Content uploaded by Daniela Fera
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Daniela Fera on Jan 09, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
Article
Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2
Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting
the Receptor-Binding Site
Graphical Abstract
Highlights
dHIV-1 TF Env immunization induced potent Tier-2 neutralizing
antibodies (nAbs)
dVaccine-elicited nAbs target CD4bs and mimic autologous
nAbs in infected individual
dAutologous nAb-Env complex structure reveals mechanism
of strain-specific neutralization
Authors
Todd Bradley, Daniela Fera,
Jinal Bhiman, ..., Sampa Santra,
Stephen C. Harrison, Barton F. Haynes
Correspondence
todd.bradley@duke.edu (T.B.),
barton.haynes@duke.edu (B.F.H.)
In Brief
HIV-1 vaccine elicitation of antibodies
against neutralization-resistant (Tier-2)
viruses is rare. Bradley et al. demonstrate
induction of antibodies that can
neutralize a vaccine-matched Tier-2 virus
in a rhesus macaque immunized with HIV
trimers isolated from a HIV-1-infected
individual. Structural analysis revealed
the mechanism of restricted
neutralization breadth.
Accession Numbers
5F6H
5F6I
5F6J
Bradley et al., 2016, Cell Reports 14, 1–12
January 5, 2016 ª2016 The Authors
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.017
Cell Reports
Article
Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2
Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting
the Receptor-Binding Site
Todd Bradley,
1,11,
*Daniela Fera,
2,11
Jinal Bhiman,
4,10
Leila Eslamizar,
5
Xiaozhi Lu,
1
Kara Anasti,
1
Ruijung Zhang,
1
Laura L. Sutherland,
1
Richard M. Scearce,
1
Cindy M. Bowman,
1
Christina Stolarchuk,
1
Krissey E. Lloyd,
1
Robert Parks,
1
Amanda Eaton,
1
Andrew Foulger,
1
Xiaoyan Nie,
1
Salim S. Abdool Karim,
6,7
Susan Barnett,
8
Garnett Kelsoe,
1
Thomas B. Kepler,
9
S. Munir Alam,
1
David C. Montefiori,
1
M. Anthony Moody,
1
Hua-Xin Liao,
1
Lynn Morris,
4,6,10
Sampa Santra,
5
Stephen C. Harrison,
2,3
and Barton F. Haynes
1,
*
1
Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Departments of Medicine, Surgery and Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham,
NC 27710, USA
2
Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
3
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
4
National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg 2131, South Africa
5
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
6
Center for AIDS Program of Research in South Africa, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4013, South Africa
7
Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
8
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
9
Boston University, Boston, MA 02118, USA
10
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2131, South Africa
11
Co-first author
*Correspondence: todd.bradley@duke.edu (T.B.), barton.haynes@duke.edu (B.F.H.)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.017
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
SUMMARY
Antibodies that neutralize autologous transmitted/
founder (TF) HIV occur in most HIV-infected individ-
uals and can evolve to neutralization breadth. Autol-
ogous neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against neutral-
ization-resistant (Tier-2) viruses are rarely induced by
vaccination. Whereas broadly neutralizing antibody
(bnAb)-HIV-Envelope structures have been defined,
the structures of autologous nAbs have not. Here,
we show that immunization with TF mutant Envs
gp140 oligomers induced high-titer, V5-dependent
plasma neutralization for a Tier-2 autologous TF
evolved mutant virus. Structural analysis of autolo-
gous nAb DH427 revealed binding to V5, demon-
strating the source of narrow nAb specificity and
explaining the failure to acquire breadth. Thus, oligo-
meric TF Envs can elicit autologous nAbs to Tier-2
HIVs, but induction of bnAbs will require targeting
of precursors of B cell lineages that can mature to
heterologous neutralization.
INTRODUCTION
The HIV-1 envelope protein (Env) is the primary target of neutral-
izing antibodies (nAbs) (Wyatt and Sodroski, 1998; Zhou et al.,
2007). One major obstacle to developing an effective HIV-1 vac-
cine is finding an immunogen that can elicit broadly nAbs (bnAbs)
with the capacity to overcome variability of the virus and to retain
neutralizing activity for most circulating HIV-1 strains (Burton
et al., 2012; Mascola and Haynes, 2013).
Between 3 and 12 months after HIV-1 transmission, most in-
fected individuals develop autologous, strain-specific nAbs to
the transmitted/founder (TF) virus and TF variants (Ariyoshi
et al., 1992; Richman et al., 2003; Wei et al., 2003). The autolo-
gous nAb response drives viral escape and stimulates additional
specificities of nAbs that neutralize escape viruses (Richman
et al., 2003; Wei et al., 2003). This antibody virus co-evolution
persists throughout infection, and in 20% of individuals, it
leads, after years of infection, to development of high levels of
bnAbs (Doria-Rose et al., 2010; Gray et al., 2011; Liao et al.,
2013a; Tomaras et al., 2011; Walker et al., 2011).
Two recent studies mapped the ontogeny of bnAbs and TF
viruses from the time of transmission to bnAb development
and showed that bnAbs arise from autologous nAb B cell
clonal lineages but that only a small number of the autologous
nAb lineages ultimately evolve to neutralization breadth (Do-
ria-Rose et al., 2014; Liao et al., 2013a). Identification of im-
munogens that can induce nAbs against autologous, neutral-
ization-resistant (Tier-2) viruses is a major challenge for HIV
vaccine design, and examples of vaccine-matched, Tier-2
nAb responses elicited by vaccination in primates are few
(Sanders et al., 2015; Willey et al., 2003). Moreover, no vac-
cine-induced Tier-2 nAbs have yet been isolated and charac-
terized, nor have structures of their Env complexes been
determined.
CAP206 is an HIV-infected African individual who later
developed gp41-targeted bnAbs (Gray et al., 2009a; Morris
Cell Reports 14, 1–12, January 5, 2016 ª2016 The Authors 1
Please cite this article in press as: Bradley et al., Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2 Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the
Receptor-Binding Site, Cell Reports (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.017
et al., 2011). As a critical first step in HIV vaccine design, we
sought to map the autologous nAb response and to elicit
Tier-2 nAbs that mimicked this early autologous nAb response
by immunization with Env proteins isolated over the course of
infection. We report here that immunization of rhesus ma-
caques with HIV-1 TF variants from CAP206 induced strain-
specific nAbs to vaccine-matched Tier-2 autologous viruses
in three of six animals. After only two immunizations, one ma-
caque had a high-titer nAb response that targeted the CD4-
binding site (bs) and mimicked the autologous nAb response
observed in CAP206. We isolated a vaccine-induced nAb
clonal lineage (DH427) that potently neutralized the Tier-2
CAP206 6-month virus and recapitulated the observed plasma
neutralization response. A crystal structure of DH427 in com-
plex with HIV Env showed that DH427 bound close to the
CD4bs but also interacted with variable regions in the HIV
Env (loop E and V5-loop), explaining the restricted neutraliza-
tion breadth and the failure of DH427 to evolve to heterologous
neutralization.
RESULTS
Immunization of Rhesus Macaques Elicits Tier-2
Autologous Neutralization
We tracked the evolution of the CAP206 env gene from the TF vi-
rus until 39 months after transmission (Figure 1A). We selected
the CAP206 TF and six additional representative mutant env
genes from 2-, 6-, 12-, 21-, 24-, and 30-month time points and
produced them as recombinant gp140 oligomers that were pre-
dominately trimers (Figure S1A). The antigenic and functional
epitopes expressed on each of the recombinant CAP206 Envs
were determined by SPR assays (Figure S1B). All Envs bound
to CD4 and mAb A32, which binds well to uncleaved trimers,
and the magnitude of CD4 binding increased in Envs isolated
from later CAP206 time points (Figure S1B). The seven Envs
showed binding to a panel of nAbs and bound to 17b, an anti-
body that binds to the CD4-induced conformation of Env, in
the absence of CD4 (Figure S2). Some Envs lacked binding of
bnAbs that target the CD4bs, and others only reacted weakly,
indicating disruption of canonical CD4bs bnAb epitopes in the
CAP206 Envs.
We immunized six rhesus macaques with a cocktail of
all seven CAP206 recombinant gp140 oligomers and collected
plasma and PBMCs before the first immunization and 2 weeks
after each subsequent immunization (Figure 1B).Wetested
plasma from Env-immunized animals for the presence of
anti-HIV neutralizing activity using the TZM-bl pseudovirus
assay. Plasmas collected before the first immunization
(week 0) and 2 weeks after the last immunization (week 38)
were tested for neutralization of heterologous, neutralization-
sensitive (Tier-1) isolates MN (clade B) and MW965 (clade
C) and of autologous, Tier-2, vaccine-matched isolates
of the seven CAP206 Envs (Figures 1CandS3A). We
observed potent neutralization titers against the Tier-1 MN
and MW965 viruses in all animals. Low levels of neutralizing
activity against Tier-2 autologous viruses were present in
two animals (Figures 1CandS3B).Oneanimal,rhesusma-
caque 5173, had potent plasma neutralization activity against
the Tier-2 autologous 6-month CAP206 TF variant virus (Fig-
ures 1CandS3B).
Neutralization of the 6-month virus emerged in 5173 plasma
2 weeks after the second immunization and was boosted by re-
petitive immunization and persisted throughout the remainder of
the immunization regimen (Figure 1D). Plasma neutralization re-
sponses waned 20 months after the last immunization (data not
shown). Thus, immunization with CAP206 Envs effectively eli-
cited potent Tier-1 heterologous virus neutralization in all six an-
imals and low levels of Tier-2 nAbs in two of them; in one animal,
it rapidly induced an early and robust neutralization response to
an autologous Tier-2 virus.
Immunization-Induced Neutralization Mimics Early
Autologous CAP206 Plasma Neutralization Response
Autologous Tier-2 neutralization in macaque 5173 was specific
for the CAP206 6-month virus. Env sequences that were isolated
from later time points post-infection from CAP206 contained
numerous mutations that were candidate sites of immune pres-
sure. Two of the very first observed Env sequence changes re-
tained in the 6-month Env were in the V1/V2 and V5 regions
(Figure 2A).
Closer inspection of the V5 sequences revealed extensive di-
versity in this region among longitudinal CAP206 Envs. Specif-
ically, the 6-month Env had a five-amino-acid deletion and
lacked a predicted glycosylation site at position 463 (Figure 2B).
To determine whether 5173 neutralization of the 6-month
CAP206 virus targeted V5, we engineered a mutation in the
6-month virus that introduced a glycosylation site at position
463 (S463N). We found persistent plasma neutralization of the
wild-type 6-month virus for samples across the full immunization
period but no neutralization of the glycosylation site variant
(Figure 2C).
To examine the role of mutations in the V5 loop in early autol-
ogous escape of the infecting virus in CAP206, we tested
CAP206 plasma isolated post-infection for the ability to
neutralize the autologous 2-month and 12-month viral isolate.
Early plasma samples exclusively neutralized the 2-month virus,
and only later plasma samples acquired neutralization activity for
the 12-month virus (Figure 2D). When we reverted the 12-month
V5 region back to the 2-month sequence, the chimeric virus
became sensitive to neutralization by early CAP206 plasma
time points. Reverting mutations in the V1V2 in the 12-month
back to the 2-month did not have any effect on early neutraliza-
tion. Thus, the V5 loop was a target for autologous nAbs in
CAP206 after infection and a V5-dependent autologous nAb
response was elicited in a rhesus macaque by immunization
with a CAP206 TF variant.
Immunization Elicited CD4bs Autologous nAbs
We isolated single Env-specific memory B cells from macaque
5173 PBMC using tetramers of the neutralization-sensitive
CAP206 6-month Env as well as the neutralization-resistant
CAP206 30-month Env. Memory cells (CD20
+
and CD27
+
) that
bound the 6-month, but not the 30-month, Env were sorted
into individual wells of a 96-well plate (Figure 3A). The frequency
of 6-month Env-specific memory B cells was 0.07% (Figure 3A).
Single-cell PCR amplification and transient expression of
2Cell Reports 14, 1–12, January 5, 2016 ª2016 The Authors
Please cite this article in press as: Bradley et al., Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2 Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the
Receptor-Binding Site, Cell Reports (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.017
immunoglobulin (Ig) genes of the sorted memory B cells identi-
fied two mAbs (DH427 and DH428) that specifically bound the
CAP206 6-month Env in ELISA (Figure 3B). As expected from
their sensitivity to changes at position 463, DH427 and DH428
competed for binding of soluble CD4 to CAP206 6-month Env
(Figure 3C). Sequences of the heavy- and light-chain Ig genes
showed that DH427 and DH428 are two members of the same
B cell clonal lineage, which used the rhesus orthologs of the hu-
man V
H
3-23 and V
l
2-11 genes (Figures 3D and S4). Members of
the DH427 lineage have short HCDR3s (10 aas); the variable
heavy regions were mutated 4.5% in DH427 and 2.4% in
DH428 (Figure 3D).
DH427 CD4bs Antibody Lineage Neutralized the Tier-2
CAP206 6-Month Virus
DH427 and DH428 neutralized the 6-month virus but did not
neutralize any of the other autologous or heterologous viruses
tested (Figures 4A and S5). Moreover, DH427 and DH428 did
not neutralize the CAP206 6-month virus with an N463 mutation,
recapitulating the pattern of neutralization observed in the 5173
plasma (Figure 4A).
The CAP206 6-month Env lacked a glycosylation site in
V5; introduction of a glycosylation site in V5 of the CAP206
6-month Env eliminated neutralization by both 5173 plasma
and DH427 lineage antibodies. The CAP206 TF Env also lacked
0.003
CAP206 T/F
1 mo
2 mo
6 mo
12 mo
15 mo
21 mo
24 mo
30 mo
33 mo
39 mo
0
2
6
8
12
14
18
20
24
26
30
32
36
38
Week
Plasma sample
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7
Immunization
MF59 + CAP206 gp140
(T/F, 2 month, 6 month, 12 month, 21 month, 24 month, 30 month)
Immunization
Tier-1 Tier-2
AB
C
D
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
02 8 14 20 26 32 38
Week
CAP206 6 month T/F
variant virus
ID50
CAP206 T/F and other
variant viruses
2 month
6 month
12 month
21 month
24 month
30 month
Animal Week B.MN C.MW965 C.CAP206.2mo C.CAP206.6mo C.CAP206.12mo
0 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
38 990 5499 25 <20 28
0 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
38 1036 2125 <20 <20 <20
0 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
38 804 1682 <20 <20 <20
0 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
38 281 2464 <20 437 <20
0 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
38 579 1379 <20 <20 <20
0 <20 <20 <20 <20 <20
38 400 1663 38 <20 <20
5160
5165
5167
5173
5183
5184
Figure 1. Immunization with T/F Envs Elicits Tier-2 Neutralization
(A) Neighbor-joining phylogenic tree of isolated env sequences from South African HIV-1-infected individual CAP206 from the time of transmission to 39 months
post-infection. Red boxes indicate envs selected for production of recombinant immunogens.
(B) Immunization regimen; six rhesus macaques immunized seven times every 6 weeks with a swarm of seven CAP206 Envs. Plasma samples were collected
2 weeks post-immunization.
(C) Plasma neutralization of heterologous Tier-1 and autologous Tier-2 viruses before immunization (week 0) and 2 weeks after the last immunization (week 38)
measured as the plasma dilution at which relative luminescence units (RLUs) were reduced 50% compared to control wells in the TZM-bl neutralization assay
(yellow, ID
50
> 20; orange, ID
50
> 200; red, ID
50
> 1,000).
(D) Plasma neutralization over the course of immunization for rhesus monkey number 5173 of the CAP206 autologous Tier-2 viruses (T/F, 2-month, 6-month,
12-month, 21-month, 24-month, and 30-month) in the TZM-bl neutralization assay. Dashed line indicates immunization time points.
See also Figures S1–S3.
Cell Reports 14, 1–12, January 5, 2016 ª2016 The Authors 3
Please cite this article in press as: Bradley et al., Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2 Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the
Receptor-Binding Site, Cell Reports (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.017
a glycosylation site in V5, but the loop was five amino acid resi-
dues longer (Figure 4B). This virus resisted neutralization by
DH427 and DH428; deletion of the five residues in V5 of the
CAP206 TF virus to match the 6-month virus made it sensitive
to both antibodies (Figure 4C). Thus, both the presence of glyco-
sylation sites and the length of the V5 loop restricted CAP206 vi-
rus neutralization by DH427 and DH428.
Maturation of the DH427 Clonal Lineage
For an analysis of the evolution of the DH427 antibody lineage,
we inferred the intermediate (I1) and the unmutated common
ancestor antibodies of DH427 and DH428. The I1 and mature
antibodies specifically and exclusively bound the CAP206
6-month Env, but there was no detectable binding of this partic-
ular unmutated common ancestor candidate antibody to any of
the recombinant CAP206 Envs (Figures 5A and S6). We showed
that light-chain mutations between the unmutated common
ancestor and I1 determined the difference in DH427/DH428
AB
C
D
Figure 2. Glycosylation of the V5 Loop
Blocks Autologous Tier-2 Neutralization
(A) Highlighter plot showing mutations in the Env
that occur in the longitudinal immunogens from the
T/F sequence.
(B) Amino acid alignment of the CAP206 V5
regions.
(C) Macaque 5173 plasma neutralization of wild-
type and mutant CAP206 6-month viruses over the
course of immunization measured as the plasma
dilution at which RLUs were reduced 50%
compared to control wells in the TZM-bl neutrali-
zation assay.
(D) CAP206 plasma neutralization of autologous
2-month and 12-month viruses compared with
12-month reverted mutant viruses over the course
of infection.
binding by pairing the unmutated com-
mon ancestor heavy chain with the I1 light
chain and vice versa. Only the former had
detectable affinity (Figure 5B). Failure of
the inferred DH427 unmutated common
ancestor to bind the immunogen led us
to consider whether one or more of the
amino acid residues considered to have
come from somatic hypermutation (SHM)
might instead be germline encoded in an
as yet undiscovered rhesus macaque V
l
allelic variant, leading to an incorrect
inference for the unmutated common
ancestor.
We examined the germline IGLV2-F
sequence in macaque 5173 by targeted
genomic amplification and sequencing
of extracted genomic DNA (Figure S7).
Sequencing of individual colonies de-
tected an IGLV2-F allele (IGLV2-F*02)that
shared three of the four residues that we
had considered mutated in I1 (Figure 5C).
We then sequenced the IGLV2-F allele in the five remaining ani-
mals in the immunization study and found IGLV2-F*02 in the
genomic DNA of all five (Figure S6C). From these results, we de-
signed a new unmutated common ancestor (UCA2) by incorpo-
rating the new germline light-chain allele. We found that inferred
UCA2 bound the 6-month Env, indicating that UCA2 was the
authentic initiator of the DH427/DH428 B cell lineage (Figure 5D).
The UCA2 antibody did not neutralize the 6-month virus,
but both DH471 I1 and the chimeric (unmutated common
ancestor V
H
:I1V
L
) antibody did neutralize this virus (Fig-
ure 5E). These results indicated that autologous neutralization
activity required a specific sequence of light-chain affinity
maturation.
DH427 Unmutated Common Ancestor Reacts with Host
Protein FAM21C
Two macaques (5160 and 5184) had weak autologous nAb
responses, one (5173) had a robust autologous nAb response,
4Cell Reports 14, 1–12, January 5, 2016 ª2016 The Authors
Please cite this article in press as: Bradley et al., Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2 Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the
Receptor-Binding Site, Cell Reports (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.017
and three (5165, 5167, and 5183) had no autologous nAb res-
ponse, yet all had received the same vaccine immunogen.
This variability in the response suggested that host factors
limited high levels of responses in the other five animals. To
examine the role of cross-reactivity with host antigens for the
development of Tier-2 nAbs, we tested each immunized ma-
caque’s plasma pre- and post-immunization for reactivity to
common auto-antigens recognized by individuals with autoim-
mune disease (Figure S7D). We did not detect significant anti-
body polyreactivity in plasma for any of the auto-antigens
tested.
Next, we tested the DH427 lineage for reactivity with the
same auto-antigens and did not detect reactivity (Figure S7E).
We then tested DH427 and the DH427 unmutated common
ancestor antibodies for reactivity to >9,400 human proteins
on a microarray (Figure 5F). We found that neither DH427
nor the unmutated common ancestor were polyreactive, but
the unmutated common ancestor did react strongly with a sin-
gle host protein Family of Sequence Similarity 21, Member C
(FAM21C; Figure 5F; Table S1). FAM21C is a member of the
WASH complex that is involved in intracellular trafficking (Go-
mez and Billadeau, 2009). These data raise the hypothesis that
reactivity with auto-antigens may have blocked the initial
maturation and/or expansion of DH427-like lineages in the
other five macaques while having the correct germline V
L
allele.
010
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
0
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
gp140CAP206 30 month
gp140CAP206 6 month
0.065 %
A
Log AUC
CAP206 T/F
CAP2062mo
CAP2066mo
CAP206 12mo
CAP20621mo
CAP20624mo
CAP206 30mo
0
5
10
15 DH427
DH428
B
C
Antibody Concentrati on [µg/ml]
% Blocking
1 10 100
0
20
40
60
80
100 DH427
DH428
Synagis
sCD4
Antibody
ID
Rh VH
gene
(Hu Orth)
HCDR3
Length
(AA)
VH
Mutation
(nt %)
VH
Mutation
(AA %)
Rh VLgene
(Hu Orth)
LHCDR3
Length
(AA)
VL
mutation
(nt %)
VL
mutation
(AA %)
DH427 3-J (3-23) 10 4.5 9.9 λ2-F (2-11) 10 4.9 10.0
DH428 3-J (3-23) 10 2.4 5.9 λ2-F (2-11) 10 3.0 7.8
D
Figure 3. Isolation of Antibodies that Specif-
ically Target the CAP206 6-Month Env
(A) PBMCs from macaque 5173 at week 38 after the
seventh immunization were used for sorting CD20
+
CD27
+
memory B cells that specifically reacted
with the 6-month Env and not the 30-month Env.
(B) Binding of isolated mAbs DH427 and DH428 to
the seven CAP206 Env immunogen proteins by
ELISA.
(C) Cross-competition of sCD4-Ig binding to the
CAP206 6-month Env by DH427, DH428, and RSV
antibody Synagis determined by ELISA.
(D) Genomic characteristics of DH427 and DH428.
See also Figure S4.
Structure of DH427 in Complex with
HIV-1 gp120
The DH427/DH428 vaccine-induced line-
age blocked CD4 binding and neutralized
an autologous Tier-2 virus, but its genetic
characteristics differed from those of
most CD4bs nAbs. We crystallized and
determined at 6.6 A
˚resolution the struc-
ture of the DH427 Fab in complex with a
recombinant variant of the ZM1766.66
gp120 that had the CAP206 6-month V5-
loop sequence. We also determined the
structures of the DH427 and DH428 Fabs
at 2.66 A
˚and 2.32 A
˚resolution, respec-
tively (Table S2).
The DH427 Fab associates with HIV
gp120 along an outer rim of the CD4-bind-
ing surface. CDRH2 and CDRH3 contact the V5 loop, and CDRL1
and CDRL3 contact loop E (Figure 6A). The limited resolution did
not allow detailed description of side-chain interactions. We su-
perposed onto the gp120 core domain from our complex the
structure of the gp120 core domain bound with soluble CD4.
The bulk of the Fab was large enough to block CD4 binding,
even though their overlapping footprints differed substantially
(Figure 6B). In contrast, the CD4bs bnAb VRC01 contacts
conserved residues in the V5 loop and has more contacts in the
CD4bs than DH427, allowing for more-effective CD4 blocking
and broad antigen recognition (Figure 6B). Mutability of V5, at
the core of their contact, and a very frequently foundglycosylation
site at position 355 on loop E clearly accounted for the restricted
breadth of DH427and DH428. For example, the glycan at position
463 would projectdirectly into the face of the antibody (Figure 6C).
Thus, further affinity maturation would be unlikely to generate
much-greater neutralization breadth.
Superposition of the gp120 outer domain from its complex
with DH427 onto the homologous domain in the BG505 SOSIP
gp140 structure shows that the Fab would project laterally
from the periphery of the trimer (Figure 6D). DH427 is in almost
the same orientation as the CD4bs bnAb VRC01 but displaced
outward by about 25 A
˚. This angle is also distinct from the proto-
typical Tier-1-neutralizing CD4bs mAb F105, which projects in a
more-axial direction, making it prone to steric hindrance on the
‘‘closed’’ trimers of Tier-2 viruses (Figure 6D).
Cell Reports 14, 1–12, January 5, 2016 ª2016 The Authors 5
Please cite this article in press as: Bradley et al., Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2 Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the
Receptor-Binding Site, Cell Reports (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.017
DISCUSSION
Recent studies show that bnAb lineages can evolve out of autol-
ogous nAb lineages present early in HIV-1 infection (Doria-Rose
et al., 2014; Liao et al., 2013a; Wibmer et al., 2013). All HIV-1-in-
fected individuals produce autologous Tier-2 nAbs months after
transmission, but not all HIV-infected individuals go on to make
bnAbs (Bar et al., 2012; Doria-Rose et al., 2010; Gray et al.,
2009b; Kwong et al., 2013; Richman et al., 2003; Wei et al.,
2003). Thus, eliciting strain-specific nAbs that target neutraliza-
tion-resistant Tier-2 viruses can be a first step to develop bnAbs
during vaccination. CAP206 is an HIV-infected individual that
produced bnAbs targeting the MPER, but we found that the V5
loop was a target for autologous nAbs early after infection in
CAP206. Thus, in CAP206, the autologous nAb response was
unrelated to the bnAb response. Our finding that, after only
two immunizations with a swarm of CAP206 Envs, the CAP206
6-month variant of the TF Env induced in one of six rhesus ma-
caques potent autologous Tier-2 nAbs that targeted a similar
nAb epitope observed in CAP206 shows that vaccination with
gp140 oligomers can, in principle, also produce such antibodies.
However, that only three macaques had autologous nAbs, and
only one with high titers, contrasts with HIV infection, in which
virtually all HIV-infected individuals make autologous nAbs.
These studies raise several important issues for HIV vaccine
development.
First, our structural studies of DH427 CD4bs autologous nAb
demonstrated that DH427 neutralization was restricted to the
autologous virus because antibody recognition centers on the
V5 loop. Moreover, the mode of V5 contact prevented full
engagement of the CD4bs and explains why this lineage is un-
likely to achieve bnAb breadth with further affinity maturation.
Second, it is a conundrum that all HIV-infected individuals
make autologous nAbs and up to 50% make some level of
bnAbs, whereas no humans vaccinated with Envs have to date
made either autologous nAbs or bnAbs. All the macaques in
the group studied had the IGLV2-F germline allelic variant, and
thus, all had the required V
L
repertoire to respond to Env immu-
nization. One hypothesis is that there may be host control mech-
anisms for autologous nAbs in both macaques and humans and
that the responding macaque (5173) was permissive for release
of antibodies that can recognize a closed or Tier-2 envelope.
There was no reactivity with auto-antigens common in autoim-
mune disease by the plasma or DH427 lineage antibodies, but
the DH427 unmutated common ancestor antibody did react
with host protein FAM21C. This reactivity may have limited
expansion of this lineage in the other animals.
Broad neutralization appears only after years of persistent
infection, in part because breadth requires high levels of SHM,
even for those antibodies with relatively invariant Env contacts
(Kepler et al., 2014; Kwong and Mascola, 2012; Scheid et al.,
2009, 2011). Driving high SHM by vaccination is particularly diffi-
cult, because many highly mutated antibodies are disfavored by
the host immune system (Haynes and Verkoczy, 2014). DH427
lineage antibodies required SHM for neutralization, but they
were less than 5% mutated and were induced rapidly after
only two immunizations. Thus, the DH427 lineage achieved
potent Tier-2 autologous neutralization with minimal SHM.
Finally, HIV Env shifts from a ‘‘closed’’ to an ‘‘open’’ conforma-
tion when CD4 binds (Liu et al., 2008). In that transition, it ex-
poses epitopes concealed in the closed state. Any particular
Env is in equilibrium between closed and open (and probably
one or more intermediate) states (Julien et al., 2013; Pugach
et al., 2015). The key structural correlate of the distinction be-
tween Tier-1 and Tier-2 is whether this equilibrium is strongly
on the side of the closed conformation (Tier-2, primarily bnAb
site accessible) or more frequently toward the open conforma-
tion (strain-specific and non-neutralizing sites accessible). A
recent study demonstrated that a stabilized recombinant
native-like closed trimer Env (BG505 SOSIP.664) elicited nAbs
to the sequence-matched Tier-2 virus in rabbits and in three of
four macaques (Sanders et al., 2015). In the Sanders et al. study
in macaques, the titers of autologous nAbs ranged from 32 to
168, similar to the titers observed in an earlier study by Willey
et al. (40–113) and in the present study (25–437).The immunogen
used here was a trimeric Env, but not a variant (such as BG505
SOSIP.664) locked into a closed state by intentional modifica-
tion. Nonetheless, it elicited potent autologous nAbs, and in at
least the one lineage we have studied, those nAbs recognized
a site accessible of the surface of a Tier-2 virus and thus, by infer-
ence, on the surface of a closed trimer. Although the DH427 nAb
Env epitope appears to be too variable, both in the length of the
loops and in their potential for glycosylation, to be a target for
bnAbs, its proximity to the CD4bs and its dependence on similar
conformational parameters suggest that related vaccine
immunogens could also induce the germline precursors of
CD4bs bnAbs. Indeed, whereas most Env immunogens fail to
engage germline-reverted CD4bs-directed bnAbs, including
A
Virus DH427 DH428
CAP206 6mo 0.02 0.02
CAP206 6mo
S463N >50 >50
Virus DH427
DH428
CAP206 T/F >50
>50
CAP206 T/F.
6moV5 0.04
4.20
LTRDKDPGQENSNTETFRP
LTRDKD-----SNTETFRP
452 470
CAP206 V5 Sequences
T/F
T/F.6moV5
BC
Figure 4. DH427 and DH428 Neutralize the
Tier-2 CAP206 6-Month Virus
(A) Neutralization of the CAP206 6-month virus and
engineered glycosylation site mutant measured as
the antibody concentration at which RLUs were
reduced 50% compared to control wells (IC
50
) in the
TZM-bl neutralization assay (mg/ml).
(B) CAP206 T/F V5 sequence and mutated V5
sequence to match the 6-month Env. Red amino
acids were deleted.
(C) DH427 and DH428 neutralization of the T/F and
T/F mutant that had a V5 that matched the 6-month
Env in the TZM-bl neutralization assay (mg/ml; or-
ange, IC
50
< 5.0; red, IC
50
< 1.0).
See also Figure S5.
6Cell Reports 14, 1–12, January 5, 2016 ª2016 The Authors
Please cite this article in press as: Bradley et al., Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2 Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the
Receptor-Binding Site, Cell Reports (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.017
AB
C
DE
F
(legend on next page)
Cell Reports 14, 1–12, January 5, 2016 ª2016 The Authors 7
Please cite this article in press as: Bradley et al., Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2 Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the
Receptor-Binding Site, Cell Reports (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.017
germline-reverted VRC01 (McGuire et al., 2013; Zhou et al.,
2010), eliminating glycosylation sites in loop D and V5, as
in the CAP206 6-month variant that induced the DH427 lineage,
allowed DH427 germline-Env binding and B cell lineage develop-
ment. Incorporating these sites, along with truncation or deletion
of V5, into future Env immunogens may have a useful role in prim-
Figure 6. Structure of DH427 in Complex
with HIV gp120
(A) DH427 contact sites within the V5 loop and loop
E (DH427, orange; gp120, gray; V5 loop, red; loop
E, purple; PDB 5F6J).
(B) DH427 in complex with gp120 core with VRC01
(PDB 3NGB) and CD4 (PDB 1GC1) molecule su-
perimposed (DH427, orange; gp120, gray; V5 loop,
red; VRC01, pink; CD4 molecule, yellow).
(C) Co-crystal structure of DH427 and HIV Env
with N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) displayed as
spheres at the V5 glycan site that would interfere
with DH427 heavy chain.
(D) Modelingof DH427, VRC01, and F105 (PDB 3HI1)
onto the high-resolution cryo-EM trimer structure of
BG505 SOSIP (BG505 SOSIP trimer [PDB 3J5M],
gray) side view (top) and top view (bottom).
See also Table S2.
ing B cell responses to the CD4bs. More-
over, modifying the CAP206 Env to have a
more-closed structure by SOSIP modifi-
cation may also increase immunogenicity.
Such structural considerations coupled
with understanding host control of induc-
tion of nAbs should lead to design of stra-
tegies for inducing autologous nAbs to
Tier-2 HIV with greater heterologous
neutralization breadth (Liao et al., 2013a).
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Donor Subject
CAP206 is an HIV-1 subtype C chronically infected
individual used for this study. This participant was
part of the CAPRISA 002 Acute infection cohort
whose antibody neutralization profile has been
studied since the point of seroconversion (Gray
et al., 2007, 2009b). This study was approved by
the IRBs of the Universities of KwaZulu Natal and
Witwatersrand in South Africa and Duke University. Written informed consent
was obtained from all study participants.
Design and Production of Recombinant gp140 Proteins Derived from
CAP206
The cloning and sequencing of env sequences was performed as described
previously from longitudinal samples from CAP206 (L.M., unpublished data;
Figure 5. Reconstruction of the DH427 Clonal Lineage
(A) Binding of DH427, DH428, and the inferred intermediate (I1) and unmutated common ancestor (UCA) to the CAP206 6-month Env measure by SPR. An-
tibodies were immobilized on a CM5 chip, and protein was flowed over at 100 mg/ml.
(B) Binding of the DH427 I1 and I1-UCA hybrids to the CAP206 6-month Env measured by ELISA.
(C) Amino acid alignment of the germline IGVL2-F*01 with DH427 UCA and I1 antibodies compared with IGVL2-F*02 allele discovered by sequencing the IGVL2-F
genomic DNA from animal 5173.
(D) Binding of newly designed DH427 UCA (DH427 UCA2) to the CAP206 6-month Env by SPR. DH427 UCA2 was immobilized on a CM5 chip, and protein was
flowed over at the indicated concentrations.
(E) Neutralization of DH427 I1, UCA2, and chimeric (UCA V
H
:I1V
L
) of the CAP206 6-month virus and glycosylation site mutant measured as the antibody con-
centration (mg/ml) at which RLUs were reduced 50% compared to control wells (IC
50
) in the TZM-bl neutralization assay.
(F) Reactivity of DH427UCA2 and DH427 on a panel of 9,400 human proteins tested using a ProtoArray microchip compared with a nonreactive rhesus mAb. Axis
values are relative fluorescent signal intensity. Each dot represents an average of duplicate array proteins. Dashed lines indicate 500-fold signal/background ratio
as cutoff for reactivity.
See also Figures S6 and S7 and Table S1.
8Cell Reports 14, 1–12, January 5, 2016 ª2016 The Authors
Please cite this article in press as: Bradley et al., Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2 Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the
Receptor-Binding Site, Cell Reports (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.017
Gray et al., 2007; Keele et al., 2008). The single TF and six mutant clones from
later time points (CAP206 TF, 2 months, 6 months, 12 months, 21 months,
24 months, and 30 months) were selected for production as soluble gp140
trimeric immunogens. The recombinant Envs were expressed in 293T cells
and purified using lectin and size-exclusion chromatography as described pre-
viously (Liao et al., 2013b).
Immunization of Rhesus Macaques
Six rhesus macaques each received seven intramuscular immunizations at 6-
week intervals with seven CAP206 Env immunogens (100 mg total) in MF59
adjuvant (Novartis). Blood samples were collected 2 weeks after each immu-
nization. All rhesus macaques were housed at Bioqual. All rhesus macaques
were maintained in accordance with the Association for Assessment and
Accreditation of Laboratory Animals with the approval of the Animal Care
and Use Committees of the NIH and Harvard Medical School. Research was
conducted in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act and other federal stat-
utes and regulations relating to animals and experiments involving animals
and adheres to principles stated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Labora-
tory Animals, NRC Publication, 2011 edition.
Antibody Isolation
CAP206 6-month gp140 and CAP206 30-month gp140 proteins were fluores-
cently labeled with AF647 and BV421 (Invitrogen), respectively. Peripheral
blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from rhesus monkey 5173 at week 38
were stained with fluorescently labeled antibodies for cell surface markers
and both CAP206 Envs. Memory B cells that were stained positive for the
CAP206 6-month Env and not the CAP206 30-month Env were sorted into sin-
gle wells of 96-well PCR plates containing RT-PCR buffer as previously
described (Wiehe et al., 2014). Antibody variable heavy and variable light
genes were amplified using nested PCR and purified and sequenced as
described previously (Wiehe et al., 2014). VDJ arrangements, clonal related-
ness, and identification of the intermediate and unmutated common ancestor
were inferred using previously described computational methods (Kepler,
2013; Munshaw and Kepler, 2010).
Sequencing of Germline Variable Region
Genomic DNA was isolated from all six animals from PBMCs at 2 weeks af-
ter the first immunization (QIAmp DN A Blood mini kit; QIAGEN). IGLV2 -F se-
quences were amplified using two independent primer sets. To ensure
amplification of non-rearranged variable sequences, both primer sets
reverse primers aligned to sequences present in the non-coding genomic
DNA downstream the V-recombination site. The forward primer for set 1
resided in the IGV2-F leader sequence and upstream of the leader in set
2. The PCR fragments were cloned into a pcDNA2.1 (TOPO-TA kit; Life
Technologies) and transformed into bacteria for sequencing of individual
colonies.
Expression of Recombinant Antibodies
Transient small-scale expression of antibodies was achieved by assembling
VH, VK, or VL sequences with linear cassettes that contain the CMV pro-
moter, respective Ig constant region, and poly A signal sequence using over-
lapping PCR and transfection into 293T cells as described previously (Liao
et al., 2009). Supernatants were directly used to screen for binding of Env an-
tigens in ELISA.
For production of purified recombinant mAbs, the VH and VL genes from
DH427 lineage antibodies were cloned into expression vectors and expressed
and purified as described previously (Liao et al., 2011). Site-directed mutagen-
esis of antibody genes was performed using the Quikchange II lightening multi-
site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent).
ELISA binding of transiently transfected supernatants and purified re-
combinant mAbs was performed as described previously (Liao et al.,
2011).
Surface Plasmon Resonance
Surface plasmon resonance assays were performed on a BIAcore 4000 in-
strument, and data analysis was performed with BIAevaluation 4.1 soft-
ware (BIAcore). Anti-gp120 mAbs or sCD4 in 10 mM Na-acetate buffer
(pH 4.5) were directly immobilized to CM5 sensor chips using a standard
amine coupling protocol for protein immobilization. Purified CAP206 Env
glycoproteins were flowed over CM5 sensor chips at concentrations of
2–100 mg/ml. Binding of CAP206 envelope proteins was monitored in
real time at 25C with a continuous flow of PBS (150 mM NaCl, 0.005%
surfactant P20 [pH 7.4]) at 10–30 ml/min (Alam et al., 2011; Gao et al.,
2014).
Neutralization Assays
Neutralization activities of animal plasma and purified antibodies were deter-
mined by the TZM-bl cell-based neutralization assay (Sarzotti-Kelsoe et al.,
2014). Tier phenotyping of the pseudoviruses was assayed by sensitivity to
a pool of HIV-infected serum as described previously (Seaman et al., 2010).
Antibody Reactivity with Host Proteins
The polyreactivity of the DH427 lineage was assayed in the AtheNA multi-lyte
system (Zeus Scientific). The rhesus mAbs were also tested for reactivity with
human host cellular antigens using ProtoArray 5 microchip (Life Technologies)
compared to a rhesus isotype-matched control antibody as described previ-
ously (Yang et al., 2013).
Expression and Purification of Proteins for Crystallization
The heavy- and light-chain variable and constant domains of the DH427 and
DH428 Fabs were cloned into the pVRC-8400 expression vector using Not1
and Nhe1 restriction sites and the tissue plasminogen activator signal
sequence. The C terminus of the heavy-chain constructs contained a non-
cleavable 63histidine tag. Fabs were expressed and purified as described
previously (Fera et al., 2014).
The codon-optimized synthetic construct of the ZM176.66 HIV-1 subtype C
gp120 containing aa 41–492 (HXB2 numbering) DV123 (core) was produced by
GenScript with an N-terminal 63-histidine tag and inserted into the pVRC-
8400 expression vector as described for Fabs. The V5 loop of this gp120
core was mutated to that of the CAP206 6-month envelope by site-directed
mutagenesis using manufacturer’s protocols (Stratagene) and expressed in
293S GnTi-suspension adapted cells using linear PEI. After 5 days of expres-
sion, supernatants were clarified by centrifugation and passed over galanthus
nivalis lectin resin pre-equilibrated with 13PBS. Bound protein was washed
with 13PBS and eluted with 13PBS and 500 mM methyl a-D mannopyrano-
side. The glycoprotein was then deglycosylated overnight at 37C with Endo
H in a buffer of 50 mM sodium acetate (pH 6.0), 5 mM EDTA, 500 mM NaCl,
1mg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mg/ml aprotonin. Deglycosylated gp120 core was
then purified by gel filtration chromatography in buffer B (2.5 mM Tris [pH
7.5], 350 mM NaCl, and 0.02% sodium azide) using a superdex 200 analytical
column (GE Healthcare). To make the complex for co-crystallization, DH427
and the ZM176.66 gp120 mutant were mixed in a 1.2:1 molar ratio and incu-
bated for at least 1 hr before passing over a superdex 200 preparatory column
(GE Healthcare) in buffer B. Fractions corresponding to the complex were
combined and concentrated to 10 mg/ml for co-crystallization trials.
Crystallization, Structure Determination, and Refinement
All His-tagged Fabs were crystallized at 15 mg/ml, and the DH427/ZM176.66
mutant gp120 core complex was crystallized at 10 mg/ml. Crystals were
grown in 96-well format using hanging drop vapor diffusion and appear ed after
24–48 hr at 20C. DH427 crystals were obtained in a condition of 20% polyeth-
ylene glycol (PEG) 2K monomethyl ether (MME), 100 mM sodium citrate (pH
4.0), and 100 mM NaCl; and DH428 crystals were grown over a reservoir of
40% PEG 400 and 100 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.0). Initial crystals of
DH427/gp120 core complex were obtained in a condition of 1.5 M ammonium
sulfate and 100 mM Tris (pH 8.0) and were optimized to 24-well format to
obtain larger crystals. All crystals were harvested and cryoprotected by the
addition of 20%–25% glycerol to the reservoir solution and then flash cooled
in liquid nitrogen. Crystals of complex were cryoprotected with a series of
different cryoprotectants including 15%–30% glycerol, 15%–30% ethylene
glycol, and 1 or 2 M sodium malonate; however, the best diffraction was ob-
tained with 20%–30% glycerol or ethylene glycol as the cryoprotectant.
Diffraction data were obtained at 100 K from beam lines 24-ID-C and 24-
ID-E at the Advanced Photon Source using a single wavelength. Data sets
Cell Reports 14, 1–12, January 5, 2016 ª2016 The Authors 9
Please cite this article in press as: Bradley et al., Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2 Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the
Receptor-Binding Site, Cell Reports (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.017
from individual crystals (two crystals for DH427 and one crystal for DH428)
were processed with HKL2000 (Otwinowski and Minor, 1997) and XDS
(Kabsch, 2010) for DH427 and DH428, respectively. Molecular replacement
calculations for the free Fabs were carried out with PHASER (McCoy, 2007),
using I3.2 from the CH103 lineage (PDB ID 4QHL) as the starting model. The
I3.2 model was separated into its variable and constant domains for the
DH427 and DH428 Fab structure determinations. Crystals of the DH427 and
DH428 Fabs had four and one molecules per asymmetric unit, respectively.
For both Fabs, subsequent refinement steps were carried out with PHENIX
(Adams et al., 2010), and all model modifications were carried out with Coot
(Emsley and Cowtan, 2004). During refinement, maps were generated from
combinations of positional, group B-factor, and TLS (translation/ libration/
screw) refinement algorithms. Secondary-structure restraints were included
at all stages for all Fabs; noncrystallographic symmetry restraints were applied
to the DH427 Fab throughout refinement.
Data from multiple crystals of the DH427/gp120 core complex were pro-
cessed using HKL2000 (Otwinowski and Minor, 1997), and molecular replace-
ment calculations were carried out with PHASER (McCoy, 2007), using the
refined DH427 coordinates and gp120 core from the VRC01/gp120 complex
(PDB ID 4LST) as the starting models. DH427 was separated into its variable
and constant domains for structure determinations. There were two molecules
per asymmetric unit. The resulting electron density map for the complex was
further improved by solvent flattening, histogram matching, and noncrystallo-
graphic symmetry averaging using the program Parrot (Winn et al., 2011).
Phase combination was disabled in these calculations. After density modifica-
tion, rigid-body refinement was performed using Refmac in Coot.
Structure validations were performed periodically during refinement using
the MolProbity server (Davis et al., 2007). The final refinement statistics are
summarized in Table S1.
Protein Structure Analysis and Graphical Representations
The core domain of the chimeric ZM176.66 gp120 core mutant designed in our
study was superposed on other gp120 cores from the PDB by least-squares
fitting in Coot. All graphical representations with protein crystal structures
were made using PyMol.
ACCESSION NUMBERS
The accession numbers for the rhesus antibodies reported in this study are
GenBank: KU216183–KU216190. The accession numbers for the structures
of DH427, DH428, and DH427-Env complex reported in this paper are PDB:
5F6H, PDB: 5F6I, and PDB: 5F6J, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Supplemental Information includes seven figures and two tables and can be
found with this article online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.017.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
T.B. isolated and characterized antibodies, designed assays, analyzed and
interpreted data, and wrote and edited the manuscript. D.F. conducted
structural and sequence analyses, protein expression, data analyses and
interpretation, and edited the manuscript. J.B. performed CAP206 plasma
analysis. S.S. assisted with animal study and analysis. K.A. and S.M.A.
performed protein purification and SPR assays. R.Z. and A.F. contributed to
rhesus PCR and antibody production. X.L. assisted with CAP206 Env protein
production. H.-X.L. led protein and antibody production. X.N. and G.K.
performed Protoarrays. K.E.L., C.S., and R.P. performed antibody-binding
assays. L.L.S., R.M.S., and C.M.B. performed rhesus immunizations. L.M. pro-
vided CAP206 Envs and sequences. S.S.A.K. assisted with clinical protocols.
S.B. provided vaccine adjuvant. M.A.M. and D.C.M. performed neutralization
assays. T.B.K. designed software and performed computational analyses of
antibody sequences and inferred unmutated common ancestors. M.A.M. pro-
duced fluorophor-labeled Env proteins for memory B cell staining; S.C.H. led
structural studies and analysis and edited the manuscript; and B.F.H. de-
signed the study, oversaw all experiments, analyzed all data, and wrote and
edited the manuscript.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology-
Immunogen Discovery (CHAVI-ID; UMI-AI100645) grant from NIH/NIAID/
DAIDS. D.F. is supported by a F32 fellowship (1F32AI116355-01) from the
NIH. S.C.H. is an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. We
thank Dawn J. Marshall and John Whitesides for expert technical assistance
with flow cytometry and Kelly Soderberg and Samantha Bowen for project
management. We also thank beam line staff at Advanced Photon Source
24-ID-C and 24-ID-E for support during data collection.
Received: August 6, 2015
Revised: November 20, 2015
Accepted: December 4, 2015
Published: December 24, 2015
REFERENCES
Adams, P.D., Afonine, P.V., Bunko
´czi, G., Chen, V.B., Davis, I.W., Echols, N.,
Headd, J.J., Hung, L.W., Kapral, G.J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W., et al. (2010).
PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular struc-
ture solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221.
Alam, S.M., Liao, H.X., Dennison, S.M., Jaeger, F., Parks, R., Anasti, K.,
Foulger, A., Donathan, M., Lucas, J., Verkoczy, L., et al. (2011). Differential
reactivity of germ line allelic variants of a broadly neutralizing HIV-1 antibody
to a gp41 fusion intermediate conformation. J. Virol. 85, 11725–11731.
Ariyoshi, K., Harwood, E., Chiengsong-Popov, R., and Weber, J. (1992). Is
clearance of HIV-1 viraemia at seroconversion mediated by neutralising anti-
bodies? Lancet 340, 1257–1258.
Bar, K.J., Tsao, C.Y., Iyer, S.S., Decker, J.M., Yang, Y., Bonsignori, M., Chen,
X., Hwang, K.K., Montefiori, D.C., Liao, H.X., et al. (2012). Early low-titer
neutralizing antibodies impede HIV-1 replication and select for virus escape.
PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002721.
Burton, D.R., Poignard, P., Stanfield, R.L., and Wilson, I.A. (2012). Broadly
neutralizing antibodies present new prospects to counter highly antigenically
diverse viruses. Science 337, 183–186.
Davis, I.W., Leaver-Fay, A., Chen, V.B., Block, J.N., Kapral, G.J., Wang, X.,
Murray, L.W., Arendall, W.B., 3rd, Snoeyink, J., Richardson, J.S., and Richa rd-
son, D.C. (2007). MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for
proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W375–W383.
Doria-Rose, N.A., Klein, R.M., Daniels, M.G., O’Dell, S., Nason, M., Lapedes,
A., Bhattacharya, T., Migueles, S.A., Wyatt, R.T., Korber, B.T., et al. (2010).
Breadth of human immunodeficiency virus-specific neutralizing activity in
sera: clustering analysis and association with clinical variables. J. Virol. 84,
1631–1636.
Doria-Rose, N.A., Schramm, C.A., Gorman, J., Moore, P.L., Bhiman, J.N.,
DeKosky, B.J., Ernandes, M.J., Georgiev, I.S., Kim, H.J., Pancera, M., et al.;
NISC Comparative Sequencing Program (2014). Developmental pathway for
potent V1V2-directed HIV-neutralizing antibodies. Nature 509, 55–62.
Emsley, P., and Cowtan, K. (2004). Coot: model-building tools for molecular
graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132.
Fera, D., Schmidt, A.G., Haynes, B.F., Gao, F., Liao, H.X., Kepler, T.B., and
Harrison, S.C. (2014). Affinity maturation in an HIV broadly neutralizing B-cell
lineage through reorientation of variable domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA 111, 10275–10280.
Gao, F., Bonsignori, M., Liao, H.X., Kumar, A., Xia, S.M., Lu, X., Cai, F., Hwang,
K.K., Song, H., Zhou, T., et al. (2014). Cooperation of B cell lineages in induc-
tion of HIV-1-broadly neutralizing antibodies. Cell 158, 481–491.
Gomez, T.S., and Billadeau, D.D. (2009). A FAM21-containing WASH complex
regulates retromer-dependent sorting. Dev. Cell 17, 699–711.
10 Cell Reports 14, 1–12, January 5, 2016 ª2016 The Authors
Please cite this article in press as: Bradley et al., Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2 Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the
Receptor-Binding Site, Cell Reports (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.017
Gray, E.S., Moore, P.L., Choge, I.A., Decker, J.M., Bibollet-Ruche, F., Li, H.,
Leseka, N., Treurnicht, F., Mlisana, K., Shaw, G.M., et al.; CAPRISA 002 Study
Team (2007). Neutralizing antibody responses in acute human immunodefi-
ciency virus type 1 subtype C infection. J. Virol. 81, 6187–6196.
Gray, E.S., Madiga, M.C., Moore, P.L., Mlisana, K., Abdool Karim, S.S., Binley,
J.M., Shaw, G.M., Mascola, J.R., and Morris, L. (2009a). Broad neutralization
of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mediated by plasma antibodies
against the gp41 membrane proximal external region. J. Virol. 83, 11265–
11274.
Gray, E.S., Taylor, N., Wycuff, D., Moore, P.L., Tomaras, G.D., Wibmer, C.K.,
Puren, A., DeCamp, A., Gilbert, P.B., Wood, B., et al. (2009b). Antibody spec-
ificities associated with neutralization breadth in plasma from human immuno-
deficiency virus type 1 subtype C-infected blood donors. J. Virol. 83, 8925–
8937.
Gray, E.S., Madiga, M.C., Hermanus, T., Moore, P.L., Wibmer, C.K., Tumba,
N.L., Werner, L., Mlisana, K., Sibeko, S., Williamson, C., et al.; CAPRISA002
Study Team (2011). The neutralization breadth of HIV-1 develops incrementally
over four years and is associated with CD4+ T cell decline and high viral load
during acute infection. J. Virol. 85, 4828–4840.
Haynes, B.F., and Verkoczy, L. (2014). AIDS/HIV. Host controls of HIV neutral-
izing antibodies. Science 344, 588–589.
Julien, J.P., Cupo, A., Sok, D., Stanfield, R.L., Lyumkis, D., Deller, M.C.,
Klasse, P.J., Burton, D.R., Sanders, R.W., Moore, J.P., et al. (2013). Crystal
structure of a soluble cleaved HIV-1 envelope trimer. Science 342, 1477–1483.
Kabsch, W. (2010). Xds. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132.
Keele, B.F., Giorgi, E.E., Salazar-Gonzalez, J.F., Decker, J.M., Pham, K.T.,
Salazar, M.G., Sun, C., Grayson, T., Wang, S., Li, H., et al. (2008). Identification
and characterization of transmitted and early founder virus envelopes in pri-
mary HIV-1 infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 7552–7557.
Kepler, T.B. (2013). Reconstructing a B-cell clonal lineage. I. Statistical infer-
ence of unobserved ancestors. F1000Res. 2, 103.
Kepler, T.B., Liao, H.X., Alam, S.M., Bhaskarabhatla, R., Zhang, R., Yandava,
C., Stewart, S., Anasti, K., Kelsoe, G., Parks, R., et al. (2014). Immunoglobulin
gene insertions and deletions in the affinity maturation of HIV-1 broadly reac-
tive neutralizing antibodies. Cell Host Microbe 16, 304–313.
Kwong, P.D., and Mascola, J.R. (2012). Human antibodies that neutralize HIV-
1: identification, structures, and B cell ontogenies. Immunity 37, 412–425.
Kwong, P.D., Mascola, J.R., and Nabel, G.J. (2013). Broadly neutralizing anti-
bodies and the search for an HIV-1 vaccine: the end of the beginning. Nat. Rev.
Immunol. 13, 693–701.
Liao, H.X., Levesque, M.C., Nagel, A., Dixon, A., Zhang, R., Walter, E., Parks,
R., Whitesides, J., Marshall, D.J., Hwang, K.K., et al. (2009). High-throughput
isolation of immunoglobulin genes from single human B cells and expression
as monoclonal antibodies. J. Virol. Methods 158, 171–179.
Liao, H.X., Chen, X., Munshaw, S., Zhang, R., Marshall, D.J., Vandergrift, N.,
Whitesides, J.F., Lu, X., Yu, J.S., Hwang, K.K., et al. (2011). Initial antibodies
binding to HIV-1 gp41 in acutely infected subjects are polyreactive and highly
mutated. J. Exp. Med. 208, 2237–2249.
Liao, H.X., Lynch, R., Zhou, T., Gao, F., Alam, S.M., Boyd, S.D., Fire, A.Z., Ros-
kin, K.M., Schramm, C.A., Zhang, Z., et al.; NISC Comparative Sequencing
Program (2013a). Co-evolution of a broadly neutralizing HIV-1 antibody and
founder virus. Nature 496, 469–476.
Liao, H.X., Tsao, C.Y., Alam, S.M., Muldoon, M., Vandergrift, N., Ma, B.J., Lu,
X., Sutherland, L.L., Scearce, R.M., Bowman, C., et al. (2013b). Antigenicity
and immunogenicity of transmitted/founder, consensus, and chronic envelope
glycoproteins of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 87, 4185–
4201.
Liu, J., Bartesaghi, A., Borgnia, M.J., Sapiro, G., and Subramaniam, S. (2008).
Molecular architecture of native HIV-1 gp120 trimers. Nature 455, 109–113.
Mascola, J.R., and Haynes, B.F. (2013). HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies: under-
standing nature’s pathways. Immunol. Rev. 254, 225–244.
McCoy, A.J. (2007). Solving structures of protein complexes by molecular
replacement with Phaser. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 63, 32–41.
McGuire, A.T., Hoot, S., Dreyer, A.M., Lippy, A., Stuart, A., Cohen, K.W., Jar-
dine, J., Menis, S., Scheid, J.F., West, A.P., et al. (2013). Engineering HIV
envelope protein to activate germline B cell receptors of broadly neutralizing
anti-CD4 binding site antibodies. J. Exp. Med. 210, 655–663.
Morris, L., Chen, X., Alam, M., Tomaras, G., Zhang, R., Marshall, D.J., Chen,
B., Parks, R., Foulger, A., Jaeger, F., et al. (2011). Isolation of a human anti-
HIV gp41 membrane proximal region neutralizing antibody by ant igen-specific
single B cell sorting. PLoS ONE 6, e23532.
Munshaw, S., and Kepler, T.B. (2010). SoDA2: a Hidden Markov Model
approach for identification of immunoglobulin rearrangements. Bioinformatics
26, 867–872.
Otwinowski, Z., and Minor, W. (1997). Processing of X-ray diffraction data
collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326.
Pugach, P., Ozorowski, G., Cupo, A., Ringe, R., Yasmeen, A., de Val, N., Derk-
ing, R., Kim, H.J., Korzun, J., Golabek, M., et al. (2015). A native-like
SOSIP.664 trimer based on an HIV-1 subtype B env gene. J. Virol. 89, 3380–
3395.
Richman, D.D., Wrin, T., Little, S.J., and Petropoulos, C.J. (2003). Rapid evo-
lution of the neutralizing antibody response to HIV type 1 infection. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4144–4149.
Sanders, R.W., van Gils, M.J., Derking, R., Sok, D., Ketas, T.J., Burger, J.A.,
Ozorowski, G., Cupo, A., Simonich, C., Goo, L., et al. (2015). HIV-1 VACCINES.
HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies induced by native-like envelope trimers. Science
349, aac4223.
Sarzotti-Kelsoe, M., Bailer, R.T., Turk, E., Lin, C.L., Bilska, M., Greene, K.M.,
Gao, H., Todd, C.A., Ozaki, D.A., Seaman, M.S., et al. (2014). Optimization
and validation of the TZM-bl assay for standardized assessments of neutral-
izing antibodies against HIV-1. J. Immunol. Methods 409, 131–146.
Scheid, J.F., Mouquet, H., Feldhahn, N., Seaman, M.S., Velinzon, K., Pietzsch,
J., Ott, R.G., Anthony, R.M., Zebroski, H., Hurley, A., et al. (2009). Broad diver-
sity of neutralizing antibodies isolated from memory B cells in HIV-infected in-
dividuals. Nature 458, 636–640.
Scheid, J.F., Mouquet, H., Ueberheide, B., Diskin, R., Klein, F., Oliveira, T.Y.,
Pietzsch, J., Fenyo, D., Abadir, A., Velinzon, K., et al. (2011). Sequence and
structural convergence of broad and potent HIV antibodies that mimic CD4
binding. Science 333, 1633–1637.
Seaman, M.S., Janes, H., Hawkins, N., Grandpre, L.E., Devoy, C., Giri, A., Cof-
fey, R.T., Harris, L., Wood, B., Daniels, M.G., et al. (2010). Tiered categorization
of a diverse panel of HIV-1 Env pseudoviruses for assessment of neutralizing
antibodies. J. Virol. 84, 1439–1452.
Tomaras, G.D., Binley, J.M., Gray, E.S., Crooks, E.T., Osawa, K., Moore, P.L.,
Tumba, N., Tong, T., Shen, X., Yates, N.L., et al. (2011). Polyclonal B cell re-
sponses to conserved neutralization epitopes in a subset of HIV-1-infected in-
dividuals. J. Virol. 85, 11502–11519.
Walker, L.M., Huber, M., Doores, K.J., Falkowska, E., Pejchal, R., Julien, J.P.,
Wang, S.K., Ramos, A., Chan-Hui, P.Y., Moyle, M., et al.; Protocol G Principal
Investigators (2011). Broad neutralization coverage of HIV by multiple highly
potent antibodies. Nature 477, 466–470.
Wei, X., Decker, J.M., Wang, S., Hui, H., Kappes, J.C., Wu, X., Salazar-Gonza-
lez, J.F., Salazar, M.G., Kilby, J.M., Saag, M.S., et al. (2003). Antibody neutral-
ization and escape by HIV-1. Nature 422, 307–312.
Wibmer, C.K., Bhiman, J.N., Gray, E.S., Tumba, N., Abdool Karim, S.S., Wil-
liamson, C., Morris, L., and Moore, P.L. (2013). Viral escape from HIV-1
neutralizing antibodies drives increased plasma neutralization breadth through
sequential recognition of multiple epitopes and immunotypes. PLoS Pathog. 9,
e1003738.
Wiehe, K., Easterhoff, D., Luo, K., Nicely, N.I., Bradley, T., Jaeger, F.H., Den-
nison, S.M., Zhang, R., Lloyd, K.E., Stolarchuk, C., et al. (2014). Antibody light-
chain-restricted recognition of the site of immune pressure in the RV144 HIV-1
vaccine trial is phylogenetically conserved. Immunity 41, 909–918.
Willey, R.L., Byrum, R., Piatak, M., Kim, Y.B., Cho, M.W., Rossio, J.L., Jr.,
Bess, J., Jr., Igarashi, T., Endo, Y., Arthur, L.O., et al. (2003). Control of viremia
and prevention of simian-human immunodeficiency virus-induced disease in
Cell Reports 14, 1–12, January 5, 2016 ª2016 The Authors 11
Please cite this article in press as: Bradley et al., Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2 Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the
Receptor-Binding Site, Cell Reports (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.017
rhesus macaques immunized with recombinant vaccinia viruses plus inacti-
vated simian immunodeficiency virus and human immunodeficiency virus
type 1 particles. J. Virol. 77, 1163–1174.
Winn, M.D., Ballard, C.C., Cowtan, K.D., Dodson, E.J., Emsley, P., Evans,
P.R., Keegan, R.M., Krissinel, E.B., Leslie, A.G., McCoy, A., et al. (2011). Over-
view of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol.
Crystallogr. 67, 235–242.
Wyatt, R., and Sodroski, J. (1998). The HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins: fuso-
gens, antigens, and immunogens. Science 280, 1884–1888.
Yang, G., Holl, T.M., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Lu, X., Nicely, N.I., Kepler, T.B., Alam, S.M.,
Liao, H.X., Cain, D.W., et al. (2013). Identification of autoantigens recognized
by the 2F5 and 4E10 broadly neutralizing HIV-1 antibodies. J. Exp. Med.
210, 241–256.
Zhou, T., Xu, L., Dey, B., Hessell, A.J., Van Ryk, D., Xiang, S.H., Yang, X.,
Zhang, M.Y., Zwick, M.B., Arthos, J., et al. (2007). Structural definition of a
conserved neutralization epitope on HIV-1 gp120. Nature 445, 732–737.
Zhou, T., Georgiev, I., Wu, X., Yang, Z.Y., Dai, K., Finzi, A., Kwon, Y.D., Scheid,
J.F., Shi, W., Xu, L., et al. (2010). Structural basis for broad and potent neutral-
ization of HIV-1 by antibody VRC01. Science 329, 811–817.
12 Cell Reports 14, 1–12, January 5, 2016 ª2016 The Authors
Please cite this article in press as: Bradley et al., Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2 Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the
Receptor-Binding Site, Cell Reports (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.017
Cell Reports
Supplemental Information
Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2
Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting
the Receptor-Binding Site
Todd Bradley, Daniela Fera, Jinal Bhiman, Leila Eslamizar, Xiaozhi Lu, Kara Anasti,
Ruijung Zhang, Laura L. Sutherland, Richard M. Scearce, Cindy M. Bowman, Christina
Stolarchuk, Krissey E. Lloyd, Robert Parks, Amanda Eaton, Andrew Foulger, Xiaoyan
Nie, Salim S. Abdool Karim, Susan Barnett, Garnett Kelsoe, Thomas B. Kepler, S. Munir
Alam, David C. Montefiori, M. Anthony Moody, Hua-Xin Liao, Lynn Morris, Sampa
Santra, Stephen C. Harrison, and Barton F. Haynes
Trimer
CAP206 gp140
T/F
2mo
6mo
12mo
21mo
24mo
30mo
250
150
100
75
50
37
25
20
15
10
KDa
CAP206 gp140
T/F
2mo
6mo
12mo
21mo
24mo
30mo
Blue Native Page SDS-Page; Reducing
A
B
Dimer
Monomer
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
-50 0 50 100150200250
RU
sTime
A32
T8
sCD4
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
-50 0 50 100150200250
RU
sTime
A32
T8
sCD4
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
-50 0 50 100150200250
RU
sTime
A32
T8
sCD4
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
-50 0 50 100150200250
RU
sTim e
A32
T8
sCD4
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
-50 0 50 10015020 025 0
RU
sTime
A32
T8
sCD4
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
-50 0 50 100150200250
RU
sTime
A32
T8
sCD4
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
-50 0 50 100150200250
RU
sTime
A32
T8
sCD4
CAP206 T/F gp140 CAP206 2month gp140 CAP206 6month gp140
CAP206 12month gp140 CAP206 21month gp140 CAP206 24month gp140
CAP206 30month gp140
CAP206
A32 T8 sCD4
Figure S1. Expression and Purification of CAP206 Env gp140 Proteins, Related to Figure 1.(A) Blue-native PAGE and SDS-
PAGE of the 7 CAP206 Envs used as immunogens. (B) Binding of sCD4, A32 and control mAb T8 to each of the CAP206 Envs by
SPR.
Figure S2. CAP206 Envs can Bind bnAbs Isolated from Infected Individuals, Related to Figure 1. Binding of bnAbs to the 7
CAP206 gp140 immunogens by ELISA (Dark blue, V1/V2; Aqua,V3-glycan; Red,CD4bs; Orange, Other; Green, gp41).
CAP206 T/F gp140
Log AUC
C
H58
C
H
59
C
H
01
P
G
9
2G1
2
P
G
T
1
2
5
P
GT
12
8
CH31
B1
2
C
H
1
06
V
R
C01
A3
2
17
B
s
C
D4/
17
B
7
B2
2F
5
4E
1
0
0
5
10
15
CAP206 2 month gp140
Log AUC
CH5
8
CH
5
9
C
H
0
1
PG9
2
G12
PGT
12
5
PGT128
C
H3
1
B
12
CH1
0
6
VR
C
0
1
A
3
2
17
B
s
C
D4/17
B
7B2
2
F5
4E
10
0
5
10
15
CAP206 6 month gp140
Log AUC
CH5
8
C
H59
CH01
PG
9
2
G
12
PGT125
P
G
T12
8
CH3
1
B
1
2
C
H
1
06
VRC01
A
3
2
17
B
sCD4
/
1
7B
7B
2
2F5
4E10
0
5
10
15
CAP206 12 month gp140
Log AUC
CH
5
8
C
H5
9
CH01
P
G
9
2
G
1
2
PGT12
5
P
GT1
28
CH3
1
B
1
2
CH1
0
6
V
R
C0
1
A
3
2
1
7B
sCD
4
/
1
7
B
7
B
2
2F5
4
E1
0
0
5
10
15
CAP206 21 month gp140
Log AUC
CH
5
8
C
H
5
9
C
H01
PG
9
2G
12
PG
T1
25
PGT128
C
H31
B
1
2
C
H106
V
RC01
A
3
2
1
7
B
s
C
D4
/
1
7
B
7B2
2
F
5
4
E10
0
5
10
15
CAP206 24 month gp140
Log AUC
CH58
CH59
C
H
0
1
P
G
9
2G
12
P
G
T125
P
G
T
12
8
CH3
1
B
1
2
CH
10
6
V
RC
0
1
A3
2
1
7
B
sCD
4/
17
B
7
B
2
2
F5
4
E
1
0
0
5
10
15
CH
5
8
C
H59
C
H
01
P
G
9
2
G
1
2
PGT12
5
P
G
T128
CH31
B1
2
C
H1
0
6
V
R
C
01
A
3
2
17B
sC
D4
/
1
7B
7
B2
2F5
4E1
0
0
5
10
15
Log AUC
CAP20630 month gp140
A
Figure S3. Plasma Neutralization of CAP206 Env-immunized Animals, Related to Figure 1. (A) Tier phenotype of CAP206 env
pseudotyped viruses. CAP206 autologous viruses were tested for neutralization by a characterized panel of sera from clade C HIV
infected individuals in the TZM-bl neutralization assay.(B)Plasma neutralization of heterologous tier-1 (B.MN, C.MW965) and
autologous tier-2 (CAP206 T/F, 2mo, 6mo, 12mo, 21mo,24mo, 30mo) before immunization (week 0) and 2 weeks after the last
immunization (week 38) measured as the plasma dilution at which relative luminescence units (RLUs) were reduced 50% compared to
control wells in the TZM-bl neutralization assay(Yellow, ID50 > 20 Orange, ID50 > 200; Red, ID50>1000).
Figure S4. Amino Acid Alignment of DH427 Antibody Lineage, Related to Figure 3.
DH427_UCA EVQLVESGGG LVQPGGSLRL SCAASGFTFS SYGMSWVRQA PGKGLEWVSY ISNGGGSTYY ADSVKGRFTI SRDNSKNTLS LQMNSLRAED TAVYYCAKEG WAYFDYWGQG VLVTVSS
DH427_UCA2 .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......
DH427_I1 .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... ..IS...... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......
DH427 .......... .......... .......... NS..I..... .......... ..LS.AN... .......... .....Q.... .......V.. ..M....... .S...F.... .......
DH428 .......... .......... .......... T......... .......... ..IS...... T......... .......... ..I....P.. .......... .......... .......
DH427_UCA QAALTQPPSV SKSLGQSVTI SCTGTSNDVG GYNDVSWYQQ HPGTAPRLLI YDVSKRPSGV SDRFSGSKSG NTASLTISGL QAEDEADYYC CSYRSGSTYI FGAGTRLTVL
DH427_UCA2 .S........ .......... ......S.I. ...G...... .S........ .E........ .......... .......... .......... G......... ..........
DH427_I1 .S........ .......... ......S.I. D..G...... .S........ .......... .......... .......... .......... ....T.G... ..T.......
DH427 .S........ .......... ......S.I. A.TG...... .S........ .......... .......... .......... .TD....... ....T.A... ..T...V...
DH428 .S........ .......... .....NS.I. D..G...... .S........ .......... .......... .......... .......... ....T.G... ..T.......
CDR1 CDR2 CDR3
Heavy
Light CDR1 CDR2 CDR3
Virus
DH427
DH428
CAP206 T/F
>50
>50
CAP206 2mo
>50
>50
CAP206 6mo
0.02
0.02
CAP206 12mo
>50
>50
CAP206 21mo
>50
>50
CAP206 24mo
>50
>50
CAP206 30mo
>50
>50
B.MN
>50
>50
C.MW965
>50
>50
C.1086
>50
>50
TV1
>50
>50
Q842
>50
>50
Q23
>50
>50
Du172
>50
>50
Du422
>50
>50
Figure S5. DH427 and DH428 Neutralization of Autologous and Heterologous Viruses in the TZM-bl Assay, Related to Figure
4. Values are IC50 of neutralization.
Figure S6. Binding of DH427, DH428 and the Intermediate (I1) and Unmutated Common Ancestor (UCA) to the CAP206
Immunogens by SPR, Related to Figure 5.
CM5 Sensor Chip
Anti-human IgG Fc Antibody
Capture mAbs:
DH427_UCA, DH427_I1, DH427, DH428
CAP206 Envs
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
-50 0 50 100150200250300350400450500
s
DH427_UCA
DH427_I1
DH427
DH428
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
-50 0 50 100150200250300350400450500
s
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
-50 0 50 100150200250300350400450500
s
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
-50 0 50 100150200250300350400450500
s
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
-50 0 50 100150200250300350400450500
s-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
-50 0 50 100150200250300350400450500
s
Binding response (RU)
CAP206 Env gp140 proteins
T/F 2 month
12 month 21 month
24 month 30 month
Time
A
L1 L2 VL2-F V-RS
C
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
....|....| ....|....| ....|....| ....|....| ....|....| ....|....| ....|....|....|....| ....|....| ....|...
IGVL2-F*01QAALTQPPSVSKSLGQSVTISCTGTSNDVGGYNDVSWYQQHPGTAPRLLIYDVSKRPSGVSDRFSGSKSGNTASLTISGLQAEDEADYYCCSYRSGST
5173_1.S....A............................................E............FV....................I...S.......
5173_2.S........................S.I.....................................................................
5173_2.S........................S.I.....................................................................
5173_1.S........................S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5173_2.S........................S.I. ...G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5173_1.S........................S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5173_1.S........................S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5173_1.......R...G.P............S.I....Y............K.M..A.........................................AGSY.
5173_1.......R...G.P............S.I....Y............K.M..A.........................................AGSY.
5173_1.......R...G.P............S.I....Y............K.M..A.........................................AGSY.
5173_1...........G.P............S.I....R.........K..K.M..E......................................S..AGSD.
5160_1 .S....A............................................E............FV....................I...S.......
5160_1 .S........................S.I....G.......S........ .E.........................F............G.......
5160_1 .S........................S.I....G.......S.........E..N....................I..............S..A.S..
5160_2 .S........................S.I....G.......S........................................................
5160_1 ......S....G.P............S.I....R.........K..K.M..E..N....................I..............S..A.S..
5160_1.......R...G.P............S.I....Y............K.M..A.........................................AGSY.
5165_1 ..........................S.I............A........................................................
5165_2 .S........................S.I....G.......S.........E.........................................TTS..
5165_1 .........M.G.P............S.I....R.........K..K.M..E......................................S..AGSN.
5167_2 .S....A............................................E............FV....................I...S.......
5167_1 .S....A............................................E............FV........................S..AGSD.
5167_1 ......................A...S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5167_2 .S........................S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5167_1 .T....................A...SGIAS.S.................HR..N...........F...S...............I...........
5183_1 .S........................S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5183_2 .S........................S.I....G.......S...................................... ..........S..AGSN.
5183_1 .S.P.......G.P............S.I.Y..A............K.M..G..N...........................................
5183_1 ...........G.P............S.I....Y.........K..K.M.........................................S..AGSN.
5183_1 .......R...G.P............S.I....Y............K.M..E.........................................AGSY.
5183_1 ...........G.P............S.I....Y.........K..K.M.........................................S..AGSN.
5184_2 ..........................S.I............A........................................................
5184_1 .........M.G..............S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5184_1 .S........................S.I....G.......S.........E..............................................
5184_2 .S........................S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5184_1 ......S....G.P............S.I....R.........K..K.M..E......................................S..A.S..
5184_1 .......R...G.P............S.I....Y............K.M..E.........................................AGSY.
5184_1 .........M.G.P............S.I....R.........K..K.M..E......................................S..AGSN.
Log AUC
0
5
10
15
20
DH427 I1 I29V D31G G34D S42PS27N
CAP206 6 month Env B
Animal
Week
SSA
SSB
Sm
RNP
Scl 70
Jo 1
dsDNA
Cent B
Histone
5160
0
3
9
6
5
5
4
18
9
7
5165
0
5
6
12
16
28
8
51
14
19
5167
0
3
4
6
11
8
8
27
5
9
5173
0
9
18
5
25
24
13
33
7
12
5183
0
3
6
10
20
7
5
45
12
15
5184
0
8
6
8
7
46
10
33
10
12
5160
38
3
4
7
11
4
10
28
7
10
5165
38
5
7
6
20
12
6
37
9
12
5167
38
2
7
5
6
13
4
15
3
4
5173
38
7
10
8
48
20
22
28
12
13
5183
38
7
9
7
7
8
6
47
5
11
5184
38
5
7
8
5
20
10
24
3
6
4E10
50µg/ml
122
190
10
13
5
186
5
7
18
Synagis
50µg/ml
4
6
4
2
2
6
2
2
2
D
Antibody
(50µg/m l)
SSA
SSB
Sm
RNP
Scl 70
Jo 1
dsDNA
Cent B
Histone
DH427
UCA2
7
18
4
4
5
13
14
47
15
DH427 I1
3
4
2
2
2
3
12
2
4
DH427
3
3
3
2
2
2
8
3
2
DH428
4
5
3
5
4
4
19
7
7
4E10
100
192
5
31
11
210
0
19
29
Synagis
5
10
3
2
3
8
8
10
5
E
Figure S7. Sequencing Genomic DNA to Identify Genomic VL Protein Sequences, Related to Figure 5 (A) Binding of DH427 I1
and DH427 I1 with light chain mutations to the CAP206 6 month Env measured by ELISA. (B) the primer design for determination of
IGVL2-F sequences are shown with leader sequences (blue), coding sequence (red), V recombination site (V-RS; green) and
noncoding genomic regions (black). 2 primer sets were used to ensure amplification of unrearranged germ-line DNA (green and red
arrows). (C) Amino acid sequence alignments of germ-line IGVL2-F alleles from all 6 CAP206 animals compared with the annotated
IGVL20F allele. 1 indicates sequences amplified with primer set 1 (green) and 2 indicated sequences amplified with primer set 2 (red).
Red box highlights residue critical for DH427 binding to the CAP206 Env. (D-E) Plasma (D) and DH427 antibody lineage (E)
screened for reactivity with auto-antigens in the AtheNA ANA assay. Values greater than 100 considered positive (orange), and 4E10
(auto-reactive HIV mAb) and Synagis (RSV-specific mAb) used as positive and negative control, respectively.
Table S1. DH427UCA2 Reactive Host Proteins, Related to Figure 5.
Description
DH427UCA2 MFI
Control MFI
family with sequence similarity 21, member C (FAM21C)
6195
-6
family with sequence similarity 21, member C (FAM21C)
6490
-6
G-protein signaling modulator 3 (AGS3-like, C. elegans)
(GPSM3)
3085
5
G-protein signaling modulator 3 (AGS3-like, C. elegans)
(GPSM3)
2824
44
SNAP25-interacting protein (SNIP)
1057
27
SNAP25-interacting protein (SNIP)
1645
3
nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial protein(ATP5H)
1230
4
nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial protein (ATP5H)
1203
18
WD repeat domain 45 (WDR45), transcript variant 1
452
1
WD repeat domain 45 (WDR45), transcript variant 1
584
16
regulator of G-protein signaling 8 (RGS8), transcript variant 1
2709
87
regulator of G-protein signaling 8 (RGS8), transcript variant 1
2961
90
lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA)
1086
29
lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA)
868
10
Microtubule-associated serine/threonine-protein kinase-like
323
89
Microtubule-associated serine/threonine-protein kinase-like
9011
126
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Bradley et al. “Structural Constraints of Vaccine-Induced Tier-2 Autologous HIV Neutralizing Antibodies Targeting the
Receptor Binding Site.” (2015)
Trimer
CAP206 gp140
T/F
2mo
6mo
12mo
21mo
24mo
30mo
250
150
100
75
50
37
25
20
15
10
KDa
CAP206 gp140
T/F
2mo
6mo
12mo
21mo
24mo
30mo
Blue Native Page SDS-Page; Reducing
A
B
Dimer
Monomer
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
-50 0 50 100150200250
RU
sTime
A32
T8
sCD4
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
-50 0 50 100150200250
RU
sTime
A32
T8
sCD4
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
-50 0 50 100150200250
RU
sTime
A32
T8
sCD4
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
-50 0 50 100150200250
RU
sTim e
A32
T8
sCD4
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
-50 0 50 10015020 025 0
RU
sTime
A32
T8
sCD4
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
-50 0 50 100150200250
RU
sTime
A32
T8
sCD4
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
-50 0 50 100150200250
RU
sTime
A32
T8
sCD4
CAP206 T/F gp140 CAP206 2month gp140 CAP206 6month gp140
CAP206 12month gp140 CAP206 21month gp140 CAP206 24month gp140
CAP206 30month gp140
CAP206
A32 T8 sCD4
Figure S1. Expression and Purification of CAP206 Env gp140 Proteins, Related to Figure 1.(A) Blue-native PAGE and SDS-
PAGE of the 7 CAP206 Envs used as immunogens. (B) Binding of sCD4, A32 and control mAb T8 to each of the CAP206 Envs by
SPR.
Figure S2. CAP206 Envs can Bind bnAbs Isolated from Infected Individuals, Related to Figure 1. Binding of bnAbs to the 7
CAP206 gp140 immunogens by ELISA (Dark blue, V1/V2; Aqua,V3-glycan; Red,CD4bs; Orange, Other; Green, gp41).
CAP206 T/F gp140
Log AUC
C
H58
C
H
59
C
H
01
P
G
9
2G1
2
P
G
T
1
2
5
P
GT
12
8
CH31
B1
2
C
H
1
06
V
R
C01
A3
2
17
B
s
C
D4/
17
B
7
B2
2F
5
4E
1
0
0
5
10
15
CAP206 2 month gp140
Log AUC
CH5
8
CH
5
9
C
H
0
1
PG9
2
G12
PGT
12
5
PGT128
C
H3
1
B
12
CH1
0
6
VR
C
0
1
A
3
2
17
B
s
C
D4/17
B
7B2
2
F5
4E
10
0
5
10
15
CAP206 6 month gp140
Log AUC
CH5
8
C
H59
CH01
PG
9
2
G
12
PGT125
P
G
T12
8
CH3
1
B
1
2
C
H
1
06
VRC01
A
3
2
17
B
sCD4
/
1
7B
7B
2
2F5
4E10
0
5
10
15
CAP206 12 month gp140
Log AUC
CH
5
8
C
H5
9
CH01
P
G
9
2
G
1
2
PGT12
5
P
GT1
28
CH3
1
B
1
2
CH1
0
6
V
R
C0
1
A
3
2
1
7B
sCD
4
/
1
7
B
7
B
2
2F5
4
E1
0
0
5
10
15
CAP206 21 month gp140
Log AUC
CH
5
8
C
H
5
9
C
H01
PG
9
2G
12
PG
T1
25
PGT128
C
H31
B
1
2
C
H106
V
RC01
A
3
2
1
7
B
s
C
D4
/
1
7
B
7B2
2
F
5
4
E10
0
5
10
15
CAP206 24 month gp140
Log AUC
CH58
CH59
C
H
0
1
P
G
9
2G
12
P
G
T125
P
G
T
12
8
CH3
1
B
1
2
CH
10
6
V
RC
0
1
A3
2
1
7
B
sCD
4/
17
B
7
B
2
2
F5
4
E
1
0
0
5
10
15
CH
5
8
C
H59
C
H
01
P
G
9
2
G
1
2
PGT12
5
P
G
T128
CH31
B1
2
C
H1
0
6
V
R
C
01
A
3
2
17B
sC
D4
/
1
7B
7
B2
2F5
4E1
0
0
5
10
15
Log AUC
CAP20630 month gp140
A
Figure S3. Plasma Neutralization of CAP206 Env-immunized Animals, Related to Figure 1. (A) Tier phenotype of CAP206 env
pseudotyped viruses. CAP206 autologous viruses were tested for neutralization by a characterized panel of sera from clade C HIV
infected individuals in the TZM-bl neutralization assay.(B)Plasma neutralization of heterologous tier-1 (B.MN, C.MW965) and
autologous tier-2 (CAP206 T/F, 2mo, 6mo, 12mo, 21mo,24mo, 30mo) before immunization (week 0) and 2 weeks after the last
immunization (week 38) measured as the plasma dilution at which relative luminescence units (RLUs) were reduced 50% compared to
control wells in the TZM-bl neutralization assay(Yellow, ID50 > 20 Orange, ID50 > 200; Red, ID50>1000).
Figure S4. Amino Acid Alignment of DH427 Antibody Lineage, Related to Figure 3.
DH427_UCA EVQLVESGGG LVQPGGSLRL SCAASGFTFS SYGMSWVRQA PGKGLEWVSY ISNGGGSTYY ADSVKGRFTI SRDNSKNTLS LQMNSLRAED TAVYYCAKEG WAYFDYWGQG VLVTVSS
DH427_UCA2 .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......
DH427_I1 .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... ..IS...... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......
DH427 .......... .......... .......... NS..I..... .......... ..LS.AN... .......... .....Q.... .......V.. ..M....... .S...F.... .......
DH428 .......... .......... .......... T......... .......... ..IS...... T......... .......... ..I....P.. .......... .......... .......
DH427_UCA QAALTQPPSV SKSLGQSVTI SCTGTSNDVG GYNDVSWYQQ HPGTAPRLLI YDVSKRPSGV SDRFSGSKSG NTASLTISGL QAEDEADYYC CSYRSGSTYI FGAGTRLTVL
DH427_UCA2 .S........ .......... ......S.I. ...G...... .S........ .E........ .......... .......... .......... G......... ..........
DH427_I1 .S........ .......... ......S.I. D..G...... .S........ .......... .......... .......... .......... ....T.G... ..T.......
DH427 .S........ .......... ......S.I. A.TG...... .S........ .......... .......... .......... .TD....... ....T.A... ..T...V...
DH428 .S........ .......... .....NS.I. D..G...... .S........ .......... .......... .......... .......... ....T.G... ..T.......
CDR1 CDR2 CDR3
Heavy
Light CDR1 CDR2 CDR3
Virus
DH427
DH428
CAP206 T/F
>50
>50
CAP206 2mo
>50
>50
CAP206 6mo
0.02
0.02
CAP206 12mo
>50
>50
CAP206 21mo
>50
>50
CAP206 24mo
>50
>50
CAP206 30mo
>50
>50
B.MN
>50
>50
C.MW965
>50
>50
C.1086
>50
>50
TV1
>50
>50
Q842
>50
>50
Q23
>50
>50
Du172
>50
>50
Du422
>50
>50
Figure S5. DH427 and DH428 Neutralization of Autologous and Heterologous Viruses in the TZM-bl Assay, Related to Figure
4. Values are IC50 of neutralization.
Figure S6. Binding of DH427, DH428 and the Intermediate (I1) and Unmutated Common Ancestor (UCA) to the CAP206
Immunogens by SPR, Related to Figure 5.
CM5 Sensor Chip
Anti-human IgG Fc Antibody
Capture mAbs:
DH427_UCA, DH427_I1, DH427, DH428
CAP206 Envs
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
-50 0 50 100150200250300350400450500
s
DH427_UCA
DH427_I1
DH427
DH428
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
-50 0 50 100150200250300350400450500
s
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
-50 0 50 100150200250300350400450500
s
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
-50 0 50 100150200250300350400450500
s
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
-50 0 50 100150200250300350400450500
s-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
-50 0 50 100150200250300350400450500
s
Binding response (RU)
CAP206 Env gp140 proteins
T/F 2 month
12 month 21 month
24 month 30 month
Time
A
L1 L2 VL2-F V-RS
C
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
....|....| ....|....| ....|....| ....|....| ....|....| ....|....| ....|....|....|....| ....|....| ....|...
IGVL2-F*01QAALTQPPSVSKSLGQSVTISCTGTSNDVGGYNDVSWYQQHPGTAPRLLIYDVSKRPSGVSDRFSGSKSGNTASLTISGLQAEDEADYYCCSYRSGST
5173_1.S....A............................................E............FV....................I...S.......
5173_2.S........................S.I.....................................................................
5173_2.S........................S.I.....................................................................
5173_1.S........................S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5173_2.S........................S.I. ...G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5173_1.S........................S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5173_1.S........................S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5173_1.......R...G.P............S.I....Y............K.M..A.........................................AGSY.
5173_1.......R...G.P............S.I....Y............K.M..A.........................................AGSY.
5173_1.......R...G.P............S.I....Y............K.M..A.........................................AGSY.
5173_1...........G.P............S.I....R.........K..K.M..E......................................S..AGSD.
5160_1 .S....A............................................E............FV....................I...S.......
5160_1 .S........................S.I....G.......S........ .E.........................F............G.......
5160_1 .S........................S.I....G.......S.........E..N....................I..............S..A.S..
5160_2 .S........................S.I....G.......S........................................................
5160_1 ......S....G.P............S.I....R.........K..K.M..E..N....................I..............S..A.S..
5160_1.......R...G.P............S.I....Y............K.M..A.........................................AGSY.
5165_1 ..........................S.I............A........................................................
5165_2 .S........................S.I....G.......S.........E.........................................TTS..
5165_1 .........M.G.P............S.I....R.........K..K.M..E......................................S..AGSN.
5167_2 .S....A............................................E............FV....................I...S.......
5167_1 .S....A............................................E............FV........................S..AGSD.
5167_1 ......................A...S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5167_2 .S........................S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5167_1 .T....................A...SGIAS.S.................HR..N...........F...S...............I...........
5183_1 .S........................S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5183_2 .S........................S.I....G.......S...................................... ..........S..AGSN.
5183_1 .S.P.......G.P............S.I.Y..A............K.M..G..N...........................................
5183_1 ...........G.P............S.I....Y.........K..K.M.........................................S..AGSN.
5183_1 .......R...G.P............S.I....Y............K.M..E.........................................AGSY.
5183_1 ...........G.P............S.I....Y.........K..K.M.........................................S..AGSN.
5184_2 ..........................S.I............A........................................................
5184_1 .........M.G..............S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5184_1 .S........................S.I....G.......S.........E..............................................
5184_2 .S........................S.I....G.......S.........E......................................G.......
5184_1 ......S....G.P............S.I....R.........K..K.M..E......................................S..A.S..
5184_1 .......R...G.P............S.I....Y............K.M..E.........................................AGSY.
5184_1 .........M.G.P............S.I....R.........K..K.M..E......................................S..AGSN.
Log AUC
0
5
10
15
20
DH427 I1 I29V D31G G34D S42PS27N
CAP206 6 month Env B
Animal
Week
SSA
SSB
Sm
RNP
Scl 70
Jo 1
dsDNA
Cent B
Histone
5160
0
3
9
6
5
5
4
18
9
7
5165
0
5
6
12
16
28
8
51
14
19
5167
0
3
4
6
11
8
8
27
5
9
5173
0
9
18
5
25
24
13
33
7
12
5183
0
3
6
10
20
7
5
45
12
15
5184
0
8
6
8
7
46
10
33
10
12
5160
38
3
4
7
11
4
10
28
7
10
5165
38
5
7
6
20
12
6
37
9
12
5167
38
2
7
5
6
13
4
15
3
4
5173
38
7
10
8
48
20
22
28
12
13
5183
38
7
9
7
7
8
6
47
5
11
5184
38
5
7
8
5
20
10
24
3
6
4E10
50µg/ml
122
190
10
13
5
186
5
7
18
Synagis
50µg/ml
4
6
4
2
2
6
2
2
2
D
Antibody
(50µg/m l)
SSA
SSB
Sm
RNP
Scl 70
Jo 1
dsDNA
Cent B
Histone
DH427
UCA2
7
18
4
4
5
13
14
47
15
DH427 I1
3
4
2
2
2
3
12
2
4
DH427
3
3
3
2
2
2
8
3
2
DH428
4
5
3
5
4
4
19
7
7
4E10
100
192
5
31
11
210
0
19
29
Synagis
5
10
3
2
3
8
8
10
5
E
Figure S7. Sequencing Genomic DNA to Identify Genomic VL Protein Sequences, Related to Figure 5 (A) Binding of DH427 I1
and DH427 I1 with light chain mutations to the CAP206 6 month Env measured by ELISA. (B) the primer design for determination of
IGVL2-F sequences are shown with leader sequences (blue), coding sequence (red), V recombination site (V-RS; green) and
noncoding genomic regions (black). 2 primer sets were used to ensure amplification of unrearranged germ-line DNA (green and red
arrows). (C) Amino acid sequence alignments of germ-line IGVL2-F alleles from all 6 CAP206 animals compared with the annotated
IGVL20F allele. 1 indicates sequences amplified with primer set 1 (green) and 2 indicated sequences amplified with primer set 2 (red).
Red box highlights residue critical for DH427 binding to the CAP206 Env. (D-E) Plasma (D) and DH427 antibody lineage (E)
screened for reactivity with auto-antigens in the AtheNA ANA assay. Values greater than 100 considered positive (orange), and 4E10
(auto-reactive HIV mAb) and Synagis (RSV-specific mAb) used as positive and negative control, respectively.
Table S1. DH427UCA2 Reactive Host Proteins, Related to Figure 5.
Description
DH427UCA2 MFI
Control MFI
family with sequence similarity 21, member C (FAM21C)
6195
-6
family with sequence similarity 21, member C (FAM21C)
6490
-6
G-protein signaling modulator 3 (AGS3-like, C. elegans)
(GPSM3)
3085
5
G-protein signaling modulator 3 (AGS3-like, C. elegans)
(GPSM3)
2824
44
SNAP25-interacting protein (SNIP)
1057
27
SNAP25-interacting protein (SNIP)
1645
3
nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial protein(ATP5H)
1230
4
nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial protein (ATP5H)
1203
18
WD repeat domain 45 (WDR45), transcript variant 1
452
1
WD repeat domain 45 (WDR45), transcript variant 1
584
16
regulator of G-protein signaling 8 (RGS8), transcript variant 1
2709
87
regulator of G-protein signaling 8 (RGS8), transcript variant 1
2961
90
lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA)
1086
29
lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA)
868
10
Microtubule-associated serine/threonine-protein kinase-like
323
89
Microtubule-associated serine/threonine-protein kinase-like
9011
126
Table S2. Data Collection and Refinement Statistics, Related to Figure 6.
DH427
DH428
DH427/gp120 core
Data collection
Space group
P212121
P21221
P64
Cell dimensions
a,b,c (Å)
78.6, 154.2, 163.6
73.1, 74.6, 102.6
162.9, 162.9, 229.9
()
90, 90, 90
90, 90, 90
90, 90, 120
Resolution (Å)
48.90 – 2.66
(2.74 – 2.66)*
60.36 – 2.32
(2.40 – 2.32)
141.08 – 6.63
(6.80-6.63)
Rsym or Rmerge
17.1 (92.2)
8.6 (74.4)
27.3 (233.1)
7.0 (1.3)
14.6 (2.2)
7.9 (1.1)
Completeness (%)
97.3 (85.5)
91.7 (95.0)
98.1 (94.1)
Redundancy
4.8 (4.7)
4.0 (3.9)
6.7 (6.6)
Refinement
Resolution (Å)
48.90 - 2.66
60.36 – 2.32
141.08 – 6.63
No. reflections
55460
22892
5756
Rwork / Rfree (%)
23.0/26.2
21.8/26.5
25.6/30.5
No. atoms
12691
3234
11572
Protein
12584
3151
11572
Water
107
83
0
B-factors
Protein
27.1
48.5
276.60
Solvent
11.9
48.9
--
R.m.s. deviations
Bond lengths (Å)
0.004
0.009
0.009
Bond angles ()
0.91
1.28
1.40
*Values in parentheses are for highest-resolution shell. One crystal was used for data collection for the DH428 Fab.
Multiple crystals were used for DH427 and the complex.