Content uploaded by Francisco Paz
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Francisco Paz on Apr 20, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
18/4/2016 Dirección Estratégica » Benefits of Normative Commitment for Organizations » Print
http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en/beneficios-del-compromiso-normativo-para-las-organizaciones/print/ 1/4
DirecciónEstratégicahttp://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en
BenefitsofNormativeCommitmentforOrganizations
PostedByadminOn1deSeptember,2011@1:30pmInEdition38,HumanResources|No
Comments
ByNormaBetanzosDíaz(1),andFranciscoPazRodríguez(2)
Organizational commitment is an issue that has become increasingly important for human
resources experts, because it is crucial for a company’s employees to “wear the team colors,”
meaning they love their company and do their jobs well (Arciniega, 2002). It is therefore
importanttounderstandthenature,developmentandimplicationsofemployeecommitment.
Weknowthattherearedifferenttypesofcommitment(affective,continuanceandnormative),
andthateachofthesehasadifferenteffectonemployeebehaviorandattitudes.
Whathappenswhenacompanyencountershardtimes?Whenit has the wrong leaders? When
the climate makes it difficult to work? When employee bonuses cannot be paid, or economic
crisis makes wages less appealing to workers? The company needs committed employees to
obtaincompetitiveadvantages,butitoftenintroduceschangesintheguiseofefficiency(layoffs,
restructuring,mergers,flextime,etc.).
All of this can often weaken the commitment of a company’s employees, diminishing or even
destroyingtheiraffectionforthecompanyandloweringtheirproductivitylevels.Theymayfindit
more attractive to change jobs in search of better conditions, and the commitment ends. The
employeeisreadytoleavethecompany;nothingisholdingthemback.
To prevent employees from abandoning their commitment to the company, it is important to
builduptheirtiestotheorganization.Oneoptionistoestablishastrongnormativecommitment
(whichhas been little studied to date).This commitment strengthens employee retention even
when the organization faces adverse circumstances. In extreme cases, for example, when the
companyisfacingbankruptcy,employeesmaysacrificetheir revenuesand benefitsandstayon
tothebitter end because,asWiener(1982) putsit,“theybelievethat itistheright and moral
thing to do”. This creates a stabilizing force that can keep employee behavior on course when
organizationalconditionschange.
Thisbehaviorisdifferentfromaffectivecommitment(anemotionalbondwiththecompany)and
continuitycommitment(basedoneconomicgains).Employeesgainasenseofobligationthrough
their experiences with the organization. In some cultures, intense feelings of normative
commitmentsare encouraged.InJapan,forexample, employeesformalongtermcommitment
totheircompany and remainwithitin good timesandinbad, because theircommitmentdoes
notdependoncircumstances,butratheronapersonaldecisiontheyhavemade.
Individualsincollectivistcultures(likeBrazil)seetheirobligationsassomethingtheywanttodo,
rather than an imposed duty, and they feel satisfied and successful in their jobs, while
individualist cultures (like United States) inculcate the moral duty of doing one’s job. So
obligationsareexperienced indifferentwaysfrom countrytocountry,and therefore,theyhave
differentimplicationsfortheworker’sjobperformanceandyield.
18/4/2016 Dirección Estratégica » Benefits of Normative Commitment for Organizations » Print
http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en/beneficios-del-compromiso-normativo-para-las-organizaciones/print/ 2/4
In Mexico, we conducted qualitative research with focus groups made up of 25 workers from
various companies, in order to describe ideas about what they think about normative
commitment. We found two categories of this commitment: a) normative commitment and b)
moralcommitment(RodriguezandBetanzos,2011).
Thenormativecomponentofcommitmentisexperiencedasthedutytoobeyorganizationalrules
and policies regarding the job but employee must do. This commitment is assumed out of
conviction and free will, not obligation. It is assumed as an important value and is the
responsibilityofeach individual,independentofthe organization,becauseitis avalueacquired
andnurturedinthefamilyhomeandbecomespartoftheindividual’spersonality.Respectingthis
commitmentisapersonalneed.
Workersthatdo notconformtoestablished policiesanddutiesmay becomesubjecttoexternal
sanctionsagainstthem. Theymayalsoface internalsanctions–likevaluejudgments abouttheir
performanceinthecompany–thatmakethemfeelbadly.
“Thereisnoharsherjudgethantheoneweallhaveinside,meaningwhenyouknowyou’re
failingandyoufeelremorse[…],becauseyouarefailingyourself…”
Unlike normative commitment, with moral commitment, workers understand that, besides the
opportunity to work, they obtain benefits from their organization that binds them to it morally
and that, as such, they must reciprocate and return these benefits. On the other hand, this
reciprocity and retribution could be negative if workers feel they are not receiving a fair
treatment or that the labor relationship is not an equitable one, which causes them to behave
negativelytowardtheirjobsortobedisloyaltotheorganization.
Inaddition, workershavecertainexpectationsthatthecompany willcompensatethemfortheir
work and efforts. Trusting in this relationship, workers strive to repay the company for the
benefitsreceived,sothattheydonotfeelindebted.Finally,thismoralbondbetweentheworker
and the organization is expressed as loyalty and permanence, even if there are better
opportunitieselsewhere.
1Dra.enPsicología.UniversidadAutónomadelEstadodeMorelos.México.
2Dr.enPsicología.InstitutoNacionaldeNeurologíayNeurocirugía“ManuelVelascoSuárez”.
México.
“Thisbondthat,onapersonallevel,Iformedwiththisinstitution[…],thisloyaltyis[…],in
someway,a repayment foreverythingithas given me[and]otherthings that […]forme
areevenmorevaluablethanmoney.”
Loyalty is also expressed as a concern for the company’s wellbeing and protection of its
interests.
“Theywerepeoplethatputin for [worked] fifteen minutes and they were paidforhalfan
hour.Fifteen minutesyou’dloseinchangingclothes,neatening up,goingtothebathroom,
andwhenyou’renotgenerating,Imean,you’rejeopardizingallofthis[thecompany].”
Normative commitment, on the other hand, seems to be more a characteristic or value that
employees acquire in the social group where they were formed (family, schools, friends) and
whichinspiresthemtokeeptheircommitments.InMexicanculture,thisiswhatcomescloserto
theconceptofjobresponsibility.ForaMexicanemployee,responsibilityanddutyareaninterest
inand concernforothers,apersonal quality,likevirtueandconscience. Mexicansconsideritto
beabasicdimensionofsocialrelations,andtherefore,responsibilityisconsideredapositivetrait
fortheindividual(DíazGuerreroandSzalay,1993).
In their recent review of this variable, Meyer and Parfyonova (2010) find employees with a
strongnormativeandaffectivecommitmentaremorelikelytoexpressadesiretodotheright
thingaccordingtotheirmoralstandards,whichinthelongrunproducespositiveeffects,bothfor
the employee and for the organization (intention of staying with the company, support for
change,andthewellbeing ofworkers).Asolidnormativeandcontinuance commitmentreveals
howemployeesbehavewithregardtotheirobligationtorepayadebt(todosomethingtoavoid
thesocialcosts).
18/4/2016 Dirección Estratégica » Benefits of Normative Commitment for Organizations » Print
http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en/beneficios-del-compromiso-normativo-para-las-organizaciones/print/ 3/4
Personal values and principles are vitally important for normative commitment, because they
guaranteethatworkerswilldotheirjobthoroughly,inkeepingwiththeorganizationalstandards
andguidelines,withouttheneedforconstantsupervision.
On the other hand, it seems that when workers receive benefits or facilities from their
organizationsthatarenot stipulated inthecontract,theytendto correspond bychangingtheir
behavioron the job and making agreater effort to avoid betraying thetrust the company has
placed in them. This creates a virtually unbreakable bond with the organization and stronger
even than the economic benefits or the affective bond. It goes back to the reciprocity that is
latentin all spheres of social interaction and, as such,is universal. It is a standard that is not
imposed,but whichdeterminestheactionsthatwillbetakeninrecompenseforcertain benefits
received.Trustalso playsacrucialrole, sincewithoutit,this relationshipwouldnotbe possible
(RodriguezandBetanzos,2001).
Thecompanyshowsitstrustintheworkerbycommunicatingmaterialinformationthatmakesit
vulnerable. Employees’ normative commitment is what makes then behave with loyalty,
discretionandconfidentiality,toavoidactingthedetrimentoftheirorganization.Thisloyaltyalso
facilitatesrelationshipsinworkgroups,sincetheemployeewillsupportdecisionsthatbenefitthe
company,butalsothepeoplethatworkthere.
In this exercise of understanding, we believe there is enough evidence to sustain that the
normativecommitmentscanbeinterpretedasstemmingfromamatureacceptanceofapractical
dailybelief,notintellectuallyelaborated,thatwearewhatwedo.Wedothingswell,evenbetter
thanwhatisrequiredofus, not to be exemplary employees, butrathertofeelgoodaboutthe
performanceofthetasksentrustedto usandsatisfiedathavingfulfilledourresponsibilitiesand
duties.
We know that commitment is multidimensional, as is the contractual relationship and daily
interactionsinthecompany.Ifweexaminedthesedimensionsfromtheperspectiveofnormative
commitment,theyareintertwinedinasinglediscourse.
León (2009) explains that experiencing one’s ties to the organization as a moral contract that
bindstheemployeealsocreatestheconditionsforcriticalattitudetowardthecompanywhenthe
employeedoes notfeelithaskeptupitsend ofthedeal.Normativecommitment alsotakeson
thedimensionofresponsibility toward what we do,inotherwords,todo the job right, without
defects.Therefore,normative commitment createsadditionalmotivationforproducing a quality
product,andthereisnomoreimportantgoalforworkers.Iftheyfail,iftheresultsdonotcome
out as expected, they feel guilt and shame. In short, we find a commitment based on shared
beliefs of what makes a “good worker,” a “responsible worker.” Thus, normative commitment
bringssignificantbenefitstoanorganization,butalsoimpliesthattherelationshipmustbemore
balanced in order to maintain this reciprocity between the company and the workers, in which
bothhavesomethingtogain.♦
References
Arciniega,L.M.(2002).CompromisoOrganizacionalenMéxico:¿Cómohacerquelagente
sepongalacamiseta?DirecciónEstratégica,2,2123.
DíazGuerrero, R. and Szalay, L.B. (1993). El mundo subjetivo de mexicanos y
norteamericanos.México:Trillas,pp.151163.
León, F. J. (2009). El compromiso limitado. Un estudio sobre las razones estratégicas e
identitarias de las acciones de resistencia y compromiso en el trabajo. Cuadernos de
RelacionesLaborales,27;2:115143.
Meyer, J. P. and Parfyonova, N. M. (2010). Normative commitment in the workplace: A
theoreticalanalysisandreconceptualization.HumanResourceManagementReview.
Rodríguez, L. C. S. and Betanzos D. N. (2011). Vinculación entre empleado y empresa:
analizando el constructo compromiso organizacional normativo en el trabajo. XVI
Congreso Internacional de Contaduría, Administración e Informática. UNAM. ISBN: 978
6070225482
Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of
ManagementReview,7:418−428.
(Visited7,756times,9visitstoday)
18/4/2016 Dirección Estratégica » Benefits of Normative Commitment for Organizations » Print
http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en/beneficios-del-compromiso-normativo-para-las-organizaciones/print/ 4/4
ArticleprintedfromDirecciónEstratégica:http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en
URLtoarticle:http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en/beneficiosdelcompromiso
normativoparalasorganizaciones/
DerechosReservados©ITAM,2005.RíoHondoNo.1,Col.ProgresoTizapán,México,D.F.