ArticlePDF Available
18/4/2016 Dirección Estratégica » Benefits of Normative Commitment for Organizations » Print
http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en/beneficios-del-compromiso-normativo-para-las-organizaciones/print/ 1/4
DirecciónEstratégicahttp://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en
BenefitsofNormativeCommitmentforOrganizations
PostedByadminOn1deSeptember,2011@1:30pmInEdition38,HumanResources|No
Comments
ByNormaBetanzosDíaz(1),andFranciscoPazRodríguez(2)
Organizational commitment is an issue that has become increasingly important for human
resources experts, because it is crucial for a company’s employees to “wear the team colors,”
meaning they love their company and do their jobs well (Arciniega, 2002). It is therefore
importanttounderstandthenature,developmentandimplicationsofemployeecommitment.
Weknowthattherearedifferenttypesofcommitment(affective,continuanceandnormative),
andthateachofthesehasadifferenteffectonemployeebehaviorandattitudes.
Whathappenswhenacompanyencountershardtimes?Whenit has the wrong leaders? When
the climate makes it difficult to work? When employee bonuses cannot be paid, or economic
crisis makes wages less appealing to workers? The company needs committed employees to
obtaincompetitiveadvantages,butitoftenintroduceschangesintheguiseofefficiency(layoffs,
restructuring,mergers,flextime,etc.).
All of this can often weaken the commitment of a company’s employees, diminishing or even
destroyingtheiraffectionforthecompanyandloweringtheirproductivitylevels.Theymayfindit
more attractive to change jobs in search of better conditions, and the commitment ends. The
employeeisreadytoleavethecompany;nothingisholdingthemback.
To prevent employees from abandoning their commitment to the company, it is important to
builduptheirtiestotheorganization.Oneoptionistoestablishastrongnormativecommitment
(whichhas been little studied to date).This commitment strengthens employee retention even
when the organization faces adverse circumstances. In extreme cases, for example, when the
companyisfacingbankruptcy,employeesmaysacrificetheir revenuesand benefitsandstayon
tothebitter end because,asWiener(1982) putsit,“theybelievethat itistheright and moral
thing to do”. This creates a stabilizing force that can keep employee behavior on course when
organizationalconditionschange.
Thisbehaviorisdifferentfromaffectivecommitment(anemotionalbondwiththecompany)and
continuitycommitment(basedoneconomicgains).Employeesgainasenseofobligationthrough
their experiences with the organization. In some cultures, intense feelings of normative
commitmentsare encouraged.InJapan,forexample, employeesformalongtermcommitment
totheircompany and remainwithitin good timesandinbad, because theircommitmentdoes
notdependoncircumstances,butratheronapersonaldecisiontheyhavemade.
Individualsincollectivistcultures(likeBrazil)seetheirobligationsassomethingtheywanttodo,
rather than an imposed duty, and they feel satisfied and successful in their jobs, while
individualist cultures (like United States) inculcate the moral duty of doing one’s job. So
obligationsareexperienced indifferentwaysfrom countrytocountry,and therefore,theyhave
differentimplicationsfortheworker’sjobperformanceandyield.
18/4/2016 Dirección Estratégica » Benefits of Normative Commitment for Organizations » Print
http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en/beneficios-del-compromiso-normativo-para-las-organizaciones/print/ 2/4
In Mexico, we conducted qualitative research with focus groups made up of 25 workers from
various companies, in order to describe ideas about what they think about normative
commitment. We found two categories of this commitment: a) normative commitment and b)
moralcommitment(RodriguezandBetanzos,2011).
Thenormativecomponentofcommitmentisexperiencedasthedutytoobeyorganizationalrules
and policies regarding the job but employee must do. This commitment is assumed out of
conviction and free will, not obligation. It is assumed as an important value and is the
responsibilityofeach individual,independentofthe organization,becauseitis avalueacquired
andnurturedinthefamilyhomeandbecomespartoftheindividual’spersonality.Respectingthis
commitmentisapersonalneed.
Workersthatdo notconformtoestablished policiesanddutiesmay becomesubjecttoexternal
sanctionsagainstthem. Theymayalsoface internalsanctions–likevaluejudgments abouttheir
performanceinthecompany–thatmakethemfeelbadly.
“Thereisnoharsherjudgethantheoneweallhaveinside,meaningwhenyouknowyou’re
failingandyoufeelremorse[…],becauseyouarefailingyourself…”
Unlike normative commitment, with moral commitment, workers understand that, besides the
opportunity to work, they obtain benefits from their organization that binds them to it morally
and that, as such, they must reciprocate and return these benefits. On the other hand, this
reciprocity and retribution could be negative if workers feel they are not receiving a fair
treatment or that the labor relationship is not an equitable one, which causes them to behave
negativelytowardtheirjobsortobedisloyaltotheorganization.
Inaddition, workershavecertainexpectationsthatthecompany willcompensatethemfortheir
work and efforts. Trusting in this relationship, workers strive to repay the company for the
benefitsreceived,sothattheydonotfeelindebted.Finally,thismoralbondbetweentheworker
and the organization is expressed as loyalty and permanence, even if there are better
opportunitieselsewhere.
1Dra.enPsicología.UniversidadAutónomadelEstadodeMorelos.México.
2Dr.enPsicología.InstitutoNacionaldeNeurologíayNeurocirugía“ManuelVelascoSuárez”.
México.
“Thisbondthat,onapersonallevel,Iformedwiththisinstitution[…],thisloyaltyis[…],in
someway,a repayment foreverythingithas given me[and]otherthings that […]forme
areevenmorevaluablethanmoney.”
Loyalty is also expressed as a concern for the company’s wellbeing and protection of its
interests.
“Theywerepeoplethatputin for [worked] fifteen minutes and they were paidforhalfan
hour.Fifteen minutesyou’dloseinchangingclothes,neatening up,goingtothebathroom,
andwhenyou’renotgenerating,Imean,you’rejeopardizingallofthis[thecompany].”
Normative commitment, on the other hand, seems to be more a characteristic or value that
employees acquire in the social group where they were formed (family, schools, friends) and
whichinspiresthemtokeeptheircommitments.InMexicanculture,thisiswhatcomescloserto
theconceptofjobresponsibility.ForaMexicanemployee,responsibilityanddutyareaninterest
inand concernforothers,apersonal quality,likevirtueandconscience. Mexicansconsideritto
beabasicdimensionofsocialrelations,andtherefore,responsibilityisconsideredapositivetrait
fortheindividual(DíazGuerreroandSzalay,1993).
In their recent review of this variable, Meyer and Parfyonova (2010) find employees with a
strongnormativeandaffectivecommitmentaremorelikelytoexpressadesiretodotheright
thingaccordingtotheirmoralstandards,whichinthelongrunproducespositiveeffects,bothfor
the employee and for the organization (intention of staying with the company, support for
change,andthewellbeing ofworkers).Asolidnormativeandcontinuance commitmentreveals
howemployeesbehavewithregardtotheirobligationtorepayadebt(todosomethingtoavoid
thesocialcosts).
18/4/2016 Dirección Estratégica » Benefits of Normative Commitment for Organizations » Print
http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en/beneficios-del-compromiso-normativo-para-las-organizaciones/print/ 3/4
Personal values and principles are vitally important for normative commitment, because they
guaranteethatworkerswilldotheirjobthoroughly,inkeepingwiththeorganizationalstandards
andguidelines,withouttheneedforconstantsupervision.
On the other hand, it seems that when workers receive benefits or facilities from their
organizationsthatarenot stipulated inthecontract,theytendto correspond bychangingtheir
behavioron the job and making agreater effort to avoid betraying thetrust the company has
placed in them. This creates a virtually unbreakable bond with the organization and stronger
even than the economic benefits or the affective bond. It goes back to the reciprocity that is
latentin all spheres of social interaction and, as such,is universal. It is a standard that is not
imposed,but whichdeterminestheactionsthatwillbetakeninrecompenseforcertain benefits
received.Trustalso playsacrucialrole, sincewithoutit,this relationshipwouldnotbe possible
(RodriguezandBetanzos,2001).
Thecompanyshowsitstrustintheworkerbycommunicatingmaterialinformationthatmakesit
vulnerable. Employees’ normative commitment is what makes then behave with loyalty,
discretionandconfidentiality,toavoidactingthedetrimentoftheirorganization.Thisloyaltyalso
facilitatesrelationshipsinworkgroups,sincetheemployeewillsupportdecisionsthatbenefitthe
company,butalsothepeoplethatworkthere.
In this exercise of understanding, we believe there is enough evidence to sustain that the
normativecommitmentscanbeinterpretedasstemmingfromamatureacceptanceofapractical
dailybelief,notintellectuallyelaborated,thatwearewhatwedo.Wedothingswell,evenbetter
thanwhatisrequiredofus, not to be exemplary employees, butrathertofeelgoodaboutthe
performanceofthetasksentrustedto usandsatisfiedathavingfulfilledourresponsibilitiesand
duties.
We know that commitment is multidimensional, as is the contractual relationship and daily
interactionsinthecompany.Ifweexaminedthesedimensionsfromtheperspectiveofnormative
commitment,theyareintertwinedinasinglediscourse.
León (2009) explains that experiencing one’s ties to the organization as a moral contract that
bindstheemployeealsocreatestheconditionsforcriticalattitudetowardthecompanywhenthe
employeedoes notfeelithaskeptupitsend ofthedeal.Normativecommitment alsotakeson
thedimensionofresponsibility toward what we do,inotherwords,todo the job right, without
defects.Therefore,normative commitment createsadditionalmotivationforproducing a quality
product,andthereisnomoreimportantgoalforworkers.Iftheyfail,iftheresultsdonotcome
out as expected, they feel guilt and shame. In short, we find a commitment based on shared
beliefs of what makes a “good worker,” a “responsible worker.” Thus, normative commitment
bringssignificantbenefitstoanorganization,butalsoimpliesthattherelationshipmustbemore
balanced in order to maintain this reciprocity between the company and the workers, in which
bothhavesomethingtogain.
References
Arciniega,L.M.(2002).CompromisoOrganizacionalenMéxico:¿Cómohacerquelagente
sepongalacamiseta?DirecciónEstratégica,2,2123.
DíazGuerrero, R. and Szalay, L.B. (1993). El mundo subjetivo de mexicanos y
norteamericanos.México:Trillas,pp.151163.
León, F. J. (2009). El compromiso limitado. Un estudio sobre las razones estratégicas e
identitarias de las acciones de resistencia y compromiso en el trabajo. Cuadernos de
RelacionesLaborales,27;2:115143.
Meyer, J. P. and Parfyonova, N. M. (2010). Normative commitment in the workplace: A
theoreticalanalysisandreconceptualization.HumanResourceManagementReview.
Rodríguez, L. C. S. and Betanzos D. N. (2011). Vinculación entre empleado y empresa:
analizando el constructo compromiso organizacional normativo en el trabajo. XVI
Congreso Internacional de Contaduría, Administración e Informática. UNAM. ISBN: 978
6070225482
Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of
ManagementReview,7:418−428.
(Visited7,756times,9visitstoday)
18/4/2016 Dirección Estratégica » Benefits of Normative Commitment for Organizations » Print
http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en/beneficios-del-compromiso-normativo-para-las-organizaciones/print/ 4/4
ArticleprintedfromDirecciónEstratégica:http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en
URLtoarticle:http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en/beneficiosdelcompromiso
normativoparalasorganizaciones/
DerechosReservados©ITAM,2005.RíoHondoNo.1,Col.ProgresoTizapán,México,D.F.
... According to [7, p. 6], normative commitment refers to the "moral obligation to continue working for the organisation". Employees remain with the organisation because they have an obligation towards the organisation [7] Recent studies show that normative commitment is experienced due to compliance to organisational policies and procedures [6]. Personal, social, and family values influence employees' loyalty to their affiliated organisations [6]. ...
... Employees remain with the organisation because they have an obligation towards the organisation [7] Recent studies show that normative commitment is experienced due to compliance to organisational policies and procedures [6]. Personal, social, and family values influence employees' loyalty to their affiliated organisations [6]. Normative commitment is strong on employees who feel indebted to the organisation for the opportunities and rewards provided [14,15]. ...
... Normative commitment influences employees to willingly behave in a manner that helps achieve organisational goals [20]. Employees who have strong normative commitment feel the need to do the right thing and comply with policies that contribute to the organisation's success [6]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Organisations continuously seek opportunities to be more productive through the human capital they employ. A firm offering of the employee value proposition (EVP) and understanding of employee commitment could enable organisations to have committed employees that enjoy their work and are oriented towards a growth trajectory. This study sought to examine the effect of the EVP on normative commitment in a parastatal organisation. A quantitative research approach was selected to explore the research objectives. The research instruments comprised of value attributes scale and normative commitment scale. The population sample consisted of employees (N=251). Convenience sampling was used within the context of the study. Descriptive statistics, Factory analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and Regression analysis were employed to interpret data collected and address the research objectives. A positive relationship between the variables was established. The three EVP factors (work, rewards, and opportunity) positively correlate with normative commitment. Recommendations are made to managers and HR Practitioners regarding the EVP and normative commitment of parastatal employees, which have the potential to employee commitment when implemented. The study provided insights on the factors, affecting EVP and normative commitment. The study also showed the relationship between the variables, enabling management, and HR practitioners to implement strategic interventions to influence employees' normative commitment and EVP experience.
Article
Full-text available
En este artículo presentamos un estudio de caso basado en dieciocho entrevistas realizadas a trabajadores de una multinacional automovilística. Frente a las concepciones dominantes en los estudios sobre el proceso de trabajo, sostendremos que, al menos para este caso, la combinación de acciones de resistencia y compromiso no puede interpretarse como manifestación de una subjetividad �colonizada� y �contradictoria�. Antes al contrario, los patrones obreros de conducta parecen resultar de una racionalidad basada en la identidad, y la decisión sobre la visibilidad o invisibilidad de cada una de estas prácticas parece resultar de una racionalidad estratégica. Nuestro estudio sugiere la necesidad de que los estudios etnográficos del proceso de trabajo partan del supuesto de la racionalidad de los agentes de la producción, aunque esa racionalidad pueda ser de distintos tipos y siempre condicionada por el contexto en el que se gesta y expresa.
Article
A model of work attitudes, distinguishing between normative and instrumental processes as behavioral determinants, serves as the framework within which commitment is conceptualized. Commitment is defined as the totality of internalized normative pressures to act in a way that meets organizational interests. Organizational identification and generalized values of loyalty and duty are viewed as its immediate determinants. Thus commitment can be influenced by both personal predispositions and organizational interventions. The role of recruitment, selection, and socialization in affecting members' commitment is discussed.
Article
Among the components of the Meyer and Allen's [Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 64-89] three-component model of organizational commitment, normative commitment (NC) has received the least attention. It is sometimes dismissed as a redundant construct that bears many similarities to affective commitment and does not explain work behaviors beyond other components. In this review, we seek to re-establish the theoretical and practical significance of NC. We argue that NC has a dual nature and that it manifests itself differently depending on the strength of other components in an employee's commitment profile. NC can be experienced either as a moral duty or a sense of indebtedness, each having different implications for work behavior. Drawing on theories of perceived organizational support, motivation, psychological contracts, leadership, and culture, the paper justifies the distinction between two "faces" of NC, delineates organizational factors that could promote a more positive interpretation of NC, and proposes an agenda for future research
Compromiso Organizacional en México: ¿Cómo hacer que la gente se ponga la camiseta? Dirección Estratégica
  • L M Arciniega
Arciniega, L.M. (2002). Compromiso Organizacional en México: ¿Cómo hacer que la gente se ponga la camiseta? Dirección Estratégica, 2, 21­23.
Vinculación entre empleado y empresa: analizando el constructo compromiso organizacional normativo en el trabajo
  • L C S Rodríguez
  • D N Betanzos
Rodríguez, L. C. S. and Betanzos D. N. (2011). Vinculación entre empleado y empresa: analizando el constructo compromiso organizacional normativo en el trabajo. XVI Congreso Internacional de Contaduría, Administración e Informática. UNAM. ISBN: 978­ 607­02­2548­2
Benefits of Normative Commitment for Organizations » Print http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en/beneficios-del-compromiso-normativo-para-las-organizaciones/print
  • Dirección Estratégica
Dirección Estratégica » Benefits of Normative Commitment for Organizations » Print http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en/beneficios-del-compromiso-normativo-para-las-organizaciones/print/ 4/4
Article printed from Dirección Estratégica: http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en URL to article: http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en
Article printed from Dirección Estratégica: http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en URL to article: http://direccionestrategica.itam.mx/en/beneficios­del­compromiso­ normativo­para­las­organizaciones/ Derechos Reservados © ITAM, 2005. Río Hondo No. 1, Col. Progreso Tizapán, México, D.F.
Compromiso Organizacional en México: ¿Cómo hacer que la gente se ponga la camiseta? Dirección Estratégica, 2, 2123
  • L M Arciniega
  • R Díazguerrero
  • L B Szalay
Arciniega, L.M. (2002). Compromiso Organizacional en México: ¿Cómo hacer que la gente se ponga la camiseta? Dirección Estratégica, 2, 2123. DíazGuerrero, R. and Szalay, L.B. (1993). El mundo subjetivo de mexicanos y norteamericanos. México: Trillas, pp. 151163.