Article

GM sanctions

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

I was disheartened to read the thinly veiled threats made by the heads of leading biotechnology companies about future investment in British bioscience in the light of the outcry about GM crops (This Week, 27 February, p 7). Comments such as “Britain is not the only place where you can do research” and “It will harm investment in the UK” are doubtless meant to coerce scientists into supporting one side, rather than tempering the alarming level of the debate in the media. These companies may say they do not want to work in countries that do not support their research, but it is not the research that is at issue but the commercial exploitation of the products. People and governments have the right to say no to GM foods, wrongly or rightly. The verdict on GM crops must be based on the actual and perceived risk to public health and the environment. The issues should be resolved without the threat by transnationals of what amounts to economic sanctions. Published 20 March 1999 https://www.newscientist.com/letter/mg16121787-000-gm-sanctions/

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.