ArticlePDF Available

Issues in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult ADHD by Primary Care Physicians

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Introduction: The objective of this article is to compare primary care physicians' (PCPs') experiences with diagnosing and treating adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) versus other mental health disorders. Methods: Four hundred PCPs who have patients with ADHD, bipolar disorder, depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or obsessive-compulsive disorder completed a public release survey assessing their experiences and attitudes on diagnosing and treating these disorders. Results: Forty-eight percent of PCPs felt uncomfortable diagnosing adult ADHD and 44% reported that there were no clear diagnostic criteria. Seventy-five percent rated the quality and accuracy of existing adult ADHD diagnostic tools as either poor or fair. Seventy-two percent reported that ADHD is easier to diagnose in children than adults. Sixty-five percent reported deferring to specialists to diagnose adult ADHD, compared to 2% for depression and 3% for GAD. Eighty-five percent reported that they would be more comfortable diagnosing and treating adult ADHD if thorough, straightforward screening tools were validated and if there were effective medications that were neither stimulants nor controlled substances. Discussion: While this survey indicated that adult ADHD is generally accepted by PCPs, the results also indicate that PCPs are significantly less likely to diagnose and treat ADHD in adults without deferring to a specialist, when compared to GAD and depression. The recent development of new screening tools for adult ADHD as well as non-stimulant and novel stimulant medications may reduce PCPs' reliance on specialist referrals. Conclusion: This study highlights a potential need for PCPs for increased education and training in adult ADHD. As the study was conducted 6 years ago, follow-up investigations into the current PCP awareness of adult ADHD are indicated.
Content may be subject to copyright.
57
Primary Psychiatry © MBL Communications Inc.
Issues in the Diagnosis and Treatment of
Adult ADHD by Primary Care Physicians
Lenard Adler, MD, David Shaw, BA, David Sitt, PsyD, Erica Maya, BA,
and Melinda Ippolito Morrill, LMSW, MA
May 2009
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The objective of this article is to compare primary
care physicians’ (PCPs’) experiences with diagnosing and treating
adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) versus other
mental health disorders.
Methods: Four hundred PCPs who have patients with ADHD, bipo-
lar disorder, depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), or
obsessive-compulsive disorder completed a public release survey
assessing their experiences and attitudes on diagnosing and
treating these disorders.
Results: Forty-eight percent of PCPs felt uncomfortable diagnosing
adult ADHD and 44% reported that there were no clear diagnostic
criteria. Seventy-five percent rated the quality and accuracy of exist-
ing adult ADHD diagnostic tools as either poor or fair. Seventy-two
percent reported that ADHD is easier to diagnose in children than
adults. Sixty-five percent reported deferring to specialists to diag-
nose adult ADHD, compared to 2% for depression and 3% for GAD.
Eighty-five percent reported that they would be more comfortable
diagnosing and treating adult ADHD if thorough, straightforward
screening tools were validated and if there were effective medica-
tions that were neither stimulants nor controlled substances.
Discussion: While this survey indicated that adult ADHD is gener-
ally accepted by PCPs, the results also indicate that PCPs are sig-
nificantly less likely to diagnose and treat ADHD in adults without
deferring to a specialist, when compared to GAD and depression.
The recent development of new screening tools for adult ADHD as
well as non-stimulant and novel stimulant medications may reduce
PCPs’ reliance on specialist referrals.
Conclusion: This study highlights a potential need for PCPs for
increased education and training in adult ADHD. As the study was
conducted 6 years ago, follow-up investigations into the current
PCP awareness of adult ADHD are indicated.
Dr. Adler is professor and Mr. Shaw is a research assistant in the Department of Psychiatry, both at New York University (NYU) School of Medicine in New York City. Dr. Sitt is a psychologist at the
Hallowell Center in New York City. Ms. Maya is Clinical Trials Coordinator at the William and Sylvia Silberstein Institute for Aging and Dementia at NYU School of Medicine. Ms. Morrill is a graduate
research assistant at the Center for Couples and Family Research and a doctoral student in clinical psychology at Clark University in Worcester, Massachussetts.
Disclosure: Dr. Adler is consultant to Eli Lilly, McNeil/Johnson & Johnson, the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Organon, Psychogenics, sanofi-aventis, and Shire; is on the speaker’s bureaus of
McNeil/Johnson & Johnson and Shire; and receives research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, McNeil/Johnson & Johnson, the NIDA, and Shire. Mr. Shaw, Dr. Sitt, Ms. Maya, and Ms. Morrill report
no affiliation with or financial interest in any organization that may pose a conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments: This study was commissioned by the New York University School of Medicine in cooperation with Eli Lilly and was funded in part by a research grant from Eli Lilly.
Please direct all correspondence to: Lenard A. Adler, MD, Department of Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, 530 First Ave #7D, New York, NY 10016; Tel: 212-263-3580; Fax: 212-263-3581;
E-mail: lenard.adler@nyumc.org.
FOCUS POINTS
This article explores new findings about issues with diag-
nosing and treating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
(ADHD) in adults by primary care physicians (PCPs).
Despite a high rate of prevalence and significant impair-
ments, most adults with ADHD have not been diagnosed
and remain untreated.
PCPs had less training and had lower comfort levels treat-
ing adults with ADHD than with depression and anxiety
disorders.
PCPs were more likely to refer adult patients with ADHD to
specialists for diagnosis and/or treatment than they were
for adult patients with major depressive disorder or gener-
alized anxiety disorder.
PCPs would be more likely to diagnose adult ADHD if quick,
easy-to-use screening tools were developed and validated.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Primary Psychiatry. 2009;16(5 ):57-63
L. Adler, D. Shaw, D. Sitt, E. Maya, M.I. Morrill
58
Primary Psychiatry © MBL Communications Inc. May 2009
L. Adler, D. Shaw, D. Sitt, E. Maya, M.I. Morrill
INTRODUCTION
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a
chronic and commonly occurring neuropsychiatric disorder
that is usually first diagnosed in childhood and is associated
with an inability to sustain attention and/or an inability
to regulate motor behavior.1 Research has shown ADHD
to negatively impact attention,2,3 behavioral inhibition,2,3
memory,2,3 and functional outcomes2,4-8 in many settings of
daily life including home,2,9 school,2,5 work,2,5 driving,5,10 and
interpersonal relationships.5,10
The prevalence of ADHD in children is approximately 6%
to 8% world wide11 and it is estimated that 66% continue to
meet full criteria or partial criteria with significant impair-
ment as adults, indicating that as many as 8 million adults
in the United States have the disorder.4,12-15 The National
Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R), a nationally rep-
resentative survey conducted in the US between 2001–2003
of ~10,000 English-speaking household residents ≥18 years
of age, demonstrated that the prevalence of ADHD in adults
in the US is ~4.4%.16
While recognition of adult ADHD has grown recently in
the medical community and general population, the disorder
remains under-recognized and under-treated when compared
to other commonly occurring mental health disorders such
as mood, anxiety, or substance use disorders.17 Results from
a 2005 survey found that ~1.5 million adults in the US were
diagnosed with and receiving treatment for ADHD, indicating
that only 1 in 4 adults with the disorder have been diagnosed
and are receiving adequate medical attention.18 The NCS-R
found that >40% of respondents who met the criteria for
ADHD reported that they had not been previously diagnosed
with the disorder despite seeing a healthcare professional in the
previous year.16,19 In fact, only 10% of the sample with ADHD
had received treatment for the disorder within the year prior to
the interview.16 Furthermore, only 25% of respondents with
ADHD who had received treatment within the previous year
for a mental health or substance use disorder reported also
receiving treatment for ADHD.16
The principal goal of this study was to examine the
experiences and attitudes of primary care physicians (PCPs)
regarding the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD in adults
through a public release survey. For some portions of the
survey, PCPs were asked to also rate their experiences and
attitudes regarding other disorders such as major depressive
disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), bipo-
lar disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).
METHODS
The survey was approved by the New York University
School of Medicine Institutional Board of Research Associates.
Participants in the survey included 400 PCPs recruited ran-
domly from the master directory of the American Medical
Association. Physicians were selected using the following cri-
teria. First, they were currently practicing as part of a family,
general, or internal medicine practice Second, they had been
practicing for at least 2 years. Last, they were currently treat-
ing at least 30 adult patients per week with any combination
of the target disorders, which were ADHD, bipolar disorder,
MDD, GAD, or OCD. These disorders were chosen because
they are commonly occurring, impairing disorders character-
ized by low rates of diagnosis and adequate treatment among
patients in treatment.20-22
Potential participants were mailed an invitation to partici-
pate in an online survey. Each invitation explained the purpose
of the research in general terms and contained a unique pass-
word and URL to access the survey. Passwords were provided
for security purposes and to prevent duplicate responding. The
survey was made available online from May 14—May 28,
2003 by Harris Interactive. Physicians completing the survey
received a $40 honorarium. Fewer than 40% of physicians who
received the invitation completed the survey. Demographic
information of the physicians can be found in Table 1.
The survey asked the physicians to rate the following
items on a five-point scale from lowest (ie, poor) to highest
(ie, extremely knowledgeable/thorough): their knowledge
of the target disorders; the quality of their education and/or
training received regarding the target disorders; their per-
ceptions regarding specific aspects relating to the diagnosis
and treatment of adult ADHD (ie, adult ADHD is more
difficult to diagnose than childhood ADHD); their per-
TABLE 1
PHYSICIAN DEMOGRAPHICS
Mean number of patients in practice >18
years of age 2,407.1
Mean number of years since residency 13.4
Medical Specialty %
Family Practice 53
Internal Medicine 40
General Practice 7
Practice Setting %
Single-specialty group 33
Solo practice 27
Multi-specialty group 20
Outpatient clinic 11
Hospital-based practice 9
Other 1
Adler L, Shaw D, Sitt D, Maya E, Morrill MI. Primary Psychiatry. Vol 16, No 5. 2009.
L. Adler, D. Shaw, D. Sitt, E. Maya, M.I. Morrill
L. Adler, D. Shaw, D. Sitt, E. Maya, M.I. Morrill
59
Primary Psychiatry © MBL Communications Inc. May 2009
Issues in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult ADHD by Primary Care Physicians
ception regarding the quality of diagnostic tools available
for the target disorders; and their perception regarding the
importance of specific qualities/parameters necessary for an
effective screening tool for adult ADHD. Lastly, physicians
were asked to rate the frequency that they refer patients to
a specialist for the treatment of each of the target disorders
and the reasons why they collaborate with or defer to a spe-
cialist when diagnosing adult ADHD.
All reported significance refers to 95% confidence, using
unweighted data. Descriptive results are reported for all
analyses. For the purposes of explanation, a data reduction
was performed when presenting results for items rated on a
five-point scale and results are hereafter presented only for
the two highest-rated items.
RESULTS
Knowledge Differential
Respondents reported that they saw significantly more
patients in an average week with depression and GAD than
any of the other three target disorders (Table 2). This corre-
lated with the finding that respondents consider themselves
significantly more knowledgeable about both MDD and
GAD than they are about bipolar disorder, OCD, or ADHD
(Figure 1). Only 34% of respondents answered that they
were either very or extremely knowledgeable about adult
ADHD (Figure 1). Furthermore, only 13% of respondents
reported that they had received very or extremely thorough
clinical training in adult ADHD which was significantly
less than all of the other target disorders except for OCD
(Figure 2). Seventy-seven percent of physicians reported
that they believe that adult ADHD is not well understood
by the medical community (Figure 3).
Knowledge and Understanding of Adult ADHD
in Primary Care
Somewhat contrary to the reported lack of knowledge
and understanding of adult ADHD, only 26% of respon-
dents concurred that ADHD is a condition that the vast
majority of children outgrow (Figure 3). However, 72%
reported that it is more difficult to diagnose ADHD in
adulthood than in childhood (Figure 3). Nearly half of
respondents reported that they were not confident in
TABLE 2
PATIENT ROSTER
Target Conditions
Mean Number of
Patients
Mean Number of
Patients per Week
Depression 215.7 29.8
GAD 150.0 22.0
Bipolar disorder 26.8 6.5
ADHD 23.7 5.9
OCD 22.3 4.8
GAD=generalized anxiety disorder; ADHD=attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder;
OCD=obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Adler L, Shaw D, Sitt D, Maya E, Morrill MI. Primary Psychiatry. Vol 16, No 5. 2009.
FIGURE 1
PERCEIVED KNOWLEDGE OF THE TARGET DISORDERS
GAD=generalized anxiety disorder; OCD=obsessive-compulsive disorder; ADHD=attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Adler L, Shaw D, Sitt D, Maya E, Morrill MI. Primary Psychiatry. Vol 16, No 5. 2009.
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
% Very/Extremely Knowledgeable (top 2 box)
Depression GAD Bipolar disorder OCD ADHD
(n=336) (n=331) (n=144) (n=134) (n=137)
92%
83%
36% 34% 34%
FIGURE 2
PERCEIVED EDUCATION IN TARGET DISORDERS
GAD=generalized anxiety disorder; OCD=obsessive-compulsive disorder; ADHD=attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Adler L, Shaw D, Sitt D, Maya E, Morrill MI. Primary Psychiatry. Vol 16, No 5. 2009.
60%
40%
20%
0%
% Very/Extremely Thorough (top 2 box)
Depression GAD Bipolar disorder OCD ADHD
(n=227) (n=159) (n=78) (n=58) (n=53)
57%
40%
20%
15% 13%
L. Adler, D. Shaw, D. Sitt, E. Maya, M.I. Morrill
60
Primary Psychiatry © MBL Communications Inc. May 2009
L. Adler, D. Shaw, D. Sitt, E. Maya, M.I. Morrill
their ability to diagnose ADHD in adults (48%) and
believe that there are no clear criteria for diagnosing
adults with the disorder (44%; Figure 3). Seventy-three
percent of respondents reported that the underlying
symptoms of ADHD are similar in children and adults
but the manifestations of these symptoms differ through-
out the life course (Figure 3).
Dependence on Referrals
Only 35% of respondents reported that they would diag-
nose adult ADHD without referring patients to a specialist,
whereas the vast majority reported that they would diagnose
major depression (98%) and GAD (97%) themselves (Figure
4). Respondents reported that they were most likely to refer
FIGURE 3
PERCEPTIONS OF ADULT ADHD
ADHD=attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Adler L, Shaw D, Sitt D, Maya E, Morrill MI. Primary Psychiatry. Vol 16, No 5. 2009.
I would take a more active role in diagnosing and treating adult
ADHD if there were an easy-to-use, validated screening tool
developed by physicians or institutions I respect
Adult ADHD is not very well researched or understood by the
medical community
I would take a more active role in diagnosing and treating adult
ADHD if there were effective prescription medicines that were not
stimulants or controlled substances
The underlying symptoms of ADHD are similar in children and
adults but the manifestation of the symptoms differs between
groups
It is more difficult to diagnose an adult with ADHD than it is to
diagnose a child with ADHD
I am not confident in my ability to diagnose adult ADHD
There are no clear criteria for diagnosising adults with ADHD
ADHD is a condition that the vast majority of children outgrow
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
85%
77%
75%
73%
72%
48%
44%
26%
% Answering Somewhat/Completely Agree
FIGURE 4
PERCENTAGE OF PCPS WHO DIAGNOSE THEMSELVES OR
REFER TO SPECIALISTS FOR DIAGNOSIS
PCPs=primary care physicians; OCD=obsessive-compulsive disorder; ADHD=attention-
deficit/hyperactivity disorder; GAD=generalized anxiety disorder.
Adler L, Shaw D, Sitt D, Maya E, Morrill MI. Primary Psychiatry. Vol 16, No 5. 2009.
54% 47%
65%
35%
98%
2%
3%
97%
33%
68%
ADHD
OCD
GAD
Depression
Bipolar Disorder
Diagnose myself
Refer to a specialist for diagnosis
FIGURE 5
TYPES OF PHYSICIANS/SPECIALISTS THAT PCPS ARE LIKE-
LY TO COLLABORATE WITH OR DEFER TO WHEN DIAGNOSING
ADULT PATIENTS WITH ADHD
PCPs=primary care physicians; ADHD=attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Adler L, Shaw D, Sitt D, Maya E, Morrill MI. Primary Psychiatry. Vol 16, No 5. 2009.
General Psychiatrists
Psychologists
Neurologists
Other PCP
Other
86%
55%
16%
3%
2%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
% Answering Somewhat/Completely Agree
L. Adler, D. Shaw, D. Sitt, E. Maya, M.I. Morrill
L. Adler, D. Shaw, D. Sitt, E. Maya, M.I. Morrill
61
Primary Psychiatry © MBL Communications Inc. May 2009
Issues in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult ADHD by Primary Care Physicians
adult patients seeking a diagnosis of ADHD to either a psy-
chiatrist (86%) or psychologist (55%; Figure 5). Fifty-two
percent of respondents attributed inexperience or lack of
confidence as the primary reason for collaborating with or
deferring to specialists when diagnosing adult ADHD, and
22% reported that they believed adult ADHD to have no
clear diagnostic criteria (Figure 6). Furthermore, only 5% of
respondents reported that they make the final decision regard-
ing medication when treating adult ADHD with 42% report-
ing that they collaborate with specialists and 53% reporting
that they refer their adult ADHD patients to specialists.
Need for an Adult ADHD Screening Tool
Ratings of the quality of adult ADHD screening tools were
significantly worse compared to screening tools for the other
FIGURE 6
PCPS’ REASONS FOR COLLABORATING WITH OR DEFERING
TO SPECIALISTS WHEN DIAGNOSING ADULT ADHD
PCPs=primary care physicians.
Adler L, Shaw D, Sitt D, Maya E, Morrill MI. Primary Psychiatry. Vol 16, No 5. 2009.
Inexperience/lack of
confidence
Difficult to diagnose and
treat/no clear diagnostic
Second opinion/confirm diagnosis
Many treatment medications are
controlled substances
Other
Time constraints
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Percent Answering
52%
22%
20%
13%
11%
4%
FIGURE 7
PERCEIVED QUALITY AND ACCURACY OF DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS
OF TARGET DISORDERS
GAD=generalized anxiety disorder; OCD=obsessive-compulsive disorder; ADHD=attention-
deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Adler L, Shaw D, Sitt D, Maya E, Morrill MI. Primary Psychiatry. Vol 16, No 5. 2009.
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
75%
48%
46%
16%
7%
% Fair or Poor (bottom 2 box)
Depression GAD Bipolar disorder OCD ADHD
FIGURE 8
PCPS’ PERCEPTION OF THE IMPORTANT QUALITIES OF A SCREENING TOOL FOR ADULT ADHD
PCPs=primary care physicians; ADHD=attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; DSM-IV=Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition.
Adler L, Shaw D, Sitt D, Maya E, Morrill MI. Primary Psychiatry. Vol 16, No 5. 2009.
Easy to use
Validated with a large patient population
Relatively quick to administer
Physician administered
Patient self-administered
Created by a leading university with expertise in
neuroscience
Endorsed by leading health organization such as the
World Health Organization
Based on current DSM-IV criteria used for
diagnosing ADHD in children
Created by a team of physicians who specialize in
the treatment and diagnosis of ADHD
93%
90%
84%
81%
52%
50%
47%
44%
35%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
% Answering Very/Extremely Important
L. Adler, D. Shaw, D. Sitt, E. Maya, M.I. Morrill
62
Primary Psychiatry © MBL Communications Inc. May 2009
L. Adler, D. Shaw, D. Sitt, E. Maya, M.I. Morrill
target disorders. Seventy-five percent of respondents reported
that they thought the quality and accuracy of diagnostic tools
for adult ADHD was either poor or fair (Figure 7). Eighty-
five percent of respondents indicated that they would take a
more active role in diagnosing and treating adult ADHD if
an easy-to-use, relatively quick to administer screening tool
was developed and validated by physicians or institutions
they respect (Figure 8). However, only ~50% of respondents
indicated that screening tools for adult ADHD should be
based on the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition23 criteria for diagnosing
ADHD in children (Figure 8).
Need for Alternative Treatments
A significant number of respondents (13%) reported that
they refer adult ADHD patients to specialists for treatment
because many of the pharmacologic treatments, such as
methylphenidate and amphetamines, are psychostimulants
and controlled substances (Figure 6). Seventy-five percent of
respondents indicated that they would take a more active role
in diagnosing and treating adult ADHD if effective, non-
stimulant medications that were not controlled substances
were available (Figure 3).
DISCUSSION
While the results of this survey indicate that adult ADHD
is generally accepted by PCPs, it also highlighted a need
within the primary care community for more education and
training in diagnosing and treating adults with the disorder.
Although the majority of respondents reported that they
thought the underlying symptoms of ADHD are the same for
children and adults, they indicated that they thought adults
manifest these symptoms differently than children and that
the disorder is more difficult to diagnose in adulthood than
in childhood. This difficulty may be partially attributed to
the DSM-IV criteria for ADHD, which often reflect behavior
in school or playground settings, being the same for both
children and adults.6,24-27
Although the willingness of PCPs to diagnose and treat
adult ADHD without deferring to a specialist was strikingly
low when compared with MDD and GAD, the majority of
respondents reported that they would be more active in diag-
nosing and treating adult ADHD if they had an easy-to-use,
validated screening tool. It should be noted that since this
survey was conducted, the Adult ADHD Self-Report (ASRS)
v1.1 Screener has been developed and validated. The ASRS
v.1. Screener uses adult-specific, context-based language
to identify adults at risk for ADHD.28,29 The ASRS v1.1
Screener is self-administered and contains the six symptoms
of ADHD psychometrically determined to be most predictive
of the disorder.19,29 The ASRS v1.1 Screener has shown good
sensitivity and specificity and has a positive predictive value
between 57% and 93%.29,30 The ASRS is also available in an
18-item format (ASRS v1.1 Symptom Checklist), which con-
tains the 18 items corresponding to the adult presentation of
ADHD symptoms in the DSM-IV. The ASRS v1.1 Screener
and Symptom Checklist are copyrighted by the World Health
Organization and are available at no cost on the Internet.31,32
The majority of respondents also reported that they would
be more active in treating adult ADHD if non-stimulant med-
ications that were not controlled substances were available.
Around the same time that this survey was conducted, the
first non-stimulant medication, atomoxetine, was approved
and released for the treatment of adult ADHD. Additionally,
the first pro-drug stimulant, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate,
with a reduced overdose toxicity and drug tampering, was
recently approved for the treatment of pediatric and adult
ADHD.33-37 Together with the availability of novel extended-
release formulations of traditional psychostimulants and the
advent of non-stimulant and safer stimulant medications as
viable treatment options, the reluctance to treat adult ADHD
amongst the primary care community may be reduced.
There were several limitations to the current investigation.
First, <40% of the selected PCPs completed the survey, which
may indicate a selection bias. Second, the survey was conducted
in 2003 and there has likely been an increase in the awareness
and familiarity of adult ADHD amongst PCPs as well as the
general population. Third, advances made in the understand-
ing of adult ADHD in the scientific community as well as the
development of new diagnostic/symptom assessment scales and
medications may have had a positive impact on the willingness
of PCPs to diagnose and treat the disorder in adults.
CONCLUSION
Although the prevalence of adult ADHD is comparable to
that of MDD and GAD, this survey highlighted a potential
need amongst PCPs for more education and training in adult
ADHD. However, follow-up investigations into the current
PCP awareness of adult ADHD are needed as new, easy-to-
use screening tools for adult ADHD and non-stimulant and
novel stimulant medications have been developed in the 6
years since the survey was conducted. PP
REFERENCES
1. Barkley RA. Genetics of childhood disorders: XVII. ADHD, part 1: the executive functions and ADHD. J Am
Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;39(8):1064-1068.
2. Spencer T, Biederman J, Wilens T, Faraone SV. Is attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults a valid
disorder? Harv Rev Psychiatry. 1994;1(6):326-335.
3. Hervey AS, Epstein JN, Curry JF. Neuropsychology of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a
meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology. 2004;18(3):485-503.
4. Biederman J, Monuteaux MC, Mick E, et al. Young adult outcome of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder:
a controlled 10 year follow-up study. Psychol Med. 2006;36(2):167-179.
L. Adler, D. Shaw, D. Sitt, E. Maya, M.I. Morrill
L. Adler, D. Shaw, D. Sitt, E. Maya, M.I. Morrill
63
Primary Psychiatry © MBL Communications Inc. May 2009
Issues in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult ADHD by Primary Care Physicians
5. Barkley RA. Major life activity and life outcomes associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J
Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63(suppl 12):10-15.
6. Barkley RA. Development course, adult outcome, and clinic-referred ADHD adults. In: Barkley RA. Attention
Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford
Press; 1998:186-224.
7. Biederman J, Petty C, Fried R, Fontanella J, Doyle AE, Seidman LJ. Impact of psychometrically defined
deficits of executive functioning in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry.
2006;163(10):1730-8.
8. Biederman J, Faraone, SV, Spencer TJ, Mick E, Monuteaux MC, Aleardi M. Functional impairments in adults
with self-reports of diagnosed ADHD: a controlled study of 1001 adults in the community. J Clin Psychiatry.
2006;67(4):524-40.
9. Eakin L, Minde K, Hechtman L, et al. The marital and family functioning of adults with ADHD and their
spouses. J Atten Disord. 2004;8:1-10.
10. Barkley RA, Murphy KR, Dupaul GI, Bush T. Driving in young adults with attention deficit hyperactiv-
ity disorder: knowledge, performance, adverse outcomes, and the role of executive functioning. J Int
Neuropsychol Soc. 2002;8(5):655-672.
11. Faraone SV, Sergeant J, Gillberg C, Biederman J. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: is it an American
condition? World Psychiatry. 2003;2(2):104-113.
12. Biederman J, Faraone SV, Keenen K, Knee D, Tsuang MT. Family-genetic and psychosocial risk factors in
DSM-III attention deficit disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1990;29(4):526-533.
13. Mannuzza S, Klein RG, Bessler A, Malloy P, LaPadula M. Adult outcome of hyperactive boys: educational
achievement, occupational rank, and psychiatric status. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50(7):565-576.
14. Weiss G, Hechtman L. Hyperactive Children Grow Up: ADHD in Children, Adolescents, and Adults. 2nd ed.
New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1993.
15. Elliot H. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: a guide for the primary care physician. South
Med J. 2002;95(7):736-742.
16. Kessler RC, Adler L, Barkley R, et al. The prevalence and correlates of adult ADHD in the united states:
results from the national comorbidity survey replication. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(4):716-723.
17. Wang PS, Lane M, Olfson M, Pincus HA, Wells KB, Kessler RC. Twelve-month use of mental health services in the
united states: results from the national comorbidity survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):629-640.
18. Castle L, Aubert RE, Verbrugge RR, Khalid M, Epstein RS. Trends in medication treatment for ADHD. J
Atten Disord. 2007;10(4):335-342.
19. Kessler RC, Adler LA, Barkley R, et al. Patterns and predictors of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
persistence into adulthood: results from the national comorbidity survey replication. Biol Psychiatry.
2005;57(11):1442-1451.
20. Wittchen HU, Carter RM, Pfister H, Montgomery SA, Kessler RC. Disabilities and quality of life in
pure and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder and major depression in a national survey. Int Clin
Psychopharmacol. 2000;15(6):319-328.
21. Wittchen HU, Kessler RC, Beesdo K, Krause P, Hofler M, Hoyer J. Generalized anxiety and depression in
primary care: prevalence, recognition, and management. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63(suppl 8):24-34.
22. Üstün TB, Sartorius N. Mental Illness in General Health Care: An International Study. Chichester, UK: John
Wiley & Sons; 1995.
23. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric
Association; 1994.
24. Sallee F, Smirnov A. Atomoxetine: novel therapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and potential
therapeutic implications. Primary Psychiatry. 2003;10(4):41-48.
25. Murphy K, Barkley RA. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: comorbidities and adaptive
impairments. Compr Psychiatry. 1996;37(6): 393-401.
26. Sachdev P. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults. Psychol Med. 1999;29(3):507-514.
27. Stein MA, Fischer M, Szumowski E. Evaluation of adults for ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry.
1999;38(8):940-941.
28. Adler LA, Spencer T, Faraone SV, et al. Validity of pilot adult ADHD self-report scale (ASRS) to rate adult
ADHD symptoms. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2006;18(3):145-148.
29. Kessler RC, Adler L, Ames M, et al. The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS): a
short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychol Med. 2005;35(2):245-56.
30. Kessler RC, Adler LA, Gruber MJ, Sarawate CA, Spencer T, Van Brunt DL. Validity of the world health orga-
nization adult ADHD self-report scale (ASRS) screener in a representative sample of health plan members.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2007;16(2):52-65.
31. Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS-v1.1) Symptom Checklist Instructions. Available at: www.med.nyu.
edu/psych/assets/adhdscreen18.pdf. Accessed March 31, 2009.
32. Adult Self-Report Scale-V1.1 (ASRS-V1.1) Screener. Available at: www.med.nyu.edu/psych/assets/adhd-
screener.pdf. Accessed March 31, 2009.
33. Biederman J, Krishnan S, Zhang Y, McGough JJ, Findling RL. Efficacy and tolerability of lisdexamfetamine
dimesylate (NRP-104) in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a phase III, multicenter,
randomized, double-blind, forced-dose, parallel-group study. Clin Ther. 2007;29(3):450-63.
34. Biederman J, Boellner SW, Childress A, Lopez FA, Krishnan S, Zhang Y. Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and
mixed amphetamine salts extended-release in children with ADHD: a double-blind, placebo-controlled,
crossover analog classroom study. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62(9):970-6.
35. Krishnan S, Montcrief S. Toxicity profile of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in three independent rat toxicology
studies. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2007;101(4):231-40.
36. Krishnan SM, Stark JG. Multiple daily-dose pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in healthy
adult volunteers. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24(1):33-40.
37. Faraone SV, Upadhyaya HP. The effect of stimulant treatment for ADHD on later substance abuse and the
potential for medication misuse, abuse, and diversion. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68(11):e28.
... Clinically, diagnosis requires more retrospective reports from parents and teachers than it does patient selfreports (Sibley et al., 2012). Integrating clinical questionnaires with behavioral and cognition test results is complex and challenging and requires an experienced expert evaluator (Morrill, 2009). Therefore, this process must be carefully performed by trained professionals following repeated observations and by using reports obtained from parents, teachers, or other caregivers. ...
... Moreover, the evaluator must confirm the absence of any other underlying disorders that could be mislabeled as ADHD (Rader et al., 2009). According to a survey by Morrill (2009), more than 85% of clinical staff (primary care physicians) expect auxiliary diagnostic tools for ADHD to be available. The selective use of neuropsychological tests is one such auxiliary diagnostic approach. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder of multifactorial pathogenesis, which is often accompanied by dysfunction in several brain functional connectivity. Resting-state functional MRI have been used in ADHD, and they have been proposed as a possible biomarker of diagnosis information. This study’s primary aim was to offer an effective seed-correlation analysis procedure to investigate the possible biomarker within resting state brain networks as diagnosis information. Method Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data of 149 childhood ADHD were analyzed. In this study, we proposed a two-step hierarchical analysis method to extract functional connectivity features and evaluation by linear classifiers and random sampling validation. Result The data-driven method–ReHo provides four brain regions (mPFC, temporal pole, motor area, and putamen) with regional homogeneity differences as second-level seeds for analyzing functional connectivity differences between distant brain regions. The procedure reduces the difficulty of seed selection (location, shape, and size) in estimations of brain interconnections, improving the search for an effective seed; The features proposed in our study achieved a success rate of 83.24% in identifying ADHD patients through random sampling (saving 25% as the test set, while the remaining data was the training set) validation (using a simple linear classifier), surpassing the use of traditional seeds. Conclusion This preliminary study examines the feasibility of diagnosing ADHD by analyzing the resting-state fMRI data from the ADHD-200 NYU dataset. The data-driven model provides a precise way to find reliable seeds. Data-driven models offer precise methods for finding reliable seeds and are feasible across different datasets. Moreover, this phenomenon may reveal that using a data-driven approach to build a model specific to a single data set may be better than combining several data and creating a general model.
... In many countries, very few PCPs have received formal training on ADHD [14,15] with lack of education about the disorder being a key component of their lack of confidence [33]. Primary care professionals also often feel inadequately equipped to manage or recognise adult ADHD [38]. Interviews with PCPs and other stakeholders [12] described the ADHD pathway and the role of primary care as an intricate process. ...
... These evaluation studies have shown that a short online education resource can be easily implemented and can address these gaps while also impacting practice. The pilot RCT study [47] (with over 68% of GPs having never received any training on ADHD) and others [4,38] have highlighted the lack of ADHD training for PCPs. The pilot RCT showed no difference was observed between participants who had and those who had not had ADHD training, indicating that current training is ad-hoc and not effective. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Despite ADHD impacting around 5% of children in the UK, a lot of healthcare professionals are ill-equipped to deal with this disorder, especially in primary care. Untreated and undiagnosed ADHD can strongly impact individuals throughout their lifetime. It is therefore vital that individuals access treatment and diagnosis at an early stage. The diagnosis pathway for ADHD is complex and varies across countries. However, in many countries, specialist services are responsible for ADHD diagnosis and treatment, following a referral from a primary care physician (PCP). Without such referral, individuals are often unable to access care. Previous studies have shown that PCPs are often ill-equipped to deal with individuals with ADHD, highlighting a lack of knowledge and training, directly impacting access to care. To increase PCPs' knowledge of ADHD, a novel online training program was developed. This innovative approach included co-production with PCPs throughout the development process and is the only online ADHD training to date tailored for PCPs that has been evaluated through a randomised control trial. This chapter first presents common ADHD pathways to care and the barriers to PCPs' understanding of ADHD. The chapter then looks at the development and evaluation of an online intervention aimed at increasing PCPs' confidence and understanding of ADHD.
... Medical students indicated they would refer a child with suspected ADHD to a specialist to confirm the diagnosis. This finding is consistent with a study of primary care physicians in the US, where only 34% of respondents indicated that they were knowledgeable about ADHD (Morrill, 2009). Most health care providers lacked confidence in their training or ability to diagnose and treat ADHD in adults. ...
Article
Full-text available
This systematic literature review was conducted to examine the most studied neurodevelopmental disorders reported in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and explore public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Electronic literature databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar from May 2010 to May 2022. The literature was screened and assessed the quality of surveys of extracted 21 articles following the Best Practices for Survey and Public Opinion Research by the American Association for Public Opinion Research. Since 2010, the most studied neurodevelopmental disorders reported in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia were attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder, with the prevalence of studies conducted in Central province, followed by Western province and the rest of Saudi Arabia in general. The analysis of questionnaires used showed that 20 studies were of high quality, and one was of medium quality. The narrative synthesis of included studies showed an overall lack of knowledge about autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, misconceptions and misunderstandings about these health conditions. More research is needed in all regions of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to contribute to the knowledge about mental health conditions of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder children and their parents to inform policies and practical recommendations.
... Settings in which providers are overburdened due to limited time and heavy caseloads may be more likely to utilize self-report symptom inventory in lieu of a more thorough assessment of adult ADHD (Weis et al., 2019). For example, requests for ADHD evaluations in primary care settings have increased in recent years and primary care physicians are encouraged to use screening instruments as a first step in evaluation for adult ADHD (e.g., Mao & Findling, 2014); however, Adler et al. (2009) surveyed 400 primary care physicians and found only 13% of their sample received thorough clinical training in adult ADHD. Also, 66% of their sample reported they did not feel very or extremely knowledgeable about adult ADHD. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective: Self-report symptom inventories are commonly used in adult ADHD assessment, and research indicates they should be interpreted with caution. This study investigated one self-report symptom inventory for adult ADHD in a clinical sample. Method: Archival data were used to evaluate diagnostic utility of the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale-Self-Report: Long Version (CAARS-S:L) in a sample of 122 adults seeking ADHD assessment. Results: Overall, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) estimates for the ADHD Index and other CAARS-S:L scales demonstrated weak accuracy. Anxiety and depression were the most common diagnoses present when a false positive on the ADHD Index was observed. PPV and specificity for the ADHD Index were higher in males compared to females. Conclusion: The CAARS-S:L may be useful for screening purposes in some cases, but should not be the main method used for diagnostic purposes. Clinical implications of findings are discussed.
... These gaps in care provision are especially evident when clients with disabilities are compared to those without neurodevelopmental challenges. Indeed, a study by Maddox et al. (2019) showed that providers hold significantly worse attitudes towards, and lower intentions of, delivering psychotherapy to autistic clients relative to those without autism, while research comparing providers' comfort levels has shown that they report greater comfortability when treating clients with mood-based challenges versus clients with ADHD (Adler et al., 2009;Miller et al., 2005). Identifying autism-specific deficits in clinician knowledge, confidence, or adaptations to care would suggest the need for autism-specific training and policies to address barriers, while similar levels may imply the need for similar approaches to neurodevelopmental conditions more broadly. ...
Article
Full-text available
Autistic youth have an increased risk of mental health problems. Despite the efficacy of various psychotherapeutic approaches for autistic youth, they often do not receive these interventions. Research is needed to identify patterns of effective treatment for autistic youth and whether they differ from those used for youth with other neurodevelopmental conditions (e.g., attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; ADHD). We compared clinicians’ (N = 557) knowledge, confidence and practices when treating autistic youth and youth with ADHD. Although ratings were moderately high overall and similar interventions were used for both groups, clinicians were significantly less knowledgeable and confident when supporting autistic clients compared to clients with ADHD. Thus, improving clinician perspectives may help facilitate treatment for autistic youth with mental health problems.
... A full evaluation of ADHD, requiring significant time and resources, involves a structured or semi-structured clinical interview, standardized ratings from parent and teachers, and evaluation of impairment, as well as comorbid conditions that might better explain the diagnosis (APA 2013; Committee on Quality Improvement, Subcommittee on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder 2000; National Guideline Centre (UK) 2018). Yet, surveys suggest that the majority of providers in primary care faced with evaluating ADHD report insufficient knowledge or resources to carry out a full evaluation (Adler et al. 2009;Faraone et al. 2004) leading to efforts to develop additional resources (Loskutova et al. 2021), and perhaps contributing to concerns about diagnostic accuracy. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Proper diagnosis of ADHD is costly, requiring in-depth evaluation via interview, multi-informant and observational assessment, and scrutiny of possible other conditions. The increasing availability of data may allow the development of machine-learning algorithms capable of accurate diagnostic predictions using low-cost measures. We report on the performance of multiple classification methods used to predict a clinician-consensus ADHD diagnosis. Classification methods ranged from fairly simple (e.g., logistic regression) to more complex (e.g., random forest), and also included a multi-stage Bayesian approach. All methods were evaluated in two large (N>1000), independent cohorts. The multi-stage Bayesian classifier provides an intuitive approach that is consistent with clinical workflows, and is able to predict ADHD diagnosis with high accuracy (>86%)—though not significantly better than other commonly used classifiers, including logistic regression. Results suggest that data from parent and teacher surveys is sufficient for high-confidence classifications in the vast majority of cases using relatively straightforward methods.
... Despite a 3% prevalence in later life (Michielsen et al., 2012), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is not well-recognized in older adults (Adler et al., 2009). This may be because their subjective and objective cognitive difficulties are taken as signs of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (Callahan et al., 2017;Ivanchak et al., 2012). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective Some features of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may resemble those of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in older adults, contributing to diagnostic uncertainty in individuals seeking assessment in memory clinics. We systematically compared cognition and brain structure in ADHD and MCI to clarify the extent of overlap and identify potential features unique to each. Method Older adults from a Cognitive Neurology clinic (40 ADHD, 29 MCI, 37 controls) underwent neuropsychological assessment. A subsample ( n = 80) underwent structural neuroimaging. Results Memory was impaired in both patient groups, but reflected a storage deficit in MCI (supported by relatively smaller hippocampi) and an encoding deficit in ADHD (supported by frontal lobe thinning). Both groups displayed normal executive functioning. Semantic retrieval was uniquely impaired in MCI. Conclusion Although ADHD has been proposed as a dementia risk factor or prodrome, we propose it is rather a pathophysiologically-unique phenotypic mimic acting via overlap in memory and executive performance.
... This lack of evidence has detrimental outcomes for patients and society. Most clinicians admit being uneasy diagnosing ADHD in older patients (Adler et al., 2009), potentially because of inadequate data regarding its clinical presentation in older adults. Consequently, cognitive symptoms of ADHD (e.g., absentmindedness, forgetfulness) may be misinterpreted as signs of early-stage dementia (Pollack, 2012;Goodman et al., 2016;Callahan et al., 2017), which may result in expensive societal costs related to misdiagnosis (Hunter et al., 2015) and inappropriate care and management of patients. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: The neuropsychological features of older adults with ADHD are largely unknown. This retrospective chart review aims to elucidate their cognitive trajectories using a case series of six older adults with ADHD presenting with memory complaints to a cognitive neurology clinic, whom we argue are a particularly relevant group to study due to their potential to mimic neurodegenerative syndromes. Methods: Participants were included if they were age 40 or older at intake, had ADHD based on DSM-5 criteria, and had cognitive data collected prior to 2014 with follow-up at least 5 years later. Results: Five men and one woman were included ( M = 53.8 years at intake) and had an average of 135.0 months of follow-up data available. Despite notable between- and within-subject variability, cognition generally improved or remained stable across visits. Two participants experienced notable memory decline, but a global consideration of their performance in other domains suggests these deficits may be frontally-mediated. Conclusion: In this small sample, cognition remained generally unchanged across 5–21 years. Isolated impairments likely reflect substantial intra-individual variability across time and measures.
Article
Full-text available
In recent years, the prevalence of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and the number of individuals seeking ADHD assessments has risen significantly, leading to an increased demand for accurate diagnostic tools. This study aimed to identify cutoff scores on the Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS-S:L) that can definitively rule out the presence of ADHD. Among 102 clinically diagnosed adult ADHD participants and 448 non-ADHD participants who completed the CAARS-S:L, a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis established a perfectly discriminant cutoff T-score of <44 on the ADHD Symptoms Total subscale when looking at any ADHD diagnosis and <54 on the Inattentive Symptoms subscale when looking at individuals diagnosed with the inattentive subtype of ADHD. Alternative cutoffs of <54 (ADHD Symptoms Total subscale) and <63 (Inattentive Symptoms subscale) were also identified, both with a sensitivity of 0.95 or higher. Furthermore, the analysis found the ADHD Index to be a poor predictor of a negative ADHD diagnosis, suggesting against the use of this scale for cutoff determination. Despite this limitation, these findings indicate that with specific cutoffs, the CAARS-S:L may have the potential to conclusively rule out ADHD, effectively streamlining the diagnostic process and reducing unnecessary comprehensive assessments in clear negative cases.
Article
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is often misdiagnosed or mistreated in adults because it is often thought of as a childhood problem. If a child is diagnosed and treated for the disorder, it often persists into adulthood. In adult ADHD, the symptoms may be comorbid or mimic other conditions making diagnosis and treatment difficult. Adults with ADHD require an in-depth assessment for proper diagnosis and treatment. The presentation and treatment of adults with ADHD can be complex and often requires interdisciplinary care. Mental health and non-mental health providers often overlook the disorder or feel uncomfortable treating adults with ADHD. The purpose of this manuscript is to discuss the diagnosis and management of adults with ADHD.
Article
Full-text available
The paucity of data concerning the long-term natural history of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a common childhood psychiatric disorder, prompted a longitudinal study to investigate the adult sequelae of the childhood disorder. Prospective study, follow-up intervals ranging from 13 to 19 years (mean, 16 years), with blind systematic clinical assessments. Ninety-one white males (mean age, 26 years), representing 88% of a cohort systematically diagnosed as hyperactive in childhood, and 95 (95%) of comparison cases of similar race, gender, age, whose teachers had voiced no complaints about their school behavior in childhood. Probands had significantly higher rates than comparisons of ADHD symptoms (11% vs 1%), antisocial personality disorders (18% vs 2%), and drug abuse disorders (16% vs 4%). Significant comorbidity occurred between antisocial and drug disorders. Educational and occupational achievements were significantly compromised in the probands. These disadvantages were independent of psychiatric status. We did not find increased rates of affective or anxiety disorders in the probands. Childhood ADHD predicts specific adult psychiatric disorders, namely antisocial and drug abuse disorders. In the adolescent outcome of this cohort, we found that these disturbances were dependent on the continuation of ADHD symptoms. In contrast, in adulthood, antisocial and drug disorders appeared, in part, independent of sustained ADHD. In addition, regardless of psychiatric status, ADHD placed children at relative risk for educational and vocational disadvantage. The results do not support a relationship between childhood ADHD and adult mood or anxiety disorders.
Article
Full-text available
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is increasingly recognized as a legitimate adult diagnostic category. Yet the nature of and comorbidities and adaptive impairments associated with adult ADHD have received little scientific investigation. The present study, therefore, compared 172 adults diagnosed with ADHD with 30 adults referred to the same adult ADHD clinic who were not so diagnosed. The ADHD group showed a significantly greater prevalence of oppositional, conduct, and substance abuse disorders, and greater illegal substance use than control adults. Moreover, adults with ADHD displayed greater self-reported psychological maladjustment, more driving risks (speeding violations), and more frequent changes in employment. Significantly more ADHD adults had experienced a suspension of their driver license, had performed poorly, quit, or been fired from their job, and had a history of poorer educational performance and more frequent school disciplinary actions against them than adults without ADHD. Multiple marriages were more likely in the ADHD group as well. Contrary to previous studies, anxiety and mood disorders were not found to be more prevalent in the ADHD than in the control group. Results suggest that ADHD in adults is associated with relatively specific risks for disruptive behavior disorders, school and job performance problems, and driving risks.
Article
Full-text available
Adults with putative attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are increasingly being referred to psychiatric clinics, often following a self-diagnosis, and demanding a prescription for stimulant medication. This has disconcerted many clinicians and started a debate on the appropriateness of this diagnosis in adults (Shaffer, 1994; Lomas, 1995; Diller, 1996) that is reminiscent of the controversies of the childhood diagnosis in previous years (Lancet, 1986). At issue is not only concern about the widespread use of stimulant medication, but also a neurobiological understanding of impulsivity, hyperactivity and antisocial behaviour and the genesis of some psychiatric disorders in adults. How is the validity of this disorder in adults then to be established?
Article
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) presents with significant morbidity across the lifespan and can no longer be relegated to the child mental health arena alone. Prospective outcome studies of childhood ADHD, and family, comorbidity, imaging, and treatment studies corroborate the impact of ADHD in adults. Stimulant therapies, commonly considered first-line therapy in children with ADHD, have a number of drawbacks that have limited their use in adult ADHD. Atomoxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and nonstimulant, was recently approved for the treatment of ADHD in children ≥6 years of age, in adolescents, and in adults. As the first new therapeutic entity to be developed exclusively for ADHD in the last 35 years, its selectivity, extended pharmacodynamic action, and lack of abuse potential is likely to change the landscape of intervention and bring effective therapy to a wider range of individuals suffering from ADHD.
Article
Objective: Despite growing interest in adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), little is known about its prevalence or correlates. Method: A screen for adult ADHD was included in a probability subsample (N=3,199) of 18-44-year-old respondents in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, a nationally representative household survey that used a lay-administered diagnostic interview to assess a wide range of DSM-IV disorders. Blinded clinical follow-up interviews of adult ADHD were carried out with 154 respondents, oversampling those with positive screen results. Multiple imputation was used to estimate prevalence and correlates of clinician-assessed adult ADHD. Results: The estimated prevalence of current adult ADHD was 4.4%. Significant correlates included being male, previously married, unemployed, and non-Hispanic white. Adult ADHD was highly comorbid with many other DSM-IV disorders assessed in the survey and was associated with substantial role impairment. The majority of cases were untreated, although many individuals had obtained treatment for other comorbid mental and substance-related disorders. Conclusions: Efforts are needed to increase the detection and treatment of adult ADHD. Research is needed to determine whether effective treatment would reduce the onset, persistence, and severity of disorders that co-occur with adult ADHD.
Article
Using family study methodology and assessments made by blind raters, this study evaluated family-genetic and psychosocial risk factors for DSM-III attention deficit disorder (ADD) among the 457 first-degree relatives of clinically referred children and adolescents with ADD (N = 73), compared with psychiatric (N = 26) and normal controls (N = 26). Relatives of ADD probands had a higher morbidity risk for ADD (25.1% versus 5.3% versus 4.6%, ps less than 0.00001), antisocial disorders (25.3% versus 6.9% versus 4.2%, ps less than 0.00001), and mood disorders (27.1% versus 13.9%, p = 0.038 and 27.1% versus 3.6%, p = 0.00001) than did relatives of psychiatric and normal controls. The increased risk for ADD could not be accounted for by gender or generation of relative, the age of proband, social class, or the intactness of the family. These results confirm and extend previous findings indicating important family-genetic risk factors in ADD.
Article
Concerns have been raised regarding the validity of the diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults. The purpose of this report is to evaluate critically whether this diagnosis in adults meets acceptable standards for diagnostic validity. A systematic search was conducted of the psychiatric and psychological literature for empirical studies dealing with adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder with childhood onset. These studies were examined for evidence of descriptive, predictive, and concurrent validity. The literature shows that this disorder can be reliably diagnosed in adults and that the diagnosis confers considerable power to forecast complications and treatment response. In addition, evidence is mounting for genetic transmission, specific treatment responses, and abnormalities in brain structure and function in affected individuals. Evidence from the literature is increasingly pointing to the validity of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.