ArticlePDF Available

Fresh-water pearl mussel Margaritana margaritifera (Unionidea, Margaritanidae) in rivers of the reserved area "Gladyshevskii" (Leningrad oblast)

Authors:
  • Saint Petersburg State University & University of Vienna

Abstract

The observation of the wildlife sanctuary "Gladyshevskii" (Karelian Isthmus, Leningrad oblast) revealed the presence of the fresh-water pearl mussel Margaritana mar gar it if era included into the Red Data Book of the Russian Federation in its rivers. The mollusk population is very small, and the rate of its reproduction is very low. Old-aged mollusks mainly inhabit the rivers investigated, they remained from the time of the existence of native salmon population. One of the efficient measures to restore Margaritana margaritifera is release of salmon young fishes during the spawning period of salmon in spring and/or late summer or immediately before it.
áééãéÉàóÖëäàâ ÜìêçÄã, 2008, ÚÓÏ 87, 5, Ò. 1–2
1
ÅÓθ¯‡fl ˜‡ÒÚ¸ ̇ıÓ‰ÓÍ ÔÂÒÌÓ‚Ó‰ÌÓÈ ÊÂÏ-
˜ÛÊÌˈ˚,
Margaritana margaritifera
(L.), ̇ ÚÂË-
ÚÓËË êÓÒÒËË, ÛÔÓÏflÌÛÚ˚ı ‚ ̇ۘÌÓÈ ÎËÚÂ‡ÚÛÂ,
·˚ÎË Ò‰Â·Ì˚ ‚ ä‡ÂÎËË Ë Ì‡ äÓθÒÍÓÏ Ô-‚Â. í‡Ï
Ê ·˚ÎË Ôӂ‰ÂÌ˚ ÌÂÍÓÚÓ˚ ÒÔˆˇθÌ˚ ËÒ-
ÒΉӂ‡ÌËfl ·ËÓÎÓ„ËË ˝ÚÓ„Ó ÏÓÎβÒ͇ (Ç·ÒÚÓ‚,
1934; ᲄ‡ÌÓ‚, 2005). 낉ÂÌËfl Ó ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈÂ
ãÂÌËÌ„‡‰ÒÍÓÈ Ó·Î. Ò‚Ó‰flÚÒfl Î˯¸ Í Â ÛÔÓÏË̇-
Ì˲ ‚ ˜ËÒΠÓı‡ÌflÂÏ˚ı ‚ˉӂ (ÅÓ„‡ÚÓ‚ Ë ‰.,
2004). Ç ÚÓ Ê ‚ÂÏfl, ËÁ‚ÂÒÚÌÓ, ˜ÚÓ Ì‡ ÚÂËÚÓËË
ãÂÌËÌ„‡‰ÒÍÓÈ Ó·Î. ËÁ‰‡‚̇ ÒÛ˘ÂÒÚ‚Ó‚‡Î ÔÓÏ˚-
ÒÂÎ ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ. çÂÒÍÓθÍÓ ‰ÂÒflÚËÎÂÚËÈ Ì‡Á‡‰ ÓÌ
҉·ÎÒfl χÎÓÂÌÚ‡·ÂθÌ˚Ï ËÁ-Á‡ ÒÌËÊÂÌËfl ÒÔÓÒ‡
̇ ÔÂ·ÏÛÚ Ë ˜ÌÓÈ ÊÂϘۄ, ‡ Ú‡ÍÊ ËÁ-Á‡ ÂÁ-
ÍÓ„Ó ÒÌËÊÂÌËfl ˜ËÒÎÂÌÌÓÒÚË ÏÓÎβÒÍÓ‚ ‚ ÂÁÛθ-
Ú‡Ú Á‡„flÁÌÂÌËfl ÂÍ Ë Á̇˜ËÚÂθÌÓ„Ó ÒÓÍ‡˘Â-
ÌËfl ˜ËÒÎÂÌÌÓÒÚË ÎÓÒÓÒ‚˚ı ˚·. ÜËÁÌÂÌÌ˚È
ˆËÍÎ ÔÂÒÌÓ‚Ó‰ÌÓÈ ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ˚ ÚÂÒÌÓ Ò‚flÁ‡Ì Ò
‡Ú·ÌÚ˘ÂÒÍËÏ ÎÓÒÓÒÂÏ (
Salmo salar
) Ë ÍÛÏÊÂÈ
(
S.
trutta
) –  ΢ËÌÍË Ô‡‡ÁËÚËÛ˛Ú Ì‡ ʇ·‡ı Ë
Ô·‚ÌË͇ı ˝ÚËı ˚·, Ë ÔÓ˝ÚÓÏÛ ÒÛ˘ÂÒÚ‚Ó‚‡ÌËÂ
ÔÓÔÛÎflˆËË ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ˚ ‚ÓÁÏÓÊÌÓ ÚÓθÍÓ ‚ ÚÓÏ
ÒÎÛ˜‡Â, ÂÒÎË ‚ ÂÍ ÂÒÚ¸ ÔÓÔÛÎflˆËfl ÎÓÒÓÒ‚˚ı.
Ç
Ò‚Ó˛ Ó˜Â‰¸, ̇΢ˠÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ ÍÓÒ‚ÂÌÌ˚Ï
Ó·‡ÁÓÏ ÒÔÓÒÓ·ÒÚ‚ÛÂÚ ÒÓÁ‰‡Ì˲ ·Î‡„ÓÔËflÚÌ˚ı
ÛÒÎÓ‚ËÈ ‰Îfl ‡ÁÏÌÓÊÂÌËfl ÎÓÒÓÒfl, ÔÓÒÍÓθÍÛ ˝ÚË
ÏÓÎβÒÍË, fl‚ÎflflÒ¸ ÙËθÚ‡ÚÓ‡ÏË, Ó˜Ë˘‡˛Ú
·Óθ¯Ó ÍÓ΢ÂÒÚ‚Ó ‚Ó‰˚, Ô˘ÂÏ Ì‡ ÚÂı Û˜‡ÒÚ-
͇ı ÂÍ, „‰Â ÔÓËÒıÓ‰ËÚ ÌÂÂÒÚ ÎÓÒÓÒ‚˚ı.
ë˜ËÚ‡ÂÚÒfl, ˜ÚÓ Ó‰ÌÓ ËÁ ÏÂÒÚ, „‰Â ÒÓı‡ÌË·Ҹ
ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ‡, ÂÍË Á‡Í‡ÁÌË͇ “É·‰˚¯Â‚ÒÍËÈ”
(ÇÂÎË͇fl, êÓ˘ËÌ͇, óÂ̇fl, É·‰˚¯Â‚͇), ÍÓÚÓ-
˚È ‡ÒÔÓÎÓÊÂÌ Ì‡ ä‡ÂθÒÍÓÏ ÔÂ¯ÂÈÍ ãÂ-
ÌËÌ„‡‰ÒÍÓÈ Ó·Î. ̇ ‡ÒÒÚÓflÌËË ÓÍÓÎÓ 80 ÍÏ ÓÚ
ë.-èÂÚÂ·Û„‡. çÂÓ·ıÓ‰ËÏÓÒÚ¸ Óı‡Ì˚ ÊÂϘÛÊ-
Ìˈ Ë ÔÓÒÎÛÊË· Ó‰ÌÓÈ ËÁ „·‚Ì˚ı Ô˘ËÌ ÒÓÁ‰‡-
ÌËfl ˝ÚÓ„Ó Á‡Í‡ÁÌË͇ ‚ 1996 „. é‰Ì‡ÍÓ Ò‚Â‰ÂÌËÈ Ó
ÒÓÒÚÓflÌËË ÏÂÒÚÌÓÈ ÔÓÔÛÎflˆËË ˝ÚËı ÏÓÎβÒÍÓ‚ ÌÂ
·˚ÎÓ. Ç Ú˜ÂÌË ÔÓÒÎÂ‰Û˛˘Ëı 10 ÎÂÚ ÒÓÓÚ‚ÂÚ-
ÒÚ‚Û˛˘Ë ËÒÒΉӂ‡ÌËfl Ú‡ÍÊ Ì ÔÓ‚Ó‰ËÎËÒ¸.
óÚÓ Í‡Ò‡ÂÚÒfl ÎÓÒÓÒ‚˚ı ˚·, ÚÓ ‚ Â͇ı Á‡Í‡ÁÌË-
͇ ‡Ú·ÌÚ˘ÂÒÍËÈ ÎÓÒÓÒ¸ ·˚Î, ÔÓ ‚ÒÂÈ ‚ˉËÏÓÒÚË,
ÔÓÎÌÓÒÚ¸˛ ËÒÚ·ÎÂÌ ÓÍÓÎÓ 40 ÎÂÚ Ì‡Á‡‰ (ï‡ÎÚÛ-
ËÌ, 1970), ‡ ÍÛÏʇ ÒÓı‡ÌË·Ҹ ‚ Ì·Óθ¯ÓÏ ÍÓ-
΢ÂÒÚ‚Â. Ç ÍÓ̈ 1970-ı Ë Ì‡˜‡Î 1980-ı „„. ̇
.
óÂ̇fl ÔÓ‚Ó‰ËÎËÒ¸ ‡·ÓÚ˚ ÔÓ ‚ÓÒÒÚ‡ÌÓ‚ÎÂÌ˲
ÔÓÔÛÎflˆËË ÎÓÒÓÒfl (ä‡Á‡ÍÓ‚, èÂÚÂÌÍÓ, 1987), ÌÓ
ÓÌË Ì ۂÂ̘‡ÎËÒ¸ ÛÒÔÂıÓÏ – ‰ÓÒÚÓ‚ÂÌ˚ı ҂‰Â-
ÌËÈ Ó ÌÂÂÒÚ ÎÓÒÓÒfl ‚ Â͇ı Á‡Í‡ÁÌË͇ Ì ·˚ÎÓ.
ë 2000 „. Ô‰ÔËÌËχ˛ÚÒfl ÌÓ‚˚ ÔÓÔ˚ÚÍË (̇
‰‚‡ ÔÓÓÊËÒÚ˚ı Û˜‡ÒÚ͇ . É·‰˚¯Â‚͇ ‚˚ÔÛÒ͇-
ÂÚÒfl ËÒÍÛÒÒÚ‚ÂÌÌÓ ‚˚‡˘ÂÌ̇fl ÏÓÎÓ‰¸), Ë ÓÌË ‰‡-
ÎË ÌÂÍÓÚÓ˚ ӷ̇‰ÂÊË‚‡˛˘Ë ÂÁÛθڇÚ˚. àÁ-
‚ÂÒÚÌÓ, ˜ÚÓ ‚˚ÔÛÒ͇Âχfl ÏÓÎÓ‰¸ ÔËÊË‚‡Î‡Ò¸, ‡ ‚
2003 „. ‚ . óÂ̇fl ·˚Î ÔÓÈÏ‡Ì 1 ˝ÍÁ. ‚ÁÓÒÎÓ„Ó
ÎÓÒÓÒfl (èÓÔÓ‚, 2003). ä ÒÓʇÎÂÌ˲, ÔË Ôӂ‰Â-
ÌËË ‡·ÓÚ ÔÓ ‚ÓÒÒÚ‡ÌÓ‚ÎÂÌ˲ ÎÓÒÓÒfl Ì ۘËÚ˚‚‡-
ÎËÒ¸ Ó·ÒÚÓflÚÂθÒÚ‚‡, ÒÔÓÒÓ·ÒÚ‚Û˛˘Ë ÒÓı‡ÌÂ-
Ì˲ Ë ‚ÓÒÒÚ‡ÌÓ‚ÎÂÌ˲ ÔÓÔÛÎflˆËË ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ˚.
Ç 2006 „. ̇ÏË ·˚ÎÓ Ó·ÒΉӂ‡ÌÓ Ò‚˚¯Â 1000 Ï
2
‰Ì‡ ÔÓÓÊËÒÚ˚ı Û˜‡ÒÚÍÓ‚ ÂÍ Á‡Í‡ÁÌË͇. Ç Â͇ı
êÓ˘ËÌ͇ Ë É·‰˚¯Â‚͇ ·˚ÎÓ Ó·Ì‡ÛÊÂÌÓ 29 ÊË-
‚˚ı Ë 5 ÏÂÚ‚˚ı ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ. ç‡ ÚÂı ÔÓÓ„‡ı
.
êÓ˘ËÌÍË ‚ÒÂ„Ó ·˚ÎÓ Ì‡È‰ÂÌÓ 23 ÊË‚˚ Ë
2
ÏÂÚ‚˚ ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ˚, ‡ÁÏÂ˚ ‡ÍÓ‚ËÌ ÍÓÚÓ-
˚ı ÒÓÒÚ‡‚ËÎË: ‰ÎË̇ 7.4–11.1 ÒÏ, ‚˚ÒÓÚ‡ 4.0–
5.4
ÒÏ, ¯ËË̇ (ÚÓ΢Ë̇) 2.4–3.6 ÒÏ. ëÛ‰fl ÔÓ ‰ÎË-
Ì ‡ÍÓ‚ËÌ˚, ‚ÓÁ‡ÒÚ ÏÓÎβÒÍÓ‚ ÒÓÒÚ‡‚ÎflÎ ÓÍÓÎÓ
50–60 ÎÂÚ (ᇈÂÔËÌ, îË·ÚÓ‚‡, 1968; äÓ‡„Ó, 1981).
Ç . É·‰˚¯Â‚͇ ‚ÒÂ„Ó ·˚ÎÓ Ì‡È‰ÂÌÓ 6 ÊË‚˚ı
Ë 3 ÏÂÚ‚˚ ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ˚. íË ÊË‚˚ ÊÂϘÛÊ-
Ìˈ˚ ·˚ÎË ÓÚÌÓÒËÚÂθÌÓ ÏÓÎÓ‰˚ÏË. ê‡ÁÏÂ˚ Ëı
‡ÍÓ‚ËÌ ÒÓÒÚ‡‚ËÎË: ‰ÎË̇ 3.6–5.4 ÒÏ, ‚˚ÒÓÚ‡ 2.2–
3.1 ÒÏ, ¯ËË̇ (ÚÓ΢Ë̇) 1.6–1.9 ÒÏ. ëÛ‰fl ÔÓ ˜ËÒ-
ÎÛ „Ó‰Ó‚˚ı ÁÓÌ Ì‡‡ÒÚ‡ÌËfl ‡ÍÓ‚ËÌ˚, ÏÓÎÓ‰˚Â
ÏÓÎβÒÍË ËÏÂÎË ‚ÓÁ‡ÒÚ ÔËÏÂÌÓ ‚ 5.5 (‰‚ ·Ó-
ΠÍÛÔÌ˚ı ÓÒÓ·Ë) Ë 4.5 (҇χfl ÏÂÎ͇fl ÓÒÓ·¸)
ÎÂÚ. ÇÒ ÓÌË ·˚ÎË Ì‡È‰ÂÌ˚ ̇ ÔÓÓ„Â ÂÍË, „‰Â ‚
2000 „. ·˚ÎÓ ‚˚ÔÛ˘ÂÌÓ ·Óθ¯Ó ÍÓ΢ÂÒÚ‚Ó ÏÓ-
ÎÓ‰Ë ÎÓÒÓÒfl. ç‡ ÚÓÏ Ê ÔÓӄ ̇ÏË ·˚ÎÓ Ó·Ì‡-
äêÄíäàÖ ëééÅôÖçàü
èêÖëçéÇéÑçÄü ÜÖåóìÜçàñÄ (
MARGARITANA MARGARITIFERA
,
UNIONIDEA, MARGARITINIDAE) Ç êÖäÄï áÄäÄáçàäÄ
“ÉãÄÑõòÖÇëäàâ” (ãÖçàçÉêÄÑëäÄü éÅãÄëíú)
© 2008 „. Ä. ç. éÒÚÓ‚ÒÍËÈ
1
, à. û. èÓÔÓ‚
2
1
ë.-èÂÚÂ·Û„ÒÍËÈ „ÓÒÛ‰‡ÒÚ‚ÂÌÌ˚È ÛÌË‚ÂÒËÚÂÚ, ë.-èÂÚÂ·Û„ 199034, êÓÒÒËfl
e-mail: oan_univer@yahoo.com
2
ë.-èÂÚÂ·Û„ÒÍËÈ „ÓÒÛ‰‡ÒÚ‚ÂÌÌ˚È ÛÌË‚ÂÒËÚÂÚ, ÅËÓÎӄ˘ÂÒÍËÈ Ì‡Û˜ÌÓ-ËÒÒΉӂ‡ÚÂθÒÍËÈ ËÌÒÚËÚÛÚ,
ë.-èÂÚÂ·Û„, ëÚ‡˚È èÂÚÂ„ÓÙ 198504, êÓÒÒËfl
e-mail: igorioshapopov@mail.ru
èÓÒÚÛÔË· ‚ ‰‡ÍˆË˛ 01.02.2007 „.
ìÑä 595
2
áééãéÉàóÖëäàâ ÜìêçÄãÚÓÏ 87‹ 52008
éÒÚÓ‚ÒÍËÈ, èÓÔÓ‚
ÛÊÂÌÓ „ÌÂÁ‰Ó ÎÓÒÓÒfl Ò Ï‡Î¸Í‡ÏË, ÍÓÚÓ˚Â, Ó˜Â-
‚ˉÌÓ, ‚˚¯ÎË ËÁ ÌÂ„Ó ÌÂÁ‡‰ÓÎ„Ó ‰Ó ̇˜‡Î‡ ̇¯Â„Ó
ËÒÒΉӂ‡ÌËfl (Ë˛Ì¸ 2006 „.).
èÎÓÚÌÓÒÚ¸ ÔÓÒÂÎÂÌËfl ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ ̇ Ó‰ÌÓÏ ËÁ
Û˜‡ÒÚÍÓ‚ ÚÂÚ¸Â„Ó (ÌËÊÌ„Ó) ÔÓÓ„‡ . êÓ˘ËÌÍË
ÒÓÒÚ‡‚Ë· 6 ÓÒÓ·ÂÈ Ì‡ 25 Ï
2
, ‡ ̇ Ó‰ÌÓÈ ËÁ ÔÓÚÓÍ
Ò‰ÌÂ„Ó ÔÓÓ„‡ – 10 ÓÒÓ·ÂÈ Ì‡ 90 Ï
2
. íÂÏ Ì ÏÂ-
ÌÂÂ, ‚Ó ‚ÒÂı ÓÒڇθÌ˚ı ÒÎÛ˜‡flı Ó̇ ·˚· Á̇˜Ë-
ÚÂθÌÓ ÌËÊÂ, ÒÓÒÚ‡‚Îflfl 1 ÓÒÓ·¸ ̇ ÌÂÒÍÓθÍÓ ÒÓ-
ÚÂÌ Í‚‡‰‡ÚÌ˚ı ÏÂÚÓ‚.
å˚ ̇ıÓ‰ËÎË ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ Í‡Í ‚ ‚ÂıÌÂÈ, Ú‡Í Ë
Ò‰ÌÂÈ Ë ÌËÊÌÂÈ ˜‡ÒÚflı ÔÓÓ„Ó‚, ̇ Û˜‡ÒÚ͇ı
‰Ì‡ Ò ÒËθÌ˚Ï (ÓÍÓÎÓ 0.8 Ï/Ò) Ë ÛÏÂÂÌÌ˚Ï (ÓÍÓÎÓ
0.3 Ï/Ò) Ú˜ÂÌËÂÏ Ì‡ „ÎÛ·Ë̇ı ÓÚ 20 ÒÏ ‰Ó 1.0 Ï.
ÜÂϘÛÊÌˈ˚ Ô‰ÔÓ˜ËÚ‡ÎË ÒÂÎËÚ¸Òfl ̇ ‚‡ÎÛÌÌÓ-
ÔÂÒ˜‡Ì˚ı Û˜‡ÒÚ͇ı, Ӊ̇ÍÓ ËÌÓ„‰‡ ‚ÒÚ˜‡ÎËÒ¸ ̇
Ò‚Ó·Ó‰ÌÓÏ ÓÚ Í‡ÏÌÂÈ ÔÂÒ˜‡ÌÓÏ ËÎË „‡Î˜ÌÓ-ÔÂÒ-
˜‡ÌÓÏ ‰ÌÂ, ËÁ·Â„‡fl Á‡‚‡ÎÓ‚ ËÁ Á‡ÚÓÔÎÂÌÌ˚ı ‚ÂÚÓÍ
Ë ÍÓ˚.
í‡ÍËÏ Ó·‡ÁÓÏ, Ï˚ ‚˚flÒÌËÎË, ˜ÚÓ ‚ Â͇ı Á‡-
͇ÁÌË͇ ÔÂÒÌӂӉ̇fl ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ‡ ÒÓı‡ÌË·Ҹ,
ÌÓ Â ˜ËÒÎÂÌÌÓÒÚ¸ Í‡ÈÌ Ì‚ÂÎË͇, ‡ ÚÂÏÔ˚ ‚ÓÁ-
Ó·ÌÓ‚ÎÂÌËfl ˜ÂÁ‚˚˜‡ÈÌÓ ÌËÁÍË. Ç Â͇ı ÓÒÚ‡-
ÎËÒ¸, ‚ ÓÒÌÓ‚ÌÓÏ, ÏÓÎβÒÍË-‰Ó΄ÓÊËÚÂÎË, ÒÓı‡-
ÌË‚¯ËÂÒfl Ò ÚÂı ‚ÂÏÂÌ, ÍÓ„‰‡ Á‰ÂÒ¸ ÒÛ˘ÂÒÚ‚Ó‚‡Î‡
ÂÒÚÂÒÚ‚ÂÌ̇fl ÔÓÔÛÎflˆËfl ‡Ú·ÌÚ˘ÂÒÍÓ„Ó ÎÓÒÓÒfl.
2006 „. ·˚Î ÓÒÓ·ÂÌÌÓ Á‡ÒÛ¯ÎË‚˚Ï, Ë Í ÓÒÂÌË ÂÍË
ÒËθÌÓ Ó·ÏÂÎÂÎË. ç‡ ÔÓÔÛÎflˆËË ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ ˝ÚÓ,
ÔÓ ‚ÒÂÈ ‚ˉËÏÓÒÚË, ÓÚ‡ÁËÎÓÒ¸ Ò‡Ï˚Ï Ì··„Ó-
ÔËflÚÌ˚Ï Ó·‡ÁÓÏ. Ç ÒÂÌÚfl· ̇ÏË ·˚ÎÓ Ì‡È‰Â-
ÌÓ ÌÂÒÍÓθÍÓ Ì‰‡‚ÌÓ ÔÓ„Ë·¯Ëı ‚ÁÓÒÎ˚ı ÏÓÎ-
βÒÍÓ‚, ÍÓÚÓ˚ ‚ ÂÁÛθڇÚ ӷÏÂÎÂÌËfl Ó͇Á‡-
ÎËÒ¸ ÔÓ˜ÚË Ì‡ ÒÛ¯Â. ëΉӂ‡ÚÂθÌÓ, ˜ËÒÎÂÌÌÓÒÚ¸
ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ˚ ‚ ̇ÒÚÓfl˘Â ‚ÂÏfl ÒÍÓ ÒÓÍ‡˘‡-
ÂÚÒfl, ˜ÂÏ Û‚Â΢˂‡ÂÚÒfl, Ë ÔÓÔÛÎflˆË˛ ÏÓÊÌÓ ‡Ò-
ÒχÚË‚‡Ú¸ Í‡Í Ì‡ıÓ‰fl˘Û˛Òfl ̇ „‡ÌË ËÒ˜ÂÁÌÓ‚Â-
ÌËfl. ꇷÓÚ˚ ÔÓ ‚ÓÒÒÚ‡ÌÓ‚ÎÂÌ˲ ‡Ú·ÌÚ˘ÂÒÍÓ„Ó
ÎÓÒÓÒfl, ÍÓÚÓ˚ ÔÓ‚Ó‰flÚÒfl ‚ ÔÓÒΉÌË „Ó‰˚,
ÒÔÓÒÓ·ÒÚ‚Û˛Ú ÒÓı‡ÌÂÌ˲ ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ˚, Ӊ̇ÍÓ
ÓÌË Ì‰ÓÒÚ‡ÚÓ˜ÌÓ ˝ÙÙÂÍÚË‚Ì˚. ĉÏËÌËÒÚ‡ˆËË
Á‡Í‡ÁÌË͇ ÂÍÓÏẨӂ‡ÌÓ ÔÓ‚Ó‰ËÚ¸ ‚˚ÔÛÒÍ ÏÓ-
ÎÓ‰Ë ÎÓÒÓÒ‚˚ı ̇ ‚Ò ÔÓÓ„Ë ÂÍ, „‰Â ÒÓı‡ÌË-
·Ҹ ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ‡. èÓÒÍÓθÍÛ ÓʉÂÌˠ΢ËÌÓÍ
ÔÓËÒıÓ‰ËÚ ‚Ó ‚ÚÓÓÈ ÔÓÎÓ‚ËÌ ÎÂÚ‡ Ë Ì‡˜‡ÎÂ
ÓÒÂÌË (܇‰ËÌ, 1938), ÚÓ ‚˚ÔÛÒÍË Ê·ÚÂθÌÓ ÔÓ-
‚Ó‰ËÚ¸ ‚ÂÒÌÓÈ Ë/ËÎË ÎÂÚÓÏ.
ëèàëéä ãàíÖêÄíìêõ
ÅÓ„‡ÚÓ‚ Ç.Ç., ëÚ‡Ó·Ó„‡ÚÓ‚ ü.à., äË‚Óı‡ÚÒÍËÈ Ç.Ä
.,
2004. åÓÎβÒÍË // ä‡Ò̇fl ÍÌË„‡ ÔËÓ‰˚ ë‡ÌÍÚ-
èÂÚÂ·Û„‡. ëè·.: èÓÙÂÒÒËÓ̇Î. ë. 249–256.
Ç·ÒÚÓ‚ Å.Ç
., 1934. ÅËÓÎÓ„Ëfl ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ˚ (
Margari-
tana margaritifera
L.) Ë ÔÓ·ÎÂχ ËÒÔÓθÁÓ‚‡ÌËfl ÂÂ
‡ÍÓ‚ËÌ˚ Í‡Í ÔÂ·ÏÛÚÓ‚Ó„Ó Ò˚¸fl // íÛ‰˚ ÅÓ-
Ó‰ËÌÒÍ. ·ËÓÎ. ÒÚ. í. VII. ë. 5–36.
܇‰ËÌ Ç.à
., 1938. ëÂÏ. Unionidae. åÓÎβÒÍË // î‡Û̇
ëëëê. å.–ã.: çÓ‚‡fl ÒÂËfl. ‹ 18. í. 4. Ç˚Ô. 1. ë. 1–172.
ᇈÂÔËÌ Ç.à., îË·ÚÓ‚‡ á.Ä
., 1968. ä·ÒÒ Ñ‚ÛÒÚ‚Ó-
˜‡Ú˚ (Bivalvia) // ÜËÁ̸ ÊË‚ÓÚÌ˚ı. å.: èÓÒ‚Â-
˘ÂÌËÂ. í. 2. ë. 95–155.
ᲄ‡ÌÓ‚ Ç.Ç
., 2005. è‡‡‰ÓÍÒ Ô‡‡ÁËÚ‡, ÔӉ΂‡˛-
˘Â„Ó ÊËÁ̸ ıÓÁflË̇. ä‡Í ÊÂϘÛÊÌˈ‡ ‚˚Íβ˜‡ÂÚ
ÔÓ„‡ÏÏÛ ÛÒÍÓÂÌËfl ÒÚ‡ÂÌËfl Û ÎÓÒÓÒfl // àÁ‚.
êÄç. ëÂ. ·ËÓÎ. ‹ 4. ë. 435–441.
ä‡Á‡ÍÓ‚ ê.Ç., èÂÚÂÌÍÓ ã.Ä
., 1987. éÔ˚Ú ‚ÒÂÎÂÌËfl
ÏÓÎÓ‰Ë ‡Ú·ÌÚ˘ÂÒÍÓ„Ó ÎÓÒÓÒfl ËÁ ÂÍË ç‚˚ ‚ Â-
ÍÛ óÂÌÛ˛ (îËÌÒÍËÈ Á‡ÎË‚ ŇÎÚËÈÒÍÓ„Ó ÏÓfl) //
èÓ·ÎÂÏ˚ ÚÂÓËË Ë Ô‡ÍÚËÍË ˚·ÓıÓÁflÈÒÚ‚ÂÌÌÓÈ
̇ÛÍË. ë·. ̇ۘÌ. ÚÛ‰Ó‚ ÉÓÒçàéêï. Ç˚Ô. 258.
ë.
94–102.
äÓ‡„Ó Ä.Ä
., 1981. ê˜ÌÓÈ ÊÂϘۄ. ã.: ç‰‡. 120 Ò.
èÓÔÓ‚ à.û
., 2003. ëÓ‚ÂÏÂÌÌÓ ÒÓÒÚÓflÌË ÔÓÔÛÎflˆËÈ
·‡ÎÚËÈÒÍÓ„Ó ÎÓÒÓÒfl êÓÒÒËÈÒÍÓÈ ˜‡ÒÚË îËÌÒÍÓ„Ó
Á‡ÎË‚‡ // äÓÌÙ. “ÄÍ‚‡ÚÂ‡”. ë·. χÚÂˇÎÓ‚ ëè·.
ë. 127–129.
ï‡ÎÚÛËÌ Ñ.ä
., 1970. àÒÒΉӂ‡ÌË ·ËÓÎÓ„ËË ÍÛÏÊË
(
Salmo trutta
L.) ä‡ÂθÒÍÓ„Ó ÔÂ¯ÂÈ͇ // ÇÓÔ.
ËıÚËÓÎ. í. 10. Ç˚Ô. 2 (61). ë. 319–332.
FRESH-WATER PEARL MUSSEL
MARGARITANA MARGARITIFERA
(UNIONIDEA, MARGARITINIDAE) IN RIVERS OF THE RESERVED
AREA “GLADYSHEVSKII” (LENINGRAD OBLAST)
A. N. Ostrovskii
1
, I. Yu. Popov
2
1
Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia
e-mail: oan_univer@yahoo.com
2
Biological Research Institute, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Staryi Petergof 198504, Russia
e-mail: igorioshapopov@mail.ru
The observation of the reserved area “Gladyshevskii” (Karelian Isthmus, Leningrad oblast) revealed the pres-
ence of the fresh-water pearl mussel,
Margaritana margaritifera
, included into the Red data Book of the Rus-
sian Federation in its rivers and streams. The abundance of this mollusk population is very small, and the rate
of its reproduction is very low. Old-aged mollusks mainly inhabit the rivers investigated, they remained from
the time of the existence of natural salmon. One of the efficient measures to restore
Margaritana margaritifera
is release of salmon young fishes during the spawning period of salmon (late summer-early autumn) or imme-
diately before it.
... Intensive research into the pearl mussel distribution in Russia has only just begun. This work is underway in Arkhangelsk Region (review: Bespalaya et al., 2007a), western Leningrad Region (Ostrovskii and Popov, 2008), Karelia (Makhrov et al., submitted); a review of data on pearl mussel populations in southerner regions has been prepared (Makhrov, 2009). ...
... Today, one of the principal reasons for decline among the surviving pearl mussel populations is poor condition of the populations of glochidia hosts -Atlantic salmon and brown trout (Bespalaya et al., 2007b, Zyuganov, 2008Ostrovskii and Popov, 2008;Makhrov, 2009;Makhrov et al., submitted). ...
Article
Full-text available
The review provides information about pearl harvesting (16 th –20 th cent.) and distribution of the freshwater pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera (L.) in North-West Russia; special focus is on the Kola Peninsula. In the Russian Federation at large, 157 rivers and streams are either known to have had pearl harvesting or/and reported to harbour pearl mussel (species affiliation of the mussels in 65 of them was confirmed by experts). The number of pearl mussel streams is strongly underestimated since both pearl harvesting and pearl mussel distribution have been insufficiently studied. State-of-the-art of pearl mussel populations is also poorly known, but it is safe to say there now (21 st cent.) exist at least 24 populations. Freshwater pearl mussel abundance in Russia is higher than elsewhere in the world.
... Intensive research into the pearl mussel distribution in Russia has only just begun. This work is underway in Arkhangelsk Region (review: Bespalaya et al., 2007a), western Leningrad Region (Ostrovskii and Popov, 2008), Karelia (Makhrov et al., submitted); a review of data on pearl mussel populations in southerner regions has been prepared (Makhrov, 2009). ...
... Today, one of the principal reasons for decline among the surviving pearl mussel populations is poor condition of the populations of glochidia hosts -Atlantic salmon and brown trout (Bespalaya et al., 2007b, Zyuganov, 2008Ostrovskii and Popov, 2008;Makhrov, 2009;Makhrov et al., submitted). ...
... Intensive studies of the mollusk are now underway in nearly all regions holding such populations, including Karelia's neighbors Finland (Oulasvirta 2006), and the Arkhangelsk Makhrov 2007a, 2007b), Leningrad (Ostrovskii and Popov 2008) and Murmansk (Gilyazova 2000;Pavlov, Kaliuzhin, and Veselov 2007) regions of the Russian Federation. Unfortunately, no scientific articles on freshwater pearl mussel in Karelia have been published in the twenty-first century, except for small entries in the Karelia Encyclopedia and the Red Data Book of Karelia, as well as an article on the taxonomy of pearl mussels (Sergeeva et al. 2008). ...
Article
Full-text available
Data are presented on the distribution and state of populations of a rare species, the European freshwater pearl mussel, in the rivers of Karelia. Populations of Atlantic salmon in the rivers surveyed, and pearl mussel glochidial infection in salmon juveniles were analyzed. It is demonstrated that timber floating, hydropower engineering, pearl harvesting and deforestation have resulted in extinction of the pearl mussel in several rivers. Decline in juvenile salmon abundance has negative influence on the pearl mussel recruitment. However, our data prove that Karelia, both the White Sea and the Baltic Sea catchments, still possesses viable populations of the pearl mussel.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
A survey of the European pearl mussel Margaritifera margaritifera around one of the largest Russian cities – St. Petersburg, revealed five populations in the rivers flowing to the Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea. Population in River Peypia comprises about 40 000 individuals, which makes it one of the biggest in Russia. Four other populations are represented by a few individuals, although both adult and young. We believe such populations can survive even being very small, and discuss the conditions required for that. We also compare the circumstances of the pearl mussel survival in Russia and in Western Europe.
Article
Full-text available
An internationally important population of the freshwater pearl mussel ( Margaritifera margaritifera ) was rediscovered in a small river in north‐west Russia. A survey of visible mussels in 2008/2009 indicated an estimated population of 40 000 individuals. This is the largest population currently known in the Leningrad oblast and is comparable with the entire pearl mussel population of some western European countries. The average density of visible mussels was 29.6 individuals m ⁻² in the middle part of the river. In the four largest mussel beds maximum densities of 1000+ individuals m ⁻² were recorded. Such densities are exceptional and have not been reported elsewhere in Europe during the last 100 years. Live juvenile mussels were recorded, indicating that that this population is viable, although further investigation is required to establish its status. Analysis of the population age structure, based on the measurement of empty shells, showed an age class distribution similar to those reported for other healthy Margaritifera populations. Only two live juveniles were found. However, this is likely to be due to the survey being restricted to counts of visible mussels only, and the age structure being based on the analysis of dead shells. The population's current status and possible reasons for its survival in this river are discussed. Conservation measures should include the construction of a fish ladder to make fish migration through the culvert possible, removal of a metal screen preventing fish migration from the upper reaches of the river to the lake, reduction of recreation activities, and providing the local children's camp with water treatment facilities. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.