A preview of this full-text is provided by Optica Publishing Group.
Content available from Optics Express
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Propagation characteristics of the modified
circular Airy beam
Yunfeng Jiang,1,* Xiuwei Zhu,1 Wenlei Yu,1 Hehong Shao,1 Wanting Zheng,1 and
Xuanhui Lu2
1Institute of Lasers and Biophotonics, School of Information and Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University,
Wenzhou, China
2Institute of Optics, Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
*wmu_jyf@163.com
Abstract: We have proposed a kind of modified circular Airy beam
(MCAB) based upon a modification of the Fourier spectrum of circular
Airy beams (CAB) in this paper. Unlike most abruptly autofocusing beams,
the position of peak intensity of MCAB can be moved to any rings behind.
Two apodization parameters are introduced to describe the propagation
characteristics of MCAB. It is found that the focal position, focal trajectory
and the size of focal spot do not change with the apodization parameters;
but the abruptly autofocusing property will be greatly enhanced if
appropriately apodization parameters are chosen. Comparing with the
common CAB and the previous blocked CAB, the MCAB shows better
abruptly autofocusing property. It may have more applications in various
fields.
©2015 Optical Society of America
OCIS codes: (260.0260) Physical optics; (050.1940) Diffraction; (350.5500) Propagation.
References and links
1. N. K. Efremidis and D. N. Christodoulides, “Abruptly autofocusing waves,” Opt. Lett. 35(23), 4045–4047
(2010).
2. D. G. Papazoglou, N. K. Efremidis, D. N. Christodoulides, and S. Tzortzakis, “Observation of abruptly
autofocusing waves,” Opt. Lett. 36(10), 1842–1844 (2011).
3. I. Chremmos, P. Zhang, J. Prakash, N. K. Efremidis, D. N. Christodoulides, and Z. Chen, “Fourier-space
generation of abruptly autofocusing beams and optical bottle beams,” Opt. Lett. 36(18), 3675–3677 (2011).
4. S. Liu, M. Wang, P. Li, P. Zhang, and J. Zhao, “Abrupt polarization transition of vector autofocusing Airy
beams,” Opt. Lett. 38(14), 2416–2418 (2013).
5. F. Wang, C. Zhao, Y. Dong, Y. Dong, and Y. Cai, “Generation and tight-focusing properties of cylindrical
vector circular Airy beams,” Appl. Phys. B 117(3), 905–913 (2014).
6. W. Zhu and W. She, “Tightly focusing vector circular airy beam through a hard aperture,” Opt. Commun.
334(0), 303–307 (2015).
7. P. Zhang, J. Prakash, Z. Zhang, M. S. Mills, N. K. Efremidis, D. N. Christodoulides, and Z. Chen, “Trapping and
guiding microparticles with morphing autofocusing Airy beams,” Opt. Lett. 36(15), 2883–2885 (2011).
8. Y. Jiang, K. Huang, and X. Lu, “Radiation force of abruptly autofocusing Airy beams on a Rayleigh particle,”
Opt. Express 21(20), 24413–24421 (2013).
9. P. Panagiotopoulos, D. G. Papazoglou, A. Couairon, and S. Tzortzakis, “Sharply autofocused ring-Airy beams
transforming into non-linear intense light bullets,” Nat. Commun. 4, 2622 (2013).
10. N. K. Efremidis, V. Paltoglou, and W. von Klitzing, “Accelerating and abruptly autofocusing matter waves,”
Phys. Rev. A 87(4), 043637 (2013).
11. J. A. Davis, D. M. Cottrell, and D. Sand, “Abruptly autofocusing vortex beams,” Opt. Express 20(12), 13302–
13310 (2012).
12. Y. Jiang, K. Huang, and X. Lu, “Propagation dynamics of abruptly autofocusing Airy beams with optical
vortices,” Opt. Express 20(17), 18579–18584 (2012).
13. P. Li, S. Liu, T. Peng, G. Xie, X. Gan, and J. Zhao, “Spiral autofocusing Airy beams carrying power-exponent-
phase vortices,” Opt. Express 22(7), 7598–7606 (2014).
14. N. Li, Y. Jiang, K. Huang, and X. Lu, “Abruptly autofocusing property of blocked circular Airy beams,” Opt.
Express 22(19), 22847–22853 (2014).
15. I. Chremmos, N. K. Efremidis, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Pre-engineered abruptly autofocusing beams,” Opt.
Lett. 36(10), 1890–1892 (2011).
#250268
Received 17 Sep 2015; revised 28 Oct 2015; accepted 29 Oct 2015; published 5 Nov 2015
(C) 2015 OSA
16 Nov 2015 | Vol. 23, No. 23 | DOI:10.1364/OE.23.029834 | OPTICS EXPRESS 29834
16. I. D. Chremmos, Z. Chen, D. N. Christodoulides, and N. K. Efremidis, “Abruptly autofocusing and
autodefocusing optical beams with arbitrary caustics,” Phys. Rev. A 85(2), 023828 (2012).
17. P. Vaveliuk, A. Lencina, J. A. Rodrigo, and O. M. Matos, “Symmetric Airy beams,” Opt. Lett. 39(8), 2370–2373
(2014).
18. S. Barwick, “Reduced side-lobe Airy beams,” Opt. Lett. 36(15), 2827–2829 (2011).
19. I. D. Chremmos, Z. Chen, D. N. Christodoulides, and N. K. Efremidis, “Bessel-like optical beams with arbitrary
trajectories,” Opt. Lett. 37(23), 5003–5005 (2012).
20. G. A. Siviloglou, J. Broky, A. Dogariu, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Observation of Accelerating Airy Beams,”
Phys. Rev. Lett. 99(21), 213901 (2007).
1. Introduction
Recently, the circular Airy beam (CAB) has attracted great attentions of researchers due to its
unique abruptly autofocusing property [1–6]. Without invoking any lenses or nonlinearities,
the CAB can abruptly focus its energy right at the focal region while maintaining a low
intensity profile before [1]. The abruptly autofocusing property makes the CAB an ideal
candidate in biomedical treatment or laser ablation. Besides, the CAB can also be used in
optical micromanipulation [7, 8], generating light bullet [9] and other fields [10].
The control of the abruptly autofocusing property of the CAB is of great importance in
practice. Many methods have been proposed to enhance its intensity contrast or to change the
focal pattern, such as adding different optical vortices [11–13], blocking front light rings [14]
and so on. Meanwhile, many other abruptly autofocusing beams with special abruptly
autofocusing properties have also been proposed [15–17].
The Fourier transform plays a key role in producing and modulating special laser beams.
By the modification of Fourier spectrum, light beams with special property can be obtained.
For example, the reduced-side lobe Airy beams [18], the curved Bessel beam [19] and other
special beams, are all generated through the modulation of Fourier transform of
corresponding beams.
In this paper, we propose a kind of modified circular Airy beams (MCAB) based upon the
Fourier transform of the CAB. An apodization mask is added in the Fourier space to construct
the theoretical model of the MCAB. The propagation characteristics of the MCAB with
different apodization parameters are numerically calculated. The abruptly autofocusing
property of the MCAB is theoretically analyzed and compared with the common CAB and
blocked CAB (BCAB) [14]. Some useful and interesting results are found in our
investigations.
2. Fourier transform of the MCAB
The electric fields of CAB at the input plane can be expressed as [1]
00
0
() exp ,
rr rr
ur CAi a
ww
−−
=
(1)
where Ai is the Airy function, r is the radial distance, w is the scaled parameter, a is the decay
parameter, r0 is related with the initial radius of the CAB, C0 is a constant. The Fourier
transform of the famous Airy beam is simply the Gaussian beam with cubic phase [20], yet
the Fourier transform for circular Airy beams is not analytical. The closed form
approximation of the Fourier transform of the CAB can be expressed as [3]:
()
33 33
222 22
00
000
33
0
3
() ( )exp ,
333
rkrkw
kw
Uk Cw kw akw J kr
wkrkw
+
=+ − +
+
(2)
where k is the radial spatial frequency. Equation (2) shows the relation between the CAB and
the chirped Bessel function. It also offers an effective method to produce CAB [2, 3, 9]. The
#250268
Received 17 Sep 2015; revised 28 Oct 2015; accepted 29 Oct 2015; published 5 Nov 2015
(C) 2015 OSA
16 Nov 2015 | Vol. 23, No. 23 | DOI:10.1364/OE.23.029834 | OPTICS EXPRESS 29835
Fig. 1. Fourier transform of the modified circular Airy beam (MCAB). (a) Fourier spectrum
with different β when kc = 5mm−1;(b) Fourier spectrum with different kc when β = 0.3mm.
“β=0” is actually the common CAB.
distribution of the Fourier spectrum of CAB is shown in Fig. 1. The spectrum with low
frequency mainly affects front light rings of CAB, and the spectrum with high frequency
mainly affects the rings behind. As is demonstrated in [14], front rings of the CAB contribute
less to the peak intensity of the focal plane, and the abruptly autofocusing property would be
greatly enhanced if front rings of CAB are blocked. So it can be expected that the abruptly
autofocusing property can also be enhanced by reducing the spatial spectrum with low
frequency in Fourier space. Comparing with the blocking method in real space, the
modification in Fourier space would produce fewer unwanted diffraction artifacts in the
region of interest.
We can use an apodization mask M to reduce the low-frequency component [8]:
()
1
() ,
1c
kk
Mk e
β
−−
=+ (3)
where β controls the steepness of the apodization, and kc is the cutoff position of the spatial
frequency. So the modified Fourier spectrum can be expressed as:
() () ().
M
Uk MkUk= (4)
The influences of β and kc on the Fourier spectrum of CAB are shown in Fig. 1. In our
simulation, we choose r0 = 1mm, w = 10μm, a = 0.1, the wavelength λ = 1064nm, and the
light power after the apodization mask is 10mW throughout this paper. It is found that the
central peak of the spectrum reduces more quickly for a larger β [Fig. 1(a)], and more front
peaks will reduce for a larger kc [Fig. 1(b)].
3. Propagation characteristics with different apodization parameters
The evolution of the MCAB can be obtained through the Hankel transform of UM(k):
22
2
0
0
(, ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ,
iz k
M
urz MkUkJkre kdk
πλ
−
∞−
= (5)
when z = 0, Eq. (5) is the integral expression of MCAB at the initial plane. Based upon Eq.
(5), we can analyze the influences of β and kc on the propagation characteristics of MCAB.
Figure 2 shows the intensity patterns of MCAB with different β and kc at the initial plane
when the total energy is same. Both CAB and MCAB are composed of a series of light rings.
The position of each light ring remains unchanged with different β and kc, but the energies of
the rings will be redistributed.
The maximum intensity of the MCAB is smaller than that of the CAB at the initial plane,
as is shown in Fig. 3. For the MCAB, a small peak will appear before the first ring because of
#250268
Received 17 Sep 2015; revised 28 Oct 2015; accepted 29 Oct 2015; published 5 Nov 2015
(C) 2015 OSA
16 Nov 2015 | Vol. 23, No. 23 | DOI:10.1364/OE.23.029834 | OPTICS EXPRESS 29836
the diffraction effect from the apodization. By increasing the value of kc, the position of the
maximum intensity will be moved to the light rings behind. The second ring and the third ring
become the highest ring when kc = 10mm−1, and kc = 17mm−1, respectively [Fig. 3(b)]. So the
Fig. 2. Intensity patterns of MCAB at the initial plane. The first row is MCAB with different β
when kc = 5mm−1: (a) β = 0; (b) β = 0.3mm; (c) β = 0.6mm. The second row is MCAB with
different kc when β = 0.3mm: (d) kc = 5mm−1; (e) kc = 10mm−1; (f) kc = 17mm−1.
Fig. 3. Intensity distributions of MCAB at the initial plane. (a) MCAB with different β when kc
= 5mm−1; (b) MCAB with different kc when β = 0.3mm.
outer rings of MCAB become much more important than that of CAB.The value of β also
influences the intensity distribution of the MCAB. The ratio between the highest ring and
other rings can be modulated by changing the value of β.When β = 0, the MCAB becomes the
common CAB; when β is too large, the diffraction effect from apodization will be very
obvious.
Based upon Eq. (5), we can numerically calculate the propagation characteristics of the
MCAB. The simulation results are shown in Fig. 4. From Fig. 4, we can see that both CAB
and MCAB focus at a same point. The focal position is z = 0.277m. We can define the radius
of the first ring as the radius of MCAB. It is found that the radii of MCAB almost follow a
same parabolic trajectory with different apodization parameters, as can be seen in Fig. 5.
#250268
Received 17 Sep 2015; revised 28 Oct 2015; accepted 29 Oct 2015; published 5 Nov 2015
(C) 2015 OSA
16 Nov 2015 | Vol. 23, No. 23 | DOI:10.1364/OE.23.029834 | OPTICS EXPRESS 29837
Fig. 4. Propagation dynamics of MCAB in free space. The first row is MCAB with different β
when kc = 5mm−1: (a) β = 0; (b) β = 0.3mm; (c) β = 0.6mm. The second row is MCAB with
different kc when β = 0.3mm: (d) kc = 5mm−1; (e) kc = 10mm−1; (f) kc = 17mm−1.
Fig. 5. Trajectories of the radii of MCAB. (a) MCAB with different β when kc = 5mm−1; (b)
MCAB with different kc when β = 0.3mm.
Fig. 6. Intensity distributions of MCAB at the focal plane. (a) MCAB with different β when kc
= 5mm−1; (b) MCAB with different kc when β = 0.3mm.
#250268
Received 17 Sep 2015; revised 28 Oct 2015; accepted 29 Oct 2015; published 5 Nov 2015
(C) 2015 OSA
16 Nov 2015 | Vol. 23, No. 23 | DOI:10.1364/OE.23.029834 | OPTICS EXPRESS 29838
Fig. 7. Abruptly autofocusing property of MCAB. (a) MCAB with different β when kc =
5mm−1; (b) MCAB with different kc when β = 0.3mm.
Fig. 8. Maximum value of Im/I0 that MCAB can reach during propagation with different
apodization parameters: (a) change with β when kc is different; (b) change with kc when β is
different.
Although the focal position and the focal trajectory are not affected by the apodization, yet
the distribution of focal intensity changes with the apodization parameters. Figure 6(a) and
6(b) show that the maximum focal intensity of MCAB is larger than that of the common
CAB, and the maximum focal intensity increases with kc. The case of β is a little complicated.
To obtain a large focal intensity, β should not be too small or too great [Fig. 6(a)]. The reason
may be that the low-frequency component cannot be effectively reduced when β is too small,
but when β is too great, the unwanted diffraction effect may be enhanced at the focal plane. In
Fig. 6, we can also note that the FWHM of the central focal spot of MCAB is not changed
with β or kc. So the MCAB with a larger kc and an appropriate β will autofocus more strongly.
We assume that I0 is the maximum intensity of the initial plane, Im is the maximum
intensity of arbitrary plane along propagation. So the abruptly autofocusing property can be
analyzed through the intensity contrast of Im/I0 [1]. The change of Im/I0 with z is shown in Fig.
7. From Fig. 7, we can find that both the intensity of MCAB and CAB suddenly increase at z
= 0.250m, and quickly reach their maximum values at the focal point.
As we have mentioned before, I0 of MCAB is smaller than that of CAB at the initial
plane; but Im of MCAB is larger than that of the CAB at the focal plane. These indicate that
the abruptly autofocusing property would be greatly enhanced for MCAB. Figure 7 shows
that the maximum value of intensity contrast during propagation, (Im /I0)max, of MCAB is
much larger than that of the CAB. For the MCAB with β = 0.3mm and kc = 17mm−1, the value
of (Im /I0)max is 209, but for the CAB without apodization, this value is only 47. The value of
(Im/I0)max can be controlled through β and kc. From Fig. 8(a), it is found that for the MCAB
with different kc, (Im/I0)max reaches the maximum value at different β. For the beam with kc =
#250268
Received 17 Sep 2015; revised 28 Oct 2015; accepted 29 Oct 2015; published 5 Nov 2015
(C) 2015 OSA
16 Nov 2015 | Vol. 23, No. 23 | DOI:10.1364/OE.23.029834 | OPTICS EXPRESS 29839
5mm−1, the value of β that maximizes (Im/I0)max is 0.08mm; but this value will increases to
0.14mm, when kc = 17mm−1. Figure 8(b) shows that (Im/I0)max increases with kc. So we can
choose an appropriate β and a larger kc to further enhance the intensity contrast of MCAB.
However, kc should not be too large. It is difficult to generate MCAB with a large kc in
experiment, especially with the spatial light modulation. Practically, kc must be smaller than
πL/(λf), where L is the length of the hologram on the spatial light modulation, f is the focal
length of the Fourier lens.
Fig. 9. Comparison of the MCAB with BCAB. (a) Intensity profile at the initial plane; (b)
distribution of Im/I0 during propagation.CAB is the original circular Airy beams; the
apodization parameters for MCAB are β = 0.3mm, kc = 17mm−1.
For the blocked circular Airy beam (BCAB), the abruptly autofocusing property is
enhanced by directly blocking front light rings [14]. The autofocusing property of BCAB and
MCAB are both shown in Fig. 9. For the sake of comparison, we assume that the intensity of
the third ring is largest for both beams [Fig. 9(a)]. For BCAB, the first two rings are
eliminated at the initial plane; for MCAB, the first two rings still exist but are reduced. They
are generated from a same CAB. Figure 9(b) shows that the intensity of MCAB can be
increased much more times than that of BCAB, and the abruptness of focus is more obvious
for MCAB. The fact that the abruptly autofocusing property of MCAB is better than BCAB
indicates a general principle: it is not necessary to completely eliminate front rings of CAB to
enhance its focusing property, reducing the intensity of front rings is enough. On the other
hand, in experiment, it is easier to modify the Fourier spectrum of CAB than to block front
rings of CAB in real space, especially when one uses the Fourier transform method to
generate abruptly autofocusing beams. So MCAB will be more useful than the common CAB
and BCAB in the fields of optical micromanipulation, producing light bullet and other fields.
4. Conclusions
In summary, the propagation characteristics of MCAB is theoretically investigated in this
paper. The MCAB can be generated through the modification of CAB in the Fourier space.
Two apodization parameters β and kc have been introduced to describe the property of
MCAB. By varying the value of the apodization parameters, the front rings of CAB can be
reduced, and the position of maximum intensity can be moved to any rings behind at the
initial plane. The intensity of MCAB at the focal point increases with kc. But the focal
position, focal trajectory and the FWHM of the central focal spot do not change with the
apodization parameters. The abruptly autofocusing property of MCAB also can be controlled
through β and kc. An appropriate β and a larger kc should be chosen to further enhance the
autofocusing capability of MCAB. Under the same conditions, the MCAB has better abruptly
autofocusing property than the CAB and the previous BCAB, which indicates that
redistributing the energies of the light rings of CAB is an effective method to enhance or
#250268
Received 17 Sep 2015; revised 28 Oct 2015; accepted 29 Oct 2015; published 5 Nov 2015
(C) 2015 OSA
16 Nov 2015 | Vol. 23, No. 23 | DOI:10.1364/OE.23.029834 | OPTICS EXPRESS 29840
modulate the abruptly autofocusing property. We believe that the investigation of MCAB is
helpful for the application of abruptly autofocusing beams in various fields.
Acknowledgment
This work is supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant No.
11504274, and Grant No. 11474254), and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation
(Grant No. LQ16A040004).
#250268
Received 17 Sep 2015; revised 28 Oct 2015; accepted 29 Oct 2015; published 5 Nov 2015
(C) 2015 OSA
16 Nov 2015 | Vol. 23, No. 23 | DOI:10.1364/OE.23.029834 | OPTICS EXPRESS 29841
Content uploaded by Xiuwei Zhu
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Xiuwei Zhu on Nov 10, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.