A phylogenetic study of the Terebrinae (Molluscs, Caenogastropoda, Terebridae) based on species from the Western Atlantic. J. Comp. Biol. 3(2):J37-150. Terebrine characters, including shell and foregut features and other structures arc discussed. A phylogenetic analysis was performed, using as terminal taxa the best known species, mainly from the Western Atlantic-Hastula cincrca (Born); H. hastata (Gmelin); Terebra gcmmulata Kiener; T. crassircticula Simone; T. leptapsis Simone; T. brasiliensis Smith; T. spirosulcata Simone & EM. Costa; T. taurina Lightfoot; T. dislocata (Say) (this latter species is redescribed). Considering this sample of the subfamily Terebrinac and literature data, a ground plan of the subfamily is proposed and its monophyly discussed. A set of 44 characters (55 states) were cladisticly analyzed (3 of shell, 7 of head-foot, 9 of pallial organs, 2 of kidney, 10 of foregut, 3 of remainder digestive system, 10 of genital system), from which a single most parsimonious tree was obtained: ((H. cincrca + H. hastata) + (T. taurina + ((T. crassircticula + T. Icptapsis) + (T. spirosulcata + (T. geminulata + T. brasiliensis))))) (length 74; CI 70; RI 57). Terebrinae, Tcrcbra and Hastula are monophylctic. The terebrines are characterized, beyond the obvious shell characters, by the following-apomorphies: reduction of the cephalic tentacles, anterior end of the ctenidial vein prominent (without gill filaments), rhynchodcal introvert, and anus situated very posteriorly in the pallial cavity. Hastula synapomorphics include enlarged foot and complexity of osphradium filaments. Tcrcbra synapomorphics include the eye situated at the apex of the tentacles and a clear tendency for enlargement of the introvert, reduction of the proboscis and venom apparatus with their entire reduction in the last elements of the clade. The accessory proboscis structure is considered homoplastic in two cladcs of Tcrcbra, but may be a terebrid synapomorphy, since it is present in some spcies of Hastula, so it could have been secondarily lost in several species. Introduction The Terebridae is easily distinguished from the other two families of Conoidea by their elongated, multispiral shell. The superfamily Conoidea (= Toxoglossa) is characterized mainly by a modified foregut and the presence of a complex venom apparatus (Kantor, 1990). The classification and important characters of the shell, operculum and foregut are dealt with in an important paper by Taylor, Kantor & Sysoev (1993), who provide also a standardization of the anatomical terminology and a phylogenetic analysis. The foregut characters of the Terebridae have been focused by several recent papers (Miller, 1971; Taylor & Miller, 1990; Taylor, 1990). A list of the recent species of the world is given by Bratcher & Cernohorsky (1987). The classification of the Terebridae evolved little since Bruguiere (1789), who created the genus Terebra for the Linnaean species Buccinum subulatum. Forty-one terebrid genera and subgenera have been proposed (Wenz, 1938; Bratcher & Cernohorsky, 1987), but had little acceptance amongst malacologists, and now almost all species are included in Terebra. A synthesis of the present classification of the family is as follows (fossils not included): subfamily Pervicaciinae (about 25 species of the Indo-Pacific region), including Pervicacea Iredale, 1924 and Diplomeriza Dall, 1919 (= Duplicaria Dall, 1908; not Rafinesque, 1833); subfamily Terebrinae (worldwide), including Terebra (over 200 species) and Hastula H. & A. Adams, 1853 (about 30 species). The Brazilian terebrids were revised by Matthews et al. (1975). They were also considered in isolated papers (Marcus & Marcus, 1960; Bratcher & Cernohorsky, 1985; Auffenberg & Lee, 1988; Simone & Verissimo, 1995; Simone, 1999), some of them with anatomical data. In a larger project on the interrelationship of several groups of Caenogastropoda, each family or superfamily has been investigated. The main objective of this project is to provide morphological data for a phylogenetic analysis. The only phylogenetic study of the terebrids published to date is part of a larger analysis of the conoid (Taylor et al., 1993). The terebrids were represented in that study by seven species of Terebrinae and seven of Pervicaciinae. In the majority-rule (50%) consensus tree (Taylor et al., 1993:154)., 14 species are gathered in three terminal clades. The family itself has the following synapomorphies: (1) rhynchodeal