PresentationPDF Available

Abstract

Axiology, a branch of philosophy, involves ethics and aesthetics.
Branches of Philosophy: Axiology
Presented by: Mubeshera Tufail
Department of Education
Faculty of Social Sciences
International Islamic University
Islamabad
Etymology
Definitions
Historical Background
What is value?
Nature of Value
Kinds of Values
Hierarchy of Values
General Theory of Value
Branches of Axiology
Axiology and Modern Man
Axiology and Religion
Axiology and Science
Axiology and Society
Axiology and Education
Axiology in our Daily Life
Conclusion
References
The word “Axiology” is derived from two
Greek roots
‘Axios’ Worth or Value
‘Logos’ Logic or Theory
(Arora, 2010)
Axiology is the branch of philosophy
dealing with quality or value
(Rosenthal,1967).
Axiology is the branch of philosophy that
studies judgments about values including
both of ethics and aesthetics (Chopra,
2005).
The term “Axiology” was first used in the
early 20th century by Paul Lapie and E. Von
Hartmann (Arora,2010).
The search for a science of value originated
with early Greek philosophers in 5th and 6th
centuries B.C.
During medieval times, it was argued for the
division of religious(faith, hope and love) and
natural values i.e., wisdom, courage,
temperance and justice (identified by Plato).
The 20th century saw the rise of Pragmatism.
(Foss & Littlejohn,2009)
Gradually the modern view of morality
emerged i.e., Values are regarded as tools
for processing of ideas and things
(Foss & Littlejohn,2009)
Values are the preferences made on the basis
of what we consider ‘good’ in various fields
of life (Lobo, 1974).
Value may be some sort of existent with a
particular property or properties, which can be
discussed in terms of its nature and its
relationship to other existents (Bowyer,1970).
Value is the property of material object and
phenomenon of social consciousness which
characterize its importance to society, to a
class or a man (Rosenthal & Yudin, 1967).
Values may be subjective (personal) or
objective (impersonal).
Values may be changing or constant.
(Kneller,1971)
There are seven types of values which are as
follows:
Health, Bodily, Recreational
Economic Values
Social values
Moral Values
Aesthetic Values
Intellectual values
Religious Values
(Lobo, 1974)
Idealists’ View
Realists' View
Pragmatist’s View
(Kneller,1971)
Experimentalists Objects
acquires value after choosing.
Emotivists Individuals will
decide which value should be adopted?
Objectivists Values are in objects
or in relation among objects.
(Lobo, 1974)
Axiology
Ethics Aesthetics
(Arora,2010)
Ethics studies values in the realm of
human conduct (Kneller,1971).
“Ethics evaluates human habits, character
and voluntary determination and their
propriety” (Singh &Nath, 2008).
It deals with such questions as:
(a)What is good for all men?
(b)How one should behave?
(c)What is right?
(d)What is morally wrong?
Aesthetics studies values in the realm of
beauty (Kneller,1971).
Aesthetics involves the study of art and
experience of beauty (Sharma,2010).
Aesthetic values are likely to be personal
and subjective (Kneller,1971).
It discusses such questions:
(a) what is beauty?
(b) which art should be appraised?
(c) What is the importance of art in
human life?
Axiology can guide human life, individual
as well as social, secular as well as non-
secular, in the right direction.
Man searches for truth, praises beautiful
and attempts good. Axiology serve as a
guide for this purpose.
(Nigal,1986)
The main concern of religion is the
relationship between God and man, and
between man and man.
Religion emphasizes self-control and
conservation of values i.e., individual,
social, spiritual values.
(Nigal,1986)
Science can provide us with means only, it
can never give about ends.
It is the philosophy of values which helps
us in deciding as to how and for what
purpose these means should be utilized.
(Nigal, 1986)
Each society has its own set of values. All
the individuals should adopt those values.
Values are everywhere in education.
By using values
a. Teachers evaluate Student.
b. Students Evaluate Teachers.
c. Society and Educators evaluate each
other.
(Kneller,1971)
“Axiological thinking” or “thinking on
values” is unavoidable and necessary.
We are busy in “axiological thinking” or
“thinking on value” when we refer to such
notions as:
“Success” and “Failure”
“Progress” and “ Regress”
“Better” and “Worse”
“More efficient” and “less efficient”
“Needed” and “Not Needed”
“More important” and “Less Important”
(Skowronski,2009)
We all possess values that guide our
thoughts, actions and behaviors in every
aspect and field of life i.e., personal, social,
intellectual and emotional. We are involved
in axiological thinking in every moment,
intentionally or unintentionally.
Arora,N.(2010). Educational Philosophy. Delhi: Saurabh
Publishing House.
Bowyer,Carlton H.(1970).Philosophical Perspectives for
Education.USA:Scott, Foresman and Company.
Chopra,R.(2005).Academic Dictionary of
Philosophy.Delhi:Isha Books.
Ebert,E.S. & Culyer,R.C.(2011).School: An Introduction
to Education.USA:Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Foss,K.A.& Littlejohn,S.W .(2009).Encyclopedia of
Communication Theory.USA:SAGE Publications,Inc.
Kneller,George F.(1971).Introduction to Philosophy of
Education. USA:John Wiley & Sons,Inc.
Lobo,A.T.(1974).Educational Ideas and Their
Impact.Karachi:Rotti Press.
Nath,R. & Singh,Y.K.(2008). Education in Emerging
Indian Society. New Delhi: APH Publishing Corporation.
Nigal, S.G.(1986).Axiological Approach to Vedas. New
Delhi: Northern Book Centre.
Skowronski,K.P.(2009).Values and Powers: Re-reading
the Philosophical Tradition of American Pragmatism.
Rodopi:New York.
Sharma,A.P.(2010).Indian and Western Philosophy.New
Delhi: Unicorn Books.
... Typically, when a researcher recognizes that their research is influenced by personal values and subjectivity, it is known as the interpretive approach axiology. This study follows the positivist axiology approach to research, which asserts that research is value-free, meaning the researcher remains independent of the facts and maintains an impartial attitude (Rangel, 2019;Mubeshera, 2012;Michael, 1987). ➢ The research strategy for this investigation follows the positivist technique of data gathering. ...
Article
Full-text available
Information and communication technologies (ICTs) have been widely used in different industries, including international humanitarian organizations (IHOs). This study explores the complex connection between ICT solutions, governance practices, and the effectiveness of IHOs. The study uses a detailed questionnaire survey to evaluate how ICT affects organizational outcomes and also investigates the strategic choice of ICT technical partners and suppliers. The study highlights the interconnectedness between organizational governance, ICT governance, and IHO success. The study uses the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) method to assess sampling adequacy and conducts several statistical analyses such as Cronbach's alpha for reliability, regression analysis, correlation assessment, and ANOVA to evaluate three hypotheses. This comprehensive statistical method reveals the relationships between many factors such as employee engagement, governance, ICT partner satisfaction, ICT governance and management, and employee satisfaction. The results support the idea that ICTs are essential for modern businesses and emphasize the crucial influence of organizational governance and ICT governance on organizational results. Moreover, the study emphasizes the need of choosing suitable ICT partners and providers. Organizational outcomes are significantly impacted by the selection of ICT solutions and partners, highlighting the crucial role of strategic decision-making in ICT procurement. This study highlights the importance of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) for International Humanitarian Organizations (IHOs), emphasizing the significant relationship between ICT solutions, organizational governance, ICT governance, and the strategic choice of ICT partners. These elements collectively enhance the success and efficacy of International Humanitarian Organizations in carrying out their humanitarian objectives.
Article
Full-text available
Values find their full completion only in the competent behaviour of university members. The values of a university are directly linked with the competences of university teachers and, together with the principles of sustainability, are the crucial pillars of a ‘sustainability triangle’ of higher education institutions that is introduced and modelled in this paper, which examines these phenomena and the potential ties existing between them. We experimentally define the 10 principles of sustainability in higher education based on the personal academic experience of the authors as well the most frequently cited opinions in the literature. The paper subsequently presents the results of a sociological survey performed in two European countries and compares the results of Czech university students in the public security sector (n = 396) with those of Slovak university students in the IT sector (n = 246). An almost perfect correlation between student opinions from both sectors was confirmed with the use of Pearson’s product moments and an unpaired two-sample Student’s t-test. The results help to affirm all the postulated principles of sustainability and to approve the accuracy of the model presented, i.e., a Triangle of/for Sustainable Higher Education Institutions. The results obtained as well as our arguments simultaneously call on the governing bodies of ministries and universities to focus efforts on the harmonisation of personal and institutional values, opinions, principles, aspirations, and various motivations of all members of the university, i.e., students, teachers, and advisers.
Educational Philosophy
  • N Arora
 Arora,N.(2010). Educational Philosophy. Delhi: Saurabh Publishing House.