ArticlePDF Available

SHORT COMMUNICATION: Sparsely encrusted hardground in the Darriwilian calcareous sandstone of Cape Pakri, NW Estonia (Baltica)

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The occurrence of echinoderm and ptilodictyid bryozoan holdfasts on the surface of Darriwilian calcareous sandstone in northwestern Estonia indicates that it was lithified before encrustation. Pelmatozoans outnumber the bryozoans and cover a larger area of the hardground although both are very sparse. The hardground is very sparsely encrusted (0.37% of the total area studied) and lacks signs of bioerosion.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2015, 64, 3, 249–253 doi: 10.3176/earth.2015.31
249
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Sparsely encrusted hardground in the Darriwilian calcareous sandstone
of Cape Pakri, NW Estonia (Baltica)
Olev Vinn
Department of Geology, University of Tartu, Ravila 14A, 50411 Tartu, Estonia; olev.vinn@ut.ee
Received 17 February 2015, accepted 13 May 2015
Abstract. The occurrence of echinoderm and ptilodictyid bryozoan holdfasts on the surface of Darriwilian calcareous sandstone
in northwestern Estonia indicates that it was lithified before encrustation. Pelmatozoans outnumber the bryozoans and cover a
larger area of the hardground although both are very sparse. The hardground is very sparsely encrusted (0.37% of the total area
studied) and lacks signs of bioerosion.
Key words: hardgrounds, encrustation, cementation, Middle Ordovician, Baltica.
INTRODUCTION
Hardgrounds form excellent attachment surfaces for
encrusting and bioeroding organisms that otherwise
must dwell on carbonate cobbles or the exoskeletons
of various invertebrates. Carbonate hardgrounds are
synsedimentarily cemented carbonate layers that have
been exposed on the seafloor (Wilson et al. 1992). They
were relatively common in calcite seas, such as those
of the Ordovician, due to favourable conditions for
early cementation of carbonate sediments in the seafloor
(Wilson & Palmer 1992). Upper Ordovician hardground
faunas were dominated by bryozoans and echinoderms,
but cornulitid tubeworms and sphenothallids were also
common (Wilson 1985; Taylor & Wilson 2003). The
Ordovician hardground faunas of Baltica have been
described both from Russia and Sweden (Vishnyakov &
Hecker 1937; Rozhnov 2000; Blake & Rozhnov 2007;
Eriksson et al. 2012). Trypanites borings have been
reported from the Ordovician hardgrounds in Estonia
(Orviku 1940, 1960; Einasto 1964; Põlma 1984; Saadre
1992, 1993). The earliest hardground faunas of Baltica
include Trypanites, Gastrochaenolites? and Balanoglossites
from the latest Early Ordovician (Vinn & Wilson 2010;
Knaust & Dronov 2013). Ripple marks, associated
with the hardground in the Vasalemma quarry, were
described in detail by Hints & Miidel (2008). They also
mentioned the occurrence of Trypanites borings and the
edrioasteroid echinoderm Cyathocystis.
The aims of this paper are (1) to describe for the first
time a hardground echinoderm–bryozoan community
from the Darriwilian of Baltica and (2) to compare the
hardground fauna from the Darriwilian of Estonia with
other Ordovician examples.
GEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND AND
LOCALITY
The area of modern Estonia (Fig. 1) was covered by
a shallow epicontinental sea in the Ordovician. The
Ordovician sequence of North Estonia is represented
mostly by carbonate rocks except for the terrigenous
Lower Ordovician part. Ordovician rocks, mainly lime-
stones, are exposed in northern Estonia as a wide belt
from the Narva River in the east to Hiiumaa Island in
the west (Mõtus & Hints 2007). Drift of Baltica from
the southern high latitudes to the tropical realm caused
a drastic climatic change. The warming of the climate
increased the sedimentation rate of carbonates. Deposits
characteristic of arid and subtropical climate appeared
in the Late Ordovician (Mõtus & Hints 2007; Dronov &
Rozhnov 2008). In the Early and Middle Ordovician,
when the Baltic Basin was situated in the temperate
climate zone, these types of tropical deposits were
completely lacking (Jaanusson 1973).
Pakri Cliff is situated on the western coast of the
Pakri Peninsula in NW Estonia (Fig. 1). The hardground
was studied at the northern border of the town of Paldiski.
It is the second hardground from the top of the Pakri
Formation and forms a surface within the formation
(Fig. 1), which is detectable throughout the several
kilometres long Pakri Cliff section. The Pakri Formation
is about 1 m thick at Pakri Cliff and is composed of
carbonate-cemented sandstone and sandy limestone. It
represents the most onshore environment known from
the carbonate part of the Ordovician of Estonia. The
calcareous sandstones of the formation formed in a
very shallow subtidal environment close to the ancient
coastline (Põldsaar & Ainsaar 2014). These sandstones
Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2015, 64, 3, 249–253
250
are rich in gastropods, cephalopods, brachiopods and
trilobites. The calcareous sandstones of the Pakri Formation
are overlain by limestones of the Kandle Formation,
which have a thickness of about 0.10 m (Põldsaar &
Ainsaar 2014).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The encrusted hardground was discovered during
extensive field work at Pakri Cliff in 2013. Several
kilometres of coast below the cliff were carefully searched
Fig. 1. A, location of Pakri Cliff in NW Estonia. B, Pakri Cliff with the studied hardground in the Pakri Formation (Darriwilian).
Modified after Hints et al. (2008). C, the Middle Ordovician in Estonia. Location of the hardground within the Pakri Formation.
Modified after Hints et al. (2008).
O. Vinn: Encrusted hardground from the Darriwilian
251
for hardground surfaces exposed on boulders broken
from the cliff. The total hardground surface available
for the study measures 1260 cm2. The hardground surface
in the cliff is very hard to reach due to heavy cementation
and falling rocks. The cliff is under natural protection
and the removal of large parts of it to reach the hard-
ground surface is not permitted. The hardground surface
was cleaned with a brush and water and photographed
in sunlight with a scale bar. Macroscopic encrusters
were counted and identified. Signs of bioerosion and
small encrusters were searched for using a 10 magni-
fication lens. Only two echinoderms and a bryozoan
holdfast were collected due to the hard rock matrix.
They are deposited at the Natural History Museum
(Geological Museum), University of Tartu (TUG),
with specimen numbers TUG 1681-1, TUG 1681-2 and
TUG 1681-3.
RESULTS
Five discoidal echinoderm holdfasts and a ptilodictyid
bryozoan holdfast are cemented to the hardground surface
within the Pakri Formation (Darriwilian) (Fig. 2). The
hardground surface is darker in colour than rest of the
rock matrix due to pyrite impregnation. It is not smooth
and has a relatively low and irregularly shaped micro-
relief (Fig. 2). It lacks obvious signs of bioerosion and is
sparsely encrusted. The encrusters cover only 4.65 cm2
(0.37%) of the total hardground surface studied
(1260 cm2). Echinoderms cover 3.45 cm2 and bryozoans
1.2 cm2 of the hardground surface. Pelmatozoans out-
number bryozoans and cover a larger area of the
hardground.
A single large discoidal holdfast is 26 mm wide and
has a circular outline (Fig. 2A). It is strongly elevated
(up to 3.0 mm) above the hardground surface. The
holdfast has a relatively smooth surface. A few weakly
developed short shallow radial furrows are found at the
periphery of the holdfast in some places. The holdfast
has a large shallow central depression (about 9 mm
in diameter) that is surrounded by a slightly elevated
narrow rim. The holdfast is assigned to echinoderms
because of its circular outline, relatively smooth surface
and shallow central depression (Wilson et al. 1992).
Five small discoidal holdfasts have a circular outline
(Fig. 2B). They have a mostly unornamented surface
with weakly developed irregular relief in some places.
Their holdfasts are relatively flat, not much elevated
above the surface of the hardground. One small discoidal
holdfast shows a weakly developed central pit which
is about 1/4 as wide as the holdfast. The holdfasts are
assigned to echinoderms because of their circular outline,
relatively smooth surface and lack of radial ornamentation
(Wilson et al. 1992).
The single large semi-circular holdfast is 13.0 mm
wide and covered with radial ridges that bifurcate and
intercalate (Fig. 2B). About two ridges per 1 mm are
found along the periphery. The surface of the holdfast is
only slightly elevated above the hardground surface.
The holdfast is assigned to ptilodictyid bryozoans because
of its semi-circular outline and radial ornamentation
composed of bifurcating and intercalating ridges (Wilson
et al. 1992).
Fig. 2. A, hardground surface; Ech, large echinoderm holdfast, Pakri Formation, Darriwilian, Middle Ordovician, Pakri Cape,
N
W Estonia. TUG 1681-1. B, hardground surface; a ptilodictyid bryozoan holdfast (br) (TUG 1681-2) and small echinoderm
holdfast (ech) (TUG 1681-3) cemented to the hardground from the Pakri Formation, Darriwilian, Middle Ordovician,
N
W Estonia.
Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2015, 64, 3, 249–253
252
DISCUSSION
Sedimentology
The occurrence of echinoderm and bryozoan holdfasts
indicates that a surface of calcareous sandstone within
the Pakri Formation was lithified before encrustation.
The hardground seems to be slightly abraded and has
few cryptic surfaces and broken off cobbles. The darker
colour of the hardground surface is presumably caused
by post-sedimentation mineralization by iron minerals,
probably pyrite. The hardground formed in normal marine
conditions in relatively shallow water as it was close to
the supposed shoreline to the north (Jaanusson 1973).
Preservation
The Pakri Cliff holdfasts show signs of slight erosion.
No echinoderm stem fragment was found attached to the
holdfasts. This indicates that there was some hydro-
dynamic activity above the hardground surface.
Encrustation and diversity of the association
The Pakri hardground is very sparsely encrusted (Brett
& Liddell 1978). The slightly older hardground fauna
from the Middle Ordovician of Utah (Wilson et al.
1992) has similar diversity. The nearly equal areas of
the Utah hardground were covered by bryozoans and
echinoderm holdfasts (Wilson et al. 1992). The Pakri
hardground bryozoans are among the earliest bryozoans
known from the hardgrounds of Baltica or elsewhere
(O. Vinn pers. obs.). Bryozoans are known from the
Billingen and Hunneberg of Baltica (Koromyslova 2011).
The lack of cornulitids in the Pakri association is most
striking, but their earliest representatives in Baltica are
known from the latest Darriwilian. Thus, the lack of
cornulitids can be explained by their later appearance
in the Ordovician of Baltica. Microconchids, which are
characteristic of many Early Palaeozoic hard substrate
faunas that appeared in the Late Ordovician (Zatoń &
Vinn 2011), are similarly absent in the Pakri association.
Bryozoans usually form an important part of Ordovician
hard substrate faunas (Taylor & Wilson 2003) and they
also occur in the Pakri fauna. The Pakri hardground
environment may have been atypical for the Ordovician
shallow sea carbonate hardgrounds. It presumably
represents a very shallow subtidal environment (Põldsaar
& Ainsaar 2014) with a lithified sand bottom (with
carbonate cement), unlike most other Ordovician lime-
stone hardgrounds. According to Orviku (1960),
Trypanites borings occur in the Pakri Formation. It is
surprising that the described hardground does not
contain Trypanites.
SUMMARY
A hardground in the calcareous sandstone of the
Pakri Formation is encrusted by bryozoans and
echinoderms. The association is dominated by
echinoderms.
The Pakri hardground differs from many other
Ordovician hardgrounds of Baltica by the lack of
bioerosion. It is possible that calcareous sandstone
may have been an unfavourable substrate for boring
organisms.
Acknowledgements. I am grateful to Mark A. Wilson for
advice on the identification of the holdfasts. This paper is a
contribution to IGCP 591 ‘The Early to Middle Palaeozoic
Revolution’. I am also grateful to Ingrid Vinn for help during
field work. Financial support was provided by the Palae-
ontological Association Research Grant, and Estonian
Research Council projects ETF9064 and IUT20-34. I am
grateful to journal editor D. Kaljo for useful remarks and to
C. E. Brett and A. V. Dronov for the constructive reviews.
REFERENCES
Blake, D. B. & Rozhnov, S. 2007. Aspects of life mode among
Ordovician asteroids: implications of new specimens
from Baltica. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 52, 519–
533.
Brett, C. E. & Liddell, W. D. 1978. Preservation and paleo-
ecology of a Middle Ordovician hardground community.
Paleobiology, 4, 329–348.
Dronov, A. V. & Rozhnov, S. 2008. Climatic changes in the
Baltoscandian Basin during the Ordovician: sedimento-
logical and palaeontological aspects. Acta Palaeontologica
Sinica, 46, 108–113.
Einasto, R. E. 1964. K voprosu o klassifikatsii i formirovanii
poverkhnostej pereryva [Formation and classification
of hardgrounds]. In Litologiya paleozojskikh otlozhenii
Éstonii [Lithology of Palaeozoic Sediments of Estonia],
pp. 123–131. Institut Geologii AN ESSR, Tallinn [in
Russian].
Eriksson, M. E., Lindskog, A., Calner, M., Mellgren, J. I. S.,
Bergström, S. M., Terfelt, F. & Schmitz, B. 2012. Biotic
dynamics and carbonate microfacies of the conspicuous
Darriwilian (Middle Ordovician) ‘Täljsten’ interval, south-
central Sweden. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
Palaeoecology, 367, 89–103.
Hints, L. & Miidel, A. 2008. Ripple marks as indicators of
Late Ordovician sedimentary environments in Northwest
Estonia. Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 57, 11–22.
Hints, O., Ainsaar, L., Männik, P. & Meidla, T. (eds). 2008.
The Seventh Baltic Stratigraphical Conference. Abstracts
and Field Guide. Geological Society of Estonia, Tallinn,
46 pp.
Jaanusson, V. 1973. Aspects of carbonate sedimentation in the
Ordovician of Baltoscandia. Lethaia, 6, 11–34.
Knaust, D. & Dronov, A. 2013. Balanoglossites ichnofabrics
from the Middle Ordovician Volkhov Formation
O. Vinn: Encrusted hardground from the Darriwilian
253
(St. Petersburg region, Russia). Stratigraphy and
Geological Correlation, 21, 265–279.
Koromyslova, A. V. 2011. Bryozoans of the Latorp and
Volkhov horizons (Lower–Middle Ordovician) of the
Leningrad Region. Paleontological Journal, 45, 887–980.
Mõtus, M.-A. & Hints, O. (eds). 2007. Excursion Guidebook.
10th International Symposium on Fossil Cnidaria and
Porifera. Excursion B2: Lower Paleozoic Geology and
Corals of Estonia. August 18–22, 2007. Institute of
Geology at Tallinn University of Technology, 66 pp.
Orviku, K. 1940. Lithologie der Tallinna-Serie (Ordovizium,
Estland) I. Acta Universitatis Tartuensis, A, 34, 1–249.
Orviku, K. 1960. O litostratigrafii volkhovskogo i kundaskogo
gorizontov v Éstonii [Lithology of the Volkhov and
Kunda stages in Estonia]. Akademiya Nauk Éstonskoj
SSR, Geologicheskij Institut, Trudy, 5, 45–87 [in Russian].
Põldsaar, K. & Ainsaar, L. 2014. Extensive soft-sediment
deformation structures in the early Darriwilian (Middle
Ordovician) shallow marine siliciclastic sediments formed
on the Baltoscandian carbonate ramp, northwestern
Estonia. Marine Geology, 356, 111–127.
Põlma, L. 1984. Sravnitel
naya litologiya karbonatnykh porod
ordovika severnoj i srednej Pribaltiki [Lithological
Comparison of Ordovician Carbonate Rocks of the
Northern and Middle East Baltic]. Valgus, Tallinn,
163 pp. [in Russian].
Rozhnov, S. V. 2000. Evolution of the hardground
community. In The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation
(Zhuravlev, A. Yu. & Riding, R., eds), pp. 238–253.
Columbia University Press, New York.
Saadre, T. 1992. Distribution pattern of the Ordovician
discontinuity surfaces, East Baltic region. Eesti Geoloogia-
keskuse Toimetised, 2, 16–26.
Saadre, T. 1993. Middle and Upper Ordovician discontinuity
surfaces in Northern Estonia (zonality based on their
impregnation type). Eesti Geoloogiakeskuse Toimetised,
3, 33–39.
Taylor, P. D. & Wilson, M. A. 2003. Palaeoecology and
evolution of marine hard substrate communities. Earth
Science Reviews, 62, 1–103.
Vinn, O. & Wilson, M. A. 2010. Early large borings from a
hardground of Floian–Dapingian age (Early and Middle
Ordovician) in northeastern Estonia (Baltica). Carnets de
Géologie, CG2010_L04.
Vishnyakov, S. G. & Hecker, R. F. 1937. Sledy razmyva
i vnutriplastovye narusheniya v glaukonitovykh
izvestnyakakh nizhnego silura Leningradskoj oblasti
[Traces of erosion and intrastratal dislocations in Lower
Silurian glauconite sandstones of Leningrad region]. In
Yubilejnyj sbornik k 45-letiyu nauchnoj deyatel
nosti
N. F. Pogrebova [Yubilee Collection Dedicated to 45
Years of Academic Activity by N. F. Pogrebov], pp. 30–
45. TSNIGRI [in Russian].
Wilson, M. A. 1985. Disturbance and ecologic succession in
an Upper Ordovician cobble-dwelling hardground fauna.
Science, 228, 575–577.
Wilson, M. A. & Palmer, T. J. 1992. Hardgrounds and
hardground faunas. University of Wales Aberystwyth
Institute of Earth Studies Publication, 9, 1–131.
Wilson, M. A., Palmer, T. J., Guensburg, T. E., Finton, C. D.
& Kaufman, L. E. 1992. The development of an Early
Ordovician hardground community in response to rapid
sea-floor calcite precipitation. Lethaia, 25, 19–34.
Zatoń, M. & Vinn, O. 2011. Microconchids and the rise of
modern encrusting communities. Lethaia, 44, 5–7.
Hõredalt asustatud muistne tsementeerunud kihipind Pakri poolsaare Ordoviitsiumist
Olev Vinn
Pakri pangal paljanduvast Kunda lademe lubi-liivakivist leiti kunagine tsementeerunud kihipind, mis oli hõredalt
asustatud sinna külge kinnitunud sammalloomade ja okasnahksetega.
... Cryptic surfaces in nautiloids (2.3-5.5% of the area) and trilobites (0.2-2.9% of the area) are usually somewhat more encrusted than the open surfaces of hardgrounds in the Ordovician of Estonia (0.02-1.3% of total hardground area; Vinn, 2015;Vinn and Toom, 2015). This may indicate the presence of some polarity in the encrustation den- istic for the Ordovician Baltic Basin (Vinn, 2015;Vinn and Toom, 2015). ...
... Cryptic surfaces in nautiloids (2.3-5.5% of the area) and trilobites (0.2-2.9% of the area) are usually somewhat more encrusted than the open surfaces of hardgrounds in the Ordovician of Estonia (0.02-1.3% of total hardground area; Vinn, 2015;Vinn and Toom, 2015). This may indicate the presence of some polarity in the encrustation den- istic for the Ordovician Baltic Basin (Vinn, 2015;Vinn and Toom, 2015). This could represent a palaeobiogeographic difference, caused by a slightly colder climate in Baltica during the Darriwilian and Sandbian and possibly by differences in faunal composition and sedimentation (Dronov and Rozhnov, 2008;Vinn and Toom, 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
This is the first report of encrusted cryptic surfaces in the Ordovician of Estonia. Only bryozoans and cornulitids occurred in nautiloids and trilobites. Bryozoans were the dominant encrusters, in terms of both the number of specimens and the encrustation area. Stalked echinoderms are common on the hardgrounds in the Middle and Upper Ordovician of Baltica, but the restricted space in nautiloid living chambers and trilobites probably prevented colonization by stalked echinoderms. Cryptic surfaces in nautiloids and trilobites usually are somewhat more encrusted than the open surfaces of hardgrounds in the Ordovician of Estonia. Encrusters presumably favoured cryptic surfaces, as these were less accessible for predators and grazers. Low encrustation densities, compared to North American hard substrates, seem to be characteristic for the Ordovician Baltic Basin.
... The observable hardground area is about 100 cm 2 , and about 12% of the area is covered by encrusters. Thus the hardground surface is rather densely encrusted for the Ordovician hardgrounds of Baltica (i.e., usually less than 1.3% of the hardground area is encrusted; Vinn, 2015;Vinn and Toom, 2015) and does not show any adverse effects of mass extinction on the process of encrustation. The encrustation area of studied hardground is similar to the Middle Ordovician Kanosh Shale hardground, where 10.5% of the area is covered by encrusters . ...
Article
Full-text available
A new cornulitid genus and species, Porkuniconchus fragilis new genus and species, is here described from the Ärina Formation (Hirnantian, Porkuni Regional Stage) of northern Estonia. This new taxon differs from most cornulitids by having a fusiform ornamentation pattern that is somewhat similar to that of Kolihaia . All studied specimens are attached to a carbonate hardground. The hardground fauna is by abundance and encrustation area dominated by cornulitids. Other encrusters are represented only by a single sheet-like cystoporate bryozoan. The cornulitid specimens represent different growth stages, which suggest that the hardground was continuously colonized by cornulitid larvae. The high encrustation density indicates that the studied hardground may have represented a high-productivity site in the Hirnantian of the Baltic Basin. UUID: http://zoobank.org/623afcc3-ab32-4e8f-be14-a1093cba4ae6
... Ordovician hard-substrate communities usually were dominated by bryozoans and echinoderms (Taylor and Wilson, 2003). The encrusting faunas of Estonian Ordovician hardgrounds recently have been studied in detail (Vinn, 2015;Vinn and Toom, 2015), but less is known about encrusters on biogenic substrates (Vinn et al., 2017). Empty nautiloid shells often were colonized by cryptic encrusters in the Ordovician of Estonia (Vinn et al., 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
A light grey nautiloid conch has a dark brown colony attached to its internal surface. This colonial fossil resembles hederellids and bryozoans, but is in fact a crustoid graptolite (Hormograptus? sp.). The colony has been lithoimmured inside this nautiloid conch by early cementation. Crustoid graptolites were a part of the encrusting communities in the Middle Ordovician of Baltica, but their abundance among encrusters of biogenic substrates reached a peak in the middle Sandbian. The cryptic mode of life appeared very early in the evolution of the crustoids. The discovery of this crustoid graptolite in a nautiloid conch indicates that the Baltic Middle Ordovician cryptic communities were taxonomically more diverse than was known previously. The nautiloid conch studied is sparsely encrusted with an encrustation density that is similar to those of other Middle Ordovician cryptic surfaces described from Estonia.
... This hardground is sparsely encrusted by bryozoans and echinoderms. No bioerosion has been reported [21]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The earliest bioeroded inorganic hard substrates in the Ordovician of Estonia appear in the Dapingian. Hardgrounds are also known from the Sandbian and Katian. Most of the bioero-sion of inorganic hard substrates occurs as the boring Trypanites Mägdefrau, 1932 along with some possible Gastrochaenolites borings. North American hardground borings are more diverse than those in Baltica. In contrast to a worldwide trend of increasing boring intensity, the Estonian record seems to show no increase in boring intensities during the Middle and Late Ordovician. Hardgrounds seem to be more common during the temperate climate interval of the Ordovician calcite sea in Estonia (seven hardgrounds during 15 my) than in the part with a tropical climate (four hardgrounds during 12 my). Bioerosion is mostly associated with carbonate hardgrounds, but cobbles and pebbles broken from the hard-grounds are also often penetrated by Trypanites borings. The general diversity of boring ich-notaxa in Baltica increased from one ichnospecies in the Cambrian to seven by the end of Ordovician, showing the effect of the GOBE on bioeroding ichnotaxa. The diversity of inorganic hard substrate borers increased by only two times. This difference can be explained by the wider environmental distribution of organic as compared to inorganic substrates in the Ordovician seas of Baltica, and their more continuous temporal availability, which may have caused increased specialization of several borers. The inorganic substrates may have been bioreroded only by the generalists among boring organisms.
Data
Full-text available
The following is a list of literature pertaining (broadly) to the ‘orthoceratite limestone’ of Sweden and coeval strata of the surrounding geographic region. This list forms a ‘living document’ that will be continually updated, and is by no means claimed to be complete. Many of the older publications can be found for free at PaleoArchive (www.paleoarchive.com).
Article
Full-text available
The nearshore Middle Ordovician (early Darriwilian) deposits of the Baltoscandian Basin, formed on the flank of tectonically stable Fennoscandian Shield, comprise numerous soft-sediment deformation structures. The areal extent of the deformed interval extends up to 9000 km2 from NW Estonia to SE Sweden. The deformation structures occur within a meter-scale sandstone horizon that includes load casts, flame structures, ball-and-pillow morphologies, up to 2 m wide sedimentary dykes, autoclastic breccias, sand volcanoes, and other related soft-sediment deformation structures. Evidently, these deformation structures formed during a single seismic event that caused liquefaction and fluidization of the water-saturated unconsolidated shallow marine sediments within almost the entire sandstone unit (Pakri Formation). Probably a unique catastrophic earthquake of magnitude 7 or higher occurred in this region penecontemporaneously with the deposition of these sediments. The ultimate cause of seismic event of such magnitude in the tectonically stable Baltoscandian Basin is unclear. However, deposition and deformation of the Pakri Formation fall within the Middle Ordovician meteoritic bombardment period which resulted from the disruption of a large parent body in the asteroid belt approximately 470 Ma ago. This in turn suggests a potential impact-origin for the single catastrophic earthquake in the tectonically stable study region. Although impact crater of suitable age is currently not known from the region, then previous studies have documented some impact metamorphic shock lamellae (i.e. PDFs) and abundant extraterrestrial chromite grains from the deformed sediments.
Article
Full-text available
The limestone succession of the Middle Ordovician Volkhov Formation in the St. Petersburg region (Russia) exposes numerous horizons with firm- and hardgrounds below omission surfaces, which contain trace fossils attributable to the ichnogenus Balanoglossites Mägdefrau, 1932. Although known from the literature since 75 years, such trace fossils were previously only informally described as “Korrosionsgruben”, “Karandashi”, or ascribed to different ichnotaxa such as Trypanites, Arenicolites and Pseudopolydorites. Owing to their complexity and often high bioturbation density, the morphology of these trace fossils is difficult to capture. Ichnofabrics containing Balanoglossites triadicus were studied in detail from sawn rock faces, broken rock blocks and sectioned slabs, including those from historical buildings in St. Petersburg. Accordingly, different trace-fossil elements can be revealed in dependence on the original substrate consistency, reflecting various stages of lithification: Mineral-stained and Trypanites-perforated hardground surfaces are bioeroded with long elongated grooves which are assigned to the ichnogenus Sulcichnus. Subtle openings lead into the partly lithified limestone where they branch into complex galleries of B. triadicus. They are characterized by J-, U- and Y-shaped shafts and multiply branched tunnels, which gradually continue into the underlying firmground. Other portions of the ichnofabric only exhibit biodeformational structures or the strongly compacted and branched burrow networks Labyrintichnus, which is due to the original soft sediment consistency. Balanoglossites ichnofabrics demarcate certain omission surfaces within the Dikari Limestone and can be traced for more than 300 km, supporting the regional lithostratigraphical correlation. The trace maker of B. triadicus and related trace fossils is interpreted to be a eunicid polychate with the ability to bioerode and burrow the sediment. The studied material from the Ordovician is similar to the Balanoglossites from the type area, the Triassic of Germany, in many respects. B. triadicus is a very common trace fossil in Ordovician and other Palaeozoic rocks of Baltoscandia and North America but so far has been seldom identified as such but instead is commonly confused with Thalassinoides, from which, however, it differs in several aspects.
Article
Full-text available
This monograph deals with the morphology of bryozoans of the orders Cystoporida and Trepostomida from the Latorp and Volkhov horizons (Lower–Middle Ordovician, Floian–Darriwilian stages) of the Leningrad Region. Diagnoses of some families belonging to these orders are revised. Based on morphological features of the bryozoans studied and on the succession of their taxa, four assemblages and three stages in their development are established. In addition, the stratigraphic and paleogeographic distributional patterns of bryozoans in the Lower and Middle Ordovician of the world are analyzed.
Article
Full-text available
The Kanosh Shale (Upper Arenig) of west-central Utah, contains abundant carbonate hardgrounds and one of the earliest diverse hardground communities. The hardgrounds were formed through a combination of processes including the development of early diagenetic nodules in clay sediments which were exhumed and concentrated as lags by storms. These cobble deposits, together with plentiful biogenic material, were cemented by inorganically precipitated calcite on the sea floor, forming intraformational conglomerate hardgrounds. Echinoderms may have played a critical role in the development of hardground faunas since their disarticulated calcite ossicles were rapidly cemented by syntaxial overgrowths, forming additional cobbles and hardgrounds. A significant portion of the hardground cements may have been derived from the early dissolution of aragonitic mollusk shells. The Kanosh community marks the transition from the Cambrian Fauna to the Paleozoic Fauna in the hardground ecosystem. -from Authors
Article
Limestone beds in the Middle Ordovician (Trentonian) Bobcaygeon Formation, exposed near Kirkfield, Ontario, exhibit irregular, bored and encrusted surfaces indicative of early lithification. These hardgrounds were formed in extensively burrowed carbonate sediments and their hummocky surface topographies were inherited, in part, from a pre-existing pattern of burrow tunnels. A diverse community, including bryozoans, brachiopods, crinoids, edrioasteroids, and paracrinoids, colonized these hard substrates. In addition, most surfaces are riddled with small, cylindrical boreholes ( Trypanites ) which represent dwellings of soft-bodied organisms. Some hardground surfaces were inhabited by multiple generations of organisms. Remains of the older generations of encrusters were strongly abraded and nearly obliterated. Superimposed upon these worn remnants are well-preserved remains of rather fragile organisms, e.g. complete hybocystitid crinoids and edrioasteroids. Evidently, certain hardground surfaces were rapidly buried by muds, resulting in the in situ preservation of the last generation of attached organisms. Slightly differing subcommunities of organisms inhabited various microhabitats provided by the irregular hardground surfaces. Thus, the relative abundance of bryozoans and echinoderms encrusting the roofs of small crevices differs from that on the exposed upper surfaces of the hardgrounds. This is the geologically oldest known hardground community in which microhabitat subdivision can be recognized. However, polarity between the subcommunities is not as pronounced as in geologically younger hard substrate faunas.
Article
Enclosed in the Darriwilian (Middle Ordovician) part of the reddish ‘orthoceratite limestone’ of Baltoscandia is a conspicuous c. 1.5 m thick unit colloquially known as the ‘Täljsten’ interval. It has a wide geographical distribution in the Baltoscandian paleocontinent but is particularly well exposed in south-central Sweden. The unit is characterized by its deviant gray color and beds with a mass occurrence of cystoid echinoderms. Moreover, the recent discovery of an anomalous abundance of extraterrestrial chromite grains and micrometeorites in the ‘Täljsten’ and immediately adjacent strata bear witness of a time of deposition correlating to an increased influx of extraterrestrial matter to Earth. In this study we analyze the faunal dynamics, based primarily on microfossils and carbonate microfacies, across this intriguing interval. Generally known as a macrolithologically monotonous succession, the ‘Täljsten’ proved more heterogeneous than previously believed in terms of fossil content and preservation, as well as mineral content and composition. The general texture is wackestone/packstone, but local heterogeneities are frequent. A microfaunal reorganization occurred with a transition from a trilobite- and brachiopod-dominated community to one dominated by echinoderms, which is mirrored also macroscopically by the cystoids. The latter pelmatozoans seem to have flourished and might even have aided in the formation of the numerous hardgrounds. The increase in echinoderms is linked to a Volkhovian increase in echinoderms in eastern Baltica. In the immediate post-‘Täljsten’ strata there is no distinct change back to the pre-‘Täljsten’ biota. Conodont and ostracod faunal diversity data reveal peak values in the ‘Täljsten’ compared to the enclosing strata, suggesting that the paleoenvironment was more suitable for higher diversity faunas of these metazoan groups. All data collectively support a regression in the beginning of the ‘Täljsten’, likely followed by transgression in its upper part.