ArticlePDF AvailableLiterature Review

Informed Consent for Braces

Authors:

Abstract

The influence of law on the orthodontic profession has greatly increased in the last few decades. Dental law has emerged today as a full-fedged specialty dealing with a variety of areas, like professional negligence, doctor-patient contracts, consumer protection laws, ethics, general and special health legislations and practice regulatory mechanisms. This article highlights the concept of informed consent which is based on the premise that each individual has a right to make decisions concerning his health, disease and treatment. How to cite this article: Jharwal V, Trehan M, Rathore N, Rathee P, Agarwal D, Mathur N. Informed Consent for Braces. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(2):105-108.
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, May-August 2014;7(2):105-108
105
IJCPD
Informed Consent for Braces
Informed Consent for Braces
1
Vikas Jharwal,
2
Mridula Trehan,
3
Nidhi Rathore,
4
Pooja Rathee,
5
Deepesh Agarwal,
6
Nikunj Mathur
IJCPD
REVIEW ARTICLE
1,3
Senior Lecturer,
2
Professor and Head
4,6
Assistant Professor,
5
Reader
1-3
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Mahatma Gandhi Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur
Rajasthan, India
4
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Government Dental College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
5
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Jaipur Dental College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
6
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Government
Dental College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Corresponding Author: Vikas Jharwal, E-117/118, Siddharth
Apartment, Sect-14, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302017
India, Phone: 91-9982000019, e-mail: vikasjharwal19@
gmail.com
10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1246
ABSTRACT
The inuence of law on the orthodontic profession has greatly
increased in the last few decades. Dental law has emerged
today as a full-edged specialty dealing with a variety of areas,
like professional negligence, doctor-patient contracts, consumer
protection laws, ethics, general and special health legislations
and practice regulatory mechanisms. This article highlights the
concept of informed consent which is based on the premise
that each individual has a right to make decisions concerning
his health, disease and treatment.
Keywords: Consent, Informed consent, Ethics, Medicolegal
perspective.
How to cite this article: Jharwal V, Trehan M, Rathore N,
Rathee P, Agarwal D, Mathur N. Informed Consent for Braces.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(2):105-108.
Source of support: Nil
Conict of interest: None declared
INTRODUCTION
The Websters dictionary defines consent as ‘to give assent
or approval’. The over simplification of Websters defini-
tion however does not and should not apply to the field of
dentistry.
1
The British Dental Association (BDA) ‘Ethics
in Dentistry’ advice sheet is a case in point. The concept of
medical informed consent is evident already in the Hippo-
cratic Oath, which clearly illustrates the notion that respect
is an integral part of the relationship between patients and
healthcare professionals in the pledge, ‘first, do no harm’.
2
CONSENT TO DENTISTRY
Informed consent is not a signature on a consent form. It is
not a single event, it is a process of dialog between the den-
tist and the patient. The British Dental Association ‘Ethics
in Dentistry’ advice sheet defines the process of expressing
consent as ‘a patient gives express consent when he or she
indicates orally or in writing consent to undergo examination
or treatment or for personal information to be processed’.
2,3
TYPES OF CONSENT
The BDA Ethics in Dentistry further lays down the follow-
ing definitions:
2,3
• Impliedconsent: Where the patient indicates agreement
to examine by lying in the dental chair and opening the
mouth.
• Validconsent: For consent to be valid, it must be specific,
informed and normally be given by a patient, or a parent
or a guardian.
• Writtenconsent: It is to be taken for major procedures,
examples being in orthodontics, therapeutic extraction,
orthognathic surgery, orthodontic mini-implant place-
ment, sedation, etc. Written consent is all the above with
a signature of the patient. Written consent is important
but cannot be considered a substitute for obtaining valid
consent. This brings us to the obvious question of the
right age of patient for giving consent.
• Informed consent: Requires a full explanation of the
nature, purpose and material risks of the proposed
procedures in a language that the patient understands.
The patient should have the opportunity to consider the
information and ask questions in order to arrive at a
balanced judgment of whether to proceed with the
proposed treatment.
The following information is provided to patients who
will be starting orthodontic treatment in dental office:
While recognizing the benefits of teeth that function well
and have a pleasing appearance, a patient should be aware
that orthodontic treatment, like any other treatment of the
human body, has inherent risks and limitations. If a patient
decides not to proceed with treatment, then the state of the
dentition (teeth) can be expected to continue on its present
path. But, the rate of these changes is very unpredictable.
A patient must balance the risks of nontreatment against
the risks of treatment. In our opinion, the risks of treatment
106
Vikas Jharwal et al
are not enough to rule against proceeding; nevertheless, a
patient should consider them carefully before they make a
final decision.
4,6
PATIENT’S RESPONSIBILITIES
Orthodontic treatment will not be completely successful
unless a patient complies with the directions given by us.
Many treatment forces are applied by our patient outside
of the office. A patient needs to fulfill their responsibilities
because the patient’s effort is equal to their treatment result.
It is just that simple! Typically, these responsibilities will
include the following:
• Correct use of the appliance: Orthodontic appliances
are designed to deliver forces in a very specific manner.
If the appliance is not worn as requested, the treatment
will not proceed as planned.
• Meticulousoralhygiene: A thorough brushing several
times each day, complete ossing once each day and
daily application of a uoride mouth rinse are important.
• Careoftheappliance: Lost, broken or bent appliances
disrupt the treatment plan. Unwanted tooth movement
may occur, if the appliance is not working as designed.
• Regularlyscheduledappointments: Appliances must be
adjusted periodically and treatment progress must be
monitored carefully. Missed or rescheduled appointments
prolong treatment inevitably. Some appointments will be
during work or school hours.
• Routinedentalvisits: An orthodontic patient should conti-
nue to consult his/her family dentist for regular cavity
check-ups, teeth cleaning, sealants and uoride varnish
applications and periodontal evaluations based on their
risk assessment.
4,6,9
TOOTH DECAY/STAINS/DECALCIFICATION
The bacteria present in plaque (the white, sticky material that
is constantly forming on tooth surfaces) release acids that
draws the calcium and phosphorous out of the outer surface
of the tooth. This will damage patient’s tooth surfaces if the
plaque is not removed several times each day by thorough
brushing, ossing and rinsing. This damage includes tooth
decay and permanent white decalcification markings. The
bacteria that live in plaque thrive on refined carbohydrates
(sugar!). While a patient is undergoing orthodontic treat-
ment, they should minimize the amount and frequency of
sugar in their diet. These same problems can occur without
orthodontic treatment, but the risk is greater to an individual
wearing braces.
4,6,9
INFLAMMATION OF THE SOFT TISSUES
The wires, brackets or band attachments can sometimes
irritate the lips, cheeks or gum tissue. These soft tissue
irritations usually heal quickly. The wax that we give our
patients can help cushion these irritations while they are
healing. If the irritation is persistent, a patient should contact
us immediately so that we can solve the problem. Poor oral
hygiene during orthodontic tooth movement can accelerate
deterioration of the periodontal tissues (gums and under-
lying bone). Severe tissue reactions may require us to refer
a patient to a periodontal (gum) specialist or discontinue
orthodontic treatment.
4,6,9
TREATMENT GOALS AND
TREATMENT COMPLETION
We have tried to establish realistic and achievable goals
for treatment. We know that patients share our desire to
produce the best result that is possible. As we begin treat-
ment, we believe that we will be able to achieve those goals.
Nevertheless, unforeseen factors, such as atypical tooth
formation and disproportionate jaw growth may interfere
with our intentions. These biological processes are beyond
the orthodontist’s control. As treatment proceeds, we will
keep a patient fully informed as to treatment progress. If
our original goals become unreachable, we will discuss the
alternatives with the patient.
4,6,9
TREATMENT DURATION
Although we give an estimate to a patient of his/her treatment
time, we do not know exactly how long his/her treatment
will take. Individuals vary considerably in their response to
orthodontic forces, so treatment time may be more or less
than our estimate. It is our general intention to have the
treatment move along in a fashion that is consistent with
tissue health, minimal discomfort and long-term stability.
6,10
PAIN OR DISCOMFORT IN
THE JOINT OF THE JAW
Pain, discomfort, clicking or popping noises may occur in
or near the joint of the jaw at any time, including during
orthodontic treatment. Just as with any joint discomfort,
the possible causes vary widely. Orthodontic treatment did
not provide risk to the development of signs and symptoms
of TMD, regardless of the technique used for treatment,
the extraction or nonextraction of premolars and the type
of malocclusion previously presented by the patient. It is
important that we be told about jaw joint problems so that
we can deal with them promptly.
6,9,10
LOSS OF TOOTH VITALITY
It is possible for the nerve of a tooth to die during orthodontic
treatment, especially if a tooth was previously injured,
bumped or impacted. It is helpful in our monitoring the
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, May-August 2014;7(2):105-108
107
IJCPD
Informed Consent for Braces
health of each tooth for a patient to tell us about any pre-
vious injury or stress to the tooth. Sometimes seemingly
minor bumps can result in nerve damage that is unknown
to a patient. Such previous injuries cannot always be detec-
ted during the orthodontic diagnostic process. Root canal
treatment may be recommended if such a problem occurs.
Extraction is necessary occasionally, though not usually.
6,10
INJURY FROM APPLIANCES
Appliances are designed to have a maximum amount of
strength and a minimum amount of injury potential. Never-
theless, accidents can occur and a patient can be injured
by sharp parts of the appliances. A patient could also be
injured during a routine appointment by one of our sharp
instruments. It is also possible for a patient to swallow or
inhale small parts of the appliance that fall into the back of
the throat at any time, including routine office visits. Every-
one working with a patient in the office will be attentive
particularly to preventing accidents. Headgear instructions
must be followed carefully. Improperly handled headgear
may cause injury to the face or eyes, even blindness. Patients
are warned not to wear the headgear during times of horse-
play or competitive activity. Always release the elastic force
before removing the headgear from the teeth. Although our
headgear is equipped with a safety system, we urge caution
at all times. Tender teeth should be expected after in office
adjustments. The period of tenderness or sensitivity varies
with each patient and the procedure performed. Typically,
post adjustment tenderness may last 24 to 48 hours. Abnor-
mal wear of tooth structures is also possible if a patient grinds
his/her teeth excessively.
5,6,10
UNEXPECTED GROWTH CHANGES
Growth of the facial structures and the teeth can sometimes
take unexpected turns. A child who has grown in average
proportions may not continue to do so. If growth becomes
disproportionate, the jaw relationships can be affected. If
this occurs, original treatment objectives may not be met.
6,10
UNEXPECTED TOOTH ERUPTION PROBLEMS
Sometimes when a tooth is erupting (growing in), it does
not follow the usual and expected direction of eruption.
The tooth may not be able to reach its normal position and
will become impacted or stuck under the bone. Usually, it
is possible to solve these impactions, but not always. If the
impaction is extreme and the tooth becomes tightly bound
to its surrounding bone, it may not be possible to move
that tooth at all. We will be monitoring the teeth carefully
as they grow into catch such a problem. If a tooth does
become impacted, a change in the plan of treatment may
be necessary.
6,10
ENAMEL FRACTURES
Tooth enamel is a crystalline structure and like other crystals,
it can have undetected defects and fracture lines within it.
As a result, even when extreme care is taken, enamel can
fracture during placement or removal of the appliances. Such
fractures may also occur if a band or bracket is bitten on at
just the wrong angle or if the enamel has been weakened
by decay or dental restorations (fillings). The enamel may
also be damaged by rubbing against a part of the appliance.
Tooth colored ceramic brackets are abrasive to enamel. A
patient must be sure to report if any tooth is bearing against
a ceramic bracket.
6,10
ORAL SURGERY
Sometimes tooth removal or orthognathic (jaw) surgery is
necessary in conjunction with orthodontic treatment, espe-
cially to correct crowding or severe jaw imbalances. We
will recommend these procedures only if it improves the
prospects for successful treatment. Risks involved with treat-
ment and anesthesia should be discussed with the patient’s
general dentist or oral surgeon before making a decision to
proceed with this procedure.
6,10
SUCCESS OF THE TREATMENT
We intend to do everything possible to provide the very
best treatment result. However, we cannot guarantee that
the proposed treatment will be successful to a patient’s
complete satisfaction. Individual patient differences create
the possibility of incomplete or unstable results. Selec-
tive retreatment may be necessary despite the very best of
care.
6,10
Emphasis must be placed on early, timely inter-
vention, parental involvement, effective communication,
cultural competence, and the ‘medical/dental home’ concept
as methods to reduce negative dental attitudes and behaviors
of children.
11
Although some patients were happy with the
way, their consent was obtained examples were also given
of lack of information, confusion and even of deceit.
12
ADDITIONAL TREATMENT
Unforeseen circumstances, such as growth changes or gum
disease, may cause us to recommend a form of treatment not
previously discussed. These changes in treatment plan may
require additional treatment in our office or with another
specialist. Additional treatment with associated fees will be
discussed with the patient.
7,6,10
ROOT RESORPTION
Orthodontic forces initiate a cellular response in the sup-
porting tissues surrounding the roots of the teeth. It is this
cellular response that allows the teeth to move. Sometimes,
108
Vikas Jharwal et al
this response becomes confused resulting in damage to the
ends of the roots of the teeth. Usually, this effect is mild and
does not compromise the teeth. However, sometimes this
root resorption can be extensive and may then endanger the
teeth, if periodontal (bone and gum) support is lost at some
future time. Some patients are prone to this happening, some
are not. Because it is not possible to predict which teeth
might be affected, we may want to take progress X-rays of
a patient’s teeth during the treatment process to evaluate
whether root resorption is occurring.
6,10
STABILITY OF THE FINAL RESULT
The tooth positions achieved at the end of treatment may
not be perfectly stable. The retainers that, a patient wears,
will enhance the stability of the final result, but even diligent
wear of the retainers may not keep a patient’s teeth exactly
as they were at treatment’s end. The teeth and jaw structures
are dynamic system that constantly changes throughout one’s
lifetime. Orthodontic treatment does not make a patient
immune to this process. Maturational changes that occur
after active orthodontic treatment may alter the quality of
the end result. Ongoing wear of the retainers will minimize
changes. If a patient decides to stop wearing, his/her retai-
ners at some point, his/her teeth may change. Some of the
original problem may re-emerge.
6,8,10
CONCLUSION
Clearly, there are a number of sources of potential iatrogenic
damage to the patient during orthodontic treatment. However,
severe damage is rare. Severe malocclusions have more to
benefit from treatment than less severe malocclusions, and
motivation between such groups may vary. Individuals
should be assessed for risk factors for all aspects of care
content and recommendations are analyzed and discussed
from a medicolegal perspective. It is important that such
guidelines are updated in the light of research findings and
clinical audit. Clinicians should be aware of such guidelines
and the legal implications of failing to at least consider when
providing advice and/or treatment for patients.
REFERENCES
1. Merriam-Websters collegiate dictionary. 11th ed. Springfield,
MA: Merriam-Webster, 2005.
2. Sharma A, Chhabra A, Sharma A. Patient consent in dentistry:
are we legally safe. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2011;5(2):68-72.
3. Jerrold L. Informed consent and contributory negligence. Am J
Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2001;119(1):85-87.
4. Jerrold L. Informed consent in orthodontics. Am J Orthod
Dentofac Orthop 1988;93:251-258.
5. Cruz LD. Risk management in clinical practice: Part 2. Getting
to ‘yes’ the matter of consent. Br Dent J 2010;209:71-74.
6. Maruo IT, Colucci MG, Vieira S, Tanaka O, Camargo ES, Maruo H.
Study of the legality of orthodontic practice by general practice
dentists. R Dent Press Orthod Orthop Facial 2009 Nov;14(6):
1-42.
7. Jerrold L. Litigation, legislation, and ethics: defending claims
for lack of informed consent. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop
2004 Mar;125(3):391-393.
8. Graskemper JP. A new perspective on dental malpractice: Prac-
tice enhancement through risk management. J Am Dent Assoc
2002;133(6):752-757.
9. Leite RA, Rodrigues JF, Sakima MT, Sakima T. Relationship
between temporomandibular disorders and orthodontic treat-
ment: a literature review. Dent Press J Orthod 2013;18(1):150-157.
10. Jones JW. A medicolegal review of some current UK guidelines
in orthodontics: a personal view. Br J Orthod 1999 Dec;26(4):
307-324.
11. Feigal RJ. Guiding and managing the child dental patient: a fresh
look at old pedagogy. J Dent Educ 2001;65:1369-1377.
12. King J. Consent: the patient’s view a summary of findings
from a study of patient’s perceptions of their consent to dental
care. Br Dent J 2001;191:36-40.
... It ensures that patients or their legal guardians are making well-informed and voluntary decisions after a thorough explanation of the treatment, its risks, benefits, alternatives and potential outcomes, in comprehensible language. 18 In this sense, it has twofold benefits: it protects the physician against medicolegal claims made by patients, and it also keeps patients safe from any action taken in addition to the initial course of treatment. ...
... To reduce any algorithmic bias, the performance of the algorithm must be evaluated in different races, ethnic groups, age groups, social classes, and other relevant human characteristics. 18 The technology should perform satisfactorily in varied conditions. Model explicability implies that the results and interpretations provided by algorithms should be logical and explainable based on scientific plausibility viz it should be able to answer 'how does it work?' and 'who is responsible for the way it works?'. ...
Article
Full-text available
In the current technological era, dental practitioners are faced with various ethical challenges, highlighting the importance of bioethics in this healthcare discipline. The rise of artificial intelligence has recently sparked a debate regarding the privacy of patient data. While the advancements may offer innovative treatment options, their long-term effects may not be fully understood, raising questions about the responsible implementation of such methods. Thus, conscientious and ethical AI use in dentistry encompasses that patients be notified about how their data is used and also about the involvement of AI-based decision-making. This paper explores the key bioethical considerations in dental healthcare, with a focus on evidence-based AI development and use. The framework of ethical principles and guidelines provided would foster trust between the clinician and patients, while promoting the highest standards of care.
... The duration of the treatment is a critical piece of information that is often most valued by the patient. Providing a credible and realistic estimate of treatment duration is of great importance, as it forms a key component of the orthodontic informed consent process, payments plan, and significantly influences patient satisfaction [2,3]. ...
... The study concluded that decision tree models outperformed other methods (mean square error of 54.08) and revealed that age, malocclusion, and crowding were the most influential predictors. However, this study and other existing studies on this topic have relied 3 on a limited number of independent variables, such as DI or specific questionnaires. In contrast, our study is unique in its incorporation of cephalometric data for the purpose of predicting orthodontic treatment duration and represents a novel contribution to the field. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
In the field of orthodontics, providing patients with accurate treatment time estimates is of utmost importance. As orthodontic practices continue to evolve and embrace new advancements, incorporating machine learning (ML) methods becomes increasingly valuable in improving orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. This study aimed to develop a novel ML model capable of predicting the orthodontic treatment duration based on essential pre-treatment variables. Patients who completed comprehensive orthodontic treatment at the Indiana University School of Dentistry were included in this retrospective study. Fifty-seven pre-treatment variables were collected and used to train and test 9 different ML models. The performance of each model was assessed using descriptive statistics, intraclass correlation coefficients, and one-way analysis of variance tests. Random Forest, Lasso, and Elastic Net were found to be the most accurate, with a mean absolute error of 7.27 months in predicting treatment duration. Extraction decision, COVID, intermaxillary relationship, lower incisor position, and additional appliances were identified as important predictors of treatment duration. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of ML in predicting orthodontic treatment duration using pre-treatment variables.
... The duration of the treatment is a critical piece of information that is often most valued by the patient. Providing a credible and realistic estimate of treatment duration is of great importance, as it forms a key component of the orthodontic informed consent process and payment plan and significantly influences patient satisfaction [2,3]. ...
Article
Full-text available
In the field of orthodontics, providing patients with accurate treatment time estimates is of utmost importance. As orthodontic practices continue to evolve and embrace new advancements, incorporating machine learning (ML) methods becomes increasingly valuable in improving orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. This study aimed to develop a novel ML model capable of predicting the orthodontic treatment duration based on essential pre-treatment variables. Patients who completed comprehensive orthodontic treatment at the Indiana University School of Dentistry were included in this retrospective study. Fifty-seven pre-treatment variables were collected and used to train and test nine different ML models. The performance of each model was assessed using descriptive statistics, intraclass correlation coefficients, and one-way analysis of variance tests. Random Forest, Lasso, and Elastic Net were found to be the most accurate, with a mean absolute error of 7.27 months in predicting treatment duration. Extraction decision, COVID, intermaxillary relationship, lower incisor position, and additional appliances were identified as important predictors of treatment duration. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of ML in predicting orthodontic treatment duration using pre-treatment variables.
... The data was recorded and statistically analyzed. In rural areas, the frequency of caries was 89.6%, and the intensity indicators DMF-T and DMF-S were 4. 38 41 The legal profession's effect on the orthodontic profession has grown significantly in the previous several decades. Dental law has evolved into a full-fledged speciality that deals with a wide range of issues, including professional negligence, doctor-patient contracts, consumer protection laws, ethics, general and particular health legislation, and practise regulatory procedures. ...
Book
This book contains recent information on risk assessment and management in clinical orthodontics.
... An overabundance of information can make it difficult to obtain proper informed consent. 8,9 Allowing enough time for the patient to contemplate the provided information is also essential. ...
Article
Every doctor-patient relationship must be based on a fundamental understanding of patient auton- omy, defined as the patients’ ability to agree or disagree with any recommendation or treatment option made without feeling intimidated or under pressure.2 This means that a dentist should explain a diagnosis to a patient by first educating them about the problem and outlining the appropriate treatment approach. The clinician should next encourage the patient to think about this information carefully and offer to answer any follow-up questions, with the ultimate goal of actively aiding the patient in making an informed health care decision.
... The process of informed consent requires patients to understand the options for treatment, including no treatment at all, as well as appreciating the risks and benefits involved. [9] It is incumbent on the clinician to determine what is important for each particular patient, and tailor the consent process appropriately, so the patient understands the commitment that is needed to get the best result, while minimizing the risks. Orthodontic treatment is a big commitment for any patient, and it could be argued that for most orthodontic patients, the aspect that requires the largest commitment is the need to wear and maintain retainers in the long term. ...
Article
Full-text available
As our understanding of orthodontic relapse has improved, there is an increasing move toward long-term retention. Safely reducing relapse using appropriate long-term retention imposes considerable responsibilities on the orthodontist, the patient, and the patient’s general dentist. This article will describe these responsibilities.
... The process of informed consent requires patients to understand the options for treatment, including no treatment at all, as well as appreciating the risks and benefits involved. [9] It is incumbent on the clinician to determine what is important for each particular patient, and tailor the consent process appropriately, so the patient understands the commitment that is needed to get the best result, while minimizing the risks. Orthodontic treatment is a big commitment for any patient, and it could be argued that for most orthodontic patients, the aspect that requires the largest commitment is the need to wear and maintain retainers in the long term. ...
... The process of informed consent requires patients to understand the options for treatment, including no treatment at all, as well as appreciating the risks and benefits involved. [9] It is incumbent on the clinician to determine what is important for each particular patient, and tailor the consent process appropriately, so the patient understands the commitment that is needed to get the best result, while minimizing the risks. Orthodontic treatment is a big commitment for any patient, and it could be argued that for most orthodontic patients, the aspect that requires the largest commitment is the need to wear and maintain retainers in the long term. ...
Article
Full-text available
As our understanding of orthodontic relapse has improved, there is an increasing move toward long-term retention. Safely reducing relapse using appropriate long-term retention imposes considerable responsibilities on the orthodontist, the patient, and the patient's general dentist. This article will describe these responsibilities.
Article
Objective The aim of the study was to assess dental patients’ knowledge and perceptions of the risks associated with orthodontic treatment and oral hygiene instructions given at the start of their treatment regimen. Methods The sample group included dental patients aged 12–16 years. Half of the participants were taught using Augmented Reality (AR) technology, while the other half were taught using traditional methods, such as paper-based leaflets. We then assessed retention of the Oral Hygiene Instructions (OHI) and their awareness of the risks associated with orthodontic treatment. This objective was achieved through a knowledge-based survey. Results The feedback from the participants was highly positive and favorable toward AR. Conclusion The videos and leaflet materials were provided to the patients, these two materials effects on patients to understand the information given, but, the group watching the videos had greater scores than those participants reading the leaflet.
Article
Full-text available
OBJETIVO: tendo em vista o conflito existente, no Ordenamento Jurídico brasileiro, entre o princípio da legalidade e o princípio da dignidade da pessoa humana no que diz respeito à prática da Ortodontia pelo cirurgião-dentista não-especialista, este trabalho teve como objetivo analisar a legislação e os julgados dos tribunais nesse assunto. MÉTODOS: realizou-se o levantamento da legislação referente ao ensino e à prática da Ortodontia no Diário Oficial da União e nos órgãos competentes. Com relação aos julgados dos tribunais, a pesquisa foi realizada nos Tribunais de Justiça e nos extintos Tribunais de Alçada de todos os Estados-membros da República Federativa do Brasil, bem como do Superior Tribunal de Justiça e do Supremo Tribunal Federal, utilizando as palavras-chave " Ortodontia" , " ortodôntico" e " ortodontista" . RESULTADOS: a legislação brasileira classifica os cursos de pós-graduação em stricto sensu e lato sensu, os quais possuem normas de funcionamento próprias. As Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais determinam que, no curso de graduação em Odontologia, seja apenas ministrada a Ortodontia Preventiva. Os tribunais brasileiros entendem que, para a prática da Ortodontia Corretiva, é necessária habilitação em curso de pós-graduação. CONCLUSÃO: o curso de graduação em Odontologia é competente para o ensino da Ortodontia Preventiva; somente os cursos de pós-graduação stricto sensu e lato sensu são competentes para ensinar a Ortodontia Corretiva; é inconcebível a interpretação de que o legislador faculta ao cirurgião-dentista não-especialista praticar a Ortodontia Corretiva; e o cirurgião-dentista não-especialista só pode praticar procedimentos que estejam incluídos na categoria de Ortodontia Preventiva e Interceptiva.
Article
Full-text available
The objective of this study was to review the most recent studies from the last 15 years, in search of clinical studies that report the relationship between TMD and orthodontic treatment and/or malocclusion. Our intention was to determine whether orthodontic treatment would increase the incidence of signs and symptoms of TMD, and whether orthodontic treatment would be recommended for treating or preventing signs and symptoms of TMD. Literature reviews, editorials, letters to the editor, experimental studies in animals and short communications were excluded from this review. Were included only prospective, longitudinal, case-control or retrospective studies with a large sample and significant statistical analysis. Studies that dealt with craniofacial deformities and syndromes or orthognathic surgery treatment were also excluded, as well as those that reported only the association between malocclusion and TMD. There were 20 articles relating orthodontics to TMD according to the inclusion criteria. The studies that associated signs and symptoms of TMD to orthodontic treatment showed discrepant results. Some have found positive effects of orthodontic treatment on signs and symptoms of TMD, however, none showed a statistically significant difference. All studies cited in this literature review reported that orthodontic treatment did not provide risk to the development of signs and symptoms of TMD, regardless of the technique used for treatment, the extraction or non-extraction of premolars and the type of malocclusion previously presented by the patient. Some studies with long-term follow-up concluded that orthodontic treatment would not be preventive or a treatment option for TMD.
Article
As with other walks of life the profession of dentistry saw unprecedented change during the last century. Amongst other things, litigation, which is a part of everyday life, has evolved and spread its growing influence on dentistry. Though the litigation and claims are prevalent in almost all countries however, the western countries have been at the forefront of Dental negligence claims. In a way, it is a sign of an informed and mature society. Dentistry in India has been relatively immune to the effects of litigation against dental professionals for a multitude of reasons. But its will not be long before it envelops every aspect of dentistry in India. Dental legislation has its pros and cons; it serves to be a system, which protects patients as well as professionals, but as with other spheres of law, will be subjected to abuse. This article attempts to address the core issue of patient consent, which is where the majority of dental negligence claims arise.
Article
Background. Risk management in dentistry has been developed over the years by concentrating on recording treatment in dental records and informing patients of the proposed treatment before treating them. This article advances the concept of risk management through higher involvement of the entire office staff by increasing communication with patients. Conclusions. By integrating practice management concepts with risk management techniques, dentists can reduce risk,management exposure and improve patients' awareness, understanding and follow-through on the treatment of their dental needs. Practice Implications. Practice enhancement through risk management not only improves patient care and reduces risk exposure, but it also brings the dental team together in an effort to improve patient care. In this way, the office will have improved patient acceptance of proposed dental care and an increase in office growth.
Article
Consent is an integral part of delivering the care patients want. In order to consent to treatment, patients must have the legal capacity to give valid consent. If this three stage test is satisfied, the patient can elect to have any treatment they wish even if it is not in their best interest. Before a patient is able to consent to treatment they must have adequate knowledge about the risks, benefits and alternatives to the treatment. The amount of information provided to the patient by the dentist is determined to some degree by the legal system prevailing. The patient must voluntarily agree to treatment without being coerced by the dentist or other parties and if things change during treatment the patient needs to be advised. Written consent is very useful in the defence of cases but simply signing the consent form does not mean that the patient knows or understands the treatment to which they have agreed.
Article
Aim A study was carried out which aimed to investigate peoples' perceptions of how their consent was given for dental treatment.
Article
The legal doctrine of informed consent has struck a chord of fear in most dental practitioners today. This, in turn, has caused many orthodontists to assume a defensive attitude in their practices. A better posture might be to use informed consent to their own and their patients' best advantage. This is accomplished by using the doctrine to enhance patients' education and understanding of their orthodontic problems, the benefits of corrective therapy, any risks associated therewith, and viable treatment alternatives. The end result is an open and honest relationship with the patients, which promotes doctor/patient autonomy.
Article
This article is a critical analysis from a medico-legal perspective of some current authoritative UK clinical guidelines in orthodontics. Two clinical guidelines have been produced by the Royal College of Surgeons of England and four by the British Orthodontic Society. Each guideline is published with the analysis immediately following it. Following recent UK case law (Bolitho v City & Hackney Health Authority, 1997) which allows the courts to choose between two bodies of responsible expert medical opinion where they feel one opinion is not 'logical', it is likely that the UK courts will increasingly turn to authoritative clinical guidelines to assist them in judging whether or not an appropriate standard of care has been achieved in medical negligence cases. It is thus important for clinicians to be aware of the recommendations of such guidelines, and if these are not followed the reasons should be discussed with the patient and recorded in the clinical case notes. This article attempts to highlight aspects of the guidelines that have medico-legal implications.