Objective. To study the protective effect of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and reveal its potential intestinal microflora-dependent mechanism through analyses of the intestinal microbiota and spinal cord transcriptome in mice. Method. We measured the severity of disease by clinical EAE scores and H&E staining. Gut microbiota alteration in the gut and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the spinal cord were analyzed through 16S rRNA and transcriptome sequencing. Finally, we analyzed associations between the relative abundance of intestinal microbiota constituents and DEGs. Results. We observed that clinical EAE scores were lower in the EAE+FMT group than in the EAE group. Meanwhile, mice in the EAE+FMT group also had a lower number of infiltrating cells. The results of 16S rRNA sequence analysis showed that FMT increased the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria and reduced the abundance of Bacteroides and Actinobacteria. Meanwhile, FMT could modulate gut microbiota balance, especially via increasing the relative abundance of g_Adlercreutzia, g_Sutterella, g_Prevotella_9, and g_Tyzzerella_3 and decreasing the relative abundance of g_Turicibacter. Next, we analyzed the transcriptome of mouse spinal cord tissue and found that 1476 genes were differentially expressed between the EAE and FMT groups. The analysis of these genes showed that FMT mainly participated in the inflammatory response. Correlation analysis between gut microbes and transcriptome revealed that the relative abundance of Adlercreutzia was correlated with the expression of inflammation-related genes negatively, including Casp6, IL1RL2 (IL-36R), IL-17RA, TNF, CCL3, CCR5, and CCL8, and correlated with the expression of neuroprotection-related genes positively, including Snap25, Edil3, Nrn1, Cpeb3, and Gpr37. Conclusion. Altogether, FMT may selectively regulate gene expression to improve inflammation and maintain the stability of the intestinal environment in a gut microbiota-dependent manner.
1. Introduction
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by astroglial injury, axonal loss, demyelination, and inflammation in the brain and spinal cord [1]. The pathogenesis of MS is still unclear, but the general hypothesis is that autoimmunity, viral infection (e.g., Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)), genetic tendency, environmental factors, and individual susceptibility factors play a comprehensive role in the etiology of MS [2, 3]. Moreover, dysbiosis of the commensal gut microbiota is commonly observed in MS patients and might play a pathological role in the inception and progression of this disease [4]. Studies have linked gut dysbiosis to inflammatory bowel disease, local and systemic inflammation, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and MS [5, 6]. Therefore, modulating the microbiota to correct ecological imbalance may be a new practice to treat MS.
FMT is the transplantation of a fecal microbiota suspension from a healthy donor to a recipient, with the aim of treating or preventing disease via manipulation of the microbiome [7]. Some studies have shown that FMT may be a promising therapy option for nervous system diseases, including MS [8, 9]. It is likely that some elements of donor’s healthy gut microbiota can induce rapid production of anti-inflammatory mediators that may counteract proinflammatory cytokines [10]. Notably, fecal transplants from MS patients into germ-free mice have been found to result in more serious symptoms of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and reduce the proportions of IL-10⁺ Tregs [11]. Interestingly, gavage with the human gut-derived commensal strain Prevotella histicola has been found to bring about a dropped incidence of disease in MS mouse model. The mechanism may be a rebalance between proinflammatory response (including Th1 and 17 cells) and anti-inflammatory response (including Treg cells) [12]. These findings suggest that FMT may exert a therapeutic effect on MS patients by reshaping the intestinal flora and attenuating inflammatory responses.
In this study, we used an EAE mouse model to help develop new therapies for MS and to identify the role of intestinal microflora in coordinating the possible mechanism of FMT on MS. Subsequently, we investigated the relationship between spinal cord transcriptome and intestinal microbiota in the context of inflammation and analyzed the therapeutic effect of FMT on EAE mice. Our discoveries will provide unique insights into the mechanism of intestinal microbiome therapy for MS.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals
Female C57BL/6 mice (specific pathogen-free grade), 6-8 weeks of age and weighing 18-20 g (Ji’nan Pengyue Laboratory Animal Breeding Co., Ltd., Jinan, China), were used in the study. These mice were randomly divided into control, EAE, and EAE+FMT groups according to these experimental designs of Wang et al. and Wen et al [13, 14]. All groups of mice were raised under standard humidity, temperature, and a normal diet from day 0 to day 19. All animal studies were conducted in compliance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and carried out according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Binzhou Medical University Hospital.
2.2. Induction of EAE and Assessment of Clinical Signs
EAE was induced as mentioned previously [15]. Concisely, C57BL/6 mice were injected with 200 μg (MOG) 35-55 peptide (GenScript, New Jersey, USA) emulsified in 100 μg of complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA, Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA) and an additional 400 μg heat-inactivated mycobacterium tuberculosis (Difco, Michigan, USA) by subcutaneous injection. In addition, 300 ng of pertussis toxin (PTX, Merck Millipore, Massachusetts, USA) was injected intraperitoneally on the day of immunization and 48 hours later. Clinical signs were observed and recorded daily by 2 researchers as follows: 0, normal; 1, paralysis or staggering of the tail; 2, mild paralysis of two hind limbs or severe paralysis of one hind limb; 3, severe paralysis of both hind limbs; 4, two hind limbs were severely paralyzed and the forelimbs were affected; 5, moribund or death; and 0.5, intermediate clinical sign (Table 1).
Clinical score
Normal
0
For intermediate clinical sign
0.5
Paralysis or staggering of the tail
1
Mild paralysis of two hind limbs or severe paralysis of one hind limb
2
Severe paralysis of both hind limbs
3
Two hind limbs were severely paralyzed and the forelimbs were affected
4
Moribund or death
5