... One key purpose of a review is to identify gaps in the literature [61] and IPED users seemed to reject the 'medical model' that doctors are the experts as they give credibility to advice from people who have used [33] stating that doctors lacked credibility as they did not [1,2,4,8,12,13,15,16] Online forums* [3,8,17] Underground books/Magazines [1,8,13,16,18] Doctor(s)/Medical practitioner(s)/Nurse(s) [1,4,12,15] Gym contact(s)/Gym trainer(s)/Personal trainers [1,4,12,15,19] Dealer(s)/Supplier(s) [1-3, 11, 12, 15] Questions to anti-doping hotline/Online service on AAS [20] Internet/Specialist websites* [2-4, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18] Medical journals [1] NSP(s) [2,4,12,15] Steroid guides in gyms/Other sources [12,15,18] Research into cycling, stacking and types of substances Peers/Fellow users [2,13] Websites [16] Dealers [2] Online forums [17] Self-experimentation [16] Research into side effects and risk management People with 'hands-on' experience of use/ Steroid guides in gyms/ Underground books/Dedicated websites [18] Questions to anti-doping hotline/Online service on adverse side-effects/ Health risks [20] Doping tests Questions to anti-doping hotline/Online service on obtaining positive doping test and penalties [20] Any data given about access of services that is not linked to AAS/IPED use has not been included in this table. *It could be that when AAS users refer to websites they might also mean specialist forums have personal experience [36]. ...