ArticlePDF Available

A fatal anal impalement

Authors:
1
Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock I 8:3 I Jul - Sep 2015
Anal-perineal impalements are infrequent and potentially life-
threatening injuries. Mortality rates are related to the severity of
the trauma. Treatment requires a wide colo-proctological surgical
expertise. A similar nonfatal case involving rectum, bladder,
mesentery, liver, and right lung was recently published in 2012.[2]
Most of the other reported cases are case series of pediatric
patients victim of sexual abuse.[3] The surgical treatment of anal-
perineal impalement can be problematic when serious vascular
lesions have been caused, or multiple organs are involved;
besides, uncomfortable sequelae such as urinary incontinence,
anal sphincter dysfunction, and colonic diversion are frequent.[4]
Our case highlights how complex the management of an anal
impalement can be when the pelvis, abdomen, and thorax are
involved simultaneously. For a correct management of such
kind of lesions, a multidisciplinary approach to deal with the
various injuries is needed, and the penetrating object must not
be displaced until the surgical procedure has not begun. Novel
approaches have been suggested, for example, in a recent case,
authors report the successful implementation of a laparoscopic
approach for a pediatric impalement injury.[5]
Fausto Fama’, Alessandra Villari,
Dario Lo Presti, Maria Gioffre’-Florio
Department of Human Pathology “Gaetano Barresi”,
University Hospital of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
E-mail: famafausto@yahoo.it
REFERENCES
1. Orr CJ, Clark MA, Hawley DA, Pless JE, Tate LR, Fardal PM. Fatal anorectal
injuries: A series of four cases. J Forensic Sci 1995;40:219-21.
2. Ho LC, El Shafei H, Barr J, Al Kari B, Aly EH. Rectal impalement
injury through the pelvis, abdomen and thorax. Ann R Coll Surg Engl
2012;94:e201-3.
3. Sugar NF, Feldman KW. Perineal impalements in children: Distinguishing
accident from abuse. Pediatr Emerg Care 2007;23:605-16.
4. Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, Apostolidis S, Paramythiotis D,
Ioannidis A, Mekras A, et al. Surgical management of colorectal injuries:
Colostomy or primary repair? Tech Coloproctol 2011;15:S63-6.
5. Hammond PJ, Jackson MJ, Jaffray B. Laparoscopic primary repair of a
pediatric transanal impalement injury: a case report. J Laparoendosc Adv
Surg Tech A 2007;17:813-4.
A fatal anal impalement
Dear Editor,
Anal impalements are infrequent injuries, and generally involve
only gastrointestinal, urinary or genital pelvic structures. They
are rarely fatal. Only one previous fatal case was reported in the
literature in 1995.[1] We report a rare case of fatal impalement,
to our knowledge, the second one to be ever described in the
literature.
A 63-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department
after an accident occurred in his garden. He presented a trans-
anal impalement by a metallic rod [Figure 1] and a complex
wound in the left-side thoracic wall [Figure 2]. On arrival,
consciousness was preserved despite the low blood pressure.
The only immediate therapy started was uid resuscitation.
Unfortunately, the patient died for a severe hemorrhagic shock.
Letters to Editor
Figure 1: Entrance penetrating wound
Figure 2: Exit penetrating wound with a severe lesion in the left-
side sub-clavicular region
Access this article online
Quick Response Code:
Website:
www.onlinejets.org
DOI:
10.4103/0974-2700.161660
[Downloaded free from http://www.onlinejets.org on Saturday, August 29, 2015, IP: 192.167.105.229]
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Impalement rectal injuries with intraperitoneal organ injuries are rare. It is even rarer for such injuries to result in pelvic, abdominal and thoracic internal injuries. We present the case of a 39-year-old man who was admitted after an assault where a broken broomstick was inserted forcibly into his rectum. Surgery revealed penetration through the rectum, dome of the bladder, mesentery, liver and right lung. The patient survived following management by a multispecialty surgical team. Our literature review identified four similar cases with one fatality only. Prognosis seems to be good in these types of injuries provided there is an early presentation, the penetrating object is left in situ before the operation and, most importantly, there is an organised team approach to deal with the various injuries.
Article
Full-text available
Several factors have been considered important for the decision between diversion and primary repair in the surgical management of colorectal injuries. The aim of this study is to clarify whether patients with colorectal injuries need diversion or not. From 2008 to 2010, ten patients with colorectal injuries were surgically treated by primary repair or by a staged repair. The patients were five men and five women, with median age 40 years (20-55). Two men and two women had rectal injuries, while 6 patients had colon injuries. The mechanism of trauma in two patients was firearm injuries, in two patients was a stab injury, in four patients was a motor vehicle accident, in one woman was iatrogenic injury during vaginal delivery, and one case was the transanal foreign body insertion. Primary repair was possible in six patients, while diversion was necessary in four patients. Primary repair should be attempted in the initial surgical management of all penetrating colon and intraperitoneal rectal injuries. Diversion of colonic injuries should only be considered if the colon tissue itself is inappropriate for repair due to severe edema or ischemia. The role of diversion in the management of unrepaired extraperitoneal rectal injuries and in cases with anal sphincter injuries is mandatory.
Article
Anorectal injuries associated with sexual practices have become more frequently reported in the last decade. Although anorectal injuries are commonly reported in cases of sexual abuse of children, fatalities are very rare. In this series of cases, we report a case of fatal child abuse resulting from anal intercourse. In addition, there are two cases of death in females as a result of heterosexual "fisting" or "handballing." The fourth case of the series is that of a homicidal injury produced by rectal impalement with a 31 inch length of threaded pipe.
Article
Perineal impalements are uncommon and potentially life-threatening injuries. Medical providers must evaluate the risk of child abuse in all cases of genital or anal trauma. Determination of abuse depends on medical assessment of the mechanism of injury and statements by the child and witnesses, and may require collaboration with police or child protection agencies for scene investigation. To describe circumstances, medical findings, and child protection issues raised in accidental pediatric perineal impalement injuries. Retrospective case series selected from the authors' own practices and from submissions through an international list-serve of child abuse physicians. All cases included were determined to be accidental. Thirty-four cases were identified. Children ranged in age from 13 months to 14 years, 59% were girls. Most injuries occurred in the home (24/34, 71%), and more than one third (13/34, 38%) occurred in the bathroom. Most children had examination under anesthesia (26/34, 77%), many required surgical repair (20/34, 59%), and 4 had bowel perforations. Multidisciplinary assessment regarding child abuse was used in 71% (24/34) of cases. Inspection of the impaling objects or the scene was accomplished by medical providers or police in 50% (17/34) of cases. Ambulatory children can sustain accidental perineal impalement injuries, and severe internal injuries may accompany minor external findings. History from supervising adults and from other child witnesses, examination of the impaling objects, and investigation of the scene may be required to reach the conclusion of accidental injury.
Article
Conventional treatment of anorectal impalement injuries involves an open exploration and either a fecal diversion and/or a primary repair dictated by the degree of soft-tissue disruption and contamination. In this paper, the authors present the case report of a successful primary laparoscopic repair of an accidental transanal intraperitoneal impalement injury in a child.
Perineal impalements in children: Distinguishing accident from abuse
  • Nf Sugar
  • Kw Feldman
Sugar NF, Feldman KW. Perineal impalements in children: Distinguishing accident from abuse. Pediatr Emerg Care 2007;23:605-16.
Perineal impalements in children: Distinguishing accident from abuse
  • N F Sugar
  • K W Feldman
Sugar NF, Feldman KW. Perineal impalements in children: Distinguishing accident from abuse. Pediatr Emerg Care 2007;23:605-16.