Content uploaded by Dornadula Chandrasekharam
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Dornadula Chandrasekharam on Nov 17, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Geothermal Conference, Reykjavík, Sept. 2003 Session #4
Geothermal resource potential of Himachal Pradesh,
India
Dornadula Chandrasekharam1), Mohammad Ayaz Alam1) and Angelo
Minissale2)
1) Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India
2) Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Florence, Italy
E-mail: dchandra@geos.iitb.ac.in, ayaz@geos.iitb.ac.in, minissa@csmga.fi.cnr.it
Abstract
Himachal Pradesh Geothermal sub-provinces (HPG) form a part of the large Himalaya
Geothermal Province, which covers an area of over 1500 sq km enclosing more than 150
thermal manifestations, with surface temperatures varying between 57 and 97°C. High
geothermal gradients (>260°C/km) and high heat flow values (>180 mW/m2) are
characteristic of HPG. Besides wet geothermal systems, the province is endowed with
hot dry rocks at shallow depths. With such high geothermal gradients and heat flow
values, HPG is well suited to commission geothermal based power projects and also to
initiate feasibility study to tap hot dry rock resources. HPG geothermal resources can
immediately be utilised to support several food processing industries and capture the
entire fruit market of the country as well as that of the world.
Keywords: Himalaya Geothermal Province, hot dry rock, geothermal power,
geothermal energy, food processing.
1 Introduction
The Himalaya Geothermal Province extends from northwestern part of India (Ladakh)
to its northeastern part (Assam) covering an area greater than 1500 sq km and
encloses over 150 thermal manifestations. They fall between the Main Boundary
Thrust (MBT) and Indo-Tsangpo Suture Zone (ITSZ), which are parallel to the Indo-
Asia collision zone. Himachal Pradesh geothermal sub-provinces form a part of this
large Himalaya Geothermal Province. Thermal manifestations around Puga, Parbati
and Kullu valleys are known for their high temperatures. Several workers (Sehgal
1963; Jangi et al., 1976; Gupta et al., 1976; Giggenbach et al., 1983; GSI, 1991;
Alam, 2002) have carried out preliminary investigations in these areas. Recently, as a
part of Indo-Italian collaborative research programme, detailed investigation on the
thermal waters and thermal gases from thermal manifestation along Parbati and Kullu
valleys have been carried out to understand the geochemical evolution of the thermal
waters and gases and assess the geothermal potential of these sub-provinces. The
results of this investigation will appear elsewhere. In the present paper, the
geothermal resources potential of Himachal Pradesh geothermal sub-provinces (HPG)
is discussed. Thermal manifestations occurring at Tattapani, Puga, Beas, Parbati,
Sutluj, Bhagirathi and Alaknanda constitute these sub-provinces (Chandrasekharam,
2001a). The heat source available in these sub-provinces is best suited for developing
power projects as well as for direct utilization (Chandrasekharam, 2001a). Further,
these provinces are also best suited for initiating a hot dry rock feasibility study
(Chandrasekharam, 2001b; 2002).
S04 Paper046 Page 15
International Geothermal Conference, Reykjavík, Sept. 2003 Session #4
2 General Geology of HPG
HPG falls between the MBT and ITSZ (Figure1) located at an altitude extending
between 1160 and 3660 m above mean sea level (Jangi et al., 1976). The temperature
in summer varies between 27 and 14°C and winters are severe with snowfall varying
between 60 cm and 2 m. The annual rainfall is about 120 cm (Srikantia and Bhargava,
1998).
Indus Tsango Suture Zone (I T S Z)
Main Central Thrust (M C T)
Main Boundary Thrust (M B T)
International Boundary
Thermal Springs
I N D I A
Gori River
Ganga River
Sutluj River
I T S Z
M B T
M C T
Manikaran
Puga
Shimla
Tattapani
30°
35°
75° 80° 85°
80°
25°
30°
35°
C H I N A
Nan
g
a Parbat
Zanskar
Figure 1. Geothermal manifestations in northwestern part of Himalayas.
The Manikaran Quartzite intercalated with phyllite constitutes the upper most
Formation of the Rampur Group (Srikantia and Bhargava, 1998). Schist and gneiss of
the Kullu Formation of the Chail Group tectonically overlies the Manikaran Quartzite
(Sinha et al., 1997). The Manikaran Quartzite is underlain by metabasics, grey and
green phyllite, with bands of carbonaceous schist (Jangi et al., 1976). The Manikaran
Quartzite is highly jointed (shear joints with joint spacing of about 3-5 cm) and the
contact between the quartzite and phyllite represents a thrust. The thrust zone is
marked by tightly folded schist, which are highly crushed and at places been
transformed into high-grade gneiss containing garnet. At places carbonaceous schist
and graphite lenses are seen along this thrust. Folding pattern in these rocks is
intricate and complex. The phillyte shows drag and overturned folds and puckering
with the drag fold axes trending N-S and NE-SW and overturned folds axes trending
N-S and E-W. The regional dip of the Manikaran Quartzite is NE with dip amount
S04 Paper046 Page 16
International Geothermal Conference, Reykjavík, Sept. 2003 Session #4
ranging from 30 to 50°. These joints are of great significance since all of them are the
channels for upraising thermal waters and thermal gases in the region.
3 Geothermal manifestations and heat source in HPG
HPG experiences high geothermal gradient, reaching values as high as 260°C/km and
high heat flow values of 70 - >180 mW/m2 (Ravi Shanker, 1988). The surface
temperature of the thermal springs varies from 57 to 98°C (GSI, 1991; Alam, 2002)
and at some places (e.g. Manikaran) steam emergence is commonly seen. Recent
investigation on thermal waters from Manikaran in Parbati valley (Alam, 2002) shows
that the thermal waters issuing here can be considered as a mixture of two end
members, one represented by paleo-brine rich in Na-Cl and the other represented by
calcium carbonate rich water produced by the interaction of meteoric water with
calcite veins traversing the lithological formation. The estimated reservoir
temperatures (Na-K thermometry) vary from 260°C (GSI, 1991) and 310°C (Alam,
2002). Thermal water flow rates measured from the shallow exploration bore-wells,
drilled by the Geological Survey of India, varies from 200 l/m to more than 1000 l/m
(GSI, 1991).
Besides subduction tectonic regime, high heat flow and geothermal gradients
in this region is due to younger shallow magmatic activity within MBT and ITSZ.
This younger magmatic activity is represented by large number of granite intrusive,
whose age vary from 60 to 5.3 Ma (Schneider et al., 1999a,b; Searle, 1999a,b; Le Fort
and Rai, 1999; Haris et al., 2000; Harrison et al., 1998, 1999; Chandrasekharam,
2001b; 2002). These granites occurring as lopoliths, sheets and dykes (leuco-
granites), with thickness varying from a few meters to several meters, are either
exposed on the surface or covered by a layer of sedimentary formation. Permian
granite of 268 Ma also occurs in the western Zanskar (Noble et al., 2001).
International Deep Profiling of Tibet and the Himalayas (INDEPTH) project
located ‘seismic bright spots’ in Tibet region (east of HPG), which are attributed to
the presence of magmatic melts and or saline fluids within the crust (Makovsky and
Klemperer, 1999). Highly saline fluids are also found in Ladakh granite (~60 Ma) as
inclusions, which are attributed to the high volatile content in the granitic melts
(Sachan, 1996). Though INDEPTH investigation has not been carried out, considering
the proximity of INDEPTH site in Tibet, probability of occurrence of such seismic
bright spots within the HPG is high. This inference gains strength from the 1 Ma
anatexis process recognized in Nanga Parbat (Fig.1; Chichi Granite Massive) in
Pakistan Himalayas (Schneider et al., 1999c). Similar processes must be in operation
on the eastern side of Nanga Parbat also. These evidences confirm that the present day
observed high heat flow value (>100 mW/m2) and geothermal gradient is related to
subduction tectonic related crustal melting process at shallow depth.
4 Regional Stresses in HPG
Regional stress analysis based on earthquake focal mechanism, bore-hole blow-outs
and hydro-fracturing (Gowd et al., 1992) indicates that the entire Himalayan belt in
general and the HPG in particular, is under compressive stress regime due to the
northward movement of the Indian plate and net resistive forces at the Himalayan
collision zone. Thus, the central and northern India including Nepal, the Greater
Himalayas and Pakistan fall under this stress province characterized by NNE-ENE
oriented SHmax (Chandrasekharam, 2001b; 2002). Investigation carried out around
Zanskar (north of HPG) by Pierre Dèzes (1999) also shows compressive regime in
S04 Paper046 Page 17
International Geothermal Conference, Reykjavík, Sept. 2003 Session #4
this region. Compressional stress regime is favourable to create several sub-horizontal
reservoirs in granites by hydro fracturing, interconnected by boreholes (Baria et al.,
1999; Wyborn, 2001). Thus the entire subduction tectonic regime along the
Himalayan Geothermal Province appears to be similar to HDR (Hot Dry Rock)
prospect of Hijiori and Kansai provinces of Japan. International HDR feasibility study
can be initiated in the region falling between MBT and ITSZ with local government
support and support from the independent power producers to develop a geothermal
power project.
5 Geothermal energy utilization in HPG
HPG, being a region with high altitudes and rugged mountain topography, it is not
possible to transmit power to remote villages by conventional coal or hydropower
grid. Though local government has installed transmission cables to remote villages,
power supply has not been commissioned even after several years and the rural
population are still using conventional lanterns to meet their power requirement. With
the existing geothermal resources and available technology, it should be possible to
generate power, which can provide at least one electric bulb in every home in these
villages! In regions like Puga, which is covered by snow and ice throughout the year,
geothermal heat will benefit to a large extent to the army personal. Thus besides
power, direct utilization of geothermal energy (e.g. space-heating and greenhouse;
Lund, 2002) will be more beneficial and economical in these regions.
HPG have varied agro-climatic conditions suitable for growing different
varieties of fruits. This region is successfully growing apple, pear, peach, plum,
almond, walnut, citrus, mango, raisin grapes etc. The total area under fruit cultivation
in Himachal Pradesh (HP) alone is about 2000 km2 with a production of about 5000
MT of all kinds of fruits annually. Apple is the major fruit accounting for more than
40% of total area under fruit cultivation and about 88% of total fruit production in HP.
The present two fruit processing plants in HP has a combined capacity to process
about 20,000 MT of fruit every year. But, then the region has to import other food
products from other parts of the country. If local geothermal resources are put to use,
this region can be one of the major food producing and processing regions in the
country (Chandrasekharam, 2001a; 2002).
Greenhouses, dehydration of fruits and vegetables and aquaculture (fish
farming) are the three primary uses of geothermal energy in the agribusiness industry
(Lund, 2002), which are most suited under the existing Indian conditions. The
relatively rural location of most geothermal resources in India also offers advantages,
including clean air, few disease problems, clean water, a stable workforce, and low
taxes. The HGP is best suited to initiate state-of art technology in food processing
(dehydration and greenhouse cultivation) using geothermal energy. Beside the agro-
based industry, large cold storage facilities can be commissioned along the west coast
geothermal province where fishing is a major business.
6 Conclusions
The existing data on the geothermal resources on HPG indicates that both power and
direct applications are possible over the entire area of the Himalaya Geothermal
Province. Using locally available geothermal resources enable to adopt Clean
Development Mechanism and reduce dependency on conventional power sources and
also mitigate global climate change. When Yangbajing geothermal field in China,
located north of ITSZ and east of HPG is able to produce 25MW of power
(Chandrasekharam, 2000), considering similar tectonic setting, the HPG should also
S04 Paper046 Page 18
International Geothermal Conference, Reykjavík, Sept. 2003 Session #4
be in a position to produce similar amount of power thereby improving the socio-
economic status of the local hill population.
7 References
Alam, A.M. (2002). Hydrogeochemistry of thermal springs in Manikaran, Kullu
District, Himachal Pradesh (India). M.Sc. Dissertation (unpublished), IIT Bombay,
105 pp.
Baria, R., Baumgartner, J., Rummel, F., Pine, R.J. and Sato, Y. (1999). HDR/HWR
reservoirs: concepts, understanding and creation. Geothermics, Vol. 28, pp. 533-552.
Chandrasekharam, D. (2000). Geothermal energy resources of India Country update.
In: Proceedings, World Geothermal Congress, Japan (2000). E. Iglesias, D.
Blackwell, T. Hunt, J. Lund, S. Tamanyu and K. Kimbara (Ed). pp. 133-145.
Chandrasekharam, D. (2001a). Use of geothermal energy for food processing-Indian
status. Geo-heat Bull. Vol. 22, pp. 8-12.
Chandrasekharam, D. (2001b). HDR prospects of Himalaya geothermal province. In:
Proceed. Geothermal Days 2000, K. Popovski and B.Sanner (Ed). Bad Urah,
Germany, pp. 269-274.
Chandrasekharam, D. (2002). Geothermal energy resources of India. In: Geothermal
Energy Resources for Developing Countries, D. Chandrasekharam and J. Bundschuh
(Ed). A.A. Balkema, The Netherlands, pp. 405-412.
Gupta, M.L., Saxena V.K. and Sukhija, B.S. (1976). An analysis of the hot spring
activity of the Manikaran area, Himachal Pradesh. India, by geochemical studies and
tritium concentration of spring waters. In: Proceed. 2nd UN Symp. Development and
Use of Geothermal Resources, San Francisco, Vol. 1, pp. 741-744.
Gowd, T.N. and Srirama Rao, S.V. (1992). Tectonic Stress Field in the Indian
Subcontinent. J.Geophy.Res., Vol. 97, pp. 11879-11888.
GSI (1991). Geothermal Atlas of India. Geol. Surv. India, Sp.Pub. 19, 143 pp.
Giggenbach, W., Gonfiantini, R., Jangi, B.L. and Truesdell, A.H. (1983). Isotope and
chemical composition of Parbati valley geothermal discharges, North-west Himalaya,
India. Geothermics, Vol. 12, pp. 199-222.
Haris, N., Vance, D. and Ayres, M. (2000). From sediment to granite: timescales of
anatexis in the upper crust. Chem. Geol., Vol. 162, pp. 155-167.
Harrison, T.M., Groove, M., Lovera, O.M. and Catlos, E.J. (1998). A model for the
origin of Himalayan antexis and inverted metamorphism. J.Geophy. Res., Vol. 103,
pp. 27017-27032.
Harrison, T.M., Grove, M., McKeegan, K.D., Coath, C.D., Lovera, O.M. and Le
Foort, P. (1999). Origin and episodic emplacement of the Manaslu intrusive complex,
Central Himalayas. J.Petrol., Vol. 40, pp. 3-19.
Jangi, B.L., Gyan Prakash, Dua, K.J.S, Tussu, J.L., Dhimri, D.B. and Pathak, C.S.
(1976). Geothermal exploration of the Parbati valley geothermal field, Kulu district,
Himachal Pradesh, India. In: Proceed. 2nd UN Symp. Development and Use of
Geothermal Resources, San Francisco, Vol. 2, pp. 1085-1094.
Le Fort, P. and Rai, S.M. (1999). Pre-Tertiary felsic magmatism of the Nepal
Himalaya: recycling of continental crust. J. Asian Earth Sci., Vol. 17, pp. 607-628.
Lund, J. (2002). Direct utilization of geothermal resources. In: Geothermal Energy
Resources for Developing Countries, D.Chandrasekharam and J. Bundschuh (Ed).,
A.A. Balkema, The Netherlands, pp. 129-149.
S04 Paper046 Page 19
International Geothermal Conference, Reykjavík, Sept. 2003 Session #4
Makovsky, Y. and Klemperer, S.L. (1999). Measuring the seismic properties of
Tibetan bright spots: Evidence of free aqueous fluids in the Tibetan middle crust.
J.Geophy. Res., Vol. 104 (10), pp. 795-10, 825.
Noble, S.R., Searle, M.P. and Walker, C.B. (2001). Age and tectonic significance of
Permian granites in Western Zanskar, High Himalaya. J.Geology, Vol. 109, pp. 127-
135.
Pierre Dèzes (1999). Tectonic and metamorphic Evolution of the Central Himalayan
Domain in Southeast Zanskar (Kashmir, India). Ph.D. Thesis (unpublished),
Université de Lausanne, Switzerland, 125 pp.
Ravi Shanker, (1988). Heat-flow of India and discussion on its geological and
economic significance. Indian Miner., Vol. 42, pp. 89-110.
Sachan, H.K. (1996). Cooling history of subduction related granite from the Indus
Suture zone, Ladakh, India: evidence from fluid inclusions. Lithos, Vol. 38, pp. 81-
92.
Sehgal, M.L. (1963). Report on geological mapping in Parvati Valley, Kulu
subdivision, Kangra district, Punjab, Progress report 1962-63, Govt. India, pp. 1-11.
Sinha, K.A., Misra, D. K. and Paul, S.K. (1997). Geology and tectonic features of
Kulu and Spiti-Lahaul sector of NW Himalaya. Hmalayan Geol, Vol. 18, pp. 1-16.
Srikantia, S.V. and Bhargava, O.N. (1998). Geology of Himachal Pradesh. Geolo.
Soc. India, 406 pp.
Schneider, D.A., Edwards, M.A., Zeitler, P.K. and Coath, C.D. (1999 a). Mazeno Pass
pluton and Jutial pluton, Pakistan Himalaya: age and implications for entrapment
mechanism of two granites in Himalayas. Con. Min.Pet., Vol. 136, pp. 273-284.
Schneider, D.A., Edwards, M.A., Kidd, W.S.F., Asif Khan, M., Seeber, L. and Zeitler,
P.K. (1999 b). Tectonics of Nanga Parbat, western Himalaya: Synkinamatic plutonism
within the doubly vergent shear zones of a crustal-scale pop-up structure. Geology,
Vol. 27, pp. 999-1002.
Schneider, D.A., Edwards, M.A., Kidd, W.S.F., Zeitler, P.K. and Coath, C.D. (1999
c). Early Miocene anatexis identified in the western syntaxis, Pakistan Himalaya.
Earth. Planet. Sci. Lett., Vol. 167, pp. 121-129.
Searle, M.P. (1999 a). Extensional and compressional faults in the Everest massif,
Khumbu Himalayas. J. Geol. Soc. London, Vol. 156, pp. 227-240.
Searle, M.P. (1999 b). Emplacement of Himalayan leucogranites by magma injection
along giant complexes: examples from the Cho Oyu, Gyachung Kang and Everest
leucogranites (Nepal Himalaya). J. Asian Earth Sci., Vol. 17, pp. 773-783.
Wyborn, D. 2001. Personal communication.
S04 Paper046 Page 20