Content uploaded by Evangelos P. Favvas
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Evangelos P. Favvas
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY-NC 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
25
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 1 (2008) 25- 27
Lecture Note
What is spinodal decomposition?
E. P. Favvas*, 1 and A. Ch. Mitropoulos2
1Institute of Physical Chemistry, NCSR “Demokritos”, 153 10 Ag.Paraskevi, Attikis,Greece.
2Department of Petroleum Technology, Kavala Institute of Technology, 65 404 St.Lucas, Kavala, Greece.
Received 17 January 2008; Accepted 20 February 2008
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Abstract
Abstract: Phase separation may occur in a way that the growth is not in extent but in amplitude. Only in the unstable region such a
procedure is thermodynamically feasible. In a phase diagram the unstable region is defined by the spinodal. When a system has
crossed this locus, phase separation occurs spontaneously without the presence of a nucleation step. This process is known as spinodal
decomposition and commonly results to a high interconnectivity of the two phases. The Cahn-Hilliard equation describes the kinetics
of the process. In this note both processes (nucleation and spinodal) are depicted schematically.
Keywords: spinodal decomposition, nucleation and growth.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
A pair of partially miscible liquids, i.e. liquids that do not
mix in all proportions at all temperatures, shows in a tem-
perature-composition diagram a miscibility gap where phase
separation occurs. Gibbs [1] showed that the condition for
stability (or metastability) in respect to continuous change of
phase is that the second derivative of the free energy of mix-
ing to be positive. If negative, the system is unstable. If zero,
the spinodal is defined. The free energy of mixing, ΔGmix,
has the following general form:
mixmixmix S T HG Δ −Δ =Δ . (1)
For the regular solution model [2] the entropy of mixing is
the same as for the ideal mixing; ΔSmix=-R(XAlnXA+XlnXB),
where XA and XB are the molar fractions of components A
and B in the mixture (XA+XB=1). However, the enthalpy of
mixing may be written as ΔHmix=XAXBβ, where β is an in-
teraction parameter lumping the energy of mixing contribu-
tion [3]. Under these assumptions, eq.(1) becomes:
()
BB A ABA
mix XX X X R TX XG lnln ++= Δ
β
. (2)
Figure 1. A phase diagram with a miscibility gap (lower frame) and a
diagram of the free energy change (upper frame). The phase diagram is
the temperature versus the molar fraction of a component e.g. xB. Note
that the diagram is symmetrical around xB=0.5 which is the case of the
regular solution model. Line (1) is the phase boundary. Above this line
the two liquids are miscible and the system is stable (s). Below this line
there is a metastable region (m). Within that region the system is stable
to small fluctuations but is unstable to large fluctuations. Line (2) is the
spinodal. Below this line the system is unstable (u). Regions (m) and (u)
constitute the miscibility gap. Within that gap the system turns from one
phase to a two-phase system. Temperature (Tc) is the upper consolute
temperature. Above this temperature the two liquids are miscible in all
proportions. At a given temperature (T) the tie line (4) cuts the phase
boundary and the spinodal at points (a, c) and (b, d), respectively. The
changes in the free energy of mixing (ΔG), at this given temperature, in
respect to xB are shown by line (3) in the upper frame. Segments (ab)
and (cd) correspond to a positive second derivative of ΔG, ∂2ΔG/xB2>0,
while segment (bd) to a negative one, ∂2ΔG/xB2<0. At points (b) and (d)
∂2ΔG/xB2=0.
J
estr
JOURNAL OF
Engineering Science and
Technology Review
www.
j
estr.or
g
______________
* E-mail address: favvas@chem.demokritos.gr
ISSN: 1791-2377 © 2008 Kavala Institute of Technology. All rights reserved.
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 1 (2008) 25- 27
Lecture Note
What is spinodal decomposition?
E. P. Favvas*, 1 and A. Ch. Mitropoulos2
1Institute of Physical Chemistry, NCSR “Demokritos”, 153 10 Ag.Paraskevi, Attikis,Greece.
2Department of Petroleum Technology, Kavala Institute of Technology, 65 404 St.Lucas, Kavala, Greece.
Received 17 January 2008; Accepted 20 February 2008
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Abstract
Abstract: Phase separation may occur in a way that the growth is not in extent but in amplitude. Only in the unstable region such a
procedure is thermodynamically feasible. In a phase diagram the unstable region is defined by the spinodal. When a system has
crossed this locus, phase separation occurs spontaneously without the presence of a nucleation step. This process is known as spinodal
decomposition and commonly results to a high interconnectivity of the two phases. The Cahn-Hilliard equation describes the kinetics
of the process. In this note both processes (nucleation and spinodal) are depicted schematically.
Keywords: spinodal decomposition, nucleation and growth.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
A pair of partially miscible liquids, i.e. liquids that do not
mix in all proportions at all temperatures, shows in a tem-
perature-composition diagram a miscibility gap where phase
separation occurs. Gibbs [1] showed that the condition for
stability (or metastability) in respect to continuous change of
phase is that the second derivative of the free energy of mix-
ing to be positive. If negative, the system is unstable. If zero,
the spinodal is defined. The free energy of mixing, ΔGmix,
has the following general form:
mixmixmix S T HG Δ −Δ =Δ . (1)
For the regular solution model [2] the entropy of mixing is
the same as for the ideal mixing; ΔSmix=-R(XAlnXA+XlnXB),
where XA and XB are the molar fractions of components A
and B in the mixture (XA+XB=1). However, the enthalpy of
mixing may be written as ΔHmix=XAXBβ, where β is an in-
teraction parameter lumping the energy of mixing contribu-
tion [3]. Under these assumptions, eq.(1) becomes:
()
BB A ABA
mix XX X X R TX XG lnln ++= Δ
β
. (2)
Figure 1. A phase diagram with a miscibility gap (lower frame) and a
diagram of the free energy change (upper frame). The phase diagram is
the temperature versus the molar fraction of a component e.g. xB. Note
that the diagram is symmetrical around xB=0.5 which is the case of the
regular solution model. Line (1) is the phase boundary. Above this line
the two liquids are miscible and the system is stable (s). Below this line
there is a metastable region (m). Within that region the system is stable
to small fluctuations but is unstable to large fluctuations. Line (2) is the
spinodal. Below this line the system is unstable (u). Regions (m) and (u)
constitute the miscibility gap. Within that gap the system turns from one
phase to a two-phase system. Temperature (Tc) is the upper consolute
temperature. Above this temperature the two liquids are miscible in all
proportions. At a given temperature (T) the tie line (4) cuts the phase
boundary and the spinodal at points (a, c) and (b, d), respectively. The
changes in the free energy of mixing (ΔG), at this given temperature, in
respect to xB are shown by line (3) in the upper frame. Segments (ab)
and (cd) correspond to a positive second derivative of ΔG, ∂2ΔG/xB2>0,
while segment (bd) to a negative one, ∂2ΔG/xB2<0. At points (b) and (d)
∂2ΔG/xB2=0.
J
estr
JOURNAL OF
Engineering Science and
Technology Review
www.
j
estr.or
g
______________
* E-mail address: favvas@chem.demokritos.gr
ISSN: 1791-2377 © 2008 Kavala Institute of Technology. All rights reserved.
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 1 (2008) 25- 27
Lecture Note
What is spinodal decomposition?
E. P. Favvas*, 1 and A. Ch. Mitropoulos2
1Institute of Physical Chemistry, NCSR “Demokritos”, 153 10 Ag.Paraskevi, Attikis,Greece.
2Department of Petroleum Technology, Kavala Institute of Technology, 65 404 St.Lucas, Kavala, Greece.
Received 17 January 2008; Accepted 20 February 2008
___________________________________________________________________________________________
Abstract
Abstract: Phase separation may occur in a way that the growth is not in extent but in amplitude. Only in the unstable region such a
procedure is thermodynamically feasible. In a phase diagram the unstable region is defined by the spinodal. When a system has
crossed this locus, phase separation occurs spontaneously without the presence of a nucleation step. This process is known as spinodal
decomposition and commonly results to a high interconnectivity of the two phases. The Cahn-Hilliard equation describes the kinetics
of the process. In this note both processes (nucleation and spinodal) are depicted schematically.
Keywords: spinodal decomposition, nucleation and growth.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
A pair of partially miscible liquids, i.e. liquids that do not
mix in all proportions at all temperatures, shows in a tem-
perature-composition diagram a miscibility gap where phase
separation occurs. Gibbs [1] showed that the condition for
stability (or metastability) in respect to continuous change of
phase is that the second derivative of the free energy of mix-
ing to be positive. If negative, the system is unstable. If zero,
the spinodal is defined. The free energy of mixing, ΔGmix,
has the following general form:
mixmixmix S T HG Δ −Δ =Δ . (1)
For the regular solution model [2] the entropy of mixing is
the same as for the ideal mixing; ΔSmix=-R(XAlnXA+XlnXB),
where XA and XB are the molar fractions of components A
and B in the mixture (XA+XB=1). However, the enthalpy of
mixing may be written as ΔHmix=XAXBβ, where β is an in-
teraction parameter lumping the energy of mixing contribu-
tion [3]. Under these assumptions, eq.(1) becomes:
()
BB A ABA
mix XX X X R TX XG lnln ++= Δ
β
. (2)
Figure 1. A phase diagram with a miscibility gap (lower frame) and a
diagram of the free energy change (upper frame). The phase diagram is
the temperature versus the molar fraction of a component e.g. xB. Note
that the diagram is symmetrical around xB=0.5 which is the case of the
regular solution model. Line (1) is the phase boundary. Above this line
the two liquids are miscible and the system is stable (s). Below this line
there is a metastable region (m). Within that region the system is stable
to small fluctuations but is unstable to large fluctuations. Line (2) is the
spinodal. Below this line the system is unstable (u). Regions (m) and (u)
constitute the miscibility gap. Within that gap the system turns from one
phase to a two-phase system. Temperature (Tc) is the upper consolute
temperature. Above this temperature the two liquids are miscible in all
proportions. At a given temperature (T) the tie line (4) cuts the phase
boundary and the spinodal at points (a, c) and (b, d), respectively. The
changes in the free energy of mixing (ΔG), at this given temperature, in
respect to xB are shown by line (3) in the upper frame. Segments (ab)
and (cd) correspond to a positive second derivative of ΔG, ∂2ΔG/xB2>0,
while segment (bd) to a negative one, ∂2ΔG/xB2<0. At points (b) and (d)
∂2ΔG/xB2=0.
J
estr
JOURNAL OF
Engineering Science and
Technology Review
www.
j
estr.or
g
______________
* E-mail address: favvas@chem.demokritos.gr
ISSN: 1791-2377 © 2008 Kavala Institute of Technology. All rights reserved.
26
E. P. Favvas and A. Ch. Mitropoulos/ Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 1 (2008) 25-27
Figure 2 (left). The nucleation and growth process. The columns repre-
sent two adjacent local regions in the solution denoted as “left” and
“right” and the rows five stages of the system denoted by numbers 1, 2,
3, 4, 5; where the first three stages show what will happen when a small
fluctuation occurs and the last two when a large fluctuation takes place.
Black dots represent one of the two components e.g. B. In the 1st row
the solution has been brought in to the metastable region and at the
moment there is not difference in the local concentrations; CBleft=CBright.
In the 2nd row an infinitesimal fluctuation causes a concentration differ-
ence, such as CBleft>CBright, and therefore diffusion is expected to take
place between left and right localities. In the 3rd row the expected diffu-
sion results to CBleft=CBright. Diffusion takes place from left to right i.e.
from higher to lower concentration (down-hill) and the system comes
back to what is depicted on the first row. In the 4th row a large fluctua-
tion causes the formation of a nucleus of a critical size. For presentation
reasons, the figure was drawn such as all component B on the left region
is spent to form that nucleus; therefore CBleft=0<CBright. Down-hill diffu-
sion takes place now from right to left; note, that the higher concentra-
tion is on the right, the nucleus does not intervene. Once some B reach-
es to the left is arrested by the nucleus that grows (5th row). Phase sepa-
ration occurring in this way is known as nucleation and growth and the
fingerprint of that mechanism is the formation of a nucleus.
Figure 3 (right). The spinodal decomposition process. The columns
denoted as “left” and “right” represent two adjacent local regions in the
solution and the rows denoted by numbers “1, 2, 3, 4, 5,” represent five
stages of the system. Black dots represent one of the two components
e.g. B. Note that rows 4 and 5 represent some final stages of the process.
The drawing on the 4th row is produced by repeating the 3rd row to an x-
y plane. The 5th row is produced from the 4th row by artwork. The col-
umn denoted as “density” represents the density profile of the system at
a given stage. In the 1st row the solution has been brought, very care-
fully, in to the unstable region. This carefulness is shown in a way that
there is not difference in the local concentrations; CBleft=CBright. Since
there is not concentration gradient, no diffusion between left and right
takes place; the solution remains at the moment one-phase system. The
density of the system at this stage has a flat profile equal to an average
value, let say ρο. In the 2nd row an infinitesimal fluctuation causes a
concentration difference, such as CBleft>CBright, and therefore diffusion is
expected to take place between left and right localities. The density of
the system has now a wavy profile with maxima and minima around the
average density. In the third row the expected diffusion process results
to CBleft>>CBright, however. Diffusion does not take place from left to
right i.e. from higher to lower concentration (downhill), but oppositely
from right to left i.e. from lower to higher concentration (uphill). Note
that if diffusion was taken place normally from left to right (downhill) it
would result to CBleft=CBright; i.e. the system would be gone back to what
is depicted on the first row. This can not be happened because is the
case of a stable system; i.e. contradicts the initial statement that the
system is already in the unstable region (compare also with Fig.2 to see
the difference). The density is large in extent but small in degree; the
arrows show the diffusion direction. As diffusion progresses the density
increases until it reaches a point where becomes equal to the density of
pure B (rows 3-5). Phase separation that occurs in this way is known as
spinodal decomposition and the fingerprint of that mechanism is the
uphill diffusion.
The miscibility-gap and spinodal-region boundaries are ob-
tained by calculating the first and second derivatives of the
free energy, respectively, and setting them equal to zero.
BA
BA
cXX
XX
T
T
lnln
2−
−
=; BA
c
XX
T
T4=; R
Tc2
β
=. 3)
(
In Fig.1 (upper frame) it can be seen that the first deriva-
tive is zero at the two free energy minima corresponding to
the two miscible phases and the second derivative is zero at
the points of inflexion. Also, both derivatives are zero at the
free energy maximum. For a series of temperatures, the lo-
cus of the free energy minima projected on a temperature-
composition diagram defines the phase boundary and the
locus of the points of inflexion the spinodal (see lower frame
in Fig.1). The maxima coincide to the upper consolute tem-
perature Tc at XB=0.5. Phase separation occurs when the
system is within the miscibility gap. If the system is in the
metastable region the mechanism is by nucleation and
26
E. P. Favvas and A. Ch. Mitropoulos/ Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 1 (2008) 25-27
27
E. P. Favvas and A. Ch. Mitropoulos/ Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 1 (2008) 25-27
growth whereas if it is in the unstable region by spinodal
decomposition.
Figure 2 depicts the nucleation and growth mechanism
[4]. Gibbs (Ref.1 p.254) discussed the possibility of the for-
mation of a fluid of different phase within any homogeneous
fluid and showed that the work W required to form (by a
reversible process) an heterogeneous globule in the interior
of a very large mass having initially the uniform phase of the
exterior mass will be:
P rr WΔ − = 32 4
4
πγ π
3, (4)
where γ is the surface ten
d ΔP is the hydrostatic pressure. In the case where a criti-
sion, r is the radius of the nucleus,
an
cal nucleus is formed the first derivative of eq.(4) becomes
zero while the hydrostatic equilibrium is preserved;
ΔP=2γ/rcrit, where rcrit is the radius of the critical nucleus.
When r>rcrit the nucleus grows and when r<rcrit it collapses
because the pressure exerted by the surface is greater than
ΔP. By introducing rcrit in eq.(4) the minimum work Wmin
required to form that critical nucleus is given as:
γπ
2
4r=.
min 3crit (5)
Figure 3 depict
[5]. Cahn and Hilliard [6] utili e the van der Waals equation
W
s the spinodal decomposition mechanism
z
for the energy of binary mixture [7] to develop a model for
spinodal decomposition through Fick’s law of diffusion.
BB
D
B
BC MC
C
f
C2⎪
⎫
⎪
⎧⎞⎛ ∂
∂
where ƒ is the free energy density of homogeneous material
of composition e.g. CB, M is a positive constant [8], and κ is
a positive parameter. The first term on the right hand side of
eq.(6) is the classical diffusion equation where the coeffi-
cient of ∇2CB is the diffusion coefficient D. Since M>0 the
sign of D will be determined by the sign of ∂2ƒ/∂C2B. When
∂2ƒ/∂C2B>0 the solution is stable, D>0, and diffusion (if any)
occurs downhill. When ∂2ƒ/∂C2B<0 the solution has crossed
the spinodal and is unstable, D<0, and diffusion takes place
uphill. It is noted, however, that the second term on the right
hand side of eq.(6) (i.e. the fourth-order term) stabilizes the
system against short distance scale fluctuations when
∂2ƒ/∂C2B<0. Uphill diffusion and consequently spinodal de-
composition requires a large enough distance scale fluctua-
tion (i.e. to move mass over long distances).
In this note an elementary review on the concept of spi-
nodal decomposition was given. The nucleation and growth
mechanism was also presented. Comparing the two proc-
esses it is evident that nucleation is large in degree and small
in extent while spinodal is small in degree and large in ex-
tent. In Fig.2 and 3 the evolution of the density profiles at
various stages of the processes was drawn. It is noted that
spinodal decomposition results to a high interconnectivity of
the two phases. However, the morphology of the resulted
separation is only an indication that spinodal decomposition
has taken place [9]. Nucleation may also produce high inter-
connectivity [10]. Besides, fractal morphology is possible to
be induced by both processes. For instance a fractal flake
that grows is an example of a fractally nucleation process
whereas a twin-dragon Peano curve that thickens is an ex-
ample of a fractally spinodal process [11].
M
t
42
22∇−∇ ⎪
⎭
⎬
⎪
⎩
⎨⎟
⎟
⎠
⎜
⎜
⎝∂
=
∂=
κ
, (6)
______________________________
References
1. J.W.Gibbs, Collected Works, Yale University Press, New H
pp.105-115 and pp.252-258 (1948).
ed, follow
t.Phys. 38, 707 (1985); V.M.Agishev and K.M.Yamaleev,
yss.U.Zav. Fizika 10, 124 (1975); K.R.Mecke and V.Sofonea,
gstaff, and R.J.Charles, J.
Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank Ar-
chimedes research Project and INTERREG-III ‘Hybrid
Technology for separation’ for funding this work.
aven, J.Sta
Iz.V
2. E.A.Guggenheim, Proc.Roy.Soc.A 148, 304 (1935); J.B.Thompson,
Jr., in Researches in Geochemistry, Ed. by P.H.Abelson. John Wiley
and Sons Inc., New York, Vol.2 p.340 (1967).
3. For the ideal solution the enthalpy of mixing is zero.
4. IUPAC definition of nucleation and growth: A process in a phase
transition in which nuclei of a new phase are first form ed by delingen der Koninklijke Nederlandsche Akademie van Wetenschap-
pen te Amsterdam 1, 1 (1893).
8. M is related to the interdiffusion coefficient. For a binary system
JB=−M·∇(μB-μA), where J and μ are respectively the flux and the
the propagation of the new phase at a faster rate; J.B.Clark,
J.W.Hastie, L.H.E.Kihlborg, R.Metselaar, and M.M.Thackeray, Pure
App.Chem. 66, 577 (1994).
5. IUPAC definition of spinodal decomposition: A clustering reaction in
a homogeneous, supersaturated solution (solid or liquid) which is un-
stable against infinitesimal fluctuations in density or composition. The
solution therefore separates spontaneously into two phases, starting
with small fluctuations and proceeding with a decrease in the Gibbs
energy without a nucleation barrier; ibid.
6. J.W.Chan and J.E.Hilliard, J.Chem.Phys. 28, 258 (1958).; J.W.Chan
and J.E.Hilliard, J.Chem.Phys. 31, 688 (1959); see also J.W.Chan,
J.Chem.Phys. 30, 1121 (1959); R.B.Heady and J.W.Chan,
J.Chem.Phys. 58, 896 (1973); J.W.Cahn, Trans.A.IM.E. 242, 166
(1968); J.W.Cahn, Acta Met. 9, 795 (1961); J.W.Cahn and
R.J.Charles, Phys.Chem. Glasses 6, 181 (1965); V.S.Stubican and
A.H.Schultz, J. Amer. Cerum. Soc., 51 290 (1968); A.Noviek-Cohen,
Phys.Rev.E 56, R3761 (1997); J.Zhu, L-Q.Chen, J.Shen, and
V.Tikare, Phys.Rev.E 60, 3564 (1999); C.P.Grant, Com-
mun.Part.Differ.Eq. 18, 453 (1993).
7. J.D.van der Waals, The thermodynamic theory of capillarity flow
under the hypothesis of a continuous variation in density, Verhan-
11.
chemical potential of e.g. the B component and M is the mechanical
mobility. Changes in the concentration are given by taking the diver-
gence of the flux: ∂CB/∂t=−∇·JB.
9. J.W.Cahn, J.Chem.Phys. 42, 93 (1965).
10. W.Haller, J.Chem.Phys. 42, 686 (1965); see also W.Haller,
D.H.Blackburn, J.H.Simmons, F.E.Wa
Amer. Ceram. Soc. 53, 34 (1970); G.R.Srinivasan, I.Tweer,
P.B.Macedo, A.Sarkar, and W.Haller, J.Non-Cryst. Solids 6, 221
(1971); W.Haller, D.H.Blackburn, and J.H.Simmons, J. Amer. Cerum.
Soc., 57 126 (1974).
F.Katsaros, P.Makri. A.Ch.Mitropoulos, N.Kanellopoulos,
U.Keiderling, and A.Wiedenmann, Physica B 234-236, 402 (1997).
27
E. P. Favvas and A. Ch. Mitropoulos/ Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 1 (2008) 25-27