A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Pure and Applied Geophysics
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Earthquake Hazard and the Environmental Seismic Intensity (ESI) Scale
LEONELLO SERVA,
1
EUTIZIO VITTORI,
2
VALERIO COMERCI,
2
ELIANA ESPOSITO,
3
LUCA GUERRIERI,
2
ALESSANDRO MARIA MICHETTI,
4
BAGHER MOHAMMADIOUN,
5
GEORGIANNA C. MOHAMMADIOUN,
5
SABINA PORFIDO,
3
and
RUBEN E. TATEVOSSIAN
6
Abstract—The main objective of this paper was to introduce
the Environmental Seismic Intensity scale (ESI), a new scale
developed and tested by an interdisciplinary group of scientists
(geologists, geophysicists and seismologists) in the frame of the
International Union for Quaternary Research (INQUA) activities,
to the widest community of earth scientists and engineers dealing
with seismic hazard assessment. This scale defines earthquake
intensity by taking into consideration the occurrence, size and areal
distribution of earthquake environmental effects (EEE), including
surface faulting, tectonic uplift and subsidence, landslides, rock
falls, liquefaction, ground collapse and tsunami waves. Indeed,
EEEs can significantly improve the evaluation of seismic intensity,
which still remains a critical parameter for a realistic seismic
hazard assessment, allowing to compare historical and modern
earthquakes. Moreover, as shown by recent moderate to large
earthquakes, geological effects often cause severe damage’’;
therefore, their consideration in the earthquake risk scenario is
crucial for all stakeholders, especially urban planners, geotechnical
and structural engineers, hazard analysts, civil protection agencies
and insurance companies. The paper describes background and
construction principles of the scale and presents some case studies
in different continents and tectonic settings to illustrate its relevant
benefits. ESI is normally used together with traditional intensity
scales, which, unfortunately, tend to saturate in the highest degrees.
In this case and in unpopulated areas, ESI offers a unique way for
assessing a reliable earthquake intensity. Finally, yet importantly,
the ESI scale also provides a very convenient guideline for the
survey of EEEs in earthquake-stricken areas, ensuring they are
catalogued in a complete and homogeneous manner.
Key words: Earthquake geological effects, ESI, intensity
scale, magnitude, seismic hazard assessment.
1. Introduction
Earthquake environmental effects (EEE) are all
the effects, from geological to hydrological, physical
and meteorological, that a seismic event can induce
on the natural environment (MICHETTI et al. 2007).
Among them, the coseismic geological effects are the
most hazardous. They range from surface faulting,
which can reach displacements of many meters and
extend for hundreds of kilometers, to landslides, rock
falls, liquefaction, ground collapse and many other
consequences, including tsunamis.
Earthquake environmental effects are common
features produced by moderate to large crustal
earthquakes, in both their near and far fields. Always
recorded and surveyed in recent events, very often
they are remembered in historical accounts and con-
served in the stratigraphic record as paleo-earthquake
markers, the latter being the basis of paleoseismology
(e.g., MCCALPIN 2009). Both surface deformation and
faulting and shaking-related geological effects (e.g.,
liquefaction, landslides) not only leave permanent
imprints in the environment, but can also severely
impact man-made structures (e.g., HANCOX et al.
2002;H
ONEGGER et al. 2004; EERI 2008,2011).
Moreover, underwater fault ruptures and seismically
triggered landslides can generate devastating tsunami
waves (cf. WARD 2001;HARBITZ et al. 2006;TEN
BRINK et al. 2009;OZAWA et al. 2011;SATAKE et al.
2013; and bibliography therein).
These phenomena represent significant sources of
hazard, especially (but not exclusively) during large
earthquakes, substantially contributing to the sce-
narios of destruction. Severe damage to buildings and
infrastructure from surface faulting, landslides and
liquefaction is commonly experienced during
1
Via dei Dauni, 1, 00185 Rome, Italy.
2
ISPRA, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca
Ambientale, Via Vitaliano Brancati, 48, 00144 Rome, Italy.
E-mail: eutizio.vittori@isprambiente.it
3
IAMC-CNR, Calata Porta di Massa, 80133 Naples, Italy.
4
Dipartimento di Scienza e Alta Tecnologia, Universita
`
dell’Insubria, Via Valleggio, 11, 22100 Como, Italy.
5
Robin’s Wood Consulting, 11612 Sheppard’s Crossing
Road, Whaleyville, MD 21872, USA.
6
Institute of the Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of
Sciences, B. Gruzinskaya 10, Moscow 123995, Russia.
Pure Appl. Geophys. 173 (2016), 1479–1515
2015 Springer Basel
DOI 10.1007/s00024-015-1177-8 Pure and Applied Geophysics
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.