Article

Governance structures and the devolved delivery of employment outcomes

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

Research Report DWP commissioned ECOTEC Research and Consulting to undertake a study on effective governance structures for the devolved delivery of employment outcomes. Desk-based research on international approaches to devolving powers from central government to sub-national levels was complemented by a series of case study visits examining devolved approaches being taken forward in Britain. Key findings in terms of applying the lessons learned to potential approaches to devolved governance in the British context are as follows: • Within devolved governance structures operating in the employment sphere in Britain, the experience and trust built up in recent years indicates that some of the infrastructure required for effectively devolving employment policy is in place, or at least developing well. However, if devolutionary moves are expanded, for example to encompass all sub-regions in Britain, the process of developing an infrastructure to support devolved governance on a wider scale is likely to be a long-term undertaking, particularly in light of the fact that some areas will be starting from a much lower base. • There remain concerns amongst actors operating at the devolved level over the pace and scope of change, and local capacity to respond to this, should moves towards devolution increase. In such a context, central government and its departments would have a key role in ensuring that devolved governance can be operationalised at the sub-national level. This role is likely to encompass the provision of capacity building support for local actors, along with recognition that time, support and guidance are significant in ensuring that the cultural shifts essential to successful devolved governance can be achieved. • A well balanced approach to performance management and accountability is essential in the devolved governance context. Approaches to monitoring and managing performance should reflect the totality of activities undertaken within devolved arrangements. Equally, they should be carefully designed so as to effectively support the development of activities at devolved levels whilst not driving decision making. • Where innovation is a desired outcome from developing devolved governance structures, promoting such innovation is as much about how those structures are implemented and managed as about the type of governance approach adopted. As such there is a requirement for active and ongoing intervention to maintain a focus on innovation as an explicit desired outcome, along with support and guidance to develop reciprocal trust between central and local levels. • In the context of the greater use of contestability and market-based systems as one route to devolved governance, there is a need for ongoing attention, co-ordination and management on the part of Government to ensure this complements, and does not cut across, devolved multi-agency partnership approaches in the shape of Multi-Area Agreements and City Strategy Pathfinders.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... The processes by which soft spaces emerge are consistent with the extension of neoliberal ideas into the sphere of interventions designed to get people back to work (see Jessop, 2003;Peck, 2007). Thus this article is located in terms of the broader literature on welfare state reform and governance of local partnership arrangements (Atkinson, 2010;Davies, 2005;Meegan et al., 2014). ...
... The way in which activity in soft space is evaluated is of relevance theoretically, in terms of both the wider study of neoliberal processes affecting back-to-work support and how this then interacts with debates about forms of local governance. CS lies midway along Atkinson's (2010) continuum from centralisation to localisation of employment initiatives in terms of devolution to local level of budgets and other responsibilities. Soft space is also of relevance from a policy viewpoint given the drive to greater localisation within welfare-towork, which itself results from pursuing a broadly neoliberal approach. ...
... The idea of 'soft spaces' draws primarily on spatial and political conceptualisations of localism, and are specifically neoliberal in terms of the transfer of some the state's powers, activities and responsibilities downwards and sideways to a range of local actors (from the public, private and third sectors). As noted above, Atkinson (2010) has developed a centralised/localised framework to aid understanding of employment initiatives. So the question is not so much whether this welfare-to-work programme is centralised or localised, but the degree to which it is to one end of the scale or the other and also the nature of the powers and responsibilities which have been transferred. ...
Article
This article uses the concepts of ‘soft spaces’ and ‘soft outcomes’ previously developed in relation to the study of local economic development and planning and applies them to the related, but not identical, field of localised welfare-to-work initiatives. The specific example of the City Strategy initiative in Great Britain provides evidence of these concepts in action. This initiative foregrounded the importance of local partnership working whereby various stakeholders joined together to operate in soft space to achieve commonly agreed goals. The article considers how local partnerships operate in soft space and the appropriate measures of success to be used when assessing the efficacy of their interventions. It is argued that both ‘soft outcomes’ and ‘hard outcomes’ can be used to understand success; but that assessment of soft spaces only in terms of ‘hard outcomes’ is far from comprehensive.
... In light of potential moves to effectively operationalise devolved governance in the sphere of employment policy, significant considerations include: how best to devolve budgets to sub-national levels; whether particular governance approaches are likely to lead to innovative activity; how to devolve powers to local levels whilst retaining an effective performance management role; and the role of central government itself in supporting and facilitating devolved governance (Atkinson 2010). In addition, numerous case studies from the UK offer evidence that there is often a considerable implementation gap between the rhetoric and the development of partnership working (Carson and Kerr 2010). ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks distinguish between contrasting visions from various literatures, which they label Type I and Type II multi-level governance. Type I multi-level governance echoes federalist thought, conceiving the dispersion of authority as being limited to a 'limited number of non-overlapping jurisdictional boundaries at a limited number of levels'. In this view, authority is relatively stable and analysis is focused on individual governments rather than specific policies. Type II multi-level governance provides a vision of governance that is 'a complex, fluid, patchwork of innumerable, overlapping jurisdictions'. Here, jurisdictions are often overlapping and tend to be flexible as demands for governance change.
Article
This article examines the role of inter-agency cooperation, which is one form of ‘partnership’, in new approaches to employability in the UK. The article articulates a ‘model for effective partnership working’ on employability. This model is applied first in a general review of employability policy and then to discuss case study research on the recent ‘Pathways to Work’ and ‘Working Neighbourhoods’ pilots. It is argued that successful partnerships need a clear strategic focus based on a necessity for inter-agency cooperation and institutional arrangements that allow for shared ownership, trust and mutualism, and flexibility in resource-sharing. While some of these factors are apparent in UK employability services, an over-reliance on contractualism and centralized organizational structures may undermine partnership-based approaches. Many of the success factors associated with effective partnership working appeared to be in place, even though the role of the Public Employment Service was fundamentally different in each case (as a key actor in implementing the first pilot, but largely withdrawing from the implementation role in the second). The article concludes by outlining the relevance of this model and the case study findings to discussions of the future development of employability policies and related partnership working.
Fiscal decentralization in developing countries: An overview
Bird, R. and Vaillancourt, F. (eds.) (2007). Fiscal decentralization in developing countries: An overview. CUP.
WIA implementation in California: findings and recommendations. Department of human and community development
  • D Campbell
Campbell, D. et al. (2006). WIA implementation in California: findings and recommendations. Department of human and community development, University of California.
Roles and responsibilities in the local performance framework
  • Clg
CLG (2008a). Roles and responsibilities in the local performance framework.
Tackling worklessness: A review of the contribution and role of English local authorities and partnerships -final report
  • Clg
CLG (2009). Tackling worklessness: A review of the contribution and role of English local authorities and partnerships -final report, CLG.
Reducing dependency, increasing opportunity: options for the future of welfare to work
DWP (2007). Reducing dependency, increasing opportunity: options for the future of welfare to work.
Raising expectations and increasing support: reforming welfare for the future
DWP (2008b). Raising expectations and increasing support: reforming welfare for the future.
DWP commissioning strategy
DWP (2008c). DWP commissioning strategy.
Fresh approaches to employment activation and sustainable communities: lessons for the competitiveness and employment regions
  • Dg Employment
DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities (2006). Fresh approaches to employment activation and sustainable communities: lessons for the competitiveness and employment regions.
Spring 2009 review of measures to tackle the economic crisis
  • European Employment Observatory
European Employment Observatory (2009). Spring 2009 review of measures to tackle the economic crisis.
The British 'welfare market: lessons from contracting out welfare programmes in Australia and the
  • D Finn
Finn, D. (2008). The British 'welfare market: lessons from contracting out welfare programmes in Australia and the Netherlands, JRF, York.
Local Governance for promoting employment: comparing the performance of Japan and seven countries
  • S Giguère
  • Y Higuchi
Giguère, S. and Higuchi, Y. (2005). Local Governance for promoting employment: comparing the performance of Japan and seven countries. OECD and Japan Institute for Labour policy and training, Japan.
Phase 2 evaluation of Multiple Provider Employment Zones: Qualitative study
  • S Johnson
Johnson, S. et al. (2006). Phase 2 evaluation of Multiple Provider Employment Zones: Qualitative study. DWP Research Report No. 399.
Pushing back the frontiers: the multi-area agreement pioneers
  • Lga
LGA (2007). Pushing back the frontiers: the multi-area agreement pioneers.
The integration gap: developing a devolved welfare and skills system
  • Lga
LGA (2008). The integration gap: developing a devolved welfare and skills system.
From recession to recovery II: a focus on unemployment
  • Lga
LGA (2009). From recession to recovery II: a focus on unemployment.
Working together for employment and inclusion in Edinburgh: a baseline study
  • R Mcquaid
McQuaid, R. et al. (2005). Working together for employment and inclusion in Edinburgh: a baseline study, Employment Research Institute, Napier University, Edinburgh.
Flexibility and accountability in labour market policy: A synthesis in Managing decentralisation: A new role for labour market policy
  • H Mosley
Mosley, H. (2003). Flexibility and accountability in labour market policy: A synthesis in Managing decentralisation: A new role for labour market policy, OECD publishing.
Skills and employment action plan for Wales
  • Naw
NAW (2005). Skills and employment action plan for Wales (2005), Circular No: 51/2004, NAW.
Skills that work for Wales: A skills and employment strategy and action plan
  • Naw
NAW (2008). Skills that work for Wales: A skills and employment strategy and action plan, NAW.
Devolution and regional governance: Tackling the economic needs of deprived areas
  • D North
North, D. et al. (2007). Devolution and regional governance: Tackling the economic needs of deprived areas, JRF, York.
National Evaluation of Local Strategic Partnerships: Issues Paper: Local Strategic Partnerships, Multi-level Governance and Economic Development
  • Odpm
ODPM (2005). National Evaluation of Local Strategic Partnerships: Issues Paper: Local Strategic Partnerships, Multi-level Governance and Economic Development.
Local partnerships for better Governance
  • Oecd
OECD (2001). Local partnerships for better Governance, OECD Publications, Paris.
Decentralisation of Employment Policies and New Forms of Governance: Tackling the Challenge of Accountability
  • Oecd
OECD (2003). Decentralisation of Employment Policies and New Forms of Governance: Tackling the Challenge of Accountability, OECD Paper to support the 'Decentralisation of Employment Policies and New Forms of Governance: Tackling the Challenge of Accountability' Conference, Warsaw, Poland, 27-28 March 2003.
Successful partnerships: a Guide
  • Oecd Leed
OECD LEED (2006a). Successful partnerships: a Guide, Vienna. At: http://www. oecd.org/dataoecd/42/49/36279186.pdf, accessed 18 March 2009.
Long term evaluation of local area agreements and local strategic partnerships: research findings 1: case studies issues first report
  • H Russell
Russell, H. (2008a). Long term evaluation of local area agreements and local strategic partnerships: research findings 1: case studies issues first report, CLG.
Long term evaluation of local area agreements and local strategic partnerships -case studies issues paper
  • H Russell
Russell, H. (2008b). Long term evaluation of local area agreements and local strategic partnerships -case studies issues paper, CLG.
Workforce plus: an employability framework for Scotland and Scottish Government. Scottish Executive
  • Scottish Executive
Scottish Executive (2006). Workforce plus: an employability framework for Scotland and Scottish Government. Scottish Executive, Edinburgh.
Employability framework for Scotland: report of the interventions work stream
  • Scottish Government
Scottish Government (2005). Employability framework for Scotland: report of the interventions work stream, Scottish Government, Edinburgh.
Report on the employability Initiatives in the better neighbourhood services fund, Scottish Government
  • Scottish Government
Scottish Government (2006). Report on the employability Initiatives in the better neighbourhood services fund, Scottish Government, Edinburgh.
Scottish Government economic strategy. Scottish Government
  • Scottish Government
Scottish Government (2007). Scottish Government economic strategy. Scottish Government, Edinburgh.
Achieving our potential: a framework to tackle poverty and income inequality in Scotland, Scottish Government
  • Scottish Government
Scottish Government (2008). Achieving our potential: a framework to tackle poverty and income inequality in Scotland, Scottish Government, Edinburgh.
Long term evaluation of local area agreements and local strategic partnerships report of the first round of stakeholder interviews
  • H Sullivan
  • E Lepine
Sullivan, H. and Lepine, E. (2008b). Long term evaluation of local area agreements and local strategic partnerships report of the first round of stakeholder interviews, CLG.