ArticlePDF Available

A case report: Is it strange to record multiple anomalies in the cephalometric and panoramic radiographs of orthodontic patient?

Authors:

Abstract

During screening of the panoramic and lateral view cephalometric radiographs of two female-and male orthodontic patients, it was strange to found: 1. In the panoramic radiograph of the 19 years old female patient; two rooted radio-opaque structure pointed down word, surrounded by radio-lucent area, in the oropharyngeal region, opposite to another structure of the same shape facing upwards between C2 and C3 and around three radio-opaque cylindrical segments with somewhat radiolucent lumen in the area of stylohyoid ligament. 2. The cephalograms showed Sella-Turcica of abnormal shape and configuration. On the other hand, the panoramic radiograph of the 25 years old male patient two bilateral radio-opaque semi-oval structure at the base of the skull appeared in the radiograph between the condylar head and the coronoid processes.
A preview of the PDF is not available
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
To investigate the prevalence of sella turcica bridges in patients accepted for conventional orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery. The pretreatment lateral cephalograms of 635 subjects scheduled for orthodontic treatment and 113 subjects scheduled for orthognathic surgery were used. The number of subjects with complete sella bridges and the type of discrepancy (Angle Class I, II, or III malocclusions, skeletal Class 2, 3 or bimaxillary protrusion) were recorded. Sella turcica bridges were found in 3.74 per cent of the total sample of 748 subjects. In the orthodontic group 3.21, 2.97 and 7.14 per cent of subjects in the Class 1, II and III subgroups respectively had sella bridges. In the orthognathic surgery group 2.86 and 10.71 per cent of the subjects in the Skeletal 2 and 3 subgroups respectively had sella bridges. No subjects in the bimaxillary subgroup had sella bridges. In the orthodontic group 2.20 per cent of the female subjects and 1.10 per cent of the male subjects had sella bridges, while in the orthognathic surgery group 1.77 of the females and 4.42 per cent of the males had sella bridges. Higher percentages of sella turcica bridges were found in subjects with Angle Class III and skeletal 3 discrepancies compared with subjects with Angle Class I, II, skeletal 2 or bimaxillary protrusion discrepancies.
Article
Full-text available
To detect the prevalence of anatomic anomalies and pathologic findings that could be screened from pretreatment orthodontic radiographs. A thorough screening was conducted of the pretreatment orthodontic radiographs of a sample of 1,354 patients, collected by the author during the last 15 years from 4 locations, 3 in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and 1 in Egypt. A total of 154 significant anomalies and pathologic findings were recorded among the total sample group of 1,354 orthodontic patients (11.4%). Among these, 22 could have a serious effect on the general health of the patient. The findings included fractured odontoid process of the axis vertebra, os odontoideum, spondylolisthesis, fractured surgical needle in the oropharynx, fractured transpalatal archwire swallowed and stuck in patient's throat, unrecognized carotid artery stenosis, cystic lesions, and calcified stylohyoid ligaments. Medicolegal litigation is a main priority for the clinician, requiring cautiousness through screening of the pretreatment orthodontic radiographs beyond orthodontic purposes to exclude patients with significant anomalies and pathological findings. If not done from the medicolegal prospective, such screening should at least take place from an ethical perspective. The orthodontic clinician needs to know when to consult other medical specialties.
Article
Abstract No Abstract Available. From the School of Dentistry, West Virginia University.
Article
The films of 513 consecutive patients from a private practice were brought to Children's Hospital, Los Angeles for reading in their Radiology Department. Eighteen films, 3.5 percent, were classified as having abnormalities or pathologies present. In addition, there were seven findings labeled as interesting, although normal, because they are usually not present on the lateral head film. The lateral orthodontic cephalometric head film can disclose a variety of pathoses which are significant to the physician. The orthodonitist sholld study the lateral head roentgenogram for nondental abnormalities.