To all Developmentalists, the undeniable failure rates for Developmental Interventions across the paradigms of Psychology, Organizational Science and Economics, which range from 50% for the former to 100% for the latter, should be truly shocking; and while they are alarming in their own right, they also signal a fundamental paradigmatic deficit, and it is one that is already acknowledged across the board, because, across each domain, the same fundamental remedy for the common deficit has been prescribed, and that remedy is “Learning”, whether it is as Learning Life, Learning Organization, Learning Region, Learning Economy or more recently by Nobel Economist Joe Stiglitz, Learning Society, which he refers to as the only viable long-run Government strategy. However, he and his co-author Bruce Greenwald, like others, have had little option but to defer the operationalizing of this Vision to Psychology; and even though there is such demand for a model of Developmental Learning from both outside Psychology and also internally, from prominent Psychologists such as Dan McAdams, no such model has been devised – until now.
UDT is peer-reviewed as equally valid and operationalizable across each of these paradigms, i.e., for developmental diagnosis and intervention for people, organizations and also macro socio-economic systems such as regions and nations. The modelling for each of these three levels of system – already understood as micro-, meso- and macro socio-economic system – is presented in four different volumes with the emphasis in Vol. 1, on the Psychology behind the model and what it brings to the discipline in terms of both theory and practice.
The model comprises of 7 Levels encompassing a sequence of 15 Developmental Phases through which humans naturally learn developmentally, and these Phases correspond with – but also complete – existing models of both natural and interventionist development, so that, in effect, each school is shown to have been seeing some of the same patterns, but through different lenses, and based on different and ultimately, limiting assumptions. UDT also shows how such developmental learning stalls along this progression in well-established patterns of corresponding Habituation Stages such as Groupthink at (2a), and how progression or degradation is affected by the Attractors of ultimate Maturity and Immaturity. The Levels are called Inversion, Critical, Equilibrial, Operational, Complexity, Creativity and finally, Leadership where the ultimate Maturization Phase is called Regenerative Leadership which encompasses Regenerative Eco-System – a concept that applies equally as e.g., Family, Organization or Economy where the system produces offspring that are integratively independent but networked whether as children, spin-off enterprises or enterprise clusters, respectively.
Along these Phases, functional dimensions called Construct Capabilities, that are significant to a system’s maturization can be diagnosed and developed. Failure rates are shown to be either due to interventions being overpitched relative to the previously undiagnosable learning level of the system, or through missing any of the Phases. Diagnosis with UDT optimizes traction for interventions which also gain in terms of sustainability from the normatively prescribed developmental process through the Phases. Critically, the model differentiates between systems, including people, who can take on board developmental intervention as a “next-Phase” process, from those who need radical process starting at Phase (1a); while concluding that much of the success reported across Developmentalism is dependent on the maturity of the client system (person or organization) in the first place.
In Psychology, such methodology can be used discretely through frameworks that are introduced; or more broadly, the model can provide an overarching architecture to guide and offer completion to established clinical process in practice, and it can also provide structure and discipline to more recent methods such as Open Dialogue with which it already shows considerable correspondence. One example of correspondence is that between the lowest Level’s three Stages of Habituation with DSM-5’s three Clusters of Personality-Disorders, and UDT can be seen to add considerable value to understanding and profiling them as well as operationalizing recovery, and particular attention is given to Narcissistic Personality Disorder – the prevalence of which is reported in terms of being an epidemic in prevailing Western society. It is also shown how the lowest Stage (1a) is always a drag on development in a process called Inversion that also finds common ground with established theory; and unfortunately, it is also shown that Inversion is very clearly observable in the demise of families and organizations, but is also evident in many prevailing threats to Democratic systems.
Many other issues are elaborated. For example, the concepts of Linear, Lateral and Integrative Mindset Configurations are already established to different degrees in Psychology and the other paradigms, but each are now extended considerably. They are now shown to be critical in different Phases of Development while Habituation patterns for each are associated with different stages, so that the understanding of how each shapes Personality and Culture and then leads to distinctive debilitating friction in systems, is greatly enhanced. Similarly, the concept of Culture which is seen as the collective equivalent of Mindset is transformed. The best existing theory delineates ten different types which map directly onto the hierarchy, and in the order in which they are shown to relate to higher productivity and returns for both organizations and nations alike; so again, UDT finds construct validity through correspondence with existing modelling, while at the same time bringing completion (with five other culture types), as well as operationalization of what has been a most troublesome but nebulously-operationalized concept.
The new model is shown to illuminate many other issues in society. The demise of grand theory and religion are implicated in the rise of Post-Modernist Skepticism, disrespect for authority, rise of authoritarianism, etc., which all poses an existential threat to Democracy and international order. UDT clearly shows the immaturity of all of the fallen theories and religions, and Vol. 1 introduces how Vol. 3 focuses on re-establishing, modelling, and operationalizing Emotional Maturity to bolster family life and counter failure in this area as measured by family breakup; and also, a model of Spiritual Maturity that has been eroded by different Religions that are, in turn, shown to have been shaped by particular different immature Mindsets and Cultures, and where failure is measured in terms of the catastrophic damage of religious conflict at the macro level but also Inversion at all levels of society.
Furthermore, it is proposed that UDT can provide a broad platform to build the called-for Learning Society, but as a Phase on the journey toward an optimal Regenerative Society, especially if re-enforced by UDT modelling outlined across all 4 Volumes.
The conclusion arises that UDT offers a single means of unifying a disjointed paradigm in Psychology, fulfils Psychology’s obligation to other paradigms, and facilitates it taking its rightful place at the center of world affairs that at all levels of our world can now benefit from working developmentally in congruence with human nature rather than antagonizing it.