Six expert and four novice coaches evaluated the technique quality of 109 young female volleyball players,
whose average age was 15.4±2.6 years, using the video recordings of their playing. The aim of the
evaluation was to determine the differences in volleyball technique evaluation (serve, serve reception, attack
and block). The conclusion, based on the descriptive indicators, was that both
... [Show full abstract] groups of coaches, on
average, used similar evaluation marks, and those expert coaches used a wider range of marks more often
than the novice coaches. In all of the volleyball technique evaluation tests, the expert reviewers had higher
mutual correlations than the novice coaches. Novice coaches had somewhat lower homogeneity and
congruence in the mutual object of measuring: reviewing the serve technique, serve and attack, and
especially the block technique, what could be anticipated, due to the complexity of the technique element.
Variance analysis determined the non-homogeneity of the expert, and especially the novice coaches, in
volleyball technique elements evaluation. The obtained results indicate that volleyball technique evaluation
skills should be more present in the process of volleyball experts’ education. The development of these skills
is the first step in the process of perfecting the techniques of volleyball elements.