ArticlePublisher preview available
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

The main objective of this paper was to introduce the Environmental Seismic Intensity scale (ESI), a new scale developed and tested by an interdisciplinary group of scientists (geologists, geophysicists and seismologists) in the frame of the International Union for Quaternary Research (INQUA) activities, to the widest community of earth scientists and engineers dealing with seismic hazard assessment. This scale defines earthquake intensity by taking into consideration the occurrence, size and areal distribution of earthquake environmental effects (EEE), including surface faulting, tectonic uplift and subsidence, landslides, rock falls, liquefaction, ground collapse and tsunami waves. Indeed, EEEs can significantly improve the evaluation of seismic intensity, which still remains a critical parameter for a realistic seismic hazard assessment, allowing to compare historical and modern earthquakes. Moreover, as shown by recent moderate to large earthquakes, geological effects often cause severe damage”; therefore, their consideration in the earthquake risk scenario is crucial for all stakeholders, especially urban planners, geotechnical and structural engineers, hazard analysts, civil protection agencies and insurance companies. The paper describes background and construction principles of the scale and presents some case studies in different continents and tectonic settings to illustrate its relevant benefits. ESI is normally used together with traditional intensity scales, which, unfortunately, tend to saturate in the highest degrees. In this case and in unpopulated areas, ESI offers a unique way for assessing a reliable earthquake intensity. Finally, yet importantly, the ESI scale also provides a very convenient guideline for the survey of EEEs in earthquake-stricken areas, ensuring they are catalogued in a complete and homogeneous manner.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Earthquake Hazard and the Environmental Seismic Intensity (ESI) Scale
LEONELLO SERVA,
1
EUTIZIO VITTORI,
2
VALERIO COMERCI,
2
ELIANA ESPOSITO,
3
LUCA GUERRIERI,
2
ALESSANDRO MARIA MICHETTI,
4
BAGHER MOHAMMADIOUN,
5
GEORGIANNA C. MOHAMMADIOUN,
5
SABINA PORFIDO,
3
and
RUBEN E. TATEVOSSIAN
6
Abstract—The main objective of this paper was to introduce
the Environmental Seismic Intensity scale (ESI), a new scale
developed and tested by an interdisciplinary group of scientists
(geologists, geophysicists and seismologists) in the frame of the
International Union for Quaternary Research (INQUA) activities,
to the widest community of earth scientists and engineers dealing
with seismic hazard assessment. This scale defines earthquake
intensity by taking into consideration the occurrence, size and areal
distribution of earthquake environmental effects (EEE), including
surface faulting, tectonic uplift and subsidence, landslides, rock
falls, liquefaction, ground collapse and tsunami waves. Indeed,
EEEs can significantly improve the evaluation of seismic intensity,
which still remains a critical parameter for a realistic seismic
hazard assessment, allowing to compare historical and modern
earthquakes. Moreover, as shown by recent moderate to large
earthquakes, geological effects often cause severe damage’’;
therefore, their consideration in the earthquake risk scenario is
crucial for all stakeholders, especially urban planners, geotechnical
and structural engineers, hazard analysts, civil protection agencies
and insurance companies. The paper describes background and
construction principles of the scale and presents some case studies
in different continents and tectonic settings to illustrate its relevant
benefits. ESI is normally used together with traditional intensity
scales, which, unfortunately, tend to saturate in the highest degrees.
In this case and in unpopulated areas, ESI offers a unique way for
assessing a reliable earthquake intensity. Finally, yet importantly,
the ESI scale also provides a very convenient guideline for the
survey of EEEs in earthquake-stricken areas, ensuring they are
catalogued in a complete and homogeneous manner.
Key words: Earthquake geological effects, ESI, intensity
scale, magnitude, seismic hazard assessment.
1. Introduction
Earthquake environmental effects (EEE) are all
the effects, from geological to hydrological, physical
and meteorological, that a seismic event can induce
on the natural environment (MICHETTI et al. 2007).
Among them, the coseismic geological effects are the
most hazardous. They range from surface faulting,
which can reach displacements of many meters and
extend for hundreds of kilometers, to landslides, rock
falls, liquefaction, ground collapse and many other
consequences, including tsunamis.
Earthquake environmental effects are common
features produced by moderate to large crustal
earthquakes, in both their near and far fields. Always
recorded and surveyed in recent events, very often
they are remembered in historical accounts and con-
served in the stratigraphic record as paleo-earthquake
markers, the latter being the basis of paleoseismology
(e.g., MCCALPIN 2009). Both surface deformation and
faulting and shaking-related geological effects (e.g.,
liquefaction, landslides) not only leave permanent
imprints in the environment, but can also severely
impact man-made structures (e.g., HANCOX et al.
2002;H
ONEGGER et al. 2004; EERI 2008,2011).
Moreover, underwater fault ruptures and seismically
triggered landslides can generate devastating tsunami
waves (cf. WARD 2001;HARBITZ et al. 2006;TEN
BRINK et al. 2009;OZAWA et al. 2011;SATAKE et al.
2013; and bibliography therein).
These phenomena represent significant sources of
hazard, especially (but not exclusively) during large
earthquakes, substantially contributing to the sce-
narios of destruction. Severe damage to buildings and
infrastructure from surface faulting, landslides and
liquefaction is commonly experienced during
1
Via dei Dauni, 1, 00185 Rome, Italy.
2
ISPRA, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca
Ambientale, Via Vitaliano Brancati, 48, 00144 Rome, Italy.
E-mail: eutizio.vittori@isprambiente.it
3
IAMC-CNR, Calata Porta di Massa, 80133 Naples, Italy.
4
Dipartimento di Scienza e Alta Tecnologia, Universita
`
dell’Insubria, Via Valleggio, 11, 22100 Como, Italy.
5
Robin’s Wood Consulting, 11612 Sheppard’s Crossing
Road, Whaleyville, MD 21872, USA.
6
Institute of the Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of
Sciences, B. Gruzinskaya 10, Moscow 123995, Russia.
Pure Appl. Geophys. 173 (2016), 1479–1515
2015 Springer Basel
DOI 10.1007/s00024-015-1177-8 Pure and Applied Geophysics
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... All locations where ground fissures and liquefaction were noticed are also depicted with a yellow symbol. We attempted to assess macroseismic intensity values using the ESI-2007 scale (Environmental Seismic Intensity Scale) [20,21] in addition to the EMS 98 scale. The ESI-2007 scale is based on coseismic environmental effects, both primary and secondary. ...
... We intend to provide a more thorough examination of the coseismic environmental effects of the 1893 earthquake in our future research. Here, we will just note that our preliminary estimates of the ESI-2007 scale [20,21] intensities match our estimates of EMS-98 intensities quite well for the first three isoseismals (IX, VIII, and VII). ...
... We intend to provide a more thorough examination of the coseismic environmental effects of the 1893 earthquake in our future research. Here, we will just note that our preliminary estimates of the ESI-2007 scale [20,21] intensities match our estimates of EMS-98 intensities quite well for the first three isoseismals (IX, VIII, and VII). and VIII (left); the neotectonic map of the wider epicentral area (right, adapted from Ref. [22], see Appendix E) with the plotted isoline of degree IX (bounding the epicentral area) and the epicenter location (for the color code and more details please refer to Fig. E1 in Appendix E and to [22]). ...
Article
Full-text available
A devastating earthquake took place on 8 April 1893, close to the town of Svilajnac, central Serbia. Over the past decade, significant historical data on the effects of this earthquake has been collected from a variety of sources, including books, scientific publications, reports, newspapers, and coeval chronicles. Additionally, this earthquake was recorded 750 km from the epicenter at the seismological station Rocca di Papa in Rome, Italy. Based on critical review and analysis of the historical data, we demonstrate that the epicentral area of this earthquake was 531 km2, and the macroseismic effects were recorded at epicentral distances up to 600 km towards the west (Vienna, Austria) towards the north, up to 500 km (Košice–Michalovce, Slovakia), towards the east up to 460 km (Brašov–Borsec, Romania); and towards the south up to about 300 km (Radoviš, North Macedonia). Finally, we show that the key parameters of the 1893 Svilajnac earthquake are as follows: (1) epicentral intensity, I0 = IX EMS-98, (2) the estimations of the moment magnitude and focal depth based on the observed intensities, MW = 6.8 and h = 13 km, respectively, and (3) the epicenter coordinates, 44.160° N and 21.354° E.
... The aims of our work are: (i) to document EEEs triggered by the Cotabato-Davao del Sur seismic sequence through field surveys and remote mapping; (ii) to categorize EEEs using the environmental seismic intensity (ESI-07) scale, which is a macroseismic scale based only on effects on the natural environment (Michetti et al. 2007;Serva et al. 2016;Ferrario et al. 2022); (iii) to evaluate the progression of damage through time, by associating each EEE to its causative event, whenever possible. ...
... The assessment of ESI-07 intensity is based on different hierarchical levels: each point where an EEE has been documented is referred to as a "site" and original data should be compiled at this level. Then, sites sharing a homogeneous setting can be grouped into "localities" (Michetti et al. 2004(Michetti et al. , 2007Serva et al. 2016). Additionally, the epicentral ESI-07 intensity can be assigned based on the dimension of the area affected by secondary effects, or on the length of surface faulting. ...
... During the field surveys, measured elements at each site were evaluated in order to delineate the ESI-07 local intensity: In the case of liquefaction, such elements include the dimension of sand volcanoes and the length of sand boils alignment; for ground cracks, the width and length was measured; for slope movements, the volume was visually assessed. We remark that the ESI-07 intensity is a classification of environmental effects and that their dimension scales with the intensity degree (Michetti et al. 2007;Serva et al. 2016): As an example, for liquefaction features, ESI-07 intensity VII corresponds to sand boils up to 50 cm in diameter; ESI-07 VIII corresponds to sand boils up to 1 m; ESI-07 intensity IX corresponds to sand boils up to 3 m. Such a kind of quantitative estimation is available for all the types of environmental effects and moving from a given intensity degree to the higher one requires a significant change in the size of the effect. ...
Article
Full-text available
In the period of October–December 2019, the Cotabato–Davao del Sur region (Philippines) was hit by a seismic sequence comprising four earthquakes with magnitude MW > 6.0 (EQ1-4; max magnitude MW 6.8). The earthquakes triggered widespread environmental effects, including landslides and liquefaction features. We documented such effects by means of field surveys, which we supplemented with landslide mapping from satellite images. Field surveys allowed us to gather information on 43 points after EQ1, 202 points after EQs2–3 and 87 points after EQ4. Additionally, we built a multi-temporal inventory of landslides from remote sensing, comprising 190 slope movements triggered by EQ1, 4737 after EQs2–3, and 5666 at the end of the sequence. We assigned an intensity value to each environmental effect using the environmental seismic intensity (ESI-07) scale. Our preferred estimates of ESI-07 epicentral intensity are VIII for the first earthquake and IX at the end of the sequence, which is in broad agreement with other events of similar magnitude globally. This study, which is the first case of the application of the ESI-07 scale to a seismic sequence in the Philippines, shows that repeated documentation of environmental damage and the evaluation of the progression through time may be useful for providing input data for derivative products, such as susceptibility assessment, evaluation of residual risk or investigation of the role played by ground shaking and by other mechanisms able to trigger environmental effects.
... This indicates that reassessing the seismic intensity of both recent and historical earthquakes is necessary. Such a reassessment is crucial to reduce the uncertainty inherent in attenuation relationships and, consequently, to diminish uncertainty in seismic hazard maps (Papanikolaou 2011;Serva et al. 2016;Chunga et al. 2018;Naik et al. 2020;Naik et al. 2023a;Naik et al. 2023b). Although studies in the Mediterranean Region have already provided an attenuation relationship between seismic intensity and magnitude, developing scaling relationships between epicentral intensity, moment magnitude, and intensities in affected areas requires more ESI-2007 intensity data from diverse earthquakes in varied tectonic settings (Papanikolaou and Melaki 2017;Naik et al. 2020;Ferrario et al. 2022). ...
... For instance, the difference between PEIS intensity VI and MM intensity VI is a mere 0.6, a margin that is difficult to distinguish in the field using the intensity scales used by PHIVOLCS or USGS during immediate disaster response scenarios (Bautista and Oike 2000). This disparity can be reduced by assessing the seismic intensity using the effects of earthquakes on the natural environment, in particular the geologic impacts, instead of the effect on the built environment, which is the basis of the PEIS and MM intensity scales Audemard et al. 2015;Serva et al. 2016). ...
Article
Full-text available
The macroseismic intensity of the February 6, 2012, Negros Oriental earthquake (MW 6.7), which affected the islands of Negros and Cebu, central Philippines, has been reassessed in this study using the Environmental Seismic Intensity Scale (ESI-2007). This earthquake caused a ∼75-km-long surface rupture along a previously unmapped fault and resulted in extensive landslides, localized liquefaction, lateral spreading, a tsunami, and widespread damage to infrastructure near the epicentral area. Considering the widespread earthquake environmental effects (EEEs), ESI-2007 intensities were evaluated for 324 locations covering an area of approximately 1000 km² within the Negros and Cebu Islands. A systematic comparison was conducted between the ESI-2007 scale and the traditional intensity scales (PHIVOLCS earthquake intensity scale (PEIS) and Modified Mercalli Intensity scale (MM) along with the generation of an ESI-2007 shake map, which is solely based on site-specific ESI-2007 intensity values. According to the ESI-2007 scale, the epicentral intensity I0=X is assessed. This is two degrees higher than the intensity of the PEIS, and three degrees higher than the modified MM intensity provided by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). The intensity difference may also be due to the lack of suitable observations of building damage data in this sparsely populated region of the Philippines. Comparison of the ShakeMap that was constructed using the ESI-2007 intensities with the PHIVOLCS and USGS ShakeMap suggests that the instrumental or structural damage-based intensity maps underestimate the seismic intensity for the 2012 Negros Oriental earthquake. The ESI-2007 ShakeMap presented in this work is pertinent for the assessment of future seismic risk associated with other earthquake generators in the vicinity of the islands of Negros and Cebu. It can be integrated with the PEIS or MM intensity scale to improve disaster management and planning, post-earthquake recovery efforts, and damage estimation.
... Landslides are one of the Earthquake Environmental Effects (EEEs) that can be categorised systematically by applying the Environmental Seismic Intensity (ESI) scale (Michetti et al., 2004) (Michetti A.M. et al., 2007) (Serva, 2019;Serva et al., 2016). The ESI scale assigns macroseismic intensity based exclusively on EEEs and is also applicable in sparsely populated regions. ...
... The ESI epicentral intensity varies between VII and XII. It is worth noting that three events reached the maximum intensity of XII (Lekkas, 2010;Sanchez & Maldonado, 2016;Serva et al., 2016), while several earthquakes show an ESI intensity of XI. The Porgera earthquake fits well in the plot with previous case histories. ...
Article
Full-text available
On the 25 February 2018, an earthquake of magnitude Mw7.5 struck the region of Porgera in Papua New Guinea (PNG), triggering numerous landslides. Planetscope images are used to derive a partial inventory of 2941 landslides in a cloud-free area of 2686 km². The average area of landslides in the study area is 18,500 m². We use the Environmental Seismic Intensity (ESI) scale to assess the damage due to the triggered landslides. Local intensity values are assigned to individual landslides by calculating their volume using various area–volume relations. We observe that different empirical relations yield similar volume values for individual landslides (local ESI intensity ≥ X). The spatial variation of landslide density and areal coverage within the study area in cells of 1 km² is investigated and compared to the probability predicted by the USGS model. We observe that high probability corresponds to a significant number of landslides. An ESI epicentral intensity of XI is estimated based on primary and secondary effects. This study represents the first application of the ESI scale to an earthquake in PNG. The Porgera earthquake fits well with past case studies worldwide in terms of ESI scale epicentral intensity and triggered landslide number as a function of earthquake magnitude.
... Recent developments enable combining different intensity scales under the same umbrella, namely, the EMS-98 macroseismic (Grünthal 1998), the PI-2001 tsunami (Papadopoulos and Imamura 2001) and the ESI-2007 environmental (Serva et al. 2016) effects. These scales comprise 12 grades that are generally in line with each other. ...
Article
Full-text available
On July 9th, 551 AD, a strong earthquake followed by a noticeable tsunami and another destructive shock hit the littoral zone of Phoenicia, currently Lebanon. The sequence of events was associated with active faults in the region, but the source able to explain both seismic and tsunami effects is still a matter of open debate. This article contributes to unlocking this enigma by providing a modern analysis of the historical accounts of macroseismic effects, earthquake environmental and tsunami effects, and archaeoseismic findings. Here, we conduct seismotectonic research, evaluate the intensities of all the associated effects, and perform coseismic deformation and numerical tsunami modeling to infer the most likely source. Our results suggest that either the thrust system noted as Mount Lebanon Thrust underlying Lebanon and crops out at the seabed offshore of the coast or the intermittent transpressive Tripoli-Batroun-Jounieh-Damour fault zone along the Lebanese coast are the best candidate sources for the 551 AD earthquakes and tsunami. Both of these sources allow us to better explain the macroseismic, morphological and tsunamigenic effects. Remarkably, the notable uplift of the coastal, marine-cut terraces along the Lebanese littoral zone is well reproduced by the coseismic uplift associated with these sources, thus also clarifying the considerable drawback of the sea and limited inundation reported by the historical accounts.
... The Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) scale is a subjective measurement scale used to assess the intensity of shaking experienced during an earthquake at a specific location. Unlike magnitude, which measures the energy released by an earthquake at its source, intensity describes the effects of the earthquake as perceived by people and the damage caused to structures and the environment [19]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Seismic vulnerability modeling plays a crucial role in seismic risk assessment, aiding decision-makers in pinpointing areas and structures most prone to earthquake damage. While machine learning (ML) algorithms and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have emerged as promising tools for seismic vulnerability modeling, there remains a notable gap in comprehensive geospatial studies focused on India. Previous studies in seismic vulnerability modeling have primarily focused on specific regions or countries, often overlooking the unique challenges and characteristics of India. In this study, we introduce a novel approach to seismic vulnerability modeling, leveraging ML and GIS to address these gaps. Employing Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Random Forest algorithms, we predict damage intensity values for earthquake events based on various factors such as location, depth, land cover, proximity to major roads, rivers, soil type, population density, and distance from fault lines. A case study in the Satara district of Maharashtra underscores the effectiveness of our model in identifying vulnerable buildings and enhancing seismic risk assessment at a local level. This innovative approach not only fills the gap in existing research by providing predictive modeling for seismic damage intensity but also offers a valuable tool for disaster management and urban planning decision-makers.
... At least in principle, the evaluation of the seismic triggering of landslides implies the assessment of the exceedance of the critical acceleration at the site of interest, whose computation requires knowledge of site-specific geotechnical parameters (e.g., soil cohesion, friction angle, and unit weight). Alternatively, it can be achieved by analyzing the seismic parameters that are commonly related to landslide triggering, such as earthquake magnitude (M), source-to-site distance (R), epicentral intensity, peak ground acceleration (PGA) (in the present work, the terms "peak horizontal acceleration" and "peak ground acceleration" are used interchangeably), Arias intensity (I a ), and spectral acceleration (S a ) [1,3,4,8,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Nowadays, the values of most of these parameters can be easily obtained by querying national hazard maps through online web services, at least at the screening level. ...
Article
Full-text available
In this study, we defined screening maps for Italy that classify sites based on their potential for triggering landslides. To this end, we analyzed seismic hazard maps and hazard disaggregation results on a national scale considering four spectral periods (0.01 s, 0.2 s, 0.5 s, and 1.0 s) and three return periods (475, 975, and 2475 years). First, joint distributions of magnitude (M) and distance (R) from hazard disaggregation were analyzed by means of an innovative approach based on image processing techniques to find all modal scenarios contributing to the hazard. In order to obtain the M-R scenarios controlling the triggering of earthquake-induced landslides at any computation node, mean and modal M-R pairs were compared to empirical curves defining the M-R bounds associated with landslide triggering. Three types of landslides were considered (i.e., disrupted slides and falls, coherent slides, and lateral spreads and flows). As a result, screening maps for all of Italy showing the potential for triggering landslides based on the level of seismic hazard were obtained. The maps and the related data are freely accessible.
... For major onshore landslides and rockfalls, a shaking intensity of VII½ or higher is generally required (e.g., Keefer, 1984;Serva et al., 2016), and is confirmed by the observations following the 2007 Mw6.2 earthquake in Aysén Fjord (Naranjo et al., 2009;Sepúlveda et al., 2010). Subaquatic mass-movements can occur with intensities of VI½ and higher (e.g., Moernaut et al., 2014;Monecke et al., 2004;Van Daele et al., 2015;Wilhelm et al., 2016). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Chilean Patagonia is confronted with several geohazards due to its tectonic setting, i.e., the presence of a subduction zone and numerous fault zones (e.g. the Liquiñe-Ofqui Fault Zone). This region has therefore been the subject of numerous paleoseismological studies. However, this study reveals that the seismic hazard is not limited to these large tectonic structures by identifying past fault activity near Coyhaique in the Aysén Region. Mass wasting deposits in Lago Pollux, a lake located ca. 15 km SW of this region’s capital, were identified through analysis of reflection-seismic data and was linked to a simultaneous event recorded in nearby Lago Castor. Furthermore, a coeval ~50 year-long catchment response was identified in Aysén Fjord based on the multiproxy analysis of a portion of a sediment core. Assuming that this widely recognized event was triggered by an earthquake, ground-motion modelling was applied to derive the most likely magnitude and source fault. The model showed that an earthquake rupture along a local fault, in the vicinity of Lago Pollux and Lago Castor, with a magnitude of 5.6–6.8, is the most likely scenario.
Article
Full-text available
Over the past two decades, the airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) system has become a useful tool for acquiring high-resolution topographic data, especially in active tectonics studies. Analyzing Digital Terrain Models (DTMs) from LiDAR exposes morpho-structural elements, aiding in the understanding of fault zones, among other applications. Despite its effectiveness, challenges persist in regions with rapid deformation, dense vegetation, and human impact. We propose an adapted workflow transitioning from the conventional airborne LiDAR system to the usage of drone-based LiDAR technology for higher-resolution data acquisition. Additionally, drones offer a more cost-effective solution, both in an initial investment and ongoing operational expenses. Our goal is to demonstrate how drone-based LiDAR enhances the identification of active deformation features, particularly for earthquake-induced surface faulting. To evaluate the potential of our technique, we conducted a drone-based LiDAR survey in the Casamicciola Terme area, north of Ischia Island, Italy, known for the occurrence of destructive shallow earthquakes, including the 2017 Md = 4 event. We assessed the quality of our acquired DTM by comparing it with existing elevation datasets for the same area. We discuss the advantages and limitations of each DTM product in relation to our results, particularly when applied to fault mapping. By analyzing derivative DTM products, we identified the fault scarps within the Casamicciola Holocene Graben (CHG) and mapped its structural geometry in detail. The analysis of both linear and areal geomorphic features allowed us to identify the primary factors influencing the current morphological arrangement of the CHG area. Our detailed map depicts a nested graben formed by two main structures (the Maio and Sentinella faults) and minor internal faults (the Purgatorio and Nizzola faults). High-resolution DEMs acquired by drone-based LiDAR facilitated detailed studies of the geomorphology and fault activity. A similar approach can be applied in regions where the evidence of high slip-rate faults is difficult to identify due to vegetation cover and inaccessibility.
Chapter
Earthquakes are one of the main natural disasters that have a significant impact on large-scale regions. There are significant differences in the impact of earthquakes of various intensities occurring in different regions on building clusters. China is located between the Taiping earthquake belt and the Eurasian earthquake belt, making it one of the countries with high earthquake incidence. This chapter reports on the distribution of earthquake zones in China and the damage caused to engineering structures by strong earthquakes. A case study was conducted using the Wenchuan earthquake on May 12, 2008, in China. The failure characteristics, disaster mechanisms, and vulnerability of different typical engineering structures (buildings and bridges) were analyzed, thus leading to the core content of this book’s research.
Article
Full-text available
Macroseismic intensity scales are used in order to measure the size of an earthquake using the impact of the ground shaking on humans, man made environment and nature. The INQUA scale is a new scale based solely on the earthquake-induced ground deformations, proposed by the INQUA Subcommission on Paleoseismicity. This scale is applied to the Sofades 1954 earthquake in order to test its accuracy and reliability. From the comparison among the evaluated intensities based on MM scale with the degrees of INQUA intensity at several locations, we conclude that, in case of earthquakes which triggered remarkable geological effects, these intensity values are about the same. Nonetheless, the use of INQUA scale is suggested in combination with the existing ones, as an assessing tool of the intensity based only on geological effects
Data
Full-text available
The latest version of the Italian Macroseismic Database, DBMI15, has been released in July 2016, and replaces the prevision version, called DBMI11 (Locati et al., 2011). DBMI makes available a set of macroseismic intensity data related to Italian earthquakes and covers the time-window 1000-2014. Intensity data derive from studies by authors from various Institutions, both in Italy and bordering countries (France, Austria, Slovenia, and Croatia). Macroseismic Data Points (MDPs) are collected and organized in DBMI for several scopes. The main goal is to create a homogenous set of data for assessing earthquake parameters (epicentral location and magnitude) for compiling the Parametric Catalogue of Italian Earthquakes (CPTI). The data provided by DBMI are also used for compiling the seismic history of thousands of Italian localities (15213 in DBMI15), in other words the list of effects observed in a place through time as a consequence of earthquakes, expressed as macroseismic intensity degrees. As they are closely linked, DBMI and CPTI tend to be published at the same time, and using the same release version (e.g. DBMI04-CPTI04, DBMI11-CPTI11), but in two distinct websites, one for DBMI, and a different one for CPTI. From this release, DBMI and CPTI (Rovida et al., 2016) are made available using a unified website.
Article
Full-text available
This work presents a catalogue of the tsunamis generated in the seas watering the Italian coasts, including the neighbouring area of Côte d'Azur (France). Events generated far from Italy and affecting the Italian coasts are not taken into account here. The catalogue, that we will also call the Quick-Look Catalog (QLC), is organised in three main sections that are named the Quick-Look Table, the Quick-Look Accounts File and the References File, having the respective abbreviations of QLT, QLAF and RF. The QLT is a synoptic table containing the relevant information available for each event, one table row corresponding to one event. More details are provided in the QLAF, where each event is dedicated a specific subsection: here the description of the tsunami includes all essential aspects that are suitably referenced and is preceded by a concise report concerning the tsunami cause. Lastly, the RF is the list of all the papers and publications quoted in the QLT and QLAF. Notice that efforts have been made to qualify each event by means of contemporaneous sources, although later sources and indirect sources, such as existing catalogues, have not been disregarded. Besides, specific recent studies on the events have been given special mention. In this work some general review of the past catalogues of tsunamis and of recent trends in the subject are expressed. Particularly, great attention is given to analysing the CFB of the Italian tsunamis due to Caputo and his collaborators (Caputo and Faita, 1984; Bedosti and Caputo, 1986), the acronym being formed by the ordered initials of the authors. Motivations clarifying the need for a new catalogue of the Italian tsunamis are illustrated circumstantially. The very different philosophies that are at the basis of the CFB and of the present QLC lead to quite diverse products and results, that are summarised by a table where the events included in the CFB and in the QLC are compared: the net effect of the rigorous scrutiny applied to the sources and of the coherent analysis applied to the data is that only 67 events are included in the QLC, which is about one third of the events that can be counted in the CFB.
Article
Full-text available
The occurrence of seismic-induced landslides is known in Protugal and Spain since remote epochs. During the last decades, several research groups have studied this topic gathering information about it. In this work, a revision of the contributions is done and a database of induced landslides in presented also, which contains both triggering events and associated landslides in the Iberian Peninsula and insular areas. From this database, an analysis of landslide characteristics is done by considering its typology and the epicentral distance as a function of the magnitude of causative event. These data constitute a base for future studies of the risk associated to this phenomenon.
Article
Full-text available
The 3 November 2002 Mw 7.9 Denali fault earthquake sequence initiated on the newly discovered Susitna Glacier thrust fault and caused 48 km of surface rupture. Rupture of the Susitna Glacier fault generated scarps on ice of the Susitna and West Fork glaciers and on tundra and surficial deposits along the southern front of the central Alaska Range. Based on detailed mapping, 27 topographic profiles, and field observations, we document the characteristics and slip distribution of the 2002 ruptures and describe evidence of pre-2002 ruptures on the fault. The 2002 surface faulting produced structures that range from simple folds on a single trace to complex thrust-fault ruptures and pressure ridges on multiple, sinuous strands. The deformation zone is locally more than 1 km wide. We measured a maximum vertical displacement of 5.4 m on the south-directed main thrust. North-directed backthrusts have more than 4 m of surface offset. We measured a well-constrained near-surface fault dip of about 19° at one site, which is considerably less than seismologically determined values of 35°–48°. Surface-rupture data yield an estimated magnitude of Mw 7.3 for the fault, which is similar to the seismological value of Mw 7.2. Comparison of field and seismological data suggest that the Susitna Glacier fault is part of a large positive flower structure associated with northwest-directed transpressive deformation on the Denali fault. Prehistoric scarps are evidence of previous rupture of the Sustina Glacier fault, but additional work is needed to determine if past failures of the Susitna Glacier fault have consistently induced rupture of the Denali fault.
Article
The MW 7.0, 12 January 2010, Haiti earthquake triggered more than 7,000 landslides in the mountainous terrain south of Port-au-Prince over an area that extends approximately 50 km to the east and west from the epicenter and to the southern coast. Most of the triggered landslides were rock and soil slides from 25°-65° slopes within heavily fractured limestone and deeply weathered basalt and basaltic breccia. Landslide volumes ranged from tens of cubic meters to several thousand cubic meters. Rock slides in limestone typically were 2-5m thick; slides within soils and weathered basalt typically were less than 1 m thick. Twenty to thirty larger landslides having volumes greater than 10,000 m3 were triggered by the earthquake; these included block slides and rotational slumps in limestone bedrock. Only a few landslides larger than 5,000 m3 occurred in the weathered basalt. The distribution of landslides is asymmetric with respect to the fault source and epicenter. Relatively few landslides were triggered north of the fault source on the hanging wall. The densest landslide concentrations lie south of the fault source and the Enriquillo-Plantain-Garden fault zone on the footwall. Numerous landslides also occurred along the south coast west of Jacmél. This asymmetric distribution of landsliding with respect to the fault source is unusual given the modeled displacement of the fault source as mainly thrust motion to the south on a plane dipping to the north at approximately 55° landslide concentrations in other documented thrust earthquakes generally have been greatest on the hanging wall. This apparent inconsistency of the landslide distribution with respect to the fault model remains poorly understood given the lack of any strong-motion instruments within Haiti during the earthquake.