ArticlePDF Available

Eight Types of Symmetrically Distinct Vectorlike Physical Quantities

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The Letter draws the attention to the spatiotemporal symmetry of various vectorlike physical quantities. The symmetry is specified by their invariance under the action of symmetry operations of the nonrelativistic space-time rotation group O(3)×{1,1^{'}}=O^{'}(3), where 1^{'} is a time-reversal operation, the symbol×stands for the group direct product, and O(3) is a group of proper and improper rotations. It is argued that along with the canonical polar vector, there are another seven symmetrically distinct classes of stationary physical quantities, which can be-and often are-denoted as standard three-component vectors, even though they do not transform as a static polar vector under all operations of O^{'}(3). The octet of symmetrically distinct "directional quantities" can be exemplified by two kinds of polar vectors (electric dipole moment P and magnetic toroidal moment T), two kinds of axial vectors (magnetization M and electric toroidal moment G), two kinds of chiral "bidirectors" C and F (associated with the so-called true and false chirality, respectively) and still another two bidirectors N and L, achiral ones, transforming as the nematic liquid crystal order parameter and as the antiferromagnetic order parameter of the hematite crystal α-Fe_{2}O_{3}, respectively.
Content may be subject to copyright.
arXiv:1312.0548v2 [physics.class-ph] 17 Feb 2014
Eight types of physical ”arrows” distinguished by Newtonian space-time symmetry.
J. Hlinka
Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
(Dated: February 18, 2014)
The paper draws the attention to the spatiotemporal symmetry of various vector-like physical
quantities. The symmetry is specified by their invariance under the action of symmetry operations
of the Opechowski nonrelativistic space-time rotation group O(3) N{1,1}=O(3), where 1is
time-reversal operation. It is argued that along with the canonical polar vector, there are another
7 symmetrically distinct classes of stationary physical quantities, which can be – and often are –
denoted as standard three-components vectors, even though they do not transform as a static polar
vector under all operations of O(3). The octet of symmetrically distinct ”directional quantities”
can be exemplified by: two kinds of polar vectors (electric dipole moment Pand magnetic toroidal
moment T), two kinds of axial vectors (magnetization Mand electric toroidal moment G), two
kinds of chiral ”bi-directors” Cand F(associated with the so-called true and false chirality, resp.)
and still another two achiral ”bi-directors” Nand L, transforming as the nematic liquid crystal
order parameter and as the antiferromagnetic order parameter of the hematite crystal α-Fe2O3,
respectively.
PACS numbers: 61.50.Ah,11.30.Qc,75.10.-b, 75.25.-j,11.30.Rd
Physical quantities defined by a magnitude and an ori-
ented axis in 3D space are often represented by three-
component Euclidean vectors. Frequently, polar and
axial (or pseudo-) vectors are distinguished, depending
on whether they change their sense or not, respectively,
upon the operation of spatial inversion (parity operation
¯
1).[1–4] For classification of temporal processes or mag-
netic phenomena of vectorial nature, the action of the
time-inversion operator (1) can be used. For example,
magnetization Mand magnetic field vector Hare ”time-
odd axial” vectors (preserved by ¯
1 operation but chang-
ing their sign under the 1operation), electric polariza-
tion Por electric field Eare ”time-even polar” vectors,
while other quantities like velocity vor toroidal moment
Tare ”time-odd polar” vectors.[1–5, 20] The two inver-
sion operations generate an Abelian group of 4 elements
{1,¯
1,1,¯
1}and 4 one-dimensional irreducible represen-
tations; the symmetry operations this group allows to
classify these vectors into 4 categories (see Table I).[1–4]
The aim of this paper is to emphasize that there are
another four types of quantities, which are also defined by
a magnitude, an axis and a geometrical sign, and which
are also often associated by 3D vectors, but which pos-
sess a different spatio-temporal symmetry than the ex-
amples given in Table I). We are going to specify here
all 8 types of ”directional quantities” (i) by describing
1¯
11¯
1vectorial quantity symbol
1 1 1 1 electric toroidal moment G
1-1 1 -1 electric dipole moment P
11 -1 -1 magnetic dipole moment M
1-1 -1 1 (magnetic) toroidal moment T
TABLE I: Action of space (¯
1) and time (1) inversion oper-
ations on selected examples of vectorial quantities: 1 stands
for the invariance, -1 stands for the sign reversal.[3, 7, 10]
G
P M T N C L
F
FIG. 1: Pictographs of 8 kinds of quantities defined by a sign,
a magnitude and an axis. Letter symbols allow to identify
each pictograph with the symmetry assignment given in Ta-
bles I-III. A rrows in pictographs drawn by dashed lines should
be considered as indicating a stationary current or motion
(time inversion operation does change their sense), while those
in pictographs drawn by full lines are time-irreversible (as e.g.
the electric polarization). Pictographs were inspired by pic-
tures employed for similar purpose in Refs. 5, 8, 9.
their transformation properties under the action of the
elements of the Opechowski general space-time rotation
group O(3) N{1,1}=O(3).1=O(3), (ii) by enumer-
ating the associated limiting groups defining their sym-
metry invariance, (iii) by providing several examples to
each case. We shall also briefly discuss possibilities and
difficulties with introduction of formal algebraic manipu-
lations. Simultaneous considerations about all 8 different
types of such directional quantities can be useful in var-
ious areas of physics.
Basic symmetry argument. These 8 symmetrically
different species are resumed pictographically in Fig. 1.
Why do we have just 8 of such quantities? Let us con-
sider any stationary physical quantity X(attached to
a physical object), which simultaneously defines a two-
valued, geometry-related sign, a nonnegative magnitude
and a unique 1D linear subspace of 3D Euclidean space
(an axis of this quantity), but nothing more. Since the
quantity Xdefines a unique axis in the space, the symme-
2
irr. repr. E¯
1mk21¯
1m
k2
symbol
∞ ∞
2km2
km
A1g+
g) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N
A2g
g)1 1 -1 -1 1 1 -1 -1 G
A1u+
u)1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 P
A2u
u)1 -1 -1 1 1 -1 -1 1 C
mA1g(mΣ+
g)1 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 L
mA2g(mΣ
g)1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 1 M
mA1u(mΣ+
u)1 -1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 T
mA2u(mΣ
u)1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 1 -1 F
TABLE II: Characters of one-dimensional irreducible repre-
sentations for selected elements of /mm.1(D
h) group.
The extra dash symbol identifies the operations combined
with time inversion. Irreducible representations are labeled
similarly as that of the /mm group[6, 12], the ”m” symbol
indicates antisymmetry with respect to the time inversion,
similarly as it is adopted for grey[13] symmetry groups of
magnetically ordered crystals[14–16].
try of Xcan be classified by those O(3).1group opera-
tions that leave this axis invariant. Such operations form
an infinite subgroup of O(3).1that could be denoted as
the /mm.1or D
hgroup.[5, 10, 11] Moreover, it is
natural to postulate that the magnitude of X(|X| ≥ 0)
does not change under the operations of O(3).1group.
This implies that transformation properties of Xcan be
fully defined by specifying how its sign is changed when
elements of /mm.1are applied to it. Since we restrict
ourself only to the quantities for which the sign of X
can have only one of the two possible values, the sym-
metry operation can either preserve the sign or change
it to the opposite one. In other words, the action of the
associated /mm.1group operations consist in multi-
plication of the geometrical sign of Xeither by 1 or by
-1. In terms of theory of groups, this implies that X
transforms as one-dimensional (necessarily irreducible)
representation of the associated /mm.1group. It
is known that the /mm (Dh) group has 4 distinct
one-dimensional irreducible representations[6, 12] so the
/mm.1(DhN1,1) one has twice as much of them.
Therefore, the physical quantities defined by a sign, a
magnitude and an axis can be classified in 8 symmetri-
cally different categories.
Classification by irreducible representations
and basic examples. The list of all one-dimensional ir-
reducible representations of the /mm.1group is given
in Table II. First column gives the irreducible represen-
tations label following the convention used e.g. in Refs. 6
and 12, resp., the last column contains a letter symbol
used in Table III. and in Fig. 1. Remaining columns in
the table are associated with the classes of symmetry el-
ements of the /mm.1group. There are various phys-
ical quantities having the listed transformation proper-
ties. For example, polarization (P) and magnetization
(M) transform as A1u+
u) and mA2g(mΣ
g) irreducible
¯
11mklimiting group
Gtime-even axial 1 1 1/m.1
Ptime-even polar 1 1 1 m.1
Mtime-odd axial 1 11/mm
Ttime-odd polar 11 1 /mm
Ntime-even neutral 1 1 1 /mm.1
Ctime-even chiral 1 1 12.1
Ltime-odd neutral 1 1 1 /mm
Ftime-odd chiral 111/mm
TABLE III: List of 8 symmetrically distinct ”arrow” quan-
tities and their transformation under three independent op-
erations /mm.1(D
h) group attached to the axis. (mk
stands for any mirror plane operation parallel to the axis.)
representations, resp. The symbol Tinvokes the often
discussed toroidisation or toroidal moment,[17–21] even
though there are many other more frequently used quan-
tities that also transform as the mA1u(mΣ+
u) represen-
tation, such as electric current, momentum or velocity
of a particle, vector potential or the Poynting vector
S=E×H. It is clear from Table II that this ”magnetic”
toroidal moment Thas a different symmetry than the
”electric” toroidal moment G, the latter exploited e.g.
for characterization of electric polarization vortex states
of small ferroelectric particles[22–24] or poloidal spin
currents[25]. Recently, spontaneous magnetic toroidiza-
tion has been found e.g. in Ba2CoGe2O7crystal[26],
the G-type distortion has been identified e.g. in the
”ferroaxial” structures of CaMn7O12 and RbFe(MoO4)2
crystals.[27–29]
Let us note that Gand Mare symmetric with re-
spect to the perpendicular mirror plane operation m
and Pand Tare symmetric with respect to the paral-
lel mirror plane mk. Thus, none of these quantities is
chiral.[30] In fact, only two irreducible representations
from the Table II. fulfill the group theoretical condition
of a chiral object (absence of improper rotation symme-
try, such as center of inversion or mirror planes[30]): A2u
and mA2u. They are naturally suitable for representa-
tion of chiral directional quantities, as their geometrical
sign can reflect the sign of their enantiomorphism. For
example, a helix might be characterized by its axis, the
magnitude (given by the pitch of the helix) and a geomet-
rical sign, indicating whether the helix is right-handed
or left-handed. Such a chiral quantity Ctransforms as
A2uirreducible representation. As a beautiful example of
mA2uquantity (F) can be taken the antiferromagnetic
order parameter of the linear-magnetoelectric chromite
crystal Cr2O5.[31, 32] This latter kind of chirality, re-
versible upon time reversal, is sometimes called ”false
chirality”.[30, 34]
Finally, there are also two irreducible representations
symmetric with respect to both mkand m(Land N).
The time-odd variant (L) can be used to describe another
type of directional antiferromagnetic order parameter,
e.g. in the hematite crystal α-Fe2O3.[32] The fully sym-
3
metric (A1g) representation is perhaps the most singular
one. It can be associated with the so-called director,
exploited in the theory of liquid crystals to characterize
the spontaneously parallel spatial orientation of rod-like
molecules in nematic phases.[35] In this particular case
there is no reason to define its geometrical sign. However,
there are other N-like quantities that do have a sign. For
example, a consistently defined Frank vector of a wedge
disclination[36–38] should allow to distinguish whether
the disclination can be formed by removing or inserting
material body adjacent to the plane of the cut. At the
same time, this disclination itself is invariant against all
operations of the /mm.1(D
h) group.[36]
Classification in terms of symmetry invariance
groups. Table II defines fully transformation properties
of various uniaxial quantities discussed above. For many
purposes, it is enough to consider only those symmetry
operations, which leave the quantity invariant.[10, 11, 39]
Such operations form infinite subgroups of the /mm.1
group. They are listed for each irreducible representa-
tion in Table III. The content of these invariance group
can be easily figured out from the pictographic symbols
in Fig. 1. In addition, each pictograph shows a segment
indicating the magnitude of the quantity and an arrow
associated with its geometric sign (see Figs. 1 and 2).
Arrows in pictographs drawn by dashed lines should be
considered as indicating a stationary current or motion
(time inversion operation does change their sense). This
is the case of time-odd quantities (L, M, T, F). In con-
trast, the arrows in pictographs drawn by full lines should
be considered as time-irreversible (time inversion opera-
tion does not change them, as they have a grey-group[13]
symmetry). These pictographs stands for the time-even
quantities N, G, P, C. Let us note that the P, T, N, L
quantities, symmetric with respect to the parallel mirror
plane operation mk, have arrows only in the radial direc-
tion, while mk-antisymmetric quantities, G, M, C, F,
have all only tangential arrows (bend arrows should be
understood as drawn on a visible curved surface of a co-
axial circular cylinder.) One can also easily distinguish
the single-arrow pictographs of 2-antisymmetric quan-
tities G, P, M, T (proper vectors) from all the double-
arrow graphical symbols standing for 2-invariant quan-
tities N, C, L, F, which we call here as bi-directors.
Meaning of the geometric parity signs, bi-
directors. The fact that the parity sign can be rep-
resented in this way emphasizes its geometrical nature.
Obviously, the strict meaning of the parity sign relies on
some convention, too. For example, the vector of electric
dipole moment is taken as pointing towards the center of
the positive charge (and not the opposite), the arrow as-
sociated with the velocity of a particle is drawn towards
its future position (and not the opposite), the sense of
the electric current refers normally to the velocity of the
positive charges, and the arrow in the pictograph stand-
ing for magnetic dipole moment is that of the equivalent
positive stationary electric current circulating around the
indicated axis.
¯
11examples
σ1 1 G.G,T.T,P.P,M.M,P, mass, charge
ǫ1 1 P.G,T.M
τ11M.G,T.P, time
µ11T.G,M.P, magnetic monopole
TABLE IV: Four scalar types[4] specified according to their
invariance under space-inversion and time-reversal operations
(time-even scalar σ, time-even pseudoscalar ǫ, time-odd scalar
τand time-odd pseudoscalar µ).
Another set of conventions is needed to facilitate the
algebraic representation of such quantities. Typically, a
polar vector is represented by three coordinates defined
by its scalar-product projections to an oriented set of
three orthonormal basis vectors. It is so practical that
we tend to represent all other quantities in a similar way.
In case of ”true” vector quantities (those of Table I),
such algebraic representation is usually defined through
the time derivatives and vectorial products or equiva-
lent rules. In fact, this representation justify the com-
mon usage of the simple P-arrow pictograph for all other
vector quantities of the Table I. For example, magnetic
moment mof a current turn is defined as a vector per-
pendicular to the turn and directed so that the current
observed from the end of vector menvelops the turn
counterclockwise.[40] Therefore, the pictograph for M(as
well as for Gand T) can be formally replaced by that of
P, even though these quantities actually do have a dif-
ferent symmetry (in fact, Fig. 1 could conveniently serve
as the replacement table). Moreover, this algebraic rep-
resentation allows to calculate any scalar and vectorial
products in the usual way. Interestingly, vectorial prod-
ucts of true vectors are true vectors and scalar products of
true vectors transforms as one of the four possible scalar
species[4] (time-even scalar σ, time-even pseudoscalar ǫ,
time-odd scalar τand time-odd pseudoscalar µ, see Ta-
ble IV).
In case of bi-directors, none of the SO(3) operations
can reverse their geometrical sign. It indicates the fun-
damental difficulty with representation of bi-directors by
three-component algebraic vectors. In fact, each of these
bi-director quantities transforms as an ”antitandem” ar-
rangement of two vectors - as a couple (”dipole”) of two
opposite vectors X1and X2(|X1|=|X2|) arranged on
a common axis at some nonzero distance r21 =r2r1.
Obviously, Ntransforms as an antitandem of two Pvec-
tors, Cas a antitandem of two Gvectors, Las a Tvec-
tor antitandem, Fas a Mvector antitandem. Therefore,
a bi-director can be represented by a simple ”two-body”
term a12 =X2X1. Here it is assumed that the symme-
try operations act both on the vectors and their position
- operations that change r21 to the opposite are actually
interchanging the sites 1 and 2. The geometrical par-
ity sign of such antitandem quantities could be denoted
as inward or outward, depending whether the vector X2
is parallel or antiparallel to the vector r21 , and so its
4
G
P M T
N
C
L
F
FIG. 2: Pictographs of same 8 kinds of quantities as in Fig. 1,
but with an opposite sense.
evaluation actually requires to know two quantities at a
time, X2and r21. Having this in mind, a range of alge-
braic operations can be nevertheless easily extended to
all the above vectors and bi-directors. For the sake of
convenience, types of the quantities obtained as vectorial
cross products or as multiplication by a scalar are given
in Table V. Let us also note that from symmetry point of
view, time derivative acts here as multiplication by the
time-odd scalar τ, so that e.g. the time derivative of the
bi-director Ltransforms as the bi-director Nand vice
versa.
Classification of axes and concluding remarks.
In general, a physical object may have a physical property
transforming as one the 8 discussed cases only if its sym-
metry invariance group is a subgroup of the correspond-
ing limiting group. For example, macroscopic magneti-
zation can exist only in crystals belonging to 31 different
Heesch-Shubnikov point groups, that are subgroups of
/mmgroup.[3, 39, 41] If the axis of the limiting su-
pergroup coincides with the symmetry axis of the object,
it is often named according to the associated property
(ferromagnetic axis, polar axis). Other axes could be
similarly labeled as toroidal, truly-chiral, falsely-chiral,
G-axis, fully-symmetric and so on.
The term vector is sometimes employed to describe
phenomena that have a bi-director symmetry. For ex-
ample, so-called Burgers vector is widely used to char-
acterize screw dislocations, which are obviously non-
polar, truly chiral (C-type) objects. Similarly, the an-
tiferromagnetic vector[31–33] is often used to describe
the falsely-chiral (F-type) antiferroelectric order. On
the contrary, the so-called ”chiral vector” or ”vector
chirality”[42–44] is sometimes used to characterize cyclic
spin arrangements on spin loops, for example in triangu-
lar antiferromagnetic lattices, even if the spin arrange-
ment happens to have toroidal symmetry, which is ”uni-
directorial” but achiral (similarly as spin cycloids and
eel domain walls [45]).
Finally, it is well known that axial vector Gcan be rep-
resented as a polar antisymmetric second-order tensor.
The bi-director quantities can be also classified within
the established tensorial calculus.[1, 4, 46, 47] They cor-
respond to a special kind of second rank tensors, that has
been once coined in Russian literature as the ”simplest
tensor” (i.e. symmetrical second rank tensor having in
its canonical form only a single nonzero element).[8] In
AG P M T N C L F
[G×A] or [σA]G P M T N C L F
[P×A] or [ǫA]P G T M C N F L
[M×A] or [τA]M T G P L F N C
[T×A] or [µA]T M P G F L C N
TABLE V: Look-up table of transformation properties of vec-
torial products and scalar multiplications. The symbol has
a meaning of ”transforms as...”, the operations involving bi-
director quantities N,C,L,Fare defined in the text.
particular, N-type bi-director could be considered as dual
to the simplest time-even polar tensor, C-type bi-director
transforms as the simplest time-even axial tensor, L-type
bi-director as the simplest time-odd polar tensor and F-
type bi-director as the simplest time-odd axial tensor.
Nevertheless, we think that the unifying classification
via irreducible representations of /m.1still provides
a very practical concept, applicable in various areas of
physics. In solid state physics at least, the simple per-
spective where vectors and bi-directors have equal le-
gitimacy might be useful when dealing with problems
where several such quantities are interacting, for classifi-
cation of long-wavelength excitations or structural com-
ponents of magnetoelectric multiferroic crystals[11, 48–
50], for description of macroscopic properties of chiral
objects,[51, 52] or for classification of topological defects
like domain walls, magnetic vortices or skyrmions.[53] In
fact, we would like to offer a more complete discussion of
possible applications of this concept in future and so we
would be grateful to learn about other cases where this
perspective could bring some useful insight.
Acknowledgments
It is a real pleasure to acknowledge V´aclav Janovec for
his valuable suggestions related to this work, financially
supported by the Czech Science Foundation (Project
GACR 13-15110S).
[1] R. R. Birss, Symmetry and Magnetism (North-Holland,
Amsterdam, 1964).
[2] H. Grimmer, Ferroelectrics 161, 181 (1994).
[3] E. Ascher, Int. J. Magnetism 5, 287 (1974).
[4] V. Kopsk´y, Z. Krystallogr. 221, 51 (2006).
[5] Yu. Sirotin and M. P. Shaskolskaya, Osnovy Kristallo-
phiziki (In Russian, Moscow: Nauka, 1975); [Engl. transl:
Fundamentals of Crystal Physics (Moscow: Mir. 1982)].
5
[6] M. Hamermesh, Group Theory And its Applications
to Physical Problems (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA,
1964).
[7] D. B. Litvin, Acta Cryst. A64, 316 (2007).
[8] I. S. Zheludev, Fizika kristallov i simmetria (Nauka,
Moscow, 1987).
[9] I. S. Zheludev, Acta Cryst. A42, 122 (1986).
[10] V. M. Dubovik, S. S. Krotov, and V. V. Tugushev,
Kristallografiya 32, 540 (1987).
[11] H. Schmid, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 434201 (2008).
[12] S. L. Altmann and P. Herzig, Point-Group Theory Tables
(Oxford University Press, New York 1994).
[13] A. P. Cracknell, Rep. Prog. Phys. 32, 633 (1969).
[14] W. Slawinski, R. Przenioslo, I. Sosnowska and V. Pet-
ricek, Acta Cryst. B 68, 240 (2012).
[15] J. M. Perez-Mato, J. L. Ribeiro, V. Petricek and M. I.
Aroyo, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24 163201 (2012).
[16] H. T. Stokes, D. M. Hatch, and B. J. Campbell,
ISOTROPY program package Version 9.0, Department
of Physics and Astronomy, Bringham Young University,
Provo, USA (2007).
[17] C. Ederer and N. A. Spaldin, Phys. Rev. B 76, 214404
(2007).
[18] A. A. Gorbatsevich and Yu. V. Kopaev, Ferroelectrics
161, 321 (1994).
[19] N. A. Spaldin, M. Fiebig, and M. Mostovoy, J. Phys.:
Condens. Matter 20, 434203 (2008).
[20] V. M. Dubovik and V. V. Tugushev, Physics Reports
187, 145 (1990).
[21] Yu. V. Kopaev, Physics-Uspekhi 52, 1111 (2009).
[22] S. Prosandeev, I. Ponomareva, I. Kornev, I. Naumov, and
L. Bellaiche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 237601 (2006).
[23] S. Prosandeev, A. R. Akbarzadeh and L. Bellaiche, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 102, 257601 (2009).
[24] S. Prosandeev and L. Bellaiche, J. Mater. Sci. 44, 5235
(2009).
[25] A. A. Gorbatsevich and Yu. V. Kopaev, JETP 39, 684
(1984).
[26] P. Toledano, D. D. Khalyavin and L. C. Chapon, Phys.
Rev. B 84, 094421 (2011).
[27] R. D. Johnson, L. C. Chapon, D. D. Khalyavin, P.
Manuel, P. G. Radaelli, and C. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett.
108, 067201 (2012).
[28] M. Mostovoy, Physics 5, 16 (2012).
[29] A. J. Hearmon, F. Fabrizi, L. C. Chapon, R. D. Johnson,
D. Prabhakaran, S. V. Streltsov, P. J. Brown, and P. G.
Radaelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 237201 (2012).
[30] L. D. Barron, Molecular Light Scattering and Optical Ac-
tivity (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004).
[31] A. M. Kadomtseva, A. K. Zvezdin, Yu. F. Popov, A.
P. Pyatakov, and G. P. Vorobev, JETP Letters 79, 571
(2004).
[32] P. Tol´edano, Ferroelectrics 161, 257 (1994).
[33] C. Ederer and N. A. Spaldin, Phys. Rev. B 71, 060401
(2005).
[34] L. D. Barron, Nature 405, 895 (2000).
[35] S. T. Lagerwall, Ferroelectric and Antiferroelectric Liquid
Crystals (Wiley-VCH, 1999).
[36] A. E. Romanov and V. I. Vladimirov, Phys. Stat. Sol. (a)
78, 11 (1983).
[37] H. Kleinert, Multivalued Fields in Condensed Matter,
Electromagnetism, and Gravitation (World Scientific,
Singapore, 2008), Chap. 9.
[38] F. C. Frank, Discuss. Faraday Soc. 5, 19 (1958).
[39] T. S. G. Krishnamurty and P. Gopalakrishnamurty, Acta
Cryst. A25, 333 (1969).
[40] G. E. Zilberman, Electricity and Magnetism, (Moscow:
Mir Publ., 1973).
[41] W. Opechowski, Crystallographic and Metacrystallo-
graphic Groups (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986).
[42] H. Kawamura, J. Appl. Phys. 63, 3086 (1988).
[43] D. Grohol, K. Matan, J.-H. Cho, S.-H. Lee, J. W. Lynn,
D. G. Nocera, and Y. S. Lee, Nature Materials 4, 323
(2005).
[44] K. Matan, B. M. Bartlett, J. S. Helton, V. Sikolenko, S.
Matas, K. Prokes, Y. Chen, J. W. Lynn, D. Grohol, T. J.
Sato, M. Tokunaga, D. G. Nocera, and Y. S. Lee, Phys.
Rev. B 83, 214406 (2011).
[45] B. M. Tanygin, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Ma-
terials 323, 616 (2011).
[46] D. B. Litvin, Acta Cryst. A50, 406 (1994).
[47] V. Kopsk´y, Acta Cryst. A35, 95 (1979).
[48] M. Fiebig, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38, R123 (2005).
[49] A. Saxena and T. Lookman, Phase Transitions 84, 421
(2011).
[50] A. B. Harris, Phys. Rev. B 76, 054447 (2007).
[51] P. Jungwirth, L. Sk´ala, and R. Zahradn´ık, Chemical
Physics Letters 161, 502 (1989).
[52] V. Gopalan and D. B. Litvin, Nature Materials 10, 376
(2011).
[53] B. M. Tanygin, Physica B 407, 866 (2012).
... 19. Character table of the point group ∞/mm1' point group from Ref. [340]. Here N, G, P and C represent the time-even nematic, axial, polar and chiral orders respectively. ...
... While neither is necessarily by itself chiral, assuming for example a polar vortex P(r) such that ∇ × P ̸ =0, the dot product P(r) · (∇ × P(r)) represents a local three-dimensional formulation of G 0 , albeit not a unique one. While the specific formulation of a chiral order parameter depends on the problem under consideration and may change upon the context (with the sole requirement of being zero in space groups possessing improper symmetry operations), the possibility of a spontaneous transition from a nonchiral reference phase to a chiral state has been elucidated in several recent works [291,340,341]. In particular and with reference to the work of Hlinka [340], it is easy to spot that the chiral representation can be obtained as the product between the polar and the axial representations as also highlighted in the character table 19. ...
... While the specific formulation of a chiral order parameter depends on the problem under consideration and may change upon the context (with the sole requirement of being zero in space groups possessing improper symmetry operations), the possibility of a spontaneous transition from a nonchiral reference phase to a chiral state has been elucidated in several recent works [291,340,341]. In particular and with reference to the work of Hlinka [340], it is easy to spot that the chiral representation can be obtained as the product between the polar and the axial representations as also highlighted in the character table 19. This detail is crucial to define a so called enantioselective effect, namely an interaction between a chiral material and an external parameter cabable of removing the degeneracy between states equidistant from a nonchiral reference but with opposite handedness. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Chirality refers to the asymmetry of objects that cannot be superimposed on their mirror image. It is a concept that exists in various scientific fields and has profound consequences. Although these are perhaps most widely recognized within biology, chemistry, and pharmacology, recent advances in chiral phonons, topological systems, crystal enantiomorphic materials, and magneto-chiral materials have brought this topic to the forefront of condensed matter physics research. Our review discusses the symmetry requirements and the features associated with structural chirality in inorganic materials. This allows us to explore the nature of phase transitions in these systems, the coupling between order parameters, and their impact on the material's physical properties. We highlight essential contributions to the field, particularly recent progress in the study of chiral phonons, altermagnetism, magnetochirality between others. Despite the rarity of naturally occurring inorganic chiral crystals, this review also highlights a significant knowledge gap, presenting challenges and opportunities for structural chirality mostly at the fundamental level, e.g., chiral displacive phase transitions and ferrochirality, possibilities of tuning and switching structural chirality by external means (electric, magnetic, or strain fields), whether chirality could be an independent order parameter, and whether structural chirality could be quantified, etc. Beyond simply summarising this field of research, this review aims to inspire further research in materials science by addressing future challenges, encouraging the exploration of chirality beyond traditional boundaries, and seeking the development of innovative materials with superior or new properties.
... See also Refs. [46][47][48][49][50] for related work on axial point groups. ...
... It is only invariant under continuous cyclic groups G c∞ , including C ∞ ×C i×θ , that do not distinguish between tensor components T ++ u0 and T ++ g0 . We note that all tensor components T ss ′ ℓm are unambiguously defined via the IRs of the spherical group R i×θ , even though discussing these tensor components in conjunction with smaller groups like C i×θ [31,68] and cyclic or dihedral groups [47] can be instructive. ...
... Refs. [47] and [50]. To ease cross-referencing between these works and ours, we provide Table XVII This Appendix provides explicit details about which spherical tensors T ss ′ ℓ are permitted by the 122 crystallographic magnetic point groups. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
We present a general, systematic theory of electromagnetism and chirality in crystalline solids. Symmetry is its fundamental guiding principle. We use the formal similarity between space inversion $i$ and time inversion $\theta$ to identify two complementary, comprehensive classification of crystals, based on five categories of electric and magnetic multipole order -- called polarizations -- and five categories of chirality. The five categories of polarizations (parapolar, electropolar, magnetopolar, antimagnetopolar, and multipolar) expand the familiar notion of electric dipolarization in ferroelectrics and magnetization in ferromagnets to higher-order multipole densities. The five categories of chirality (parachiral, electrochiral, magnetochiral, antimagnetochiral, and multichiral) expand the familiar notion of enantiomorphism due to non-superposable mirror images to the inversion symmetries $i$, $\theta$, and $i\theta$. In multichiral systems, all these inversion symmetries are absent so that these systems have four distinct enantiomorphs. Each category of chirality arises from distinct superpositions of electric and magnetic multipole densities. We provide a complete theory of minimal effective models characterizing the different categories of chirality in different systems. Jointly these two schemes yield a classification of all 122 magnetic crystallographic point groups into 15 types that treat the inversion symmetries $i$, $\theta$, and $i\theta$ on the same footing. The group types are characterized via distinct physical properties and characteristic features in the electronic band structure. At the same time, the formal similarities between the inversion symmetries $i$, $\theta$, and $i\theta$ imply striking correspondences between apparently dissimilar systems and their physical properties.
... According to Hlinka, chirality can arise from the interaction of a vector V with a rotational mode R, forming an axial vector. Although these distortions, when considered separately, might be achiral, their coupling can lead to the emergence of chiral distortions [15]. These vector and rotation modes can be achieved in our model by the distortions schematized in Fig. 1. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
We compare the various chirality measures most widely used in the literature to quantify chiral symmetry in extended solids, i.e., the continuous chirality measure, the Hausdorff distance, and the angular momentum. By studying these functions in an algebraically tractable case, we can evaluate their strengths and weaknesses when applied to more complex crystals. Going beyond those classical calculations, we propose a new method to quantify the handedness of a crystal based on a pseudoscalar function, i.e., the helicity. This quantity, borrowed from hydrodynamics, can be computed from the eigenvector carrying the system from the high-symmetry non-chiral phase to the low-symmetry chiral phase. Different model systems like K$_3$NiO$_2$, CsCuCl$_3$ and MgTi$_2$O$_4$ are used as test cases where we show the superior interest of using helicity to quantify chirality together with the handedness distinction.
... While the concept of spontaneous symmetry breaking has so far been a fertile ground for important discoveries in condensed matter physics [13], with phenomena such as ferroelectricity, magnetism, or superconductivity, to date, it has not been applied to study the possibility of chirality spontaneously emerging from an achiral inorganic solid phase. Nevertheless, a chiral irreducible representation (IRREP) or order parameter can be formally defined [14], so that a group-subgroup relationship of the type achiral → chiral between two phases is a physical possibility [15]. Despite the recent experimental reports about the spontaneous formation of gyrotropic domains observed in certain materials [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] below a critical temperature, many questions remain to be answered about their physical origin and properties. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
We demonstrate from first-principles calculations applied to the K$_{3}$NiO$_{2}$ crystal that a structural phase transition from an achiral to a chiral phase can be mediated by a soft zone boundary phonon and that it can be controlled by pressure and epitaxial strain. Calculations in the presence of an electric field hint at a rich physics dominated by the competition between chirality, polar, and achiral distortions. Induced by the interaction between chiral, polar, and axial phonons, an optimal parameter window for the permanent reversal of chirality is observed.
... 43 Similar arguments also hold for anisotropic components of higher-rank multipoles. We show the parities of four monopoles (Q 0 , M 0 , T 0 , G 0 ) and dipoles (Q, M, T, G) in terms of the P and T as well as mirror operations parallel (perpendicular) to the dipole vector, M (M), in Table I. 48 Note that there is no distinction between M and M for (pseudo)scalar quantity. From Table I, one finds that the ETM G 0 is the only multipole degree of freedom with the same symmetry as chirality, indicating that the ETM becomes a microscopic indicator for chirality. ...
Article
Full-text available
Chirality ubiquitously appears in nature; however, its quantification remains obscure owing to the lack of microscopic description at the quantum-mechanical level. We propose a way of evaluating chirality in terms of the electric toroidal monopole, a practical entity of time-reversal even pseudoscalar (parity-odd) objects reflecting relevant electronic wave functions. For this purpose, we analyze a twisted methane molecule at the quantum-mechanical level, showing that the electric toroidal monopoles become a quantitative indicator for chirality. In the twisted methane, we clarify that the handedness of chirality corresponds to the sign of the expectation value of the electric toroidal monopole and that the most important ingredient is the modulation of the spin-dependent imaginary hopping between the hydrogen atoms, while the relativistic spin–orbit coupling within the carbon atom is irrelevant for chirality.
Article
Magnetic anisotropy is one of the important factors in determining magnetic structures. The type of magnetic anisotropy is closely related to the symmetry of crystals. We theoretically investigate magnetic anisotropy and its related magnetic instability arising from an electric axial moment, which appears under the breaking of the mirror symmetry parallel to the moment but does not require the breakings of both spatial inversion and time-reversal symmetries. By performing perturbation and mean-field calculations in a complementary way, we show the appearance of the in-plane magnetic anisotropy when the electric axial moment occurs, which tends to tilt in-plane spin moments from the crystal axes in collaboration with relativistic spin-orbit coupling. We demonstrate such a tendency for single-sublattice and four-site cluster models. In the four-site cluster model, we show that a spin configuration consisting of magnetic monopole and magnetic toroidal dipole tends to be realized in the region where a spin vortex is stabilized by the exchange interactions.
Article
We propose emergent time-reversal switching responses in antiferromagnets, which are triggered by an accompanying magnetic toroidal monopole, i.e., a time-reversal odd scalar distinct from electric and magnetic monopoles. We show that simple collinear antiferromagnets exhibit unconventional responses to external electric and/or magnetic fields once magnetic symmetry accommodates the magnetic toroidal monopole. We specifically demonstrate that the emergence of the magnetic toroidal monopole in antiferromagnets enables us to control rotational distortion by an external magnetic field, switch vortex-type antiferromagnetic structure by an external electric field, and convert right-handedness/left-handedness in chirality by a composite electromagnetic field. We also present the symmetry conditions to induce the magnetic toroidal monopole and exhibit candidate materials including noncollinear antiferromagnets in order to stimulate experimental observations.
Article
We theoretically investigate electronic orderings with the electric axial moment without breakings of both spatial inversion and time-reversal symmetries in the zigzag-chain system. Specifically, we elucidate the role of the local odd-parity hybridization arising from locally noncentrosymmetric lattice structures based on symmetry and microscopic model analyses. We show that the odd-parity crystalline electric field gives rise to an effective cross-product coupling between the electric dipole and electric toroidal dipole, the latter of which corresponds to the electric axial moment. As a result, the staggered component of the electric axial moment is induced by applying an external electric field, while its uniform component is induced via the appearance of staggered electric dipole ordering. We also show that uniform electric quadrupole ordering accompanies uniform electric axial moment. Furthermore, we discuss transverse magnetization as a consequence of the orderings with the uniform electric axial moment. Our results extend the scope of materials exhibiting electric axial ordering to those with locally noncentrosymmetric lattice structures.
Article
Full-text available
Human's exploration of space has changed over time, depending on the expansion of the limits of his knowledge. Space is infinite, but it is limited by the possibility of human knowledge. The original man knew very little about the space in which he lived - about its shape, size, content, etc. Over time, the space began to take on the shapes that describe it. Those forms are its dimensions, which increased as knowledge about space in-creased. Knowledge spread more and more, from the Earth's surface to deep into the cosmos. Time is known to everyone, but it is difficult to define and understand. Science, philosophy, religion, art have different definitions of time, but it can be defined as measuring the progress of events. Space-time convergence explores the changing relationship between space and time. Today it is used to interpret the impact of technological progress on current world processes, especially globalization. The development of computer technology and virtual reality techniques has led to numerous changes in the representation of space. Since the initial development of computer technology, human has tried to create a virtual image of the world that he could experience with all his senses in the same way as the image of the "real" world. GIS displays data in a visual, simple and user-friendly form. The ability to transform spatial data into relevant information represents its basic value and advantage.
Book
Using classical and quantum methods with a strong emphasis on symmetry principles, this book, a reissue of the 2004 second edition, develops the theory of a variety of optical activity and related phenomena from the perspective of molecular scattering of polarised light. In addition to the traditional topic of optical rotation and circular dichroism in the visible and near-ultraviolet associated with electronic transitions, the newer topic of optical activity associated with vibrational transitions, which may be studied using both infrared and Raman techniques, is also treated. Ranging from the physics of elementary particles to the structure of viruses, the subject matter of the book reflects the importance of optical activity and chirality in much of modern science and will be of interest to a wide range of physical and life scientists.
Book
This book lays the foundations of the theory of fluctuating multivalued fields with numerous applications. Most prominent among these are phenomena dominated by the statistical mechanics of line-like objects, such as the phase transitions in superfluids and superconductors as well as the melting process of crystals, and the electromagnetic potential as a multivalued field that can produce a condensate of magnetic monopoles. In addition, multivalued mappings play a crucial role in deriving the physical laws of matter coupled to gauge fields and gravity with torsion from the laws of free matter. Through careful analysis of each of these applications, the book thus provides students and researchers with supplementary reading material for graduate courses on phase transitions, quantum field theory, gravitational physics, and differential geometry. © 2008 by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved.
Article
This chapter presents the formulation and comparison of the definitions associated with various metacrystallographic groups by the application of mathematical terminology. The terminology is much less picturesque than that used by most crystallographers, but it has the advantage of bringing out the analogies and differences between these groups. The chapter also provides an overview on spin arrangements and magnetic groups. In a classical model, the atoms of a crystal in a magnetically ordered state have, even in the absence of an external magnetic field, nonvanishing magnetic dipole moments which, in the simplest case, are of equal magnitudes but possibly of different orientations. Although this model is, even from the classical point of view, too primitive for many purposes, it is sufficient for introducing magnetic groups and spin groups.
Article
A general theory of curvature-elasticity in the molecularly uniaxial liquid crystals, similar to that of Oseen, is established on a revised basis. There are certain significant differences: in particular one of his coefficients is shown to be zero in the classical liquid crystals. Another, which he did not recognize, does not interfere with the determination of the three principal coefficients. The way is therefore open for exact experimental determination of these coefficients, giving unusually direct information regarding the mutual orienting effect of molecules.
Article
Transformation properties of tensors under the action of the full magnetic group SO(3) ⊗ E 0 are specified by the intrinsic symmetry which defines how the tensor transforms under the action of the proper rotation group SO(3) and by their parity which defines how the tensor transforms under the action of the group of inversions E 0 = {e, i, e′, i′}, where i denotes the space inversion, e′ the magnetic inversion and i′ = i.e′ their combination. There exist therefore four types of tensors to each intrinsic symmetry whose transformation properties under the group SO(3) are identical while their transformation under the group E 0 determines their parities with respect to the three inversions. As a result of this separation, transformation properties of tensors of the same intrinsic symmetry under the action of magnetic groups of the same oriented Laue class are strongly correlated by relations for which we propose the name Opechowski's magic relations in homage to late Prof. Opechowski. The origin of these relations is explained and tables which describe them are presented. It is found, in particular, that the number of different forms of tensor decompositions under the action of groups of oriented Laue class of magnetic point groups equals the number of one-dimensional real irreducible representations of the proper rotation group which generates the Laue class. Accordingly, there exists also the same number of allowed forms of tensors which do not vanish.
Article
Using the method of construction of the magnetic symmetry groups already developed by the authors, the magnetic symmetry groups associated with the limiting groups have been derived. The number of constants required to describe the three magnetic properties studied for each one of the derived magnetic symmetry groups is also enumerated.