ArticlePDF Available

Earthquake in Haiti: The Failure of Crisis Management?

Authors:

Abstract

The 2010 earthquake in Haiti provides a real-life framework that highlights the political realities of responding to mass emergencies and also reveals some of the limitations of the extant literature on crisis management in facilitating global response in the immediate aftermath of major disasters. Recently, researchers in the field of emergency management and disasters (e.g., Boin, 2009; Drabek, 2007; Shalev et al., 2000) have outlined issues that need to be addressed by crisis managers, policymakers, and government officials. This article discusses some of the premises regarding the critical lack of crisis management factors (e.g., modeling, agency coordination and integration, crisis planning, leadership functions) that limit the efficacy of the role of national initiatives related to the preparedness for, response to, recovery from, and mitigation of major natural disasters.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Earthquake in Haiti: A Failure in Crisis Management?
Piotrowski, Chris
Organization Development Journal; Spring 2010; 28, 1; ABI/INFORM Global
pg. 107
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
... A persistent failure of emergency management research is the inability to translate findings into practice (Piotrowski, 2010). The majority of research exploring disaster management has tended to focus on identifying general challenges to emergencies via observations and interviews. ...
Article
Full-text available
Major emergencies are extreme team decision making environments. They are complex, dynamic, high-stakes and fast paced events, wherein successful resolution is contingent upon effective teamwork. Not only do emergency teams coordinate at the intrateam level (e.g., police team), but they are increasingly required to operate at the interteam level (e.g., police, fire and ambulance teams). This is in response to the desire for networked and cost-effective practice and due to the evolving nature of modern threats, such as extreme weather events and terrorist attacks, which require a multi- rather than single-agency response. Yet the capacity for interoperability between emergency teams is under researched and poorly understood. Much of the teamwork research is based on student-samples or in artificial lab settings, reducing the salient contextual demands of emergencies (e.g., high-stakes, meaningful risk). Furthermore, the minimal research that has been conducted has tended to provide broad descriptive accounts of challenges faced during emergencies, but failed to develop and test solutions. This article identifies what is known about emergency teams and highlights why it is an important and timely area for research. It will focus on the challenges and solutions to three areas of team processing: cooperation, coordination, and communication. Future research must have a solutions-focused approach. This can be oriented around areas: training, sociotechnical networks, and policies/procedural guidelines. Greater collaboration between academics and practitioners can grow knowledge in this domain, ensuring that interventions to improve emergency teamwork are both contextually grounded and empirically validated.
... 61 Also the different aid organizations themselves did not appear to be well integrated and suffered from bureaucracy. 62 Cluster organization lacked flexibility. Targeting errors partly undermined voluntary work, and volunteers distributing e.g. ...
... examples of where lack of preparedness and poor communication and coordination hindered the effectiveness of relief efforts. Although each of these events received global media coverage and an outpouring of support from the international community, history continued to repeat itself as one response effort after another suffered from unfortunate missteps ( Funabashi and Kitazawa, 2012;Kahn and Barondess, 2008;Piotrowsky, 2010). Evidence that poor disaster response and mitigation is a global problem can be found in the literature. ...
Article
The purpose of this study is to discover how coordination and communication between the government and service organisations responsible for the relief effort following Hurricane Katrina contributed to the poor outcomes for the communities impacted by the storm. Two hypotheses were tested in this study: communication was positively correlated with the degree of coordination immediately following Katrina; and miscommunication was negatively correlated with the degree of coordination after the storm. Quantitative content analysis of media reports was used to analyse the data and test the hypotheses. Both communication and miscommunication were found to be positively correlated with coordination. The results of this study suggest that increasing interorganisational communication and establishing clearly defined roles for organisations must be a high priority in revamping organisational protocol on disaster response if any new approach is to be successful. © 2015 The Author(s). Disasters © Overseas Development Institute, 2015.
Chapter
A holistic and critical approach to the disaster cycle/disaster-development continuum may provide a better opportunity to address the root cause of vulnerability, but an uncritical strategy may do more harm than good. The concept of vulnerability or vulnerable groups should not inadvertently create the risk of group discrimination but paying attention to the root causes of the dynamism and vulnerability of certain groups could provide us with lasting solutions for disaster management. Recovery, mitigation and preparedness are essential, but planning, leadership and coordination are crucial to ensure that there is effective and sustainable disaster reduction. Climate change has an influence in extreme weather events resulting in disasters, and this needs urgent interventions in the context of disaster management, while also bearing in mind that there are constraints and challenges with regard to addressing the issue of climate change and its influence on disasters. There needs to be prioritisation of psychological consequences for disaster preparedness and response, while at the same time we also need to be cautious of instrumentalising decisions because managing disaster may be complex, multidimensional and individually unique. The health sector can best contribute to mitigation against and preparation for possible future food shortage crises by influencing political decision-making and facilitating multi-stakeholder partnerships to ensure that there is adequate resource allocation and capacity to address the issue of food shortages. The known strategies and frameworks of mitigation against and preparation for future food shortage crises are all important, but we need to be aware that nutritional concerns in low-income and middle-income countries are diverse, and the burden of diseases can complicate the whole picture and create a novelty of food shortage. Early warning systems can be more useful if they are linked to and complemented by timely response mechanisms.
Article
Since the first publication of the Organization Development Journal in 1983, the emergence of internationally-focused articles has been a key feature in the diffusion of knowledge among readers. Throughout its 28-year span, approximately every issue published has contained research about the application and progress of International OD. With time, however, the presence of international articles has continued a rollercoaster-like trend (see Table 1). This article provides a glance into the impact of International OD over time as seen in the ODJ.
Research
Full-text available
I conducted this capstone project as a culminating experience for my masters in public health.
Article
Purpose – The aim of this paper is to identify the core issues that organisational leaders are facing internationally, as a result of a globalised and rapidly changing international economic environment. Appropriate leadership competencies and skills that enable organisational leaders to effectively deal with these core globalisation issues are examined in detail and are further explained through a conceptual model developed for the purpose of this study. Design/methodology/approach – Conventional content analysis of extant literature in the leadership, management, organisational development and human resource management fields delimited this study to the identification of three core issues, their sub‐dimensions and associated organisational leadership effectiveness strategies. Findings – This study presents a conceptual model consolidating current scholarly understanding of the international imperatives affecting twenty‐first century organisational leaders and describes “best practice” leadership skills, competencies and models that will enable managers to lead effectively in a rapidly changing, globalised market‐place. Originality/value – The simplicity and explicitness of the descriptive‐based conceptual model represented in this review offers an original approach to the link between theory and practice in international organisational leadership, while acting to simplify the perplexing array of viewpoints on leadership approaches. A number of research alternatives are suggested that may lead to the formation of a more predictive “international imperative” model.
Article
The objective of this project is to examine the relationships that occur during collaboration and cooperation amongst multiple agents (government, military, non-governmental) in the immediate aftermath of major natural catastrophes requiring the deployment of extensive humanitarian relief efforts. Specifically, the process of collaboration and the formation of interagency relationships and the effect on the humanitarian supply chain's efficiency in providing aid immediately in devastated areas and the creation of positive social relationships that spur the process of healing and recovery amongst local populations and aid providers. Furthermore, with military organizations having an increasing role in providing aid, and the involvement of non-governmental organizations as specialists in disaster relief, these relationships have a large effect on the ability and success of a humanitarian operation in providing relief efficiently in terms of time, money and lives. Often the same conflicts reoccur resulting in wasted efforts of "reinventing the wheel" and protecting organizational interests instead of expending energies in providing aid.
Article
Full-text available
The main tenet of Chaos Theory is that, from a conceptual-process perspective, dysfunctional systems and apparent disarray and displacement are a normal aspect of adaptation to high-stress conditions. Part I of this article presents research from the scholarly literature that supports the contention that, in large part, the disorganization of personal, social, organizational, and political systems in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina is part of the adaptation process of making order out of chaos. In fact, much of the empirical research from distinct areas such as disaster recovery, crisis management in business, and psychosocial aspects of stress embrace the conceptual and theoretical framework of Chaos Theory. Due to rapidly changing developments, Part II of this series, on recovery and reconstruction efforts post-Katrina, will appear as a separate paper in an upcoming issue of ODJ.
Article
Full-text available
ABSTRACT The field of crisis management currently faces two important limitations. First, this field has been distinguished by two major approaches to date, crisis management planning and analysis of organizational contingencies. However, despite what we have learned from these approaches, neither seems to lead to a crisis management learning model that fosters organizational resilience in coping with crises. Secondly, researchers have studied a number,of events ,as case ,studies but have never ,synthesized ,these case studies. Consequently, each crisis seems idiosyncratic and administrators continue to repeat the same errors when,a crisis occurs. The research proposal presented in this paper , aims,to remove these limitations by bringing together two apparently opposing fieldsof study, that ofcrisis management, characterized by what are perceived as specific events, and that of organizational development, characterized by the strengthening of organizations’ capacities tocope,with lasting changes. This paper proposes ,to explore ,their potential to work together theoretically and empirically through a research design. 1,IMPORTANCE OF THE SUBJECT
Article
Full-text available
Colleges and universities are faced with disasters and crises from many causes. Care-ful and thorough advance planning strongly affects how quickly institutions respond and recover from them. This article provides an overview of key steps in preparing for and responding to disasters and crises. It is a Sunday night in September. You are checking a weather Web site, comparing computer models that show a Category-4 hurricane meandering through the Gulf of Mexico. Data indicate that the storm is strengthening, and computer models show possible landfall over an area of several hundred miles. Your organization is in the landfall zone in some models but not others. The storm is projected to hit in about 72 hr. You are a leader in your organization. What do you do? Although this sounds like a case simulation, it is not. It is the situation that con-fronted me in September 2004 just before Hurricane Ivan devastated Pensacola and inflicted damage on the University of West Florida that remains the worst ever in Florida history. However, this is not an isolated incident from a leadership per-spective. Similar situations confront organizational leaders more often than you might think. Although hurricanes have dominated the headlines for the past several months, disasters and crises of many types affect organizations: tornadoes, earth-quakes, floods, fires, blizzards, ice storms, chemical spills, armed intruders, em-ployee violence, student problems, and various other types of events. It is not a matter of whether a disaster or emergency scenario will confront an organization, but when. The purpose of this article is to share some lessons learned by an experienced executive leadership team. While holding senior leadership positions at the Uni-versity of Delaware, the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, and the Uni-versity of West Florida (UWF), I experienced six major hurricanes and several other situations involving, among other things, individuals claiming to be armed, employee-on-employee violence, students blocking the entrances to the adminis-tration building, and violent behavioral outbursts by students in classrooms. On the recent weather front, between September 2004 and September 2005, UWF experi-enced Hurricanes Ivan, Dennis, and Katrina, as well as tropical storms Arlene and Cindy. Consequently, I have confronted numerous emergency situations requiring rapid decisions. I have overseen several campus evacuations and extended closures that threatened the institution's academic program and ability to continue operat-ing. In Hurricane Ivan alone, on UWF's main campus, 95% of all buildings and 110 of 114 classrooms had to be partially or completely rebuilt, while the campus and community infrastructure—water, electricity, sewage, and communications— was completely lost for extended periods. Amazingly, and with nothing short of Herculean efforts by staff and contractors, the university was back in operation in 3 weeks; just barely able to salvage the fall 2004 semester. Dealing with the long-term trauma people faced was a humbling and daunting experience that con-tinues well over 1 year after the storm. What does it take to successfully lead an organization during a crisis? If your best response to the opening scenario was to ask whether there was a disaster plan, it is unlikely that you would be successful. Based on my experience, I believe that to be successful, your organization and its leaders must demonstrate four elements: 1. Planning that is comprehensive and fully integrated. 2. Decisiveness through a willingness to make tough choices. 3. Execution based on extensive knowledge of the plan. 4. Personal touch in remembering that people and their safety are primary.
Article
Full-text available
Hurricanes Erin and Opal struck the same coastal region in the Northwest Florida Panhandle in late summer of 1995. The study examined the stressors that most affected small businesses in the region in the aftermath of the storms. Power outages, telephone disruptions, employees' availability, debris removal, and lack of customers were the major problem areas reported by business owners (N = 57 of 500 potential respondents). The results indicate that most of the stress factors were transitory and the findings are discussed in light of Murphy's 1985 conceptual model of disaster research.
Article
Full-text available
From a larger study, ratings of satisfaction with disaster relief agencies in the aftermath of Hurricanes Erin and Opal showed high satisfaction from services provided by the American Red Cross/Salvation Army and somewhat lower ratings for the Federal Emergency Management Agency from 167 residents and business owners in the Florida Panhandle.
Article
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to address the significance of trans-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary collaboration, and local community participation in redevelopment efforts. Design/methodology/approach – In order to illustrate this model of redevelopment, the rebuilding efforts in Maldives in the aftermath of the 2004 tsunami, are presented as a case study. The efforts of the Government of Maldives and several NGOs are explored and critiqued, and a novel model for redevelopment is conceptualized. The paper utilizes a comprehensive review of literature, news articles, press releases and structured interviews to gather information and provide a framework for reconstruction and redevelopment plan in Maldives. Findings – When communities are impacted by natural disasters or developmental challenges, workers from various disciplines are brought together to assist in social reconstruction. Interdisciplinary collaboration and community involvement are key to fostering significant and sustainable changes in under-developed communities. The Government of Maldives has set up the National Disaster Management Center to coordinate such transdiciplinary efforts and services. The current redevelopment plan is presented and a model for trans-disciplinary collaboration is proposed by the author. Practical implications – While immediate attention must be paid to restoring basic living conditions and re-establishing local infra-structure, long-term efforts must focus on capacity building, increased resilience, disaster management and community empowerment. In the aftermath of the devastating tsunami, many communities are in need of coordinated and well planned models of redevelopment to ensure sustainable change and meaningful recovery. Originality/value – This paper proposes an innovative, participatory model of redevelopment that can be adapted to other communities devastated by natural disasters.
Article
This paper identifies institutional failure as the root cause for underdevelopment and susceptibility to disasters and explores their interdependent relationship. It is demonstrated that only if a country's governance structure enables the implementation and enforcement of public policies conducive to a country's economic and social development can sustainable livelihoods be achieved and susceptibility to disasters be reduced. Accountability, participation, predictability and transparency are identified as the key features of a governance structure that fosters development and supports risk reduction.
Article
We investigated the association between PTSD symptom levels and sociodemographic characteristics, earthquake survival, and related losses, and post-earthquake life events 4Â years after two major earthquakes in Turkey in a sample of children and adolescents who emigrated from the devastated area. The study subjects consisted of 1999 earthquake survivors who moved to Ankara, Turkey, at the time of the study. The inclusion criteria included age ranging from 8 to 18Â years and the absence of a serious cognitive or mental disorder that would interfere with response to self-report questionnaires. Regarding the earthquake experiences, unexpectedly, the findings indicate a significant association between posttraumatic stress, depression, fear and avoidance symptoms and only one of five subscales of Earthquake Experiences Scale, namely Functionality, even after controlling for the post-earthquake life events. Impact of earthquake was not found to predict psychological symptoms. Children and adolescents' subjective perception of the earthquake was an associated factor with higher posttraumatic stress and depression scores. Impact of earthquake was not found to predict psychological symptoms. We conclude that the level of PTSD symptoms in children and adolescents who survived a major earthquake is determined by the negative impact of the trauma on functionality and the degree of subjective negative perception about earthquake. Additional studies of PTSD in survivors of other types of major trauma are required to provide the interventions most effective for those individuals.
Article
Many studies reported deficits in cognitive functions in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Most were, however, conducted on man-made trauma survivors. The high comorbidity of alcohol use and depression with PTSD in these studies further complicated the interpretation of their results. We compared prefrontal lobe functions and memory in three earthquake survivor groups: current PTSD, past PTSD and no PTSD. We hypothesized that prefrontal performances of the current and past PTSD groups would be worse than that of control group. Survivors of the 1999 earthquakes in Turkey were evaluated for current and lifetime PTSD. Memory and prefrontal functions were assessed by a neuropsychological test battery. Current PTSD patients performed worse on attention, verbal memory, verbal fluency, and psychomotor speed. Past PTSD group was similar to the controls on most cognitive measures, except for their vulnerability to proactive interference and low performance in verbal fluency for animal names. Our findings indicate that the prefrontal organization and monitorization of verbally processed information are defective in earthquake-related PTSD patients, more so in the current PTSD group.
Article
Developing nations experience pervasive risk of devastation, human and property loss resulting from human and natural disasters. This level of risk is attributable to socioeconomic stress, aging and inadequate physical infrastructure, weak education and preparedness for disaster and insufficient fiscal and economic resources to carefully implement the preparedness, response, mitigation and recovery components of integrated emergency management. This article examines these dynamics using a conceptual framework derived from chaos theory and emergency management theory and raises several critical methodological issues related to inquiries into disaster and emergency management dynamics in developing nations.