... In this paper we argue that this view is insufficient for conceptualizing engagement (see also Nunan, Sibai, Schivinski, & Christodoulides, 2018), particularly in organizational contexts: recent organizational and occupational psychology research (e.g., Costa, Passos, & Bakker, 2014;García Buades, Martínez-Tur, Ortiz-Bonin, & Peiro, 2016;Schneider, Yost, Kropp, Kind, & Lam, 2017) suggests that engagement may also be a collective construct. The prevalence of the collective manifests in common organizational concepts like work teams (e.g., Barrick, Stewart, Neubert, & Mount, 1998), the buying center (e.g., Johnston & Bonoma, 1981), and the usage center (Macdonald, Kleinaltenkamp, & Wilson, 2016, Huber & Kleinaltenkamp, 2019. Moreover, many organizational examples anecdotally demonstrate the relevance of engagement on a collective level: Consider joint innovation projects in which employees from the customer and supplier firms work within and across internal and external organizational units. ...