Available via license: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 146 ( 2014 ) 329 – 333
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
1877-0428 © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of Russian Psychological Society.
doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.142
Third Annual International Conference «Early Childhood Care and Education»
Diagnostic Methods of Socio – Emotional Competence in
Children
Kristina Parhomenko*
Moscow State University, Mokhovaya st. 11/9, Moscow 125009, Russia
Abstract
The article provides an overview of some of the recent developments in assessing socio – emotional competence (SEC) of
children. The main terms are defined, similarities and differences of the concepts are discussed. The techniques using
observation, questioning, test, checklists, projective method, modeling of social situations, including emotions, are reviewed.
The approach that consists in measuring each of the components of SEC and creating the profile is considered. Along with
diagnostic tools designed directly for the child, the methodologies that take into account parent’s and\or teacher’s assessments
are presented. The author points out the need of developing a complex approach to evaluation of children SEC considering the
age characteristics, child’s development situation, participation of adults who constantly interact with the child, implementing
the principle of unity of diagnosis and correction for further work.
© 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Russian Psychological Society.
Keywords: social emotional competence; components; assessment; methods; complex approach.
* Kristina Parkhomenko Tel.: +7-916-323-56-50; +7-495-632-65-00.
E-mail address: christinap@bk.ru
© 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of Russian Psychological Society.
330 Kristina Parhomenko / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 146 ( 2014 ) 329 – 333
Studying child emotional sphere is a problem equally actual for psychologists, as for teachers and caregivers, due
to increasing social requirements for social emotional competence (SEC) that determines the degree to which a
child is capable of conscious behavior regulation, building harmonious relationships and being engaged in social
activities.
In concerning the theme reviews, terms like communicative competence, emotional competence, competence in
interaction, emotional intelligence, emotional literacy, are often used, besides social and emotional competence.
We will define them below.
Child social competence is the ability to establish and maintain social contacts in the process of interaction on the
base of positive self-attitude [1]. Communicative competence, or competence in interaction, is a system of
psychological knowledge about self and others, communication skills, behavioral strategies for social situations,
which allows building effective communication in accordance with the objectives and goals of interpersonal
interaction [1],[2], [3].
Emotional Intelligence is the ability to experience emotions, to understand own and other people's emotions and
regulate their expression [4]. Emotional literacy is a combination of knowledge and skills necessary for an
adequate perception of communicative situation, evaluation and expression of emotions [5]. Concept of social
emotional competence (SEC) seems to us to be the most integrative as the set of further abilities:
1. Self-awareness which describes knowing one’s strengths and weaknesses, distinguishing and identifying
emotions;
2. Empathy – an ability to recognize, understand and compassion feelings of another, the will to affect them
positively;
3. Motivation that indicates the capability to stay involved and engaged in an activity even if it is hard or previous
experience was partly associated with failure;
4. Self-regulation which represents conscious control above impulsive and inadequate reactions and inappropriate
emotion expressions;
5. Social skills which embraces a wide range of knowledge, abilities and competences including capacity to build
and maintain healthy relationships, be involved in social activities, interact with people in proper ways [6].
Most researchers define and measure the development level of SEC by its components. The main components of
SEC, according to many authors, include the ability to "read" the emotional state of another, to identify and
understand their emotions and feelings, and to manage their own emotions. Diagnostic tools often aim to assess
the developmental level of each of the SEC components and much rarer - to design the profile of children’s social
and emotional sphere. Methods that include checklists are mainly based on children’s self - reports, teacher’s or
parent’s assessments or on the combinations of these ratings.
Halberstadt A.G., Denham S.A., Dunsmore J.S. [7] posited three main components of SEC: 1. Sending emotional
message; 2. Receiving emotional message; 3. Experiencing emotion. The authors also noted a number of
additional factors that are not part of socio - emotional competence, but may affect it, such as world outlook, self
- concept, self - esteem, temperament, knowledge about the social rules, strategies of interaction, motivation of
affiliation, flexibility of behavior and attitudes etc. It is suggested to conduct assessment in ethological conditions
or with usage of a videotape reflecting different live situations. The child is asked to press a button when he
believes that the hero has to say or do something and to transmit the contents of further messages. The task
indicates child’s ability to comprehend, when and where emotions that one feels may or should be expressed, to
understand the reason for the emotion and to denote the core of the emotional signal. Halberstadt, Denham and
Dunsmore believe that manifestation of social emotional competence occurs in free interaction of children, and
observations on children emotional reactions, facial expression and behavior are the most effective tools of
diagnostics. Surveys are applied both during children leisure time with their spare activity and in specially
organized situations [7].
Pons F., Harris P.L., Marc de Rosnay [8] relying on developed by them concept of emotional competence,
according to which it embraces nine components, suggest measuring each of these components: 1. Recognition;
331
Kristina Parhomenko / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 146 ( 2014 ) 329 – 333
2. External cause; 3. Desire; 4. Belief; 5. Reminder; 6. Regulation; 7. Hiding; 8. Mixed; 9. Morality. For the first
two components the authors employ cards with painted on them faces, expressing four basic emotions: happiness,
sadness, fear, anger and neutral "all right" for diagnosis, as well as cards, depicting a little story, life situation,
and ask a child to specify which of these emotions each of the involved characters experiences. For exploring the
component “Desire” experimenters add a description of hero’s desires and preferences to the procedure.
Evaluation of “Belief” component involves a false-belief task with information open to a child, but concealed for
the hero. Assessment of “Reminder” implies a story from the past with indication of feelings that the hero
experienced then and a story of the present time connected with the previous one, the question about hero’s
emotions, with usage of the five cards, remains the same. They evaluate “regulation” by modeling an emotionally
intense situation, offering a child some strategies to cope with emotions and asking which way the hero is going
to behave. For “Hiding” assessment the authors suggest a story in which the hero finds himself in an unpleasant
situation and conceals his true emotions, a child is supposed to answer how the hero really feels. Understanding
of mixed feelings is tested relying on a story where the hero experiences ambivalent emotions, and a child is
offered cards with combinations of four basic emotions. Rating “Morality” is conducted with a story in which the
hero makes something bad, experimenters discuss hero’s behavior with a child and ask him how the hero feels
now [8].
Some researchers state that technique by Reynolds & Kamphaus, The Behavior Assessment System for Children
- 2 (BASC- 2) [9], can be applied as a diagnostic tool for the study of child’s social and emotional domain. The
method offers an integrative approach to the assessment of behavioral and psychological characteristics of a child
from 2.5 to 18 years old. Information from a perspective of a child, his parent and teacher is collected and
analyzed, besides, the data about child’s development history and the results of observation, conducted by
experimenters, are also considered. Checklist for a child composes a subjective report about emotions, perception
and behavior singularities. BASC- 2 includes the scale that reflects external problems (hyperactivity, aggression,
etc.), the internal problems (anxiety, depression, etc.), school problems (attention difficulties, learning
difficulties, etc.), adaptability (social skills, leadership, etc.). The methodology is standardized in the United
States, there are both general and clinical norm samples. Combined–sex and separate-sex norms are provided for
each norm sample [9].
The Mayer – Salovey - Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test - Youth Version (MSCEIT-YV) [10, 11] measures
the emotional intelligence through a series of objective and impersonal questions. It tests the ability of the
respondent to perceive, use, understand, and regulate emotions. Based on typical scenarios of everyday life,
MSCEIT evaluates how well people can cope with the challenges and problems of socio - emotional domain,
rather than build the assumptions on their subjective answers about their skills. The test implements a diversity
of tasks to assess a child’s capacity of dealing with emotional and social information by strictly addressing their
abilities. This model also helps overcome social desirability and the cases when a person wants to “fake good”.
The procedure includes four basic scales:
1. Perceiving emotions (faces, pictures);
2. Using emotions to facilitate thought (facilitation, sensation);
3. Understanding emotions (changes, blends);
4. Regulating emotions (emotion management, emotional relations) [10],[ 11].
Among the most famous Russian methods for determining the level of emotional competence of children,
Izotova’s [12] technique is related. The procedure investigates the indication’s particularities of emotions of
different modalities in children; individual features of emotional development; the qualification of the level of
voluntary emotion’s expression of different modality (joy, anger, sadness, fear, disgust, contempt, envy); the
detection of the scope of emotional experience and emotional notions; identification of emotional tension. This
technique consists in:
xdemonstrating pictograms and images of human faces with different emotional expressions, cards
depicting various situations involving emotions;
332 Kristina Parhomenko / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 146 ( 2014 ) 329 – 333
xdescribing the emotional state and relevant life situations;
xgeneralization of expressive and impressive emotion components;
xplay, verbalization , drawing the identified objects;
ximitation of emotional state, intensification of facial musculature;
xvoluntary regulation of emotional expression;
xprotocol fixation of different emotional display [12].
A few years ago Kruse - Brooks [13] approved a diagnosis method for social competence, designed by the
author for her research. The evaluation was conducted for motivational, communicative and activity components
of competence. The ratings were received from teachers who were asked to fill out a questionnaire and assess 20
especially singled out children's skills and abilities by ten – point scale. The procedure was standardized and now
allows determining the development of the child’s social competence by levels. Level 1 - start - is characterized
by the ability of pupils to establish and maintain relationships with different people, but not with different social
groups; communication proceeds rather intuitively. Level 2 - "low" one – is noted when a student is able to hear
and understand another point of view, knows how to coordinate joint actions, but has difficulties with
implementing his knowledge. Level 3 - "medium" – is marked by child’s interest in communication, leading a
productive dialogue, an ability to accept different social roles and to freely express own opinion. Level 4 - "high"
– is established when a child reveals all components of social competence; comprehends the meaning of adapting
communication style to a certain communicative situation; has his own system of behavior regulations based on
his values and meanings in dealing with people; uses previous experience in organizing joint activity and is
capable of correcting individual and cooperative actions in accordance with the intended purpose [13].
Described methods offer us the tools to estimate the developmental level of the social emotional competence’s
components in children, but do not provide an overall view of the social context and child’s place in it. Therefore,
one of the directions for further work is comparing and matching exposed by questionnaires profiles of the
various components of emotional competence with observations, based on worked out criteria, in meaningful and
emotionally saturated situations for children. The second line of future research is modeling such kind of
situations that would require natural demonstration of the developmental level of child’s social emotional
competence and manifestation of its distinct components. Such situations should be specially organized, and
observation criteria have to be singled out.
Moreover, there are few techniques aimed to work with primary school children, though it is the age of a
dynamic evolution of socio – emotional competence. Due to all the changes a child undergoes and so many
things he has to deal with, having entered school, it is also a period when a number of requests for diagnostics,
consultation and intervention, subsequently, increases greatly, as from parents, as from teachers. But even smaller
quantity of methods implementing the principle of unity of diagnosis and correction, that would allow us
conducting pinpoint intervention paths, are developed by now. For a more general and complex approach there is
a need in elaborating a technique that would enable us to create a portrait of social - emotional sphere of a child,
collating assessments made by a child himself, his parent and a social educator, constantly interacting with the
child, and then to outline an intervention program that would develop low components of SEC relying on child’s
strengths. Also the procedure needs the worked out criteria for observing child’s behavior in emotionally
significant situations which would be connected with the data collected from a survey of experimentally designed
communicative situations for a child and peers and for a child and adults to create a complete notion of the
developmental level of child’s social emotional competence.
References
[1] Andreeva G.M. Social Psychology, Moscow: Aspect Press; 1996 [in Russian].
[2] Jukov J.M., Petrovskaya L.A., Rastyannikov P.V. Diagnosis and development of communicative competence,
Moscow: MSU; 1990[in Russian].
333
Kristina Parhomenko / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 146 ( 2014 ) 329 – 333
[3] Petrovskaya L.A. Theoretical and methodological problems of socio – psychological training. Moscow:
Moscow University Publ.; 1982 [in Russian].
[4] Mayer, J. D. & Salovey, P. What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. Sluyter (Eds). Emotional
development and emotional intelligence: Implications for educators, New York: Basic Books.; 1997, p. 3- 31.
[5] Weare K. Developing the emotionally literate school, London: Paul Chapman; 2004.
[6] Goleman, D. P. Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ for Character, Health and Lifelong
Achievement, New York: Bantam Books; 1995.
[7] Halberstadt, A.G., Denham, S.A., & Dunsmore, J.C. Affective social competence, Social Development; 2001,
10, 79 - 119.
[8] Pons, F., Harris, P. L., & de Rosnay, M. Emotion comprehension between 3 and 11 years: Developmental
periods and hierarchical organization, European Journal of Developmental Psychology; 2004, 1(2), p. 127-152.
[9] Reynolds, C. R. & Kamphaus, R. W. (Eds.) Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of
children: Personality, Behaviors, and Context (2nd ed.), New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2003.
[10] Peters C., Kranzler J.H., Rossen E. Validity of the Mayer - Salovey - Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test:
Youth Version - Research Edition, Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2009, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 76-81.
[11] Rivers S.E., Brackett M.A., Reyes M.R., Mayer J.D., Caruso D.R., and Salovey P. Measuring Emotional
Intelligence in Early Adolescence With the MSCEIT-YV: Psychometric Properties and Relationship With
Academic Performance and Psychosocial Functioning, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment; 2012, vol. 30,
no. 4, p. 344- 366.
[12] Izotova E.I., Nikifirova E.V. Child’s emotional sphere: Theory and practice, Moscow: Academia Publ.
Center; 2004 [in Russian].
[13] Kruze – Brooks O.A. Pedagogical model of social competence formation in primary school children,
Bulletin of Novgorod State University; 2007, 42, p.34- 36 [in Russian].