Available via license: CC BY 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of Medical Education. 2016;7:52-55
ISSN: 2042-6372
DOI: 10.5116/ijme.56a7.5124
Differences in medical students’ academic
interest and performance across career choice
motivations
Kyong
-Jee Kim1, Jee Y. Hwang1, Bum S. Kwon2
1Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Dongguk University, Korea
2
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Dongguk University, Korea
Correspondence:
Bum Sun Kwon, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Dongguk University, Korea.
E-mail: bskwon@dumc.or.kr
Accepted: January 26, 2016
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate medical students’ career choice
motivation and its relationship with their academic interest
and performance.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a sample
(n=207) of medical students at a private medical school in
Korea, stratified by year of medical course. Data about
participant demographics, career choice motivation and
academic interest were collected using a self-report ques-
tionnaire. The item on career choice motivation enquired
about the respondents’ main reason for applying for medi-
cal school among 8 possible response options, which
comprised two components of career choice motivation:
intrinsic and extrinsic. The participants’ levels of academic
interest were measured in a Likert-type question. Partici-
pants’ academic interest and Grade Point Averages (GPAs)
were compared across the groups of different career motiva-
tions along with analyses of their admission scores for
baseline comparisons.
Results: A total of 195 students completed the
questionnaire (94%response rate). Seventy-four percent,
(n=145; the intrinsic group) of the participants chose
reasons related to intrinsic motivation, 22% (n=42; the
extrinsic group) chose reasons pertaining to extrinsic
motivation, and 4% (n = 8) chose other reasons for applying
to medical school. The intrinsic group outperformed the
extrinsic group in their GPAs, although their prior academ-
ic achievements did not differ significantly. The intrinsic
group showed significantly higher levels of academic
interest and also performed better in the admission inter-
views.
Conclusions: Our study illustrates differences in medical
students’ academic interest and performance across career
choice motivations. Further research is warranted to estab-
lish the predictive power of medical students’ career choice
motivation and academic interest on their academic per-
formance.
Keywords: Academic interest, medical students, perfor-
mance, career choice, motivations
Introduction
The learner’s motivation is a critical component of the
learning process and research indicates that it influences his
or her learning and performance.1,2 Motivation is also
known to be a predictor for students’ persistence or contin-
uation in a study and psychological well-being, such as
distress and burnout.2,3 Accordingly, research in medical
education has shown that medical students’ motivation is
associated with their academic achievement.4-6
Among several constructs on motivation is the student’s
motivation for pursuing a medical career when entering
medical school, which is referred to as career choice motiva-
tion.3 Career choice motivation is one of the attributes that
are often looked into in selecting medical students. As
healthcare students tend to bring more unique intentions
and motivations for learning than is commonly seen in
other university students,7 it can be argued that it is im-
portant to understand the impact of career choice motiva-
tion on their learning and performance. Although research
has shown that career choice motivation is related to
burnout in medical students3 and suggests a link between
their career choice motivations and approaches to learning,8
empirical evidence is lacking on the relationship between
medical students’ career choice motivation and their
academic performance.
The literature suggests career choice motivation in-
volves intrinsic and extrinsic motivations.1 Those intrinsi-
cally motivated pursue an activity for personal interest or
enjoyment, and those who are extrinsically motivated
52
© 2016 Kyong-Jee Kim et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use of
work provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0
engage in an activity for a desirable outcome – i.e., to obtain
a reward - or because of pressure from others.9 In addition,
interest is closely linked to an individual’s intrinsic motiva-
tion.9,10 Accordingly, medical students’ academic interest is
instrumental to understanding their motivation. However,
research has not determined whether medical students’
career choice motivations are associated with their academ-
ic interest. This study therefore aimed to investigate differ-
ences in medical students’ academic interest and perfor-
mance across career choice motivations.
Methods
Participants and settings
We conducted a cross-sectional study in a sample (n = 207)
of medical students at Dongguk University medical school
(DUMS), a private medical school in Korea, stratified by
year of medical course. All of the students in the basic
medical program at DUMS were invited to participate in
the study. About one-third of the students were undergrad-
uate-entry, and two-thirds were graduate-entry students.
Students of both entry-levels were in the same four-year
medical curriculum, in which undergraduate-entry students
take a two-year premedical program that precedes the
medical program.
Institutional review board (IRB) approval was not re-
quested for the present study, because it was part of the
annual survey of students that pertain to their learning
outcomes, which fell under the general exemption from our
IRB for educational outcomes data. Participation was
voluntary and consent was implied with the return of the
survey as responses were collected anonymously.
Instrument and procedures
A self-report questionnaire was administered in April, 2014.
The questionnaire consisted of 7 items on participant
demographics, one item on the respondent’s levels of
academic interest, and one item on career choice motiva-
tion. The item on career choice motivation was adapted
from the instrument, “Career Choice Motivation” by
Pagnin et al.3 In this item, respondents are asked to choose
one main reason for applying for medical school among
seven possible response options. These response options
consist of two components of motivation for applying to
medical school: intrinsic motivation with three options
(interest in human relationships, intellectual curiosity, and
altruism) and extrinsic motivation with four options
(economic concern, professional profile, illness or death
experiences, and influence of someone). The original
English version had previously been translated into Korean
by one of the authors, reviewed by experts and pilot tested
in previous years for validation.
Some response options in the item on career choice mo-
tivation were modified from the original version for adapta-
tion to the Korean context. Two response options in the
extrinsic motivation component of the original version,
“good chance of financial gain”, and “self-employed profes-
sional and social prestige”, were merged into one category
and named “social prestige and good chance of financial
gain”. A new response option, “obtained a very good score
in the college entrance exam”, was added into the extrinsic
motivation component as it was a frequently selected
answer among reasons for entering medical school in
previous surveys. An “others” option was also added to
solicit responses that were not covered by the given re-
sponse options, which gives a total of 8 response options.
The item on academic interest was adapted from the
instrument developed by Kim et al.11 This item comprises
the question, “How would you rate your level of interest in
the study of medicine?” with responses given on a five-point
Likert scale ranging from 1 = “very uninterested”, to 5 =
“very interested”.
Independent t-test was performed to compare the stu-
dent’s level of academic interest, academic performance,
and admission scores between the two groups. Additionally,
distributions of participant backgrounds (i.e., gender, entry-
level, undergraduate majors) were compared across groups
of different career choice motivations using chi-square test.
IBM-SPSS version 20 was used and the significance level
was 0.05 for the statistical analysis.
Results
Participants’ demographics and their career choice
motivations
A total of 195 students completed the questionnaire (94%
response rate) comprising of 78 (40%) female and 117
(60%) male; 76 (39%) undergraduate-entry and 119 (61%)
graduate-entry. Participant ages ranged from 19 to 37 years
(M=25.4, SD = 3.58).
For the main reason for applying to medical school, 74%
(n=145; the intrinsic group) of the participants chose those
related to intrinsic motivation, 22% (n=42; the extrinsic
group) chose those pertaining to extrinsic motivation, and
4% (n=8) chose other reasons. The most frequently selected
answer was “intellectual curiosity (n=76, 39%)”, followed by
“personal illness / illness or death of family members (n
=36, 18%)”, and “social prestige and good chance of finan-
cial gain (n=27, 14%)”.
There were no differences in the distributions of partici-
pants’ career choice motivation across gender (χ2 = 0.99, p =
0.61) or across entry-levels (χ2=15.30, p=0.23). Participant
ages did not differ between the intrinsic and extrinsic
groups (M=26.7 vs. 26.8, t =0.07, p=0.94).
Comparisons of participants’ academic interest and
performance
Table 1 compares the participants’ Grade Point Averages
(GPAs) across groups of different career choice motivations
by year of study. The intrinsic group outperformed the
extrinsic group in all years in the medical program, as
Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:52-55 53
Kim et al. Career choice motivation
measured by mean GPA. This difference was significant in
Years 2 and 3, although the effect sizes were moderate to
small (d = 0.48 and 0.12, respectively). Additionally, the two
groups differed in their levels of interest in the study of
medicine (t = 2.94, p < 0.01) with a moderate effect size
(d = 0.51).
Participants’ admission scores were compared between
the two groups to investigate differences in their baseline
performance. Admission scores were obtained for graduate-
entry students (n=119) only, because such data were not
available for undergraduate-entry students. The two groups
did not differ in their undergraduate GPAs and Korean
medical school entrance exam (Medical Education Eligibil-
ity Test: MEET) scores, but interview scores were signifi-
cantly higher in the intrinsic group (t=3.00, p < 0.01).
Table 1. Comparison of participants’ academic interest, GPAs,
and admission scores across different career choice motivations
(n = 195)
P
articipants
The intrinsic
group
(Mean± SD)
The extrinsic
group
(Mean ± SD)
t
(
p
)
Interest in the study of
medicine
4.03 ± 0.83
3.60 ± 0.84
2.94 (< 0.01)
Medical School GPAs
Year 1
3.13 ± 0.54
3.05 ± 0.51
0.56 (0.57)
Year 2
3.27 ± 0.52
3.03 ± 0.49
2.03 (0.04)
Year 3
3.51 ± 0.38
3.31 ± 0.31
1.93 (0.05)
Year 4
3.64 ± 0.30
3.46 ± 0.25
1.86 (0.65)
Admission
scores*
Undergraduate GPAs
91.56 ± 3.30
91.29 ± 2.91
0.96 (0.34)
Medical School Entr ance
Exam (MEET) Scores
167.32 ± 20.08
171.82 ± 24.02
0.51 (0.61)
Interview scores
100.76 ± 1.08
93.77 11.60
3.00 (< 0.01)
*Admission scores are for graduat e-entry students only (n = 119)
Discussion
Our study investigated the relationship between medical
students’ career choice motivation and their academic
performance. With the distributions of individual back-
grounds (i.e., gender, entry-levels, and ages) and prior
academic achievements not being different between stu-
dents with different career choice motivations, our findings
indicate that career choice motivation in medical students
may account for differences in their academic performance.
Approximately two-thirds of the students in our study
reported they were intrinsically motivated in applying for
medical school. This finding is similar to that of the study of
Brazilian students by Pagnin et al.3 Still, there were differ-
ences in the distributions of student responses across these
two studies. In our study, the most frequently selected
answer to the reason for applying to medical school was
intellectual curiosity, whereas in Pagnin’s,3 it was profes-
sional profile. These findings suggest that there are differ-
ences in medical students’ career choice motivations ac-
cording to the cultural or social contexts that they are in.
Moreover, we found differences in students’ perceived
levels of academic interest between the groups of different
career choice motivations. Motivational theories suggest
that intrinsic motivation is positively associated with
academic performance.12 Therefore, it can be interpreted
that those who are intrinsically motivated in their career
choice in medicine likely have higher intrinsic interest in
learning medicine than those who are extrinsically motivat-
ed, and that higher intrinsic interest in learning may be
linked to higher academic achievement. Still, our study did
not explore reasons for the differences in the students’ levels
of academic interest across different career choice motiva-
tions as it was beyond the scope of this study. Future
research is warranted to investigate relationships between
medical students’ career choice motivation and their
academic interest.
Our study had several limitations. First, this was a pre-
liminary study into career choice motivation using a rela-
tively small sample from one institution. Therefore, future
research with a larger sample from multiple institutions is
warranted to enhance the generalizability of this study.
Second, our study sample is relatively unique in that two
different tracks of students – i.e., undergraduates and
graduates - are in the same cohorts. Although our study
revealed no differences in baseline performance between
graduates and undergraduates, past studies suggests there
are differences between these two groups in their motiva-
tional profiles and learning outcomes.13 Therefore, readers
need to take this into account in generalizing our findings
into their own contexts. Third, although this study found a
relationship between medical students’ career choice
motivation, their academic interest and performance, it
does not reveal the extent to which career choice motivation
and academic interest account for the differences in their
academic performance. Further multivariate analysis is
recommended to establish the predictive power of the
medical students’ career choice motivation and academic
interest on their academic performance.
Conclusions
Our study illustrates differences in medical students’
academic interest and performance across career choice
motivations. Our findings suggest that understanding
medical students’ career choice motivation may enhance
our knowledge of factors that influence medical students’
learning and performance. Such an understanding can shed
us light on how to select students who are likely to succeed
in medical school and how to better facilitate their learning.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
1. Kusurkar RA, Ten Cate TJ, van Asperen M, Croiset G. Motivation as an
independent and a dependent variable in medical education: a review of the
literature. Med Teach. 2011;33: e242-262.
2. ten Cate O, Snell L, Mann K, Vermunt J. Orienting teaching toward the
learning process. Acad Med. 2004;79: 219-228.
3. Pagnin D, De Queiroz V, De Oliveira Filho MA, Gonzalez NV, Salgado
AE, Cordeiro e Oliveira B, et al. Burnout and career choice motivation in
medical students. Med Teach. 2013;35:388-394.
54
4. Artino AR, La Rochelle JS, Durning SJ. Second-year medical students'
motivational beliefs, emotions, and achievement. Med Educ. 2010;44:1203-
1212.
5. Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, Themmen AP. Motivation,
learning strategies, participation and medical school performance. Med
Educ. 2012;46:678-688.
6. Sobral DT. What kind of motivation drives medical students' learning
quests? Med Educ. 2004;38:950-957.
7. Baxter L, Mattick K and Kuyken W. Assessing health care students'
intentions and motivations for learning: the Healthcare Learning and
Studying Inventory (HLSI). Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract.
2013;18:451-462.
8. Holland C. Critical review: medical students' motivation after failure. Adv
Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015; in press.
9. Pintrich PR, Schunk DH. Motivation in education: theory, research, and
applications. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2001.
10. Deci EL. The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: a self-
determination theory perspective. In: Renninger KA, Hidi S, Krapp A,
editors. The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992.
11. Kim KJ, Park JH, Lee YH, Choi K. What is different about medical
students interested in non-clinical careers? BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:81.
12. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic
definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000;25:54-67.
13. Wilkinson T, Wells J, Bushnell J. Are differences between graduates
and undergraduates in a medical course due to age or prior degree? Med
Educ. 2004;38:1141-1146.
Int J Med Educ. 2016;7:52-55 55