ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Osteonecrosis of the jaw may be caused by many different triggers. One of them is described to be the drug or medication related osteonecrosis Ashkan Rashad 1 Ralf Smeets 1 of the jaw. Since many years bisphosphonates induced the dreaded Max Heiland 1 diagnosis. Recently a drug named denosumab is reported to show similar effects on the jaw. In this case report we present a RANK-Ligand inhibitor associated osteonecrosis of the lower jaw and discuss the lights and shadows of this newly introduced drug. Zusammenfassung Die Osteonekrose des Kiefers kann durch verschiedene Auslöser verur-sacht sein. Einer dieser Auslöser wird als die Medikamenten-assoziierte Osteonekrose des Kiefers beschrieben. Seit mehreren Jahren induzieren Bisphosphonate die gefürchtete Diagnose. Kürzlich wurden ähnliche Auswirkungen durch Gabe des Arzneimittels Denosumab beobachtet. Anhand des Fallberichtes präsentieren wir eine RANK-Ligand Inhibitor assoziierte Osteonekrose des Unterkiefers und erörtern die Licht-und Schattenseiten des neuartigen Medikaments.
Content may be subject to copyright.
RANK-Ligand inhibitor associated osteonecrosis of the
jaw
RANK-Ligand Inhibitor-assoziierte Osteonekrose des Kiefers
Abstract
Osteonecrosis of the jaw may be caused by many different triggers. One
of them is described to be the drug or medication related osteonecrosis
Ashkan Rashad1
Ralf Smeets1
of the jaw. Since many years bisphosphonates induced the dreaded Max Heiland1
diagnosis. Recently a drug named denosumab is reported to show
similar effects on the jaw. In this case report we present a RANK-Ligand
inhibitor associated osteonecrosis of the lower jaw and discuss the
lights and shadows of this newly introduced drug. 1 Department of Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgery,
Keywords: RANK-Ligand inhibitor, denosumab, osteonecrosis, jaw,
bisphosphonates
University Medical Center
Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany
Zusammenfassung
Die Osteonekrose des Kiefers kann durch verschiedene Auslöser verur-
sacht sein. Einer dieser Auslöser wird als die Medikamenten-assoziierte
Osteonekrose des Kiefers beschrieben. Seit mehreren Jahren induzieren
Bisphosphonate die gefürchtete Diagnose. Kürzlich wurden ähnliche
Auswirkungen durch Gabe des Arzneimittels Denosumab beobachtet.
Anhand des Fallberichtes präsentieren wir eine RANK-Ligand Inhibitor
assoziierte Osteonekrose des Unterkiefers und erörtern die Licht- und
Schattenseiten des neuartigen Medikaments.
Schlüsselwörter: RANK-Ligand Inhibitor, Denosumab, Osteonekrose,
Kiefer, Bisphosphonate
Introduction
Many patients suffer from bisphosphonate related os-
teonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ). Bearing in mind increas-
ing administration of bisphosphonates (BPs) worldwide,
the peak is not yet reached [1]. BPs are drugs widely used
in the treatment of various bone related disorders such
as osteoporosis, multiple myeloma and bone metastases
[2].
Chemically, BPs are small molecular size stable analogues
of natural inorganic pyrophosphates, with a carbon atom
replacing the oxygen atom that connects the two phos-
phates [3]. They are classified as aminobisphosphonates
or non-aminobisphosphonates and administered orally
or intravenously. The mechanism of action concerns ap-
optosis of osteoclasts, decreased resorption activity and
hence limited bone remodeling [4].
RANK-Ligands (Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor
Kappa-B Ligand) are produced by osteoblasts and pro-
mote differentiation of osteoclasts by binding to RANK-
receptors located on these. A new drug group, namely
denosumab (Prolia®), acts by attaching to RANK-Ligands
in order to prevent binding ofthe complex to RANK-recept-
ors resulting in an impaired function of osteoclasts. While
the pharmaceutical aim is the same as for BPs, the way
of action differs [5]. In general, the area of indication is
similar to widely distributed BPs [6], [7].
Denosumab was approved by European Medicines Agency
in May 2010 for the treatment of osteoporosis of women
in postmenopause and osteoporosis in men caused by
hormone therapy due to prostate cancer [8]. The US Food
and Drug Administration followed that approval in June
2010 [9] and extended the therapeutic field for osteo-
porosis in men independent of hormone therapy in
September 2012, which is still outstanding in European
Union [10].
Case description
A 74-year-old edentulous woman with osteoporosis and
fibromyalgia complained about growing pressure pain of
the mandible following extraction of the lower anterior
teeth and insertion of mucosa supported complete den-
ture 6 months ago. Her medical history revealed 6 time
administration of denosumab (Prolia®60 mg) subcu-
taneously over the past 2.5 years. Fibromyalgia was
1/3GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW 2013, Vol. 2, ISSN 2193-8091
Case Report
OPEN ACCESS
treated with decortin. While intraorally no dehiscence was
detected (Figure 1), a panoramic view indicated irregular
bone morphology especially in anterior mandible
(Figure 2) compared to preoperative imaging 10 months
ago (Figure 3). A CT scan illustrated the whole extent
(Figure 4). A RANK-Ligand inhibitor (denosumab) associ-
ated osteonecrosis of the mandible was diagnosed and
reminded us of known BP effects on the jaw. Due to
missing dehiscence she was treated conservatively with
sultamicillin and prosthesis leave for 2 months with slight
improvement of complaints. On the other hand with re-
spect to the great extent of the osteonecrosis, we clarified
the potential need of microvascular free flap for recon-
struction.
Figure 1: Intraoral illustration of lower jaw with absence of any
dehiscence
Figure 2: Panoramic view reveals edentulous site after
extraction and disturbed presentation of mainly anterior part
of the mandible
Figure 3: Panoramic pre-extraction view with remaining anterior
teeth 10 months ago
Figure 4: Finally CT scan showed up whole extent of
osteonecrosis
Discussion and conclusion
About 10 years after the first reported and published
cases of BRONJ [11], [12], a new drug group seems to
be associated with similar or even more serious impact.
Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody and inhibits
osteoclast differentiation and proliferation. It has shown
great clinical results with even better bone density values
compared to BPs [13], [14]. However, the costs are many
times higher than for BPs. But due to higher and improved
bioavailability, administration of denosumab would be
sufficient subcutaneously every 6 months.
In contrast to BPs, half-life is not supposed to be several
years. Denosumab’s median half-life period amounts 26
days and could not be detected in more than half of
probands after 6 months. This fact could be beneficial
with respect to necessary dentoalveolar surgery. While
that kind of treatment should be performed necessarily
before BP uptake, denosumab could theoretically allow
operation even after administration requiring absence of
the drug for several months.
Nevertheless, above presented case suggests that the
RANK-Ligand inhibitor is able to harm the jaw seriously
in short period of time. Further studies have to investigate
possible angiogenesis inhibition and soft tissue toxicity
as reported for BPs [15], [16]. That is why we favor to
treat conservatively if possible at the moment. Surgical
procedures should be held limited and gentle to the
periosteum as for BRONJ.
2/3GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW 2013, Vol. 2, ISSN 2193-8091
Rashad et al.: RANK-Ligand inhibitor associated osteonecrosis of ...
Notes
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing in-
terests.
References
1. Marx RE. Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa)induced
avascular necrosis of the jaws: a growing epidemic. J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Sep;61(9):1115-7.
2. Brumsen C, Hamdy NA, Papapoulos SE. Long-term effects of
bisphosphonates on the growing skeleton. Studies of young
patients with severe osteoporosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 1997
Jul;76(4):266-83.
3. Russell RG, Watts NB, Ebetino FH, Rogers MJ. Mechanisms of
action of bisphosphonates: similarities and differences and their
potential influence on clinical efficacy. Osteoporos Int. 2008
Jun;19(6):733-59. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-007-0540-8
4. Plotkin LI, Manolagas SC, Bellido T. Dissociation of the pro-
apoptotic effects of bisphosphonates on osteoclasts from their
anti-apoptotic effects on osteoblasts/osteocytes with novel
analogs. Bone. 2006 Sep;39(3):443-52. DOI:
10.1016/j.bone.2006.02.060
5. Baron R, Ferrari S, Russell RG. Denosumab and bisphosphonates:
different mechanisms of action and effects. Bone. 2011
Apr;48(4):677-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.11.020
6. Geusens P. Emerging treatments for postmenopausal
osteoporosis – focus on denosumab. Clin Interv Aging.
2009;4:241-50.
7. Lewiecki EM. Denosumab update. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009
Jul;21(4):369-73. DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32832ca41c
8. Prolia(R) (Denosumab) Granted Marketing Authorization in the
European Union. In: Amgen.com [Internet]. May 28, 2010.
Available from: http://www.amgen.com/media/media_pr_
detail.jsp?releaseID=1432232
9. FDA Approves Amgen’s Prolia(TM) (Denosumab) for Treatment
of Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis at High Risk for
Fracture. In: Amgen.com [Internet]. June 1, 2010. Available from:
http://www.amgen.com/media/media_pr_detail.jsp?releaseID=
1433162
10. FDA Approves New Indication For Prolia® (Denosumab) For The
Treatment Of Bone Loss In Men With Osteoporosis At High Risk
For Fracture. In: Amgen.com [Internet]. September 20, 2012.
Available from: http://www.amgen.com/media/media_pr_
detail.jsp?releaseID=1737204
11. Ruggiero SL. Guidelines for the diagnosis of bisphosphonate-
related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ). Clin Cases Miner Bone
Metab. 2007 Jan;4(1):37-42.
12. Marx RE. Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa) induced
avascular necrosis of the jaws: a growing epidemic. J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Sep;61(9):1115-7.
13. Brown JP, Prince RL, Deal C, Recker RR, Kiel DP, de Gregorio LH,
Hadji P, Hofbauer LC, Alvaro-Gracia JM, Wang H, Austin M,
Wagman RB, Newmark R, Libanati C, San Martin J, Bone HG.
Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on
BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in
postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized,
blinded, phase 3 trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Jan;24(1):153-
61. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.080901
14. Lipton A, Steger GG, Figueroa J, Alvarado C, Solal-Celigny P, Body
JJ, de Boer R, Berardi R, Gascon P, Tonkin KS, Coleman R,
Paterson AH, Peterson MC, Fan M, Kinsey A, Jun S. Randomized
active-controlled phase II study of denosumab efficacy and safety
in patients with breast cancer-related bone metastases. J Clin
Oncol. 2007 Oct;25(28):4431-7. DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2007.11.8604
15. Mortensen M, Lawson W, Montazem A. Osteonecrosis of the jaw
associated with bisphosphonate use: Presentation of seven
cases and literature review. Laryngoscope. 2007 Jan;117(1):30-
4. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000240885.64568.9e
16. Wood J, Bonjean K, Ruetz S, Bellahcène A, Devy L, Foidart JM,
Castronovo V, Green JR. Novel antiangiogenic effects of the
bisphosphonate compound zoledronic acid. J Pharmacol Exp
Ther. 2002 Sep;302(3):1055-61. DOI:
10.1124/jpet.102.035295
Corresponding author:
Dr. Ashkan Rashad, MD, DMD
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University
Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52,
D-20246 Hamburg, Germany, Tel.: +49-177/856-2393,
Fax: +49-40/7410-55467
a.rashad@uke.de
Please cite as
Rashad A, Smeets R, Heiland M. RANK-Ligand inhibitor associated
osteonecrosis of the jaw. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW.
2013;2:Doc17.
DOI: 10.3205/iprs000037, URN: urn:nbn:de:0183-iprs0000374
This article is freely available from
http://www.egms.de/en/journals/iprs/2013-2/iprs000037.shtml
Published:
2013-11-19
Copyright
©2013 Rashad et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under
the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You
are free: to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided
the original author and source are credited.
3/3GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW 2013, Vol. 2, ISSN 2193-8091
Rashad et al.: RANK-Ligand inhibitor associated osteonecrosis of ...
... Adverse effects to denosumab are reported in dentistry. A 74-year-old woman treated with denosumab developed osteonecrosis of the mandible [23]. In a recent review article [24], the authors studied bone biopsies collected from patients exposed to denosumab that presented infectious, inflammatory and necrotic jaw diseases. ...
Article
Full-text available
Denosumab–Prolia®, Xgeva® (Amgen) is a fully human antibody to the receptor activator of the nuclear factor-K ligand (RANKL). Hepatotoxicity is extremely rare, with only one reported case of immune origin. We present a second case of hepatotoxicity resulting from an immune reaction to denosumab. A 43-year-old female was referred to the Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Department for treatment of low bone mineral density (BMD) following endocrine therapy with letrozole and lucrin because of breast cancer. She developed premature menopause at the age of 36 years when she underwent a left lumpectomy due to an infiltrating duct carcinoma of the breast (T1 NO MO) and was subsequently started on endocrine therapy. Denosumab was started to prevent osteoporosis. On the third year after starting on denosumab and one month after she received the last injection, she became ill. The routine biochemical analysis showed that the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) rose appreciatively to 10 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). The gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) level was elevated slightly to 67 U/L (0–38 U/L). The serum gamma-globulin level was elevated to 1.72 g/dL (0.7–1.6 gr/dl), while the total bilirubin (TB) and serum albumin levels were normal. A liver biopsy revealed a moderate to severe chronic inflammatory infiltrate containing MUM-1 positive plasma cells. In addition, numerous CD-3 positive small T lymphocytes and few CD-20 positive B lymphocytes and eosinophils were seen in the portal tracts. Moderate to severe interface hepatitis, bile duct proliferation and mild portal fibrosis were also identified. The results could be consistent with the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI).
... Mounting evidence suggests an association between the longterm use of bisphosphonate or denosumab and ASTFs [134][135][136][137][138][139][140]. However, the incidence of such fractures is small, and the occurrence is unpredictable. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Anti-resorptive drugs are the most commonly used medications for treating metabolic bone diseases. These agents reduce the risk of osteoporosis fractures, control Paget's disease, hypercalcemia of malignancy and bone metastasis. However, administration of high doses or long-term use are associated with rare but serious adverse effects. Areas covered: Beyond 5 years of use, fracture reduction benefits of bisphosphonate and denosumab are minimal, while the incidence of serious adverse events increases. Thus the FDA recommends limiting treatment to less than 5 years. However, treating beyond 5 years with bisphosphonates or denosumab is appropriate in patients in whom the reduction of fracture benefits outweighs adverse effects. Detailed insight into safety and the duration of use of potent anti-resorptive agents are discussed. Expert commentary: Considering the safety and effectiveness, in patients with osteoporosis and Paget's disease of bone, the use of potent antiresorptive agents should be limited for five years and three years in patients with cancer to control the complications. An annual reassessment is recommended for patients with osteoporosis, and Paget's disease these agents to (a) assess overall health, adherence to medication, and objective measures of improvements; (b) exclude secondary causes of bone loss; and
Article
Full-text available
The pathway of the receptor activator of the nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL), RANK and osteoprotegerin (OPG) plays a central role in coupling bone formation and resorption during normal bone turnover and in a wide spectrum of diseases characterized by disturbed bone remodeling, increased bone resorption and bone destruction (osteoporosis, Paget's disease of bone, rheumatoid arthritis [RA], metastatic bone disease). Clinical trials indicate that denosumab, a RANKL-specific recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody, is effective in suppressing bone resorption, resulting in increase in bone mineral density (BMD) in post-menopausal women with low BMD, and has the potential to prevent progression of erosions in RA and of skeletal-related events in metastatic bone disease. The effects on fracture reduction in postmenopausal osteoporosis are awaited from the recently finished FREEDOM study. In clinical trials with denosumab, overall adverse events were similar to placebo or comparators, indicating a favorable safety profile in these diseases, which until now have been available up to 4 years, but data on long-term safety will be needed.
Article
Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits bone resorption by neutralizing RANKL, a key mediator of osteoclast formation, function, and survival. This phase 3, multicenter, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of denosumab with alendronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. One thousand one hundred eighty-nine postmenopausal women with a T-score ≤ −2.0 at the lumbar spine or total hip were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous denosumab injections (60 mg every 6 mo [Q6M]) plus oral placebo weekly (n = 594) or oral alendronate weekly (70 mg) plus subcutaneous placebo injections Q6M (n = 595). Changes in BMD were assessed at the total hip, femoral neck, trochanter, lumbar spine, and one-third radius at 6 and 12 mo and in bone turnover markers at months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events and laboratory values. At the total hip, denosumab significantly increased BMD compared with alendronate at month 12 (3.5% versus 2.6%; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, significantly greater increases in BMD were observed with denosumab treatment at all measured skeletal sites (12-mo treatment difference: 0.6%, femoral neck; 1.0%, trochanter; 1.1%, lumbar spine; 0.6%, one-third radius; p ≤ 0.0002 all sites). Denosumab treatment led to significantly greater reduction of bone turnover markers compared with alendronate therapy. Adverse events and laboratory values were similar for denosumab- and alendronate-treated subjects. Denosumab showed significantly larger gains in BMD and greater reduction in bone turnover markers compared with alendronate. The overall safety profile was similar for both treatments.
Article
Bisphosphonates are a class of agents used to treat osteoporosis and malignant bone metastases. Despite these benefits, osteonecrosis of the jaws has recently emerged as a significant complication in a subset of patients receiving these drugs. Based on a growing number of case reports and institutional reviews, bisphosphonate therapy may cause exposed and necrotic bone that is isolated to the jaw. This complication usually presents following simple dentoalveolar surgery and can cause a significant adverse effect on the quality of life for most patients. The pathogenesis for this complication appears to be related to the profound inhibition of osteoclast function and bone remodeling. This report will review the clinical signs and symptoms and risks associated with this new complication and provide a guideline for establishing a stage-specific diagnosis of BRONJ.
Article
To treat systemic bone loss as in osteoporosis and/or focal osteolysis as in rheumatoid arthritis or periodontal disease, most approaches target the osteoclasts, the cells that resorb bone. Bisphosphonates are currently the most widely used antiresorptive therapies. They act by binding the mineral component of bone and interfere with the action of osteoclasts. The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, such as alendronate, act as inhibitors of farnesyl-pyrophosphate synthase, which leads to inhibition of the prenylation of many intracellular signaling proteins. The discovery of RANKL and the essential role of RANK signaling in osteoclast differentiation, activity and survival have led to the development of denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody. Denosumab acts by binding to and inhibiting RANKL, leading to the loss of osteoclasts from bone surfaces. In phase 3 clinical studies, denosumab was shown to significantly reduce vertebral, nonvertebral and hip fractures compared with placebo and increase areal BMD compared with alendronate. In this review, we suggest that the key pharmacological differences between denosumab and the bisphosphonates reside in the distribution of the drugs within bone and their effects on precursors and mature osteoclasts. This may explain differences in the degree and rapidity of reduction of bone resorption, their potential differential effects on trabecular and cortical bone, and the reversibility of their actions.
Article
Denosumab is an investigational fully human monoclonal antibody to receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand, an essential mediator of osteoclastic bone resorption. Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand plays a major role in the pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis, structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis, and bone loss associated with other skeletal disorders. This is a review of recent clinical data on the efficacy and safety of denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Denosumab reduces bone turnover markers and increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density, reduces fracture risk in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, and inhibits structural damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis when added to ongoing methotrexate treatment. In postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density, denosumab is associated with a greater increase in bone mineral density and greater reduction in bone turnover markers compared with alendronate; when women treated with alendronate are switched to denosumab, there is an increase in bone mineral density that is greater than in those continuing alendronate. Adverse events and serious adverse events, including infections and malignancy, are generally similar in patients treated with denosumab compared with those receiving placebo or alendronate. Denosumab is a promising therapeutic agent for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis.
Article
Osteoporosis in children and adolescents is relatively uncommon and usually secondary to identifiable causal factors. There are no generally accepted therapies for patients with no treatable underlying cause of disease. Any treatment of young patients with bone-acting compounds should be not only effective but also devoid of adverse effects on bone growth and remodeling. For many years we have been studying the effects of bisphosphonates-an effective treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis-on the growing skeleton. We review here our experience in the treatment of young patients with osteoporosis with special emphasis on issues of skeletal safety and effectiveness, and we discuss the available literature data. We studied 12 patients aged between 10.7 and 17.2 years with symptomatic osteoporosis and multiple fractures treated with the bisphosphonates pamidronate or olpadronate for periods between 2 and 8 years continuously. Linear growth continued normally on treatment; there was even a catch-up growth in prepubertal patients, and there was no excessive suppression of bone remodeling, assessed biochemically. Bone biopsies obtained at various stages during treatment showed bone of normal lamellar structure without mineralization defects. There was an increase in calcium balance, already evident within 10 days, the level of which was maintained for at least 3 years of treatment. This was associated with progressive increases in bone mineral density along a different slope from that of healthy peers as well as correction of vertebral deformities on X-rays in patients given bisphosphonates before puberty. Treatment was well tolerated and clinical improvement was remarkable. Our studies, supported by literature data, strongly suggest that bisphosphonate therapy can be beneficial to young patients with osteoporosis for whom no other options are currently available, and justify planning controlled studies in more common conditions for which no treatment is currently available, such as osteogenesis imperfecta.
Article
Bisphosphonate drugs inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption and are widely used to treat skeletal complications in patients with tumor-induced osteolysis. We now show that zoledronic acid, a new generation bisphosphonate with a heterocyclic imidazole substituent, is also a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis. In vitro, zoledronic acid inhibits proliferation of human endothelial cells stimulated with fetal calf serum, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (IC(50) values 4.1, 4.2, and 6.9 microM, respectively), and modulates endothelial cell adhesion and migration. In cultured aortic rings and in the chicken egg chorioallantoic membrane assay, zoledronic acid reduces vessel sprouting. When administered systemically to mice, zoledronic acid potently inhibits the angiogenesis induced by subcutaneous implants impregnated with bFGF [ED(50), 3 microg/kg (7.5 nmol/kg) s.c.]. These findings indicate that zoledronic acid has marked antiangiogenic properties that could augment its efficacy in the treatment of malignant bone disease and extend its potential clinical use to other diseases with an angiogenic component.
Article
Bisphosphonates induce osteoclast apoptosis, thereby decreasing bone resorption and reducing the rate of bone remodeling. Earlier work from our group and others has demonstrated that, additionally, bisphosphonates prevent osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis in vivo and in vitro, raising the possibility that perhaps part of their anti-fracture efficacy may result from preserving the integrity of the osteocyte network and prolonging the working time of bone forming cells. Whereas induction of osteoclast apoptosis results from inhibition of the mevalonate pathway or from conversion to toxic ATP analogs, prevention of osteoblastic cell apoptosis is mediated by connexin43 hemichannel opening and activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs). We examined here the ability of several bisphosphonates, including novel analogs, to exert these two effects. All 16 bisphosphonates studied inhibited etoposide-induced apoptosis of MLO-Y4 osteocytic cells and osteoblastic cells derived from calvaria, with EC50 between 10(-12) and 10(-10) M. On the other hand, only 10 analogs induced apoptosis of RAW-264.7-cell-derived osteoclasts. Each of the 6 bisphosphonates that lack pro-apoptotic activity in osteoclasts but retain anti-apoptotic activity in osteoblasts and osteocytes has a structural-related analog that is active in both cell types. These findings indicate that the structural prerequisites for the anti-apoptotic effect of bisphosphonates on cells of the osteoblastic lineage are less stringent than the ones required to induce osteoclast apoptosis and confirm that bisphosphonates act on the two cell types by distinct mechanisms. Preservation of osteoblast and osteocyte viability without inducing osteoclast apoptosis by these bisphosphonates analogs opens new possibilities for the treatment of bone fragility in conditions in which a decrease in bone remodeling is not desirable.
Article
Bisphosphonates, pyrophosphate analogs, are strong osteoclast inhibitors that are used for osteoporosis and in the treatment of solid tumors with bony metastasis. There are growing reports of osteonecrosis associated with the nitrogen containing bisphosphonates, Pamindronate and Zolendronic acid therapy. Theses cases have been most commonly seen and treated by oral surgeons. An untreated maxillary osteonecrosis can lead to pansinusitis, involving the otolaryngologist in these patients' care. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case series reported in the otolaryngology literature. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients presenting to the Mount Sinai Hospital Center and at Elmhurst General Hospital between October 2003 and November 2004 with a history of refractory osteomyelitis of the jaws and chronic bisphosphonate therapy. Seven patients were identified with both of these conditions. These patients presented with nonhealing ulcers of the mandible or maxilla. Four of the patients were on bisphosphonate therapy, and the other three had been treated with bisphosphonates. Three of the patients required extensive operations to remove the involved bone. One patient required endoscopic sinus surgery. Increasing reports of bisphosphonate associated osteomyelitis and the difficulty in treating these patients requires further investigation to identify the subset of patients who are at increased risk for this process. The optimal and safe duration of treatment with bisphosphonates needs to be determined.