Content uploaded by Faruk SELCUK
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Faruk SELCUK on Apr 29, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Submitted 30 April 2014, Accepted 9 May 2014, Published online 23 May 2014
Corresponding Author: Faruk Selçuk – e-mail – selcuk_faruk@yahoo.com 419
A new species of Manoharachariella (hyphomycetes) from Central
Anatolia, Turkey
Faruk SELÇUK and Kadriye EKİCİ
Ahi Evran University, Arts and Sciences Faculty, Department of Biology, 40169 Kırşehir, Turkey
Faruk SELÇUK, Kadriye EKİCİ 2014 – A new species of Manoharachariella (hyphomycetes)
from Central Anatolia, Turkey. Mycosphere 5(3), 419–423, Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/5/3/4
Abstract
Manoharachariella elsadii is described as a new species from Turkey. It differs from the
two known species by possessing smaller conidia with fewer septa. In addition, it has shorter
conidiophores than M. indica and longer conidiophores than M. lignicola.
Key words – anamorphic fungi – Anatolian Peninsula – dematiaceous hyphomycete
Introduction
Turkey has a very diverse flora, and the higher plants have been well studied. However, the
mycobiota has not been extensively investigated and most studies deal with macromycetes
especially agaricoid fungi. During the past two decades research on micromycetes (including
hyphomycetes) in the country has intensified (Hüseyinov & Selçuk 1999, Braun et al. 2000,
Hüseyin & Selçuk 2001, Hüseyin et al. 2003, 2005, Mel’nik et al. 2004, Selçuk et al. 2009, 2010,
2014). A new hyphomycete species was found during a trip to Kervansaray Mountain, Kırşehir
Province, Central Anatolian Peninsula. This mountain lies in the Irano-Turanian phytogeographic
region (Hamzaoğlu 1996). The fungus belongs to the genus Manoharachariella, which was
described by Bagyanarayana et al. (2009). They described the type species, M. lignicola, on an
unidentified dead twig from Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. A second species was
described as M. indica by Rajeshkumar & Singh (2012).
Materials & Methods
Samples were collected during a mycological excursion to the Kervansaray Mountain in
Boztepe District, Kırşehir Province of Turkey in 2012. Dead twigs were observed and
photographed using an Olympus SZX 16 binocular stereomicroscope with an Olympus DP26 Digi-
CAM camera. The collections were examined in distilled water and for microphotographs a Leica
DM 3000 (Axio imager 2 equipped with Nomarski differential interference contrast optics)
microscope was used. Identification was carried out through comparison with current taxonomic
works of hyphomycetous fungi under consideration. The examined specimen is deposited at the
Ahi Evran University, Arts and Sciences Faculty, Department of Biology, in Kırşehir Province of
Turkey.
Mycosphere 5 (3): 419–423 (2014) ISSN 2077 7019
www.mycosphere.org Article Mycosphere
Copyright © 2014 Online Edition
Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/5/3/4
420
Results
The following description is based on fungal material found in Central Anatolia (Turkey) on
dead branches of Pyrus elaeagnifolia in 2012.
Manoharachariella elsadii F. Selçuk & E. Hüseyin, sp.nov. Figs 1–58
MycoBank MB 808450
Etymology – Dedicated to Elşad Hüseyin for his great contribution to the knowledge of
Turkish micromycetes.
Species in genere Manoharachariella duae: Manoharachariella lignicola et M. indica, a
quae a conidiis late ellipsoideis, ovoideis, dolioliformes, 20–17.5 × (9.5–)10–12.5(–15) µm ab bene
differt.
Colonies effuse, greenish black, blackish brown or brown, dense, velutinous, 1–10 × 0.5–4
mm. Conidiophores macronematous, mononematous, straight or flexuous, sparsely branched, 5–20-
septate, smooth, pale to dark brown, 50–128 × 3–5.5 µm. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic,
integrated, indeterminate, terminal and lateral (or intercalary), cylindrical, pale brown, brown,
(hyaline to subhyaline), pale brown towards the apex. Conidia solitary, dry, acropleurogenous,
simple, dictyoseptate, tiered, 6–7 transverse septa, 1–2 longitudinal septa, septa dark brown,
ellipsoidal, ovate, doliiform, 20–17.5 × (9.5–)10–12.5(–15) µm, with a hyaline, conical nipple at
the apex, 4.3–6.8 × 2.7–3.5 µm.
Material examined – Turkey, Kırşehir Province, Boztepe district, mountain sparse forest, on
wood of dead twigs of Pyrus elaeagnifolia Pallas (Rosaceae), 39o 13’ 285’’ N, 34o 13’ 648’’ E, 4
November 2012, E. Hüseyin, F. Selçuk (KE 102, holotype).
Figs 1–11 – Manoharachariella elsadii: 1, habit 2–4 colonies 5, branched conidiophore 6–7
conidiogenous cells 8–10 immature conidia and conidiophores 11, young conidium.
421
Figs 12–26 – Manoharachariella elsadii: 12, conidiogenous cell with young conidium 13,
immature and young conidia 14–15 branched conidiophores with conidia 16, conidia and
conidiophores 17, conidial mass 18–26 variation in conidial size and shape.
Discussion
The genus Manoharachariella Bagyan., N.K. Raj & Kunwar and its type species M.
lignicola Bagyan., N.K. Raj & Kunwar was described from Andhra Pradesh, India (Bagyanarayana
et al. 2009). Rajeshkumar & Singh (2012) described a second species, M. indica Rajeshkumar &
S.K. Singh from eastern Ghats, India. Conidia of M. lignicola are doliiform, obpyriform,
ellipsoidal, apiculate, dictyoseptate, smooth, tiered, 42.5–50.5 × 25–32 µm with several
longitudinal septa (Bagyanarayana et al. 2009). Conidia of M. indica are doliiform, obpyriform,
ellipsoidal or irregular, apiculate, dictyoseptate, 84–110(–120) × 31–44 µm with 10–13
longitudinal septa (Rajeshkumar & Singh 2012).
Manoharachariella elsadii differs from M. lignicola and M. indica by smaller conidia, number of
conidial septa, and size of conidiophores.
422
Figs 27–58 – Manoharachariella elsadii: 27–58 variation in conidial size and shape.
Acknowledgement
The authors gratefully thank Prof.Dr. Elşad Hüseyin (Kırsehir, Turkey) and Prof.Dr. Vadim
A. Mel’nik (St Petersburg, Russia) for critical reading and commenting on the manuscript.
References
Bagyanarayana G, Rao NK, Kunwar IK. 2009 – Manoharachariella, a new dematiaceous
hyphomycetous genus from India. Mycotaxon 109, 301–305.
Braun U, Melnik V, Hüseyinov E, Selçuk F. 2000 – Mycopappus alni on species of Betula and
Pyrus from Turkey. Mikologia i Fitopatologia 34, 1–2.
Hamzaoğlu E. 1996 – Flora of Kervansaray mountain (Kırşehir). The Herb Journal of Systematic
Botany 3, 1–24 (in Turkish).
Hüseyin E, Selçuk F. 2001 – New and poorly known genera of microfungi for Turkey. Turkish
Journal of Botany 25, 437–438.
423
Hüseyin E, Selçuk F, Gaffaroğlu M. 2003 – Some materials on mitosporic fungi from Turkey. I.
Hyphomycetes. [Kai kurie duomenys apie Turkijos mitosporinius grybus. I. Hyphomycetes].
Botanica Lithuanica 9, 151–160.
Hüseyin E, Selçuk F, Şahin A. 2005 – The world’s second record of Neoheteroceras flageolotii
reported from Turkey. Mycotaxon 94, 241–244.
Hüseyinov E, Selçuk F. 1999 – New records of phytopathogenic microfungi for Turkey. Plant
Disease Research 14, 175–176.
Mel’nik V, Hüseyin E, Selçuk F. 2004 – Contribution to the studying of micromycetes in several
Black Sea provinces of Turkey. Novitates Systematicae Plantarum non Vascularum. Nauka.
Petropolis 37, 133–148.
Rajeshkumar KC, Singh SK. 2012 – Manoharachariella indica sp. nov. from the Western Ghats,
India. Mycotaxon 120, 43–48.
Selçuk F, Erdoğdu M, Akgül H, Hüseyin E. 2009 – The genus Septoria Sacc. in Turkey. Mycopath
7, 21–28.
Selçuk F, Erdoğdu M, Hüseyin E, Göçmen E. 2010 – Türkiye’den Rapor Edilmiş Piknidial,
Aservular ve Stromatal Yapılarla Eşeysiz Üreyen Mikrofunguslar (The microfungi which
growth pycnidial, acervular and stromata structures, reported from Turkey). Ekoloji 2010
Sempozyumu. Aksaray Üniversitesi Fen – Edebiyat Fakültesi Biyoloji Bölümü ve Türkiye
Tabiatını Koruma Derneği, Aksaray (in Turkish).
Selçuk F, Hüseyin E, Şahin A and Cebeci CC. 2014 – Hyphomycetous fungi in several forest
ecosystems of Black sea provinces of Turkey. Mycosphere 5, 334–344.