ArticlePDF Available

Gnaphaliothamnus nesomii (ASTERACEAE, GNAPHALIEAE), a new species from GUATEMALA and nomenclatorial changes in the GNAPHALIINAE

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Gnaphaliothamnus nesomii M.O. Dillon & Luebert (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae) is a new species from the Sierra de los Cuchumatanes, Department Huehuetenango, Guatemala. The generic boundaries within the Gnaphalieae have been controversial and the genus Gnaphalio-thamnus has not been universally accepted. New molecular phylogenetic studies support the acceptance of Gnaphaliothamnus as distinct from Chionolaena, which is congruent with cypsela trichome morphology. Two Gnaphalium species are transferred as Pseudognaphalium stolonatum (S.F. Blake) M.O. Dillon and P. paramorum (S.F. Blake) M.O. Dillon.
Content may be subject to copyright.
J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 9(1): 63 – 73. 2015
GNAPHALIOTHAMNUS NESOMII (ASTERACEAE: GNAPHALIEAE),
A NEW SPECIES FROM GUATEMALA AND NOMENCLATORIAL CHANGES
Michael O. Dillon Federico Luebert
Botany Department Universität Bonn
The Field Museum Nees-Institut für Biodiversität der Pflanzen
1400 South Lake Shore Drive Meckenheimer Allee 170
Chicago, IL 60605, U.S.A. D-53115 Bonn, GERMANY
mdillon@fieldmuseum.org
abstr act
Gnaphaliothamnus nesomii M.O. Dillon & L uebert (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae) is a new species fr om the Sierra de los Cuchumat anes, De-
partment Huehuetenango, Guatemala. The generic boundaries w ithin the Gnaph alieae have been controversial and the genus Gnaphalio-
thamnus has not been universally accepted. New molecular phylogenetic studies support the acceptance of Gnaphaliothamnus as distinct
from Chionolaena, which i s congruent w ith cypsela tric home morphology. Two Gnaphalium species ar e transfer red as Pseudognaphalium
stolonatum (S.F. Blake) M.O. Dillo n and P. paramorum (S.F. Blake) M.O. Dillon.
key words: Chionolaena, Gamochaeta, Gnaphaliothamnus, Gnaphalium, Pseudognaphalium, Asteraceae, Gnaphal ieae, Gnaphalii nae, Guate-
mala, Lucilia-group, c omb. nov., sp. nov., Sierra d e los Cuchumata nes, taxonomy
resum en
Gnaphaliothamnus nesomii M.O. Dillon & Luebert (Asterace ae: Gnaphalie ae), es una nueva especie proveniente de Sierra de los Cuchu-
mata nes, Depart amento Huehuetenango, Guatem ala. Los límites genéricos e n Gnaphalieae son controvertido s y el género Gnaphaliotham-
nus no ha sido universalmente aceptado. Nuevos estudios filogenéticos molecul ares apoyan la aceptación de Gnaphaliothamnus como un
género diferente de Chionolaena, lo que es congruente con la morfología de los tricom as de las cipsel as. Dos e species de Gnaphalium son
tran sferidas c omo Pseudognaphalium stolonatum (S.F. Blake) M.O. Di llon y P. paramorum (S.F. Blake) M.O. Dillon.
palabras clave: Chionolaena, Gamochaeta, Gnaphaliothamnus, Gnaphalium, Pseudognaphalium, Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae, Gnaphaliinae,
Guatemala, Lucilia- group, comb. nov., sp. nov., Sierra de lo s Cuchumatane s, taxonomy
int roduc tio n
Gnaphaliothamnus Kirp. (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae) comprises around 11 species distributed from Mexico to
Costa Rica. It has been accepted (Nesom 1990a,b; 1994) or subsumed in the South American Chionolaena DC.
(Anderberg & Freire 1989, 1991; Freire 1993; Nesom 2001; Freire et al. 2015). Based upon differences i n cypse-
lar (achenial) trichome s, Dillon (2003) argued that Gnaphaliothamnus was a monophyletic g roup not necessar-
ily close to Chionolaena. The cypselar trichomes in Gnaphaliothamnus are described (Hess 1938) as short cla-
vate (zwillingshaares) with an enlarged adaxi al basal cel l (schwellpolster) and myxogenic apica l cells 65–125 µm
long. The two apical cells in the cypselar trichomes in Chionolaena are much longer (250–850 µm long) and
not myxogenic (Dillon & Sagástegui 1991; Loeuille et al. 2011).
Pruski (2012) transferred a Guatem alan species, Gnaphalium stolonatum S.F.Blake, to Chionolaena, with the
comment th at it resembled other Mex ican and Central American members. He apparently did not examine the
type material of G. stolonatum, providing a new description drawn from a herbarium collection that he termed
a “topotype” (A. Molina et al. 16441, NY). From this voucher, he described the plants as reduced subshrubs to
30 cm tal l with clusters of capitula each havi ng 30–70+ pistillate florets and 11–25 hermaph roditic disc floret s.
He described the cypselas as setose with elongate trichomes, a condition very different from that described for
the type by Blake, i.e., minutely hispidulous with conical, bluntish, few-celled, dark-based hairs (Blake 1937).
An examination of the holotype of Gnaphalium stolonatum (A.F. Skutch 1098, GH) has shown it to be distinct
from other collections from the same general region annotated a s G. stolonatum. Gnaphalium stolonatum is here
treated as a Pseudognaphalium Kirp. and transferred to that genus. The other morphologically different collec-
This article has been licensed for personal, non-commercial use by the author(s) and publishers.
64 Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 9(1)
tions (e.g., A. Molina et al. 16441) are descr ibed here as a new species of Gnaphaliothamnus from t he Sierra de los
Cuchumatanes.
In the ultimate offering from H. Robinson (2015), he relegates Pseudoligandra M.O. Dillon & Sagást. (1990)
and Gnaphaliothamnus to the synonymy of Chionolaena. He states that the publications by Freire (1993) and
Nesom (2001) have “totally resolved that problem by reducing all three genera to synonymy under the name
Chionolaena.” While we have been un successful i n extracting DNA from the sa mples representi ng Pseudoligan-
dra at our disposal, we are confident that our nrDNA results have more definitively resolved the problem of the
recognition of Gnaphaliothamnus as distinct from Chionolaena.
taxonomy
Gnaphaliothamnus nesomii M.O. Dillon & Luebert, sp. nov. (Fig. 1). type. GUATEMAL A. Huehuetena ngo: common on
moist bank along road to San Juan Ixcoy, Sierra Cuchumatanes, 12–23 Jan 1966, A. Molina R., W.C. Burger, and B. Wallenta 16441
(holotype: F1637117; isotype: NY, n.v.)
Similar to Gnaphaliothamnus salicifolius (Bertol.) G.L. Nesom but habit considerably smaller (to 15 cm ta ll), capitulescences glomer ulate,
obscu red in dense a rachnoid-tome ntose indument um, cyps elar trich omes ca. 100 µm long
Subshrubs, 5–10(–15) cm tall; stems ascending, basally-branched from lignified base. Leaves sessile, oblan-
ceolate to spatulate, 10–42 mm long, 2– 4 mm wide, abaxial sur faces white-tomentose, adaxi al surfaces darker,
weakly arachnoid-tomentose, apices acute, apiculate, proximal leaves marcescent. Capitulescences densely
glomerulate with 7–11(–20) tightly grouped capitula, pedicles obscured by dense arachnoid-tomentose indu-
mentum. Capitula 5–7 mm long, 2–3 mm diam.; involucres narrowly campanulate, graduated, submerged in
dense arachnoid-tomentose indumentum; phyllaries 4–6-seriate, the outer with arachnoid-tomentose bases;
the inne r with white-opaque, oblong apical lamina, 5 –7 mm long, ca. 2 mm wide; outer floret s 20–32, pistill ate,
fertile; central disc florets 13–15, hermaphroditic, ovary sterile. Cypselas oblong, ca. 1 mm long, trichomes
4-celled, clavate, ca. 100 µm long, the apical cells myxogenic, not rupturing (Fig. 2A); pappus of ca. 20, setose
bristles, 2.8–3.2 mm long, apical cells of bristles of hermaphroditic florets expanded, apical cells of pistillate
florets obtuse, not expanded.
Etymology.—Gnaphaliothamnus nesomii is dedicated to Dr. Guy L. Nesom, noted synanthrologist and
systematist, one of the first botanists to accept Gnaphaliothamnus in modern usage, and first to provide a de-
tailed revision for Mexican and Central American taxa. Over the years, Dr. Nesom has been generous with his
detailed knowledge of Mexican and Central American Asteraceae and particularly the Gnaphalieae. He also
commented on the uniqueness of some of the sheet s examined within his loan of material from Field Museum
in 1990.
Distribution and Ecology.—The type locality is within the Sierra de los Cuchumatanes in the Department
of Huehuetenango, Guatemala [15°31'S, 91°32'W]. This is the highest non-volcanic mountain range in Central
America and has the most extensive highlands above 3000 m. The region is home to a variety of different bi-
omes, including montane pine-oak forest, intermittent shr ublands, and grasslands. Gnaphaliothamnus nesomii
is found in alpine habitats at ca. 3700 m, notably different from the environments associated with the “llanos”
or plains where Gnaphalium stolonatum occurs (see below).
Conservation status.— Gnaphaliothamnus nesomii deserves a preliminary status of Critically Endangered
(CR) because total area of its known distribution is less than 100 km² and only three populations are known
(I UCN 20 01).
Discussion.— Recent molecular phylogenetic studie s (nrDNA) have provided re sults that sug gest the great
majority of New World genera of Gnaphalieae are associated with the Lucilia-group within the FLAG clade
(Freire et al. 2015; Luebert et al., unpubl.). The Lucilia-group has been expanded to include Gnaphaliothamnus,
Chionolaena, and Antennaria Gaertn. from the subtribe Cassiniinae Anderb. (Anderberg 1991). These results
support the hypothe sis that the gross morphological similar ity between Gnaphaliothamnus and Chionolaena is
convergence; they are found in distant well-supported clades w ithin the Lucilia-group (Fig. 3). Gnaphaliotham-
nus is phylogenetically related to Antennaria, while Chionolaena appears to be sister to a group including the
type species of Lucilia Cass., which is in agreement with their similarity in cypselar trichomes.
Dillon and Luebert, A new species of Gnaphaliothamnus from Guatemala 65
Fig. 1. Gnaphaliothamnus nesomii. Photograph of holotype collection, A. Molina R. et al. 16441 (F1637117, imgV0093984F).
66 Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 9(1)
Fig. 2. Cypselar trichomes, white scale bar = 100 µm. A. Gnaphaliothamnus nesomii (F1637117), B. G. salicifolius (F1639348), C. Pseudognaphalium
stolonatum (GH00008351), D. P. antennarioides (F1148157).
Nesom (1990a) provided a detailed taxonomic history for Gnaphaliothamnus and his rationales for its ac-
ceptance (Nesom 1990b, 1994). Interestingly, Nesom also discussed the putative relationships for Gnaphalium
stolonatum as outside of Gnaphaliothamnus (Nesom 1990a, p. 367). He commented that this taxon did have
white-tipped phyllaries, but it had more florets per capitulum in general (+100) and fertile central disc florets,
Dillon and Luebert, A new species of Gnaphaliothamnus from Guatemala 67
Fig. 3. Simplified cladogram of the Lucilia-group derived from preliminary result of a Bayesian analysis of Gnaphalieae with nrDNA sequence data
(ITS+ETS) carried out in MrBayes v.3.1.2 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003). The numbers above branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities. The results
are congruent with those reported by Freire et al. (2015). Chionolaena and Gnaphaliothamnus do not form a clade.
68 Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 9(1)
Table 1. Comparison of salient morphological characters in the species of Gnaphaliothamnus and Pseudognaphalium discussed here. Cypselar trichomes are
illustrated in Figure 2.
Character G. nesomii G. salicifolia P. stolonatum P. antennarioides
Habit subshrubs to 15 cm subshrubs to 100 cm perennial herbs perennial herbs
Stolons none none present present
Capitula height 5–7 mm 6–7 4.5–5.5 mm 6–7 mm
Pistillate florets 20–32 (22–)34–55 44–92 (50–)75–190
Hermaphroditic florets 13–15 3–4(–7) 7–14 7–16
Cypselar trichomes ca. 100 µm long, Fig. 2A 62–78 µm long, Fig. 2B 38–40 µm long, Fig. 2C ca. 50 µm long, Fig. 2D
and suggested it was probably best maintained in Gnaphalium L. s.s. There has been acceptance of Pseudog-
naphalium and the majority of New World species previously classified as Gnaphalium were transferred there
(Anderberg 1991).
Gnaphaliothamnus nesomii was originally treated as Gnaphalium stolonatum. In a note from Guy Nesom
(16 Feb 1990) accompanying the return of his Field Museum loan, he mentioned the presence of some un-
usual or atypical specimens with fewer pistillate florets. When Pruski (2012) encountered what he considered
conspecific material (A. Molina 16441, NY), he transferred the species to Chionolaena and described its floral
morphology exactly as it is in Gnaphaliothamnus. He related it to other Mexican and Central American species,
including C. eleagnoides Klatt, C. lavandulifolia (Kunth) Benth & Hook. f., C. concinna (A. Gray) Anderb. & S.
E. Freire (as C. mexicana S. E. Freire), and C. salicifolia (Bertol.) G.L. Nesom, all species considered here to be-
long within Gnaphaliothamnus.
Gnaphaliothamnus nesomii is distinctive among members of Gnaphaliothamnus. It has a dwarf woody veg-
etative habit with stems only 5–10(–15) cm long, the basal leaves are marcescent and cloaking the lower por-
tions of the stems, and the glomerulate capitulescences with the heads immersed in dense, white, arachnoid-
tomentose indumentum, is a combination of characteristics unmatched in the genus. It has oblanceolate to
spathulate leaves to 42 mm long, white-opaque phyllary apices, and capitula with 20–32 pistillate florets, and
13–15 hermaphroditic florets, Nesom’s (1990a) key would lead to G. salicifolius; which is the only other mem-
ber of Gnaphaliothamnus to be recorded from Guatemala, and it has a widespread distr ibution extending nor th
from Guatemala to central Mexico.
Gnaphaliothamnus salicifolius has a distribution quite unlike all other species, which tend to be narrowly
endemic and geographically restricted (Nesom 1990a,b, 1994). In Guatemala, it inhabits the edge of pine-oak
forests at about 3000 m and is also found in the Sierra de los Cuchumatanes, recorded on the road between
Paquix and San Juan Ixcoy (A. Molina R. 21293, F1661761; A. Molina R. et al. 30031, F1734420; A. Molina R. et al.
16550, F1639348) and N of Santa Eulalia (F. Almeda and J.L. Luteyn 1686, F17 33 978).
Table 1 allows for comparison of the salient morphological characteristics of three of the Gnaphalieae
taxa known to occur in region around the Sierra de los Cuchumatanes.
Additional material examined: GUATEMALA. Huehuetenango: Sierra Cuchumatanes between Paqui x and San Juan Ixcoy, 8 Jan 1974,
3000 –3350 m, A. Molina R., A.R. Mo lina, and J.A. Mol ina 30055 (F1734422); between Tojquiá a nd Caxín blu ff, summit o f Sierra de los Cuch u-
mata nes, 3700 m, 6 Aug 1942, J.A. Ste yermark 50159 (F114815 0).
key to g naph al ioth am nus spec ies
The following annotated key will allow for identification of Gnaphaliothamnus species (adapted from Nesom
1990a):
1. Inner phyllaries lacking prominent, white lamina; pappus bristles monomorphic (Chiapas - Mexico) _________ G. cryptocephalus
G.L. Nesom
1. Inner phyllaries with prominent, white lamina.
2. Adaxial leaf surfaces with stipitate glandular trichomes beneath the arachnoid-tomentum.
3. Pistillate florets 5–10; pappus bristles strongly dimorphic, caducous; cypselas glabrous (Costa Rica) _________ G. costaricensis
G.L. Nesom
Dillon and Luebert, A new species of Gnaphaliothamnus from Guatemala 69
3. Pistillate florets 12–24; pappus bristles monomorphic to weakly or strongly dimorphic, basally persistent; cypselas
with trichomes.
4. Pistillate florets 12–18, usually equal the number of hermaphroditic; pappus bristles strongly dimorphic (Oaxaca
- Mexico) _______________________________________________________________________ G. macdonaldii G.L. Nesom
4. Pistillate florets 21–24, usually about twice as many as the hermaphroditic; pappus bristles monomorphic to very
weakly dimorphic (Veracruz, Puebla, Tlaxcala, Morelos - Mexico) _________________ G. lavandulifolius (Kunth) G.L. Nesom
2. Adaxial leaf surfaces arachnoid-tomentose to glabrate, eglandular.
5. Leaves 7–8 mm long; phyllaries subequal (Oaxaca - Mexico) _______________________________ G. sartorii (Klatt) G.L. Nesom
5. Leaves shorter than 5 mm or longer than 10 mm long; phyllaries strongly graduated.
6. Heads few in tight clusters at tips of leafy stems.
7. Plants dioecious; leaves 2.5–5 mm long; phyllaries with reddish midregion (Oaxaca - Mexico) _______ G. aecidiocephalus
(Grierson) G.L. Nesom
7. Plants polygamodioecious; leaves 10–20 mm long; phyllaries without a red midregion (San Luis Potosí -
Mexico) _________________________________________________________________ G. concinnus (A. Gray) G.L. Nesom
6. Heads numerous in corymbs above the leaves.
8. Leaves elliptic to elliptic-oblanceolate; pappus bristles weakly dimorphic.
9. Leaves elliptic to elliptic-oblanceolate, 15–42 mm long, 4–8 mm wide (Hidalgo, Oaxaca - Mexico)
_______________________________________________________________________G. eleagnoides (Klatt) G.L. Nesom
9. Leaves elliptic-obovate, 10–20 mm long, 3–5 mm wide (Durango - Mexico) _____________ G. durangensis G.L. Nesom
8. Leaves linear to oblanceolate or spathulate; pappus bristles strongly dimorphic.
10. Leaves 20–80 mm long, 1–3(–5) mm wide; pistillate florets (22–)34–55; hermaphroditic florets 3–4(–7)
(Guatemala, Mexico) ___________________________________________________ G. salicifolius (Bertol.) G.L. Nesom
10. Leaves 10–42 mm long, 2–4 mm wide; pistillate florets 20–32; hermaphroditic florets 13–15 (Guatemala)
__________________________________________________________G. nesomii M.O. Dillon & Luebert
new com binations in p seud ogna ph ali um
Pseudognaphalium stolonatum (S.F. Blake) M.O. Dillon, comb. nov. (Fig. 4). Gnaphalium stolonatum S.F. Blake, Brit-
tonia 2:341. 1937. type: GUATEMALA. HueHuetenango: llanos of the Sier ra Cuchumatanes, 10,500 ft [3200 m], 24 Aug 1934, A. F.
Skutch 1098 (Holotype: GH00008351; isotype: TEX-L L003737 32, n.v.).
Chionolaena stolonata (S.F. Blake) Pr uski, Phytoneu ron 2012-1:4. 2012.
Perennial herbs 10–25 mm tall, roots fibrous; stolons from the base, filiform; stems erect, usually simple,
rarely branched, thinly arachnoid-tomentose, purplish. Leaves oblanceolate to linear, 2–4.5 mm long, 0.5–1
mm wide, abaxial surfaces gray with dense tomentose indumentum, adaxial surfaces obscurely stipitate-
glandular under thinly arachnoid-tomentose indumentum, apices apiculate, bases slightly decurrent. Capit-
ulescences glomerulate, crowded at apic es. Capitula campanulate, ses sile, 4.5–5.5 mm tall, 4.5–5.5 mm d iam.;
phyllaries ca. 4-seriate, graduated, thinly arachnoid-tomentose; outer ovate to oblong-lanceolate, obtuse to
acute, inner narrowly lanceolate, narrowed to an obtuse apex; pistillate florets 85–92, the corollas filiform,
white, ca. 2.5 mm long, pappus bristles ca. 3 mm long, apices acute; hermaphroditic florets (7–)11(–14), the
corollas cylindrical, white with rose-color lobes, the styles apically subtruncate, ovary sterile; pappus bristles
ca. 3 mm long, apically obtuse, slightly expanded. Cypselas ca. 1 mm long, minutely hispidulous, the tri-
chomes clavate, 38–40 µm long (Fig. 2C).
Pseudognaphalium stolonatum has been collected within the Sierra de los Cuchumatanes from alpine
meadows on rock outcrops, 3200–3750 m. It was included in Gnaphalium s.s. by Anderberg (1991). Inspection
of the type has shown it to have floral morphology consistent with Pseudognaphalium (Anderberg 1991).
Blake (1937) specifically related Pseudognaphalium stolonatum to P. antennarioides (DC.) Anderb., a rosu-
late, stoloniferous herb distributed from Colombia to Bolivia with capitula having (50–)75–190 pistillate and
7–16 hermaphroditic florets. Phylogenetic studies have shown that Pseudognaphalium is a member of the HAP
clade (Smissen et al. 2011; Nie et al. 2013; Galbany-Casals et al. 2014), along with Achyrocline (Less.) DC., He-
lichrysum Mill., and Anaphalis DC .; Gnaphaliothamnus and Chionolaena are members of the FL AG clade, which
is only distantly related (Smissen et al. 2011).
Pseudognaphalium subsericeum (S.F. Blake) Anderb. (= Gnaphalium subsericeum S.F. Blake, 1927), a Costa
Rican endemic, was also mentioned as potentially related to Gnaphaliothamnus salicifolius by Blake (p. 62). An
examination of conspecific material from Costa Rica (F1692005, F1692006) shows P. subsericeum more simi-
70 Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 9(1)
Fig. 4. Pseudognaphalium stolonatum. Photograph of holotype collection of Gnaphalium stolonatum S.F.Blake, A.F. Skutch 1098 (GH000008351).
Dillon and Luebert, A new species of Gnaphaliothamnus from Guatemala 71
Fig. 5. Pseudognaphalium paramorum. Photograph of holotype collection of Gnaphalium paramorum S.F.Blake, A. Jahn 883 (US1186590, img00129548).
72 Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 9(1)
lar to P. stolonatum or P. antennarioides (DC.) Anderb., the latter an Andean species that has similar overall
morphology and cypselar trichomes (Fig. 2D). All these species have capitula in dense cymes or glomerules
and phyllaries with showy, white apices.
Additional specimens examined: GUATEMALA. Huehuetenango: vicinit y of Chemal, sum mit of Sierra de los Cuchumat anes, 3700–3750
m, 8 Aug 1942, J. A. Ste yermark 50253 (F1148157), 50273 (F114818 0), 50275 (F114817 9).
Pseudognaphalium paramorum (S.F. Blake) M.O. Dillon, comb. nov. (Fig. 5). basionym: Gnaphalium paramorum S.F.
Blake, J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 21:328. 1931. type: VENEZUELA. Estado Mérida: Páramo Quirorá, 2900 m, 24 Feb 1922, A. Jahn 883
(Holotype: US118 6590).
Gamochaeta paramora (S.F. Blake) Anderb., Ope ra Bot. 104:157. 1991.
Blake (1931) commented that Pseudognaphalium paramorum had the appearance of Gnaphalium antennarioides
DC. (= P. antennarioides (DC.) Anderb.), and he related it to that taxon, which is a rosulate, stoloniferous herb
distributed from Colombia to Bolivia.
Anderberg (1991) transferred Gnaphalium paramorum to Gamochaeta Wedd.; an examination of the type
collection shows it to only superficially resemble Gamochaeta. It has a basal rosette of subspathulate leaves and
unbranched, ascending stems. The terminal capitulescences are not spicate; they are densely glomerulate cor-
ymbs. The t ype collection has capitular and flora l morphology consistent with Pseudognaphalium; the cy pselas
are papillose and lack the 2-celled, sessile trichomes diagnostic for Gamochaeta.
acknowled gments
We thank the curators and staff of the herbaria at F, GH, MO, NY, TEX, and US for permitting access to their
material. Especially, we wish to acknowledge Ms. Emily Wood, Collections Manager at the Gray Herbarium,
who expedited loan of type material from that institution. We thank John Strother for many constructive sug-
gestions in the review process. Andrés Moreira-Muñoz and Miguel Álvarez provided plant material for phylo-
genetic studies. Digital images were obtained via the Internet in Figure 4 from GH and Figure 5 from US. We
than k Field Museum’s Christine Niezgoda, Anna Balla, Daniel Le, and Allie Stone for hand ling various aspects
of loans and digitizing collections.
refer enc es
Anderberg, A. 1991. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the tribe Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae). Opera Bot. 104:1–195.
Anderberg, A. & S.E. Freire. 1989. Transfer of two species from Anaphalis DC. to Chionolaena DC. (Asteraceae, Gnapha-
lieae). Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 46(1):37–41.
blAke, S.F. 1927. New Asteraceae from Costa Rica. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 17(3):59-65.
blAke, S.F. 1931. Nine new American Asteraceae. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 21(14):325–336.
blAke, S.F. 1937. New Asteraceae from Guatemala and Costa Rica Collected by A.F. Skutch. Brittonia 2(4):329–361.
dillon, M.O. 2003. New combinations in Luciliocline with notes on South American Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae). Arnaldoa
10(1):45–60.
dillon, M.O. & A. SAgáStegui-A. 1991. Sinopsis de los géneros de Gnaphaliinae (Asteraceae-Inuleae) de Sudamerica. Ar-
naldoa 1(2):5–91.
dillon, M.o. & A. SAgáStegui A. 1990. Oligandra Less. Revisited and the need for a new genus, Pseudoligandra (Asteraceae:
Inuleae). Taxon 39:125–128.
Freire, S.E. 1993. A revision of Chionolaena (Compositae, Gnaphalieae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80(2):397–438.
Freire, S.E., M.A. CheMiSquy, A.A. Anderberg, S.G. beCk, R.I. MeneSeS, B. loeuille, & E. urtubey. 2015. The Lucilia group (Asteraceae,
Gnaphalieae): phylogenetic and taxonomic considerations based on molecular and morphological evidence. Pl.
Syst. Evol. 301:1227–1248. doi: 10.1007/s00606-014-1147-0.
gAlbAny-CASAlS, M., M. unwin, n. gArCiA-JACAS, r.d. SMiSSen, A. SuSAnnA, & r.J. bAyer. 2014. Phylogenetic relationships in He-
lichrysum (Compositae: Gnaphalieae) and related genera: Incongruence between nuclear and plastid phylogenies,
biogeographic and morphological patterns, and implications for generic delimitation. Taxon 63(3):608–624.
IUCN SpeCieS Sur vivAl CoMMiSSion. 2001. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and
Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1–30.
Dillon and Luebert, A new species of Gnaphaliothamnus from Guatemala 73
heSS, R. 1938. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Zwillingshaare der Compositen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 68:435-496.
loeuille, b., l. beble, & J.n. nAkAJiMA. 2011. Four new species of Chionolaena (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae) from southeastern
Brazil. Kew Bull. 66(2):263–272.
neSoM, G.L. 1990a. Taxonomy of Gnaphaliothamnus (Asteraceae: Inuleae). Phytologia 68(5):366–381.
neSoM, G.L. 1990b. An additional species of Gnaphaliothamnus (Asteraceae: Inuleae) and further evidence for the integ-
rity of the genus. Phytologia 68(6):1–3.
neSoM, G.L. 1994. Comments on Gnaphaliothamnus (Asteraceae: Inuleae). Phytologia 76:185–191.
neSoM, G.L. 2001. New combinations in Chionolaena (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae). Sida 19(4):849–852.
nie, Z.-l., v. Funk, h. Sun, t. deng, y. Meng, & J. wen. 2013. Molecular phylogeny of Anaphalis (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae) with
biogeographic implications in the Northern Hemisphere. J. Plant Res. 126(1):17–32.
pruSki, J.F. 2012. Studies of Neotropical Compositae–IV. Pseudognaphalium leucostegium, a new species from Huehu-
etenango, Guatemala, and a new combination in Chionolaena (Gnaphalieae). Phytoneuron 2012-1:1–5.
robinSon, H. 2015. Notes on the genus Chionolaena in Colombia with a new species Chionolaena barclayae (Asteraceae,
Gnaphalieae). PhytoKeys 46:67–71, doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.46.8976
ronquiSt, F. & J.P. huelSenbeCk. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics
19:1572–1574.
SMiSSen, r.d., M. gAlbAny-CASAlS, & i. breitwieSer. 2011. Ancient allopolyploidy in the everlasting daisies (Asteraceae:
Gnaphalieae): Complex relationships among extant clades. Taxon 60(3):649–662.
... Chionolaena was treated by Freire (1993) as accepted by Anderberg (1991), where several species of Gnaphaliothamnus were synonymized under Chionolaena along with the monospecific genera Parachionolaena and Pseudoligandra (Dillon & Sagástegui Alva, 1990, 1991b. Dillon & Sagástegui Alva (1991b), Nesom (1990aNesom ( , b, 1994 and Dillon & Luebert (2015) treated Gnaphaliothamnus as a distinct genus composed of Mexican and Central American taxa. Nesom (2001) transferred the remaining Mexican and Central American species of Gnaphaliothamnus to Chionolaena, while maintain ing the opinion that the northern hemispheric elements were monophyletic. ...
... Moreover, there are a number of morphological characters separating them, as dis cussed above. These two genera should be considered separate taxonomic entities as suggested by Nesom (1990aNesom ( , 1994 and Dillon & Luebert (2015). The status of Parachionolaena and Pseudoligandra, also considered synonyms of Chionolaena (Freire, 1993), still needs to be assessed in the light of molecu lar data. ...
Article
Full-text available
The Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae) are a cosmopolitan tribe with around 185 genera and 2000 species. The New World is one of the centers of diversity of the tribe with 24 genera and over 100 species, most of which form a clade called the Lucilia-group with 21 genera. However, the generic classification of the Lucilia-group has been controversial with no agreement on delimitation or circumscription of genera. Especially controversial has been the taxonomic value of achenial trichomes and molecular studies have shown equivocal results so far. The major aims of this paper are to provide a nearly complete phylogeny of the Lucilia-group at generic level and to discuss the evolutionary trends and taxonomic significance of achenial trichome morphology. We conducted a phylogenetic analysis of the New World Gnaphalieae with nrDNA (ETS, ITS) sequence data from a sampling of 18 genera of the Lucilia-group and utilized these results to examine morphological evolution of achenial trichome types and presence of apical myxogenic cells. Seven well-supported subclades can be recognized within the Lucilia-group (L1–L7). These results support Brazilian and Andean Berroa, Facelis, Lucilia, and Micropsis forming a clade (L1), the inclusion of Chilean Lucilia under Belloa (L2), the monophyly of Stuckertiella +Gamochaeta +Gamochaetopsis (L3), Chevreulia +Cuatrecasasiella (L4) and Antennaria (L5) excluding Antennaria linearifolia, which is resolved in a monophyletic group together with Jalcophila, Loricaria and Mniodes (L6), and the recognition of Gnaphaliothamnus (L7) removed from Brazilian taxa of Chionolaena (L2). Ancestral character state reconstruction of achenial trichome morphology suggests that clades are homogeneous in terms of trichome type, but with exceptions that make it highly homoplastic. Conversely, our results suggest that the presence of myxogenic apical cells is less homoplastic and that closely related species tend to resemble each other more than expected under random variation.
... Años más tarde, Hilliard y Burtt (1981) y Anderberg (1991) transfirieron diez, y aproximadamente 70 especies más de Gnaphalium a Pseudognaphalium, respectivamente. Recientemente se han realizado más cambios en otros Pseudognaphalium (Kartesz, 1999;Hinojosa-Espinosa y Villaseñor, 2014;Dillon y Luebert, 2015), y también se describió una nueva especie (Pruski, 2012). Una comparación completa entre Pseudognaphalium y Gnaphalium, así como la relación con otros géneros, se presenta en la publicación de Hinojosa-Espinosa y Villaseñor (2014). ...
Article
Full-text available
Antecedentes y Objetivos: Pseudognaphalium es un género de la tribu Gnaphalieae (Asteraceae) segregado de Gnaphalium. Desde su separación en 1950, ha habido una serie de transferencias que cubren todos los taxones mexicanos. McVaugh describe Gnaphalium vulcanicum var. monticola y, posteriormente, Espinosa-García G. oxyphyllum var. nataliae. Ambos nombres han tenido cambios nomenclaturales y, junto con las variedades típicas, se han mantenido como categorías infraespecíficas. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar si existe soporte para reconocer como especies a cuatro variedades de Pseudognaphalium: P. liebmannii var. liebmannii, P. liebmannii var. monticola, P. oxyphyllum var. oxyphyllum y P. oxyphyllum var. nataliae. Métodos: Se realizó un análisis morfométrico de 77 muestras y la evaluación de 20 caracteres para encontrar la similitud entre cuatro categorías infraespecíficas: Pseudognaphalium liebmannii var. liebmannii, P. liebmannii var. monticola, P. oxyphyllum var. oxyphyllum y P. oxyphyllum var. nataliae. Resultados clave: El uso de análisis multivariados mostró que se pueden diferenciar objetivamente las cuatro variedades estudiadas. Éstas forman grupos aislados sin sobreposición entre sus elementos. Pseudognaphalium oxyphyllum var. nataliae está más cercano a P. oxyphyllum var. oxyphyllum y a su vez P. liebmannii var. monticola muestra mayor proximidad con P. oxyphyllum var. nataliae que con P. liebmanii var. liebmanii. Conclusiones: Como consecuencia de la separación de las categorías infraespecíficas estudiadas mediante el análisis de similitud se proponen como nuevas jerarquías taxonómicas a nivel de especie a Pseudognaphalium monticola y P. nataliae.
... Not only does the Mexican material not correspond to the morphology of M. santanica, the two populations would exhibit an amphitropical disjunction of over 6000 kms. The published results ofNie et al. (2013) andLuebert et al. (2017) both recover this taxon in a clade with Gnaphaliothamnus Kirp., far removed from Mniodes(Dillon & Luebert 2015).3. Mniodes turneri (Sagást. ...
Article
Full-text available
Changes in the generic boundaries, as suggested by DNA sequence data, have altered concepts of Andean Asteraceae, specifically Belloa J. Rémy, Lucilia Cass., and Mniodes (A.Gray) Benth. (Gnaphalieae, Asteraceae). Over the past 30 years, numerous changes in classification and the resulting transfers have generated confusion. This paper provides a short history of these changes and current information for these genera as they exist in Andean South America. Further, other transfers are provided as suggested by results of sequence analysis data and newly proposed generic concepts: Belloa eriophora (J. Rémy) M. O. Dillon, comb. nov., and Belloa nivea (Phil.) M. O. Dillon, comb. nov. Changes in the diagnosis of Mniodes necessitates the following transfers: Mniodes argentea (Wedd.) M. O. Dillon, comb. nov., M. spathulifolia (Sagást. & M. O. Dillon) M. O. Dillon, comb. nov. and M. turneri (Sagást. & M. O. Dillon) M. O. Dillon, comb. nov.
Article
Full-text available
A new species and a new record for Chionolaena are recorded from Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia adding to the two species of the genus already known from that mountain complex.
Article
Full-text available
Oligandra Less. was stated by Freire (1989) to be unispecific and a synonym of Lucilia Cass. Freire formally transferred the type species, O. lycopodioides Less., to Lucilia. However, she did not account for two additional species: Oligandra pachymorpha Wedd. and O. chrysocoma Wedd. Neither belongs in Lucilia as currently interpreted (Freire, 1986).
Article
Five nomenclatural combinations complete the transfer of-Mexican and Central American species from Gnaphaliothamnus to Chionolaena: Chionolaena costaricensis, Chionolaena cryptocephala, Chionolaena durangensis, Chionolaena macdonaldii, and Chionolaena salicifolia. In this view, Chionolaena is a genus spread across northeastern and northern South America, Central America, and south-central to southwestern Mexico.
Article
The neotropical genus Chionolaena is accepted as including the species of Leucopholis, which has been considered a separate genus by several authors because of its few-flowered capitula. Chionolaena consists of small, more or less woody shrubs with a discontinuous distribution: central Mexico, northern Colombia, and southern Brazil, with disjunct populations in Central America (Costa Rica) and northern Amazonia (southern Venezuela). The most closely related genus is Gnaphaliothamnus from Mexico and Guatemala. Seventeen species of Chionolaena are recognized, one of which, C. mexicana, is described for the first time. Three new combinations are made: Chionolaena capitata, C. chrysocoma, and C. seemannii. Descriptions, typification, synonymy, distribution maps, illustrations, indices, and a key to all taxa are presented. A cladistic analysis of Chionolaena was performed using morphological characters. Polarity of characters was based on outgroup comparison with the genus Gnaphaliothamnus. Two monophyletic groups were resolved: (1) the "concinna species group" (including C. concinna and C. seemannii); and (2) the "mexicana species group" (including C. aecidiocephala, C. arbuscula, C. capitata, C. columbiana, C. chrysocoma, C. eleagnoides, C. isabellae, C. jeffreyi, C. latifolia, C. lavandulifolia, C. lychnophorioides, C. mexicana, C. phylicoides, C. sartorii, and C. wittigiana). Within each group, this resolution places the Mexican species as the sister group of the South American taxa, i.e., a closer historical relationship is indicated between the Colombian and Brazilian areas than between either and the Mexican area.