Content uploaded by Andrea Broaddus
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Andrea Broaddus on Sep 13, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
A TALE OF TWO ECO-SUBURBS
IN FREIBURG, GERMANY:
PARKING PROVISION & CAR USE
Andrea Broaddus
PhD Student, UC Berkeley
TRB January, 2010
What is a suburb?
Single-family detached homes
Car required
Freiburg, Germany
Population 200,000
Solar industry HQ
Ecological policy innovator
University town:
70% between 18 and 45
Freiburg’s “Five Pillar” transport plan
1. Transit - extensive network with trams every 3-5
minutes at peak
2. Bicycling – extensive network 100 miles of bicycle
trails, signals, bridges
3. Walking –city center pedestrian-only zone, riverfront
trails
4. Car traffic restrictions – traffic calming, street typology
of “living streets” with 20 mph speed limit
5. Parking management – no free parking, center has14
off-street garages
Transit-focused planning since 1970’s
Goal – compact
and pedestrian
oriented city
Development
focused around
transit system
“City of Short
Distances”
A multi-modal city
Freiburg has resisted the trend of increasing car use
in Germany over past 30 years
57%
31%
10%
18%
10%
27%
23%
23%
Germany
Freiburg
Car
Public Transit
Bicycle
Foot
Source: National Mobility Panel, 2007
The eco-suburb concept, 1990’s
Re-imagining suburbs as sustainable development for
families
Range of housing options at a mix of income levels,
ownership and rental
No single-family detached housing
Many planning codes were changed to meet ecological
best practice, but not parking
High standards for energy efficiency and water
conservation
Minimum parking requirement has been one spot per
residence (1:1) in national law since 1939
Ecological and child-friendly urban
design features
Green buildings – passive heating, solar power
Water management with berms, pervious
pavements
Buildings arranged in horse-shoe courtyards with
gardens and play areas on the interior
Walkable destinations include shops, restaurants,
schools, day care, library, community center
Slow (20 mph) traffic speed on all streets
Two eco-suburbs have been under
construction since 1994
193 acres
4,200 housing units
(3,300 currently)
10,500 residents (8,800
currently)
1,000 jobs
84 acres
2,000 housing units
5,000 residents
600 jobs
RIESELFELD VAUBAN, “CAR FREE”
City Center
Rieselfeld
Vauban
Eco-suburbs are just as dense as city center
Source: Freiburg Office of Planning
Eco-suburbs are transit oriented
developments (TODs)
Transit corridor as the “main street” (~1 km)
Three tram stops in district, with tram line terminating
Residences within one-third mile (.5 km) of a tram stop
Frequent (10 to 15 minute headways) bus and tram
service all day
10-15 minute ride to the city center
City Center
Rieselfeld
Vauban
Tram network - eco-suburbs are the
newest extensions
Source: Steve Melia, UWE Bristol
Eco-suburbs are also bicycle-oriented
developments
On-street - bike lanes, marked and signalized street
crossings
Off-street – separate network of pathways
Cyclists can make the 3 km trip to the city center
totally separated from car traffic
Vauban requires a bicycle parking shed at the
entrance to every residence
Both eco-suburbs are popular with
young families
FREIBURG
ECO-SUBURBS
Residents/acre
19
38-50
Households with
children
17%
38-48%
Source: Freiburg Office of Planning, 2008
Source: Freiburg Office of Planning
Rieselfeld has conventional parking
provision
1:1 ratio
Parking
garage under
every building
Free curb
parking except
on main street
Estimated
3,300 spots
Source: Freiburg Office of Planning
Vauban’s transportation plan
Guiding design principle: bicycling should be
the most convenient and driving the least
convenient option
Housing fronts onto bike paths or “play
streets,” not streets with car traffic
Provision of car-sharing vehicles
Vauban has reduced parking and
“unbundled” parking provision
Parking is purchased separately from housing at the
garage building cost, $22,000 per spot
Car free households must buy a non-existent parking
spot at the land cost of a future garage, $4,800 per
spot
Car-free households must register annually with a
declaration that they do not own a car or use one on
a regular basis.
422 car-free households
Parking garages located on the
periphery of Vauban
Source: Freiburg Office of Planning
Vauban’s “bicycle first” policy
Housing
designed so
that bicycle is
within a 2-
minute walk,
transit within
a 5-minute
walk, and the
car within a
10-minute
walk
Vauban’s “play streets”
Homes front
onto streets
with loading
access only,
no parking
allowed
Speed limit 5
kph / 3mph.
Car ownership is lower in both eco-suburbs
Vehicles
Vehicles /
1,000 residents
Freiburg
82,000
410
Rieselfeld
2,400
290
Vauban
800
170
Strong self-selection bias
Income effect assumed, (income data unavailable)
Source: Freiburg Office of Planning, 2008
Car use is lower in Vauban only
0% 50% 100%
Total Germany
Total Freiburg
Rieselfeld
Vauban: car-owning households
Vauban: car-free households
Car
Public Transit
Bicycle
Foot
Source: Freiburg Office of Planning, 2003
Note: Vauban figures reflect bus use only from 1999
Vauban household mobility survey, 2003
Questionnaire asked residents about travel habits,
particularly changes since moving to Vauban.
Many reported making significant lifestyle changes to
become less car-dependent , like increased use of
bicycles, buses, trams, taxis, and car sharing services
Car-owning households reported using their car only
slightly less frequently, but 41% used their bicycle more
often
Among car-free households, 19% had never owned or
had regular access to a car; 57% reported they gave
up a car upon moving to Vauban
Cars used for bulk purchasing
shopping trips
Source: Claudia Nobis, 2003
Cars used for leisure trips
Source: Claudia Nobis, 2003
Conclusions
Bundling of housing and parking is a pervasive norm
defended even by cities with ambitious environmental
goals
Frieburg environmentalists who wanted a “car free”
alternative had to finance it themselves, because the
city and lenders were too risk-averse
Perhaps zoning and street regulations should be
revised to allow for greater variety of housing
choices and resident self-sorting
Conclusions
Both eco-suburbs have higher transit and bicycle use,
but only Vauban residents had lower car use
Car use was discouraged by street design and speed
limits in Vauban, but most significantly through
parking policy:
Unbundling the cost of parking from housing gave a
financial incentive to forego car-ownership
Separating the parking spatially from the residential
property made it less convenient, and therefore less
attractive, to use a car
Conclusions
Rieselfeld demonstrates that building excellent
transportation alternatives like transit service and
bicycle trails is not sufficient to achieve significant
reductions in driving
Residents drove approximately the same amount as
the rest of Frieburg
To achieve a goal of reduced driving, measures
should be paired: encourage alternate modes and
discourage car use, for instance through parking
policy
Questions?
Why do we care about parking?
Land consumption, destinations are further apart,
longer travel times
Free parking means car owners are more likely to
drive than use other modes