Conference PaperPDF Available

An Expanded Version of the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale (The Maladaptive Covert Narcissism Scale)

Authors:

Abstract

The purpose of the present research was to improve the reliability and item content of the recently popular Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale (HSNS; Hendin & Cheek, 1997) by expanding it into a more complete measure of maladaptive covert narcissism. In an Amazon Mechanical Turk survey of 420 adults, the 23-item expanded version of the Maladaptive Covert Narcissism Scale (MCNS) had an alpha reliability of .89 compared to .75 for the original HSNS, and it correlated .65 with the MMPI composite measure of covert narcissism. In our second sample of 182 college women, the MCNS had an alpha of .85, a correlation of .66 with the MMPI measure of covert narcissism, and similar correlations with the Big Five Inventory scales as found for the original HSNS by Hendin and Cheek (1997). Overall, the present results indicate that the new scale represents a significant improvement in the assessment of maladaptive covert narcissism. [Cheek, J.M., Hendin, H.M., & Wink, P.M. (2013, June). An expanded version of the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale (The Maladaptive Covert Narcissism Scale). Presented at the meeting of the Association for Research in Personality, Charlotte, NC.]
1
Association for Research in Personality - June 2013 Poster - Charlotte NC
Poster Title: An Expanded Version of the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale
(The Maladaptive Covert Narcissism Scale)
Corresponding Name: Jonathan M. Cheek
Author Email: jcheek@wellesley.edu
Affiliation: Wellesley College
Mailing Address: Department of Psychology, 106 Central St, Wellesley, MA 02481
Phone: 781-283-3130
Other Authors Names: Holly M. Hendin, Paul M. Wink
Affiliations: Phoenix Neurological Associates, Wellesley College
Poster Abstract
The fundamental distinction between overt and covert narcissism in the normal range of individual
differences (e.g., Wink, 1991) finally has become accepted in personality and social psychological
research (e.g., Miller et al., 2011). These two factors or “faces” of maladaptive narcissism were named
Grandiosity-Exhibitionism (overt) and Vulnerability-Sensitivity (covert) by Wink. Hendin and Cheek
(1997) constructed a new scale by correlating items from Murray’s (1938) Narcism Scale with a
composite of the two MMPI-based measures of covert narcissism used in Wink’s research. The resulting
10-item measure was named the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale (HSNS). According to PsycINFO, the
Hendin and Cheek (1997) article was cited only 15 times in the first 10 years after its publication but
more than 80 times since 2007. The purpose of the present research was to improve the reliability and
item content of the recently popular HSNS by expanding it into a more complete measure of maladaptive
covert narcissism.
In an Amazon Mechanical Turk survey of 420 adults, the 23-item expanded version of the Maladaptive
Covert Narcissism Scale (MCNS) had an alpha reliability of .89 compared to .75 for the original HSNS; it
correlated .65 with the MMPI measure of covert narcissism compared to .30 with the maladaptive overt
narcissism factor of the NPI and -.16 with the Adaptive Overt Narcissism Scale (Cheek, Wink,
Hargreaves, & Derr, 2013). As may be seen in Table 2, correlations with shame divided overt and covert
maladaptive narcissism (.02 vs. .58) and correlations with entitlement rage connected overt and covert
maladaptive narcissism (.55 and .64). The new MCNS showed very similar correlations with the Big Five
Inventory scales as the original HSNS had in Hendin and Cheek (1997) except for a substantially more
negative correlation with conscientiousness. In our second sample of 182 college women, the MCNS had
an alpha of .85, a correlation of .66 with the MMPI measure of covert narcissism, and similar correlations
with the Big Five Inventory scales except for a more modest negative correlation with conscientiousness
(-.16; these results are not show in Table 2).
Overall, the present results indicate that the new scale represents a significant improvement in the
assessment of maladaptive covert narcissism.
Cheek, J.M., Hendin, H.M., & Wink, P.M. (2013, June). An expanded version of the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale
(The Maladaptive Covert Narcissism Scale). Presented at the meeting of the Association for Research in Personality,
Charlotte, NC.
2
References for text and tables
Cheek, J.M., & Hendin, H.M. (1996, August). Shyness, narcissism, and shame. In D.L. Paulhus (Chair),
Social cognition of shyness and social anxiety. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the
American Psychological Association, Toronto.
Cheek, J.M., Wink, P.M., Hargreaves, K.M., & Derr, J.L. (2013, July). Distinctions among overt, covert
and adaptive types of narcissism: Conceptualization and measurement. Presented at the annual meeting of
the American Psychological Association, Honolulu.
Glover, N., Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Crego, C., & Widiger, T. A. (2012). The five-factor narcissism
inventory: A five-factor measure of narcissistic personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94,
500-512.
Fossati, A., Borroni, S., Grazioli, F., Dornetti, L., Marcassoli, I., Maffei, C., & Cheek, J. (2009). Tracking the
hypersensitive dimension in narcissism: Reliability and validity of the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale.
Personality and Mental Health, 3, 235-247.
Hendin, H. M., & Cheek, J. M. (1997). Assessing hypersensitive narcissism: A reexamination of Murray's
Narcism Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 588-599.
Hill, P. L., & Lapsley, D. K. (2011). Adaptive and maladaptive narcissism in adolescent development. In
C. T. Barry, P. K. Kerig, K. K. Stellwagen, T. D. Barry (Eds.), Narcissism and Machiavellianism in
youth: Implications for the development of adaptive and maladaptive behavior (pp. 89-105). Washington,
DC US: American Psychological Association.
John, O. P., & Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The “Big Five” Inventory—Version 41 and 54
(Technical Report). Berkeley, California: University of California, Institute of Personality Assessment
and Research.
Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Campbell, W. (2011). Grandiose
and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network of analysis. Journal of Personality, 79, 1013-1042.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pincus, A. L., Ansell, E. B., Pimentel, C. A., Cain, N. M., Wright, A. C., & Levy, K. N. (2009). Initial
construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21, 365-
379.
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory
and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890-902.
Robbins, S. B. (1989). Validity of the Superiority and Goal Instability scales as measures of defects in the
self. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 122-132
Wink, P. (1991). Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 590-597.
Wink, P. (1992). Three narcissism scales for the California Q-set. Journal of Personality Assessment,
58, 51-66.
3
Table 1: Item characteristics of the Maladaptive Covert Narcissism Scale
Items
Loading on
First
Unrotated
Factora
Item correlation
with remainder
of scaleb
1. I can become entirely absorbed in thinking about my personal
affairs, my health, my cares or my relations to others.
.34
.29
2. My feelings are easily hurt by ridicule or by the slighting remarks
of others.
.52
.44
3. When I enter a room I often become self-conscious and feel that
the eyes of others are upon me.
.56
.47
4. I dislike sharing the credit of achievement with others.
.45
.35
5. I feel that I have enough on my hands without worrying about
other people's troubles.
.43
.45
6. I feel that I am temperamentally different from most people.
.41
.27
7. I often interpret the remarks of others in a personal way.
.58
.42
8. I easily become wrapped up in my own interests and forget the
existence of others.
.45
.36
9. I dislike being with a group unless I know that I am appreciated
by at least one of those present.
.54
.28
10. I am secretly annoyed when other people come to me with their
troubles, asking me for my sympathy.
.40
.34
11. I am jealous of good-looking people.
.51
.49
12. I tend to feel humiliated when criticized.
.58
.48
13. I wonder why other people aren't more appreciative of my good
qualities.
.53
.33
14. I see other people as being either great or terrible.
.47
.41
15. I sometimes have fantasies about being violent without knowing
why.
.49
.30
16. I am especially sensitive to success and failure.
.53
.40
17. I have problems that nobody else understands.
.57
.56
18. I try to avoid rejection at all costs.
.57
.41
19. My secret thoughts, feelings, and actions would horrify some of
my friends.
.53
.56
20. I tend to become involved in relationships in which I alternately
adore and despise the other person.
.46
.47
21. Even when I am in a group of friends, I often feel very alone
and uneasy.
.63
.36
22. I resent others who have what I lack.
.60
.58
23. Defeat or disappointment usually shame or anger me, but I try
not to show it.
.59
.38
Note. The first 10 items are the HSNS and the next 13 items were added to make the 23-item MCNS;
these two sets of item correlated .76 with each other (N = 420).
a. N = 420 adult men and women; b. N = 182 college women
4
Table 2: Correlations among Measures of Narcissism and with Emotion and Big 5 Scales
Adaptive
Overt
Narcissism
Scale
AONS
Adaptive
Narcissistic
Personality
Inventory-
10 items
Maladaptive
Overt
Narcissism
Scale
MONS
MMPI
Covert
Narc.
Com-
posite
Maladaptive
Covert
Narcissism
Scale
MCNS
AONS
(.88)
Adaptive
NPI-10
.49
(.78)
Maladaptive
NPI-20
.19
.58
MONS
.15
.45
(.78)
MMPI Covert
-.22
-.11
.19
(.72)
MCNS
-.16
-.03
.45
.65
(.89)
Entitlement
Rage (PNI)
-.08
.24
.55
.43
.64
Shame
(FFNI)
-.22
-.24
.06
.49
.58
Self Esteem
(Rosenberg)
.47
.26
-.08
-.61
-.54
Neuroticism
-.23
-.25
.00
.60
.58
Extraversion
.48
.49
.16
-.30
-.30
Openness
.62
.12
-.06
-.06
-.10
Agreeable-
ness
.19
-.09
-.34
-.37
-.48
Conscient-
iousness
.38
.14
-.23
-.44
-.44
Note. Numbers in parentheses are alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability for each scale.
N = 420; Correlations > +/- .10 are statistically significant p < .05.
Sample means and standard deviations by gender for the 23-item MCNS
Females M = 66.70 SD = 14.93 (n = 249)
Males M = 68.40 SD = 13.96 (n = 171) [t(418) = 1.18, ns]
From Wellesley data:
College women M = 67.69 SD = 12.83 (n = 582)
5
The Maladaptive Covert Narcissism Scale (MCNS; Cheek, Hendin, & Wink, 2013)
[The first 10 items are the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale (HSNS; Hendin & Cheek 1997)]
Please answer the following questions by deciding to what extent each item is characteristic of your
feelings and behavior. Fill in the blank next to each item by choosing a number from the scale printed
below.
1 = very uncharacteristic or untrue, strongly disagree
2 = uncharacteristic
3 = neutral
4 = characteristic
5 = very characteristic or true, strongly agree
____ 1. I can become entirely absorbed in thinking about my personal affairs, my health, my cares or my
relations to others.
____ 2. My feelings are easily hurt by ridicule or by the slighting remarks of others.
____ 3. When I enter a room I often become self-conscious and feel that the eyes of others are upon me.
____ 4. I dislike sharing the credit of an achievement with others.
____ 5. I feel that I have enough on my hands without worrying about other people's troubles.
____ 6. I feel that I am temperamentally different from most people.
____ 7. I often interpret the remarks of others in a personal way.
____ 8. I easily become wrapped up in my own interests and forget the existence of others.
____ 9. I dislike being with a group unless I know that I am appreciated by at least one of those present.
____ 10. I am secretly "put out" or annoyed when other people come to me with their troubles, asking me
for my time and sympathy.
____ 11. I am jealous of good-looking people.
____ 12. I tend to feel humiliated when criticized.
____ 13. I wonder why other people aren't more appreciative of my good qualities.
____ 14. I tend to see other people as being either great or terrible.
6
MCNS, continued
1 = very uncharacteristic or untrue, strongly disagree
2 = uncharacteristic
3 = neutral
4 = characteristic
5 = very characteristic or true, strongly agree
____ 15. I sometimes have fantasies about being violent without knowing why.
____ 16. I am especially sensitive to success and failure.
____ 17. I have problems that nobody else seems to understand.
____ 18. I try to avoid rejection at all costs.
____ 19. My secret thoughts, feelings, and actions would horrify some of my friends.
____ 20. I tend to become involved in relationships in which I alternately adore and despise the other
person.
____ 21. Even when I am in a group of friends, I often feel very alone and uneasy.
____ 22. I resent others who have what I lack.
____ 23. Defeat or disappointment usually shame or anger me, but I try not to show it.
... Others have pointed out that narcissism may be a complex and multifaceted construct, with different subtypes or dimensions [25,26]. Indeed, some have suggested that there may be important distinctions to be made between overt and covert forms of narcissism [27,28]. ...
... To further explore these two forms of narcissism, researchers have used a range of measures, including the Profile of Narcissistic Dispositions (POND) and Kohut measures of grandiosity and idealization [26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. These measures have been used to identify three clusters of narcissism: overt, adaptive, and covert. ...
... The overt narcissism group is characterized by high scores on all of the POND dimensions, medium scores on the pathology of separation/individuation, and low scores on idealization and grandiosity. This group displays a pattern of behavior consistent with the classic symptoms of overt narcissism, including a grandiose sense of self-importance, arrogance, and a flagrant display of superiority [26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. The adaptive narcissism group, on the other hand, reports a range of low, high, and medium scores on each of the narcissism measures, with the pathology of separation/individuation scale having the lowest mean score. ...
Article
Full-text available
The relationship between narcissistic personality and art and beauty appreciation has recently become the focus of research investigations. Adaptive narcissists raise their sense of worth in order to shield themselves from harm caused by others. Because they aspire to be more attractive, healthier, and successful versions of themselves, they frequently have greater success in life than the majority of people. Grandiose and overtly narcissistic behavior are the main recognized characteristics of an overt narcissist, which is currently regarded as a personality disorder that puts mental health and wellbeing at peril. On a random sample collection of data from 1101 respondents to an online questionnaire, we conducted a network analysis of the Adaptive Overt Narcissism Scale (AONS) items. In this study, we used a network analysis approach to examine the network structure of adaptive overt narcissism, as well as its relationships with psychological functioning. The present study utilized network analysis to investigate the centrality measures of items in the Adaptive Overt Narcissism Scale (AONS) and their interrelationships. Results indicated that item Q6.8 (“I appreciate art and beauty”) had low betweenness, closeness, and strength centrality measures, indicating that it was less influential in the network. However, it also had negative expected influence, suggesting that its absence would have a destabilizing effect on the network. These results highlight the importance of the appreciation of art and beauty in deactivating the adaptive overt narcissist network. Further research is needed to explore the mechanisms underlying this relationship and its implications for narcissism prevention and intervention.
... Currently the most widespread measure of grandiose narcissism is the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI; Raskin and Terry, 1988;Cain et al., 2008), although several other psychometrically sound measures were introduced in recent years (e.g., the Narcissistic Grandiosity Scale NGS; Rosenthal et al., 2007). Separate measurement of vulnerable narcissism is also supported (e.g., the Maladaptive Covert Narcissism Scale; Cheek et al., 2013 or the Narcissistic Vulnerability Scale; NVS; Crowe et al., 2018), moreover several measures are assessing the two dimensions as facets of one instrument e.g., the Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI; Pincus et al., 2009); or the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory (FFNI; Glover et al., 2012). ...
... The MCNS (Cheek et al., 2013) is a Likert-type measure assessing hypersensitive or vulnerable narcissism. It consists of 23 items with answer options ranging from one to five. ...
... It consists of 23 items with answer options ranging from one to five. This scale is considered as a significantly improved version (Cheek et al., 2013) of the original Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale (Hendin and Cheek, 1997). The MCNS was administered in Sample 1 and Sample 3. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Narcissism viewed as a personality process rather than a stable trait explains narcissistic functioning as a tool for maintaining a positive self-view. Studying narcissism therefore needs adequate momentary measures for collecting higher frequency longitudinal data in experience sampling method (ESM) studies. In this study, a shorter version of the Pathological Narcisissm Inventory is offered to measure vulnerable and grandiose narcissistic states, applicable in momentary assessment. Methods The measurement tool was tested in three samples. First, we assessed the factor structure and associations with other contemporary measures of narcissism in a cross-sectional design on one English speaking (n = 319) and one Hungarian sample (n = 236). Second, we conducted a five-day long experience sampling method study with a total of 15 measurement points (n = 123). Results Based on structural equation modelling and multilevel analyses, the results suggest that the measure has adequate psychometric properties in both the within and between subject levels as well as acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. Conclusions The Pathological Narcissism Inventory – State Version (PNI-S) can be a useful tool in momentary data collection enabling the examination of personality processes behind narcissistic functioning.
... The Maladaptive Covert Narcissism Scale was developed by Cheek et al. (2013) to measure covert/vulnerable narcissism. The test contains a total of 23 items, incorporating items from the earlier Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale (Hendin & Cheek, 1997). ...
... Respondents are asked to rate, on a 5-point Likert scale, the extent to which a given statement is typical of them, where 1 represents "not typical at all", and 5 means "very typical". The Cronbach's alphas of the scale, measured on two independent samples, were 0.85 and 0.89, respectively (Cheek et al., 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
Currently our understanding of environmental factors that influence the development of dark personality traits (DT) is limited. Therefore, we conducted three studies using online questionnaires, each examining a different aspect of the relation between dark personality traits and family environment. In Study 1, 117 adults (mean age: 30.36 years, SD = 10.19) filled out questionnaires regarding their childhood relationship with siblings and their own DT traits. We found that the amount of conflicts with siblings during adolescence correlated positively with Machiavellianism and psychopathy. The feeling of closeness towards the siblings showed negative correlation with Machiavellianism. Parental partiality towards the other sibling was positively correlated with narcissism. In Study 2, 111 adolescents (mean age: 15.92, SD = 1.24) reported their perceptions of the rearing style of their parents, in addition to their sibling relationships and DT traits. Perceived parental emotional warmth was negatively associated, whereas both rejection and overprotection were positively correlated with psychopathy. Parental warmth was positively, while rejection negatively associated with narcissism. Machiavellianism was positively associated with the amount of conflicts with siblings, but negatively with closeness to siblings. In Study 3, 110 adults (mean age: 32.62 years, SD = 12.25) reported their levels of the Vulnerable Dark Triad that included measures of primary and secondary psychopathy, maladaptive covert narcissism, and borderline personality organization. Results indicated that sibling relation quality had a significant effect on primary psychopathy and borderline traits. Parental rejection and overprotection correlated with borderline traits and vulnerable narcissism. The results of these studies shed some light on how environmental impulses, particularly the quality of relationships between family members, affect the development of personality.
... We assessed vulnerable narcissism using the extended version of the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale (HSNS; Hendin & Cheek, 1997), the 23item Maladaptive Covert Narcissism Scale (MCNS; Cheek et al., 2013). ...
... The German 5 and Japanese versions were translated and back-translated to English by the authors, supported by German/Japanese and English/ Japanese bilinguals. The internal consistency was α = 0.89 for the German and α = 0.83 for the Japanese sample, indicating good reliability (which was markedly higher than for the original 10-item version; Cheek et al., 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
Narcissism can manifest in a grandiose form-admiration-seeking, exhibitionism, and dominance-or a vulnerable form-anxiety, withdrawal, and hypersensitivity. While grandiose narcissism is conceptually in line with an independent self-construal, as prevalent in Western countries, the vulnerable form can be assumed to relate more to an interdependent self-construal, as prevalent in Eastern countries. We studied both forms of narcissism in Germany and Japan (Ns = 258, 280), which differ fundamentally in their independent and interdependent self-construal, yet are similar regarding global developmental standards. We tested whether (1) mean differences in both narcissism forms would conform to the predominant self-construal, (2) self-construal would explain variance in narcissism beyond broad personality traits, and (3) there would be stronger mental health tradeoffs for culturally incongruent forms of narcissism. Our results largely confirm these expectations for vulnerable narcissism, which is (1) more prevalent in Japan than Germany, (2) related to self-construal beyond broad traits, and, (3) more strongly related to mental health problems in Germany than Japan. For grandiose narcissism, data analyses indicated that construct equivalence can only be assumed for the entitlement factor, and internal structure and nomological networks differ substantially between cultural contexts.
... The Maladaptive Covert Narcissism Scale (MCNS) developed by Cheek et al. (2013) was used to measure covert narcissism. It was known to have high internal consistency of α = .95 ...
... The HSNS [29] is a 23-item self-report measure that assesses the level of hypersensitivity, vulnerability and entitlement in which the items are scored on a 1 (Disagree strongly) to 5 (Agree strongly) Likert-type scale. The higher scores re ect higher levels of hypersensitivity and vulnerability (M = 54.632; ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Currently narcissism is considered one of the most widespread modern "diseases". As a consequence, its different types (grandiose and vulnerable narcissism) have been approached from several different perspectives. The present research attempts to investigate the differences between the two types of narcissism and their links with different cognitive components that are connected to these personality traits. The primary aim of our study is to investigate the maladaptive schemas (entitlement, vulnerability, emotional deprivation) and cognitive evaluation systems (self-esteem, systemizing-empathizing) associated with narcissism. In order to ensure the associations of the observed constructs, we used correlational and a specific form of structural equation modelling (SEM), pathway analysis. The results show that the early maladaptive schemas have a large impact on the development of narcissism and on the empathizing system. The different subtypes of narcissism have different effects on self-esteem, while gender and age have a minor effect on self-esteem and the empathizing system too. Hopefully, these empirical results can be applied in counselling as well as in clinical practice.
... The result was the 10-item Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale (Hendin & Cheek, 1997). Despite not receiving much initial popularity-it was cited only 15 times in the decade following its introduction (Cheek et al., 2013)-it now appears to be the favoured instrument among researchers looking for a brief assessment of vulnerable narcissism. ...
Article
The study of aversive or ‘dark’ personality traits (e.g., Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy) is afflicted by three types of issues. Measures of aversive traits that are meant to assess the same traits often capture different content—an issue of jingle. Measures that are meant to assess different traits often capture near‐identical content—an issue of jangle. Finally, disagreement over what unites aversive personality traits leads to different conclusions about what is and is not an aversive personality trait—an issue of conceptual centrality. This study outlines how decomposing personality traits into smaller elements can address these three issues. It also provides a primer on the history and assessment of these traits and sets an agenda for future research.
... First, there are some measurement limitations. The validity of the HSNS (as a measurement of vulnerable narcissism) has been discussed and is considered controversial (Cheek et al., 2013). Additionally, this tool does not allow a distinction to be made between antagonistic narcissism and neurotic narcissism. ...
Article
Full-text available
The objective of the current study was to examine the relations between narcissism and Adler’s community feeling. Based on theoretical considerations, we claim that community feeling can be treated as an opposite pole of narcissism and we expected that: (1) both grandiose and vulnerable narcissism would be negatively related to community feeling and that (2) grandiose and vulnerable narcissism would be positively related to anti-community domination and isolation. A sample of 520 university students (Mage = 21.37, SDage = 4.31) completed the Community Feeling Questionnaire (CFQ), the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire (NARQ) and the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale (HSNS). Structural equation modeling largely confirmed our expectations. These results suggest that narcissism can be understood in terms of a deficit in community feeling. It turned out that community feeling and narcissism are related constructs but they are not reducible to each other.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The present scale development results indicate initial success in constructing a reliable new self-report measure of adaptive overt narcissism that is distinct from measures of covert and maladaptive overt narcissism. The Adaptive Overt Narcissism Scale (AONS) also is substantially more correlated with self-esteem than existing subscales of the NPI that have been used to assess moderately “healthy” or adaptive narcissism. Cheek, J.M., Wink, P.M., Hargreaves, K.M., & Derr, J.L. (2013, July). Distinctions among overt, covert and adaptive types of narcissism: Conceptualization and measurement. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu.
Article
Full-text available
A new measure of hypersensitive narcissism was derived by correlating the items of H. A. Murray's (1938) Narcism Scale with an MMPI-based composite measure of covert narcissism. In three samples of college students (total N 403), 10 items formed a reliable measure: the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale (HSNS). The new HSNS and the MMPI-based composite showed similar patterns of correlations with the Big Five Inventory, and both measures correlated near zero with the Narcissistic Personality Inventory, which assesses overt narcissism. Results support P. Wink's (1991) distinction between covert and overt narcissistic tendencies in the normal range of individual differences and suggest that it would be beneficial for personality researchers to measure both types of narcissism in future studies. (Hendin, H.M., & Cheek, J.M. (1997). Assessing Hypersensitive Narcissism: A Reexamination of Murray's Narcism Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 588-599.)
Article
Full-text available
The aim of the study was to assess the reliability and the validity of the Italian translation of the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale (HSNS) in a sample of consecutively admitted psychiatric outpatients (N = 366) and in an independent sample of non-clinical volunteers (N = 385). In both samples, data from the HSNS had adequate internal consistency, considering its limited length. Consistent with our hypothesis, a two-factor structure explained the HSNS item intercorrelations. Among clinical participants, the HSNS and the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) showed radically different patterns of correlations with the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) Personality Disorder diagnoses. In both samples, the HSNS and the NPI showed distinct and theoretically consistent correlations with temperament and character dimensions. As a whole, these findings seem to support the reliability and the validity of the HSNS as a measure of hypersensitive narcissism. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Article
Full-text available
This study provides convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity data for a new measure of narcissistic personality traits created from the perspective of the Five-factor model (FFM) of general personality structure. Fifteen scales were constructed as maladaptive variants of respective facets of the FFM (e.g., Reactive Anger as a narcissistic variant of angry hostility), with item selection made on the basis of a criterion-keying approach using results from 167 undergraduates. On the basis of data from 166 additional undergraduates, the convergent validity of these 15 scales was tested with respect to 8 established measures of narcissism (including measures of both grandiose and vulnerable narcissism) and the respective facets of the FFM. Discriminant validity was tested with respect to facets from other FFM domains. Incremental validity was tested with respect to the ability of the FFM narcissism trait scales to account for variance in 2 alternative measures of narcissism, after variance accounted for by respective NEO PI-R facet scales and other established measures of narcissism were first removed. The findings support the validity of these new scales as measures of narcissistic personality traits and as maladaptive variants of the FFM.
Article
Full-text available
The construct of narcissism is inconsistently defined across clinical theory, social-personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. Two problems were identified that impede integration of research and clinical findings regarding narcissistic personality pathology: (a) ambiguity regarding the assessment of pathological narcissism vs. normal narcissism and (b) insufficient scope of existing narcissism measures. Four studies are presented documenting the initial derivation and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI). The PNI is a 52-item self-report measure assessing 7 dimensions of pathological narcissism spanning problems with narcissistic grandiosity (Entitlement Rage, Exploitativeness, Grandiose Fantasy, Self-sacrificing Self-enhancement) and narcissistic vulnerability (Contingent Self-esteem, Hiding the Self, Devaluing). The PNI structure was validated via confirmatory factor analysis. The PNI correlated negatively with self-esteem and empathy, and positively with shame, interpersonal distress, aggression, and borderline personality organization. Grandiose PNI scales were associated with vindictive, domineering, intrusive, and overly-nurturant interpersonal problems, and vulnerable PNI scales were associated with cold, socially avoidant, and exploitable interpersonal problems. In a small clinical sample, PNI scales exhibited significant associations with parasuicidal behavior, suicide attempts, homicidal ideation, and several aspects of psychotherapy utilization.
Article
Full-text available
The present study examines the lack of strong correlations among existing self-report measures of narcissism. A principal-components analysis of 6 MMPI narcissism scales resulted in 2 orthogonal factors, 1 implying Vulnerability-Sensitivity and the other Grandiosity-Exhibitionism. Although unrelated to each other, these 2 factors were associated with such core features of narcissism as conceit, self-indulgence, and disregard of others. Despite this common core, however, Vulnerability-Sensitivity was associated with introversion, defensiveness, anxiety, and vulnerability to life's traumas, whereas Grandiosity-Exhibitionism was related to extraversion, self-assurance, exhibitionism, and aggression. Three alternative interpretations of these results are considered, and an argument for the distinction between covert and overt narcissism is made.
Article
ABSTRACT Evidence has accrued to suggest that there are 2 distinct dimensions of narcissism, which are often labeled grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Although individuals high on either of these dimensions interact with others in an antagonistic manner, they differ on other central constructs (e.g., Neuroticism, Extraversion). In the current study, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis of 3 prominent self-report measures of narcissism (N=858) to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the resultant factors. A 2-factor structure was found, which supported the notion that these scales include content consistent with 2 relatively distinct constructs: grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. We then compared the similarity of the nomological networks of these dimensions in relation to indices of personality, interpersonal behavior, and psychopathology in a sample of undergraduates (n=238). Overall, the nomological networks of vulnerable and grandiose narcissism were unrelated. The current results support the need for a more explicit parsing of the narcissism construct at the level of conceptualization and assessment.
Article
Three observer-based narcissism scales were developed from factor scores based on a California Q-set (CAQ) narcissism prototype. Each of the three scales--Willfulness, Hypersensitivity, and Autonomy--correlated with observer and self-report narcissism measures in the derivation sample of 105 women and a cross-validation sample of 175 men and 175 women. California Psychological Inventory (CPI), Adjective Check List (ACL), and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) correlates and partner ACL ratings suggested that the Willfulness scale represents self-assuredness, rebelliousness, and exhibitionism characteristic of overt or phallic narcissism. The correlates of the Hypersensitivity scale included depression and introversion along with rebelliousness and hostility, indicative of covert narcissism. The Autonomy scale was correlated positively with creativity, empathy, achievement-orientation, and individualism, and thus assesses a healthy variant of narcissism.