienz-Nieto, P., Bernal-Castillo, J.,
2005. Siderophore producing Pseudomonas and
pathogenic Rhizoctonia solani and Botrytis cinerea
antagonists. Univ. Sci. 10, 65-74.