Technical ReportPDF Available

Rhabdovirus carpio

Authors:
11/23/2015 FactSheetRhabdoviruscarpio
https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/greatlakes/FactSheet.aspx?SpeciesID=2725&Potential=N&Type=0&HUCNumber=DGreatLakes 1/5
Home | Staff | Status | Search | Report | Projects | Prevention | Glossary | Links | Kids
Rhabdoviruscarpio
CommonName:Springviremiaofcarp(SVC)
SynonymsandOtherNames:
Springviremiaofcarp,SVC,SVCV
AndyGoodwin,UAPBAquaculture/FisheriesCenter
AndyGoodwin,UAPBAquaculture/FisheriesCenter
Identification:SpringviremiaofcarpisaviraldiseasecausedbyRhabdoviruscarpio,abulletshapedRNAvirus.
ThisvirusisamemberofthefamilyRhabdoviridaeandhasbeententativelyplacedinthegenusVesiculovirus.
Describedassystemicandacute,thisdiseaseishighlycontagious.Externally,SVCisidentifiedbybulgingeyes,
skinhemorrhages,bloatedappearance,adarkeningoftheskin,andventprotrusion.Internally,fluidsbuildupin
allorgansandthebodycavityoftheinfectedfishandtherearehemorrhagesintheswimbladderaswellas
inflamedintestines.Fishinfectedwiththediseasemayappearlethargic,haveslowedrespiration,andhavealoss
ofequilibrium.Thoughmostprevalentincommoncarp,othermembersoftheFamilyCyprinidae(minnowfamily)
andpossiblynorthernpikearesusceptible.
Size:
NativeRange:FirstdiagnosedinYugoslavia,RhabdoviruscarpiohasbeenidentifiedinEurope,Russiaandthe
MiddleEast.
11/23/2015 FactSheetRhabdoviruscarpio
https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/greatlakes/FactSheet.aspx?SpeciesID=2725&Potential=N&Type=0&HUCNumber=DGreatLakes 2/5
ThismaponlydepictsGreatLakesintroductions.
ClickhereforGreatLakesregioncollectioninformation
NonindigenousOccurrences:ThefirstoccurrenceofthisdiseaseintheUnitedStateswasfromcultivatedfishin
NorthCarolinainspring2002(Goodwin2002).Thatsameyear,SVCvwasisolatedfromcommoncarpinCalumet
SagChannel,IllinoisandCedarLake,Wisconsin(CFSPH2007,Dikkeboom2004).Subsequentoccurrenceshave
beenreportedinOhio,MinnehahaCreek,Minnesota,Missouri,andWashington.Additionally,SVCvhasbeen
reportedinHamiltonHarbor,Ontario,Canada(CFSPH2007,Ciprianoetal.2011,Garveretal.2007,MDNR
2012).
Ecology:SVCusuallyoccursinthespringwherewatertemperaturesarelessthan18°C.Infectedfishshedthis
virusthroughfecesandpossiblythroughurineandgillmucus.Thevirusentersfishthroughthegillsorcanenter
throughparasites,suchasthecarplouseortheleech.Alternatively,thevirushasalsobeenfoundinovarian
fluids,makingtransmittalthoughreproductionapotential,however,studiesamongfryandfingerlingfishhave
shownalackofoutbreaks.
MeansofIntroduction:Firstdescribedina1971diagnosisinYugoslavia,thisdiseasehasalsobeenidentifiedin
Europe,RussiaandtheMiddleEast.In2002,RhabdoviruscarpiowasfirstreportedinU.S.watersataNorth
Carolinakoihatchery.Unfortunately,thereisevidencethatkoihadbeendistributedfromthishatcherytomostof
the48contiguousstatesbeforebeingconfirmedwithSVC.Thefirstcommoncarpdieoffofwildfishthattested
positiveforSVCoccurredin2002atCedarLake,Wisconsin.In2004,theviruswasfoundincommoncarpfrom
MissouriandWashington.PerhapsmostthreateningtoIndiana,theviruswasfoundincommoncarpcaughtfrom
theCalSagChannelnearCalumet,Illinoisin2003.Whiletherewasnocarpmortalityobserved,thefishwere
carriersofRhabdoviruscarpio.ThiswaterwayisjustafewmilesfromextremenorthwestIndiana.Infectedcarp
arefreetoswimfromtheCalSagChannel,intoLakeMichigan,andfinallyenterIndiana’stributariesofLake
Michigan.
Status:Introducedandestablished
GreatLakesImpacts:
RhabdoviruscarpiohasahighenvironmentalimpactintheGreatLakes.
Realized:
Overall,R.carpioiscurrentlynotbelievedtobeasignificantprobleminNorthAmerica(Ciprianoetal.
2011).GreatLakesnativespeciessusceptibletoinfectionbyR.carpioincludeemeraldshiner(Notropis
atherinoides),largemouthbass(Micropterussalmoides),andbluegill(Lepomismacrochirus)(Ciprianoetal.
2011).Experimentalinfectionshavebeenreportedinnorthernpike(Esoxlucius),pumpkinseed(Lepomis
gibbosus),goldenshiner(Notemigonuscrysoleucas),andperch(FamilyPercidae)(CFSPH2007).
Until2011,whentwofishtestedpositiveforSVCvfollowingadieoffof200300carpinMinnehahaCreek,
Minnesota(GLFHC2012),SVCvhadnotbeenimplicatedindieoffsofnativeornonnativespeciesinthe
GreatLakes,norhadtherebeenreportsofthevirusincommercialaquaculturesince2003(Ciprianoetal.
2011).ItshouldbenotedthatChryseobacteriumandAeromonashydrophilagroup2wereisolatedfromthe
kidneysandAcinetobacterbaumanniicalcoaceticuswasisolatedfromtheeyesofthosefish,aswell(GLFHC
2012).
11/23/2015 FactSheetRhabdoviruscarpio
https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/greatlakes/FactSheet.aspx?SpeciesID=2725&Potential=N&Type=0&HUCNumber=DGreatLakes 3/5
SymptomsofSVCincludeexophthalmia,darkenedcoloration,anemia,andhemorrhageinthegills,skin,and
eyes(Fijan1999,Fijanetal.1971).Becauseofthis,infectedfishmaybemoresusceptibletopredation
(LaffertyandMorris1996).However,cascadingfoodwebeffectshavenotbeenreportedasaresultofSVC
infectionintheGreatLakes.
Potential:
SVCislistedasaWorldOrganizationforAnimalHealth(OIE)reportablediseaseforaquaticanimals(OIE
2012)andisalsolistedasareportablediseaseinCanada(CFIA2012).Assuch,itisautomaticallyassessed
ashavingahighenvironmentalimpactintheGreatLakesregion.
ThereislittleornoevidencetosupportthatRhabdoviruscarpiohassignificantsocioeconomic
impactsintheGreatLakes.
Potential:
SVCvhasbeenreportedfromakoiproductionfacilityinNorthCarolina(Goodwin2003)andacommercial
fishpondinMissouri(Cipriano2011),followingfishmortality.Ithasalsobeenresponsibleformortality
relatedlossesofaquaculturedfishinEurope(Goodwin2009).
Thevirushasalsobeendetectedinrainbowtrout(Oncorhynchusmykiss)(Svetlana2006).However,nosuch
infectionshavebeenrealizedintheGreatLakes.
ThereislittleornoevidencetosupportthatRhabdoviruscarpiohassignificantbeneficialeffectsin
theGreatLakes.
Realized:
Rhabdoviruscarpioprimarilyinfectscommoncarp(Cyprinuscarpio),koicarp(Cyprinuscarpiokoi),grass
carp(Ctenopharyngodonidella),silvercarp(Hypophthalamicthysmolitrix),bigheadcarp(H.nobilis),and
goldfish(Carassiusauratus)(CFSPH2007,OIE2009).SVCvwasimplicatedinthedeathofmorethan1,500
carpinCedarLake,Wisconsin(Dikkeboometal.2004).However,theoverallimpactontheGreatLakes
commoncarppopulationisminimal.
Management:
Regulations(pertainingtotheGreatLakes)
Importationoflivefish,fertilizedeggs,andgametesofSVCsusceptiblespeciesincludingcommoncarp(Cyprinus
carpio),koi(C.carpiokoi),grasscarp(Ctenopharyngodonidella),silvercarp(Hypophthalamicthysmolitrix),
bigheadcarp(Aristicthysnobilis),cruciancarp(Carassiuscarassius),goldfish(Carassiusauratus),tench(Tinca
tinca),orfe(Leuciscusidus),andsheatfish(Silurusglanis)ispermitted,providedtheyareaccompaniedbyaUSDA
importpermitandaveterinaryhealthcertificate(USDAandAPHIS2012).
Note:Checkfederal,state/provincial,andlocalregulationsforthemostuptodateinformation.
Control
Biological
SinglestrandedanddoublestrandedRNAinjectionscanprovideRhabdoviruscarpioprotectionforuptothree
weeks(Alikenetal.1996,Masytechevaetal.1995).
Physical
Establishmentofquarantines,culling,andstockdensityreductionduringthewinterandspringarebeneficial
managementpracticestopreventthespreadofSVCv(CFPHS2007).RhabdoviruscarpioisinactivatedbyUV
irradiation(254nm),gammairradiation(103krads),heatingto60°C(140°F)for30minutes,andexposuretopH
12for10minutes,orpH3for3hours(CFSPH2007,OIE2009).
Chemical
DisinfectionoffacilitiesandequipmentwillpreventthespreadofSVCvinaquaculture(CFPHS2007).Rhabdovirus
carpioissusceptibletooxidizingagentslikesodiumdodecylsulphate,nonionicdetergents,andlipidsolvents.The
virusisinactivatedbyformalin(3%)forfiveminutes,chlorine(500ppm),iodine(0.01%),NaOH(2%)forten
minutes,banzalkoniumchloride(100ppmfor20minutes),alkyltoluene(350ppmfor20minutes),chlorhexidine
gluconate(100ppmfor20minutes),andcresol(200ppmfor20minutes)(AhneandHeld1980,Ahne1982,CFSPH
2007,Fijan1999,Kiryu2007).MethisoprinolmaybeusefulbyinhibitingreplicationofSVCvinvitro.Furthertesting
undercultureconditionsisnecessary(Siwichekietal2003).
Note:Checkstate/provincialandlocalregulationsforthemostuptodateinformationregardingpermitsforcontrol
methods.Followalllabelinstructions.
Remarks:Currently,novaccinationexistsforSVC,sothebestmethodforpreventingthespreadofthisdiseaseis
avoidance.Commercialfarmscanusespring,wellorotherdiseasefreewatertopreventexposurerisks.Also,
eggsandequipmentmaybedisinfectedandproperdisposalmethodsmaybeemployedtolessentheriskof
exposure.YoucanalsohelpbypracticingafewgoodtechniquesforstoppingthespreadofSVCandotheraquatic
invasivespecies.
11/23/2015 FactSheetRhabdoviruscarpio
https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/greatlakes/FactSheet.aspx?SpeciesID=2725&Potential=N&Type=0&HUCNumber=DGreatLakes 4/5
References:(clickforfullreferences)
Ahne,W.1982.VergleichendeUntersuchungenüberdieStabilitätvonvierfischpathogenenViren(VHSV,PFR,
SVCV,IPNV).JournalofVeterinaryMedicineSeriesB29:457476.
Ahne,W.,andC.Held.1980.UntersuchungenüberdieviruzideWirkungvonActomar®K30auffischpathogene
Viren.TierärztlichUmschau35:308318.
Aliken,Y.S.,I.S.Shchelkunovis,T.I.Shchelkunovis,O.A.Kupinskaya,V.I.Masycheva,V.P.Klimenko,andV.A.
Fadina.1996.ProphylactictreatmentofviraldiseasesinfishusingnativeRNAlinkedtosolubleandcorpuscular
carriers.JournalofFishBiology49:195205.
CenterforFoodSecurityandPublicHealth(CFSPH).2007.Springviremiaofcarp.IowaStateUniversity.
http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/Factsheets/pdfs/spring_viremia_of_carp.pdf.Accessed14June2012.
Cipriano,R.C.,P.R.Bowser,A.Dove,A.Goodwin,andC.Puzach.2011.Prominentemergingdiseaseswithinthe
UnitedStates.InR.C.Cipriano,A.W.Bruckner,&I.S.Shchelkunov(Eds.),BridgingAmericaandRussiawith
SharedPerspectivesonAquaticAnimalHealth(pp.617).ProceedingsoftheThirdBilateralConferencebetween
RussiaandtheUnitedStates,1220July,2009,heldinShepherdstown,WestVirginia.Landover,Maryland,USA.
KhaledbinSultanLivingOceansFoundation.Available
http://www.lsc.usgs.gov/files/Cipriano%20et%20al%202011.pdf.Accessed14June2012.
Dikkeboom,A.L.,C.Radi,K.TooheyKurth,S.Marcquenski,M.Engel,A.E.Goodwin,K.Way,D.M.Stone,andC.
Longshaw.2004.Firstreportofspringviremiaofcarpvirus(SVCV)inwildcommoncarpinNorthAmerica.Journal
ofAquaticAnimalHealth16:169178.
GreatLakesfishHealthcommittee(GLFHC).2012.AnnualAgencyReports.43pp.
Fijan,N.1999.Springviraemiaofcarpandotherviraldiseasesandagentsofwarmwaterfish.Pp.177–244in
P.T.K.WooandD.W.Bruno(eds.),FishDiseasesandDisorders3:Viral,bacterialandfungalinfections.CAB
International,NewYork,USA.
Fijan,N.,Z.Petrinec,D.Sulimanovic,andL.Zwillenberg.1971.Isolationoftheviralcausativeagentfromthe
acuteformofinfectiousdropsyofcarp,VeterinarskiArhiv.41:125138.
Garver,K.A.,A.G.Dwilow,J.Riachard,T.F.Booth,D.R.Beniac,andB.W.Souter.2007.Firstdetectionand
confirmationofspringviraemiaofcarpvirusincommoncarp,CyprinuscarpioL.,fromHamiltonHarbour,Lake
Ontario,Canada.JournalofFishDiseases30(11):665671.
Goodwin,A.2003.Differentialdiagnosis:SVCvs.KHVinkoi.AmericanFisheriesSocietyFishHealthSectionFish
HealthNewsletter31(1):913.
Goodwin,A.E.2009.SpringViremiaofCarpVirus(SVCV):Globalstatusofoutbreaks,diagnosis,surveillance,and
research.TheIsraeliJournalofAquaculture61(3):180187.
Kiryu,I.,T.Sakai,J.Kurita,andT.Iida.2007.Virucidaleffectofdisinfectantsonspringviremiaofcarpvirus.Fish
Pathology42:111–113.
Lafferty,K.D.,andA.K.Morris.1996.Alteredbehaviorofparasitizedkillifishincreasessusceptibilitytopredation
bybirdfinalhosts.Ecology77(5):13901397.
Masycheva,V.I.,Y.S.Aliken,V.P.Klimenko,V.A.Fadina,I.S.Shchelkunovis,T.I.Shchelkunovis,andO.A.
Kupinskaya.1995.ComparativeantiviraleffectsofdsRNAonlowerandhighervertebrates.VeterinaryResearch
26:536–538.
MinnesotaDepartmentofNaturalResources(MDNR).2012.SpecialNotice:SVCfoundinMinnehahaCreek
(Minneapolis,MN).http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/fish_diseases/svc.html.Accessed14June2012.
Plumb,J.A.AGuidetotheIntegratedManagementofWarmwaterandCoolwaterFishDiseasesintheGreatLakes
Basin.2002.6163.
Siwicki,A.K.,F.Pozet,M.Morand,B.Kazun,S.Trapkowsa,andJ.Malaczewsa.2003.Influenceofmethisoprinolon
thereplicationofrhabdovirusesisolatedfromcarp(Cyprinuscarpio)andcatfish(Ictalurusmelas):invitrostudy.
PolishJournalofVeterinaryScience6:4750.
Svetlana,J.,V.Ivetic,andV.Radosavijevic.2006.).Rhabdoviruscarpioasacausativeagentofdiseasein
rainbowtrout(OncorhynchusmykissWalbaum).ActaVeterinariaBeograd56:553–558.
UnitedStatesDepartmentofAgricultureandAnimalandplantHealthInspectionService(USDAandAPHIS).2012.
Importandexport.http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/animals/animal_import/marine_import_fish.shtml.
11/23/2015 FactSheetRhabdoviruscarpio
https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/greatlakes/FactSheet.aspx?SpeciesID=2725&Potential=N&Type=0&HUCNumber=DGreatLakes 5/5
Accessed5July2012.
WilhelmSchäperclaus,HugoKulow,KurtSchreckenbach.1992.FishDiseases.CRCPress.1398pp.
WorldOrganizationforAnimalHealth(OIE).2009.ManualofDiagnosticTestsforAquaticAnimals:SpringViremia
ofCarp.Chapter2.3.8.http://www.oie.int/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/aahm/2010/2.3.08_SVC.pdf.
Accessed14June2012.
WorldOrganizationforAnimalHealth(OIE).2012.OIEListedDiseases.http://www.oie.int/animalhealthinthe
world/oielisteddiseases2012.Accessed10June2012.
OtherResources:
DNR,IN.2005.http://www.in.gov/dnr/files/SPRING_VIREMIA_OF_CARP.pdf
BarbaraD.Petty,AllenC.Riggs,RuthEllenKlinger,RoyP.E.YanongandRuthFrancisFloyd(UniversityofFlorida
IFASExtension).SpringViremiaofCarp.Accessedon
12/17/08.http://www.aces.edu/dept/fisheries/education/ras/publications/Update/Spring%20Viremia%20of%20Carp.pdf
http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/Factsheets/pdfs/spring_viremia_of_carp.pdf
Author:Cao,L.A.K.Bogdanoff,andA.Fusaro.
ContributingAgencies:
 
RevisionDate:8/17/2012
Citationforthisinformation:
RhabdoviruscarpioUSGSNonindigenousAquaticSpeciesDatabase,Gainesville,FL,andNOAAGreatLakesAquatic
NonindigenousSpeciesInformationSystem,AnnArbor,MI.
<https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/greatlakes/FactSheet.aspx?
SpeciesID=2725&Potential=N&Type=0&HUCNumber=DGreatLakes>RevisionDate:8/17/2012
Thisinformationispreliminaryorprovisionalandissubjecttorevision.Itisbeingprovidedtomeettheneedfor
timelybestscience.TheinformationhasnotreceivedfinalapprovalbytheU.S.GeologicalSurvey(USGS)andis
providedontheconditionthatneithertheUSGSnortheU.S.Governmentshallbeheldliableforanydamages
resultingfromtheauthorizedorunauthorizeduseoftheinformation.
GLERL4840S .StateR d.,AnnA rbor,MI481089719(734)7412235
LakeMichiganFieldS tation,1431Be achS t.,Muskegon,MI494411098(231)7597824
NOAA|DOC
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
The spring viremia of carp virus (SVCV) is an OIE-listed rhabodovirus historically responsible for losses of cultured fish in Europe. Acute disease is associated with high mortality, especially in common carp Cyprinus carpio during their first spring season when water temperatures are 10-15°C. Mortality has been reported in other cyprinids and in the Wels catfish Siluris glanis. The disease is characterized by hemorrhages on the skin and bloody mucus in the intestine, clinical signs shared by other diseases including bacterial infections. In 2002, SVCV was detected on a large koi farm in the USA. The USA isolate was 98% identical to isolates associated with koi and goldfish imported from China, but distantly related to European strains. In spring 2002, a major SVCV kill of common carp occurred in Cedar Lake, Wisconsin. This isolate was also of the Asian type, as were subsequent isolates from wild and cultured fish in several states. In the USA, all infected farmed populations were destroyed and no additional isolates have been detected since 2004. One of the most critical aspects of SVCV diagnosis is to differentiate the disease from the koi herpesvirus (KHV). The most obvious difference is that KHV generally occurs in tem- peratures of 20-28°C while SVCV disease occurs below 18oC and commonly at 10-15°C.
Article
Full-text available
Parasites that are transmitted from prey to predator are often associated with altered prey behavior. Although many concur that behavior modification is a parasite strategy that facilitates transmission by making parasitized prey easier for predators to capture, there is little evidence from field experiments. We observed that conspicuous behaviors exhibited by killifish (Fundulus parvipinnis) were associated with parasitism by larval trematodes. A field experiment indicated that parasitized fish were substantially more susceptible to predation by final host birds. These results support the behavior-modification hypothesis and emphasize the importance of parasites for predator-prey interactions.
Article
Full-text available
High mortality of 1-year old rainbow trout occurred on a fish farm in the spring season, with clinical symptoms typical for acute septicemia. Histological examination revealed inflammatory changes and necrosis of the internal organs. The causative agent was isolated on RTG-2 and EPC cell lines and identified by serum neutralisation, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunofluorescence (IFAT) as Rhabdovirus carpio. Experimental infection using the virus isolated from rainbow trout caused disease in carp fry, as well. This is the first case of disease of rainbow trout caused by Rhabdovirus carpio, and the first reported isolation of Rhabdovirus carpio from rainbow trout in Serbia. Also, this is the first successful infection of carp with Rhabdovirus carpio isolated from rainbow trout.
Article
The virucidal effect of disinfectants against spring viremia of carp virus was assessed using EPC cells. Five kinds of disinfectants, i.e. benzalkonium chloride (BZC), alkyltoluene (AKT), chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), cresol and ethanol, were examined at graduated concentrations of the disinfectants for different reaction periods, 30 s and 20 min. The minimum concentration of each disinfectant demonstrating >99.99% inactivation of the virus was 100 ppm (20 min) for BZC, 500 ppm (30 s) and 350 ppm (20 min) for AKT, 175 ppm (30 s) and 100 ppm (20 min) for CHG, 0.25% (30 s) and 200 ppm (20 min) for cresol and 50% (30 s) and 40% (20 min) for ethanol.
Article
In spring 2002, an estimated 1,500 common carp Cyprinus carpio in Cedar Lake, northwestern Wisconsin, died over a 6-week period from late April through the first week in June. Three moribund carp were necropsied and had signs consistent with spring viremia of carp (SVC) disease, including petechiae and ecchymotic hemorrhages on the skin, ascites, and edematous kidney and spleen. A virus was isolated on fathead minnow cells and shown to be a rhabdovirus by electron microscopy. Immunoassay results indicated a close serological relationship with spring viremia of carp virus (SVCV). This was confirmed by a reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction assay and subsequent analysis of a subsection glycoprotein gene. Immunocytochemistry and serum neutralization tests indicated that the Cedar Lake isolate did not share complete antigenic identity with the European reference SVCV. Also, the isolate showed an inhibition of cytopathic effect after repeated subculture in epithelioma papulosum cyprini and bluegill fibroblast cells when compared with other SVCV isolates. In virus transmission studies the isolate was shown to be of low virulence for juvenile carp. Sequence analysis showed that the Cedar Lake SVCV isolate was more closely related to a recently isolated North Carolina strain of SVCV (98.6% nucleotide identity) and to strains of Asian origin rather than the European reference strain of SVCV. This is the first report of an SVC epizootic in a wild common carp population in North America.
Article
ZusammenfassungDie fischpathogenen Viren (VHSV, PFR, SVCV, IPNV) erwiesen sich gegenüber chemisch physikalischen Einflüssen als relativ stabil.Im Wasser (10 °C) blieb das SVCV 42, das VHSV 49, das PFR 70 und das IPNV > 231 Tage infektiös.Im Teichschlamm (pH 6,79) überlebten bei 4 °C das VHSV 10, das PFR und SVCV 42 und das IPNV mehr als 210 Tage.Im getrockneten Zustand behielten die untersuchten Viren sowohl bei 4 als auch bei 20 °C die Infektiosität für länger als 28 Tage bei.γ-Strahlen (1000 krad) inaktivierten die behüllten Viren (VHSV, PFR, SVCV) vollständig, das IPNV nur partiell (∼ 90%).Durch UV-Strahlen (254 nm) wurden die Rhabdoviren (VHSV, PFR, SVCV) innerhalb 10 Minuten, das unbehüllte IPN-Virus innerhalb 60 Minuten vollständig inaktiviert.Methylenblau (20 mg/l), Malachitgrün (10 mg/l), Mefarol® (1%) und Kupfersulfat (100 mg/l) hatten auf die untersuchten Viren keine inaktivierenden Wirkungen.Natronlauge (2%) und Formaldehyd (3% der 40%igen Formaldehyd-lösung) inaktivierten die Erreger dagegen innerhalb 5–10 Minuten vollständig.Säure (pH 3) inaktivierte zwar das behüllte Rhabdovirus VHSV innerhalb 3 Stunden, hatte aber auf die Infektiosität des unbehüllten IPNV auch nach 6 Stunden keinen Einfluß.Natriumhypochloritlösung inaktivierte die untersuchten Viren nur partiell unter Verwendung vertretbarer Cl2-Konzentrationen. Zur völligen Inaktivierung der Viren waren bis zu 540 mg Cl2/l und Einwirkungszeiten zwischen 2 und 20 Minuten notwendig.DanksagungDie Untersuchungen wurden aus Mitteln des Bundesministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, Bonn, finanziert.Fräulein C. Held sei für die technische Assistenz, Fräulein van de Graaff für die Mitarbeit bei der Durchführung der Chlorbestimmung gedankt.SummaryComparative studies on the stability of four fish-pathogenic viruses (VHSV, PFR, SVCV, IPNV)The effects of environmental conditions (water, mud, drying), the action of gamma and UV irradiation as well as the influence of chemical components and disinfectants on the infectivity of VHSV, PFR, SVCV and IPNV were tested.Storage in tap water (10 °C) reduced virus titres but SVCV survived for 42, VHSV for 49, PFR for 70 and IPNV for more than 231 days.Viruses suspended in mud (pH 7,6, 4 °C) were stable for 10 (VHSV), 42 (PFR, SVCV) and for more than 210 days (IPNV).Drying of the viruses resulted in only inactivation of 1 log TCID50 and survival was not affected by dry condition for more than 28 days at 4 and 20 °C.Gamma irradiation (1000 krad) resulted in inactivation of 90% for IPNV and > 99.99% for VHSV, PFR, SVCV.Ultraviolet irradiation (254 nm) effected a 100% reduction of the infectivity of VHSV, PFR, SVCV in 10 min., of IPNV in 60 min.Methylene blue (20 mg/l), malachite green (10 mg/l) Mefarol® (1%) and copper sulphate (100 mg/l) had no effect on the viral activities of VHSV, PFR, SVCV, IPNV.NaOH (2%) and formalin (3% of the 40% formaldehyde-solution) destroyed all viruses investigated within 5–10 min.Acid (pH 3) reduced the infectivity of VHSV significantly in 3 hours but did not affect the infectivity of IPNV.In order to inactivate the viruses investigated to exposures to chlorine (Cl2) up to 540 mg/l for 2–20 min. were needed.RésuméRecherches comparées sur la stabilité de quatre virus pathogènes du poisson (VHSV, PFR, SVCV, IPNV)Les virus pathogènes du poisson (VHSV, PFR, SVCV, IPNV) se sont montrés relativement stables vis-à-vis de facteurs chimico-physiques. SVCV est resté infectieux dans l'eau à 10 °C durant 42 jours, VHSV 49 jours, PFR 70 jours et IPNV > 231 jours.VHSV a survécu à 4 °C dans de la boue d'étang (pH 6,79) 10 jours, PFR et SVCV 42 jours, IPNV plus de 210 jours.Les virus examinés sont restés infectieux plus longtemps que 28 jours à l'état desséché aussi bien à 4 qu'à 20 °C.Les raysons γ (1000 krad) ont inactivé complètement les virus encapsulés (VHSV, PFR, SVCV) et partiellement (IPNV (∼ 90%).Les Rhabdovirus (VHSV, PFR, SVCV) ont été complètement inactivés en 10 minutes avec des rayons UV (254 nm) et le virus non capsulé IPN en 60 minutes.Le bleu de méthylène (20 mg/l), le vert de malachite (10 mg/l), Mefarol® (1%) et le sulfate de cuivre (100 mg/l) n'ont pas eu d'effet d'inactivation sur les virus examinés.NaOH (2%) et la formaline (3% d'une solution à 40%) ont par contre complètement inactivé les agents en 5–10 minutes.L'acidité (pH 3) a inactivé le Rhabdovirus VHSV encapsulé en 3 heures, mais n'a pas eu d'influence sur l'infectiosité d'IPNV encapsulé après 6 heures.Une solution d'hypochlorite de sodium a inactivé les virus examinés en utilisant partiellement en remplacement des concentrations en Cl2.Une concentration jusqu'à 540 mg Cl2/l et des temps d'action entre 2 et 20 minutes ont été nécessaires pour une inactivation complète de virus.ResumenEstudios comparados sobre la estabilidad de cuatro virus piscipatógenos (VHSV, PFR, SVCV e IPNV)Los virus piscipatógenos (VHSV, PFR, SVCV e IPNV) se mostraron como relativamente estables frente a los influjos físicoquímicos.En el agua (10 °C) permaneció el SVCV 42 días infeccioso, mientras que el VHSV 49, el PFR 70 y el IPNV más de 231 días.En el barro de la laguna (pH 6.79) sobrevivieron a 4 °C el VHSV 10 días, el PFR y el SVCV 42 y el IPNV más de 210 días.Al estado desecado conservaron los virus examinados la infecciosidad tanto a 4° como a 20 °C durante más de 28 días.Los rayos γ (1.000 Krad) inactivaron los virus con envoltura (VHSV, PFR y SVCV) por completo, y el IPNV solo parcialmente (∼ 90%).Por medio de los rayos UV (254 nm) se inactivaron por completo los rabdovirus (VHSV, PFR y SVCV) en un plazo de 10 minutos, mientras que el virus IPN, sin envoltura, antes de 60 minutos.El azul de metileno (20 mg/l), verde de malaquita (10 mg/l), Mefarol® (1%) y sulfato de cobre (100 mg/l) no ejercieron ninguna acción inactivadora sobre los virus investigados.La lejía de hidróxido sódico (2%) y el aldehido metílico (3% de solución de aldehido fórmico al 40%) inactivaron por completo los agentes etiológicos en un plazo de 5–10 minutos.El medio ácido (pH 3) inactiva, eso sí, el rabdovirus VHSV, provisto de envoltura, en un plazo de tres horas, pero no ejercía ningún influjo sobre la infecciosidad del IPNV, que no tiene envoltura, incluso después de 6 horas.La solución de hipoclorito sódico inactivaba solo parcialmente los virus examinados, empleando concentraciones admisibles de Cl2. Para la inactivación total de los virus fueron precisos hasta 540 mg de Cl2/l y tiempos de actuación comprendidos entre 2 y 20 minutos.
Article
The potential of double- (ds) and single-stranded (ss) yeast RNA preparations for protection of carp Cyprinus carpio against experimental infection with Rhabdovirus carpio, the infectious agent of spring viraemia of carp, was studied. Prophylactic intraperitoneal injection of fish with dsRNA proved efficient while ssRNA had a much smaller effect. The protective effect of yeast dsRNA in 1-year-old carp lasted for at least 3 weeks. The efficacy of the preparations decreased considerably if they were administered by the bath method. Both insoluble and soluble carriers for dsRNA were studied to increase the preparation efficacy. Screening of the preparations revealed the importance of DEAE-groups on the carriers. Their biological efficiency is confirmed by the method of phagocytosis of the mouse peritoneal macrophages.