Thesis

Person-Entrepreneurial Leadership Fitness Instrument (PELFI): Development and Validation of a Theoretical Process-Based Measure.

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

The purpose of this exploratory study was to develop and validate the Person- Entrepreneurial Leadership Fitness Instrument (PELFI). This study took an important step toward the measurement, refinement, and standardization of entrepreneurial leadership theory utilizing a cross-culturally validated construct of entrepreneurial leadership (Gupta, MacMillan, & Surie, 2004) derived from the Global Leadership Organizational Behavior Effectiveness research program (House, Hanges, Javidan, Dorfman, & Gupta, 2004) and the entrepreneurial new venture process (Mueller & Goic, 2003). Well-established scientific scale development approaches based on the doctrine of DeVellis (2012) have used methods comprised of two stages: item development and scale identification and validation. A Delphi method study utilized a panel of 46 subject matter experts to evaluate the item pool that provided mixed-method feedback. A sample of 273 business owners and entrepreneurs participated in this study. Factor extraction by way of principle component analysis using oblique rotation through direct oblimin was conducted to explore the underlying structure for sources of variability with the first analysis resulting in the extraction of four components with eigenvalues greater than 1.0 explaining 61.29% of the variance--the first accounted for 44.80% of the variance, the second accounted for 7.45% of the variance, the third accounted for 4.61% of the variance, and the fourth accounted for 4.43% of the variance. Reliability analysis resulted in a 21-item, three-factor solution comprised of leader- follower orientation (α = .928), performance orientation (α = .839), and entrepreneurial savvy (α = .827). The third factor of venture scope (α = .727) contained two items for this scale, thus making it unusable. Convergent validity was determined through comparison to the Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation (Bolton & Lane, 2012) and Satisfaction with Business (Powell & Eddleston, 2008) measures. Entrepreneurial leaders are placed in an environmental situation where certain personal individual difference factors are instrumental to the entrepreneurial leadership state of mind in which the greater the person's fitness for entrepreneurial leadership, the higher the likelihood of entrepreneurial leadership success.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... Darling and Beebe (2007) described successful entrepreneurship as a process of leading through direct involvement and example; it generates value for organizational stakeholders by collecting altogether a product or service innovation and package of resources to respond to an identified opportunity. Bennett (2014) declared the entrepreneur is viewed as a strategic entity significantly influencing the fruitful launch, sustainment, and expansion of new ventures and generating a great number of benefits for the community. G. T. Lumpkin and Dess (1996) suggested entrepreneurs "don't 'see' the risks that others see, or, alternatively, they see non-entrepreneurial behavior as far [riskier]" (p. ...
... Dorsa (2007) indicated entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs are frequently self-directed individuals with one of their inclinations to act being intently related to locus of control, self-efficacy, learned optimism, drive, and the need to achieve. Bennett (2014) shared, "The entrepreneur leader possesses an internal locus of control and selfefficacy with an orientation that is innovative, proactive, and able to sense opportunity" (p. 6). ...
Article
The purpose of this quantitative exploratory research was to conduct discriminant and cluster analyses to see if the Romans 12 motivational gifts and locus of control predict membership in the entrepreneurial member group and consequently discover motivational gift profiles of entrepreneurs. Four hundred business leaders participated. Both hypotheses were supported, revealing all seven motivational gifts predicted those who were entrepreneurial and those who were not. Five distinct entrepreneurial motivational gift mixes/profiles were established.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.