Today, citizenship both as target and life quality benchmark of societies and governments’ legitimacy has increased in importance. Citizenship’s acquired and extension aspects require scrupulous attention of urban systems (including urban management, urban governments, urban states, urban organizations, urban officials and municipalities) to benefit from urban citizenization policies in order to develop a form of relationship between officials with both citizens and the city, that yield the best way of living in the city and dealing with the city’s complex issues. Actualization of citizenship to the fullest requires enjoyment of the rights and fulfillment of responsibilities by all citizens, regardless of their gender, race, age, religion, health, social status, economic status and cultural status. Moreover, citizen-centered planning and executing, which significantly rely on quantitative and qualitative data, is of urban management responsibilities that can be of great assistance as well. For the sake of future planning, following the overview of theoretical subjects about disability and citizenship based on urban management frameworks, the present article attempts to provide data about disability status in Tehran. Like the part of the society who due to hereditary diseases, natural illnesses, accidents, sociocultural circumstances and environmental conditions lose some of their abilities, the disabled suffer from a higher rate of death than others. In under development countries, the disabled are deprived of the services (such as health, education, skill training and job search services) that are accessible to others. Disabled adults’ income is dwarfed by non-disabled adults’ income. Having a disabled kid cripples the married life and negatively affects other members of the family. Of social and economic features accompanying disability are poverty and deprivation. According to findings, fifteen percent of Iran’s disabled population live in Tehran, ninety percent of whom live in urban areas. Districts 12, 19 and 10 in order, rank the highest in disability. Analyzed by districts' regions; Region 3 of district 4, region 9 of district 2 and region 1 of district 1 host the lowest number of the disabled per one-thousand population. Whereas, Region 4 of district 19, region 9 of district 1, region 6 of district 20, region 4 of district 12 and region 1 of district 15 accommodate the biggest number of the disabled.