Content uploaded by Sergey Bulat
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Sergey Bulat on Jan 14, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org
Opinion piece
Cite this article: Bulat SA. 2016 Microbiology
of the subglacial Lake Vostok: rst results of
borehole-frozen lake water analysis and
prospects for searching for lake inhabitants.
Phil.Trans.R.Soc.A374: 20140292.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0292
Accepted: 2 September 2015
One contribution of 17 to a Theo Murphy
meeting issue ‘Antarctic subglacial lake
exploration: rst results and future plans’.
Subject Areas:
biogeochemistry, glaciology
Keywords:
Antarctica, subglacial Lake Vostok,
borehole -frozen water, extremophiles,
unknown bacteria, contamination
Author for correspondence:
Sergey A. Bulat
e-mail: bulat@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru
Microbiology of the subglacial
LakeVostok:rstresultsof
borehole-frozen lake water
analysis and prospects for
searching for lake inhabitants
Sergey A. Bulat1,2
1Division of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics, B.P. Konstantinov
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, National Research Centre
‘Kurchatov Institute’, 188300 Gatchina, Russia
2Department of Physical Methods and Devices for Quality Control,
Institute of Physics and Technology, Ural Federal University,
620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
This article examines the question of the possible
existence of microbial life inhabiting the subglacial
Lake Vostok buried beneath a 4 km thick Antarctic
ice sheet. It represents the results of analysis of the
only available frozen lake water samples obtained
upon the first lake entry and subsequent re-coring the
water frozen within the borehole. For comparison,
results obtained by earlier molecular microbiological
studies of accretion ice are included in this study,
with the focus on thermophiles and an unknown
bacterial phylotype. A description of two Lake
Vostok penetrations is presented for the first time
from the point of view of possible clean water
sampling. Finally, the results of current studies of
Lake Vostok frozen water samples are presented,
with the focus on the discovery of another unknown
bacterial phylotype w123-10 distantly related to the
above-mentioned unknown phylotype AF532061
detected in Vostok accretion ice, both successfully
passing all possible controls for contamination. The
use of clean-room facilities and the establishment
of a contaminant library are considered to be
prerequisites for research on microorganisms
from Lake Vostok. It seems that not yet recorded
microbial life could exist within the Lake Vostok
2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. Allrights reser ved.
on January 12, 2016http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/Downloaded from
2
rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R.Soc.A374:20140292
.........................................................
water body. In conclusion, the prospects for searching for lake inhabitants are expressed with
the intention to sample the lake water as cleanly as possible in order to make sure that further
results will be robust.
1. Introduction
The subglacial Lake Vostok is a well-known giant lake in Eastern Antarctica [1, fig. 1]. Many
works have been performed on clarifying its geophysics, geology, chemistry, gas content,
biogeochemistry and biology, and microbiology in particular [2,3]. The main scientific objective
of the lake entry is to search for unusual microbial life that could cope with its extreme
conditions—pressure reaching 400 bar, temperature close to freezing point, no light, no dissolved
organic carbon [4], very dilute major chemical ions, long-term isolation from the above surface
biota (at least 14 Ma) [5] and very probable excess of dissolved oxygen (in the range of
700–1300 mg l−1)[6,7].
It is likely that the lake existed before Antarctic glaciations, which could be suggested based
on interpretation of its geological setting [8,9], and numerous life forms could have flourished
in the lake before glaciation started. Therefore, it is a big challenge to discover the life, if any,
that remained to thrive in the water body of the lake and its sediments. The present-day lake
access technique is based on electromechanical ice drilling with the use of kerosene drilling
fluid [10,11], which is chemically and microbiologically dirty [12]. Taking into account such a
contamination threat and the very small amounts of microbial cells detected in the accretion
(naturally frozen lake water) ice [13], further research requires the development of special clean
lake entry technologies as well as strict decontamination procedures. It is also crucial to discover
a way to prevent contamination of the devices to be lowered into the lake in order to record its
physical and chemical parameters, to measure dissolved oxygen content and, finally, to provide
researchers with clean samples of water/sediments.
The deepest part of the 5G borehole-recovered ice, starting from the depth of 3539m, consists
of accretion ice, i.e. naturally frozen lake water accreted to the glacier floating above the lake.
Drillers cored this ice for a long time and many samples were provided for different studies,
including research of French [14–17] and US scientists [18–22]. This ice consists of two layers—
accretion ice type I with entrapped minerals, mostly mica–clay (along with small rock fragments)
inclusions, originating from the lake shore, and accretion ice type II composed of very clean giant
monocrystalline ice originating from the deep part of the lake [2].
Comprehensive analyses (constrained by ancient DNA research criteria and performed
with the use of clean-room facilities and microbial DNA-free consumables and reagents) have
showed that the microbial biomass of accretion ice is generally very low. Only ice type I
containing mica–clay inclusions allowed the discovery of a few bacterial phylotypes all passing
numerous contaminant control criteria. They include a well-known chemolithoautotrophic
thermophile Hydrogenophilus thermoluteolus (100% sequence similarity) (β-Proteobacteria), an
actinobacterium related to Ilumatobacter fluminis (95% similarity), along with an unidentified
unclassified bacterium AF532061 (92% similarity to closest relatives) [23–25]. By contrast, the
deeper accretion ice type II with no entrapped sediments gave no reliable signals (no polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) signals or only contaminants [25]). It is worth noting that archaeal DNA was
not detected in both types of accretion ice.
2. Lake Vostok entry and sampling of borehole-frozen lake water
The first entry into Lake Vostok was performed at the depth of 3769.3 m on 6 February 2012. The
water rose up into the borehole to 363 m and froze. With regard to the research programme, a
small sample of frozen water that became stuck in a drill bit during this entry, hereafter drillbit
water, was provided for biological studies. During the next season, 2012–2013, drillers re-cored the
on January 12, 2016http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/Downloaded from
3
rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R.Soc.A374:20140292
.........................................................
fast frozen lake water and were able to obtain only 32 m of the ice core. Further drilling operations
of re-coring of this frozen lake water were influenced by the old borehole geometry and went out
into the pristine glacial ice. Three ice samples of this 32 m long ice core (from the topmost full-
cylinder ice core containing kerosene in bubbles to the bottommost moon-shaped ‘milky’ ice),
hereafter borehole-frozen water, were provided for microbiological analyses.
The second entry into the lake occurred at the depth of 3769.15 m some 3 years later, on 25
January 2015. The water rose up again into the borehole to the level of about 70 m and was left to
freeze. In 4 days, drillers re-cored the icy ‘cork’ and obtained about 12m of the new fast frozen
lake water core before the water came up again into the borehole and finally froze at the level
of 65–67 m above the ice–water interface. The bottommost 10 cm (of 12 m core) frozen water ice
segment was provided for microbiological studies.
However, despite the fact that the Russians were the first to enter a subglacial Antarctic lake at
such a great depth (3769 m) and were able to perform the lake entry twice, the drilling technology
used (electromechanical drill along with kerosene drilling fluid with the use of foranes (namely
Freon 141B, 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane, as densifier)) proved to be inappropriate to collect
liquid water in general and clean samples in particular. More technological developments are
needed to face such a challenge, including the development of sophisticated systems consisting
of well-sealed transport modules preventing the contamination of in-module-encapsulated
devices/samplers with the drilling fluid [11] as well as the use of thermal drilling just before
the next lake entry, which is now under discussion.
3. First results from borehole-frozen water of Lake Vostok upon rst lake entry
The main objective of this study was to search for resident microbial life in the subglacial Lake
Vostok by studying the uppermost layer of the water that entered the borehole upon the first lake
entry (5 February 2012) and then was frozen, in comparison with thoroughly studied accretion
ice [23,24]. The fast frozen water samples included the drillbit water along with three samples of
re-cored borehole-frozen water. The fast frozen lake water collected upon the second lake entry
in 2015 is still waiting to be analysed.
Both types of fast frozen lake water samples proved to be contaminated with the drilling
fluid. The drillbit water sample was heavily polluted with drilling fluid (at ratio 1 : 1) while
borehole-frozen water samples were rather clean but still contained numerous microdroplets
of drilling fluid, giving the ice a ‘milky’ appearance. The cell concentrations measured by flow
cytofluorometry showed 167 cells per millilitre in the drillbit water sample while borehole-frozen
water samples contained from 5.5 to 38 cells per millilitre. At the same time, drill fluid analyses
showed about 100 cells per millilitre [12].
The ice samples were strictly decontaminated in the cold-room facilities of LGGE UJF-CNRS,
Université J. Fourier, Grenoble, France (with outer core cut out, rinsed with GC-grade pentane
and ozone treated—depending on the ice sample facture), and meltwater was processed in
clean-room facilities using centrifugal filtering through 5–10 kDa membranes (5 kDa (45.9 nm)
allows us to collect 135 kb DNA fragments). Genomic DNA was also extracted in clean-room
facilities using bead-based cell lysis kits, plastic ware and solutes that were made DNA-free
using 100 kDa membrane filtering and ozone treatment. Primary PCR reactions targeted different
regions (v3–v5, v4–v8, v4–v6, v4 and full gene) of 16S rRNA genes and were again processed in
clean-room facilities while amplicons generated were analysed outside of these facilities and even
not in the same building/country to prevent the clean-room facilities from amplicon carry-over
contamination.
A total of 49 bacterial phylotypes were discovered by sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA genes.
Of them, only two phylotypes have successfully passed all contamination criteria, including
our own contaminant library [23] consisting of 278 phylotypes (as of June 2014) originating
from various contamination sources (e.g. negative PCR, sham DNA extraction, human-associated
bacteria, drilling fluid, even dust microparticles in clean-room facilities). With no such library the
work on tiny cell biomass is meaningless.
on January 12, 2016http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/Downloaded from
4
rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R.Soc.A374:20140292
.........................................................
The first remaining phylotype, hereafter w123-10, proved to be a hitherto-unknown type
of bacterium showing less than 86% sequence similarity to known taxa. Its phylogenetic
assignment to bacterial divisions was also unsuccessful except for the fact that it showed
reliable clustering with the above-mentioned unidentified bacterium AF532061 earlier detected
in accretion ice. The second phylotype is still dubious in terms of contamination. It showed 93%
similarity to Janthinobacterium sp. of Oxalobacteraceae (β-Proteobacteria)—well-known ‘water-
loving’ bacteria, though we do not expect to meet a known representative of Oxalobacteraceae
in Lake Vostok because of its hitherto known physical–chemical conditions. Notably, no Archaea
were detected in all tested samples of frozen lake water.
Regarding 47 contaminant phylotypes detected in drillbit and borehole-frozen lake water
samples, they proved to belong to several bacterial divisions Proteobacteria (33 phylotypes),
Actinobacteria (six phylotypes), Firmicutes (seven phylotypes) and Bacteroidetes (one phylotype)
with predominance of γ-Proteobacteria (19 phylotypes), which indicates that the main sources of
contamination were human-associated and soil bacteria. It means that, even working in clean-
room facilities and trying to avoid bacterial contamination of the human/soil source, we still face
a big challenge and personnel should be taught properly to follow the rules of working with
traces of DNA under clean-room conditions. A low amount of Archaea, if any, inhabit human
skin, which is why they were reasonably not detected in our PCR trials. At the same time, it
means that with no access to clean-room facilities, which includes the use of ultra-clean water,
there is no chance to cope with the bacterial contamination while working with valuable dilute
DNA samples.
4. Expectations and prospects for searching for lake inhabitants
At present, the most important finding is the unidentified unclassified bacterial phylotype w123-
10, which along with another one (AF532061 [23]) may represent indigenous cell populations
in the subglacial Lake Vostok provided they are able to cope with the high dissolved oxygen
content/highly oxidized environment (at least 320 mgl−1) (V. Lipenkov, personal communication,
2015, at this Theo Murphy meeting), which can represent the main constraint for microbial life in
the lake water. At the same time, a kind of proof may come with analyses of a new sample of fast
frozen lake water obtained upon second lake entry (25 January 2015).
However, it is worth noting that there is little hope of finding active (propagating) microbial
populations at the uppermost lake water level, which contacts directly the overcooled water–
glacier interface where the ice accretes. A true challenge would be to collect the water within the
whole water column (680 m below the borehole) and especially closer to sediments where the
water is expected to be warmer and enriched with mineral nutrients. For this, we need to sample
the lake water as cleanly as possible upon further clean lake entry using special water sampling
devices well protected from contamination with drilling fluid. Such devices are planned to be
developed and manufactured at PNPI NRC KI (Russia) based on the experience of UK ‘Ellsworth’
project engineers.
Competing interests. The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Funding. The reported study was partially supported by RFBR, research project RFBR-CNRS_a no. 14-05-93110.
Acknowledgements. French colleagues (J. R. Petit et al., LGGE UJF-CNRS, Grenoble; D. Marie, Biological Station
CNRS, Roscoff) are highly appreciated for providing cold and clean laboratory facilities along with valuable
advice and for measuring cell concentrations. All members of the French GeoMEX team are also thanked
for numerous attempts to document cells/microbial DNA in Vostok accretion ice samples using different
microscopy and other techniques. SCAR SALEGoS workgroup and its follower the SALE program are
especially grateful for the broadcasting and the attention paid to the SALE studies. Russian Antarctic
Expedition and drillers from Russian Mining Institute are thanked for providing us with ice and frozen
lake water samples. PNPI NRC KI and cryoastrobiology laboratory employees along with undergraduate
students are particularly grateful for the support and possibility of direct participation in the research and
results obtained. The research was supported in part by the Act 211 Government of the Russian Federation,
agreement No. 02.A03.21.0006.
on January 12, 2016http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/Downloaded from
5
rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R.Soc.A374:20140292
.........................................................
References
1. Siegert MJ, Priscu JC, Alekhina IA, Wadham JL, Lyons WB. 2016 Antarctic subglacial
lake exploration: first results and future plans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 374, 20140466.
(doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0466)
2. Petit JR, Alekhina I, Bulat S. 2005 Lake Vostok, Antarctica: exploring a subglacial lake and
searching for life in an extreme environment. In Lectures in astrobiology, Vol. I, Part 1,The
early Earth and other cosmic habitats for life (eds M Gargaud, B Barbier, H Martin, J Reisse),
Advances in Astrobiology and Biogeophysics, pp. 227–288. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
(doi:10.1007/10913406_8)
3. Bulat S, Petit JR. 2011 Vostok, subglacial lake. In Encyclopedia of astrobiology (eds R Amils,
J Cernicharo Quintanilla, HJ Cleaves II, WM Irvine, D Pinti, M Viso), pp. 1754–1758, 1st edn.
Berlin, Germany: Springer. (doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11274-4_1765)
4. Preunkert S, Legrand M, Stricker P, Bulat S, Alekhina I, Petit JR, Hoffmann H, May B, Jourdain
B. 2011 Quantification of dissolved organic carbon at very low levels in natural ice samples by
a UV induced oxidation method. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 673–678. (doi:10.1021/es1023256)
5. Sun B, Siegert MJ, Mudd SM, Sugden D, Fujita S, Cui X, Jiang Y, Tang X, Li Y. 2009 The
Gamburtsev Mountains and the origin and early evolution of the Antarctic ice sheet. Nature
459, 690–693. (doi:10.1038/nature08024)
6. McKay CP, Hand KP, Doran PT, Andersen DT, Priscu JC. 2003 Clathrate formation and the
fate of noble and biologically useful gases in Lake Vostok, Antarctica. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30,
3-51–3-54. (doi:10.1029/2003GL017490)
7. Lipenkov VY, Istomin VA. 2001 On the stability of air clathrate–hydrate crystals in subglacial
Lake Vostok, Antarctica. Data Glaciol. Stud. 91, 138–149.
8. Leitchenkov GL, Belyatsky BV, Popkov AM, Popov SV. 2004 Geological nature of subglacial
Lake Vostok, East Antarctica. Data Glaciol. Stud. 98, 81–92.
9. Ferraccioli F, Finn CA, Jordan TA, Bell RE, Anderson LM, Damaske D. 2008 East Antarctic
rifting triggers uplift of the Gamburtsev Mountains. Nature 479, 388–392. (doi:10.1038/
nature10566)
10. Lukin V, Bulat S. 2011 Vostok subglacial lake: details of Russian plans/activities for drilling
and sampling. In Antarctic subglacial aquatic environments (eds MJ Siegert, MC Kennicutt II, RA
Bindschadler), Geophysical Monograph Series, vol. 192, ch. 11, pp. 187–197. Washington, DC:
American Geophysical Union. (doi:10.1002/9781118670354.ch11)
11. Lukin VV, Vasiliev NI. 2014 Technological aspects of the final phase of drilling borehole 5G
and unsealing Vostok subglacial lake, East Antarctica. Ann. Glaciol. 55, 83–89. (doi:10.3189/
2014AoG65A002)
12. Alekhina I, Marie D, Petit JR, Lukin V, Zubkov V, Bulat S. 2007 Molecular analysis of
bacterial diversity in kerosene-based drilling fluid from the deep ice borehole at Vostok, East
Antarctica. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 59, 289–299. (doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00271.x)
13. Bulat S, Alekhina I, Lipenkov V, Lukin V, Marie D, Petit JR. 2009 Cell concentrations of
microorganisms in glacial and lake ice of the Vostok ice core, East Antarctica. Microbiology
78, 808–810. (doi:10.1134/S0026261709060216)
14. Souchez R, Petit JR, Tison J-L, Jouzel J, Verbeke V. 2000 Ice formation in subglacial
Lake Vostok, Central Antarctica. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 181, 529–538. (doi:10.1016/S0012-
821X(00)00228-4)
15. Souchez R, Jean-Baptiste P, Petit JR, Lipenkov VYA, Jouzel J. 2002 What is the deepest part of
the Vostok ice core telling us? Earth-Sci. Rev. 60, 131–146. (doi:10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00090-9)
16. de Angelis M, Petit J-R, Savarino J, Souchez R, Thiemens MH. 2004 Contributions of an
ancient evaporitic-type reservoir to subglacial Lake Vostok chemistry. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
222, 751–765. (doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2004.03.023)
17. de Angelis M, Morel-Fourcade M-C, Barnola J-M, Susini J, Duval P. 2005 Brine micro-droplets
and solid inclusions in accreted ice from Lake Vostok (East Antarctica). Geophys. Res. Lett. 32,
L12501. (doi:10.1029/2005GL022460)
18. Bell RE, Studinger M, Tikku AA, Clarke GKC, Gutner MM, Meertens C. 2002 Origin and fate
of Lake Vostok water frozen to the base of the East Antarctic ice sheet. Nature 416, 307–310.
(doi:10.1038/416307a)
19. Priscu JC et al. 1999 Geomicrobiology of subglacial ice above Lake Vostok, Antarctica. Science
286, 2141–2144. (doi:10.1126/science.286.5447.2141)
on January 12, 2016http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/Downloaded from
6
rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org Phil.Trans.R.Soc.A374:20140292
.........................................................
20. Karl DM, Bird DF, Bjorkman K, Shackelford R, Houlihan T, Tupas L. 1999
Microorganisms in the accreted ice of Lake Vostok, Antarctica. Science 286, 2144–2147.
(doi:10.1126/science.286.5447.2144)
21. Christner BC, Mosley-Thompson E, Thompson LG, Reeve JN. 2001 Isolation of bacteria and
16S rDNAs from Lake Vostok accretion ice. Environ. Microbiol. 3, 570–577. (doi:10.1046/j.
1462-2920.2001.00226.x)
22. Christner BC et al. 2006 Limnological conditions in subglacial Lake Vostok, Antarctica. Limnol.
Oceanogr. 51, 2485–2501. (doi:10.4319/lo.2006.51.6.2485)
23. Bulat S et al. 2004 DNA signature of thermophilic bacteria from the aged accretion ice of
Lake Vostok, Antarctica: implications for searching for life in extreme icy environments. Int. J.
Astrobiol. 3, 1–7. (doi:10.1017/S1473550404001879)
24. Lavire C, Normand P, Alekhina I, Bulat S, Prieur D, Birrien JL, Fournier P, Hanni C, Petit
JR. 2006 Presence of Hydrogenophilus thermoluteolus DNA in accretion ice in the subglacial
Lake Vostok, Antarctica, assessed using rrs, cbb and hox. Environ. Microbiol. 8, 2106–2114.
(doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01087.x)
25. Bulat SA, Marie D, Petit JR. 2012 Prospects for life in the subglacial Lake Vostok, East
Antarctica. Ice Snow 4, 92–96.
on January 12, 2016http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/Downloaded from
A preview of this full-text is provided by The Royal Society.
Content available from Philosophical Transactions A
This content is subject to copyright.