ArticlePublisher preview available

Compensatory Control and the Appeal of a Structured World

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

People are motivated to perceive themselves as having control over their lives. Consequently, they respond to events and cognitions that reduce control with compensatory strategies for restoring perceived control to baseline levels. Prior theory and research have documented 3 such strategies: bolstering personal agency, affiliating with external systems perceived to be acting on the self's behalf, and affirming clear contingencies between actions and outcomes within the context of reduced control (here termed specific structure). We propose a 4th strategy: affirming nonspecific structure, or seeking out and preferring simple, clear, and consistent interpretations of the social and physical environments. Formulating this claim suggests that people will respond to reduced control by affirming structured interpretations that are unrelated to the control-reducing condition, and even those that entail otherwise adverse outcomes (e.g., pessimistic health prospects). Section 1 lays the conceptual foundation for our review, situating the proposed phenomenon in the literatures on control motivation and threat-compensation mechanisms. Section 2 reviews studies that have demonstrated that trait and state variations in perceived control predict a wide range of epistemic structuring tendencies, including pattern recognition and causal reasoning. We posit that these tendencies reflect a common desire for a structured understanding of one's environment. Accordingly, a new meta-analysis spanning the reviewed studies (k = 55) revealed that control reduction predicts nonspecific structure affirmation with a moderate effect size (r = .25). Section 3 reviews research on individual differences and situational moderators of this effect. The discussion addresses the interplay of compensatory control strategies and practical implications. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
Compensatory Control and the Appeal of a Structured World
Mark J. Landau
University of Kansas
Aaron C. Kay
Duke University
Jennifer A. Whitson
University of Texas at Austin
People are motivated to perceive themselves as having control over their lives. Consequently, they
respond to events and cognitions that reduce control with compensatory strategies for restoring perceived
control to baseline levels. Prior theory and research have documented 3 such strategies: bolstering
personal agency, affiliating with external systems perceived to be acting on the self’s behalf, and
affirming clear contingencies between actions and outcomes within the context of reduced control (here
termed specific structure). We propose a 4th strategy: affirming nonspecific structure, or seeking out and
preferring simple, clear, and consistent interpretations of the social and physical environments. Formu-
lating this claim suggests that people will respond to reduced control by affirming structured interpre-
tations that are unrelated to the control-reducing condition, and even those that entail otherwise adverse
outcomes (e.g., pessimistic health prospects). Section 1 lays the conceptual foundation for our review,
situating the proposed phenomenon in the literatures on control motivation and threat-compensation
mechanisms. Section 2 reviews studies that have demonstrated that trait and state variations in perceived
control predict a wide range of epistemic structuring tendencies, including pattern recognition and causal
reasoning. We posit that these tendencies reflect a common desire for a structured understanding of one’s
environment. Accordingly, a new meta-analysis spanning the reviewed studies (k55) revealed that
control reduction predicts nonspecific structure affirmation with a moderate effect size (r.25). Section
3 reviews research on individual differences and situational moderators of this effect. The discussion
addresses the interplay of compensatory control strategies and practical implications.
Keywords: control motivation, structure, compensatory control theory, self-regulation
People are motivated to perceive themselves as having control
in their daily lives. As a consequence, they normally respond to
events and cognitions that reduce personal control with efforts to
restore perceived control to baseline levels. What psychological
strategies do people use to compensate for low and reduced per-
ceived control? Traditional theoretical perspectives focus on peo-
ple’s tendency to bolster personal agency, or to view themselves as
capable of obtaining desired outcomes and achieving goals. These
perspectives also recognize that people shore up confidence that
particular actions will produce expected outcomes in a given
domain of experience. Other, more contemporary, lines of research
have shown that people compensate by viewing powerful external
systems (e.g., deities) as intervening or collectively operating to
control outcomes on their personal behalf.
Complementing these insights, we propose that another com-
mon compensatory strategy is to affirm nonspecific epistemic
structure—that is, to sustain interpretations of one’s social and
physical environments as simple (vs. complex), clear (discern-
able; not hidden or obscure, vague or ambiguous), and consis-
tent (stable as opposed to erratic; marked by a coherent relation
of parts vs. disordered). To elaborate, maintaining personal
control requires more than knowledge about contingencies be-
tween actions and outcomes within particular domains, such as
academics or finance. It also requires a domain-general con-
ception of the world as structured in such a way that any willful
action has a reliable chance of success. This idea can be used to
reveal patterns in social cognition and behavior that have yet to
be formally acknowledged in the control motivation literature.
It suggests that people will compensate for reduced control by
projecting structure on the world, even when no objective
structure exists. It also suggests that control reduction will
increase affirmation of structured interpretations that do not
bear in any straightforward way on the control-reducing con-
dition. In fact, control reduction may increase people’s attrac-
tion to structured interpretations that they would otherwise find
aversive.
This article was published Online First February 16, 2015.
Mark J. Landau, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas;
Aaron C. Kay, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University; and Jennifer A.
Whitson, McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin.
The authors contributed equally to this work. This material is based upon
work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number
BCS-1222047 (Mark J. Landau) and the Social Science and Humanities
Council of Canada (Aaron C. Kay). We are grateful to Lucas Keefer and
Austin Flohrschutz for their help with the literature review and meta-
analysis. Dr. Neal Kingston (University of Kansas) provided helpful com-
ments and suggestions on the meta-analysis.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Mark J.
Landau, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, 1415 Jayhawk
Boulevard, Fraser Hall, Room 426, Lawrence, KS 66045-7556. E-mail:
mjlandau@ku.edu
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Psychological Bulletin © 2015 American Psychological Association
2015, Vol. 141, No. 3, 694–722 0033-2909/15/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0038703
694
... This proposition is consistent with compensatory control theory (Kay et al., 2008(Kay et al., , 2009Landau et al., 2015). This theory states that when people experience a loss of personal control (such as during a natural disaster), they may rely on external sources of control such as powerful institutions (Landau et al., 2015). ...
... This proposition is consistent with compensatory control theory (Kay et al., 2008(Kay et al., , 2009Landau et al., 2015). This theory states that when people experience a loss of personal control (such as during a natural disaster), they may rely on external sources of control such as powerful institutions (Landau et al., 2015). People therefore may initially rely on their government during natural disasters. ...
... While both existential threat and loss of control are often raised as predictors of conspiracy beliefs (Van Prooijen, 2020; van Prooijen & Acker, 2015), our findings suggest that the effects of natural disaster risk may be due to loss of control. This supports the compensatory control theory (Landau et al., 2015), and research observing effects of loss of control on conspiracy beliefs (Whitson et al., 2022). ...
Article
Full-text available
Natural disasters have threatened human societies throughout history, however, their psychological effects on people are not fully understood. We hypothesized that natural disaster risk and lack of coping capacity are positively related to conspiracy beliefs and tested these relationships across three studies. Study 1 analyzed a global dataset (47,816 participants; 67 countries) and found support for the positive relationships between natural disaster risk, lack of coping capacity, and conspiracy beliefs. Study 2 (preregistered; N = 400) manipulated natural disaster risk, yielding the predicted effect on conspiracy beliefs. Study 3 (preregistered; N = 451) introduced an additional manipulation of coping capacity. The results supported our hypothesis that high natural disaster risk predicted increased conspiracy beliefs especially when coping capacity was low. Overall, the findings suggest that improving coping capacity might be effective for governments to reduce people's conspiracy beliefs in the context of natural disasters.
... Using CEA as an exemplar technology, this research adopts the theoretical lens of control, in particular the Compensatory Control Theory [20,27], to explore the interactions between consumers' sense of control and their perceptions and attitudes towards new agri-food technologies. CEA is considered a suitable context for this study because it is a relatively new yet rapidly developing field and is in the early stages of commercial application in society, making it not too challenging for consumers to understand its features. ...
... Control refers to the ability to influence outcomes in one's environment [28]. Personal control specifically refers to "a person's belief that he or she is capable of obtaining desired outcomes, avoiding undesired outcomes, and achieving goals" [27]. Prior research suggested that individuals have a fundamental need to see themselves as competent by securing control over their environment [3]. ...
... A sense of personal control allows individuals to psychologically defend against the anxiety associated with thinking that their environment is random or unpredictable [29]. Therefore, personal control is not only considered to be a fundamental human motivation [20,27,30,31], but also associated with several indicators of well-being, e.g., health and happiness [32,33]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Technology and innovation are important in mitigating the risks imposed by climate change in many areas, including agriculture and food production. Many novel and emerging agri-food technologies are marching their way to market; however, consumer perceptions are crucial to the adoption of new agri-food technologies which claim to be more sustainable than conventional growing systems. This study investigates how the sense of control, an important psychological factor for human behaviours, may interact with consumers’ perceptions of new agri-food technologies, and consequently affect their attitudes towards new technologies for future food production and consumption in the age of climate change. In total, 23 focus groups (n = 117) were conducted across New Zealand using Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA, a technology-based approach to food production that optimises growing conditions for plants through the regulation of environmental factors) as the exemplar technology for discussion. Findings reveal that, when climate change and the challenge of feeding the world sustainably were presented, CEA was accepted as a means to retain control over climate and environmental crises. Meanwhile, CEA was also speculated as a threat to consumers’ sense of control concerning individual body and health, social order, and ecosystem order. To manage the disruptions that CEA may impose on perceived control, consumers may adopt different strategies to compensate for the perceived loss in their sense of control.
... Therefore, when personal control is diminished or threatened, one must deal with anxiety that results from disorder and randomness (Kay et al., 2009). An effective way to restore order in the external world and reduce emotional distress is to rely on compensatory control strategies (Landau et al., 2015), such as justifying the existing system. For instance, Kay et al. (2008) found that individuals with low perceived control were more likely to support and defend external systems (e.g. the government). ...
... Regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, its unpredictable nature and severe consequences have created a strong sense of uncertainty and insecurity among affected individuals, thereby undermining their perceived control over the surrounding environment (Huang et al., 2023; and ultimately eliciting negative emotions, such as anxiety (Ben Salah et al., 2022). As theorized above, we propose that people's system-justifying beliefs can help to compensate and increase one's sense of control (see also Landau et al., 2015), especially in the face of intense uncertainty and when personal control is severely threatened (Kakkar & Sivanathan, 2017;Knight et al., 2014;Roccato et al., 2021;Whitson et al., 2015). Thus, we hypothesize that an increased sense of control mediates the relationship between system-justifying beliefs and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic (Hypothesis 2). ...
Article
Full-text available
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has had a detrimental effect on people's mental health. Drawing on the palliative function of ideologies, we suggest that people rely on system‐justifying beliefs to mitigate psychological distress during the pandemic. We conducted three studies with correlational and experimental designs to examine whether and how system‐justifying beliefs can buffer against psychological distress during COVID‐19, and whether this effect may vary across social classes. The results indicated that (a) system‐justifying beliefs alleviated psychological distress during the pandemic, (b) personal control mediated this relationship and (c) this effect was consistent across all social classes. This study provides robust evidence for the palliative function of system‐justifying beliefs during a massive global health crisis (i.e. COVID‐19).
... As such, individuals try to achieve and maintain their personal control. A threatened or otherwise diminished sense of personal control triggers various perceptual, affective, and behavioral responses, aimed at restoring that sense of control (for a review, [3]). This suggests that consumers may respond to products and services quite differently when they feel a threat to their personal control. ...
... Personal control is the extent to which an individual believes one can influence one's outcomes and achieve goals (for a complete review, see [3]). Feelings of high personal control arise when an individual believes that their efforts can lead to desired outcomes, or prevent undesired outcomes. ...
Article
Full-text available
Mysterious consumption, characterized by product purchases without knowledge of their exact nature, is gaining popularity in the modern marketplace. In two online experiments, we examined how consumers’ psychological states, particularly their sense of personal control, influence their perception and intent to purchase mysterious products in the context of purchasing a random flight ticket. Study 1 demonstrated that when consumers experience low personal control, as opposed to high personal control, they are less likely to value the uncertainty inherent in random flight tickets, resulting in decreased purchase intentions. Study 2 revealed that introducing even limited choice options to random flight tickets can enhance consumers’ appreciation of uncertainty, thereby increasing their purchase intention. This effect was especially notable among those initially hesitant to embrace uncertainty, ultimately boosting their intent to purchase. These findings deepen our understanding of consumer psychology surrounding mystery consumption and provide practical insights for marketers seeking to tailor their products and marketing appeals to consumers’ psychological states.
... Importantly, research on psychological reactance and compensatory control has shown that when individuals perceive a loss of autonomy or control, such as when they are put under surveillance, they may become motivated to restore control 5,9,[27][28][29] . To restore it, people might resist the prescribed behavior, engage in the proscribed behavior 30 , or criticize the perceived source of the threat 31,32 , which we term resistance behaviors. ...
Article
Full-text available
Past research indicates that people tend to react adversely to surveillance, but does it matter if advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence conduct surveillance rather than humans? Across four experiments (Study 1, N = 107; Study 2, N = 157; Study 3, N = 117; Study 4, N = 814), we examined how participants reacted to monitoring and evaluation by human or algorithmic surveillance when recalling instances of surveillance from their lives (Study 1), generating ideas (Studies 2 and 3), or imagining working in a call center (Study 4). Our results revealed that participants subjected to algorithmic (v. human) surveillance perceived they had less autonomy (Studies 1, 3, and 4), criticized the surveillance more (Studies 1-3), performed worse (Studies 2 and 3), and reported greater intentions to resist (Studies 1 and 4). Framing the purpose of the algorithmic surveillance as developmental, and thus informational, as opposed to evaluative, mitigated the perception of decreased autonomy and level of resistance (Study 4).
... The sense of control is a belief that one can obtain desired outcomes, avoid undesirable consequences, and achieve goals (Landau et al., 2015). It has been shown that exerting control over the environment to gain a sense of control is a fundamental need for individuals (Averill, 1973). ...
Article
Full-text available
Retailers in certain regions, such as China, have recently implemented auditory feedback in cash registers to promptly announce consumer mobile payment status, but it presents a dual effect on consumers' transaction experiences. On one hand, auditory feedback enhances consumers' sense of control over the payment, leading to increased transaction satisfaction. On the other hand, it also intensifies consumers' pain of payment, resulting in decreased transaction satisfaction. Nevertheless, our study reveals an overall positive effect of auditory feedback on transaction satisfaction. We examined the moderating role of shopping motivation (functional vs. hedonic) and found that auditory feedback can enhance transaction satisfaction for consumers with functional shopping motivation and decrease it for consumers with hedonic shopping motivation. We also explored the moderating role of quick response (QR) code payments (dependent payment vs. autonomous payment) and observed a positive effect of auditory feedback on transaction satisfaction for dependent payment but not for autonomous payment. These findings contribute to the broader research on mobile payments and retailers aiming to enhance consumers' transaction experience.
Article
Green spaces, integral to natural environments, have been extensively studied for their positive impact on mental health, yet their influence on social behavior, particularly aggression, is less explored. While prior research has predominantly emphasized the effects of actively engaging with nature, the significant role of passive nature exposure—a more common daily occurrence—has often been overlooked. We conducted two studies to explore the influence of passive green space exposure on aggression and the mediating effect of the sense of control. Study 1 ( N = 240) utilized a cross‐sectional survey to assess the relationship between passive green space exposure, sense of control, and aggression. Study 2 ( N = 260) employed a single‐factor between‐subjects experimental design to further explore these relationships in a controlled environment. The results from both studies indicated that passive green space exposure is negatively related to aggression, and that this relationship is partially mediated by an increased sense of control. Specifically, passive green space exposure was found to negatively predict aggression by bolstering individuals' sense of control. These findings underscore the potential of enhancing the sense of control through environmental factors like green spaces as an effective strategy to reduce aggression. This study enriches our understanding of the broader impacts of green spaces, extending beyond mental health to include social behaviors. We discussed both the theoretical and practical implications of our findings, highlighting how urban planning and environmental design can incorporate green spaces to foster community well‐being and mitigate aggressive behaviors.
Article
The COVID‐19 pandemic has escalated concerns regarding internet addiction. This study investigated the impact of an online photograph intervention on internet addiction and identified its effectiveness mechanisms. Individuals diagnosed with internet addiction (internet addiction test score > 36, M age = 22.85, 78.6% women) were randomly allocated to either the intervention ( n = 64) or control ( n = 81) groups. For 10 days, the intervention group was tasked with photographing “things that make you feel a sense of control in life” and writing 100‐word descriptions explaining the reason for the sense of control elicited by the image. Meanwhile, the control group participated only in the assessments. Assessments were conducted before the intervention, immediately afterward and 7 days later. A significant interaction between group and time was observed, with the intervention group showing a notable reduction in internet addiction and an increase in sense of control. The sense of control at post‐test significantly mediated the intervention's effect on reducing internet addiction at follow‐up, but only among individuals with high perceived social support. The findings indicate that online photography interventions can effectively diminish internet addiction, with a sense of control acting as a potent mechanism for intervention, particularly in individuals with substantial perceived social support.
Article
The last decade has given rise to substantial concern about democratic backsliding in the U.S. Manifestations include decreased trust in government, conspiratorial beliefs, contentious protests, and support for political violence. Surprisingly, prior work has not explored how these attitudes and behaviors relate to gun-buying, an action that provides people with the means to challenge the state. We address this topic by focusing on the unprecedented gun-buying surge during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a survey with over 32,000 respondents, we find that—relative to pre-existing gun owners (who did not buy during the pandemic) and the non-gun-owning public—pandemic gun-buyers are more likely to distrust government, believe in conspiracies, protest, and support political violence. These anti-government views and protest behaviors are especially likely among those who bought guns for political reasons. Our findings highlight a crucial dynamic underlying the recent spike in gun sales with consequences for American democracy.
Article
Full-text available
This study examined the relation between personal striving level and psychological and physical well-being. Level refers to the degree of generality versus specificity of one's goal strivings. In 3 studies, 188 Ss generated lists of their personal strivings, which were then rated on specificity level. High-level striving was associated with more psychological distress, particularly depression. Low-level striving was related to higher levels of physical illness. Correlations between striving level and self-reported symptoms were generally not as strong as those between level and the more objective illness indicators. High-level strivings were seen as more difficult and requiring more effort than low-level strivings. Results are interpreted in terms of control theory, goal-setting theory, and the repressive personality style.
Article
Full-text available
Presents an integrative theoretical framework to explain and to predict psychological changes achieved by different modes of treatment. This theory states that psychological procedures, whatever their form, alter the level and strength of self-efficacy. It is hypothesized that expectations of personal efficacy determine whether coping behavior will be initiated, how much effort will be expended, and how long it will be sustained in the face of obstacles and aversive experiences. Persistence in activities that are subjectively threatening but in fact relatively safe produces, through experiences of mastery, further enhancement of self-efficacy and corresponding reductions in defensive behavior. In the proposed model, expectations of personal efficacy are derived from 4 principal sources of information: performance accomplishments, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion, and physiological states. Factors influencing the cognitive processing of efficacy information arise from enactive, vicarious, exhortative, and emotive sources. The differential power of diverse therapeutic procedures is analyzed in terms of the postulated cognitive mechanism of operation. Findings are reported from microanalyses of enactive, vicarious, and emotive modes of treatment that support the hypothesized relationship between perceived self-efficacy and behavioral changes. (21/2 p ref)
Article
Full-text available
Although the individualism–collectivism dimension is usually examined in a U.S. versus Asian context, there is variation within the United States. The authors created an eight-item index ranking states in terms of collectivist versus individualist tendencies. As predicted, collectivist tendencies were strongest in the Deep South, and individualist tendencies were strongest in the Mountain West and Great Plains. In Part 2, convergent validity for the index was obtained by showing that state collectivism scores predicted variation in individual attitudes, as measured by a national survey. In Part 3, the index was used to explore the relationship between individualism–collectivism and a variety of demographic, economic, cultural, and health-related variables. The index may be used to complement traditional measures of collectivism and individualism and may be of use to scholars seeking a construct to account for unique U.S. regional variation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
Journals tend to publish only statistically significant evidence, creating a scientific record that markedly overstates the size of effects. We provide a new tool that corrects for this bias without requiring access to nonsignificant results. It capitalizes on the fact that the distribution of significant p values, p-curve, is a function of the true underlying effect. Researchers armed only with sample sizes and test results of the published findings can correct for publication bias. We validate the technique with simulations and by reanalyzing data from the Many-Labs Replication project. We demonstrate that p-curve can arrive at conclusions opposite that of existing tools by reanalyzing the meta-analysis of the “choice overload” literature.