Content uploaded by Sjirk J Westra
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Sjirk J Westra on Mar 21, 2018
Content may be subject to copyright.
Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux
Abstract
Ultrasound is a new test proven to be sensitive in the demonstration of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Following reflux seen with ultrasound various symptoms can be observed in physiological circumstances, and thereby a causal relationship between reflux and these symptoms can be observed in physiological circumstances, and thereby a causal relationship between reflux and these symptoms can be proven. We performed a study in 220 children suspected of GER to determine the incidence of sonographically demonstrated "symptomatic reflux" in different clinical groups: children with (1) vomiting only, (2) respiratory symptoms, (3) attack-like symptoms, and (4) pain and irritability. Overall, GER was demonstrated in 78% of all 209 children in whom technically satisfactory studies could be performed. This reflux was associated with symptoms in 32% of the cases. Symptomatic reflux was most frequent in group 3, which included children investigated for near-miss sudden infant death syndrome. The symptoms that were noted most frequently were vomiting, motor unrest, coughing, and wheezing. Apnea, bradycardia and attacks of unusual posturing could incidentally be related to reflux. Ultrasound is a cheap, simple, noninvasive, and physiological test to show clinically significant reflux.
Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in children is very common and refers to the involuntary passage of gastric contents into the esophagus. This is often physiological and managed conservatively. In contrast, GER disease (GERD) is a less common pathologic process causing troublesome symptoms, which may need medical management. Apart from abnormal transient relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter, other factors that play a role in the pathogenesis of GERD include defects in esophageal mucosal defense, impaired esophageal and gastric motility and clearance, as well as anatomical defects of the lower esophageal reflux barrier such as hiatal hernia. The clinical manifestations of GERD in young children are varied and nonspecific prompting the necessity for careful diagnostic evaluation. Management should be targeted to the underlying aetiopathogenesis and to limit complications of GERD. The following review focuses on up-to-date information regarding of the pathogenesis, diagnostic evaluation and management of GERD in children.
In previous years, the role of gastroesophageal (GE) ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been disputed. Most authors believe that it is difficult to diagnose GERD without correlation studies between esophageal pathology and ultrasonographic signs. Indeed, there are many anatomic descriptions of the normal GE junction. The fact that GERD diagnosis was made by morphological studies was believed to be an incorrect deduction. We revisit the pathophysiologic data concerning the gastroesophageal junction and gastric function and review the data in the literature of the past 30 years.
The diagnosis of congenital and acquired pathologies of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract in children is quite challenging, and this is an understatement for many reasons. First, it involves a large number of diseases, many of which are not well known by general radiologists. Second, young children are not capable of verbal communication (although crying is a way of expressing discomfort, the authors do not consider this as an optimal means of communication). From this perspective, pediatric radiology has much in common with veterinary medicine. Third, children may not be as cooperative as one would desire, and the same goes for the parents who are often overanxious and demanding. Finally, pediatricians have the tendency to upgrade the meaning of “emergency”.
The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) maybe suspected on the basis of clinical history and physical examination, and is confirmed with the aid of a number of other investigations. Most cases are diagnosed based on barium radiography and extended pH studies, with the support of endoscopy with biopsies, nuclear scans, and esophageal manometry. All of these are dealt with in other chapters. This chapter will deal with several other modalities for diagnosing GER which are used more infrequently: ultrasonography and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL).
In 1935, Winkelstein proposed a new pathological entity called peptic esophagitis [1]. Several years later the term reflux esophagitis was introduced to indicate the pathophysiological mechanism underlying the disease [2]. It was later demonstrated that gastroesophageal reflux (GER) may occur even in the absence of esophagitis, and the more comprehensive term gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was introduced, to include disturbances and disease processes due to GERD that involve other organs besides the esophagus. Specific attention has been drawn to diseases of the respiratory tract: association with asthma (although hypothesized by Sir W. Osler a long time ago [3] and sporadically mentioned thereafter [4, 5] and chronic bronchitis was described in the late 1970s [6–8] with a progressively increasing interest [9–19], whereas an association between reflux and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) was suggested in the 1960s [20] and confirmed successively [21–25]. Other respiratory disturbances such as persistent chronic cough [26–29] and nocturnal asphyxia in children [30] were reported later than asthma and IPF. Further associations, although not supported scientifically have been suspected (e.s. bronchiectasis, hemoptysis). Proof has been given regarding the relationship between GER and hoarseness [31] or far more severe upper airway diseases [32, 33] such as acute or chronic laryngitis [34–38], laryngeal ulcers [39] and even glottic carcinoma [40, 41].
Background: The ability of gastroesophageal reflux disease to provoke asthma is controversial. Recent reports have suggested that reflux to the proximal esophagus may be especially likely to aggravate asthma, but the prevalence of proximal reflux in children and adolescents is poorly documented. It is also unclear how sensitive and specific the commonly used tests of reflux, barium swallow, and scintiscan are compared with pH probe studies in young patients. There is limited information on the effectiveness of the combination of H-2 blockers and prokinetic agents in controlling reflux in children. Objective: There were three objectives in this study: (1) to determine the prevalence of both proximal and distal gastroesophageal reflux in asthmatic children and adolescents; (2) to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of barium swallow and scintiscan studies; and (3) to determine the effectiveness of standard antireflux pharmacotherapy. Methods: A 24-hour, 2-channel pH probe study was carried out in 79 asthmatic children aged 2 to 17 years. The prevalence of abnormal proximal and distal gastroesophageal reflux was calculated from the findings. In 63 of these patients, barium swallow and Technetium99 scintiscan were carried out and the findings used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of these studies relative to pH probe. In 11 subjects a follow-up, 24-hour pH probe was carried out after at least 3 weeks of therapy with an H-2 blocker and prokinetic agent to determine the efficacy of therapy. Results: There was abnormal proximal esophageal reflux in 64.5% of subjects and abnormal distal reflux in 73.4%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of barium swallow were 46.1%, 83.3%, 82% and 51%, respectively. Those of scintiscan were 15%, 72.7%, 50% and 32%, respectively. Of 11 subjects studied by repeat pH probe, 10 had persistent abnormal reflux. Conclusion: Abnormal reflux into the proximal esophagus occurs in the majority of asthmatic children with difficult-to-control disease. The barium swallow and scintiscan compare poorly with pH probe in diagnosing reflux. Treatment of reflux with recommended does of H-2 blockers and prokinetic agents has a high failure rate, and follow-up studies are essential.
Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a common condition in paediatrics. Several diagnostic test have been proposed to identify the thim border between the physiologic and the pathologic GER. The esophageal ecography has been proposed as screening test for its low cost and low invasiveness. The aim of our study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy (in terms of specificity and sensibility) of the ecography versus the esophageal 24 hours pHmetry. 91 couple of exams, obtained from 87 symptomatic children, were compared in terms of pathologic and non pathologic report. We found a high number of false positive ecography results; the sensitivity was 84% and the specificity was 10%. No differences were found in the different age Groups (from 2 weeks to 5 years of age), nor in Groups related to the different symptomatology («tipical» - chronic or acute respiratory disease - CNS disorders - plurimalformative associations). The ecography can't be used as screening test in the diagnostical trial for pathologic GER for its low accuracy.
In 30 young children suspected of gastroesophageal reflux (GER), the G–E junction was examined with ultrasonography directly after a feeding while these children were on overnight extended esophageal pH monitoring (EEpHM) (32 simultaneous ultrasound/EEpHM studies). The two tests showed 81% to 84% agreement in the detection of the presence or absence of GER, depending on whether the whole period of EEpHM or only the part of it covering the ultrasound observation period were used as the standard. The discrepancies between the two tests were explained by the much longer monitoring period of EEpHM compared to ultrasonography and the inability of EEpHM to show reflux of neutralized gastric contents directly after milk feedings. The two studies probably measure different aspects of clinically significant reflux and must be correlated with the clinical symptoms. Morphological findings associated with significant reflux were (1) a short intra-abdominal part of the esophagus, (2) a rounded gastroesophageal angle, and (3) a “beak” at the gastroesophageal junction. Barium meal findings confirmed these sonographic signs, indicating a sliding hiatal hernia of the distal esophagus, either fixed or intermittent. Ultrasonography can be recommended as a useful and physiological screening test to demonstrate clinically significant GER and a predisposing hiatal hernia of the esophagus in symptomatic children.
Respiratory distress, apnea, and chronic pulmonary disease since birth were identified in 14 infants who also had symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. Birth weights varied from 760 to 4,540 gm. All infants had radiographic changes similar to those in bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Cessation of apnea and improvement of pulmonary disease occurred only after medical (8) or surgical (6) control of gastroesophageal reflux. Simultaneous tracings of esophageal pH, heart rate, impedance pneumography, and nasal air flow in five infants demonstrated that reflux preceded apnea. Apnea could be induced by instillation of dilute acid, but not water or formula, into the esophagus. Prolonged monitoring of esophageal pH more than two hours after feeding in 14 other infants less than 6 weeks of age (birth weight 780 to 3,350 gm) without a history of recent vomiting indicated that reflux was not greater than in normal older children.
Symptomatic infants displayed three patterns of gastroesophageal reflux after drinking apple juice (20 ml/kg or 300 ml/m2 of body surface area). The type I pattern occurred in patients who had continuous postcibal gastroesophageal reflux, large hiatal hernias and frequently required an antireflux operation. A functional motility disorder suggesting delayed gastric emptying appeared to be important in infants with discontinuous reflux (type II pattern). These infants had frequent gastroesophageal reflux for only 2 3/4 hours postcibally, antral-pylorospasm, increased low esophageal sphincter pressures, and a high incidence of pulmonary symptoms and non-specific watery diarrhea. The mixed (type III) pattern of gastroesophageal reflux occurred in a small number of infants and exhibited features of both type I and II patterns.
Gastroesophageal pH monitoring and reflux scintigraphy were simultaneously performed in 65 children, who were being investigated for suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease. The aim of the study was to compare, peak per peak, the information provided by the two techniques during a 1-h simultaneous-recording period. During this period, 123 reflux episodes were recorded with both techniques, but only six occurred simultaneously. Significantly more reflux episodes were recorded on scintigraphy (n = 88; p less than 0.05), particularly during the first half-hour period (n = 62), if compared with the number of pH drops greater than 1 unit, even at pH levels higher than 4 (n = 41; p less than 0.05). It is concluded that the two techniques explore differently the reflux phenomenon.
Prolonged intraesophageal pH recording, an important test in the evaluation of children with suspected gastroesophageal reflux (GER) disease, may be performed and evaluated by markedly different methodologies. Twenty-four-hour intraesophageal pH recordings from 67 consecutive infants were evaluated by three scoring methods: early postprandial, late postprandial, and total recording. In addition, the scoring methods were evaluated for their ability to identify 20 infants with clinically defined GER-induced acute life-threatening events (ALTEs). There were significant positive correlations between each pair of scoring systems (early postprandial with late postprandial, early postprandial with total recording, and late postprandial with total recording). However, our data indicate that the three methods identify different groups of patients. The early and late postprandial methods disagreed in designating "normal" versus "abnormal" in approximately 20% of patients. The total recording method was more likely to label patients as normal than either of the other methods; it yielded normal results in approximately one half of patients abnormal by either the early or the late postprandial methods. Patients with GER-induced ALTEs were identified by the early postprandial method in 90% of cases, the late postprandial method in 95% of cases, and the total recording method in only 45% of cases. By applying three different scoring methods to the same 24-h intraesophageal pH recording, we demonstrated less-than-perfect correlation among the methods. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine if these differences are of clinical significance. We feel that effort should be directed toward standardizing the approach to intraesophageal pH monitoring in infants.
Sonography appears highly sensitive in characterizing the severity of gastroesophageal reflux, screening the infants at risk of esophagitis. Sonography is also useful in evaluating efficacy of treatment. In our experience reflux is only damaging if constantly repeated and related to severe hiatal dysfunction. Ultrasound (US) is a good alternative for the assessment of hiatal function and gives furthermore indispensable morphological data.
Clinical evaluation and prolonged esophageal pH monitoring were performed before and during treatment with cisapride (0.3 mg/kg t.i.d.) for 1 month in 19 children with reflux-associated bronchopulmonary disease. Results (mean +/- SEM) show that cisapride significantly decreases the frequency of long duration (greater than 5 min) reflux episodes (from 9.7 +/- 0.7 to 5.7 +/- 1.2), the percentage of total time pH was less than 4 (from 15.9 +/- 2.5 to 7.7 +/- 1.1%), the percentage of time pH was less than 4 at night (from 18.0 +/- 3.9 to 4.9 +/- 1.5%), the duration of the longest reflux episodes (from 44.5 +/- 6.4 to 19.7 +/- 2.7 min), as well as the duration of reflux at night (from 100.1 +/- 28.0 to 28.2 +/- 10.1 min). The frequency of reflux episodes, however, remains unaffected by cisapride. Cough fits at night disappeared completely in 12 out of 13 children. We conclude that cisapride given for 1 month significantly decreased gastroesophageal reflux as well as cough episodes at night.
The incidence and temporal patterns of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in infants presenting with an apparent life-threatening event (ALTE) was compared with GER characteristics of infants evaluated for persistent emesis, utilizing continuous 24 h intraesophageal pH monitoring. These data indicate that the incidence of significant GER was similar in both groups, despite the absence of a clinical vomiting history in 46% of ALTE patients. Furthermore, infants with ALTE demonstrate a significantly higher incidence of sleep reflux when compared with control infants presenting with vomiting alone (27 vs. 0%, p less than 0.001). Awake GER beyond the first two postprandial hours was not observed in either study group. Monitoring results, therefore, indicate that significant GER is common in infants with ALTE; and these infants manifest an apparently unique pattern of GER distinct from that observed in age-matched controls with GER alone. Possible relationships between GER in ALTE patients and the development/onset of apneic episodes are discussed.
We studied the effects of positional treatment and cisapride (a new prokinetic agent) on the incidence and duration of gastroesophageal reflux in 22 infants (4-26 weeks old) in asleep, awake, fasted, and postcibal periods. In addition to gastroesophageal reflux (assessed by 24-h continuous esophageal pH monitoring), all infants presented with a disrupted irregular sleep pattern ("respiratory dysfunction") (assessed by a simultaneously performed cardiopneumogram). Reflux was particularly prominent during the sleep and fasted periods. Investigations (cardiopneumogram and esophageal pH monitoring) in the study population were repeated under treatment conditions (cisapride) after 13-16 days. All pH monitoring data with regard to the total investigation time decreased significantly (p less than 0.001). The treatment-related differences were largest in the asleep and fasted periods, but treatment data were not completely within normal ranges (established in age-matched asymptomatic infants), as they were for the awake periods. Associated symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux (belching, cough, nocturnal wheezing, irritability, and restlessness at night) were evaluated before and during treatment by history. A combination of positional treatment and cisapride seemed effective (objectivated by pH monitoring data and clinical improvement); cisapride did not cause adverse reactions. The disrupted sleep pattern improved significantly or disappeared (p less than 0.001) in all infants. These data suggest that in a number of young infants, gastroesophageal reflux may be associated with a disturbed, irregular sleep of poor quality, which is characterized by a typical breathing pattern (multiple, irregularly repeated, short apneas).