The conservation of biological diversity is a high priority in managed forests of the southern United States. Forest certification programs require participants to have biodiversity management programs in place supported by up-to-date science and, in some cases, to have guidelines for retention of important stand-level habitat features important to wildlife. To meet this information need, we reviewed the scientific literature for information on relationships between stand-level habitat features and wildlife communities. Within this report, we give definitions and general characteristics of habitat features considered particularly important to wildlife management in southern forests. Because of the prominence of pine plantation management in the southern U.S., particular attention is paid to research performed in southern pine systems. We follow with a comprehensive examination of wildlife relationships to each habitat feature and an analysis of information gaps and research needs. We selected five habitat features for review: coarse woody debris (CWD), snags, den trees, isolated wetlands, and streamside management zones (SMZs). These features have demonstrated potential for impacting diversity, though their contributions in pine systems are not always well-documented. There were indications of other features with potential impact (e.g., fork-topped pines, roads), but there was as yet little evidence of their importance. Coarse woody debris (CWD) is used by a great number of wildlife species; however, few manipulative experiments have been performed in southern pines to determine whether this use is obligatory or facultative. While some species have shown responsiveness to CWD, benefits supplied by pine litter may substantially overlap those supplied by CWD in other forest types. Snags increase wildlife species diversity and richness by providing nesting and roosting sites for cavity-nesting species and foraging sites for insectivores. The effects of snag density are generally well-documented, at least for avian communities; however, the impact of snag distribution on communities of snag-dependent wildlife, both within stands and across the landscape, has not been adequately investigated. Den trees are mostly confined to hardwood species, and can contribute multiple habitat values such as mast and vertical structure. Den users are often highly selective, and may take into account features of the den itself, the immediate habitat, or the surrounding landscape. Den tree research in pine-dominated landscapes is almost completely lacking, and study of den trees in SMZs and retention patches could provide much-needed information regarding optimum density, juxtaposition, and distribution. Isolated wetlands, while individually managed at the stand level, involve definite landscape-scale considerations as well. Species associated with isolated wetlands may spend most of their life cycle in adjacent uplands, requiring knowledgeable management of both wetland and upland to insure their contribution to biodiversity. The impacts of silvicultural practices on communities associated with isolated wetlands are not well known, and most of the research conducted in pine systems is of limited scope. Long-term manipulative experiments, complete with pre-treatment data and adequate replication, are critical to understanding the disturbance regimes to which wildlife communities associated with isolated wetlands in different regions are best suited. Streamside management zones also involve both stand- and landscape-scale consideration. Because they contain a heterogeneous mix of habitat elements not always found in pine plantations, SMZs have the potential to greatly increase biodiversity in pine-dominated landscapes, to provide refuges for disturbance sensitive species, and to serve as population sources for recolonization of disturbed sites. Studies regarding the impact of SMZ width in pine-dominated landscapes have produced inconsistent and even conflicting results, and it seems unlikely that a single recommended width will suffice for all situations. Management of sites adjacent to SMZs may have as much or greater impact than SMZ width. We suggest research goals and methodology to address information gaps and research directions in southern pine forests. Long-term manipulative experiments are encouraged both to increase the power of researchers to test hypotheses and to account for long-term variation in wildlife populations. Wildlife responses to habitat manipulations should be measured using demographic characteristics rather than density alone. Statistical methods such as multivariate analyses should be brought to bear on questions of community ecology and response to habitat characteristics. Studies performed in natural pine and pine-hardwood forests can provide baseline material for comparisons with managed pines. There also is a need to improve knowledge of the impact of silvicultural actions, including herbicide use, on the dynamics of snags and CWD, and to develop reliable landscape-scale models to predict the results of management on stand-level habitat features. © 2008 by the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc.