ArticlePDF Available

Contributions to a List of First Reviser actions: Ornithology.

Authors:
  • Aves Press (publishers in zoology)
  • Trust for Avian Systematics

Abstract

A record of First Reviser actions is needed and ZooBank is apparently expected to collect these. In support of this we provide some contributions both to assist with the creation of the appropriate data fields within ZooBank and to stimulate greater awareness of the retroactivity of Art. 24.2.4 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Of 66 cases collected relating to ornithology, and solely to dual or multiple original spellings, 45 are cases where, in consequence of this Article, under the Principle of Priority, an earlier nomenclatural act requires recognition in replacement of more recent acts. In just a few cases the consequence is a spelling that has not been in recent use. We also act as First Revisers in 10 additional cases discovered during our research.
Accepted by A.Dubois: 20 Mar. 2009; published: 29 Apr. 2009 1
ZOOTAXA
ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition)
ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition)
Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press
Zootaxa 2085: 124 (2009)
www.mapress.com/zootaxa/Article
Contributions to a List of First Reviser actions: ornithology
NORMAND DAVID, EDWARD C. DICKINSON and STEVEN M. S. GREGORY
Normand David, 516 Shakespeare, Dollard-des-Ormeaux, Quebec, Canada H9G 1A2 E-mail: normanddavid@videotron.ca
Edward C. Dickinson, Flat 3, 19 Bolsover Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN20 7JG, U.K.
Steven M.S. Gregory, 35 Monarch Road, Northampton, Northamptonshire, NN2 6EH, U.K.
Abstract
A record of First Reviser actions is needed and ZooBank is apparently expected to collect these. In support of this we
provide some contributions both to assist with the creation of the appropriate data fields within ZooBank and to stimulate
greater awareness of the retroactivity of Art. 24.2.4 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Of 66 cases
collected relating to ornithology, and solely to dual or multiple original spellings, 45 are cases where, in consequence of
this Article, under the Principle of Priority, an earlier nomenclatural act requires recognition in replacement of more
recent acts. In just a few cases the consequence is a spelling that has not been in recent use. We also act as First Revisers
in 10 additional cases discovered during our research.
Key words: First Reviser, spellings, ZooBank, retroactivity, Code, prevailing usage
Introduction
Almost two years ago we considered that it would be valuable if somewhere, perhaps centrally for zoology as
a whole, a ‘register’ should be maintained of actions by First Revisers (hereinafter FR) in the context of the
International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999), hereinafter the ‘Code’, because many are now
forgotten. In proposing such a step we concluded that there would ultimately need to be a generally agreed
methodology for this. Several tasks are given to an FR to act upon, and one of these is to decide between
original spellings when two or more have been used in the original work (Art. 24.2; ICZN, 1999: 30)1. We
chose to focus on this.
Despite the considerable importance attached to the role of an FR there is, as far as we are aware, no
central record of the actions of FRs in ornithology; yet somehow check-lists and handbooks, to which we turn
for our authorities, are expected to know about and to follow the actions of FRs. The best authorities actually
reference all actions by an FR (typically in a foot-note), but this practice may be in danger of extinction.
We were aware that the ICZN (1999), in the 4th edition of the Code, had modified the role of the FR by the
introduction of Art. 24.2.4, and that this would require consideration. We were also clear that Art. 86.3
implied that unless stated otherwise this new Article would be retroactive in effect. However, we were not
certain that this was deliberate and we wished to establish what effect there might be from retroactive
application. For this reason we felt it best to put up a list that would provoke comment. Doing this for
ornithology would, we felt, be sufficient to signal a need for general reflection. We knew that certain cases
would be contentious, and we felt that if there were to be objections 76 collected cases would allow calmer
consideration of retroactivity than having single issues used to challenge the concept. Thus these
All subsequent references to any “Art.” refer to the 1999 Edition of the I.C.Z.N. Code unless we cite an earlier
Code.
DAVID ET AL.2 · Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press
‘contributions’ are intended to stimulate a discussion before decisions can lead to their insertion in the register
that we advocate.
We did not then know, but we have been pleased to learn from a recent meeting held in Paris in August
2008 organised by the ICZN (the Commission), that the proposals made for ZooBank (Polaszek et al., 2005)
have led to serious consideration of the inclusion of all nomenclatural acts and thus that FR actions may well
be stored in ZooBank, which would eventually enhance its value throughout zoology. Since the Code permits
the nullification of an FR act (Art. 24.2.5) it will presumably also become necessary for any act of
nullification to be notified to the Commission for inclusion in ZooBank.
The new Article (24.2.4) in the 1999 edition of the Code, stipulates that an author of two different original
spellings of a name is to be accepted as the FR, when he/she uses one of these in a subsequent work, and that
therein he/she is not obliged to give both spellings and so demonstrate a deliberate choice. Note, however, that
this Article does not extend to cases where there were three or more spellings.
In accordance with the Principle of Priority (Art. 23.1) the first nomenclatural act taken under the First
Reviser Principle (Art. 24.2.1) constitutes the only valid such act (Art. 23.6). Before 1 January 1999 the Code
was even handed. When two or more spellings of a name are found in the original work, the FR, including the
author of the name, was to be the first author “to have cited them together and to have selected one spelling as
correct”. That remains correct under Art. 24.2.3 where there were three or more spellings, but, when there
were just two, simple use by the original author is enough. This, if retroactivity is to apply, requires that the
subsequent works of the original author must be re-examined to see whether he acted as FR by merely using
one of his two original spellings (Art. 24.2.4).
It should also be noted that the Code does not require the FR to state explicitly that he is making a
deliberate selection; as a result, any author who cites all original spellings one way or another and uses one
formally, for example in a heading as in Peters’s landmark Check-list of Birds of the World, and is thus seen to
be selecting “one spelling as correct” (Art. 24.2.3), acts as FR and does so validly when he is the first to do so.
This has particular relevance to the second part of this paper, and is necessary background throughout.
Original spellings that are not adopted by FRs become incorrect original spellings and are not separately
available (Art. 19.3). Their predominant or even overwhelming use does not establish “prevailing usage” in
their favour because “prevailing usage” is not to be applied to such cases (Art. 23.9.1, 33.2.3.1, 33.3.1).
Two other requirements seem to apply to all FRs not just those subsequent to an original author. Firstly,
Art. 32.2.1 makes a direct connection to Art. 32.5. Secondly, Art. 34.2 requires corrections related to gender
except for nouns in apposition.
The importance of this recent innovation in the Code leads us, in this three-part paper, to begin the review
of cases with those covered by Art. 24.2.4. We follow them with those covered by Art. 24.2.3, and, finally, we
act as FRs, under Art. 24.2.3, in a few cases that we uncovered where action is needed. In each we include
such details as we believe may be needed for any future register, as well as some explanatory comments.
In addition to our own search for names endowed with dual or multiple original spellings we have had
others pointed out to us by colleagues. In each case we have checked every spelling to its original citation and
we include each such citation in our references. In each case we list the different original spellings and use
bold characters to identify the usage selected by the FR. In our reference list we also cite all the publications
where related FR actions can be found. It has been suggested that we should have drawn upon nomenclators.
We have not done this. We did examine Neave (1939–1940) and noted that he made clear that in such cases
his ‘signals’ were used to identify the first spelling, thus although he gives other spellings we do not consider
he was deliberately selecting a spelling in the sense the Code expects.
Our lists are in alphabetical order. We considered using a systematic order, but as molecular studies
continue to lead to changes such ordering would be unhelpful. For current nomenclature, our basis for listing
names as binomials or trinomials, we give what is found in Dickinson (2003). Alternatively we use the style
‘[Dickinson, 2003: 654]’ and cite a source. In the sections dealing with species-group names we have listed
them alphabetically; specific epithets originally combined with a generic name that is not now considered
applicable are given and then the word ‘now’ links them to the spelling used in a current standard work
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press · 3
A LIST OF FIRST REVISER ACTIONS: ORNITHOLOGY
(usually Dickinson, 2003). In the case of names in synonymy we note where we think they belong, giving an
authority, and if the name is too new to be in Dickinson (2003) we add [post Dickinson, 2003]. Spellings not
selected by the FR(s), if reused in our text, appear in quotation marks to signal that they are not separately
available (Arts. 19.3, 32.4). Because these names then become unavailable we do not include them in our
appendices.
We should welcome suggested additions, both of FR acts that we may have overlooked and of other
original descriptions containing two or more spellings that need formal action through the selection of an FR.
We do not here address other actions by FRs such as assigning priority to one name over another in
instances when they appeared simultaneously or are thought to have so appeared (Art. 24.2.2).
Part I. Dual spellings. First Reviser acts under Article 24.2.4
We specifically seek here to explore whether ‘historically acknowledged’ FR actions located by us are
antedated by a selection made by the authors from their own two original spellings. If they are, and of course
they have priority, then we draw attention to changes that will need to be applied to spellings in use.
In fact most results agree with usage as found in Peters’s Check-list. We add comments where they do not,
as well as further explanations where they seem to be needed.
(a) Genus-group names
(1) Acanthagenys (text) / Acanthygenys (plate) Gould, 1838a
Gould (1838b) subsequently used Acanthagenys and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 437].
Note: Mathews (1925: 87) listed both original spellings and used Acanthagenys. Bruce & McAllan (1990: 478) reported on the
use by Gould of the subsequent spelling Acanthogenys which as a subsequent spelling is no longer relevant.
(2) Acridotheres (p. 42) / Acridothera (p. 69) Vieillot, 1816a
Vieillot (1819a: 389) subsequently used Acridotheres and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 654].
(3) Asturina (p. 24) / Asturia (p. 68) Vieillot, 1816a
Vieillot (1816b: 41) subsequently used Asturina and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 110].
(4) Callichelidon (pp. 269, 303) / Callichelodon (p. 271) Baird, 1865c
Baird (1873: 460, 466) subsequently used Callichelidon, and is the FR [see Peters 1960b: 84].
Note: Peters (1960b: 84)2 cited both spellings and also used Callichelidon.
(5) Chelidorhynx (p. 930) / Chelidorynx (p. 936, foot-note) Blyth, 1843
Blyth (1852: 205) subsequently used Chelidorhynx and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 493, foot-note, where
Chelidorynx” was used].
Note: Hodgson (1844: 84) used “Chelidorynx”, citing no second original spelling, but although Hodgson provided Blyth with
the MS name he is not technically the author and thus his usage in 1844 cannot be that of an FR. Blyth (1843 : 930) mentioned
Chelidorhynx as an aside and used the combination Rhipidura hypoxantha; this specific name is variable and, as Chelidorhynx
was introduced without an indication of its gender, it is masculine (Art. 30.1.4.2) and the binomen must become C.
hypoxanthus when used in this combination.
(6) Conostoma (p. 856, plate) / Conostama (p. 857) Hodgson, 1841
Hodgson (1844: 84) used Conostoma and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 622].
That Peters was responsible for the Hirundinidae is stated on p. vi of Mayr & Greenway (1960).
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
DAVID ET AL.4 · Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press
Note: we have traced no other FR until Dickinson & Pittie (2006: 119, foot-note), who cited both spellings and used
Conostoma (p. 118).
(7) Dromiceius (p. 54) / Dromaius (p. 70) Vieillot, 1816a
Vieillot (1816d: 211) subsequently used Dromaius and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 35].
Note: Peters (1931: 9) used “Dromiceius” but did not cite Vieillot’s second spelling. Mayr (1979: 9), who cited both spellings
and used Dromaius, indicated that G.R. Gray (1840: 63) had acted as FR, and referred to Melville (1977) for the details of this
case.
(8) Erythrogonys (text) / Erythrogonus (plate) Gould, 1838a
Gould (1838b: 155) subsequently used Erythrogonys and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 134].
Note: Mathews (1913: 31) gave both spellings and used Erythrogonys.
(9) Endyptes (p. 67) / Eudyptes (p. 70) Vieillot, 1816a
Vieillot (1818: 305) subsequently used Eudyptes and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 71].
(10) Guarouba (p. 210) / Guaruba (p. 211) Lesson, 1830 (10 July, Livraison 3) 3
Lesson, 1831 (11 June, Livraison 8, index, p. 654) subsequently used Guaruba and is the FR. [Dickinson,
2003: 196, where “Guarouba” was used].
Note: Forshaw (2006: 102) believed Lesson (1831) to have acted as FR. Forshaw was correct; each part of a multi-part work
has its own publication date (Art. 21.5) and each is a separate published work (Arts. 8 and 9); therefore, Lesson is the FR under
Art. 24.2.4 as hesubsequently uses one of them [the two different original spellings] as valid in a work”. The type species
(guarouba Gmelin, 1788) of Lesson’s new genus was listed under Conurus Kuhl, 1820 by XIX Century authors until Conurus
was deemed inapplicable, and afterwards Cory (1918) listed guarouba Gmelin, 1788 under Eupsittula Bonaparte, 1853, and
Peters (1937) under Aratinga Spix, 1824. Pinto (1938) revived Guaruba and was followed by Wolters (1975), Sick (1990,
1993) and Forshaw (2006). Collar (1997) usedGuarouba” but due to Lesson’s selection this spelling is no longer available
(Art. 19.3).
(11) Hematortyx / Haematortyx (p. 266) Sharpe, 1879
Sharpe (1899: 30) subsequently used Haematortyx and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 56].
(12) Nephoecetes (pp. xviii, xxix) / Nephocaetes (pp. 140, 142) Baird, 1858
Baird (1859: 3) subsequently used Nephoecetes and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 246, foot-note, where
Nephoectes”, a typographical error, appears].
(13) Oreoscoptes (pp. xix, xxxv) / Oroscoptes (pp. 343, 346, 347, 987, 990) Baird, 1858
Baird (1859: 7) subsequently used Oreoscoptes and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 649].
(14) Paradisaea (p. 83) / Paradisea (p. 110) Linnaeus, 1758
Linnaeus (1766: 117, 166) subsequently used Paradisea and is the FR; he also used it in his Nomina Generica
(Linnaeus, 1767) and his Index Universalis (Linnaeus, 1768). [Dickinson, 2003: 518 where “Paradisaea” was
used].Note: Iredale (1948) cited both spellings and also used Paradisea. Mayr (1962: 199) used “Paradisaea” but did not cite the
other spelling. McAlpine (1979), who referred to Iredale (1948), also used Paradisea while citing both original spellings, and
stated that “Linnaeus (1766: 177, 166) consistently used the spelling Paradisea and this spelling is to be accepted as correct”.
LeCroy (1983) was right in saying that Linnaeus (1766) did not act as FR under the Code then in force (ICZN 1964), but she
overlooked McAlpine (1979) who had acted as FR by selecting Paradisea (ICZN 1964, Art. 32b and 24a).
Livraison dates come from the Bibliographie de la France.
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press · 5
A LIST OF FIRST REVISER ACTIONS: ORNITHOLOGY
(15) Pedioecetes (pp. xxi, xliv) / Pediocaetes (pp. 619, 625) Baird, 1858
Baird (1859: 12) subsequently used Pedioecetes and is the FR. [Peters, 1934: 40].
Note: Gill (1899: 23) selected Pedioecetes over “Pediocaetes”.
(16) Pooecetes (pp. xx, xxxix, 927) / Poocaetes (pp. 439, 447, 980, 994) Baird, 1858
Baird (1859: 9) subsequently used Pooecetes and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 785].
Note: Gill (1899: 23) selected Pooecetes over “Poocaetes”.
(17) Pyrenestes (pp. 159, 160, 161) / Pirenestes (pp. xii, 156) Swainson, 1837a
Swainson (1837b: 277) subsequently used Pyrenestes and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 728].
(18) Rhyncops (p. 84) / Rynchops (p. 138) Linnaeus, 1758
Linnaeus (1766) repeated his two original spellings (pp. 118 and 228, respectively). However, Linnaeus
(1767: [1331], Nomina Generica) subsequently used Rynchops and is the FR. Linnaeus (1768) again used
that spelling in his Index Universalis. [Dickinson, 2003: 153].
Note: Saunders (1896: 152) cited and usedRhynchops” from Linnaeus (1766: ‘223’ [sic]) but Linnaeus did not use that and it
is an incorrect subsequent spelling; Saunders footnoted “Originally Rynchops”. The spellingRhynchops is found in Latham
(1790: 802), who was probably the first to use this spelling.
(19) Telespyza (p. 341) / Telespiza (plate 9) Wilson, 1890
Wilson in Wilson & Evans (1899: xxv) subsequently used Telespiza and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 758,
where “Telespyza” was used].
Note: Greenway (1968: 102) listed “Telespyza” in the synonymy of Loxioides. The spelling Telespiza was also selected by
Olson & James (1986). The AOU (1998: 671) did not mention that there had been two original spellings.
(20) Thamnophilus (p. 40) / Tamnophilus (p. 70) Vieillot, 1816a
Vieillot (1816c: 308) subsequently used Thamnophilus and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 380].
(21) Thriothorus (p. 45) / Thryothorus (p. 70) Vieillot, 1816a
Vieillot (1819c: 55) subsequently used Thryothorus and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 636].
(22) Xiphoramphus (p. 929) / Xiphorhamphus (pp. 947, 986) Blyth, 1843
Blyth (1852: 147) subsequently used Xiphorhamphus and is the FR.
Note: This name is not in use; it was proposed as a substitute name for Xiphirhynchus Blyth, 1842.
(b) Species-group names
(23) aurantithorax (cover caption) / aurantiithorax (text) Beresford, Fjeldså & Kiure, 2004
Fjeldså in Dillon & Fjeldså (2005: 682) subsequently used aurantiithorax and is the FR.
Sheppardia aurantiithorax [post Dickinson (2003)]4.
(24) blakei (p. 7) / blakey (p. 10) Olrog, 1973
Olrog (1979: 243) subsequently used blakei, adding that “blakey” was a misprint, and is the FR.
Catharus dryas blakei [Dickinson, 2003: 665].
All entries relating to names in the ‘species-group’ end with a fresh and final line giving the original combination
and where needed a recent authoritative listing, usually Dickinson (2003).
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
DAVID ET AL.6 · Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press
(25) cassini (p. 205) / cassinii (plate 14, fig 25) Sclater, 1863
Sclater (1866: 613) used cassini and is the FR.
Chaetura cassini, now Neafrapus cassini [Dickinson, 2003: 250].
(26) commersoni (p. 34) / commersonii (p. 34, note 2) von Pelzeln, 1868
Von Pelzeln (1870: 353) subsequently used commersoni and is the FR.
Furnarius commersoni, now Furnarius rufus commersoni [Dickinson, 2003: 404].
(27) connectens / connecteus (p. 207) Kloss, 1918
Kloss in Robinson & Kloss (1918: 110) subsequently used connectens (a more correct derivation than
connecteus” from the Latin verb connectere) and is the FR.
Mixornis rubricapilla connectens, now Macronus gularis connectens [Dickinson, 2003: 608, who used
Macronous”; for use here of Macronus see Part II of this paper].
Note: Deignan (1964b: 320) listed “connecteus [sic]”, implying that this was the sole original spelling, but used connectens
which he apparently accepted as an emendation.
(28) eurythma (pl. 2) / eurhythma (pp. 73, 74) Swinhoe, 1873
Swinhoe (1875: 132) subsequently used eurhythma and is the FR.
Ardetta eurhythma, now Ixobrychus eurhythmus [Dickinson, 2003: 85].
(29) forsteni (text [p. 491]) / forstenii (pl. 124) G.R. Gray, 1847
G.R. Gray (1861: 362) subsequently used forsteni and is the FR.
Megapodius forsteni [Dickinson, 2003: 37, who used “forstenii”].
Note: G.R. Gray (1862: 289) also used forsteni. Peters (1934: 5) listed only “forstenii” and used that, although he cited
Stresemann (1914), who had used Gray’s selection.
(30) gundlachi (pp. 197, 202) / gundlachii (p. 194) Baird, 1865a
Baird (1873: 457, 467) subsequently used gundlachi and is the FR.
Dendroica gundlachi, now Dendroica petechia gundlachi [Dickinson, 2003: 760].
(31) haastii (p. 35) / haasti (p. 35) Potts, 1872 (Jan.)
Potts (1872, May [imprint 1871]: 204-205) subsequently and consistently used haastii and is the FR.
Apteryx haastii [Dickinson, 2003: 35].
Note: although dated 1871, the intended original description in the Transactions is associated with a title page dated May 1872.
(32) insularius / insularis (p. 117) Ramsay, 18786
Ramsay (1879: 317) subsequently used insularis and is the FR.
Gerygone insularis, now Gerygone igata insularis [Dickinson, 2003: 447].
Note: Mayr (1986: 456) cited “insularius [sic]” but used insularis without citing it as an original spelling thus signalling the
use of an emendation. Whereas insularius is a noun [a tenant], insularis is an adjective [belonging to an island].
(33) mccalli (pp. xliv [m’ccalli7], 611, 985, 990) / mccallii (p. 612) Baird, 1858
Baird (1859: 12) subsequently used mccalli and is the FR.
Ortalis mccalli, now Ortalis vetula mccalli [Dickinson, 2003: 37 where “mccallii” was used].
Usually bound opposite p. 98.
Dated 1879 by Mayr (1986: 456) but see 1929 Index to the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South
Wales.
m’ccalli loses its apostrophe under Arts. 27 and 32.3.2.1 and thus does not constitute a third spelling.
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press · 7
A LIST OF FIRST REVISER ACTIONS: ORNITHOLOGY
(34) mississippiensis (p. xvi) / misisippiensis (p. 80) Wilson, 1811
Wilson (1812: vi) subsequently used mississippiensis and is the FR.
Falco mississippiensis, now Ictinia mississippiensis [Dickinson, 2003: 100].
Note: Full details were given by AOU (1976).
(35) olivaceus (pp. xv, 264, 266, 268) / olivaceous (p. 264) Swainson 1837a
Swainson (1837b: 228) subsequently used olivaceus and is the FR.
Trichophorus olivaceus, now Criniger olivaceus [Dickinson, 2003: 572].
Note: Rand (1960: 276) used olivaceus without comment, but Benson (1999: 103) quoted both spellings and used olivaceus.
(36) polionota (p. 103) / polionotum (pp. 102, 103) Schodde and Mason, 1999
Schodde (2008: 71) subsequently used polionotum and is the FR.
Stipiturus malachurus polionotum [Dickinson, 2003: 430]
Note: Schodde and Mason (1999) stated that the name was used as a noun in apposition. Schodde (2008) cited both original
spellings, stated that “polionota” was the result of a typographic error, and selected polionotum while explicitly saying he was
acting as FR.
(37) pucherani (pl. 69) / pucheranii (text) Lafresnaye in Des Murs, 18498
Des Murs (1849) cited “pucheranii De Lafresnaye”, explicitly stated that he was quoting Lafresnaye’s
material and gave the whole description in quotation marks so that Lafresnaye must be seen as the author of
the name under Art. 50.1.1. Lafresnaye (1850), in a paper that repeats almost verbatim what Des Murs (1849)
had published, and where he confirmed (p. 379) that he was the author of the name, subsequently used
pucheranii (p. 378) and is the FR.
Xyphorhynchus pucheranii, now Campylorhamphus pucheranii [Dickinson, 2003: 425 who used “pucherani
(Des Murs, 1849)”].
Note: Peters (1951: 54) cited both spellings and used “pucherani”, but his spelling is no longer available (Art. 19.3) on account
of Lafrenaye's selection. Wolters (1977: 204) used pucheranii. At the suggestion of Alan Peterson we have re-examined the
evidence of publication to determine whether the plate may have preceded the text. It is reported that 6 plates appeared with
each part of Des Murs work (and we know of no report that the texts issued were not those for the relevant plates); in the case
of this livraison, issued in both folio and quarto editions, it seems that in the case of the quarto edition the text may have been
lacking, but that for the folio edition it was not9.
(38) pygmaea (pl. 2) / pygmea (p. 2) von Kittlitz, 183510.
von Kittlitz (1858: 432) subsequently used pygmaea and is the FR.
Nectarinia pygmaea, now Dicaeum pygmaeum [Dickinson, 2003: 702].
(39) randoni (p. 150) / randonii (pl. 11) Loche, 1860
Loche (1867: 41) subsequently used randonii and is the FR.
Galerida randonii, now Galerida cristata randonii [Dickinson, 2003: 548, who used “randoni”].
Note: Vaurie (1959: 46) gives “Galerida Randonii Loche, 1858, Cat. Mamm. Ois. Algérie, p. 85”, but we agree with Hartert
(1904: 232) that randonii, Loche, 1858, is a nomen nudum. Peters (1960a: 57)11 and de Juana et al. (2004: 595) cited and used
randoni Loche, 1860, no longer available (Art. 19.3) on account of Loche’s selection, whereas Wolters (1979: 309), Cramp et
al. (1988: 145) and Keith et al. (1992: 100) used randonii.
Text dated December 1848; wrapper date 1849.
See Bibliographie de la France (25 August 1849)
Usually dated 1833, but this is incorrect see Steinbacher (1954).
That Peters was responsible for the Alaudidae can be seen from p. vi of this work.
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
DAVID ET AL.8 · Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press
(40) rudolfi (p. 232, 234) / rudolphi (pl. VI) Meyer, 1882
Meyer (1892: 265) subsequently used rudolfi and is the FR.
Ninox rudolfi [Dickinson, 2003: 234].
(41) sancti-hieronymi (p. 190) / sancti-jeromae (plate 23) Salvin, 1863
Salvin (1866: 195) subsequently used sancti-hieronymi, now sanctihieronymi under Art. 32.5.2.4.1., and is
the FR.
Panyptila sanctihieronymi [Dickinson, 2003: 252].
(42) sauricus (p. 3) / saurensis (pp. 4, 5) Potapov, 1993
Potapov (2007: 654) explicitly stated he was acting as FR and selected sauricus.
Tetraogallus himalayensis sauricus [Dickinson, 2003: 48 where “saurensis” was used].
Note: Dickinson (2003: 48, foot-note 2) cited sauricus but used “saurensis”. E.C. Dickinson here confirms that his use of
saurensis” should not be construed as an intentional FR act and that it was he who suggested to R. L. Potapov to take formal
action as FR. Potapov’s action under Art. 24.2.4 should be recognised as the valid action by an FR.
(43) sulphurata (p. 100) / sulphurea (pl. 60) Temminck & Schlegel, 1848 (27 Nov.)
Temminck & Schlegel (1850) subsequently used sulphurata and are the FRs.
Emberiza sulphurata [Dickinson, 2003: 779].
Note: It is not known with which of fascicles 4 to 8 (1847-1848) pl. 60 appeared (Holthuis & Sakai, 1970: 74). Pl. 60 must
therefore be assumed to be from the last of these and dated 27 November 1848. Each part of a multi-part work has its own
publication date (Art. 21.5) and each is a separate published work (Arts. 8 and 9); therefore, the author, (here, Temminck &
Schlegel), is the FR under Art. 24.2.4 since he “subsequently uses one of them [the two different original spellings] as valid in
a work”. Paynter (1970: 28) used sulphurata without further indication. Kuroda (1934) and Morioka et al. (2005: 122) cited
both spellings and used sulphurata.
(44) swainsoni (p. 331) / swainsonii (pp. xxxv, 336, 999) Baird, 1858
Baird (1866: 325, 329) subsequently used swainsoni and is the FR.
Vireo swainsoni, now Vireo gilvus swainsoni [Dickinson, 2003: 484 where “swainsonii” was used].
Note: Hellmayr (1935: 151) and AOU (1957: 476; 1998: 436) used “swainsonii” without comment, but on account of Baird’s
selection this is no longer available (Art. 19.3).
(45) winchelli (p. 318) / winchellii (pl. 47) Sharpe, 1877
Sharpe (1892: 255) subsequently used winchelli and is the FR.
Halcyon winchelli, now Todiramphus winchelli [Dickinson, 2003: 287].
Conclusions from Part I
We have traced and examined 45 cases where an author acted as his own reviser, under the relaxed conditions
of Art. 24.2.4; in each case the need to select correctly has been met.
On the whole, the selections made by the author should be able to be accepted although our findings for
Chelidorhynx, Guaruba, Paradisea, forsteni, pucheranii and swainsoni require the ornithological community
to accept a degree of change since First Reviser actions are not subject to prevailing usage.
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press · 9
A LIST OF FIRST REVISER ACTIONS: ORNITHOLOGY
Part II. Dual or multiple spellings. Actions under article 24.2.3
The difference here is that subsequent FRs, i.e. not original authors, are required to cite all original spellings
and select one as correct. First, we deal with cases where neither original spelling was demonstrably incorrect;
then, we deal with those where at least one spelling was incorrect.
Cases presenting no incorrect choice (Art. 32.4 and Art. 32.5):
(a) Genus-group names
(46) Bradypterus (p. 379) / Bradyptetus (p. 241) Swainson, 1837b
Benson et al. (1978) explicitly stated they were acting as FRs and selected Bradypterus. [Dickinson, 2003:
580].
(47) Icthyophaga / Icthyiophaga Lesson, 1843
Richmond (1917: 570, foot-note) cited both spellings and is the FR as he stated that “Icthyophaga Lesson
should replace Poliaetus Kaup, 1847”. [Dickinson, 2003: 101, where “Ichthyophaga” was used].
Note: Peters (1931: 259) used Richmond’s selection. Stresemann & Amadon (1979: 302) listed “Icthyophaga [sic]” and used
Ichthyophaga12. This was not one of the original spellings and can only be an unjustified emendation of Lesson’s generic
name; they also miscited the generic name in mentioning the type species as given by Lesson (“Ichthyo…” instead of
Icthyio…).
(48) Licmetis (pp. 505, 748) / Lycmetis (p. 738) / Lycmetem [accusative case, i.e. Lycmetis] (p. 692) Wagler,
1832
Mathews (1917: 213) cited both spellings, used Licmetis, and is the FR [see Peters, 1937: 177].
(49) Macronus (pl. 150, index) / Macronous (text) Jardine & Selby, 1835
G.R. Gray (1840, 1841) used Macronus, but in neither did he give both original spellings so no FR act
occurred. However, later, G.R. Gray (1855: 41) cited both spellings and used Macronus, and is thus the FR.
[Dickinson, 2003: 608 where “Macronous” was used].
Note: it is assumed here that the index to vol. 3 of Illustrations of Ornithology accompanied part 10, in which this plate and its
text appeared, although this is not certain (Zimmer, 1926: 323). G.R. Gray’s (1840, 1841, 1855) spelling predominated until
Deignan (1964b: 318) cited onlyMacronous” and used that. In a foot-note to that, the editors, Mayr and Paynter, said that
Macronous was used by Blyth (1842) acting as FR, but this is incorrect as Blyth did not cite the other spelling; they added that
the plate is lettered Macronus and that they “would prefer to maintain this more frequently used spelling”. Although the FR act
of G.R. Gray (1855: 41) was overlooked or disputed, Cheng (1976: 619) and Wolters (1980: 389; 1982: 552) followed Mayr
and Paynter and used Macronus and gave both spellings.
(50) Myadestes (p. 132) / Myidestes (p.134) Swainson, 1838
Ridgway (1907: 160) cited both spellings, used Myadestes, and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 663].
(51) Propyrrhura (p. 7; folding table opposite p. 10; pl. 2, fig. 3 ) / Prophyrrhura (p. 18) Miranda-Ribeiro,
1920
Peters (1937: 180) cited both spellings, used Propyrrhura, and is FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 196, foot-note 3].
The correction by Stresemann & Amadon (1979) of usage by Peters (1931) demonstrates the problem with First
Reviser actions that are neither cited when used nor registered to help prevent mistaken usage of an unavailable spelling.
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
DAVID ET AL.10 · Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press
(52) Sphecotheres (p. 42) / Sphecotera (pp. 68, 70) Vieillot, 1816a
Bonaparte (1854: 539) cited both spellings, used Sphecotheres, and is the FR. [Dickinson, 2003: 486].
Note: Vieillot (1819b: 5) used Sphecothera [sic] which was not an original spelling, and G.R. Gray (1840, 1841) used
Sphecotheres without citing the other original spelling. Mathews (1921: 159) made the same selection as Bonaparte.
(b) Species-group names
(53) aemodius (p. 856) / omodius (plate) / oemodius (p. 857) Hodgson, 1841
Hellmayr (1903: 166) cited all three spellings, used aemodium (the corrected neuter form of aemodius) and is
the FR.
Conostoma aemodium [Dickinson, 2003: 622, where “oemodium” was used].
Note: Hodgson (1844: 84) employed the spelling aemodium. Hartert (1907: 413) like Hellmayr cited all three spellings but
used aemodius (now aemodium). Deignan (1964a: 431), dating the name ‘1841 or 1842’, overlooked these acts and used the
oe- spelling, but Ripley (1982) used the ae- spelling. For an examination of evidence as regards the date of the name see
Dickinson & Pittie (2006: 118). For the use of Conostoma see Part I of this paper.
(54) fascialota (pl. 111) / fasciolata (text) Smith, 1847a
Traylor (1986: 194) cited both spellings, used fasciolatus (ex fasciolata), and is the FR.
Drymoica fasciolata, now Calamonastes fasciolatus [Dickinson, 2003: 563].
(55) lebomboensis (p. 175) / lebombo (pp. 163, 205) Roberts, 1936
Clancey (1964: 375) explicitly stated he was acting as FR and selected lebombo.
Dryodromas fulvicapilla lebombo, now Cisticola fulvicapilla lebombo [Dickinson, 2003: 554].
(56) melancoripha (p. 234) / melancorypha (p. 344) Molina, 1782
Hellmayr & Conover (1948: 286) cited both spellings, used melancoryphus (ex melancorypha), and are the
FRs.
Anas melancorypha, now Cygnus melancoryphus [Dickinson, 2003: 63].
Note: Johnsgard (1979: 432) seemingly overlooked the FR act as he cited melancoripha and “melanocorypha” [sic], and used
melanocoryphus” (see David & Gosselin, 2002a).
(57) tianquanensis (pp. 373, 375, 377) / tianguanensis (p. 376) / tianouanensis (p. 374) Li Gui-yuan, 1995
Martens in Martens & Tietze (2006: 281) listed all three spellings, selected tianquanensis and is the FR.
Certhia tianquanensis [Dickinson, 2003: 648].
Cases in which an incorrect choice was possible (Art. 32.4 and 32.5):
(a) Genus-group names
(58) Psittacella (p. 35) / Psitacella (pp. 36, 60) Schlegel, 1871
Peters (1937: 251, 252) cited both spellings and used Psittacella. [Dickinson, 2003: 190].
Note: Schlegel (1871) did not cite the derivation of the name, but consistently used related names spelled with “tt” (Psittacula,
pp. 35, 60; Psittacus, pp. 35, 36), thus showing that “Psitacella” was an inadvertent error under Art. 32.5.1. Schlegel (1874)
subsequently used “Psitacella” as a genus heading and in combination with brehmii and modesta (p. 42) while using
Psittacella in combination with the specific names (p. 79).
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press · 11
A LIST OF FIRST REVISER ACTIONS: ORNITHOLOGY
(b) Species-group names
(59) behni (p. xviii) / behmi (pl. 20) Gould, 1875
Peters (1945: 158) cited both spellings and used behni.
Trogon behni, now Trogon curucui behni [Dickinson, 2003: 280].
Note: The selection conforms with Gould’s explicit internal indication in the text to the plate reading “I regret that, by a
misprint, the title has been rendered Trogon behmi instead of T. behni” which shows that “behmi” was an inadvertent error.
(60) iradii (pp. 50, 130, 137) / yradii (plate 7) Lembeye, 1850
Peters (1940: 254) cited both spellings and used iradii.
Cypselus iradii, now Tachornis phoenicobia iradii [Dickinson, 2003: 252].
Note: The selection conforms with the explicit dedication for “D. José Cayetano Iradi” in the original work. Cory (1918: 146)
cited and used “yradii” but has a foot-note saying: “It is evident that yradii is a misprint as the bird was named after Sr. Iradi
and the name appears, properly spelled, several times in the work.”
(61) luteiventris (pp. 87, 123) / luteoventris (plate XII, Fig. III) Meyen, 1834
Paynter (1970: 129) cited both spellings and used luteiventris.
Fringilla luteiventris, now Sicalis luteola luteiventris [Dickinson, 2003: 791.]
Note: The selection conforms with the author’s formal statement in his “Verzeichniss der Abbildungen” (list of plates)
indicating that “luteoventris” on the plate should be corrected to luteiventris (Meyen 1834: 123, foot-note).
(62) maronica / maranonica (p. 27) Carriker, 1933
Traylor (1979: 15) cited both spellings and used maranonicum (the correct neuter form of maranonica).
Camptostoma obsoletum maranonica, now Camptostoma obsoletum maranonicum [Dickinson, 2003: 352].
Note: The selection conforms with the internal indications (“Marañon race”, “Marañon Valley”) in the original work showing
that “maronica” was an inadvertent error.
(63) marequensis (pl. 113) / mariquensis (text, index) Smith, 1847b
Clancey (1966: 507) cited both spellings and used mariquensis, as did Traylor (1986: 302).
Bradornis mariquensis, now Melaenornis mariquensis mariquensis [Dickinson, 2003: 690].
Note: The selection reflects the view thatmarequensis” was an inadvertent error as other taxa in the original work bear the
name mariquensis.
(64) spengeli (p. 614) / spengleri (pl. 38) Hartlaub, 1885
Peters (1937: 203) cited both spellings and used spengeli.
Psittacula spengeli, now Forpus xanthopterygius spengeli [Dickinson, 2003: 200].
Note: The selection conforms with the explicit dedication to Spengel in the original work showing that “spengleri” was an
inadvertent error.
(65) swindernianus (p. 62) / swinderianus (plate) Kuhl, 1820
Peters (1937: 255) cited both spellings and used swinderniana (now swindernianus).
Psittacus swindernianus, now Agapornis swindernianus [Dickinson, 2003: 194].
Note: Agapornis is masculine (David & Gosselin, 2002b). The selection conforms with the explicit dedication in the original
work to “Theodorus von Swindern” [sic], requiring that swindernianus be the correct original spelling, although it is known
from external sources that the person honoured was actually named Swinderen (Jobling, 1991). When Selby (1836) introduced
Agapornis, he used “SWINDERN’S LOVE-BIRD” but “Agapornis Swinderianus”. David & Gosselin (2002b) used
swinderianus” as given by Selby, not noting that this was not the spelling used by Peters (1937) and the majority of authors.
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
DAVID ET AL.12 · Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press
(66) uruguaii (pp. 54, 59) / urugaii (p. 59) Hekstra, 1982
Browning (1990: 452), having earlier addressed the nomenclature of this taxon, finally explicitly stated that
he was acting as FR and selected uruguaii.
Otus uruguaii, now Otus choliba uruguaii [Dickinson, 2003: 223, where “uruguaiensis” was used].
Note: Browning (1989: 516) cited both original spellings but then deliberately used “uruguaiensis” instead of either. Not being
one of the two original spellings, the name uruguaiensis Browning 1989 is an unjustified emendation (ICZN 1985, Art. 33 (b),
33 (b) (iii); 1999, Art. 33.2, 33.2.3), and a junior synonym of a name of which the correct original spelling was not yet fixed.
Browning (1990: 452) asserted that his 1989 emendation was an incorrect subsequent spelling, but this was misconceived. An
incorrect subsequent spelling is a subsequent spelling “other than a mandatory change or an emendation” and is not
intentional (ICZN 1985, Art. 33 (c); 1999, Art. 33.3). Browning (1990: 452) also asserted that uruguaii in the introductory list
of species (Hekstra 1982: 54) is a nomen nudum; although this label is often applied in such cases we also believe it to be
technically incorrect since uruguaii is one of two spellings of an available name in the same work. That it appears some pages
before the description does not change this. By contrast a nomen nudum is a name that fails to conform to Art. 13 (Glossary,
ICZN 1985, 1999). Browning (1990: 452) stated that the repeated use of uruguaii by Hekstra (1982) indicated his intended
spelling; and, indeed, this selection by Browning (1990: 452) also conforms with the internal indication (River Uruguai) in the
original work showing that “urugaii” was an inadvertent error.
Conclusions from Part II
Of 66 cases we have examined, 45 were treated in part I (above), here we have treated the remaining 21 cases.
In these the need to comply with the requirements of Article 24.2.3 with reference to Article 35 for selection of the
correct spelling has been consistently met.
Part III. Dual or multiple spellings. Fresh First Reviser selections
During our study we came across a number of cases where an FR should have already made a selection.
Finding none we here take the actions required, in each case seeking to ensure that the correct original spelling
is used when there is one that is demonstrably correct. We believe these 10 selections also qualify for
inclusion in any central record.
(a) Genus-group names
(67) Agaia (pp. xv, xix) / Ajaia (pp. 25, xvi) / Ajaja (p. xix) Reichenbach, 1853
We hereby act as FRs and select Ajaia as the correct original spelling. [Dickinson, 2003: 83]
Note: most authors since Reichenbach used Ajaia (e.g. Peters 1931: 140; Wolters 1976; AOU 1957, 1983, 1998) but we have
found none who cited all three original spellings.
(68) Stephanoxis (p. 40) / Stephanoxys (p. 46) Simon, 1897
We hereby act as FRs and select Stephanoxis as the correct original spelling. [Dickinson, 2003: 260].
Note: Hartert (1900: 213) used Stephanoxis, and mentioned Sharpe (1900: 142) but did not say that the latter used
Stephanoxys”. Neither commented, and nor did Brabourne & Chubb (1912: xiii, 146) who used Stephanoxis. Simon (1921)
used Stephanoxis (pp. 47, 48, 282) and Stephanoxys (p. 415) and thus did not act as FR, nor did Peters (1945: 30) who used
Stephanoxis.
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press · 13
A LIST OF FIRST REVISER ACTIONS: ORNITHOLOGY
(b) Species-group names
(69) buffonii (pp. 5, 6, 8, 9 [twice on p. 9]) / buffoni (p. 7) Lafresnaye, 1845
We hereby act as FRs and select buffonii as the correct original spelling.
Picumnus buffonii, now Picumnus exilis buffonii [Dickinson, 2003: 312, where “buffoni” was used.]
Note: In addition to temminckii, Lafresnaye (1845) established buffonii on p. 6 and used it repeatedly, except that “buffoni
Nob.” appears on p. 7 in the Latin description of another taxon as a means of comparison. It is apparent that “buffoni” on p. 7 is
an inadvertent error. Inexplicably, Hargitt (1890: 544), Cory (1919: 508), and Peters (1948: 91) all used “buffoni” but cited it
from p. 6, where that spelling is not found.
(70) erythrorynchos (p. 299) / erythrorhynchos (p. 906, index) Latham, 1790
We hereby act as FRs and select erythrorhynchos as the correct original spelling, selecting the spelling in the
index as this is now widely used.
Certhia erythrorhynchos, now Dicaeum erythrorhynchos [Dickinson, 2003: 701].
Note: Like Salomonsen (1967: 186), almost all recent authors used “erythrorhynchos”, but cited it from p. 299. Inskipp et. al
(1996) indicated that “erythrorhynchos” was used by all authors they consulted for their listing, mentioned that
erythrorynchos” was the original spelling of the name, and used it in compliance with the Code then in force (ICZN, 1985:
Art. 31 b, 32 b). Inskipp et al. (1996) did not act as FRs because they were unaware that the original work contained two
different spellings.
(71) franciscae (p. 231) / francescae (p. 232) Baird, 1865b
We hereby act as FRs and select francescae as the correct original spelling.
Granatellus francescae, now Granatellus venustus francescae [Dickinson, 2003: 768].
Note: Baird (1865b: 233) stated that the bird was named for Mrs. Grayson. Lowery & Monroe (1968: 79) citedfranciscae
[sic]”, used francescae, and added “(emendation to francescae, p. 232)”. However, francescae was not an emendation, it was
one of the two original spellings.
(72) kollmanspergeri (p. 36) / kollmannspergeri (p. 59) Niethammer, 1955
We hereby act as FRs and select kollmannspergeri as the correct original spelling.
Ammomanes deserti kollmannspergeri [Dickinson, 2003: 545, where “kollmanspergeri” was used].
Note: Peters (1960a: 35) cited and used “kollmanspergeri”, but that spelling is an incorrect original spelling as the author stated
in the original work that the taxon was named for Kollmannsperger (in litt. Norbert Bahr).
(73) mesaeus (pp. 125, 126) / mescus (p. 126, twice) Conover, 1945
We hereby act as FR and select mesaeus (now mesaea) as the correct original spelling.
Penelope mesaeus, now Penelope argyrotis mesaea [in the synonymy of nominotypical argyrotis].
[Dickinson, 2003: 38, foot-note, where “mesaeus” was used].
Note: Whereas mescus cannot be linked to a Latin or Greek word, mesaeus is a latinized Greek adjective [ , in the
middle], for the intermediate characters of the taxon, showing that “mescus” was an inadvertent error. Vaurie (1966) and Blake
(1977) used mesaeus without repeating the two original spellings and failed to effect the mandatory change to mesaea as
Penelope is feminine (Arts. 31.2, 34.2).
(74) neoboria (Vol. 1, p. 154) / neoborea (Vol. 2, p. 973) Oberholser, 1974
We hereby act as FRs and select neoborea as the correct original spelling.
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
DAVID ET AL.14 · Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press
Anas neoborea, now Anas platyrhynchos neoborea [in the synonymy of nominotypical platyrhynchos].
[Dickinson, 2003: 66, foot-note, who used “neoboria”].
Note: The fact that the name ends in the Latin adjective boreus (-a, -um) is an indication that “neoboria” was an inadvertent
error. Of the two original spellings, Browning (1978: 86) only usedneoboria”.
(75) noevia (p. 268) / naevia (p. 463) Daudin, 1800
We hereby act as FRs and select naevia (now naevius) as the correct original spelling. Fry (2001: 371) made
the mandatory change in the suffix due to gender because Coracias is masculine (ICZN 1956).
Coracias naevia, now Coracias naevius [Dickinson, 2003: 282].
Note: Peters (1945: 243) cited only “noevia” from p. “258” [i.e. 268] and used it without further comment. We are advised by
R.J. Dowsett that Clancey usednoevia” as sole author in 4 works in the period 1964-1996, and in 1980 as co-author used
naevia. Wolters (1976: 116), without further comment, used naevius but Fry (1988) used “naevia”. Fry (2001: 371) offered
reasons to use the spelling naevius but was apparently unaware that there were two original spellings and thus does not qualify
as First Reviser.
(76) rothschildi (pp. 331, 344) / rotschildi (p. 331, twice) von Zedlitz, 1911
We hereby act as FRs and select rothschildi as the correct original spelling.
Camaroptera brevicaudata rothschildi, now Camaroptera superciliaris (in synonymy see Traylor 1986: 190).
Overall Conclusions
Although we detect signs that retroactive effect was intended to be given to Art. 24.2.4, the only benefit we
see this provide is the potential for a shorter search for a First Reviser in a case previously unconsidered. Had
a register of First Reviser actions already been created this might have created a pause for deeper thought. We
have deliberately not examined family group names but we are aware that retroactive application of 24.2.4
might lead to a corrected spelling for the family of birds of paradise.
Acknowledgements
The following persons kindly contributed information that assisted us in compiling this list: Norbert Bahr,
Richard C. Banks, Murray Bruce, Ronald de Ruiter, Bob Dowsett, He Fen-qi, Joseph Forshaw, Rosendo
Fraga, Michel Gosselin, Alison Harding, James Jobling, Colin Jones, Marek Kuziemko, Mary LeCroy,
Hiroyuki Morioka, Alan Peterson, James V. Remsen, Kees Roselaar, Richard Schodde and Frank Steinheimer.
We should also like to thank the referees and our editor Alain Dubois for his constructive suggestions.
References 13
AOU [American Ornithologists’ Union] (1957) Check-list of North American Birds. 5th ed. American Ornithologists'
Union, Laurel, Maryland, xiii, 691 pp.
AOU [American Ornithologists’ Union] (1976) Thirty-third supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-
list of North American Birds. The Auk, 93, 875–879.
Names found in brackets after the references appear only against the work where the original dual or multiple
spelling occurred and we indicate just one of such spellings, the objective being solely to help the reader look at the
correct original work.
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press · 15
A LIST OF FIRST REVISER ACTIONS: ORNITHOLOGY
AOU [American Ornithologists’ Union] (1983) Check-list of North American birds. 6th ed. American Ornithologists'
Union, Lawrence, Kansas, xxix, 877 pp.
AOU [American Ornithologists’ Union] (1998) Check-list of North American birds. 7th ed. American Ornithologists'
Union, Washington, D. C., liv, 829 pp.
Baird, S.F. (1858)14 General report upon the zoology of the several Pacific railroad routes. Pt. II. Birds. In: Baird, S.F.,
Cassin J. & Lawrence, G.N. (Eds.) Reports of explorations and surveys to ascertain the most practicable and
economical route for a railroad from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean Washington, 9, lvi, 1005 pp.
[Nephoecetes, Oreoscoptes, Pedioecetes, Pooecetes, mccalli, swainsoni].
Baird, S.F. (1859) Catalogue of North American Birds: chiefly in the museum of the Smithsonian Institution.
Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 2, 4, (i–ii), 1–19 [21–22].
Baird, S. (1865a) (April) Review of North American Birds, in the museum of the Smithsonian Institution. Part I.
Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 181. Signature 13 (pp. 193–208).
[gundlachi].
Baird, S. (1865b) (April) Review of North American Birds, in the museum of the Smithsonian Institution. Part I.
Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 181. Signature 15 (pp. 225–240).
[francescae].
Baird, S. (1865c) (May) Review of North American Birds, in the museum of the Smithsonian Institution. Part I.
Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 181. Signatures 17–19 (pp. 257–272,
273–286, 289–304). [Callichelidon].
Baird, S. (1866) (May) Review of North American Birds, in the museum of the Smithsonian Institution. Part I.
Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 181. Signature 21 (pp. 321–336).
Baird, S.F. (1873) List of species described. Pp. 451–478 (including index). In: Review of North American Birds, in the
museum of the Smithsonian Institution15. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Smithsonian Institution,
Washington, 181, i–iv, 1–450.
Benson, C.W. (1999) Type specimens of bird skins in the University Museum of Zoology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
British Ornithologists’ Club Occasional Publications. 4, 221 pp.
Benson, C.W., Brooke, R.K. & Traylor, M.A., Jr. (1978) Multiple original spellings of Bradypterus Swainson, 1837.
Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club, 98, 4–5.
Beresford, P., Fjeldså, J. & Kiure, J. (2004) A new species of Akalat (Sheppardia) narrowly endemic in the Eastern Arc
of Tanzania. The Auk, 121, 23–34. [aurantiithorax].
Blake, E.R. (1977) Manual of neotropical birds. Vol. 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, l, 674 pp.
Blyth, E. (1842) Report from the Curator. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 11 (128), 788–809.
Blyth, E. (1843) Mr. Blyth's monthly Report for December Meeting 1842, with addenda subsequently appended. Journal
of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 12 (143), 925–1011. [Chelidorhynx, Xiphorhamphus]
Blyth, E. (1852) Catalogue of the birds in the Museum [of the] Asiatic Society. The Asiatic Society of Bengal, Calcutta,
xxxiv, 403 pp.
Bonaparte, C.L. (1854) Notes sur les collections rapportées en 1853, par M. A. Delattre, de son voyage en Californie et
dans le Nicaragua. Huitième communication: chanteurs dentirostres. Compte rendus hebdomadaires de l’Académie
des Sciences, Paris, 38, 533–542.
Brabourne, Lord, & Chubb, C. (1912) The birds of South America. Vol. 1. R.H. Porter, London, xix, 504 pp.
Browning, M.R. (1978) An evaluation of the new species and subspecies proposed in Oberholser's Bird Life of Texas.
Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 91 (1), 85–122.
Browning, M.R. (1989) The type specimens of Hekstra’s owls. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 102
(2), 515–519.
Browning, M. R. (1990) Erroneous emendations to names proposed by Hekstra (Strigidae: Otus). Proceedings of the
Biological Society of Washington, 103 (2), 452.
Bruce, M.D. & McAllan, I.A.W. (1990) Some problems in vertebrate nomenclature. II. Birds. Part I. Bolletino del Museo
regionale di Scienze naturali, Torino, 8 (2), 453–485.
Carricker, M.A., Jr. (1933) Descriptions of new birds from Peru, with notes on other little-known species. Proceedings of
the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 33, 1–38. [maranonica].
Cheng, Tso-hsin. (1976) Distributional list of Chinese birds. Science Press, Beijing, xvii, 1218 pp. (In Chinese.)
Clancey, P.A. (1964) Birds of Natal and Zululand. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh & London, xxxiv, 511 pp.
Clancey, P.A. (1966) A catalogue of birds of the South African sub-region. (Part IV). Durban Museum Novitates, 7 (12),
465–544.
For a note on the different editions of this work see Stone (1919).
Appears only in the 1873 reissue of Baird, S.F. 1864–1866. Review of North American Birds, in the museum of the Smith-
sonian Institution.
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
DAVID ET AL.16 · Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press
Collar, N.J. (1997) Family Psittacidae. In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal, J. (Eds.) Handbook of the birds of the
world, vol. 4. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, 280–477.
Conover, H.B. (1945) A new race of Penelope argyrotis from Colombia. Proceedings of the Biological Society of
Washington, 58, 125–126. [mesaeus].
Cory, C.B. (1918) Catalogue of the birds of the Americas. Field Museum of Natural History, Zoology, 13, Part 2, No. 1,
1–315.
Cory, C. B. (1919) Catalogue of the birds of the Americas. Field Museum of Natural History, Zoology, 13, Part 2, No.2,
316–607.
Coues, E.B. (1880) Third instalment of American ornithological bibliography. Bulletin of the United States Geological &
Geographical Survey of the Territories, 5 (4), 521–1072.
Cramp, S., Brooks, D.J., Dunn, E., Gillmor, R., Hall-Craggs, J., Hollom, P.A.D., Nicholson, E.M., Ogilvie, M.A.,
Roselaar, C.S., Sellar, P.J., Simmons, K.E.L., Voous, K.H., Wallace, D.I.M. & Wilson, M.G. (Eds.) (1988) Handbook
of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa; the birds of the western Palearctic. Oxford University
Press, Oxford, 5, 1063 pp.
Daudin, F. M. (1800) Traité élémentaire et complet d'ornithologie, ou histoire naturelle des oiseaux. Vol. 1. Daudin &
Duprat, Paris, viii, 474 pp. [naevia].
David, N. & Gosselin, M. (2002a) Gender agreement of avian species names. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’
Club, 122, 14–49.
David, N. & Gosselin, M. (2002b) The grammatical gender of avian genera. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club,
122, 257–282.
Deignan, H.G. (1964a) Subfamily Panurinae. In: Mayr, E. & Paynter, R.A., Jr. (Eds.) Check-list of birds of the world. A
continuation of the work of James L. Peters, vol. 10. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Mass.,
430–442.
Deignan, H.G. (1964b) Subfamily Timaliinae. In: Mayr, E. & Paynter, R.A., Jr. (Eds.) Check-list of birds of the world. A
continuation of the work of James L. Peters, vol. 10. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Mass.,
240–427.
De Juana, E., Suarez, F. & Ryan, P.G. (2004). Family Alaudidae. In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott A. & Sargatal, J. (Eds.).
Handbook of the birds of the world, vol. 4. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, 496–601.
Des Murs, O. (1849) Iconographie ornithologique. Nouveau recueil général des planches peintes d’oiseaux pour servir
de suite et de complément aux planches enluminées de Buffon… et aux planches coloriées de MM Temminck et
Laugier de Chartrouse, mêmes formats, accompagné d'un texte raisonné. critique et descriptif. Paris, Livr. 12. Paris.
[unnumbered, by instruction hand numbered to pp. 292–310].
Dickinson, E.C. (2001) Systematic notes on Asian birds. 9. The “Nouveau recueil de planches coloriées” of Temminck &
Laugier (1820–1839). Zoologische Verhandelingen, Leiden, 335, 7–54.
Dickinson, E.C. (Ed.) (2003) The Howard & Moore complete checklist of the birds of the world. 3rd Edition. Christopher
Helm, London, 1039 pp.16
Dickinson, E.C. & Pittie, A. (2006) Systematic notes on Asian birds. 51. Dates of avian names introduced in early
volumes of the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. Zoologische Mededelingen, Leiden, 80–5, 113–124.
Dillon, S. & Fjeldså, J. (2005) The implications of different species concepts for describing biodiversity patterns and
assessing conservation needs for African birds. Ecography, 28, 682–692.
Duncan, F.M. (1937) On the dates of publication of the Society’s “Proceedings”, 1859–1926. Proceedings of the
Zoological Society of London, [105], 71–83.
Forshaw, J.M. (2006) Parrots of the world: an identification guide. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey,
xii, 172 pp.
Fry, C. H. (1988) Family Coraciidae: Rollers. In: Fry, C.H., S. Keith & E.K. Urban. The Birds of Africa, vol. 3. Academic
Press, London, 338–355.
Fry, C. H. (2001) Family Coraciidae. In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal, J. (Eds.) Handbook of the birds of the world,
vol. 6. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, 342–376.
Gill, T. (1899) The generic names Pediocaetes and Poocaetes. The Auk, 16, 20–23.
Gould, J. (1838a) (April) A synopsis of the birds of Australia and the adjacent islands. Author, London, pt. 4,
unpaginated. [Acanthagenys, Erythrogonys].
Gould, J. (1838b) (December)17 Characters of a large number of new species of Australian birds. Proceedings of the
Zoological Society of London, [5], 138–157 (1837).
Gould, J. (1875) A monograph of the Trogonidae, or family of Trogons. 2nd Ed. London, pt. 4. [behni]
A U.S. edition with identical pagination published by Princeton University Press.
See Duncan (1937).
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press · 17
A LIST OF FIRST REVISER ACTIONS: ORNITHOLOGY
Gray, G.R. (1840) A list of the genera of birds with an indication of the typical species of each genus. R. & J.E. Taylor,
London, viii, 80 pp.
Gray, G.R. (1841) A list of the genera of birds, with their synonyma and an indication of the typical species of each
genus. R. & J. Taylor, London, xii, 115 pp.
Gray, G.R. (1847)18. Megapodidae. In: The genera of birds: comprising their generic characters, a notice of the habits of
each genus, and an extensive list of species referred to their several genera. Longman, Brown, Green & Longmans,
London, [488–493] [forsteni]
Gray, G.R. (1855) Catalogue of the genera and subgenera of birds contained in the British Museum. Trustees of the
British Museum, London, 192 pp.
Gray, G.R. (1861)19 List of birds collected by Mr. Wallace at the Molucca Islands, with decriptions of new species, etc.
Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, [28], 341–366.
Gray, G.R. (1862) List of birds composing the family Megapodiidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London,
[29], 280–296 (1861).
Greenway, J.C., Jr. (1968) Family Drepanididae. In: R. A. Paynter, Jr. (Ed.) Check-list of birds of the world. A
continuation of the work of James L. Peters, vol. 14. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
93–103.
Hargitt, E. (1890) Catalogue of Birds in the British Museum. Vol . 1 8. Catalogue of the Picariae in the collection of the
British Museum. Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), London, xv, 597 pp.
Hartert, E. (1900) Trochilidae. Das Tierreich, 9, 254 pp.
Hartert, E. (1904) Die Vögel des paläarktischen Fauna. Vol. 1(1). R. Friedlander & Sohn, Berlin: 113–240.
Hartert, E. (1907) Die Vögel des paläarktischen Fauna. Vol 1(4). R. Friedlander & Sohn, Berlin: 385–512.
Hartlaub. G. (1885) On a new species of parrot of the genus Psittacula. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London,
[53] 613–615. [spengeli].
Hekstra, G. P. (1982) Description of twenty-four new subspecies of American owls (Aves, Strigidae). Bulletin zoologisch
Museum Universiteit van Amsterdam, 9 (7), 49–63. [uruguaii].
Hellmayr, C.E. (1903) Paridae, Sittidae und Certhiidae. Das Tierreich, 18, xxxi, 255 pp.
Hellmayr, C.E. (1935) Catalogue of birds of the Americas and the adjacent islands in the Field Museum of Natural
History. Field Museum of Natural History, Zoology, 13 (8), vi, 541 pp.
Hellmayr, C.E. & Conover, H.B. (1948) Catalogue of birds of the Americas and the adjacent islands in the Field Museum
of Natural History. Field Museum of Natural History, Zoology, 13 (1) (2), vii, 434 pp.
Hodgson, B.H. (1841) Notice of a new form of the Glaucopinae, or rasorial crows, inhabiting the northern region of
Nepal. Conostoma Æmodius, (Nobis type). Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 10 (119), 856–857.
[Conostoma, aemodius].
Hodgson, B.H. (1844) Catalogue of Nipalese Birds collected between 1824 and 1844. [J.E. Gray’s] Zoological
Miscellany: 81–86.
Holthuis, L.B. & Sakai, T. (1970) Ph. F. von Siebold and Fauna Japonica. A history of early Japanese Zoology.
Academic Press of Japan, Tokyo, 323 pp.
Inskipp, T., Lindsey, N. & Duckworth, W. (1996) An annotated checklist of the birds of the Oriental Region. Oriental
Bird Club, Sandy, 294 pp.
ICZN [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1956) Opinion 404. Validation under the Plenary
Powers of Pyrrhocorax [Tunstall], 1771, as the generic name for the chough (Class Aves). Opinions & Declarations
rendered by the International Commission on zoological Nomenclature, 13 (5), 87–106.
ICZN [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1964) International code of zoological nomenclature.
2nd. edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, xix, 176 pp.
ICZN [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1985) International code of zoological nomenclature.
3rd edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, xx, 338 pp.
ICZN [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature.
4th. edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, xxix, 306 pp.
Iredale, T. (1948) A check list of birds of paradise and bower-birds. Australian Zoologist, 11, 161–189.
Jardine, W. & Selby, P.J. (1835) Illustrations of ornithology. Lizars, Edinburgh, part 10, pl.136, 139–151 with texts and
index to Vol. III (parts 7–10). [Macronus].
Jobling, J.A. (1991) A dictionary of scientific bird names. Oxford University Press, Oxford, xxix, 272 pp.
Johnsgard, P.A. (1979) Order Anseriformes. In: Mayr, E. & Cottrell, G. W. (Ed s.) Check-list of birds of the world,
revision of the work of James L. Peters. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1 (2nd ed.),
425–506.
Dated from text. Pages post-numbered. This section bound in Vol. 3.
‘Issued between August 1860 and March 1861’ (Duncan, 1937).
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
DAVID ET AL.18 · Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press
Keith, S., Urban, E.K. & Fry, C.H. (1992) The birds of Africa. Academic Press, London, 4, xiv, 609 pp.
Kloss, C.B. (1918) On birds recently collected in Siam. Cont. The Ibis, (10) 6, 189–234. [connectens].
Kuhl, H. (1820) Conspectus psittacorum. Cum specierum definitionibus, novarum descriptionibus, synonymis et circa
patriam singularum naturalem adversariis, adjecto indice museorum, ubi earum artificiosae exuviae servantur. Nova
Acta physico-medica Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae Naturae Curiosorum, 2, 1–104. [swindernianus].
Kuroda, N. (1934) Notes on Fauna Japonica Aves. In: Fauna Japonica: Aves (Japanese Edition). Tokyo, 1–23.
Lafresnaye. F. (1845) Sur le genre Picumne, de Temminck, pl. coloriées. Revue zoologique, 8, 1–10. [buffonii].
Lafresnaye, F. (1849) [Description of Xyphorhynchus pucheranii]. In: Des Murs, O., Iconographie ornithologique.
Nouveau recueil général des planches peintes d'oiseaux pour servir de suite et de complément aux planches
enluminées de Buffon… et aux planches coloriées de MM Temminck et Laugier de Chartrouse, mêmes formats,
accompagné d'un texte raisonné. critique et descriptif. Paris, Livr. 12. [unnumbered, by instruction hand numbered
to pp. 292–310]. [pucheranii].
Lafresnaye, F. (1850) Essai d’une monographie du genre Picucule (Buffon), Dendrocolaptes (Hermann, Illiger), devenu
aujourd’hui la sous-famille Dendrocolaptinae (Gray, Genera of Birds) de la famille Certhiadae de Swains. Revue et
Magasin de Zoologie, (2) 2, 369–388.
Latham, J. (1790). Index ornithologicus, sive systema ornithologiæ; complectens avium divisionem in classes, ordines,
genera, species, ipsarumque varietates: adjectis synonymis, locis, descriptionibus, & c, vol. 1. Leigh & Sotheby,
London, xviii, 500 pp. [erythrorhynchos].
LeCroy, M. (1983) The spelling of Semioptera wallacii (Paradisaeidae). Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club, 103,
144–145.
Lembeye, J. (1850) Aves de la Isla de Cuba. Habana, 136 pp. [iradii].
Lesson, R.P. (1830) Traité d’ornithologie ou Tableaux méthodiques des ordres, sous-ordres, familles, tribus, genres,
sous-genres et races d’oiseaux. Vol. 1, livr. 3. Levrault, Paris, 161–240. [Guaruba].
Lesson, R.P. (1831) Traité d’ornithologie ou Tableaux méthodiques des ordres, sous-ordres, familles, tribus, genres,
sous-genres et races d’oiseaux, vol. 1, livr. 8. Levrault, Paris, 561–659.
Lesson, R.P. (1843) (Jan.) Index ornithologique. Suite. L’Echo du Monde Savant [1er semestre] col. 13–15.
[Icthyophaga].
Li Gui-yuan (1995) A new subspecies of Certhia familiaris (Passeriformes: Certhiidae). Acta zootaxonomica sinica, 20
(3), 373–376. [tianquanensis]
Linnaeus, C. (1758) Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum
characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima. Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae, 1, 824 pp. [Paradisea,
Rynchops]
Linnaeus, C. (1766) Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum
characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio duodecima. L. Salvius, Holmiae, 1, pars 1, 532 pp.
Linnaeus, C. (1767) Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum
characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio duodecima. L. Salvius, Holmiae, 1, pars 2, 533–1327 etc.
(Nomina generica – unpaginated – follows p. 1327).
Linnaeus, C. (1768) Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum
characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio duodecima. L. Salvius, Holmiae, 3, 1–236 etc. [Index
Universalis – unpaginated – follows p. 236].
Loche, [Capt. V.] (1860) Description de deux nouvelles especes d'Alouettes decouvertes dans le Sahara algerien par le
commandant Loche. Revue et Magasin de Zoologie, (2) 12 (Avril), 148–151. [randonii].
Loche, V. (1867) Histoire naturelle des oiseaux de l’Algérie. In: Exploration scientifique de l’Algérie pendant les années
1840–1841–1842. Arthus Bertrand, Paris, 2, 3–444.
Lowery, G.H., Jr. & Monroe, B.L. (1968) Family Parulidae. In: Paynter, R.A. Jr. (Ed.) Check-list of birds of the world. A
continuation of the work of James L. Peters. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 14,
3–93.
Martens, J. (2006) In: Martens, J. &Tietze, J. Systematic notes on Asian birds. 65. A preliminary review of the
Certhiidae. Zoologische Mededelingen, Leiden, 80 (5), 273–286.
Mathews, G.M. (1913) The birds of Australia. Vol. 3, part 1. Witherby, London, 1–116.
Mathews, G.M. (1917) The birds of Australia. Vol. 6, part 2. Witherby, London, 105–216.
Mathews, G.M. (1921) The birds of Australia. Vol. 9, part 4. Witherby, London, 153–194.
Mathews, G.M. (1925) The birds of Australia. Vol. 12, part 2. Witherby, London, 49–88.
Mayr, E. (1962) Family Paradisaeidae. In: Mayr, E. & Greenway, J.C., Jr. (Eds.), Check-list of birds of the world. A
continuation of the work of James L. Peters. Vol. 15. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
181–204.
Mayr, E. (1979) Family Dromaiidae. In: Mayr, E. & Cottrell, G.W. (Eds.) Check-list of birds of the world. A revision of
the work of James L. Peters. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 9–10.
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press · 19
A LIST OF FIRST REVISER ACTIONS: ORNITHOLOGY
Mayr, E. (1986) Family Acanthizidae. In: Mayr, E. & Cottrell, G.W. (Eds.) Check-list of birds of the world. A
continuation of the work of James L. Peters. Vol. 11. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
409–464.
Mayr, E. & Greenway, J.C., Jr. (Eds.) (1960) Check-list of Birds of the World. A continuation of the work of James L.
Peters. Vol. 9. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, xii, 506 pp.
McAlpine, D.K. (1979) The correct name and authorship for Wallace’s Standard Wing (Passeriformes, Paradiseidae).
Bulletin of the British Ornithologists’ Club, 99, 108–110.
Melville, R.V. (1977) Dromaius Vieillot, 1816 (Aves): closure of case ZN(S) 1688. Bulletin of zoological Nomenclature,
34, 12–13.
Meyen, F.J.F. (1834) Beiträge zur Zoologie, gesammelt auf einer Reise um die Erde. 4. Vögel. Nova Acta physico-
medica Academia Caesarea Leopoldino-Carolinae Germanicum Naturae Curiosum, 16 (Suppl.), 59–12420.
[luteiventris]
Meyer, A.B. (1882) On Ninox rudolfi, a new species of Hawk-Owl from the Malay Archipelago. The Ibis, (4) 6,
232–234. [rudolfi].
Meyer, A.B. (1892) The birds of Sumba. Notes from the Leyden Museum, 14 (3-4), 265–268.
Miranda-Ribeiro, A. (1920) Revisao dos psittacideos brasileiros. Revista do Museo Paulista, 12 (2), 1–82.
[Propyrrhura].
Molina, G.I. (1782) Saggio sulla storia naturale del Chili. Author, Bologna, 367 pp. [melancorypha].
Morioka, H., Dickinson, E.C., Hiraoka, T., Allen D. & Yamasaki, T. (2005) Types of Japanese birds. National Science
Museum Monographs (Tokyo), 28, 154 pp.
Neave, S.A. (ed.) (1939-40) A list of the names of genera and subgenera from the tenth edition of Linnaeus, 1758, to the
end of 1935. 4 volumes. Zoological Society of London.
Niethammer, G. (1955) Zur Vogelwelt des Ennedi-Gebirges (Französisch Äquatorial-Afrika). Bonner zoologische
Beiträge, 6 (1-2), 29–80. [kollmannspergeri].
Oberholser, H.C. (1974) The bird life of Texas. University of Texas Press, Austin & London, 2, 531–1069. [neoborea].
Olrog, C. C. (1973) Notas ornitologicas. IX. Sobre la coleccion del Instituto Miguel Lillo de Tucuman. Acta zoologica
Lilloana, 30, 7–11. [blakei].
Olrog, C. (1979) Nueva lista de la avifauna argentina. Opera Lilloana, 27, 1–324.
Olson, S.L. & James, H.F. (1986) The holotype of the Laysan Finch Telespiza cantans Wilson (Drepanidini). Bulletin of
the British Ornithologists’ Club, 106, 84–86.
Paynter, R.A., Jr. (1970) Subfamily Emberizinae. In: Paynter, R. A.. Jr. (Ed.) Check-list of birds of the world. A
continuation of the work of James L. Peters. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 13,
3–214.
Peters, J.L. (1931) Check-list of birds of the world. Vol. 1. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, xviii,
345 pp.
Peters, J.L. (1934) Check-list of birds of the world. Vol. 2. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts,, xvii,
401 pp.
Peters, J.L. (1937) Check-list of birds of the world. Vol. 3. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, xiii, 311
pp.
Peters, J.L. (1940) Check-list of birds of the world. Vol. 4. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, xii, 291
pp.
Peters, J.L. (1945) Check-list of birds of the world. Vol. 5. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, xi, 306
pp.
Peters, J.L. (1948) Check-list of birds of the world. Vol. 6. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, xi, 259
pp.
Peters, J.L. (1951) Check-list of birds of the world. Vol. 7. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge,
Massachusetts,, x, 318 pp.
Peters, J.L. (1960a) Family Alaudidae. In: Mayr, E. & Greenway, J.C., Jr. (Eds.) Check-list of birds of the world. A
continuation of the work of James L. Peters. Vol. 9. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
3–80.
Peters, J.L. (1960b) Family Hirundinidae. In: Mayr, E. & Greenway, J.C., Jr. (Eds.) Check-list of birds of the world. A
continuation of the work of James L. Peters. Vol. 9. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
80–129.
Pieters, F.F.J.M. & Dickinson, E.C. (2005) The specified dates of publication of the full run of Nederlandsch Tijdschrift
voor de Dierkunde volumes 1–5 (1863–1884). Archives of Natural History, 32 (1), 107–109.
Often cited from volume 3 of Meyen’s Reise um die Erde; the pagination in that is identical, but in the journal the
signatures are shown to be for “Vol. XVI Suppl.”. We think the journal appeared first.
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
DAVID ET AL.20 · Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press
Pinto, O.M. de O. (1938) Catalogo das aves do Brasil. Parte 1. Revista do Museu Paulista, 22, 566 pp.
Polaszek, A., Agosti, D., Alonso-Zarazaga, M., Beccaloni, G., Bjørn, P.d.P., Bouchet, P., Brothers, D.J., Cranbrook, G.,
Evenhuis, N.L., Godfray, H.C.J., Johnson, N.F., Krell, F.-T., Lipscomb, D., Lyal, C.H.C., Mace, G.M., Mawatari, S.,
Miller, S.E., Minelli, A., Morris, S., Ng, P.K.L., Patterson, D.J., Pyle, R.L., Robinson, N.J., Rogo, L., Taverne, J.,
Thompson, F.C., Tol, J. van, Wheeler, Q.D. & Wilson, E.O. (2005). A universal register for animal names. Nature,
437, 4.
Potapov, R.L. (1993) New subspecies of the Himalayan Snowcock, Tetraogallus himalayensis sauricus, subsp. nova.
Russian Journal of Ornithology, 2 (1), 3–5. [sauricus].
Potapov, R.L. (2007) On the name of a new subspecies of the Himalayan Snowcock Tetraogallus himalayensis sauricus
Potapov, 1993. Russian Journal of Ornithology, 16, 654–655.
Potts, T.H. (1872) (Jan.) Notes and descriptions of some birds lately added to the Museum, Canterbury New Zealand.
The Ibis, 35–39. [haastii].
Potts, T. H. (1872, May [imprint: 1871]). Notes on a new species of Apteryx. (A. haastii, Potts). Transactions of the New
Zealand Institute, 4, 204–205.
Ramsay, E.P. (1878) On two new species of Gerygone. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 3,
116–118. [insularis].
Ramsay, E.P. (1879) Notes on some recently described birds from the Solomon Islands. Proceedings of the Linnean
Society of New South Wales, 4, 313–319.
Rand, A.L. (1960) African taxa. In: Rand, A.L. & Deignan, H.G., Family Pycnonotidae. In: Mayr, E. & Greenway, J.C.,
Jr. (Eds.) Check-list of birds of the world. A continuation of the work of James L. Peters. Vol. 9. Museum of
Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 221–300.
Reichenbach, H.G.L. (1853) Das Natürliche System der Vögel. Handbuch der speciellen Ornithologie. Dresden, lief 3,
i–viii, 1–36, I–XXXI. [Ajaia].
Richmond, C.W. (1917) Generic names applied to birds during the years 1906 to 1915, inclusive, with additions and
corrections to Waterhouse’s “Index Generum Avium.” Proceedings of the United States national Museum, 53,
565–636.
Ridgway, R. (1907) The birds of North and Middle America. Part IV. Bulletin of the United States national Museum, 50,
xxii, 973 pp.
Ripley, S.D. (1982) A synopsis of the birds of India and Pakistan (2nd edition). Bombay Natural History Society, Bombay,
xxvi, 652 pp.
Roberts, A. (1936) Report upon a survey of the higher vertebrates of north-eastern Zululand under Union research grants,
and on behalf of the Transvaal Museum, during October, November and December, 1928 and 1929, and July, August
and September, 1933. Annals of the Transvaal Museum, 18 (3), 163–251. [lebombo].
Robinson, H.C. & Kloss, C.B. (1918) On a collection of birds from the province of Puket, peninsular Siam. Journal of
the Natural History Society of Siam, 3 (2), 87–119.
Salomonsen, F. (1967) Family Dicaeidae. In: Paynter, R.A., Jr. (Ed.), Check-list of birds of the world. A continuation of
the work of James L. Peters. Vol. 12. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 66–208.
Salvin, O. (1863) Description of thirteen new species of birds discovered in Central America by Fredrick Godman and
Osbert Salvin. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, [31], 186–192. [sancti-hieronymi].
Salvin, O. (1866) A further contribution to the ornithology of Guatemala. The Ibis, (2) 2, 188–206.
Saunders, H. (1896) Gaviae (terns, gulls, and skuas). In: Saunders, H. & Salvin, O., A catalogue of the birds in the British
Museum. Vol. 25. Catalogue of the Gaviæ and Tubinares in the collection of the British Museum. Trustees of the
British Museum (natural History), London, 1–339.
Schlegel, H. (1871)21. Observations Zoologiques V. Nederlandsch Tijdschrift voor de Dierkunde, 4, 33–61. [Psitacella].
Schlegel, H. (1874) Revue de la collection des perroquets (Psittaci) faisant partie du musée des Pays-Bas. Muséum
d’Histoire naturelle des Pays-Bas, Revue Méthodique et critique des collections déposées dans cet établissement.
E.J. Brill, Leiden, Monographie 38: 1–84.
Schodde, R. (2008) The name Stipiturus malachurus polionotum (Southern Emu-wren) — fixing of spelling. Bulletin of
the British Ornithologists’ Club, 128, 71.
Schodde, R., & Mason, I.J. (1999) Directory of Australian birds. Passerines. CSIRO publishing, Canberra, ix, 851 pp.
[polionotum].
Sclater, P.L. (1863) On a new spine-tailed swift from Western Africa. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London,
[31], 205. [cassini].
Sclater, P.L. (1866) Notes on the genera and species of Cypselidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London,
[33], 593–617 (1865).
Selby, J.P. (1836) natural history of parrots. Lizars, Edinburgh, xv, 187 pp.
For confirmation of the date of this see Pieters & Dickinson (2005).
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press · 21
A LIST OF FIRST REVISER ACTIONS: ORNITHOLOGY
Sharpe, R.B. (1877) On the birds collected by Professor J. B. Steere in the Philippine Archipelago. Transactions of the
Linnean Society, London, (2) 1 (6), 307–355. [winchelli].
Sharpe, R.B. (1879) Contributions to the ornithology of Borneo. Pt. IV. On the birds of the Province of Lumbidan, north-
western Borneo. The Ibis, (4) 3, 233–272. [Haematortyx].
Sharpe, R.B. (1892) Catalogue of the birds in the British Museum. Vol. 17. Catalogue of the Picariæ in the collection of
the British Museum. The Trustees of the British Museum, London., xi, 522 pp.
Sharpe, R.B. (1899) A hand list of the genera and species of birds. Vol. 1. London, xxi, 303 pp.
Sharpe, R.B. (1900) A hand list of the genera and species of birds. Vol. 2. London, xv, 312 pp.
Sherborn, C.D. & Woodward, B.B. (1901). Notes on the dates of publication of the natural history portions of some
French voyages. Part 1. ‘Amerique méridionale’; ‘Indes orientales’; ‘Pôle Sud’ (‘Astrolabe’ and ‘Zélée’); ‘La
Bonite’; ‘La Coquille’ and ‘L'Uranie et Physicienne’. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (7) 7, 388–392.
Sick, H. (1990) Notes on the taxonomy of Brazilian parrots. Ararajuba, 1, 111–112.
Sick, H. (1993) Birds in Brazil. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, xvii, 703 pp.
Simon, E.L. (1897) Catalogue des espèces actuellement connues de la famille des Trochilidés. Paris, 46 pp.
[Stephanoxis].
Simon, E.L. (1921) Histoire naturelle des Trochilidae (Synopsis et catalogue). Encyclopédie Roret, Paris, vi, 416 pp.
Smith, A. (1847a) (Oct.) Illustrations of the Zoology of South Africa. Part XXV. Smith, Elder & Co., London.
[fasciolata].
Smith, A. (1847b) (Dec.) Illustrations of the Zoology of South Africa. Part XXVI. Smith, Elder & Co., London.
[mariquensis].
Steinbacher, J. (1954) Die Typen der Vogelsammlung von F.H. von Kittlitz. Senckenbergiana, 34 (4/6), 301–305.
Stone, W. (1919) Editions of Baird, Cassin and Lawrence’s ‘Birds of North America’. The Auk, 36 (3), 428–430.
Stresemann, E. (1914) Die Vögel von Seran (Ceram). Novitates Zoologicae, 21, 25–153.
Stresemann, E. (1953) Vögel, gesammelt von Labilliardière während der ‘Voyage à la recherche de la Pérouse’
1791–1794. Mitteilungen des zoologischen Museums Berlin, 29 (1), 75–106.
Stresemann, E. & Amadon, D. (1979). Order Falconiformes. In: Mayr, E. & Cottrell, G. W. (Eds.), Check-list of birds of
the world. A revision of the work of James L. Peters. (2nd ed.). Vol. 1. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge,
Massachusetts, 271–425.
Swainson, W. (1837a) Birds of West Africa. Vol. 1. W.H. Lizars, Edinburgh, 286 pp. [Pyrenestes, olivaceus].
Swainson, W. (1837b) On the natural history and classification of birds. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green &
Longman, London, 2, vii, 398 pp. [Bradypterus].
Swainson, W. (1838) Flycatchers. W.H. Lizars, Edinburgh, 256 pp. (Vol. 21 of The Naturalist’s Library). [Myadestes].
Swinhoe, R. (1873) On a new species of Little Bittern from China. The Ibis, (3) 3, 73–74. [eurhythma].
Swinhoe, R. (1875) Ornithological notes made made at Chefoo (Province of Shantung, North China). The Ibis, (3) 5,
114–140.
Temminck, C.J. & Schlegel, H. (1848) (27 Nov.) Fauna Japonica. Aves. Fasc. 8. A. Arnz et Socios, Lugduni Batavorum,
93?–100 pp. [sulphurata].
Temminck, C.J. & Schlegel, H. (1850) (10 Apr.) Fauna Japonica. Aves. Fasc. 12. A. Arnz et Socios, Lugduni
Batavorum, 125–141.
Traylor, M.A., Jr. (1979) Subfamily Elaeniinae. In: Traylor, M.A. Jr. (Ed.), Check-list of birds of the world. A
continuation of the work of James L. Peters. Vol. 8. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
3–112.
Traylor, M.A., Jr. (1986) African taxa. In: Watson, G.E., M.A. Traylor, Jr. & E. Mayr, Family Sylviidae, Old World
Warblers. In: Mayr, E. & Cottrell, G.W. (Eds.), Check-list of birds of the world. A continuation of the work of James
L. Peters. Vol. 11. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 3–294.
Vaurie. C. (1959) The birds of the Palearctic Fauna. Order Passeriformes. H.F. & G. Witherby Ltd., London, xii, 762 pp.
Vaurie. C. (1966) Systematic notes on the bird family Cracidae. No. 6. Reviews of nine species of Penelope. American
Museum Novitates, 2251, 1–30.
Vieillot, L.P. (1816a) Analyse d’une nouvelle ornithologie élémentaire. Deterville, Paris, i–iv, 1–70. [Acridotheres,
Asturina, Dromaius, Eudyptes, Sphecotheres, Thamnophilus, Thryothorus].
Vieillot, L. (1816b) Asturine, Asturina. In: Virey, J.J. (Ed.), Nouveau Dictionnaire d’Histoire naturelle, 3 (ASI-BOE),
41–42.
Vieillot, L. (1816c) Batara, Thamnophilus. In: Virey, J.J. (Ed.), Nouveau Dictionnaire d’Histoire naturelle, 3 (ASI-BOE),
308–319.
Vieillot, L. (1816d) Émou, Dromaius. In: Virey, J.J. (Ed.), Nouveau Dictionnaire d’Histoire naturelle, 10 (EAL-EZE),
211–213.
Vieillot, L. (1818) Gorfou, Eudyptes. In: Virey, J.J. (Ed.), Nouveau Dictionnaire d’Histoire naturelle, 13 (GEN-GUE),
305–309.
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
DAVID ET AL.22 · Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press
Vieillot, L. (1819a) Martin, Acridotheres. In: Virey, J.J. (Ed.), Nouveau Dictionnaire d’Histoire naturelle, 19 (MAM-
MED), 389–393.
Vieillot, L. (1819b) Sphécothère, Sphecothera. In: Virey, J.J. (Ed.), Nouveau Dictionnaire d’Histoire naturelle, 32 (SPH-
TAZ), 5.
Vieillot, L. (1819c) Thryothore, Thryothorus. In: Virey, J.J. (Ed.), Nouveau Dictionnaire d’Histoire naturelle, 34 (THE-
TSU), 55–61.
Von Kittlitz, F.H. (1835) Über einige noch unbeschriebene Vögel von der Insel Luzon, den Carolinen und den Marianen.
Mémoires des Savants étrangers de l’Académie impériale des Sciences de St. Petersbourg, 2, 1–10. [pygmaea].
Von Kittlitz, F.H. (1858) Denkwürdigkeiten einer Reise nach dem russichen Amerika, nach Mikronesien und durch
Kamtschatka. Fustus Berthes, Gotha, 2, ii, 463 pp.
Von Pelzeln, A. (1868) Zur Ornithologie Brasiliens: Resultate von Johann Natterer’s Reisen in den Jahren 1817 bis
1835. A. Pichler's Witwe & Sohn, Wien, Abth. 1, 1–68. [commersoni].
Von Pelzeln, A. (1870) Zur Ornithologie Brasiliens: Resultate von Johann Natterer's Reisen in den Jahren 1817 bis
1835. A. Pichler’s Witwe & Sohn, Wien, Abth. 3, 189–390.
Von Zedlitz, O. (1911) Revision des Genus Camaroptera. Journal fur Ornithologie, 59, 328–345. [rothschildi].
Wagler, J. (1832) Monographia Psittacorum. Abhandlungen der Mathematische-Physikalischen Classe der Königlich-
Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1 (13), 463–750. [Licmetis].
Wilson, A. (1811) American Ornithology. Bradford and Inskeep, Philadelphia, 3, xvi, 120 pp. [mississippiensis].
Wilson, A. (1812) American Ornithology. Bradford and Inskeep, Philadelphia, 6, xx, 102 pp.
Wilson, S.B. (1890) On a new finch from Midway island, North Pacific. The Ibis, (6) 2, 339–341. [Telespiza].
Wilson, S.B. & Evans, A.H. (1899) Aves Hawaiienses. The birds of the Sandwich Islands. London, part 8: table of
contents, list of plates and index, 251–257.
Wolters, H.E. (1975) Die Vögelarten der Erde. Paul Parey, Hamburg and Berlin, Lieferung 1, 1–80.
Wolters, H.E. (1976) Die Vögelarten der Erde. Paul Parey, Hamburg and Berlin, Lieferung 2, 81–160.
Wolters, H.E. (1977) Die Vögelarten der Erde. Paul Parey, Hamburg and Berlin, Lieferung 3, 161–240.
Wolters, H.E. (1979) Die Vögelarten der Erde. Paul Parey, Hamburg and Berlin, Lieferung 4, 241–320.
Wolters, H.E. (1980) Die Vögelarten der Erde. Paul Parey, Hamburg and Berlin, Lieferung 5, 321–400.
Wolters, H.E. (1982) Die Vögelarten der Erde. Paul Parey, Hamburg and Berlin, Lieferung 7, 453–748.
Zimmer, J.T. (1926) Catalogue of the Edward E. Ayer Ornithological Library. Field Museum Natural History, Zoology,
16 (1): i–x, 1–364.
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press · 23
A LIST OF FIRST REVISER ACTIONS: ORNITHOLOGY
Appendix 1
Correct original spellings of generic names as determined under arts. 24.2.3., and 24.2.4 (ICZN 1999). Author
and date citations as in the References. Numbers in parentheses refer to consecutive numbers in text headings.
Acanthagenys Gould, 1838a (1)
Acridotheres Vieillot, 1816a (2)
Ajaia Reichenbach, 1853 (67)
Asturina Vieillot, 1816a (3)
Bradypterus Swainson, 1837b (46)
Callichelidon Baird, 1865c (4)
Chelidorhynx Blyth, 1843 (5)
Conostoma Hodgson, 1841 (6)
Dromaius Vieillot, 1816a (7)
Erythrogonys Gould, 1838a (8)
Eudyptes Vieillot, 1816a (9)
Guaruba Lesson, 1830 (10)
Haematortyx Sharpe, 1879 (11)
Icthyophaga Lesson, 1843 (47)
Licmetis Wagler, 1832 (48)
Macronus Jardine & Selby, 1835 (49)
Myadestes Swainson, 1838 (50)
Nephoecetes Baird, 1858 (12)
Oreoscoptes Baird, 1858 (13)
Paradisea Linnaeus, 1758 (14)
Pedioecetes Baird, 1858 (15)
Pooecetes Baird, 1858 (16)
Propyrrhura Miranda-Ribeiro, 1920 (51)
Psittacella Schlegel, 1871 (58)
Pyrenestes Swainson, 1837a (17)
Rynchops Linnaeus, 1758 (18)
Sphecotheres Vieillot, 1816a (52)
Stephanoxis Simon, 1897 (68)
Telespiza Wilson, 1890 (19)
Thamnophilus Vieillot, 1816a (20)
Thryothorus Vieillot, 1816a (21)
Xiphorhamphus Blyth, 1843 (22)
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
DAVID ET AL.24 · Zootaxa 2085 © 2009 Magnolia Press
Appendix 2
Correct original spellings of species-group names as determined under Art. 24.2.3, and 24.2.4 (ICZN 1999).
Author and date citations as in the References. Numbers in parentheses refer to consecutive numbers in text
headings.
aemodium Hodgson, 1841 [Conostoma] (53)
aurantiithorax Beresford, Fjeldså & Kiure, 2004 [Sheppardia] (23)
behni Gould, 1875 [Trogon] (59)
blakei Olrog, 1973 [Catharus dryas] (24)
buffonii Lafresnaye, 1845 [Picumnus] (69)
cassini Sclater, 1863 [Chaetura] (25)
commersoni von Pelzeln, 1868 [Furnarius] (26)
connectens Kloss, 1918 [Mixornis rubricapilla] (27)
erythrorhynchos Latham, 1790 [Certhia] (70)
eurhythmus Swinhoe, 1873 [Ardetta] (28)
fasciolatus Smith, 1847 [Drymoica] (54)
forsteni G. R. Gray, 1847 [Megapodius] (29)
francescae Baird, 1865b [Granatellus] (71)
gundlachi Baird, 1865a [Dendroica] (30)
haastii Potts, 1872 [Apteryx] (31)
insularis Ramsay, 1878 [Gerygone] (32)
iradii Lembeye, 1850 [Cypselus] (60)
kollmannspergeri Niethammer, 1955 [Ammomanes deserti] (72)
lebombo Roberts, 1936 [Dryodromas fulvicapilla] (55)
luteiventris Meyen, 1834 [Fringilla] (61)
maranonicum Carriker, 1933 [Camptostoma obsoletum] (62)
mariquensis Smith, 1847b [Bradornis] (63)
mccalli Baird, 1858 [Ortalis] (33)
melancoryphus Molina, 1782 [Anas] (56)
mesaea Conover, 1945 [Penelope] (73)
mississippiensis Wilson, 1811 [Falco] (34)
naevius Daudin, 1800 [Coracias] (75)
neoborea Oberholser, 1974 [Anas platyrhynchos] (74)
olivaceus Swainson, 1837a [Trichophorus] (35)
polionotum Schodde & Mason (1999) [Stipiturus malachurus] (36)
pucheranii Des Murs, 1849 [Xyphorhynchus] (37)
pygmaeum von Kittlitz, 1835 [Nectarinia] (38)
randonii Loche, 1862 [Galerida] (39)
rudolfi Meyer, 1882 [Ninox] (40)
sanctihieronymi Salvin, 1863 [Panyptila] (41)
sauricus Potapov, 1993 [Tetraogallus himalayensis] (42)
spengeli Hartlaub, 1885 [Psittacula] (64)
sulphurata Temminck & Schlegel, 1848 [Emberiza] (43)
superciliaris von Zedlitz, 1911 [Camaroptera] (76)
swainsoni Baird, 1858 [Vireo] (44)
swindernianus Kuhl, 1820 [Psittacus] (65)
tianquanensis Li Gui-yuan, 1995 [Certhia] (57)
uruguaii Hekstra, 1982 [Otus choliba] (66)
winchelli Sharpe, 1877 [Todiramphus] (45)
TERMS OF USE
This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use.
Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited.
... The same confusion between nomen and parograph is clearly present in the recent paper by David et al. (2009) discussed below: "Spellings not selected by the FR(s), if reused in our text, appear in quotation marks to signal that they are not separately available (Arts. 19.3,32.4). ...
... Another, practical, reason for supporting this change in the Rules, may be that it would make easier the tracing of the valid FRA having fixed the lectoprotograph, as it would appear quicker to survey all the works of a given author than all works by various authors where a FRA could possibly have been taken. David et al. (2009) mentioned "the potential shorter search for a First Reviser in a case previously unconsidered" (p. 14) and stated that such nomenclatural acts by the original authors will always be the valid ones, as "of course they have priority" (p. ...
... This is quite possible, especially when the first subsequent mention of one of the symprotographs by the original author was much delayed after the original publication. Thus, in their review of FR actions in ornithology, David et al. (2009) mentioned 45 cases of IFRA. These took place at various dates after the original publication, from the same year to up to 20 (Haematortyx) or 23 years later (Nectarinia pygmaea). ...
Article
Taxonomy is currently facing a major crisis and is likely to have strong difficulties to reduce significantly the taxonomic gap before the biodiversity crisis has wiped out a large proportion of the living species of the earth. In this context, taxonomists should pay great attention to the nomenclatural Rules, and care for them to help them in this urgent task, rather than diverting their time and energy to secondary or useless questions or debates. A major purpose of the Code is to promote nomenclatural stability in zoology. This requires stability in the Rules, or at least that a great care be taken, when establishing new Rules, to avoid that they can have unexpected deleterious consequences for stability. In particular, in most cases, it is crucial to deny retroactivity to the new Rules. Several examples of problems created in zoological nomenclature by introduction of changes in Articles dealing with the spellings of nomina are examined in detail. These Articles were modified, with retroactive value, in the 1985 edition (Art. 32, 33, 35 and 39) and in the 1999 edition (Art. 24) of the Code. It is shown that these changes, which have no clear "philosophical" or practical justifications and which result in no clear benefits, have in fact had negative impacts on nomenclatural practice. Their implementation requires heavy useless additional work from taxonomists and has negative results in nomenclatural stability that had clearly not been anticipated by the ICZN when promulgating them. In a few sets of nomina tested below, the changes in the 1985 edition resulted in spelling changes for 10.0 to 22.2 % of the nomina, and those in the 1999 edition for 21.7 to 33.3 % of the nomina, roughly a quarter of them on the whole (24.5 %). Among others that are less emblematic, a striking case is that of the fish generic nomen Tetraodon, widely used especially since the genome of a species of this genus has been sequenced, and which should be changed to Tetrodon because of the unwarranted introduction of the new Art. 24.2.4 into the Code. It is suggested that these changes should be cancelled, or at least denied retroactivity from the years of their promulgations. In order to make this discussion easier, a "taxonomy" of the different kinds of spellings of nomina, and a dichotomic key to such situations, are provided. This stresses the fact that detailed discussions on very precise aspects of the functioning of nomenclatural Rules, as well as the computerization of nomenclatural data for online databases, require to use a specialized technical terminology to designate the nomenclatural concepts and tools, not vague "common language" terms like "name" or "type": "keep the Rules, but change the terms". The problems outlined here should be kept in mind by the ICZN before implementing drastic changes in the Rules of nomenclatural availability, as recently suggested.
... This was done by Hellmayr (1903: 166;cf. Dickinson & Pittie 2006: 119;David et al. 2009). As a consequence, the name in the title takes priority over the name in the text, which also makes it an unusual outcome, unless the new name was only mentioned in the title, e.g., Trudeau (1839), Anthony (1890). ...
... 33.2.3) and a homonym (Art. 53.2) of Ichthyophaga Syromiatnikova 1949(David et al., 2009). Subsequently, some ornithologists and others have followed their 'correction', or their own, spelling this bird genus "Ichthyophaga", while others have maintained the valid spelling "Icthyophaga." ...
... 84). David et al. (2009) do not share my interpretation of Neave's way of writing the various spellings of some nomina, but both interpretations should be offered to all colleagues of the international community who will then have the possibility to choose between them. At any rate, in this situation it is not correct to write: "we have found none who cited all three original spellings". ...
Article
In the introduction of their most useful work on First-Reviser (FR) actions in ornithology, David et al. (2009) wrote: “It has been suggested that we should have drawn upon nomenclators. We have not done this. We did examine Neave (1939–1940) and noted that he made clear that in such cases his ‘signals’ were used to identify the first spelling, thus although he gives other spellings we do not consider he was deliberately selecting a spelling in the sense the Code expects.” This decision is a disputable one. According to the Code, any published choice for a scientific name or nomen (Dubois 2000) of a correct original spelling or eunym (Dubois 2000) among multiple original spellings qualifies as an FR action, whatever the “kind” of publication involved. Two kinds of sources were deliberately not examined by David et al. (2009) for their review, and should be so by subsequent authors: (1) the Zoological Record (ZR), published yearly since 1864, and which, especially in its early years, provided comments, nomenclatural acts, synonymisations and even new nomina and new morphonyms for existing nomina (Dubois 2000; e.g., justified and unjustified emendations or incorrect subsequent spellings); (2) the various Nomenclatores Zoologici published in the 19th and 20th century, such as Agassiz (1846 and previous editions), Apstein (1915), Sherborn (1932) and Neave (1939a-b, 1940a-b). All these works fully qualify as scientific publications, and they should be quoted whenever relevant. At least some of these sources include clear or questionable FR actions between multiple original spellings.
... Populations from Tunisia are intermediate in bill size between Crested Lark from Morocco and Maghreb Lark, but their mtDNA clusters with Crested Lark (Guillaumet et al. 2006). Although the name randonii was used for Maghreb Lark by Guillaumet and his coauthors (see David et al. 2009 for the correct spelling of this name), macrorhyncha has priority over randonii for the valid name of the Maghreb Lark (see Dickinson & Christidis 2014). Crested Lark is thus best treated as two species: ...
Article
Full-text available
Recommendations in this report fall into four categories: (1) changes in generic allocation (Porzana parva, P. pusilla, Charadrius asiaticus, C. veredus, C. leschenaultii, C. mongolus, C. pecuarius, C. alexandrinus, Egretta intermedia, Dendrocopos medius, D. minor), (2) changes in the taxonomic sequence of species (Charadrius, Dendrocopos, Sylvia, Emberiza), (3) changes in species limits (Porphyrio porphyrio, Circus cyaneus, Cyanopica cyanus, Galerida cristata), and (4) changes in subspecies limits or subspecies recognition (Somateria mollissima faeroeensis, S. m. borealis).
... In particular, the Rules concerning first reviser actions among multiple original spellings have been modified in the current edition of the Code (Art. 24.2.3-4) which has unexpected consequences on the correct spellings of some nomina (David et al. 2009;Dubois 2010). ...
Article
Full-text available
The rapid success of Zootaxa has been due in part to the decentralization of its editorial process and to the taxonomic specialization of members of the editorial board (Zhang 2010). Both these factors allowed a quicker publication of papers than in many other journals, after an appropriate review by editors well acquainted with the taxa covered and the relevant literature.
... Thus doing, De Blainville acted as first-reviser and restricted the use of the nomen AMPHIBIENS to the class. This situation is similar to that of Article 24.2.4 of the Code, which states that to act validly as a first-reviewer, the author of two nomina or spellings does not have to cite them both (see David et al. 2009). In his subsequent works (e.g., Ducrotay de Blainville 1829de Blainville , 1833De Blainville 1835, 1847, he used only the nomen AMPHIBIENS for the class, and never mentioned again this nomen for the order. ...
Article
Full-text available
Many new higher-ranked taxa are currently recognized by taxonomists as a result of the numerous phylogenetic hypotheses which are regularly published. The absence in the Code of Rules for the nomenclature of taxa above the rank superfamily (class-series nomenclature) is a factor of growing chaos in zoological taxonomy. This is why dubois (2005) proposed a set of formal Rules for this nomenclature, which should be discussed and considered for incorporation into the Code. This paper focuses on a particular point regarding these proposed Rules, i.e., whether class-series nomina should be considered nomenclaturally available from their first publication in any modern language, provided they were latinized subsequently, or only from their first use in a latinized form. It is argued that the first solution should be retained, not only "to render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's", but also for simple internal consistency within the Code. According to the Rules of the Code, generic nomina may be available, with their original authors and dates, even if directly transferred unchanged from modern languages, and family-series nomina, first published in a nonlatinized form, may be available, with their original authors and dates, provided they have been subsequently latinized. These general statements are illustrated with the higher nomenclature of several taxa including amphibians. According to the proposed Rules, the following nomina, authors and dates are the valid ones for the taxa they designate: VERTEBRATA Cuvier, 1800; AMPHIBIA de Blainville, 1816; GYMNOPHIONA Rafinesque-Schmaltz, 1814; BATRACHIA Brongniart, 1800; ANURA duméril, 1806; URODELA duméril, 1806; AMPHIPNEUSTA Merrem, 1820.
Article
Full-text available
Overlooked and unanswered nomenclatural observations from 30 years ago, mostly based on perceived shortcomings in the Check-list of Birds of the World by J. L. Peters and his successors, are examined. Many are rebutted, a number endorsed and recommended.
Article
This 11th part of “Type specimens of birds in the American Museum of Natural History” includes taxa in the passerine families included in volume 14 of Peters' Check-list of birds of the world (Paynter, 1968). The original description of each name has been consulted and the currently accepted name of the taxon has been listed with reference to recent publications. The coordinates and modern names of type localities are given when found and comments on taxonomic history are provided. In this part, 352 names are treated; for 20 of these, name-bearing types are not in AMNH or were not found.This part of the type list, as well as all previous parts, are searchable and available for download from the AMNH Library website (http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/).
Article
Full-text available
The group of small forest robins, or akalats, that dwell in lowland and montane forests in Africa have complicated parapatric or partly overlapping distributions, the details of which are still being discovered. Here, we use external morphology and mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequence data to determine the reciprocal monophyly of several populations, including one form that is related to Sheppardia lowei and S. montana. Those data corroborate the recognition of a new species, Sheppardia aurantiithorax, and show relatively high levels of sequence divergence among populations of the different species. The discovery of this new species, narrowly endemic in the Eastern Arc montane forests, emphasizes the complex biodiversity of the region and underscores the need for prompt and effective conservation measures.
Article
The present article examines the nature of several species-group names that are grammatically nouns as well as adjectives, as covered by Art. 31.2.2 of the ICZN (1999) Code. We looked at 139 avian species-group names, 69 of which proved to be nouns and 70 adjectives. Of these 139 names, 18 would need to be corrected in the reference list that we followed (Dickinson 2003). They are: Leptoptilos crumenifer (adjective), Threskiornis moluccus (adjective), Aramides cajaneus (adjective), Porphyrio martinicus (adjective), Turnix sylvaticus lepurana (noun), Ducula aenea vicinus (noun), Amazona mercenarius (noun), Otus choliba cruciger (adjective), Aegotheles bennettii plumifer (adjective), Pogoniulus coryphaea (noun), Schiffornis turdina amazonum (noun), Frederickena unduliger (noun), Premnornis guttuliger (adjective), Monarcha vidua (noun), Calyptocichla serinus (noun), Turdus libonyana (noun), Erythrura trichroa sigillifer (noun) and Thraupis episcopus nesophila (adjective).