ArticlePDF Available

Growing Degree Days

Authors:
  • Transpower New Zealand

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
12 NZ TURF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL Summer 2014
TIMING
Temperature is the driving
force for all biological
activity. Consequently, the
growth, development and
reproduction of many organisms are
predictable based on temperature.
A growing degree day (GDD) is a
measure of heat above a threshold for
that day. Growing degree accumulation
reflects the number of GDDs or heat
units above a base temperature for
consecutive 24-hour days.
An important aspect of GDD is that no units
(e.g. grams, litres or hectares) are associated
with the value. Instead, the accumulated GDD
values can be correlated with an event in an
organism’s life. For example, seeded couch
(Cynodon spp.) may require approximately
, GDD at a base temperature of °C to
fully establish (>% ground cover).
EARLY HISTORY OF
TURFGRASS GDDS
The first use of GDD in agriculture was to
predict the maturity in corn. The use of GDD
in turfgrass was first proposed in a paper to
predict Poa annua seedhead emergence and
development. Then a version of this model
was used to time applications of plant growth
regulator for seed head suppression.
Subsequently, GDD models were proposed
to predict growth stages of turfgrasses and
how plant growth regulator applications
could be timed. GDD could also be used to
determine when and for how long a turfgrass
species was under high temperature stress,.
Recently, there has been renewed interest in
using GDDs to time plant growth regulator
applications on a seasonal basis (see Table ).
CALCULATING GDDS
There are  ways to calculate them:
The most common is the average method
where the minimum and maximum
temperatures for a day are added together
then divided by . The base temperature,
which varies according to the plant, is
subtracted from the average. If the result
is greater than , it is added to the total
accumulating since the start date. If the
GDD is less than , it is treated as .
The base temperature can range from
-°C depending on the GDD model and
the plant being grown. Some commonly
used base temperatures would be °C
and °C.
The modified average method is used
if the minimum temperature is below
the base temperature. Then the average
method simply uses the base as the
minimum temperature in the calculation.
This method has an advantage over the
average method when temperatures
fluctuate above and below the base
temperature, as often occurs during
early spring. In such circumstances, the
average method would underestimate
the number of GDDs (as some
biological activity still does occur while
the temperature is above the base
temperature). For example, if the daily
maximum temperature was °C, the
minimum was °C and the base was °C,
the GDD would be  using the average
method. Under the modified average
method, the GDD would be .
The modified average method is more
likely in spring to ensure the correct
timing of growth regulator applications
to reduce the production of seed heads in
Poa annua.
The modified sine curve method is the
most accurate means of calculating
GDD. It is based on the assumption that
daily temperature patterns are similar to
a sine curve. The area under the curve
determines the GDD. The calculation
is considerably more complex than the
previous two methods and requires a
computer programme.
This method allows for an upper
temperature limit to be set, by which GDD
are calculated to the threshold and not
above. The upper threshold concept can
be used to calculate stress degree-days
which may help define and predict the
summer stress period,.
GDD START DATE
With all GDD models, a set start date is
Working out the optimum time to plant or treat turf can be the dierence between
success and failure. Most importantly, it saves time and money.
GROWING DEGREE DAYS
and Megan Cushnahan
Business development manager
NZSTI, Palmerston North
by Karl Danneberger, PhD
professor - dept of Horticulture
& crop science
The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Table 1. Plant growth regulators that can be based on accumulated
growing degree days.
Common Name Trade Name Mode of Action Absorption
Trinexapac-ethyl Primo EC, Moddus Late gibberellic acid (GA) inhibitor Foliar
Paclobutrazol GTi Shortstop, Payback Early GA inhibitor Root
Ethephon Ethrel, Ethin Ethylene Foliar
NZ TURF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL Summer 2014 13
TIMING
Better timing of interventions against pests like the Argentine stem weevil will aid success.
given (sometimes referred to as biofix). New
Zealand’s common start date is st July, but
this can vary. Early GDD models predicting
Poa annua or Kentucky bluegrass seedhead
emergence in the Northern Hemisphere
had a start date of st April and st March,
respectively. In New Zealand, these would
correspond to start dates of st October and
st September.
Recently, applications of the growth
regulator trinexapac-ethyl have been
recommended based on work at the
University of Wisconsin. They have suggested
applications being timed around  GDD
(base temperature °C), with repeated
applications being made at  GDD
increments.
When creating or using a GDD model,
always check the calculation method, the
temperature units (Celsius or Fahrenheit),
the base temperature and the start date used.
Note that the base temperature varies with
dierent research so you need to ensure you
are using the correct one when doing your
calculations.
GDD USE IN NEW ZEALAND
Growing degree days are widely used by the
horticultural and agricultural sectors to make
management decisions, such as the likely
maturity and harvest dates for a crop. Turf
managers in New Zealand are also starting
to use GDD to schedule the application of
Reference
1. Gilmore, E.C. and J.S. Rodgers. 1958. Heat
units as a method of measuring maturity in
corn. Agronomy Journal 50:611-615.
2. Danneberger, T.K. and J.M. Vargas, Jr. 1984.
Annual bluegrass seedhead emergence as
predicted by degree-day accumulation.
3. Danneberger, T.K., B.E. Branham, and J.M.
Vargas, Jr. 1987. Mefluidide applications for
annual bluegrass seedhead suppression based
on degree-day accumulation.
4. Branham, B.E. and T.K. Danneberger. 1989.
Growth suppression of ‘Kenblue’ Kentucky
bluegrass using plant growth regulators and
degree-day application timing. Agronomy
Journal 81:749-752.
5. Danneberger, T.K., and A.J. Turgeon. 1985.
Climatic adaptability of three cool season
grasses in northeastern United States based on
growing degree-days. Proceeding of the Fifth
International Turfgrass Research Conference
5: 801-806.
6. Danneberger, T.K. and J.R. Street. 1985.
Climatic adaptability of annual bluegrass in
Ohio using growing degree-days. Ohio Journal
of Science 85(3): 108-111.
7. Kreuser, W.C. and D.J. Soldat. 2011. A growing
degree day model to schedule trinexapac-
ethyl applications on Agrostis stolonifera golf
putting greens. Crop Science 51:2228-2236.
8. Barker, G.M., and Addison, P.J. 1990. Sampling
Argentine stem weevil, Listonotus bonariensis
(Kuschel), populations in pasture; the egg
stage. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural
Research 33: 649-659.
9. Ferguson, C. M., Evans, A. A., & Barratt, B. I. P.
(1996). Phenology of Listronotus bonariensis
(Kuschel)(Coleoptera: Curculinonidae) in
Otago. In Proceedings of the New Zealand
Plant Protection Conference (pp. 270–274).
New Zealand Plant Protection Society Inc.
Retrieved from http://www.nzpps.org/
journal/49/nzpp_492700.pdf
insecticides for the management of Argentine
stem weevil (eggs require approx.  GDD
above °C, to complete development) and
plant growth regulators for the prevention of
seedhead in Poa annua.
The most commonly used method of
calculation is the average method. Calculations
are relatively straightforward (although you
may want to use an Excel spreadsheet so that
a zero value is automatically returned when
calculations require).
To calculate GDD using the average
method, first choose a base temperature
to suit the turf grass being grown. This is
typically °C for cool season grasses and °C
for warm season grasses. Then obtain the
maximum and minimum daily temperatures
for the previous  hours. This data should be
easy to obtain if you have your own weather
station. Alternatively, NIWA runs CliFlo,
the national climate database. It is free to
subscribe to and allows you to download
temperature data.
To calculate the GDD for a particular day
at base temperature of °C, use the following
formula:
Using the formula above, the GDD for st
July at a base temperature of °C (see Table )
is as follows:
Table 2. Growing Degree Days – at a base temperature of 4°C and 10°C,
plus accumulated GDD values, for the first week of July 2014 using
the average method. Data provided by the climate station located at
AgResearch, Palmerston North.
Date Max temp.
(°C)
Min temp.
(°C) GDD4Accum
GDD4GDD10 Accum
GDD10
1/07/2014 12.4 86.2 6.2 0.2 0.2
2/07/2014 14.6 7.4 7. 0 13.2 1.0 1.2
3/07/2014 11.1 1.2 2.2 15.4 0.0 1.2
4/07/2014 11.5 1.4 2.5 17. 8 0.0 1.2
5/07/2014 13 2.2 3.6 21.4 0.0 1.2
6/07/2014 14.9 4.5 5 .7 27. 1 0.0 1.2
7/07/2014 13.2 2.7 4.0 31.1 0.0 1.2
GOOD TIMING WORKS
GDDs are a useful tool for the Turf Manager
taking aspects of local weather into account
to predict the development of plants or
insects. Improving the accuracy of timing
for interventions (e.g. preventing seedhead
development or applying chemical and
biological controls) will help improve the
ecacy while minimising product wastage.
As more turf-related data on GDD becomes
available, its use in our industry is likely to
become more popular.
This article is based on a speech by Prof Karl
Danneberger given at the 2014 NZ Fine Turf
Seminar. Edited and added to with permission.
Source: Climate data sourced from the CliFlo database (http://cliflo.niwa.co.nz)
GDD = (. + ) –  = .
GDD = (Max.temp. + Min.temp.) – 
Chapter
Plant phenology observations taken over a long history for various purposes share a common interest in evaluating seasonal influences of weather on different species. Because comprehensive review of literature has been cited by Caprio (1966) and Caprio et al. (1970), no such effort will be made here.
Article
Full-text available
Sampling systems for the egg stage of the Argentine stem weevil, Listronotus bonariensis (Kuschel), are briefly reviewed. Sampling techniques developed and extensively tested by the authors are described. Taylor's power law analysis was performed on sample mean-variance relationships for eggs per tiller and tillers per soil core. These were used to develop numerical sampling equations. A sampling plan is described for sampling populations of eggs to attain specific levels of precision at different population densities.
Article
Annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) is a major turfgrass species in Ohio. Its reported poor heat tolerance makes it a difficult turfgrass species to maintain in areas where periods of high temperatures exist. The purpose of this study was to determine areas in Ohio based on growing degree-days where annual bluegrass is adapted. Thirtyyear averages of minimum and maximum daily temperatures from 15 locations were used. A BASIC computer program was written to calculate and accumulate growing degree-days (GDD) and temperature stress degree-days (TSDD) using a sine curve as an approximation of the diurnal temperature curve. Based on TSDDs, annual bluegrass was best adapted to northern Ohio and least adapted to southern Ohio. In this study, TSDDs were useful in determining regions of annual bluegrass adaptation. Scientists involved in determining climatic regions of plant adaptation may want to consider using TSDDs as a method for quantifying temperature effects.
Article
Trinexapac-ethyl (TE) is a widely used growth regulator in the turfgrass industry. Poor summer efficacy has been related to more rapid metabolism in the plant. The purpose of this study was to determine if a growing degree day (GDD) model could be used to identify the optimum TE reapplication interval for putting greens. This objective was accomplished through model development and validation. Model development was conducted on a creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolon-ifera L.) golf putting green in Madison, WI, during 2008. The treatments consisted of five TE reapplication intervals (100, 200, 400, 800 GDD, and 4 wk) and a control. Growing degree days were calculated in degrees C with a base temperature of 0°C. Trinexapac-ethyl was applied at the rate of 0.05 kg a.i. ha -1. Clippings were collected daily. The 100- and 200-GDD reapplication intervals provided consistent 20 and 12% yield suppression, respectively. Other reapplication intervals had alternating periods of yield reduction followed by yield enhancement. Model validation occurred on a different creeping bentgrass green in 2009 and 2010. The experiment was a 3 × 2 factorial CRD with three TE rates (0.00, 0.05, and 0.10 kg a.i. ha -1) and two reapplication frequencies (200 GDD and 4 wk). The 200-GDD interval consistently suppressed clipping yield. Application rate had no effect on the duration of suppression. Reapplying TE every 200 GDD provides more consistent growth regulation than a calendar-based application schedule.
Article
Plant growth regulator (PGR) applications for seedhead and vegetative growth suppression have given inconsistent results from year to year when application timing is based on calendar days. Application timing based on growing degree days (GDD) should provide uniform and consistent results over time. These field studies were conducted to determine the window of application, based on GDD, for seedhead and vegetative growth suppression of Kentucky bluegrass. Mefluidide (N‐|2,4‐dimethyl‐5‐[[(trifluoromethyl)‐sulfonyl] amino] phenyl] acetamide) at 0.28 kg ha ⁻¹ and amidochlor (N‐[(acetylamino) methyl]‐2‐chloro‐N‐(2,6‐diethylphenyl) acetamide) at 2.8 kg ha ⁻¹ were applied to a uniform stand of Kentucky bluegrass [ Poa pratensis (L.) ‘Kenblue’] at 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 GDD. Trials were conducted at East Lansing, MI in 1985 and 1986, and Columbus, OH in 1986. Soil type at East Lansing was an Owosso‐Marlette sandy loam complex (fine‐loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Glossoboric Hapludalf). Soil at Columbus was a Brookston silty‐clay loam (fine‐loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Agriaquoll). Application of PGR between 25 and 125 GDD provided excellent (>86%) seedhead control. Mefluidide and amidochlor applications at 150 GDD gave 31 and 24% seedhead control, respectively, indicating that seedhead control was lost with this application timing. Clipping weights at East Lansing varied between years with only the 150 GDD application in 1985 and the 75 GDD application in 1986 differing significantly from the other application timings. However, the 75 GDD treatment in 1986 had reduced PGR activity because of rainfall 5 h after application. Application timing of PGR appeared to have no significant effect on the degree of vegetative growth suppression. However, GDD timed PGR applications are a valid technique for seedhead control in Kentucky bluegrass.
Article
Mefluidide [N-(2,4-dimethyl-5-{[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonylamino}phenyl) acetamide] is an effective growth regulator for annual bluegrass [Poa annua var. reptans (Hauskins) Timm.] seedhead suppression. The effectiveness of mefluidide is dependent on the rate and timing of application. The objective of this field study was to determine the lowest effective rate and the proper time for mefluidide application based on growing degree-days (GDD). Soil types were a fine, mixed, mesic Aeric Ochraqualf and fine-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Glossoboric Hapludalfs for Columbus, OH, and East Lansing, MI, respectively. The rates evaluated were 0.140, 0.070, and 0.035 kg ha⁻¹ of mefluidide. The applications were made at 15, 25, 30, and 45 GDD. Degree-days were accumulated using a sine curve as an approximation of the diurnal temperature curve. The base temperature used was 13°C. Mefluidide applied between 15 and 30 GDD at 0.140 kg ha⁻¹ gave excellent seedhead suppression. Mefluidide applied between 15 and 30 GDD at 0.070 kg ha⁻¹ gave moderate seedhead suppression. Applications of mefluidide at 45 GDD or at the 0.035 kg ha⁻¹ rate were unacceptable. Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left. Copyright © . .
Article
Seedhead production of annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) during the spring reduces annual bluegrass root production and disrupts the aesthetic and playing qualities of the turf. A method of predicting when annual bluegrass seedheads visually emerge through maximum production would be a benefit to turf managers in that management practices such as vertical mowing and core cultivation could be suitably adjusted. A model to predict the number of seedheads from visual emergence through maximum production for a perennial annual bluegrass turf was developed from three field locations in Michigan. The proposed model is seedhead no. = −6249.4 + 41.099 (DD) − 0.08573 DD² + 0.0000575 DD³ where DD = degree-day accumulation above 286 K beginning April (R² = 0.65). Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left. Copyright © . .
Article
Synopsis Synopsis Ten hybrids and 10 inbreds were planted on 5 different dates in 1956 and their maturities, based on silking dates, were calculated in heat units by 15 different methods. The, present method of calculating degree days, daily mean minus 50° F., was improved by correcting for temperatures below the minimum for growth, 50° F., and above the optimum for growth, 86° F. The number of heat units required for silking, designated as effective degrees, remained relatively constant for crops with different planting dates, while calendar days varied widely. Please view the pdf by using the Full Text (PDF) link under 'View' to the left. Copyright © . .
Climatic adaptability of three cool season grasses in northeastern United States based on growing degree-days
  • T K Danneberger
  • A J Turgeon
Danneberger, T.K., and A.J. Turgeon. 1985. Climatic adaptability of three cool season grasses in northeastern United States based on growing degree-days. Proceeding of the Fifth International Turfgrass Research Conference 5: 801-806.