ChapterPDF Available

Distribution of Vegetation Types

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

This chapter presents an overview of the vegetation types of the Yucatán Peninsula. Mean annual precipitation, terrain and soil characteristics explain the large-scale distribution of forest types in the Yucatán Peninsula. Tropical (high) forest is found in areas with >800 mm of mean annual precipitation, while dry (low) tropical forest is distributed in areas with <800 mm of mean annual precipitation. Tropical forest has canopy heights of more than 30 m and mostly presents three well-defined vegetative strata. The distribution of tropical forest is mainly in the central, eastern and southern parts of the Yucatán Peninsula. Dry tropical forest has canopy heights up to 20 m, and is widely distributed in the Yucatán Peninsula in different successional stages. Other woody vegetation types include mangroves, petenes and pine savannas. Open vegetation types include coastal dunes, marsh, and savanna vegetation. Disturbed tropical and dry tropical forest of all successional stages covers more than 7.4 million ha at present, and requires detailed management plans to maintain future ecosystems benefits.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Chapter 3
Distribution of Vegetation Types
Gerald Alexander Islebe, Odil
on Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez,
Mirna Valde
´z-Herna
´ndez, and Holger Weissenberger
Abstract This chapter presents an overview of the vegetation types of the Yucata
´n
Peninsula. Mean annual precipitation, terrain and soil characteristics explain the
large-scale distribution of forest types in the Yucata
´n Peninsula. Tropical (high)
forest is found in areas with >800 mm of mean annual precipitation, while dry
(low) tropical forest is distributed in areas with <800 mm of mean annual precipi-
tation. Tropical forest has canopy heights of more than 30 m and mostly presents
three well-defined vegetative strata. The distribution of tropical forest is mainly in
the central, eastern and southern parts of the Yucata
´n Peninsula. Dry tropical forest
has canopy heights up to 20 m, and is widely distributed in the Yucata
´n Peninsula in
different successional stages. Other woody vegetation types include mangroves,
petenes and pine savannas. Open vegetation types include coastal dunes, marsh, and
savanna vegetation. Disturbed tropical and dry tropical forest of all successional
stages covers more than 7.4 million ha at present, and requires detailed manage-
ment plans to maintain future ecosystems benefits.
Keywords Tropical forest • Distribution • Precipitation • Succession •
Mangroves • Coastal dunes • Marsh vegetation
3.1 Introduction
Although the Yucata
´n Peninsula is characterized as an extensive limestone plateau
with no significant altitudinal variation, a relatively large number of vegetation types
can be identified. Vegetation types are mainly distributed along a north-to-south
G.A. Islebe (*) • M. Valde
´z-Herna
´ndez • H. Weissenberger
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur Unidad Chetumal, Avenida Centenario km 5.5, Apartado Postal
424, CP 77014 Chetumal, Quintana Roo, Mexico
e-mail: gislebe@ecosur.mx;mavaldez@ecosur.mx;hweissenberger@ecosur.mx
O. Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez
Universidad Veracruzana, Centro de Investigaciones Tropicales de la Universidad
Veracruzana, Ex Hacienda Lucas Martı
´n, Privada de Araucarias s/n, Col. Periodistas, 91019
Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
e-mail: sasodil@yahoo.com.mx
©Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
G.A. Islebe et al. (eds.), Biodiversity and Conservation of the Yucat
an Peninsula,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-06529-8_3
39
gradient of precipitation and according to different soil types, as well as precipitation
variability in an east to west direction (Miranda 1958; Wright 1967). Tropical forest
vegetation can be classified into two major groups with stand-specific associations,
namely high and low forest. Other forest types, like mangrove forest, are found
along coastal areas of the peninsula. Aquatic and subaquatic vegetation is present in
open seasonally flooded areas locally known as sabanas, swamps, lakes and other
water bodies.
The climate and hence the vegetation of the Yucata
´n Peninsula is determined by
a series of factors: the lack of major orographic variation, the Tropic of Cancer,
the influence of the Bermuda High, the presence of jet streams, tropical cyclones
during the rainy season, cold fronts during the winter months, and the presence of a
warm ocean current in the Yucata
´n Channel (Orellana et al. 2003). The driest region
is located in the northwestern Yucata
´n Peninsula, in the Sisal-Progreso region,
where mean annual precipitation is around 500 mm. The isohyet of 1000 mm runs
east to west from northern Campeche, Yucata
´n to northern Quintana Roo. Toward
the southern part of the Gulf of Mexico, precipitation increases rapidly up to
2000 mm; to the south of Quintana Roo, isohyets of around 1400 mm are found.
Most of the precipitation falls between May and November, while the period
between December and April is considered dry. Cold fronts between December
and February are locally known as nortes, and provide occasional winter
precipitation.
Tropical forest is found as the potential natural vegetation in areas
with >800 mm of annual precipitation, mainly in the central, eastern and southern
Yucata
´n Peninsula, in the states of Campeche and Quintana Roo. High forest as
a major vegetation type presents floristic and structural variations and covers
around 70 % of the peninsula before significant human-induced landscape trans-
formation, which began in the twentieth century (Rogan et al. 2011; Schmook
et al. 2011).
Tropical dry forest is generally found in areas with generally less than 800 mm
average precipitation, on a variety of soil types, including Gleysols to Vertisols, and
as a potential natural vegetation type, covers large parts of Quintana Roo, Campe-
che and Yucata
´n. A unique vegetation type is low flooded forest, covering
low-lying areas in Quintana Roo and Campeche. Species of this vegetation type
withstand several months of flooding, as well as dry conditions. Petenes, also a
unique vegetation type, are forest islands with fresh water inlets surrounded by
marsh vegetation.
Recent human impact has caused profound changes in vegetation (Rico-Gray
and Garcı
´a-Franco 1991) due to over-exploitation of timber species and changes in
land use (Rueda 2010; Snook and Negreros 2004). Many plant species have specific
ethnobotanical uses and values, ranging from medicinal to religious purposes
(Barrera 1962; La Torre-Cuadros and Islebe 2003; Andersen et al. 2005). The
Yucata
´n Peninsula is recognized to have an exceptional degree and detail of
traditional ecological knowledge and utilization of local plants.
40 G.A. Islebe et al.
3.2 Forest Types and Distribution
The first systematic descriptions of the vegetation of the Yucata
´n Peninsula are
provided by Miranda (1958), Miranda and Herna
´ndez-X (1964) and Barrera (1962).
Earlier work by Lundell (1934,1937) compiled botanical and ecological aspects of
the vegetation of northern Guatemala and the Yucata
´n Peninsula. The work of
Lundell was impressive, as he also included ethnobotanical and economic factors in
his reports, mainly from observations and data collection in Campeche, Yucata
´n
and the Pete
´n province of northern Guatemala. Lundells botanical collections can
be seen in Chicagos Field Museum of Natural History (http://collections.mnh.si.
edu/search/botany/). Lundell (1937) divided the vegetation in two categories,
upland and lowland, which correspond to specific soil characteristics. The upland
type included broad-leaved forest, also known as “high forest” or (seasonally)
evergreen tropical forest, the soils of which featured a distinct organic layer.
Lowland vegetation types were characterized by Lundell as forest with clayey
soils originating in erosion from the uplands. This vegetation type is locally
known as akalche´.
In the classic work “Vegetaci
on de Me
´xico”, Rzedowski (1978) described
species composition and physiognomy of the major vegetation types of the Yucata
´n
Peninsula. Other regional vegetation studies are from Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez and Islebe
(2002), analyzing plant communities along precipitation gradients, and Barber and
colleagues (1999), presenting phytosociological units. Ibarra-Manrı
´quez and
co-authors (1995) analyzed the phytogeographical relationships of the trees of the
Yucata
´n Peninsula and concluded that the strongest ecological and botanical
affinities exist with other Mesoamerican locations, while affinities with the Carib-
bean region are much weaker.
Distribution of vegetation types are presented in two maps (Figs. 3.1 and 3.2)
based on inventories carried out in 2009, 2010 and 2011 (Inegi 2013). Vegetation
types are separated on the two maps into forest (zonal) vegetation, and vegetation
related to water bodies (azonal). Area covered and geographical distribution is
given in Table 3.1. Disturbed dry tropical forest is the largest category with more
than 3.9 million ha, followed by disturbed tropical forest with over 3.5 million
ha. Following the data of Inegi, tropical and dry tropical forests together occupy
less than 240,000 ha. However, it should be noted that disturbed tropical and dry
tropical forests include all successional stages, from 5 to 30 or more years of age.
Vegetation related to water bodies with fluctuating water tables covers more than
2,474,244 ha in the Yucata
´n Peninsula. Most of these areas are covered by Typha-
and Cyperaceae-dominated swamps and disturbed low flooded forest. Mangrove
forests cover more than 400,000 ha along the coasts of the peninsula. However
increased deforestation rates of nearly 1 % per year (Hirales-Cota et al. 2010;
Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez et al. 2009), specifically along the Caribbean coast, are threaten-
ing this ecosystem.
3 Distribution of Vegetation Types 41
3.2.1 Tropical Forest
Tropical forest or high forest (Selva alta and selva mediana subperennifolia
in the Spanish literature) is widely distributed in the Yucata
´n Peninsula
Fig. 3.1 Distribution of main vegetation types
Fig. 3.2 Distribution of vegetation related to water bodies
42 G.A. Islebe et al.
(Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez 2000). This vegetation type is characterized by 25–50 % of the
trees composing the high forest losing their leaves during the dry season. Mean
annual precipitation values are above 1200 mm. Mean annual temperature in these
forests is above 20 C, while mean minimum annual temperatures are 11 C. Trees
have canopy heights of more 30 m and three well-defined strata can generally be
observed (Martı
´nez and Galindo-Leal 2002).
The dominant tree is Manilkara zapota (Sapotaceae), with a wide distribution in
southern Mexico, extending into northern Belize and Guatemala. Tropical forest is
common in southern-central Campeche and most parts of Quintana Roo. Character-
istic and commercially valuable canopy species include Swietenia macrophylla
(Meliaceae), Swartzia cubensis (Leguminosae), Pimenta dioica (Myrtaceae),
Aspidosperma megalocarpon (Apocynaceae), Caesalpinia gaumeri (Leguminosae),
among many others (Snook and Negreros-Castillo 2004). An upper shrub layer
consists mainly of the species Ficus spp. (Moraceae), Bursera simaruba
(Burseraceae), Sickingia salvadorensis (Rubiaceae), Chlorophora tinctoria
(Moraceae), Enterolobium cyclocarpum (Leguminosae), Sapindus saponaria
(Sapindaceae) and Acrocomia mexicana (Arecaceae). High forest consists of differ-
ent plant communities, in which Manilkara zapota-Coccothrinax readii is the
dominant (Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez and Islebe 2002).
Another widely distributed plant community of the high forest is Vitex gaumeri-
Caesalpinia gaumeri. This community has as characteristic species Acacia gaumeri
Table 3.1 Main vegetation types, land use and areas covered 2011
Main vegetation type and land use Cover (ha)
a
Distribution
Agriculture 724,880 PY
Human settlement 149,358 PY
Pastureland 1,561,832 N, C
Tropical forest 1,356,095 E, C, S
Disturbed tropical forest 3,638,819 E, C, S
Dry tropical forest 92,221 W, C, N, S
Disturbed dry tropical forest 3,907,388 W, C, N, S
Water bodies 286,045
Mangrove 400,124 E, N, W
Palm vegetation 6831 E
Typha-swamp vegetation 516,159 E, N, W
Low flooded forest 513,673 E, N, W
Disturbed low flooded forest 656,360 E, N, W
Coastal dune vegetation 8525 E, N, W
Halophytic vegetation 14,392 E, W
Tropical evergreen seasonal alluvial forest 57,176 E
Disturbed mangrove 15,673 E, N, W
Disturbed tropical evergreen seasonal alluvial forest 5339 E
Undefined vegetation types 500,000 PY
PY Yucata
´n Peninsula, NNorth, CCentral Yucata
´n Peninsula, EEast, SSouth, WWest
a
Cover of all data is based on Inegi (2013)
3 Distribution of Vegetation Types 43
(Leguminosae), Byrsonima bucidaefolia (Malphigiaceae), Alseis yucatanensis
(Rubiaceae), Spondias mombin (Anacardiaceae), Diospyros verae-crucis
(Ebenaceae) and Caesalpinia gaumeri (Leguminosae). An additional characteristic
feature of this plant community are the stone slabs, which can cover up to 45 % of
the soil surface (Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez and Islebe 2002). In southern Quintana Roo,
where the wettest conditions are found, the characteristic community is Trichilia
glabra-Brosimum alicastrum-Attalea cohune. This community is a dense forest
with the following characteristic subdominant species: Chrysophyllum mexicanum
(Sapotaceae), Piper sempervirens (Piperaceae), Chlorophora tinctorea (Moraceae),
and Swartzia cubensis (Leguminosea).
The Hampea trilobata-Metopium brownei-Bursera simaruba community is
widely distributed in the central Yucata
´n Peninsula and includes many character-
istic taxa of secondary forests (Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez and Islebe 2002) like Nectandra
coriacea (Lauraceae), Sabal yapa (Arecaceae), Bauhinia divaricata
(Leguminosea), Lysiloma latisiliquum (Leguminosae) and Bauhinia jenningsii
(Leguminosae).
Soils of the high forest are generally shallow, but rich in organic material and of
Lithosol-Rendzina or even Luvisol and Vertisol types (Flores 1977, FAO 1988;
Wright 1967), depending on the region. In the southern Yucata
´n Peninsula, soils are
mostly Vertisols, while in the central Yucata
´n Peninsula soils are of the Lithosol-
Rendzina type.
Climbers are common in these forests, and characteristic species are Paullina sp.
(Sapindaceae) and Cardiospermum corindum (Sapindaceae). At local terrain
depressions in high forests, pure stands of Attalea cohune (Arecaceae) can be
found (Quero 1992). These local vegetative communities consist of one distinctive
upper layer 20 m in height, and an understory herbaceous layer, typically with 90 %
cover. At similar conditions of deficient drainage, pure stands of Sabal
mauritiiformis (Arecaceae) can be found in southern Quintana Roo. These palm
communities have total heights of nearly 25 m. High forest has nearly disappeared
in the Yucata
´n Peninsula due to excessive timber extraction, cattle farming and
development of rice plantations in southern Quintana Roo over the last 50 years
(Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez et al. 2007; Turner et al. 2001). Old growth forest plots have
estimated values of 103.5 4.4 Mg ha
1
AGB (above ground biomass) (Urquiza-
Haas et al. 2007). However, higher values of 190 Mg ha
1
AGB are additionally
reported from the same authors (Urquiza-Haas et al. 2007). Basal area estimates of
tropical forest are highly variable: values between 11.9 and 45.0 m
2
ha
1
are
reported (Urquiza-Haas et al. 2007; Dickinson et al. 2000; Ceccon et al. 2002;
Gonza
´lez-Iturbe et al. 2002; Lawrence and Foster 2002; La Torre-Cuadros and
Islebe 2003; White and Hood 2004). Most likely, differences are due to the sampled
vegetation type and numerical methods applied.
Selva mediana subcaducifolia (semi-deciduous medium dry forest) can be found
in the states of Yucata
´n, Campeche and in some parts of northern Quintana Roo,
although much of its original vegetation has been removed, mostly for logging,
cattle and agriculture (Zamora-Crescencio et al. 2008). Canopy heights are usually
from 20 up to 35 m. Fifty to 75 % of all trees lose their leaves during the dry season.
44 G.A. Islebe et al.
Soils are shallow with rocky outcrops with a very thin organic upper layer, mostly
less than 7 cm (Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez and Islebe 2002). These soils are classified as
Lithosols and Luvisols (Zamora-Crescencio et al. 2008). Characteristic species
include Brosimum alicastrum (Moraceae), Vitex gaumeri (Verbenaceae),
Byrsonima (Malphigiaceae), Lysiloma latisiliquum, among others (Dzib-Castillo
et al. 2014; Zamora-Crescencio 2003). Epiphytes can be found in these forests.
3.2.2 Dry Forest
Low seasonally deciduous forest, or selva baja caducifolia in Spanish, has canopy
heights of less than 15 m, and occurs in areas with annual precipitation varying
between 600 and 800 mm or rarely more, located in the states of Yucata
´n,
Campeche and Quintana Roo. Nearly 100 % of tree species drop their leaves during
the dry season. Characteristic species are Lysiloma bahamensis (Leguminosae),
Baeucarnea pliabilis (Nolinaceae), Gymnopodium floribundum (Polygonaceae),
Cassia alata (Leguminosae), Acacia milleriana (Leguminosae), Mimosa
bahamensis (Leguminosae), Diospyros anisandra (Ebenaceae), Pseudophoenix
sargentii (Arecaceae) and Piscidia piscipula (Leguminosae) (Valdez-Herna
´ndez
et al. 2014). Those species can also grow directly on eroded limestone. On a
community level Sebastiania adenophora-Plumeria obtusa var.cericifolia-Agave
angustifolia was identified as dominant in the eastern Yucata
´n Peninsula (Sa
´nchez-
Sa
´nchez and Islebe 2002).
Seasonal flooded low forest (Selva baja inundable) occurs in areas that are
geographically similar to those of high forest (Miranda and Herna
´ndez 1964), but
is related to sabana areas. These forests are found in central and southern Quintana
Roo, as well as northern Campeche and Yucata
´n. Soils with poor drainage are
characteristic of these dry forests, and soils can withstand high water levels during
long periods. The areas of low drainage are locally known as akalche´s, which are
periodically flooded during the rainy season. Several tree species can be found, the
most conspicuous being Byrsonima crassifolia (Malphigiaceae), Chrysobalanus
icaco (Sapotaceae), Curatella americana (Dilleniaceae), Crescentia cujete
(Bignoniaceae) and Hyperbaena winzerlingii (Menispermaceae) (Corte
´s-Castela
´n
and Islebe 2002;Dı
´az-Gallegos et al. 2002). Canopy heights rarely surpass 10 m.
Some of those low forests can form pure stands, as in the case of Haematoxylon
campechianum (Fabaceae) (common name tasistal), Bucidas buceras
(Combretaceae) (common name pukte) and Metopium brownei (Anacardiaceae)
(Miranda and Herna
´ndez 1964). There is no distinctive herbaceous layer present,
mainly due to the prevalence of seasonal flooding. If undergrowth is present,
species belonging to the Poaceae and Cyperaceae families can be found, like
Eleocharis. Epiphytes of Orchidaceae and Piperaceae are quite common, such as
Encyclia alata, Peperomia spp., and climbers belonging to Dahlbergia
(Leguminosae). Deforestation rates for low forest have been estimated around
1.2 % per year in Calakmul for the last 30 years (Schmook et al. 2011).
3 Distribution of Vegetation Types 45
In the northwestern part of the peninsula seasonally dry tropical forest (low
deciduous forest) with columnar cacti can be found (Miranda and Herna
´ndez 1964).
It is restricted to areas of 600–800 mm of annual precipitation, with no precipitation
occurring during a 7- to 8-month period. The presence of rocky areas is conspi-
cuous, and the soils are described as Lithosols (Thien et al. 1982). Characteristic
endemic species of this vegetation type are: Mammillaria gaumeri,Beaucarnea
pliabilis,Guaiacum sanctum,Pilosocereus gaumeri,Nopalea gaumeri,Nopalea
inaperta and Pterocereus gaumeri.
3.2.3 Mangrove Vegetation
Mangroves can be found along the entire coast of the Yucata
´n Peninsula. Four
mangrove species are distributed within different types of vegetative association:
Rhizophoramangle (Rhizophoraceae), Conocarpus erectus (Combretaceae),
Avicennia germinans (Acanthaceae), and Laguncularia racemosa (Combretaceae).
R. mangle forests form nearly pure stands along the coast, while A. germinans and
L. racemosa are found in mixed stands depending on the degree of soil salinity
(Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez et al. 1991). The same authors distinguish four different man-
grove communities. C. erectus is distributed on higher grounds with Gleysols, and
can withstand variation in water table depths. Canopy heights of mangrove forests
do not surpass 6–12 m, and consist of one predominant tree layer. The edges of
mangrove areas are mostly dominated by Acrostichum danaeifolium (Pteridophyta),
Bravaisia tubiflora (Acanthaceae), Cladium jamaicensis and other Cyperaceae
(Islebe and Sa
´nchez 2002; Torrescano-Valle and Islebe 2012). In southern Quintana
Roo, dwarf Rhizophora mangle stands can be found with heights of only up to 1 m
(Valde
´z-Hernandez and Islebe 2011). Soils of mangrove communities are mostly
sandy with clayey material, but can develop deep organic horizons.
3.2.4 Peten Vegetation
Peten vegetation is unique to the Yucata
´n Peninsula. It takes the form of closed
woody vegetation islands consisting of a mosaic of mangroves and tropical forest
species surrounded by salt marshes and mangroves (Dura
´n1987). Mangrove
species can occasionally be found mixed with common tropical forest tree species.
The most prominent and largest petenes are those of the biosphere reserve Los
Petenes in Campeche, but these formations are also present on a smaller scale in the
eastern part of Quintana Roo (Sian Kaan Biosphere). Canopy heights may reach
12 m. Soils are rich in organic material, deep and slightly saline. Characteristic
species are Conocarpus erectus (Combretaceae), Metopium brownei
(Anacardiaceae), Thrinax radiata (Arecaceae), Bucida buceras (Combretaceae),
H. campechianum (Leguminosae), among others.
46 G.A. Islebe et al.
3.3 Open Vegetation Types
Open vegetation types, including sabana, marsh and coastal dune vegetation are
well defined and widely distributed in the Yucata
´n Peninsula. The coastal dune type
is found along the shoreline of the Yucata
´n Peninsula (Espejel 1984,1986,1987;
Moreno-Casasola and Espejel 1986; Flores and Espejel 1986; Torres et al 2010),
and coastal plant communities are distributed along distinctive ecological gradi-
ents, such as salinity (Islebe, unpublished). Espejel (1987) identified 237 species for
coastal dunes, and cosmopolitan families like Poaceae, Asteraceae and
Leguminosae are the most common. Low non-woody plants (<30 cm high) like
Ambrosia hispida (Asteraceae), Canavalia rosea (Leguminosae), Distichlis spicata
(Poaceae), Ipomoea pes-caprae (Convolvulaceae), Suriana maritima (Surianaceae)
and Ernodea littoralis (Rubiaceae), among other species, are found close to the sea.
A transition occurs to higher elevation plant communities with woody taxa like
Coccoloba uviferae (Polygonaceae), Pouteria campechana (Sapotaceae), Cordia
sebestena (Boraginaceae) and Chrysobalanus icaco (Chrysobalanaceae). Woody
taxa reach up to 6 m high, and sometimes a low shrub layer is present (Sa
´nchez-
Sa
´nchez et al. 1991). Plant species from coastal dunes show typical morphological
adaptations such as thicker leaves and glandules (like S. maritima and E. littoralis).
Altitudinal differences between the highest and lowest parts of the dune along
the coasts of Quintana Roo averages 5 m. Near-shore vegetation includes creeping
species like I. pres-caprae, while dunes with woody taxa show the development
of early shallow soil formation with thin organic layers. Coastal dunes are one of
the most threatened vegetation types of the Yucata
´n Peninsula, with less than
8500 ha remaining, as coastal dunes are used to build hotels and tourism infra-
structure (Lapointe 2011). Coastal dune vegetation is mostly delimited by the
presence of Thrinax radiata palm vegetation, or by swamp like vegetation with
abundant Cyperaceae and a transition to tropical forest types. Marsh vegetation is
influenced by a high level of carbonate dissolved in water and soil, and is relatively
species-poor relative to its biogeographical position. Typha dominguensis, Cyperus
jamaicensis, Scirpus and Carex spp. are the main taxa found in marsh environ-
ments and are locally named tulares or popales. Marsh vegetation is mainly
distributed along the eastern and western margins of the peninsula, though marshes
cover large areas of the northern Yum Balam reserve. Their floristic composition is
determined by nutrient availability, phosphate limitation, and the influence of
salinity. T. dominguensis dominates in nutrient-rich conditions (Rejmankova
et al. 1996).
In southern Quintana Roo and reaching further into Belize and parts of Guate-
mala, relic Pinus caribaea forest can be found (Macario-Mendoza et al. 1998). It is
an open savanna-like vegetation type on sandy soils, with taxa from the Poaceae
dominating the herbaceous layer. Following Chavelas (1981) it is the only pine
species occurring at sea level in Mesoamerica, with an original distribution running
from the Yucata
´n Peninsula through Belize to Nicaragua, along coastal areas.
3 Distribution of Vegetation Types 47
3.4 Human and Natural Impact
Human impact on the vegetation of the region has occurred over the last four millennia
(Rico-Gray and Garcı
´a-Franco 1991;Islebeetal.1996). The earliest corn cultivation
in the Yucata
´n Peninsula and its subsequent impact on vegetation is recorded from
2000 BC on (Arag
on-Moreno et al. 2012; Carrillo-Bastos et al. 2010;Torrescano-
Valle and Islebe 2015), although it could date back as much as 5000 years, as evidence
from Northern Belize suggests. The use of agroforestry is part of ancient Mayan
culturalknowledge and is well established among present-day farmers (Barrera 1962).
The sustainable use of natural resources has been documented in many ethnobotanical
studies (Barrera 1962;Andersenetal.2005). Forest sustainability is incorporated into
agroforestry practices like shifting cultivation, depending on the crops and areas
cultivated, as well as cultivation intensity (Schmook et al. 2011; Valdez-Herna
´ndez
et al. 2014). Fire is an important factor, and has been used since early Maya culture to
clear land (Islebe et al. 1996). For the last 4000 years, and until the present day it is,
intentionally or unintentionally, used to modify the landscape at different scales
(L
opez-Portillo et al. 1990). According to soil and paleoecological data from central
Peten in northern Guatemala, full recovery of tropical forest vegetation from fire can
take up to 80 years (Mu
¨ller et al. 2010). However, using physiognomic criteria and
plant species composition data, secondary vegetation cannot be distinguished from
primary vegetation after 30 years (Miranda 1958;Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez and Islebe 2002).
Traditional Mayan nomenclature makes no linguistic distinction between secondary
vegetation of more than 30 years and primary forest (Barrera et al. 1976), but the first
seral stages are well defined in traditional ecological knowledge (Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez
et al. 2007). Conversely, Lawrence and Foster (2002) report that biomass from
25 year old secondary forests was only 40 % that of mature forests.
Hurricanes as natural hazards are a major determinant of forest structure in the
Yucata
´n Peninsula (Tanner et al. 1991;Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez and Islebe 1999; Ramı
´rez-
Barajas et al. 2012; Rogan et al. 2011; Vandecar et al. 2011). The coastal and
immediate interior vegetation of Quintana Roo is especially vulnerable to hurricanes
as natural disturbances, since coral reefs and mangroves are severely affected and
reduced in geographical extent. Hurricane damage to vegetation includes tree
snapping (complete or partial, by branches), uprooting, defoliation, tree mortality,
strong flooding and eventually, weeks after the event, intensive fires, due to the high
quantities of accumulated woody and foliar debris on the ground (L
opez-Portillo
et al. 1990; Rodrı
´guez-Trejo et al. 2011). During the last century, more than
100 hurricanes have hit the coast of Quintana Roo and the Yucata
´n Peninsula,
damaging mangroves and other forest types (Islebe et al. 2009). The hurricanes
causing the most severe damage were Gilbert in 1989 (Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez and Islebe
1999), Isidor in 2003, Emily in 2005 and Hurricane Dean (Islebe et al. 2009;
Ramı
´rez-Barajas et al. 2012), which damaged more than 2 million ha of forests in
2007 (CONAFOR, Ramı
´rez-Barajas et al. 2012). For a high forest in northern
Quintana Roo, Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez and Islebe (1999) estimated 4.5 t/ha of fallen
biomass during Hurricane Gilbert. For more details, please see Chaps. 6and 7.
48 G.A. Islebe et al.
3.5 Floristic Diversity
Floristic lists of the Yucata
´n Peninsula include the works of Standley (1930),
Cabrera and Sousa (1983) for Quintana Roo, Sosa and colleagues (1985), Duran
and co-authors (1998), Martı
´nez and Galindo-Leal (2002), Gutierrez-Baez (2003)
for Campeche, and Carnevali and co-authors (2010). The latter authors recognize
some 3000 taxa. Some checklists on a local or regional scale are available, e.g., for
the El Eden reserve in northern Quintana Roo, see Schultz (2005) and for Cozumel,
Te
´llez and Cabrera (1987). Endemic species of the Yucata
´n Peninsula are listed in
Dura
´n and colleagues (1998), which follows Ibarra-Manrı
´quez and co-authors
(1995) in summing up 54 species, most of them with Caribbean phytogeographical
affinities.
More than 500 tree species have been identified for the Yucata
´n Peninsula
(based on the CIQRO-Herbarium data base, 2015). The most species-rich woody
families are Leguminosae, Euphorbiaceae and Rubiaceae. Including all plant life
forms, Fabaceae, Poaceae, Asteraceae and Orchidaceae (Carnevali et al. 2010) are
the most represented families. The genera with most species are Ipomoea, Croton,
Euphorbia and Cyperus, following Carnevali and colleagues (2010).
3.6 Outlook for Future Vegetation Studies
Given the threat to all vegetation types, several actions should be taken to preserve
large connected forest tracts, specifically in the core conservation areas of
Calakmul, central Quintana Roo, Campeche and the Sian Kaan Biosphere reserve.
Conservation efforts are being made to guarantee genetic connectivity and habitat
range for biodiversity, such as the biological corridor of Sian Kaan-Calakmul. The
effectiveness of these efforts must be analyzed in future years, as the areas
containing this corridor are also used for the construction of roads and rural
infrastructure. Floristic and structural parameters should be monitored; forests
should be locally recognized as ecosystem service providers to boost local income;
and plant demographic studies should be undertaken to establish scientifically
based rules for long term sustainable timber extraction (Valdez-Herna
´ndez
et al. 2014). Scientific knowledge of natural succession should be included in
management plans to avoid excessive unnecessary exploitation of major timber
species with specific basal area parameters. The last 30 years of history has shown
that the ejido (communally owned land) system has worked well (Porter-Bolland
et al. 2013), though not perfectly, to guarantee the conservation of major forest
tracts on a large regional scale in the central and southern Yucata
´n Peninsula.
Although most of the remaining forests are secondary, at different successional
stages, they cover more than 3.5 million ha, and still harbor a high and valuable
degree of biodiversity (Ramı
´rez-Barajas et al. 2012) and supply rural communities
with income and use-value (Rico-Gray and Garcı
´a-Franco 1991). The following
3 Distribution of Vegetation Types 49
research should be encouraged in the future: understanding the succession of the
different vegetation types; improvement and application of restoration ecology;
accurate and precise assessment of the carbon stocks of distinct forest types; and the
eco-physiology of characteristic tree species of Yucata
´n forests. In the case of
mangrove forests, some species are currently protected by national laws. Continu-
ous development of the tourism industry along coastal areas makes effective
conservation almost impossible, however, as ecosystem functioning is altered
with the construction of roads, drainage and other infrastructure.
Acknowledgments We are grateful to the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologı
´a (Conacyt)
for funding our projects and to El Colegio de la Frontera Sur for access to all facilities provided
over the years.
References
Anderson EN, Canul JC, Dzib A, Flores SG, Islebe GA, Medina Tzuc F, Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez O,
Valdez P. Las plantas de los Mayas. Etnobota
´nica en Quintana Roo, Me
´xico. Conabio and
Ecosur; 2005.
Arago
´n-Moreno AA, Islebe GA, Torrescano-Valle N. A ~3800-yr, high-resolution record of
vegetation and climate change on the north coast of the Yucata
´n Peninsula. Rev Palaeobot
Palynol. 2012;178:35–42.
Barber A, Tun J, Crespo MB. A new approach of the bioclimatology and potential vegetation of
the Yucata
´n Peninsula, Mexico. Phytocoenologia. 1999;31:1–31.
Barrera A. La Penı
´nsula de Yucata
´n como provincia bi
otica. Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de
Historia Natural. 1962;23:71–105.
Barrera AM, Barrera A, L
opez F. Nomenclatura Etnobota
´nica Maya. Colecci
on cientı
´fica INAH,
Me
´xico; 1976.
Cabrera E, Sousa M. Listado florı
´stico preliminar: 25–50. In: Sian Kaan. Puerto Morelos, Q.Roo:
CIQRO. SEDUE; 1983.
Carnevali Ferna
´ndez-Concha G, Tapia Mu~
noz JL, Duno de Stefano R, Ramı
´rez Morillo
IM. Flora ilustrada de la penı
´nsula de Yucata
´n. CICY. 2010.
Carrillo-Bastos A, Islebe GA, Torrescano Valle N. Holocene vegetation and climate history of
central Quintana Roo, Yucata
´n Penı
´nsula, Mexico. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2010;160:189–96.
Ceccon E, Olmsted I, Vazquez-Yanes C, Campo J. Vegetation and soil properties in two tropical
dry forests of differing regeneration status in Yucata
´n. Agrociencia. 2002;36:621–31.
Chavelas PJ. El Pinus caribaea Morelet en el estado de Quintana Roo, Me
´xico. INIF-SARH,
Me
´xico. Nota Te
´cnica No. 10, 7; 1981.
Corte
´s-Castela
´n JC, Islebe GA. Influencia de factores ambientales en la distribuci
on de especies
arb
oreas en las selvas del sureste de Me
´xico. Rev Biol Trop. 2002;53:115–33.
´az-Gallegos J, Castillo-Acosta Y, Garcı
´a-Gil G. Distribuci
on espacial y estructura arb
orea de la
selva baja subperennifolia en un Ejido de la Reserva de la Biosfera Calakmul, Campeche,
Me
´xico. Universidad y Ciencia. 2002;35:11–27.
Dickinson MB, Whigham DF, Hermann SM. Tree regeneration in felling and natural treefall
disturbances in a semideciduous tropical forest in Mexico. Forest Ecol Manage. 2000;134:
137–51.
Dura
´n R. Descripci
on y ana
´lisis de la estructura y composici
on de la vegetaci
on de los petenes del
Noroeste de Campeche, Me
´xico. Bi
otica. 1987;12:181–98.
Dura
´n R, Trejo-Torres JC, Ibarra-Manrı
´quez G. Endemic phytotaxa of the Peninsula of Yucata
´n.
Harv Pap Bot. 1998;3:263–314.
50 G.A. Islebe et al.
Dzib-Castillo B, Chanata
´sig-Vaca C, Gonza
´lez-Valdivia NA. Structure and composition of
two tree communities of tropical deciduous and subdeciduous forests in Campeche, Mexico.
Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 2014;85:167–78.
Espejel I. La vegetaci
on de las dunas costeras de la Penı
´nsula de Yucata
´n. I. Norte de Yucata
´n.
Biotica. 1984;9:183–210.
Espejel I. La vegetaci
on de las dunas costeras de la Penı
´nsula de Yucata
´n, II. Sian Ka
´an. Quintana
Koo, Me
´xico. Biotica. 1986;11:7–24.
Espejel I. Phytogeographic relationships of the Yucata
´n Peninsula. J Biogeogr. 1987;14:499–519.
FAO. Soil map of the world with revised legend. World Soil Resources Report 60. Rome: FAO;
1988.
Flores JS, Espejel I. Etnoflora Yucata
´nense. Mapa de la Vegetaci
on de la Penı
´nsula de Yucata
´n.
2. Xalapa, Me
´xico: INIREB; 1986.
Flores DA. Los suelos de la Penı
´nsula de Yucata
´n y sus posibilidades agropecuarias. Reuni
on
nacional de reconstrucci
on de la infraestructura agrı
´cola. Me
´rida, Me
´xico: Secretarı
´ade
Agricultura y Recursos Hidra
´ulicos; 1977.
Gonza
´lez-Iturbe JA, Olmsted I, Tun-Dzul FA. Tropical dry forest recovery after long term
Henequen (sisal, Agave fourcroydes Lem.) plantation in northern Yucata
´n, Mexico. For Ecol
Manag. 2002;167:67–82.
Gutierrez-Baez C. Listado florı
´stico actualizado de Campeche. RN/C/09; 2003.
Hirales-Cota M, Espinoza-Avalos J, Schmook B, Ruiz-Luna A, Ramos-Reyes R. Agentes de
deforestaci
on de manglar en Mahahual-Xcalak, Quintana Roo, sureste de Me
´xico. Ciencias
marinas. 2010;36:147–59.
Ibarra-Manrı
´quez G, Villase~
nor JL, Dura
´n R. Riqueza de especies y endemismo del componente
arb
oreo de la Penı
´nsula de Yucata
´n, Me
´xico. Bol Sociedad Bot Me
´xico. 1995;57:49–77.
Inegi. Uso de suelo y vegetaci
on, Serie V., Escala 1:250,000. Mexico. 2013.
Islebe GA, Sa
´nchez O. History of late Holocene vegetation at Quintana Roo, Mexico. Plant Ecol.
2002;160:187–92.
Islebe GA, Hooghiemstra H, Brenner M, Hodell DA, Curtis JA. A Holocene vegetation history
from lowland Guatemala. The Holocene. 1996;6:265–71.
Islebe GA, Torrescano-Valle N, Valdez-Herna
´ndez M, Tuz-Novelo M, Weissenberger H.
Efectos del impacto del huraca
´n Dean en la vegetaci
on del sureste de Quintana Roo. Me
´xico:
Foresta Veracruzana. 2009;11:1–6.
Lapointe P. Le tourisme de nature :un moyen de conserver le
´cosyste
`me co
ˆtier de la Costa Maya.
Master thesis. University of Sherbrooke. 2011.
La Torre-Cuadros MD, Islebe GA. Traditional ecological knowledge and use of vegetation in
southeastern Mexico: a case study from Solferino, Quintana Roo. Biodivers Conserv. 2003;12:
2455–76.
Lawrence D, Foster D. Changes in forest biomass, litter dynamics and soils following
shifting cultivation in southern Mexico: an overview. Interciencia. 2002;27:400–8.
L
opez-Portillo J, Keyes MR, Gonza
´lez A, Cano EC, Sa
´nchez O. Los incendios de Quintana Roo:
cata
´strofe ecol
ogica o evento peri
odico? Ciencia y Desarrollo. 1990;91:43–57.
Lundell CL. Preliminary sketch of the phytogeography of the Yucata
´n Peninsula. Contrib Am
Archaeol. 1934;12:257–21.
Lundell CL. The vegetation of Pete
´n, Publ. 478. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution; 1937.
Macario-Mendoza PA, Torres-Pech SA, Cabrera Cano EG. Estructura y Composici
on de una
Comunidad con Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis (Se
´necl.) Barr. y Golf., en el Estado de
Quintana Roo, Me
´xico. Caribb J Sci. 1998;34:50–7.
Martı
´nez E, Galindo-Leal C. La vegetaci
on de Calakmul, Me
´xico: clasificaci
on, descripci
on y
distribuci
on. Bol Soc Bot Me
´x. 2002;71:7–32.
Miranda F. Estudios acerca de la vegetaci
on. In: Los recursos naturales del sureste y su
aprovechamiento. II parte. Imernat. 1958.
Miranda F, Herna
´ndez XE. Los tipos de vegetaci
on de Me
´xico y su clasificaci
on. Bol Soc Bot
Me
´x. 1964;28:29–179.
3 Distribution of Vegetation Types 51
Moreno-Casasola P, Espejel I. Classification and ordination of coastal dune vegetation along the
Gulf and Caribbean Sea of Mexico. Vegetatio. 1986;66:147–82.
Mu
¨ller AD, Islebe GA, Anselmetti FS, Ariztegui D, Brenner M, Hodell DA, Hajdas I, Hamann Y,
Haug GH, Kennett DJ. Recovery of the forest ecosystem in the tropical lowlands of
northern Guatemala after disintegration of Classic Maya polities. Geology. 2010;38(6):523–6.
Orellana R, Islebe GA, Espadas C. Presente, pasado y futuro de los climas de la penı
´nsula de
Yucata
´n. In: Colunga-Garcı
´a Marı
´n P, Larque
´-Saavedra A, editors. Naturaleza y sociedad en el
a
´rea maya. Mexico: Amc&CICY; 2003.
Porter-Bolland L, Garcı
´a-Frapolli E, Sa
´nchez-Gonzale
´z MC. Local perceptions of conservation
initiatives in the Calakmul region. In: Porter-Bolland L et al., editors. Community action for
conservation: Mexican experiences. New York, NY: Springer; 2013.
Quero H. Las palmas silvestres de la penı
´nsula de Yucata
´n. Publ. No. 10. Mexico: UNAM,
Instituto de Biologı
´a; 1992.
Ramı
´rez-Barajas P, Islebe GA, Calme S. Impact of hurricane Dean (2007) on game species of the
Selva Maya, Mexico. Biotropica. 2012;44:402–11.
Rejmankova E, Pope KO, Post R, Maltby E. Herbaceous Wetlands of the Yucata
´n Peninsula:
Communities at Extreme Ends of Environmental Gradients. Int Revue ges Hydrobiol Hydrogr.
1996;81:223–52. doi:10.1002/iroh.19960810208.
Rico-Gray V, Garcı
´a-Franco G. The Maya and the vegetation of the Yucata
´n Peninsula.
J Ethnobiol. 1991;11:135–42.
Rodrı
´guez-Trejo DA, Tchikoue H, Cı
´ntora-Gonza
´lez C, Contreras-Aguado R, Rosa-Va
´zquez
A. Modelaje del peligro de incendio forestal en las zonas afectadas por el huraca
´n Dean.
Agrociencia. 2011;45(5):593–608.
Rogan J, Schneider L, Christman Z, Millones M, Lawrence D, Schmook B. Hurricane disturbance
mapping using MODIS EVI data in the southeastern Yucata
´n, Mexico. Remote Sens Lett.
2011;2:259–67.
Rueda X. Understanding deforestation in the southern Yucata
´n: insights from a sub–regional,
multi–temporal analysis. Reg Environ Chang. 2010;10:175–89.
Rzedowski J. Vegetaci
on de Me
´xico. Ed. Limusa., Mexico City. 1978.
Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez O. Ana
´lisis estructural de la selva del jardı
´n bota
´nico. In: y Sa
´nchez O,
Islebe GA, editors. El Jardı
´n Bota
´nico Dr Alfredo Barrera Marı
´n, fundamento y estudios
particulares. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur and CONABIO. 2000.
Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez O, Cabrera-Cano E, Torres-Pech S, Herrera-Escudero P, Serralta-Peraza L,
Salazar-G
omez C. Vegetaci
on. In: Camarena-Luhrs T, Salazar-Vallejo S, editors. Estudios
ecol
ogicos preliminares de la zona sur de Quintana Roo. CIQRO. 1991.
Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez O, Islebe GA. Hurricane Gilbert and structural changes in a tropical forest of
south-eastern Mexico. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 1999;8:29–38.
Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez O, Islebe GA. Tropical forest communities of southeastern Mexico. Plant Ecol.
2002;158:183–200.
Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez O, Islebe GA, Valde
´z-Herna
´ndez M. Flora arb
orea y caracterizaci
on de gremios
ecol
ogicos en distintos estados sucesionales de la selva mediana de Quintana Roo.
Foresta Veracruzana. 2007;9:17–26.
Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez O, Islebe GA, Valdez-Herna
´ndez M. Vegetaci
on costera del Santuario del
Manatı
´, In Espinoza-Avalos J, Islebe GA, Herna
´ndez-Arana H, editors. El sistema ecol
ogico
de la bahı
´a de Chetumal/Corozal: costa occidental del Mar. ECOSUR. 2009.
Schmook B, Dickson RP, Sangermano F, Vadjunec JM, Eastman JR, Rogan J. A step-wise land-
cover classification of the tropical forests of the Southern Yucata
´n, Mexico. Int J Remote Sens.
2011;32:1139–64.
Schultz GP. Vascular flora of the El Eden Ecological Reserve, Quintana Roo, Mexico. J Torrey
Bot Soc. 2005;132:311–22.
Snook LK, Negreros-Castillo P. Regenerating mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King) on clear-
ings in Mexicos Maya forest: the effects of clearing method and cleaning on seedling survival
and growth. Forest Ecol Manage. 2004;189:143–60.
52 G.A. Islebe et al.
Sosa V, Flores JS, Rico-Gray V, Lira R, Ortiz JJ. Lista florı
´stica y sinonimia maya.
Etnoflora Yucata
´nense. 1985;1:1–225.
Standley PC. Flora of Yucata
´n. Chicago, IL: Field Museum of Natural History; 1930.
Tanner EVJ, Kapos V, Healey JR. Hurricane effects on forest ecosystems in the Caribbean.
Biotropica. 1991;23:513–21.
Te
´llez O, Cabrera EF. Fl
orula de la Isla de Cozumel. Listados florı
´sticos de Me
´xico. 1987;6:1–34.
Thien L, Bradburn AS, Welden AL. The woody vegetation of Dzibilchaltun. A Mayan archaeo-
logical site in Northwest Yucata
´n, Mexico. Middle Am Res Inst Occasional Pap. 1982;5:1–24.
Torres W, Me
´ndez M, Dorantes A, Dura
´n R. Estructura, composici
on y diversidad del matorral de
duna costera en el litoral yucateco. Bol Soc Bot Me
´x. 2010;86:37–51.
Torrescano-Valle N, Islebe GA. Mangroves of Southeastern Mexico: palaeoecology and conser-
vation. Open Geogr J. 2012;5:6–15.
Torrescano-Valle N, Islebe GA. Holocene paleoecology, climate history and human influence in
the southwestern Yucata
´n Peninsula. Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 2015;217:1–8.
Turner II BL, Villar SC, Foster D, Geoghegan J, Keys E, Klepeis P, Lawrence D, Mendoza PM,
Manson S, Ogneva-Himmelberger Y, Plotkin AB, Perez Salicrup D, Chowdhury RR,
Savitsky B, Schneider L, Schmook B, Vance C. Deforestation in the Southern Yucata
´n
Peninsular Region: an integrative approach. Forest Ecol Manage. 2001;154:353–70.
Urquiza-Haas T, Dolman PM, Peres CA. Regional scale variation in forest structure and biomass
in the Yucata
´n Peninsula, Mexico: effects of forest disturbance. Forest Ecol Manage.
2007;247:80–90.
Valdez-Herna
´ndez M, Islebe GA. Tipos de vegetacio
´n de Quintana Roo. In: Pozo C, editor.
Riqueza biolo
´gica de Quintana Roo. Un ana
´lisis para su conservacio
´n, Tomo 2. Mexico:
Ecosur and Conabio; 2011. p. 32–6.
Valdez-Herna
´ndez M, Sa
´nchez-Sa
´nchez O, Islebe GA, Snook L, Negreiros-Castillo P. Recovery
and early succession after experimental disturbance in a seasonally dry tropical forest in
Mexico. Forest Ecol Manage. 2014;334:331–43.
Vandecar KL, Lawrence D, Richards D, Schneider L, Rogan J, Schmook B, Wilbur H. High
mortality for rare species following hurricane disturbance in the Southern Yucata
´n. Biotropica.
2011;43:676–84. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00756.x.
White DA, Hood CS. Vegetation patterns and environmental gradients in tropical dry forests of the
Northern Yucata
´n Peninsula. J Veg Sci. 2004;15:151–60. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.
tb02250.x.
Wright ACS. El reconocimiento de los suelos en la Penı
´nsula de Yucata
´n, Me
´xico. Informe final.
FAO. 1967.
Zamora-Crescencio P. Contribuci
on al estudio florı
´stico y descripci
on de la vegetaci
on del
municipio de Tenabo, Campeche, Me
´xico. Polibota
´nica. 2003;15:1–40.
Zamora-Crescencio P, Garcia-Gil G, Flores-Guido SF, Ortiz JJ. Estructura y composici
on
florı
´stica de la selva mediana subcaducifolia en el sur del Estado de Yucata
´n. Polibota
´nica.
2008;26:39–66.
3 Distribution of Vegetation Types 53
... According to the classification of Miranda and Hernandez-X [45], the dominant vegetation type is tropical dry forest. However, anthropogenic activities such as cattle raising, agriculture, open-pit mining, and the growth of the urban patch modified the vegetation matrix of the tropical dry forest towards secondary succession with different ages of abandonment [46]. ...
... Regarding the vegetation outside the urban zone, different density and coverage conditions were observed (NDVI: 0.6-1) in a clear gradient of vegetation degradation that decreases with distance to the urban zone, similar to an edge effect. Finally, the correlation observed between cover classes and NDVI values in this study is in agreement with that found by Ferreira and Duarte [71] in shrub and bush species, suggesting that most of the vegetation is deciduous [46]. ...
... The obtained results confirm the importance of green and treed areas, natural or artificial, to help reduce the temperature of the surface and the air [46,78], an issue of great relevance for a region with dry subhumid climate, such as Mérida [40], where the average annual temperature is 46 °C in the dry season, and 34 °C in the wet season. ...
Article
Full-text available
Climate change has severe consequences on ecosystem processes, as well as on people's quality of life. It has been suggested that the loss of vegetation cover increases the land surface temperature (LST) due to modifications in biogeochemical patterns, generating a phenomenon known as "urban heat island" (UHI). The aim of this work was to analyze the effects of urban land-cover changes on the spatiotemporal variation of surface temperature in the tropical city of Mérida, Mexico. To find these effects we used both detected land-cover changes as well as variations of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Mérida is ranked worldwide as one of the best cities to live due to its quality of life. Data from satellite images of Landsat were analyzed to calculate land use change (LUC), LST, and NDVI. LST increased ca. 4 °C in the dry season and 3 °C in the wet season because of the LUC. In addition, a positive relationship between the LST and the NDVI was observed mainly in the dry season. The results confirm an increase in the LST as a consequence of the loss of vegetation cover, which favors the urban heat island phenomenon.
... The Yucatán Peninsula corresponds to the Maya tectonic block (Gutiérrez-García & Vázquez-Domínguez, 2012), had a cratonic character during the Paleozoic, was largely emergent until the Triassic-Jurassic, and was invaded by seas during the Upper Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous (López-Ramos, 1975;Maya-Martínez et al., 2011;Suárez-Morales, 2003;Vázquez-Domínguez & Arita, 2010). The vegetation of the peninsula is tropical, with a few forest types, being predominant the mediumstature semi-evergreen and semi-deciduous forests, and also with palm groves, coastal mangroves, flooded forests, grasslands, and wetlands (Durán-García et al., 2017;Islebe et al., 2015). Some biogeographic analyses have indicated biotic relationships of the Yucatán Peninsula with the Antilles (Chiappy-Jhones et al., 2001;Suárez-Morales & Reid, 2003;Trejo-Torres & Ackerman, 2001), whereas other studies have indicated a stronger affinity with northern Central America and southeastern Mexico (Aguilar-Aguilar et al., 2003;Duno-de Stefano et al., 2012;Durán et al., 1998;Echeverry & Morrone, 2013;Escalante et al., 2003;Estrada-Lorea, 1991;Ibarra-Manríquez et al., The objective is to review the names applied to the different biotic units in the Yucatán Peninsula and to produce a unified regionalization, providing the appropriate names and listing their synonyms. ...
... https: //doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2024.95.5278 When analyzing the units recognized by different authors within the Yucatán Peninsula province (e.g., Lundell, 1934 Dinerstein et al. (1995) and are clearly characterized by their vegetation (Islebe et al., 2015). Thus, a consensus regionalization may be achieved by recognizing these ecoregions as districts (Fig. 9). ...
Article
The biogeographic regionalization of the Yucatán Peninsula is examined critically. The proliferation of the names assigned to different biotic units (e.g., Yucatán Peninsula, Yucatán, Yucatanan, Yucatecan, Petén, Petén-Yucatán, Campeche, Campechean, El Petén, and Campechean-Petén) is analyzed, and different problems identified. A unified area-taxonomy is proposed recognizing 3 units: the Yucatán Peninsula province Goldman and Moore, 1945, the Yucatecan district Smith, 1941, stat. nov., and the Petén district Smith, 1941. Smaller biotic units recognized by previous authors that may eventually be considered subdistricts cannot be diagnosed by sets of endemic species, so they are treated as synonyms of the 2 districts recognized in the present proposal.
... mm per year, with rains occurring from May to November (García 2004). The city has developed within a tropical dry forest (Miranda and Hernández-X 1963), but anthropogenic activities have modified the original vegetation matrix into different secondary succession stages (Islebe et al. 2015). Current vegetation of the urban area of Merida is today constituted by both native species (corresponding to a tropical dry forest and others found in the Yucatan Peninsula) and introduced species (Pérez-Medina and López-Falfán 2015; Ayuntamiento de Mérida 2017). ...
Article
Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) are the group of insects, with great significance for the medical area that colonize different anthropogenic environments. This study reports the diversity of mosquitoes from four urban parks: Acuaparque (AP), Parque Ecológico del Poniente (PEP), Parque Ecológico Metropolitano del Sur (PEM) and Parque Zoológico del Centenario (PZC) in the city of Merida, Yucatan, located in southern Mexico. Mosquito larvae were collected by direct inspection from breeding sites and adult specimens were collected using CDC Backpack aspirators and Mosquito-Magnet® traps. A total of 349 specimens of 6 genera and 14 species were collected and identified. Aedes aegypti, Culex coronator, Culex nigripalpus, Culex interrogator, Aedes taeniorhynchus, Culex quinquefasciatus and Culex salinarius were the most abundant and widely distributed species. The highest numbers of species registered were 12 and 11 (for AP and PEP parks, respectively), and similar species composition. The results show that recreational parks can harbor various species of mosquitoes, including some of public health importance.
... This salinity difference among ecotypes is common as hydro-edaphic conditions drive soil spatiotemporal patterns (Castañeda-Moya et al., 2006;Larcher et al., 2016;Naidoo, 2016;Zhao et al., 2020). Moreover, the inland forest is a type of wetland (i.e., "Peten" forest; López-Portillo et al., 1989;Islebe et al., 2015) located in higher elevation areas relative to sea level and where groundwater inputs control the hydroperiod due to its development on top of limestone platforms across the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico (Fleury et al., 2007;Bauer-Gottwein et al., 2011;Twilley et al., 2018). In contrast to other mangrove ecotypes, a Peten can be found up to 10 km inland from the coastline where water infiltrates the karstic/carbonate ground and flows from inland point-sources to the coastline where salinity values are low (< 15 PSU) (e.g., Zaldivar-Jimenez et al., 2010;Stalker et al., 2014). ...
Article
Full-text available
Mangroves sustain high soil accretion and carbon sequestration rates, yet it is still unknown if they can keep pace with increasing sea level rise (SLR) across a wider range of coastal geomorphic settings. Because accretion rates are controlled by mineral sediment inputs and organic matter accumulation, it is paramount to assess the relative contribution of root productivity to soil formation. Here, we evaluated root biomass, production, and turnover in three mangrove ecotypes to evaluate the role of soil nutrient limitation, stressors, and hydroperiod in controlling root dynamics in San Andres Island (SAI), a karstic oceanic island in the Caribbean Sea. Root production was modulated by soil stress conditions and not by nutrient availability as it has been reported for other karstic environments. The lowest root biomass allocation, and both production and turnover of fine roots were measured under low flooding duration, and low salinity (<20 PSU) and sulfide concentrations (0.84 ± 0.4 mM). Yet, when soil stress conditions increased during high flooding duration (6207 h y–1) and low oxygen conditions (Eh), root tissues reached the highest biomass and production values, including a relative fast turnover of fine roots (<2 mm; 0.75 y–1). Our results follow the predictions of the plant root longevity cost-benefit hypothesis where plants maintain roots only until the efficiency of resource acquisition is maximized by water and nutrient acquisition. Because of the importance of groundwater in controlling porewater salinity and mangrove root productivity in karstic oceanic islands such as SAI, water use and coastal development should be regulated in the short term to avoid the loss of mangrove area and concomitant ecosystem services.
... Sandy beaches represent around 286 km (86%) of coastline in the State of Yucatán. These beaches are critical habitats for shorebirds (Arturo Lopez et al., 1989), turtles (Cuevas et al., 2010), as well as dune vegetation along the entire coast (Espejel, 1984;Islebe et al., 2015). They also support diverse touristic activities, especially important for the local economy (Meyer-Arendt, 2001;Cuevas Jiménez et al., 2016). ...
Article
Full-text available
The biodiversity of the coastal ecosystems in the Gulf of Mexico is threatened by anthropogenic activities of various kinds. The predominant portion of the land-sea margin in the State of Yucatán consists of exposed sandy beaches. This ecosystem is threatened by several activities that vary in spatial scales, at a local: cargo/fishing ports, touristic facilities, maritime traffic, and domestic pollution; and at a larger scale: the forthcoming development of the oil industry. In the absence of information about the biodiversity of the beaches of Yucatán, we implement the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON) Pole to Pole sampling protocol to (1) Quantify the spatial patterns of diversity of macrofauna along the beaches; (2) quantify current levels of pollution by hydrocarbons (aromatic and aliphatic); (3) estimate sampling effort for future environmental impact assessments. During November 2018, six localities along the coastline of Yucatán State were sampled following a spatial hierarchical design that included three sites at each locality, and 9–18 core samples in the intertidal strata of each site. As a result, 31 species of invertebrates were registered. The patterns of distribution and abundance of species showed that there was a base community structure along the entire coast dominated by four species. In general, the density of species was relatively low (2–4 species/0.01 m³) and the density of individuals was high (20–200 ind./0.01 m³). The beta diversity was higher between localities with good environmental health, but the estimated alpha diversities did not show a pattern regarding the health of the coast. Lastly, the overall number of species reported suggest that gamma diversity of the macrofauna in the beaches of Yucatán is within the highest known worldwide. Levels of hydrocarbons detected in this study are exceptionally low compared to those reported for other coastal areas of the Gulf of Mexico and are several orders of magnitude lower than those considered as lower-threshold values for marine sediments. The biological and chemical patterns reported here indicated that it is an appropriate moment to start long-term monitoring. The sampling design we suggest is based on statistical precision and internationally recognized protocols for assessment of marine diversity on sandy beaches.
Article
Full-text available
A new clown beetle species, Bacanius neoponerae , is described from Mexican nests of the arboreal ponerine ant Neoponera villosa found in the tank bromeliad Aechmea bracteata . Adult beetles were found in brood chambers or inner refuse piles, but also outside the ant nests, in decaying organic matter between the bromeliad leaves. No direct interactions between ants and microhisterid beetles could be observed. Several lines of evidence suggest a close relationship either with the ants, specific microhabitats within the ant nests or the bromeliads. Sample site elevation, colony size, monthly rainfall and collecting site were the main variables predicting the association. Almost half of the N. villosa colonies were associated with the microhisterids, and larger colonies favored their presence , especially during the driest months of the year. Two specimens were found in a nest of another ant species, Camponotus atriceps, also inhabiting A. bracteata . The new species is the seventh of the genus Bacanius reported from Mexico. This is the second time a species of this genus is associated with ants, and the fourth record of a histerid beetle cohabiting with ponerine ants. The small size of these beetles and their very protective body structure may facilitate their cohabitation with such aggressive hosts.
Article
Apiculture is an important economic activity in Mexico, and deforestation, extensive agriculture, and other types of land use threaten sustainable honey production. This study aimed to determine the floral resources used by Apis mellifera for honey production, in vegetation types with different disturbance degrees in Southern Yucatan Peninsula, Quintana Roo state. A total of 24 honey samples, from eight apiaries, were collected during the months of the highest honey production in the region (February to May 2022). Standard acetolysis technique was applied for melissopalynological analysis. A total of 68 pollen types were identified. Our results suggest that the disturbance degree of the vegetation does not affect the pollen diversity and honey composition, mainly because the available floral resources remain similar. Viguiera dentata (Asteraceae) was the most abundant (>45%) herbaceous species in honey samples of February and March. Piscidia piscipula (Fabaceae) and Haematoxylum campechianum (Fabaceae) in samples of March (16%-45%), and P. piscipula in April (>45%). Spondias mombin (Anacardiaceae), Bursera simaruba (Burseraceae), and Metopium brownie (Anacardiaceae) were the most abundant (16%-45%) arboreal species found in samples of May. Although our results can be used to develop conservation strategies looking for sustainable honey production, further studies should focus on vegetation with a better conservation state, during longer time periods, and during periods with fewer resources available for honeybees.
Article
Coccinellids are important predators and provide important ecosystem services. The coccinellid fauna, drivers of assemblage composition, and species richness in the tropics are poorly known. We studied changes in species composition of coccinellids in domestic gardens along a rural‐urban gradient in southeastern Mexico and identified the local and landscape variables that determine abundance and species richness. We surveyed coccinellids through monthly visual surveys, yellow sticky and pan traps in nine domestic gardens, and measured local variables (flower and prey abundance, plant diversity, garden size, temperature, and relative humidity), and gathered information on landscape heterogeneity in buffers around gardens (0.05 km, 1 km, and 3 km radius). We collected 40 coccinellid morphospecies, including two exotic species: Chilocorus nigrita and Delphastus catalinae . Coccinellid species composition differed along the gradient. Assemblages did not exhibit a nested pattern; species turnover was the main contributor of observed beta diversity. Overall coccinellid abundance was highest in the suburban zone, while overall species richness was highest in the rural zone. Mean abundance and mean species richness did not vary significantly along the gradient. The gradient negatively affected coccinellid diversity; diversity was highest in the rural zone which harbored several exclusive species. At the local scale, coccinellid abundance and species richness correlated positively with prey abundance and temperature, and negatively with plant diversity. Urbanization filtered more than half the species in the community, yet urban gardens in southeastern Quintana Roo, especially those providing abundant prey, might assist coccinellid conservation. Abstract in Spanish is available with online material
Article
Full-text available
McDonald HG 2021. Yukon to the Yucatan: Habitat partitioning in North American Late Pleistocene ground sloths (Xenarthra, Pilosa). Journal of Palaeosciences 70(2021): 237-251. The late Pleistocene mammalian fauna of North America included seven genera of ground sloth, representing four families. This cohort of megaherbivores had an extensive geographic range in North America from the Yukon in Canada to the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico and inhabited a variety of biomes. Within this latitudinal range there are taxa with a distribution limited to temperate latitudes while others have a distribution restricted to tropical latitudes. Some taxa are better documented than others and more is known about their palaeoecology and habitat preferences, while our knowledge of the palaeoecology of taxa more recently discovered remains limited. In order to better understand what aspects of their palaeoecology allowed their dispersal from South America, long-term success in North America and ultimately the underlying causes for their extinction at the end of the Pleistocene more information is needed. A summary overview of the differences in the palaeoecology of the late Pleistocene sloths in North America and their preferred habitats is presented based on different data sources.
Article
Full-text available
RESUMEN La fractura hidráulica o fracking es una técnica que permite la extracción de gas y petróleo del subsuelo en yacimientos no convencionales. Sin embargo, esta extracción genera impactos negativos en los ecosistemas. Por esta razón, se aborda la contaminación que genera esta técnica y sus afectaciones a nivel de paisaje en tres posibles escenarios, así como la aclimatación y posibles respuestas de las especies vegetales. ABSTRACT Hydraulic fracturing or fracking is a technique that allows the extraction of gas and oil from the subsoil in unconventional deposits. However, this extraction generates negative impacts on ecosystems. For this reason , the contamination generated by this technique and its effects at the landscape level are addressed in three possible scenarios , as well as the acclimatization and possible responses of plant species.
Chapter
Full-text available
Se describen los tipos de vegetación del Santuario del Manatí. Éstos incluyen manglares, matorrales costeros, selva baja inundable, tasistales, tulares, carrizales y la selva mediana subperennifolia. Se mencionan las especies más características de cada tipo de vegetación y su diagnóstico correspondiente.
Article
Full-text available
Based on exhaustive studies of herbarium specimens held at the National Herbarium of Mexico (MEXU), as well as of the literature, an updated list of the native species of trees of the Mexican portion of the Yucatan Peninsula is provided (Campeche, Quintana Roo y Yucatan). For each species the state(s) in which it occurs is cited. The list includes 437 species belonging to 246 genera and 68 families. An appendix listing 376 excluded species, including 68 of dubious occurrence in the peninsula is provided, clarifying the reason for their exclusion as members of the flora of the Peninsula. The richest families are Mimosaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Rubiaceae, and Myrtaceae; the richest genera are Acacia, Eugenia, Coccoloba, Croton and Lonchocarpus. The percentage of endemism is around 12.3% (54 taxa in 26 families); the families with more endemic species are Cactaceae, Fabaceae, Mimosaceae, Polygonaceae and Rubiaceae. At the state level, Quintana Roo harbors the most species (351). The use of five different similarity coefficients (Braun-Blanquet, Dice, Drive & Kroeber, Jaccard and Simpson) to analyze both the total number of species and the endemic ones, supports the idea of considering the states as part of the same floristic province. Finally, the need to intensify the floristic and taxonomic work, aimed at evaluating in the near future more properly the floristic richness in the Peninsula is pointed out. This will allow a more precise definition of its floristic subdivisions, its degree of endemism and its floristic relationships with neighbouring regions.
Book
This book provides an in-depth analysis on community conservation in Mexico. The volume explores vivid examples and case studies that illustrate some of the critical issues at stake, including the participation of local communities in national and global conservation, indigenous and local perceptions of conservation initiatives in Southern Mexico, and challenges in ICCA governance and ecotourism. The book also reviews methodological approaches for understanding and strengthening community conservation, touching upon such topics as community-based biodiversity monitoring and tools for understanding children's perceptions of community conservation. Written by international experts in the field, Community Action for Conservation: Mexican Experiences is a lively and deep-running resource that offers invaluable stories and analyses of the Mexican experience with conservation.
Article
Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis, a species naturally distributed in lowlands of Central America, was recorded for Mexico in 1981 in the Caobas "ejido", Quintana Roo. The vegetation type is "selva baja" and savanna. Vegetation was sampled using a 5m × 120m plot (600m2) where all individuals ≥1cm in DBH (diameter at breast height, 1.3m) were measured. Individuals smaller than 1cm in DBH where sampled in two 5m × 1m subplots (10m2) within the large plot. Height and mortality were also recorded. Fifty-nine species belonging to 40 plant families were recorded. Thirty species had DBH ≥1cm, while the remaining 29 were shrubs, herbs, epiphytes, and vines. Four strata were distinguished: The first of two arboreal strata was composed of pine trees measuring 8 to 18m in height. The second arboreal stratum forms a canopy between 4 and 7m and is composed of the typical species found in "selva baja" and savanna. A shrub layer between 2 and 3.5m of height, was composed mainly by individuals of the same species as the previous stratum, but in different development stages. The final stratum (<1.8m of height) was composed of herbs, sedges, grasses, and individuals of the same species as the previous stratum but in different development stages.