ArticlePDF Available

Herbivorous fishes Siganus rivulatus (Siganidae) and Zebrasoma desjardinii (Acanthuridae) feed on Ctenophora and Scyphozoa in the Red Sea

Authors:

Abstract

Individuals of the rabbitfish Siganus rivulatus (Siganidae) and surgeonfish Zebrasoma desjardinii (Acanthuridae) were observed feeding on ctenophores and scyphozoans in the northern Red Sea during late spring and early summer seasons between 2010 and 2015. Siganus rivulatus and Z. desjardinii, considered nominally herbivorous, preyed on relatively large ctenophores until disintegration, and on the moon jellyfish, Aurelia aurita (Scyphozoa), until they sank to the bottom. Siganus rivulatus was the most dominant predatory fish feeding on gelatinous zooplankton (37% of attacks on ctenophores and 51% of attacks on A. aurita). Furthermore, prey individuals were usually approached by two or more fish simultaneously. Eleven additional fish species fed on gelatinous zooplankton with Chaetodon fasciatus (Chaetodontidae) accounting for 27% and 12% of the attacks on ctenophores and A. aurita, respectively, and Z. desjardinii for 17% and 24% of the attacks. Other fishes attacked gelatinous zooplankton in ≤ 6% of the observations. This study constitutes the first record of S. rivulatus and Z. desjardinii preying on ctenophores and also confirms preliminary observations of S. rivulatus feeding on scyphozoans. Although herbivorous fishes may accidentally ingest small invertebrates while feeding on algae, the deliberate feeding on gelatinous zooplankton observed for S. rivulatus and Z. desjardinii suggests that their trophic role should be reevaluated.
1 23
Marine Biodiversity
ISSN 1867-1616
Mar Biodiv
DOI 10.1007/s12526-016-0454-9
Herbivorous fishes Siganus rivulatus
(Siganidae) and Zebrasoma desjardinii
(Acanthuridae) feed on Ctenophora and
Scyphozoa in the Red Sea
Arthur R.Bos, Edwin Cruz-Rivera &
Ashraf M.Sanad
1 23
Your article is protected by copyright and all
rights are held exclusively by Senckenberg
Gesellschaft für Naturforschung and Springer-
Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. This e-offprint is
for personal use only and shall not be self-
archived in electronic repositories. If you wish
to self-archive your article, please use the
accepted manuscript version for posting on
your own website. You may further deposit
the accepted manuscript version in any
repository, provided it is only made publicly
available 12 months after official publication
or later and provided acknowledgement is
given to the original source of publication
and a link is inserted to the published article
on Springer's website. The link must be
accompanied by the following text: "The final
publication is available at link.springer.com”.
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Herbivorous fishes Siganus rivulatus (Siganidae) and Zebrasoma
desjardinii (Acanthuridae) feed on Ctenophora and Scyphozoa
in the Red Sea
Arthur R. Bos
1,2,3
& Edwin Cruz-Rivera
4
& Ashraf M. Sanad
2,5
Received: 8 October 2015 /Revised: 9 January 2016 /Accepted: 24 January 2016
#
Senckenberg Gesellschaft r Naturforschung and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Abstract Individuals of the rabbitfish Siganus rivulatus
(Siganidae) and surgeonfish Zebrasoma desjardinii
(Acanthuridae) were observed feeding on ctenophores and
scyphozoans in the northern Red Sea during late spring and
early summer seasons betwe en 2 010 and 2015. Siganus
rivulatus and Z. desjardinii, considered nominally herbivo-
rous, preyed on relatively large ctenophores until disintegra-
tion, and on the moon jellyfish Aurelia aurita (Scyphozoa)
until they sank to the bottom. Siganus rivulatus was the most
dominant predatory fish feeding on gelatinous zooplankton
(37 % of attacks on ctenophores and 51 % of attacks on A.
aurita). Furthermore, prey individuals were usually
approached by two or more fish simultaneously. Eleven addi-
tional fish species fed on gelatinous zooplankton, with
Chaetodon fasciatus (Chaetodontidae) accounting for 27 and
12 % of the attacks on ctenophores and A. aurita,respectively,
and Z. desjardinii for 17 and 24 % of the attacks. Other fishes
attacked gelatinous zooplankton in 6 % of the observations.
This study constitutes the first record of S. rivulatus and Z.
desjardinii preying on ctenophores and also confirms prelim-
inary observations of S. rivulatus feeding on scyphozoans.
Although herbivorous fishes may accidentally ingest small
invertebrates while feeding on algae, the deliberate feeding
on gelatinous zooplankton observed for S. rivulatus and Z.
desjardinii suggests that their trophic role should be
reevaluated.
Keywords Aurelia aurita
.
Chaetodontidae
.
Cnidaria
.
Gelatinous zooplankton
.
Herbivory
Introduction
Siganid fishes, distributed in the Indo-Pacific and Red Sea, are
herbivorous during their entire life cycles. Siganids preferably
feed on selected algae, cyanobacteria, and seagrasses, but may
temporarily shift their diet to less palatable algae when pre-
ferre d food items are seasonally scarce (Tsud a and Bryan
1973;vonWesternhagen1973; Lundberg and Lipkin 1979).
The diet of Siganus rivulatus Forsskål & Niebuhr, 1775 has
been well studied in the north-western corner of its geograph-
ical range, because first, successful migration from the Red
Sea to the Mediterranean Sea has triggered researchers study-
ing ecological impacts of this invading herbivore (e.g.,
Lundberg and Golani 1995; Shakman et al. 2009;Salaetal.
2011), and second, S. rivulatus is a fast-growing species with
high potential for aquaculture (Bariche 2006; Afeworki et al.
2013).
Herbivorous fishes, such as representatives of the
Acanthuridae, Scaridae and Siganidae, accomplish an impor-
tant ecological function in coral reefs by removing algae.
Communicated by R. Thiel
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article
(doi:10.1007/s12526-016-0454-9) contains supplementary material,
which is available to authorized users.
* Arthur R. Bos
arthurrbos@yahoo.com
1
Department of Biology, American University in Cairo, P.O. Box 74,
New Cairo 11835, Egypt
2
John D. Gerhart Field Station, American University in Cairo,
El-Gouna, Egypt
3
Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300
RA Leiden, The Netherlands
4
Department of Biological Sciences, University of the Virgin Islands,
#2 John Brewers Bay, St. Thomas, USVI 00802, USA
5
Dive Pro Academy, P.O. Box 94, Sahl Hasheesh, Hurghada, Egypt
Mar Biodiv
DOI 10.1007/s12526-016-0454-9
Author's personal copy
Through top down con trol (Fox and Bellwood 2007;
Mantyka and Bellwood 2007), these herbivores prevent corals
from being overgrown by algae and create space for settling
coral larvae (Brandl and Bellwood 2014). Phylogenetically
distinct herbivorous fish taxa show various feeding modes
and preferences in algal diets, but all Siganus and
Zebrasoma species are consistently considered nominally her-
bivorous (Gerking 1994; Choat et al. 2002).
Although not well studied, large gelatinous zooplankton
are part of the diet of pelagic fishes especially during spring
seasons when other food sources are scarce (Mianzan et al.
1996; Purcell and Arai 2001; Milisenda et al. 2014). The ma-
jority of these pelagic fishes are zooplanktivorous or piscivo-
rous and well adapted to feeding on animal tissue. Although
generally considered a food source of low quality for fishes,
some marine gelatinous taxa may provide as much energy as
other prey species (Arai 2005). In that context, Arai (2005)
distinguished fish species as being either generalists or coe-
lenterate specialists. Also, apex predators have been reported
to feed on gelatinous plankton (Cardona et al. 2012), but ref-
erence to herbivores feeding on this resource was not
provided.
While the idea that herbivorous fishes supplement their
diets with animal matter is not new (White 1993; Gerking
1994), surprisingly few observations have demonstrated ac-
tive ingestion of animal foods other than occasional phytal
epifauna. Accidental ingestion of small invertebrates while
feeding on algae has been reported (Foud a and El-Sayed
1994;Bariche2006), but herbivores deliberately selecting an-
imal prey has seldom been observed. Yet, gut content analyses
have demonstrated that certain species of fishes considered
herbivores can ingest considerable amounts of animal material
(Choat et al. 2002). Blooms of jellyfish and ctenophores occur
throughout the Red Sea (Alamaru et al. 2009; Cruz-Rivera and
El-Regal 2015) and provide a readily available, albeit tempo-
rary, resource for consumers, but their utilization by coral reef
fishes is largely unknown. The present study describes the
feeding behavior of the rabbitfish Siganus rivulatus and sur-
geonfish Zebrasoma desjar dinii in relation to gelatinous zoo-
plankton (Ctenophora and Scyphozoa) in the northern Red
Sea.
Materials and methods
Initial observations of the rabbitfish Siganus rivulatus
attacking individuals of the Moon jellyfish Aurelia aurita
(Linnaeus, 1758) were made during a period of jellyfish abun-
dance in patch reefs off the coast of El Gouna, Egypt (approx-
imately 27°20.83N, 33°49.63E), in early July 2010. Such
observations were performed by snorkeling, and a combina-
tion of video and visual records were used. In July 2012, when
A. aurita was present at the same location, a pilot study was
conducted in an attempt to quantify the feeding behavior.
Observations made while SCUBA diving were too few and
we had to wait until May 2015 when a jellyfish bloom (a
combination of ctenophores and A. aurita)infringingreefs
along the coast of Hurghada, Egypt (approximately 27°4.72
N, 33°53.03E), allowed us to continue the quantification of
herbivorous fishes feeding on gelatinous plankton.
Two divers conducted 12 SCUBA dives (roving diving
technique) in May and June 2015 to study fishes feeding on
gelat inous z ooplankton. Prey individua ls, and as a conse-
quence their consumption by fish, were only observed at
0.57 m depth. Prey species, the number of fish per individual
prey, and the species composition of the feeding fish assem-
blage were recorded. Divers collected photo and video docu-
mentation supporting later analysis of the fish behavior. The
earlier observations done in July 2012 were added to the
database.
Results
In May and June 2015, several fish species including herbi-
vores were preying on unknown species of relatively large
ctenophores (length 100 mm; Fig. 1a) and individuals of
the Moon jellyfish Aurelia aurita in coral reefs off
Hurghada, Egypt. The latter had already been observed in
July 2012 in coral reefs off El Gouna, Egypt (Fig. 1b ).
Fishes fed on ctenophores by frequently attacking their bodies
until they disintegrated into fragments (Electronic
Supplementary Material). In the case of scyphozoans, fish
fed on the pulsating bells until the prey organisms sank to
Fig. 1 a Individuals of Siganus rivulatus and Chaetodon fasciatus
feeding on a ctenophore (arrow), b two individuals of S. rivulatus
feeding on Aurelia aurita, c Aurelia aurita showing feeding scars
(arrows) from fish attacks
Mar Biodiv
Author's personal copy
the bottom. Feeding scars were clearly visible on the edge of
the bell (Fig. 1c).
Ctenophores were most frequently preyed upon b y
Siganus rivulatus (37 % of recorded attacks), followed by
Chaetodon fasciatus (27 %) and Zebrasoma desjardinii
(17 %; Table 1). These three species were also the most dom-
inant fishes feeding on Aur elia aurita,withS. rivulatus, C.
fasciatus and Z. desjardinii representing 51, 12 and 24 % of
the attacks, respectively (Table 1). All other fishes feeding on
gelatinous zooplankton accounted for 6 % of the observa-
tions (Table 1). The mean number of 2.3 and 3.3 individuals
per prey for S. rivulatus showed that this species was mostly
represented by two or more predatory fish simultaneously
(Table 1). This was found for ctenophores (Fig. 1a) and for
A. aurita (Fig. 1b). Similarly as observed for S. rivulatus, Z.
desjardinii, Diplodus noct and Chromis weberi were mostly
feeding simultaneously with two or more individuals
(Table 1). Once a prey was attacked, other fish appeared to
join the feeding. The total number of fish predators per prey,
independent of species, ranged from 1 to 8 individuals.
Schools of Abudefduf vaigiensis, Chromis weberi
(Pomacentridae), Caesio suevica (Caesionidae) and
Rastrelliger kanagurta (Cuvier, 1816; Scombridae) were reg-
ularly seen about the feeding fishes, but usually higher in the
water column without directly approaching ctenophores and
individuals of A. aurita. Few initial phase individuals of
Scarus ferrugineus Forsskål, 1775 (Scaridae) were seen ap-
proaching feeding fishes, but actual feeding of the latter spe-
cies was not recorded.
Discussion
In the present study, S. rivulatus actively selected ctenophores
and scyphozoans as prey items. While this species consumes a
wide variety of algae, it feeds less selectively during cold
seasons and is reported to accidentally ingest small inverte-
brates while feeding on algae (Lundberg et al. 2004;Bariche
2006; Shakman et al. 2009). Predation on ctenophores by this
fish has not been previously recorded, and data on consump-
tion of A. aurita have not been presented before. Cruz-Rivera
and El-Regal (2015) observed attacks on the jellyfish Cephea
cephea and concluded that rabbitfishes were the feeding spe-
cies. The direct observations of feeding activity resulting in
scars on the bell of A. aurita (Fig. 1c) c onfirmed that
S. rivulatus feeds on scyphozoans. Moreover, deliberately
feeding on animal tissue by siganids has not been reported
before. Kuo et al. (2015) found the congeneric S. fuscescens
leaving grazing scars on soft coral tissue, but this damage
resulted from feeding on algae growing at the surface of the
soft coral.
Pelagic fishes are known to feed on ctenophores and are
well adapted to utilize this food resource (Mianzan et al. 1996;
Cardona et al. 2012; Milisenda et al. 2014). Similarly, preda-
tion on planktonic cnidarians has been widely documented for
pelagic fishes (Purcell and Arai 2001;Arai2005). In the case
of coral reef fishes, species that have been reported to feed on
gelatinous zooplankton have been predominantly generalist
carnivores (Purcell and Arai 2001; Arai 2005), which was
supported by our findings. Of the 12 fish species recorded to
attack ctenophores and jellyfish in our study in the northern
Red Sea, all but 3 are considered carnivorous, and only 1
(Abudefduf vaigiensis) belongs to a taxon of more specialized
planktivo res (Table 1). Herbivorous fishes find their main
food source in coral reefs or other coastal waters, and are
usually limited to feeding on algae. In the northern Red Sea,
algal growth may vary seasonally, with a decline in algal cover
starting in late spring and early summer (Benayahu and Loya
1977; Mergner and Svoboda 1977). The ability to utilize sea-
sonal blooms of gelatinous zooplankton as an alternative food
Table 1 Fish species (with
taxonomic authority and family
taxon) in order of predation
dominance (%) on Ctenophora
(n = 66) and Aurelia aurita
(n = 20) and mean number of
feeding fish per prey individual
Species Taxonomic authority Family Ctenophora Aurelia aurita
%Mean% Mean
Siganus rivulatus Forsskål and Niebuhr, 1775 Siganidae 37 2.3 51 3.3
Chaetodon fasciatus Forsskål, 1775 Chaetodontidae 27 1.7 12 1.4
Zebrasoma desjardinii (Bennet, 1936) Acanthuridae 17 2.4 24 2.0
Chaetodon auriga Forsskål, 1775 Chaetodontidae 6 1.2 2 1.0
Chromis weberi Fowler and Bean, 1928 Pomacentridae 4 2.3 ––
Thalassoma rueppellii (Klunzinger, 1871) Labridae 3 1.0 ––
Heniochus intermedius Steindachner, 1893 Pomacanthidae 3 1.3 ––
Caesio suevica Klunzinger, 1884 Caesionidae 2 1.0 ––
Naso hexacanthus (Bleeker, 1855) Acanthuridae 1 1.0 ––
Diplodus noct (Valenciennes, 1830) Sparidae –– 62.0
Cantherhinus pardalis (Rüppell, 1837) Monacanthidae –– 32.0
Abudefduf vaigiensis (Quoy and Gaimard, 1825) Pomacentridae –– 21.0
Mar Biodiv
Author's personal copy
source by S. rivulatus and other herbivores would be clearly
advantageous.
Three previous studies suggest that the opportunistic use of
gelatinous zooplankton by herbivorous marine fish may be
underappreciated. First, Senta et al. (1993) reported that sipho-
nophores and thaliaceans (but no algae) were common in the
gut contents of two species of Kyphosus.Ofthese,K.
cinerascens (Forsskål, 1775) has been found to be a predom-
inantly herbivorous species by other researchers using similar
methods (Clements and Choat 1997). Second, gut content
analyses by Choat et al. (2002) found that four species of
unicornfish (Naso spp.) consumed moderate to predominant
amounts of gelatinous zooplankton. Finally, qualitative obser-
vations of predation on the scyphozoan Cephea cephea by S.
stellatus, S. rivulatus and Zebrasoma desjardinii in the Red
Sea have recently been reported (Cruz-Rivera and El-Regal
2015). The acanthurid Z. desjardinii was one of the three
species that readily consumed ctenophores and scyphozoans
in the present study. Taken together, these observations sug-
gest that the trophic role of some coral reef fish, particularly
some siganids, requires a reevaluation.
Acknowledgment We greatly acknowledge the support of Khamis
Elsayed (Dive Pro Academy) for providing an excellent diving
infrastructure.
References
Afeworki Y, Videler JJ, Bruggemann JH (2013) Seasonally changing
habitat use pattern among roving herbivorous fishes in the southern
Red Sea: the role of temperature and algal community structure.
Coral Reefs 32:475485
Alamaru A, Bronstein O, Dishon G, Loya Y (2009) Opportunistic feed-
ing by the fungiid coral Fungia scruposa on the moon jellyfish
Aurelia aurita. Coral Reefs 28:865
Arai MN (2005) Predation on pelagic coelenterates: a review. J Mar Biol
Assoc UK 85:523536
Bariche M (2006) Diet of the Lessepsian fishes, Siganus rivulatus and S.
lurides (Siganidae) in the eastern Mediterranean: a bibliographic
analysis. Cybium 30:4149
Benayahu Y, Loya Y (1977) Seasonal occurrence of benthic-algae com-
munities and grazing regulation by sea urchins at the coral reefs of
Eilat, Red Sea. Proc 3rd Internat Coral Reef Symp 3:383389
Brandl SJ, Bellwood DR (2014) Individual-based analyses reveal limited
functional overlap in a coral reef fish community. J Anim Ecol 83:
661670
Cardona L, Álvarez de Quevedo I, Borrell A, Aguilar A (2012) Massive
consumption of gelatinous plankton by Mediterranean apex preda-
tors. PLoS ONE 7(3):e31329
Choat JH, Clements KD, Robbins WD (2002) The trophic status of her-
bivorous fishes on coral reefs, 1: dietary analyses. Mar Biol 140:
613623
Clements KD, Choat JH (1997) Comparison of herbivory in the closely-
related marine fish genera Girella and Kyphosus. Mar Biol 127:579
586
Cruz-Rivera E, El-Regal MA (2015) A bloom of edible scyphozoan
jellyfish in the Red Sea. Mar Bio div. doi:10.1007/s12526-015-
0381-1
Fouda MM, El-Sayed AM (1994) Distribution and feeding habits of two
surgeonfish, Zebrasoma xanthurum and Ctenochaetus striatus in the
Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea. J KAU Mar Sci 7:233244
Fox RJ, Bellwood DR (2007) Quantifying herbivory across a coral reef
depth gradient. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 339:4959
Gerking SD (1994) Feeding ecology of fish. Academic, San Diego
Kuo FW, Kuo CY, Fan TY, Lui MC, Chen CA (2015) Hidden ecosystem
function of rabbitfishes? Siganus fuscescens feeds on the soft coral,
Sarcophyton sp. Coral Reefs 34:57
Lundberg B, Golani D (1995) Diet adaptations of Lessepsian migrant
rabbitfishes, Siganus luridus and S. rivulatus, to the algal resources
of the Mediterranean coast of Israel. Mar Ecol 16(1):7389
Lundberg B, Lipkin Y (1979) Natural food of the herbivorous rabbitfish
(Siganus spp.) in Northern Red Sea. Bot Mar 22:173182
Lundberg B, Ogorek R, Galil BS, Goren M (2004) Dietary choices of
siganid fish at Shiqmona Reef, Israel. Isr J Zool 50:3953
Mantyka CS, Bellwood DR (2007) Direct evaluation of macroalgal re-
moval by herbivorous coral reef fishes. Coral Reefs 26:435442
Mergner H, Svoboda AHWM (1977) Productivity and seasonal changes
in selected reef areas in the Gulf of Aqaba (Red Sea). Helgo Wiss
Meeres 30:383399
Mianzan HW, Mari N, Prenski B, Sanchez F (1996) Fish predation on
neritic ctenophores from the Argentine continental shelf: a neglected
food resource? Fish Res 27:6979
Milisenda G, Rosa S, Fuentes VL, Boero F, Guglielmo L, Purcell JE,
Piraino S (2014) Jellyfish as prey: frequency of predation and selec-
tive foraging of Boo
ps boops (Vertebrata, Actinopterygii) on the
mauve stinger Pelagia noctiluca (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa). PLoS
ONE 9(4):e94600
Purcell JE, Arai MN (2001) Interactions of pelagic cnidarians and cteno-
phores with fish: a review. Hydrobiologia 451:2744
Sala E, Kizilkaya Z, Yildirim D, Ballesteros E (2011) Alien marine fishes
deplete algal biomass in the eastern Mediterranean. PLoS ONE 6:
e17356
Senta T, Kimura M, Kanbara T (1993) Predation of fishes on open-ocean
species of sea-skaters (Halobates spp.). Jpn J Ichthy 40:193198
Shakman E, Boedeker C, Bariche M, Kinzelbach R (2009) Food and
feeding habits of the Lessepsian migrants Siganus luridus Ruppell,
1828 and Siganus rivulatus Forsskal, 1775 (Teleostei: Siganidae) in
the southern Mediterranean (Libyan coast). J Biol Res Thessalon 12:
115124
Tsuda RT, Bryan PG (1973) Food preference of juvenile Siganus
rostratus and S. spinus in Guam. Copeia 3:604606
von Westernhagen H (1973) The natural food of the rabbitfish Siganus
oramin and S. striolata. Mar Biol 22:367370
White TCR (1993) The inadequate environment: nitrogen and the abun-
dance of animals. Springer, Berlin
Mar Biodiv
Author's personal copy
... Similarly, schools of S. fuscenscens were observed grazing on turf algae growing on the surface of soft corals (Sarcophyton sp.) (Kuo et al. 2015) [9]. Despite Siganus being classified as herbivorous, in the Red Sea, S. rivulatus has been observed feeding on ctenophores and jellyfish (Aurelia aurita and Cephea cephea) (Cruz-Rivera and El-Regal 2016, Bos et al. 2017) [10,11]. ...
... Similarly, schools of S. fuscenscens were observed grazing on turf algae growing on the surface of soft corals (Sarcophyton sp.) (Kuo et al. 2015) [9]. Despite Siganus being classified as herbivorous, in the Red Sea, S. rivulatus has been observed feeding on ctenophores and jellyfish (Aurelia aurita and Cephea cephea) (Cruz-Rivera and El-Regal 2016, Bos et al. 2017) [10,11]. ...
... Interestingly, we also did not observe grazing scars on the polyps (Figure 1b), as was the case for S. fuscensces, which left grazing scars on the soft corals after grazing the turf algae of the colonies (Kuo et al. 2015) [9]. Nonetheless, other Siganus species had been documented eating ctenophores and jellyfish, although they only appeared to be consuming pieces of the ctenophores and jellyfish, rather than stealing food and biting at the same time (Bos et al. 2017) [11]. While no stomach content examination was conducted in the study by Bos et al. (2017) [11] in the Red Sea, the rabbitfish only bite the bell of the jellyfish, not the tentacular area. ...
Article
Full-text available
Herbivorous fishes play important functional roles in coral reef ecosystems, and their influence on mediating competitive dynamics between corals and macroalgae is well studied. Nonetheless, direct interactions between herbivorous fishes and corals may also be relevant, although these are less studied. Here, we describe a series of observations of schools of the herbivorous streaked rabbitfish (Siganus javus) nibbling on black corals (order Antipatharia) at the SS Yongala wreck, within the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. We provide a hypothesis that may explain this behaviour, which, if confirmed, would represent a mechanism influencing the health of the corals. Moreover, this interaction extends the typical coral–algae competition for space paradigm and furthers knowledge of complex relationships between coral reef organisms.
... Due to these modern techniques, the list of jellyfish predators has been growing and now includes commercially important fishes such as herring (Clupea harengus), whiting (Merlangius merlangus), bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) and swordfish (Xiphias gladius) (Cardona et al. 2012;Lamb et al. 2017). Jellyfish were also shown to be of high importance in the diet of the larvae of a critically endangered fish, the European eel, Anguilla anguilla (Ayala et al. 2018) and to be ingested even by herbivorous fishes (Bos et al. 2016). Likewise, cephalopods, anemones, crabs, echinoderms and several species of birds have been reported to feed on jellyfish (Ates 2017;Hoving and Haddock 2017;McInnes et al. 2017;Phillips et al. 2017;Thiebot et al. 2017). ...
... Because decaying medusae are also occasionally observed entangled among the seagrass leaves in the Thau lagoon (R. Marques, personal observation), they might have been ingested together with the target seagrass leaves. However, recent observations have shown that even herbivorous fish may actively prey on jellyfish (Bos et al. 2016), which cannot be excluded here. Still, additional individuals of this species should be analysed to test this hypothesis. ...
Thesis
Jellyfish are important components of marine ecosystems. Their spectacular blooms have severe ecological and socioeconomic impacts and are seemingly boosted by anthropogenic pressures on the marine environment. Concerns regarding increases in jellyfish blooms, at least in some areas of the world, call for a deeper understanding of their drivers. However, many jellyfish have complex life cycles, comprising both benthic and pelagic stages, which complicates the understanding of their blooms and predictions on their future evolution. Furthermore, the lack of knowledge regarding the fates of these large accumulations of biomass hampers the assessment of their impacts. With this regards, the semi-enclosed ecosystem of the Thau lagoon presents the rare particularity to harbour a complete resident population of the jellyfish Aurelia coerulea. Therefore, it offers the ideal background to study the multiple ecological processes affecting the dynamics of both its benthic and pelagic populations. This PhD built on this rare opportunity to precise the drivers and fates of the blooms of A. coerulea. This was accomplished in two steps. First, the benthic population dynamics in the lagoon was investigated and complemented with studies on its drivers and on the trophic ecology of both life stages over one year. To do so, in situ monitoring surveys and both stomach content and stable isotope analyses were employed. Second, the fate of A. coerulea biomass in the lagoon was assessed by investigating fish predation on its pelagic and benthic life stages and by studying the degradation of its medusae once dead on the seabed. This was performed by molecular analysis of fish gut contents and in situ experiments evaluating the decay rates of medusae and the potential role of the benthic fauna in their disappearance. The results obtained highlight a complex interaction of biotic and abiotic environmental parameters, which modulate bloom intensity by jointly influencing both the benthic and pelagic populations of A. coerulea. Temperature, salinity, food availability and predation appear to be the main drivers of the blooms of A. coerulea in Thau, with four critical periods, either boosting or lessening local bloom formation each year. Finally, the biomass produced by A. coerulea blooms has three main fates within the lagoon. The medusae can first be consumed alive by several pelagic predators like fish. Otherwise, when they die and sink to the seabed, some can be consumed by benthic scavengers like gastropods, but most are rapidly remineralised by the local microbial community. These findings shed light on the potential evolution of jellyfish blooms in the face of the ongoing anthropogenic forces on the marine environment, and on their impacts on coastal ecosystems functioning. However, they also highlight how intricate jellyfish blooms forecasting is and stress the need for similar comprehensive studies, not only for other jellyfish species but also in many other parts of the world.
... Usually, they belong to small Polychaeta, molluscs and insect larvae, ingested accidentally when feeding on plants (Shakhman et al. 2009). In the Red Sea, herbivorous fishes (S. rivulatus and 11 more species) feed on jellyfish and ctenophores during periods of low plant food availability (late spring and early summer) (Bos et al. 2017). ...
Article
Eurynotoidiformes are a little-known group of actinopterygian fishes from the Permian of European Russia, characterized by the possession of multicuspid marginal teeth arranged in a single row. Morphologically, the teeth resemble those of Recent Cichlidae, Acanthuridae, Siganidae or Serra-salmidae, suggesting similar trophic adaptations related to herbivory. Tooth histology is similar to the majority of basal actinopterygians (composed of dentine, acrodin and collar enamel). Teeth are ankylosed in their attachment, and labial pleurodont in implantation, strengthening the tooth. The multicuspid tooth crowns derive from conical teeth of predatory or omnivorous ancestors, analogous to the evolution of multicuspid teeth in cichlid fishes. Tooth replacement in eurynotoidiforms is most comparable to an alternating pattern , with a possible simultaneous, unilateral replacement occurring in the whole jaw, similar to characiform fishes. Replacement teeth were formed extraosseously. Teeth of the inner dental arcade were conical. Based on comparisons with the teeth of extant actinopterygians specialized for herbivory, along with functional morphological analysis and consideration of wear patterns, we hypothesize that eurynotoidiforms represent the oldest known actinopterygians specialized for herbivory. Several strategies of herbivory in Recent actinop-terygians were already realized by eurynotoidiforms as early as the Late Palaeozoic (middle and late Permian): grazing/-cutting filamentous algae (Lapkosubia spp., Isadia suchonen-sis), browsing/biting off macrophyte fragments (Isadia aristoviensis), scraping/harvesting periphyton from hard sub-strates (Isadia opokiensis, I. arefievi). However, notable morphological differences in the jaws (elongate) and tooth arrangement (homodont along the jaw, functional teeth separated) suggest that this Permian experiment in herbivory followed different pathways compared to extant taxa.
... The two species, A. tristis and Z. scopas, might have a territorial rivalry which was reported in opposite conditions; however, the variation of surgeonfish may be influenced by several factors such as ontogenetic shifting, and migration according to the food supply or environmental conditions. Herbivorous fishes have been reported having ontogenetic shifting, e.g., Naso brevirostris and Zebrasoma desjardinii (Acanthuridae) and Siganus rivulatus (Siganidae) (Bos et al 2017;Tettamanti et al 2019), and some herbivorous do migration due to degradation of their territorial environment (Magel et al 2020). Some study sites are marine tourism areas and feeding by humans for fish attractions, and other human interactions might influence the fish behavior and community structure. ...
... When jellyfish blooms collapse, this accumulated organic matter has several possible fates. First, it can be consumed or fragmented by pelagic predators and scavengers (Cardona et al., 2012;Bos et al., 2017;Hays et al., 2018;Marques et al., 2019). Otherwise, carcasses sink through the water column (Lebrato et al., 2012) where they can be degraded by pelagic microbial communities (Titelman et al., 2006;Blanchet et al., 2015;Tinta et al. 2016Tinta et al. , 2020. ...
Article
Recurrent jellyfish blooms in the coastal zone call for understanding the impacts of jelly-falls on the functioning of benthic communities, especially in shallow enclosed ecosystems where their biomass can affect local carbon cycling and productivity. Each year, blooms of the jellyfish Aurelia coerulea appear and collapse in a semi-enclosed coastal Mediterranean lagoon (the Thau lagoon, south of France). Although the lagoon is shallow, large accumulations of dead jellyfish are never observed on its bottom, so it was hypothesized that decaying jellyfish were rapidly consumed by local macrobenthic organisms. The current work aimed to test this hypothesis, by estimating the impact of the presence of dead A. aurelia medusae on local macrobenthic community composition and assessing their biomass loss rates under different scenarios of accessibility by the macrobenthos. Unexpectedly, our results revealed a limited role of macrobenthic scavengers in the disappearance of dead medusae, although this later was particularly fast (19–78h). Only one taxon (Tritia sp., Nassariidae family) showed a significant response to the presence of dead A. coerulea medusae on the seabed. Thus, our results suggest that the fast disappearance of dead jellyfish biomass in Thau results from its rapid degradation and consumption by local microorganisms, likely due to the combined effects of high local temperatures and the small size of A. coerulea medusae. Thus, the important biomass produced during A. aurelia blooms in Thau might essentially boost its microbial food web. The potential role of jellyfish blooms in controlling biogeochemical cycles and food web functioning in shallow lagoons is discussed, underlying the need to include this process in ecosystem-based models.
... Although S. rivulatus is herbivorous, it predominantly also feeds on gelatinous zooplanktons (ctenophores and scyphozoans) (Bos et al., 2017). These jellyfish have become abundant in recent years in the Sea of Marmara (Isinibilir, 2012;Isinibilir et al., 2010Isinibilir et al., , 2015Isinibilir & Yılmaz, 2016. ...
Article
The marbled spinefoot, Siganus rivulatus (Forsskål&Niebuhr, 1775) was recorded for the first time in Izmit Bay, Sea of Marmara. One specimen was caught on 30 September 2019 by a small scale fisherman at depth of 25 m. The fish measured 151 mm in total length and weighted of 43.45 g. S. rivulatus is one of the Lessepsian immigrants who entered the Mediterranean more than half a century ago, and has now also easily adapted to the Sea of Marmara, which has a unique two‐layered water system.
... Although not significantly different from the Mediterranean Sea, the trophic position measured for the Red Sea samples of S. rivulatus, described as a pure herbivore (TP = 2.1 ± 0.1) were slightly higher (TP = 2.5 ± 0.5) than previously reported (Woodland, 1990). Recent reports documented these fish eating invertebrates such as ctenophores, scyphozoans, and other invertebrates that are part of the alga biome (Bos et al., 2017;Guy-Haim et al., 2017). Therefore, we conclude that although in many aspects the eastern Mediterranean Sea is a unique environment, the measured variations as compared to other places are not large enough (within the error) to change their assigned trophic position (TP = 2.1 ± 0.1 vs. 2.5 ± 0.5) and, therefore, the equation is robust enough to be more broadly applied. ...
Article
Full-text available
Amino acids compound-specific nitrogen stable isotope analysis (AA-CSIA) is an emerging tool in ecology for understanding trophic system dynamics. While it has been successfully used for several independent studies across a range of environments and study locations, researchers have encountered calculation issues for determining trophic position values. Most studies introduce modifications to the constants of trophic position equation calculations, but then fail to account for the equation variations when comparing across separate research studies. The broad acceptance of this approach is anchored in an underlying presumption that no addition of the exogenous nitrogen atom occurs in the different methods; and therefore, such variations should not affect the outcome. In this paper, we evaluate the use of the EZfaast amino acid derivatization kit (chloroformate) and compare it to the isotopic results of two other derivatization methods. We highlight new considerations for working with AA-CSIA that might account for some of the variations in the results and lead researchers to modify constants in the equation. This study concludes that developing unique constants per derivatization method is required to have more accurate cross-study comparisons of trophic positions.
Article
Full-text available
Species range shifts have manifold consequences on the biota and functioning of recipient ecosystems. A thorough assessment at early dispersal stages may effectively contribute to foreseeing the outcomes implied. Here we capitalised on a combination of interdisciplinary tools to investigate the taxonomy, native ranges, invasion pathways, and impacts of four fish samples exotic to the Mediterranean. These are Zenopsis conchifer and Ephippion guttifer, two neonative species from the Atlantic, and Epinephelus striatus and “Siganus clade C”, two new non-indigenous species (NIS) that are respectively critically endangered in the central-western Atlantic and potentially undescribed and native to the eastern Indo-Pacific. Faunal, molecular, and parasitological analyses suggested that neonatives still had an extra-Mediterranean origin, whereas NIS arrived through shipping. Dietary analyses showed that E. guttifer and E. striatus fed on multiple trophic levels and survived in the area of introduction scavenging on fisheries discards. This study contributes to solving taxonomic issues, shows how stomach content metabarcoding and parasite biotagging can aid monitoring species dispersal, and highlights the potential role of bycatch dumping in NIS spread. Finally, it emphasises how interdisciplinary approaches maximise evidence and proposes a workflow that may be applied to similar circumstances worldwide.
Article
This datasheet on Siganus rivulatus covers Identity, Overview, Distribution, Dispersal, Diagnosis, Biology & Ecology, Environmental Requirements, Natural Enemies, Impacts, Uses, Prevention/Control, Further Information.
Article
Coral reef ecosystems are under increasing anthropogenic pressures making it ever more important to monitor changes in fish communities to implement appropriate management. In contrast to long-term spatial and temporal variation which has been extensively documented, little work has been carried out to identify variability in fish assemblages on short time scales, with few studies testing patterns of fish assemblages between and within days. Here we investigated the diurnal changes in species richness, relative abundance and assemblage composition in a shallow coral reef fish community in Egypt. To do so, a section of coral reef was filmed during the morning (0600 h), midday (1000 and 1400 h) and afternoon (1800 h) over eleven days. Dusk (0600 h) and dawn samples (1800 h) showed higher species richness compared to late morning (1000 h) and mid-day samples (1400 h) and borderline significantly higher numbers of total individuals, likely associated with feeding activity and predator avoidance. Assemblage composition varied across days and time-of-day, showing greater variability during dusk and dawn associated with a transition between day-time and night-time assemblages. Our results have implications for designing coral reef fish surveys, emphasising that short-term changes in fish communities should be considered when designing experiments to monitor fish assemblages over time. Where possible, we suggest increasing replication within sites and time scales or randomising data within a specific time window at all sites, looking to exclude dusk and dawn.
Article
Full-text available
A bloom of the edible jellyfish Cephea cephea (Forskål, 1775) in the Red Sea is reported here from archived photographic evidence. Animals (10-20 centimeters wide) were observed in seven different reefs and accumulated at high densities on some shores of Marsa Alam, Egypt. Various coral reef fishes preyed on this temporary resource. Although the jellyfish is native to the Red Sea this is the first record of such an event in this ecosystem, and only the second record of this phenomenon since the 1800s.
Article
Full-text available
In recent years, jellyfish blooms have attracted considerable scientific interest for their potential impacts on human activities and ecosystem functioning, with much attention paid to jellyfish as predators and to gelatinous biomass as a carbon sink. Other than qualitative data and observations, few studies have quantified direct predation of fish on jellyfish to clarify whether they may represent a seasonally abundant food source. Here we estimate predation frequency by the commercially valuable Mediterranean bogue, Boops boops on the mauve stinger jellyfish, Pelagia noctiluca, in the Strait of Messina (NE Sicily). A total of 1054 jellyfish were sampled throughout one year to quantify predation by B. boops from bite marks on partially eaten jellyfish and energy density of the jellyfish. Predation by B. boops in summer was almost twice that in winter, and they selectively fed according to medusa gender and body part. Calorimetric analysis and biochemical composition showed that female jellyfish gonads had significantly higher energy content than male gonads due to more lipids and that gonads had six-fold higher energy content than the somatic tissues due to higher lipid and protein concentrations. Energetically, jellyfish gonads represent a highly rewarding food source, largely available to B. boops throughout spring and summer. During the remainder of the year, when gonads were not very evident, fish predation switched towards less-selective foraging on the somatic gelatinous biomass. P. noctiluca, the most abundant jellyfish species in the Mediterranean Sea and a key planktonic predator, may represent not only a nuisance for human leisure activities and a source of mortality for fish eggs and larvae, but also an important resource for fish species of commercial value, such as B. boops.
Article
Detailed knowledge of a species’ functional niche is crucial for the study of ecological communities and processes. The extent of niche overlap, functional redundancy and functional complementarity is of particular importance if we are to understand ecosystem processes and their vulnerability to disturbances. Coral reefs are among the most threatened marine systems, and anthropogenic activity is changing the functional composition of reefs. The loss of herbivorous fishes is particularly concerning as the removal of algae is crucial for the growth and survival of corals. Yet, the foraging patterns of the various herbivorous fish species are poorly understood. Using a multidimensional framework, we present novel individual‐based analyses of species’ realized functional niches, which we apply to a herbivorous coral reef fish community. In calculating niche volumes for 21 species, based on their microhabitat utilization patterns during foraging, and computing functional overlaps, we provide a measurement of functional redundancy or complementarity. Complementarity is the inverse of redundancy and is defined as less than 50% overlap in niche volumes. The analyses reveal extensive complementarity with an average functional overlap of just 15·2%. Furthermore, the analyses divide herbivorous reef fishes into two broad groups. The first group (predominantly surgeonfishes and parrotfishes) comprises species feeding on exposed surfaces and predominantly open reef matrix or sandy substrata, resulting in small niche volumes and extensive complementarity. In contrast, the second group consists of species (predominantly rabbitfishes) that feed over a wider range of microhabitats, penetrating the reef matrix to exploit concealed surfaces of various substratum types. These species show high variation among individuals, leading to large niche volumes, more overlap and less complementarity. These results may have crucial consequences for our understanding of herbivorous processes on coral reefs, as algal removal appears to depend strongly on species‐specific microhabitat utilization patterns of herbivores. Furthermore, the results emphasize the capacity of the individual‐based analyses to reveal variation in the functional niches of species, even in high‐diversity systems such as coral reefs, demonstrating its potential applicability to other high‐diversity ecosystems.
Article
Dietary analyses of 17 species of nominally herbivorous fishes on the northern Great Barrier Reef were carried out to resolve the questions to what extent diet in nominally herbivorous reef fishes is dominated by living plant material and whether short-chain fatty acid profiles in the alimentary tract predict diet. The fishes included members of the families Acanthuridae, Scari-dae and Kyphosidae. The analyses revealed consump-tion of a wide range of food resources including macroscopic algae, turfing algae, pelagic and planktonic animal matter, organic detritus and sediments. In only 7 of the 17 species was living algae the dominant dietary item. Gastrointestinal short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) profiles reflecting the fermentative activities of gut symbionts were used as a framework for the initial analysis of dietary patterns. The feeding patterns implied by the SCFA profiles were validated by direct observa-tion of food material through gut content analysis. We identified four main trophic groupings differentiated by fermentation profiles and diet. These were: (1) species with low levels of SCFA in gut samples (mean mM 9.2±0.8) but a high proportion of isovalerate (mean 15.4%±4.7): Acanthurus nigricauda, A. olivaceus, Ctenochaetus striatus, Chlorurus microrhinos, C. sordidus, Scarus schlegeli; (2) species that fed on turfing, fila-mentous and small thallate algae and displayed moder-ate levels of SCFA (mean mM 21.9±2.9): Acanthurus nigricans, A.lineatus, Naso tuberosus; (3) species that fed on large thallate (macroscopic) algae with high levels of SCFA (mean mM 41.2±3.5) with very low proportions of isovalerate (mean 0.5%±0.1): Kyphosus cinerascens, K.vaigiensis, Naso unicornis, Zebrasoma scopas; and (4) species with diets dominated by planktonic animal ma-terial with moderate levels of SCFA (mean mM 21.3±1.5): Naso annulatus, N. brevirostris, N. hexacanthus, N. vlamingii. We conclude that a wide range of dietary items are taken by the 17 nominal herbivores, and that dietary groupings do not reflect taxonomic relationships. There was evidence of con-vergence in feeding modes and diet between phyloge-netically distinct taxa and divergence within particular lineages.
Article
The diet of two Erythrean algivorous siganid fish, Siganus rivulatus and S. luridus, was studied off the Shiqmona vermetid reef, south of Haifa Bay, Israel, in conjunction with the spatial and seasonal variability in composition of the local algal community. The algae identified from the gut contents of reef-dwelling siganid populations indicate that both species feed on the vermetid reef platform, especially in spring. In June, green algae made up 66% of the gut contents of S. rivulatus, whereas brown algae made up 69% of the gut contents of S. luridus. In October, brown algae constituted 90% and 95% of the diet of S. rivulatus and S. luridus, respectively. This is the first record of S. rivulatus feeding on and selecting large amounts of this brown, coarse, leaf-like algae along the Mediterranean coast of Israel. During spring the food niche overlap (Renkonen's measure) was ca. 36%, whereas during autumn it was ca. 80%. The results suggest that in reef-dwelling siganids, weakening of dietary niche-partitioning occurs when the preferred algae are scarce.
Article
The contents of stomach and intestines of specimens of Siganus rivulatus, S. luridus and S. argenteus from the Gulf of Elat were analysed. The percentage of each algal and seagrass species in the diet of the fish was determined. The diet of Siganus spp. was more diverse in the southern part of the Gulf than in the northern one. Near Elat the fish diet reflected the pollution-affected vegetation of the region. S. luridus grazed chiefly brown algae, whereas S. rivulatus and S. argenteus grazed substantial amounts of red and green algae as well. The composition of the diet in two stations was compared to that of the vegetation in order to determine the possible preferences of the fishes. A few red algae, e. g, Champia irregularis were selected by all the three Siganus spp. S. luridus selected Sargassum spp., Lobophora variegata and Cystoseira myrica, which were avoided by S. rivulatus and 5. argenteus. Galaxaura spp, and Halophila stipulacea were selected by S. argenteus, whereas they were avoided by the other siganids.