ArticlePDF Available

Helmintofauna de Lithobates brownorum (Anura: Ranidae) en tres localidades del estado de Yucatán, México

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Between July 2004 and June 2005, 84 specimens of Lithobates brownorum (Sanders, 1973) were collected and examined for helminths. Hosts came from 3 localities in the state of Yucatán, Mexico: Celestún (n= 35), Lagunas de Yalahau (n= 33), and Ría Lagartos (n= 16). Twelve helminth taxa were found: 7 nematodes, 4 digeneans, and 1 acanthocephalan. With the exception of Haematoloechus floedae and Megalodiscus temperatus, all helminth taxa found have a Neotropical distribution. Our results differ from those obtained in previous studies dealing with amphibians in Mexico because we found higher richness and abundance of nematodes than digenean species. The relatively low mean intensity and mean abundance values reached by digenean species in this study may be related to the generalist host diet and with the vagility of frogs (from the aquatic to the terrestrial environment or vice versa).
Content may be subject to copyright.
Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 81: 191- 195, 2010
Recibido: 23 septiembre 2008; aceptado: 05 noviembre 2009
Research note
Helminth fauna of Lithobates brownorum (Anura: Ranidae) at three localities in
the state of Yucatán, Mexico
Helmintofauna de Lithobates brownorum (Anura: Ranidae) en tres localidades del estado de
Yucatán, México
Carlos A. Yáñez-Arenas and Sergio Guillén-Hernández*
Departamento de Biología Marina, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Carretera Mérida-Xmatkuil,
Km 15.5. Apartado postal 4-116, Itzimná, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
*Correspondencia: ghernand@uady.mx
Abstract. Between July 2004 and June 2005, 84 specimens of Lithobates brownorum (Sanders, 1973) were collected
and examined for helminths. Hosts came from 3 localities in the state of Yucatán, Mexico: Celestún (n= 35), Lagunas
de Yalahau (n= 33), and Ría Lagartos (n= 16). Twelve helminth taxa were found: 7 nematodes, 4 digeneans, and 1
acanthocephalan. With the exception of Haematoloechus oedae and Megalodiscus temperatus, all helminth taxa found
have a Neotropical distribution. Our results differ from those obtained in previous studies dealing with amphibians in
Mexico because we found higher richness and abundance of nematodes than digenean species. The relatively low mean
intensity and mean abundance values reached by digenean species in this study may be related to the generalist host diet
and with the vagility of frogs (from the aquatic to the terrestrial environment or vice versa).
Key words: parasites, anurans, infection levels.
Resumen. Entre julio del 2004 y junio del 2005, se recolectaron y examinaron 84 ejemplares de Lithobates brownorum
(Sanders, 1973) en busca de helmintos en 3 localidades del estado de Yucatán: Celestún (n= 35), Lagunas de Yalahau (n=
33) y Ría Lagartos (n= 16). Los ejemplares estuvieron parasitados por 12 taxa de helmintos, 7 de nematodos, 4 digéneos
y 1 acantocefalo. Con excepción de Haematoloechus oedae y Megalodiscus temperatus, todos los taxa presentan
distribución neotropical. Nuestros resultados di eren de los obtenidos por otros autores que han reportado más especies
de digéneos que de nematodos en este grupo de hospederos. Los bajos valores de intensidad y abundancia media de los
digéneos encontrados en este estudio pueden estar relacionados con la amplia dieta del hospedero y la vagilidad que éste
presenta entre el medio acuático y el terrestre.
Palabras clave: parásitos, anuros, niveles de infección.
In southern Mexico, Lithobates brownorum (Sanders,
1973) is a widely distributed frog that is commonly found
in and around water bodies throughout the Yucatán
Peninsula (Zaldívar-Riverón et al., 2004). However,
information concerning the helminth parasites associated
to this frog species in the Yucatán Peninsula (Moravec,
et al. 2002; León-Règagnon et al., 2005), or elsewhere in
Mexico (Paredes-León et al. 2008) is scarce. The present
work was aimed at characterizing the helminth fauna
present in L. brownorum specimens collected at 3 different
localities in Yucatán.
From July 2004 to June 2005, L. brownorum
specimens were collected from the following localities: 1),
Celestún, located on the northwest coast of the Yucatán
Peninsula (20°46´, 21°06´ N; 90°11´, 90°25´ W); 2),
Yalahau, an inland lagoon found in the central portion
of the state (20°40´37.3´´, 20°34´59.7´´N, 89°10´49.6´´,
89°15´00.5´´W); and 3), Ría Lagartos (21°32´, 21°34´N;
87°35´, 88°15´W) found on the northeast coast of the
Yucatán Peninsula.
Frogs were captured either by hand or with seine
nets, and specimens were kept alive until parasitological
examination was conducted. Specimens were sacri ced
with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital. All organs
192 Yáñez-Arenas and Guillén-Hernández.- Helminths of Lithobates brownorum
were examined under a stereo-microscope, and helminths
were removed, counted, and identi ed. Standard
techniques were employed to prepare parasite specimens
for microscopic examination (see Lamothe-Argumedo,
1997). Parasite voucher specimens were deposited in the
Colección Nacional de Helmintos (CNHE) of the Instituto
de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
(UNAM), Mexico City. Ecological parameters such as
prevalence, mean intensity, and mean abundance were
calculated following Bush et al. (1997).
A total of 84 L. brownorum specimens were collected
and examined (Celestún, n= 35; Yalahau, n= 33; and Ría
Lagartos, n= 16). Four hundred and forty helminths (296
nematodes, 139 digeneans, and 5 acanthocephalans) were
found, representing 12 taxa (3 of them in larval stage). Seven
taxa were nematodes, 4 digeneans, and 1 acanthocephalan.
Nine of these taxa are recorded for the rst time in Yucatán
(Table 1), and 9 represent new records for L. brownorum
(Langeronia macrocirra Caballero y Bravo-Hollis, 1949,
Megalodiscus temperatus (Stafford, 1923), Aplectana
incerta Caballero, 1949, Foleyellides striatus (Ochoterena
and Caballero, 1932), Rhabdias füelleborni Travassos,
1926, Subulascaris falcaustriformis Texeira de Freitas and
Dobbin, 1957, Contracaecum sp., Physalopteridae gen.
sp., and Oncicola sp.).
The greatest number of helminth taxa was found in
specimens from Celestún, while the lowest numbers of
parasites were found in specimens from Ría Lagartos.
Overall, more nematode species were found than any other
helminth taxonomic group. The greatest prevalence and
mean abundance values were observed for the nematodes
S. falcaustriformis and A. incerta in specimens from
Celestún and Yalahau, respectively. On the other hand,
the digenean L. macrocirra showed the highest prevalence
and mean abundance values for specimens in Ría Lagartos.
Finally, the digeneans G. brownorumae and again L.
macrocirra showed the highest mean intensity values for
specimens from Ría Lagartos; Glypthelmins brownorumae
also was the species with the highest mean intensity value
for specimens from Celestún, and L. macrocirra had
the greatest value for this parameter for specimens from
Yalahau (Table 2).
Previous to this work, only 2 helminth species had
been recorded for L. brownorum in Yucatán (Moravec et
al., 2002; León-Règagnon et al., 2005, Paredes-León et al.,
2008); our study increased this number to 13. Except for
H. oedae and M. temperatus, all helminth species found
have Neotropical distribution. The presence of H. oedae
Table 1. Helminth parasites found in L. brownorum specimens (n= 84) collected at 3 localities in Yucatán, Mexico. RBC= Reserva de
la Biosfera de Celestún, PELY= Parque Estatal Lagunas de Yalahau, RBRL= Reserva de la Biosfera de Ría Lagartos
Helminth RBC PELY RBRL Distribution Hábitat
DIGENEA
Glypthelmins brownorumae Razo-Mendivil, et al. 2004† XX
Neotropical Intestine
Haematoloechus oedae Harwood, 1932 XNearctic Lungs
Langeronia macrocirra Caballero y Bravo-Hollis, 1949* XXX
Neotropical Intestine
Megalodiscus temperatus (Stafford, 1923)*† XNearctic Intestine
ACANTHOCEPHALA
Oncicola sp.* XX
Neotropical Mesentery
NEMATODA
Aplectana incerta Caballero, 1949 *† XXX
Neotropical Intestine
Contracaecum sp. * XXX ? Body cavity
Foleyellides striatus (Ochoterena and Caballero, 1932)*
Caballero, 1935*
XXX
Neotropical Body cavity
Oswaldocruzia subauricularis (Rudolphi 1819) * XNeotropical Intestine
Physalopteridae gen. sp. * XX Body cavity
Rhabdias fülleborni Travassos, 1926 *† XX Neotropical Lungs
Subulascaris falcaustriformis Texeira de Freitas y Dobbin,
1957 * † XXX
Neotropical Intestine
* New host record
† New record in the state of Yucatán.
Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 81: 191- 195, 2010 193
Table 2. Helminth infection levels from L. brownorum specimens collected at 3 localities in Yucatán, Mexico. RBC= Reserva de la
Biosfera de Celestún, PELY= Parque Estatal Lagunas de Yalahau, RBRL= Reserva de la Biosfera de Ría Lagartos. %= Prevalence,
MI= Mean Intensity ± SD, MA=Mean Abundance ± SD
Locality RBC (n=35) PELY (n=33)
DIGENEA % MA (± SE) MI (± SD) % MA (± SD MI (± SD)
Megalodiscus temperatus 2.0 0.02 ( ± 0.16 ) 1 ( ± 0 ) 0.0 0.0 0.0
Haematoloechus oedae 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.03 ( ± 0.17 ) 1.0 ( ± 0.0 )
Langeronia macrocirra 14.0 0.54 ( ± 1.54 ) 3.80 ( ± 2.16 ) 15.0 1.42 ( ± 6.13 ) 9.40 ( ± 14.39 )
Glypthelmins brownorumae 20.0 1.17 ( ± 3.61 ) 5.85 ( ± 6.49 ) 0.0 0.0 0.0
ACANTHOCEPHALA
Oncicola sp. 8.0 0.11 ( ± 0.40 ) 1.33 ( ± 0.57 ) 0.0 0.0 0.0
NEMATODA
Rhabdias fülleborni 20.0 0.80 ( ± 2.38 ) 4.14 ( ± 4.017) 9.0 0.24 ( ± 0.86 ) 2.66 ( ± 1.52 )
Aplectana incerta 5.0 0.14 ( ± 0.69 ) 2.50 ( ± 2.12 ) 39.0 1.54 ( ± 2.39 ) 3.92 ( ± 2.28 )
Foleyellides striatus 14.0 0.42 ( ± 1.24 ) 3.0 ( ± 1.87 ) 6.0 0.09 ( ± 0.38 ) 1.50 ( ± 0.70 )
Subulascaris falcaustriformis 25.0 1.48 ( ± 3.95 ) 5.77 ( ± 6.22 ) 18.0 0.96 ( ± 3.03 ) 5.33 ( ± 5.57 )
Contracaecum sp. 2.0 0.02 ( ± 0.16 ) 1.0 ( ± 0 ) 6.0 0.06 ( ± 0.24 ) 1.0 ( ± 0 )
Oswaldocruzia subauricularis 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.0 0.57 ( ± 1.41 ) 3.16 ( ± 1.72 )
Physalopteridae gen. sp. 8.0 0.20 ( ± 0.75 ) 2.33 ( ± 1.52 ) 15.0 1.27 ( ± 5.41 ) 8.40 ( ± 12.64 )
Locality RBRL (n=16)
DIGENEA % MA (± SD) MI (± SD)
Megalodiscus temperatus 0.0 0.0 0.0
Haematoloechus oedae 0.0 0.0 0.0
Langeronia macrocirra 25.0 1.50 ( ± 2.96 ) 6.0 ( ± 2.82 )
Glypthelmins brownorumae 6.0 0.37 ( ± 1.5 ) 6.0 ( ± 0 )
ACANTHOCEPHALA
Oncicola sp. 6.0 0.06 ( ± 0.25 ) 1.0 ( ± 0.0 )
NEMATODA
Rhabdias fülleborni 0.0 0.0 0.0
Aplectana incerta 18.0 0.75 ( ± 2.04 ) 4.0 ( ± 3.46 )
Foleyellides striatus 12.0 0.43 ( ± 1.31 ) 3.50 ( ± 2.12 )
Subulascaris falcaustriformis 6.0 0.12 ( ± 0.5 ) 2.0 ( ± 0 )
Contracaecum sp. 12.0 0.56 ( ± 1.99 ) 4.50 ( ± 4.94 )
Oswaldocruzia subauricularis 0.0 0.0 0.0
Physalopteridae gen. sp. 0.0 0.0 0.0
194 Yáñez-Arenas and Guillén-Hernández.- Helminths of Lithobates brownorum
in native amphibian species in Yucatán may be due to the
introduction of Lithobates catesbeiana (Shaw, 1802) in the
region for culture purposes (León-Règagnon, et al., 2005).
On the other hand, M. temperatus has a wide distribution
and has been recorded from the southern United States
of America to Costa Rica, where it is a common parasite
of several genera of anurans (Yamaguti, 1971; Bursey
and Golberg, 2005). The widespread distribution of nal
hosts of M. temperatus suggests the presence of a species
complex which needs further research.
Numerous studies have shown that in general more
digeneans species are found in amphibians with either
aquatic or semiaquatic habits, while nematode species
are more common in terrestrial amphibians (Aho, 1990;
Guillén-Hernández et al., 2000; Pérez-Ponce de León et
al., 2000; Paredes-Calderón, et al., 2004; Espínola-Novelo
and Guillén-Hernández, 2008). Overall, results from this
work contradict these ndings; nematode species richness
and mean abundance in L. brownorum were greater
compared to that of digeneans in 2 of the localities (Table
2). This difference in the number of nematode and digenean
species and their relative abundances in L. brownorum
may be due to the speci c biotic and abiotic conditions
present in those localities. A low richness of suitable
invertebrate species acting as intermediate hosts (e.g.,
snails and insects) throughout the life cycle of digeneans
at those localities may explain our results. Nematode
species collected in this study are monoxenous and most
of them infect their host via skin penetration. Amphibians
are generally considered generalist feeders and their diets
usually re ect the availability of suitable prey (Duellman
and Trueb, 1994). In particular, L. brownorum has been
shown to feed on a wide variety of terrestrial and aquatic
arthropods, although it does not show a special preference
for any given item (Ramírez-Bautista and Lemos-Espinal,
2004). Digeneans usually require an aquatic intermediate
host species in addition to a snail species in their life cycle.
The presence of M. temperatus and G. brownorum in this
amphibian species suggests the possibility that it feeds on
its own skin after molting since larval stages (metcercariae)
of these parasites occur in amphibian skin (Smith, 1980);
another possibility is that adults prey on tadpoles.
The relatively low mean intensity and mean abundance
values found for digeneans in this study may be related
to this amphibian’s generalist diet, as well as its mobility
between aquatic and terrestrial habitats. The high
prevalence values observed for nematodes relative to
digeneans suggests that L. brownorum spends a signi cant
amount of time out of the water, resulting in high rates of
nematode recruitment via skin penetration.
Results for L. brownorum, the mostly aquatic host
that we examined in this study and those reported for the
terrestrial hosts C. marinus and C. valliceps in Yucatán
(Espinola-Novelo and Guillén-Hernández, 2008) strongly
differ from results reported in a study which examined
specimens of both terrestrial species and 2 aquatic (L.
berlandieri and L. vaillanti) species closely related to
L. brownorum from Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz (Guillén-
Hernández, 1992; Guillén-Hernández, et al. 2000). These
ndings suggest that digeneans species are an important
component which structures the parasite community of
amphibians in Veracruz, while in Yucatán nematodes
appear to take their place as we found them to be more
species-rich and abundant. Further studies which record
helminth species for other species of amphibians in the
Yucatan Peninsula are necessary to provide insight on this
issue.
We thank Jorge Cerón, Alfredo Barrera, Karla
Rodríguez, Juan Espínola, and Mara Bravo for eld
assistance. The authors also thank Rosario Mata,
David Osorio, and Elizabeth Martínez (Laboratorio
de Helmintología, UNAM) for their assistance in the
identi cation of some helminth species. Financial support
for this study was granted by CONACYT (FOMIX-YUC-
2003-CO3-036) as part of the project titled “Valoración
de la diversidad de helmintos en an bios de tres áreas
protegidas del estado de Yucatán”
Literature cited
Aho, J. M. 1990. Helminth communities of Amphibians and
Reptiles: comparative approaches to understanding patterns
and processes. In Parasites communities: patterns and
processes, G. Esch, A. Bush and J. Aho (eds.). Chapman and
Tall, London. p. 157-196.
Brooks, D., V. León-Règagnon, D. Mclennan and D. Zelmer.
2006. Ecological tting as a determinant of the community
structure of platyhelminth parasites of anurans. Ecology 87:
S76-S85.
Bursey, C. R. and S. R. Golberg. 2005. New species of
Oswaldocruzia (Nematoda: Molineoidea), new species of
Rhabdias (Nematoda: Rhabdiasidae), and other helminthes
of Rana cf. forreri (Anura: Ranidae) from Costa Rica.
Journal of Parasitology 91:600-6005.
Bush, A. O., K. D. Lafferty, J. M. Lotz and A. W. Shostak. 1997.
Parasitology Meets Ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al.
Revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83:575-583.
Duellman, W. E. and L. Trueb. 1986. Biology of amphibians.
The Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimor and London.
670 p.
Espínola-Novelo, J. F. and S. Guillén-Hernández. 2008.
Helminth parasites in C. marinus and C. valliceps (Anura:
Bufonidae) from Lagunas Yalahau, Yucatán, Mexico.
Journal of Parasitology 94:672-674.
Guillén-Hernández, S. 1992. Comunidades de helmintos de
algunos anuros de “Los Tuxtlas”, Veracruz. Thesis, Facultad
Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 81: 191- 195, 2010 195
de Ciencias, UNAM. 90 p.
Guillén-Hernández, S., G. Salgado-Maldonado and R. Lamothe-
Argumedo. 2000. Digeneans (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda)
of seven sympatric species of anurans from Los Tuxtlas,
Veracruz, México. Studies of Neotropical Fauna and
Environment 35:10-13.
Lamothe-Argumedo, R. 1997. Manual de técnicas para preparar
y estudiar los parásitos de animales silvestres. AGT, México,
D.F. 43 p.
León-Règagnon, V., S. Guillén-Hernández and M. A. Arizmendi-
Espinosa. 2005. Intraespeci c variation of Haematoloechus
oedae Harwood, 1932 (Digenea: Plagiorchiidae), from Rana
spp. in North and Central America. Journal of Parasitology
91:915-921.
Moravec, F., E. Mendoza-Franco, C. Vivas-Rodríguez, J.
Vargas-Vázquez and D. González-Solís. 2002. Observations
on seasonal changes in the occurrence and maduration of
ve helminth species in the Pimelodid cat sh, Rhamdia
guatemalensis, in the cenote (=sinkhole) Ixin-há, Yucatán,
Mexico. Acta Societae Zoologicae Bohemia 66:121-140.
Paredes-Calderón, E. L., V. León-Regagnon and L. Garcıía-
Prieto. 2004. Helminth infracommunities of Rana vaillanti
Brocchi (Anura: Ranidae) in Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico.
Journal of Parasitology 90:692-696.
Paredes-León, R., L. García-Prieto, C. Guzmán-Cornejo, V.
León-Regagnon and T. M. Pérez. 2008. Metazoan parasites
of Mexican amphibians and reptiles. Zootaxa 1904:1-166.
Pérez-Ponce de León, G., V. León-Règagnon, L. García-Prieto,
U. Razo Mendivil and A. Sánchez-Álvarez. 2000. Digenean
fauna of amphibians from Central Mexico: Nearctic and
Neotropical In uences. Comparative Parasitology 67:92-
106.
Ramírez-Bautista, A. and J. A. Lemos-Espinal. 2004. Diets of
two syntopic populations of frogs, Rana vaillanti and Rana
brownorum, from a tropical rain forest in southern Veracruz,
México. Southwestern Naturalist 49:316-320.
Razo-Mendivil, U., V. León-Règagnon and G. Pérez-Ponce
de León. 2006. Monophyly and systematic position of
Glypthelmins (Digenea), based on partial lsrDNA sequences
and morphological evidence. Organisms, Diversity &
Evolution 6:308-320.
Smith, J. D. and M. M. Smith. 1980. Frogs as host-parasites
system I. The MacMillan Press LTD, London. 101 p.
Yamaguti, S. 1971. Synopsis of Digenetic Trematodes of
Vertebrates. Vol. I and III. Keigaku Publishing Co. Tokyo,
Japan. 1974 p.
Zaldívar-Riverón, A., V. León-Règagnon and A. Nieto-Montes
de Oca. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of Mexican coastal
frogs (Rana berlandieri group) based on mtDNA sequences.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26:38-49.
... The dominance of digeneans is thought to reflect the close association of these species with aquatic environments. In contrast, the helminth composition reported for species that are more terrestrial (not spending as much time in water), have more species of nematodes than digeneans: such as L. brownorum (Velázquez-Urrieta & León-Règagnon, 2018;Yáñez-Arenas & Guillén-Hernández, 2010); L. tarahumarae (Boulenger, 1917) ; L. cf. forreri (Velázquez-Urrieta & León-Règagnon, 2018); and L. magnaocularis (Frost and Bagnara, 1974) . ...
... Differences in the composition of species of helminths in each locality (β-diversity) is influenced by such factors as feeding habits, characteristics of the habitat, the ecological conditions in which the host develops, and the presence of potential intermediate hosts (Adán-Torres et al., 2018;Bower et al., 2018;Cabrera-Guzmán et al., 2007;Campião et al., 2012Campião et al., , 2014García-Altamirano et al., 1993;Paredes-Calderón et al., 2004;Poulin, 1997;Yáñez-Arenas & Guillén-Hernández, 2010). Furthermore, these conditions may influence the survival of free-living stages of some species of helminths (Adán-Torres et al., 2018;de Sena et al., 2018;Luque et al., 2005;Muzzall, 1991;Muzzall et al., 2001). ...
... The presence or absence of particular species of helminth in each locality can be related to the type of life cycle of the parasite present (Poulin, 1997) and the presence of potential intermediate hosts . The behavior of frogs in their respective localities is also thought to affect β-diversity (Bolek & Coggins, 2003;Espínola-Novelo et al., 2017;Hamann et al., 2006a;McAlpine, 1997;Muzzall & Mychek-Londer, 2014;Romero-Mayén et al., 2016;Santos & Amato, 2010;Yáñez-Arenas & Guillén-Hernández, 2010). Local differences in the strength of these factors, and interactions between the factors present in given localities, generates dissimilarity in the structure of the communities of helminths at local levels, which, combined with local environmental factors, generate β-diversity. ...
Article
Full-text available
The helminth community of Lithobates spectabilis (n =77) was studied from Las Pilas (low altitude) and Metznoxtla (high altitude), Biosphere Reserve Barranca de Metztitlán, Hidalgo, Mexico. Species diversity was compared at the infracommunity and the component community level using Hill numbers, and the beta diversity was calculated. Five species of Digenea, 5 of Nematoda, and 2 of Acanthocephala were found in the frogs from the 2 localities. The species richness of parasites in Las Pilas (9 species) was higher than that of Metznoxtla (7 species). The helminth community in Las Pilas was dominated by nematodes and, in Metznoxtla, it was dominated by digeneans. The most prevalent species in Las Pilas was Foleyellides cf. flexicauda (65% of frogs were infected) and, in Metznoxtla, it was Megalodiscus americanus (76% were infected). Glypthelmins quieta was the species with the highest mean abundance in both localities (Las Pilas = 4.5; Metznoxtla = 11.0). The difference in species composition between the 2 localities was significant (Anosim; R = 0.54, p < 0.05). The differences in the composition of species of helminths between the 2 localities suggest that local environmental conditions are different, which may reflect differences in local host diet.
Article
Acanthocephalans constitute a small taxonomic group related to rotifers and specialized in a parasitic lifestyle. Anurans act as paratenic and definitive hosts and infections always occur trophically. Our objective is to describe and summarize the richness of acanthocephalans in Neotropical anurans. We conducted a literature review in the main research databases, compiling data published until August 2021. We identified 66 articles with records of acanthoceph-alan-anuran association, 53.03% were carried out in Brazil. We detected 108 species of anurans from 11 families parasitized by acanthocephalans. With the exception of Bufonidae, Hylidae and Leptodactylidae, which are relatively well-studied families, interaction with acanthocephalans remains largely unexplored for most anuran species. We found six families of acanthocephalans: Centrorhynchidae, Echinorhynchidae, Oligacanthorhynchidae, Cavisomidae, Neoechinor-hynchidae and Plagiorhynchidae. Centrorhynchidae and Echinorhynchidae presented the largest number of taxa associated with anurans. The largest number of records corresponded to acanthocephalans in the larval stage (cystacanths), for which anurans act as paratenic hosts. We observed a lack of specific taxonomic resolution in the identifications of most reports, because a large part of the records in the larval stage make morphological identification difficult. Brazil, Mexico, Paraguay, Argentina, Ecuador and Peru are the countries with the most records, while Costa Rica, Venezuela, Colombia, Chile and Uruguay exhibited the lowest publication numbers, resulting in gaps in the distribution of acanthocephalans. We expanded the known number of anuran species parasitized by acanthocephalans, compared to the last published review. Overall, we aim to contribute to the understanding of diversity within this intriguing but understudied group.
Article
Acanthocephalans constitute a small taxonomic group related to rotifers and specialized in a parasitic lifestyle. Anurans act as paratenic and definitive hosts and infections always occur trophically. Our objective is to describe and summarize the richness of acanthocephalans in Neotropical anurans. We conducted a literature review in the main research databases, compiling data published until August 2021. We identified 66 articles with records of acanthocephalan-anuran association, 53.03% were carried out in Brazil. We detected 108 species of anurans from 11 families parasitized by acanthocephalans. With the exception of Bufonidae, Hylidae and Leptodactylidae, which are relatively well-studied families, interaction with acanthocephalans remains largely unexplored for most anuran species. We found six families of acanthocephalans: Centrorhynchidae, Echinorhynchidae, Oligacanthorhynchidae, Cavisomidae, Neoechinorhynchidae and Plagiorhynchidae. Centrorhynchidae and Echinorhynchidae presented the largest number of taxa associated with anurans. The largest number of records corresponded to acanthocephalans in the larval stage (cystacanths), for which anurans act as paratenic hosts. We observed a lack of specific taxonomic resolution in the identifications of most reports, because a large part of the records in the larval stage make morphological identification difficult. Brazil, Mexico, Paraguay, Argentina, Ecuador and Peru are the countries with the most records, while Costa Rica, Venezuela, Colombia, Chile and Uruguay exhibited the lowest publication numbers, resulting in gaps in the distribution of acanthocephalans. We expanded the known number of anuran species parasitized by acanthocephalans, compared to the last published review. Overall, we aim to contribute to the understanding of diversity within this intriguing but understudied group.
Article
Full-text available
During 2009 and 2010, 87 specimens of the smooth-backed frog, Lithobates psilonota, from 2 localities (Atenquique and Zapopan) in the state of Jalisco, Mexico, were collected and analyzed for helminths. A total of 816 helminth specimens representing 9 species (7 adults and 2 larvae) were collected. The helminthological record for this host species is composed by 5 digeneans, 3 nematodes, and 1 acanthocephalan. Hosts from both sites shared the nematode Foleyellides sp. and the digeneans Haematoloechus sp., Megalodiscus americanus, and Glypthelmins quieta. On the other hand, Halipegus psilonota, Gorgoderina sp. (Trematoda), Eustrongylides sp., and Rhabdias sp. (Nematoda) were exclusively found in frogs from Atenquique. The acanthocephalan Oncicola sp. was found only in hosts from Zapopan. The most prevalent helminth species in both localities was M. americanus, reaching the highest levels in hosts from Atenquique. The composition of the helminthological record of L. psilonota is compared with those described for the other 8 species of this amphibian genus studied in Mexico; in these host species, the richness ranges from 6 to 21 species and abundance from 194 to 18,434 individuals. Richness and abundance of the parasite community of L. psilonota is dominated by digeneans. Most of the species that parasitize Ranidae hosts in Mexico infect them through ingestion of eggs or larval stages; some others are recruited via penetration or mosquito bite. Finally, the helminth fauna of L. psilonota shows a Nearctic influence coupled with a high percentage of endemic species that suggests an important coevolutionary component in the history of the association of this group of frogs and their helminths. During 2009 and 2010, 87 specimens of the smooth-backed frog, Lithobates psilonota, from 2 localities (Atenquique and Zapopan) in the state of Jalisco, Mexico, were collected and analyzed for helminths. A total of 816 helminth specimens representing 9 species (7 adults and 2 larvae) were collected. The helminthological record for this host species is composed by 5 digeneans, 3 nematodes, and 1 acanthocephalan. Hosts from both sites shared the nematode Foleyellides sp. and the digeneans Haematoloechus sp., Megalodiscus americanus, and Glypthelmins quieta. On the other hand, Halipegus psilonota, Gorgoderina sp. (Trematoda), Eustrongylides sp., and Rhabdias sp. (Nematoda) were exclusively found in frogs from Atenquique. The acanthocephalan Oncicola sp. was found only in hosts from Zapopan. The most prevalent helminth species in both localities was M. americanus, reaching the highest levels in hosts from Atenquique. The composition of the helminthological record of L. psilonota is compared with those described for the other 8 species of this amphibian genus studied in Mexico; in these host species, the richness ranges from 6 to 21 species and abundance from 194 to 18,434 individuals. Richness and abundance of the parasite community of L. psilonota is dominated by digeneans. Most of the species that parasitize Ranidae hosts in Mexico infect them through ingestion of eggs or larval stages; some others are recruited via penetration or mosquito bite. Finally, the helminth fauna of L. psilonota shows a Nearctic influence coupled with a high percentage of endemic species that suggests an important coevolutionary component in the history of the association of this group of frogs and their helminths.
Article
Full-text available
Based on published records and original data, we present a checklist of metazoan parasites of Mexican amphibians and reptiles. This checklist includes information for 430 nominal taxa of metazoan parasites, 371 helminths (137 trematodes, 10 monogeneans, 29 cestodes, 14 acanthocephalans, 173 nematodes, and 8 hirudineans), 51 acari and 8 crustaceans. We add 184 new locality records to Acari. These data represent the current knowledge on metazoan parasites of 68 amphibians and 219 reptile species of Mexico.
Article
Full-text available
Specimens from 20 amphibian species from central Mexico were examined for helminths. We found 21 digenean species; 4 of them are recorded for the first time in Mexico. Twenty-two new host and 21 new locality reports are added. Previous reports of these helminth species are summarized, and biogeographical aspects of hosts and parasites are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Species composition and systematic placement within the order Plagiorchiida has been controversial. Species number in Glypthelmins Stafford, 1905, a genus of cosmopolitan parasites of anurans, has varied between 19 and 28 species, depending on the taxonomic treatment. The present study performs a phylogenetic analysis using partial lsrDNA sequences to test the monophyly of the genus, and compares new sequences obtained with those published for different plagiorchiids to clarify the systematic position of Glypthelmins within the order Plagiorchiida. Maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) analyses result in identical tree topology. The single MP tree (L=1587, CI=0.40, RI=0.76) includes several clades with high bootstrap and Bremer support values. Glypthelmins sensu lato as traditionally classified is paraphyletic. Based on molecular and/or morphological evidence, the taxonomic diagnosis for Glypthelmins is emended, only eight species are retained in the genus, and re-establishment of the genera Choledocystus Pereira & Cuocolo, 1941 and Rauschiella Babero, 1951 is proposed, resulting in the following new combinations: Choledocystus simulans (Teixeira de Freitas, 1941) comb. nov., C. vitellinophilum (Dobbin, 1958) comb. nov.; Rauschiella chaquensis (Mañé-Garzón & Holcman-Spector, 1967) comb. nov., R. lenti (Teixeira de Freitas, 1941) comb. nov., R. linguatula (Rudolphi, 1819) comb. nov., R. poncedeleoni (Razo-Mendivil & León-Règagnon, 2001) comb. nov., R. robusta (Brooks, 1976) comb. nov., R. rugocaudata (Yoshida, 1916) comb. nov., R. staffordi (Tubangui, 1928) comb. nov. In the phylogenetic reconstruction, Glypthelmins sensu stricto forms the sister group of Haematoloechus Looss, 1899.
Article
Full-text available
Digeneans of sympatric Bufo marinus, B. valliceps, Hyla picta, H. ebraccata, Smilisca baudini, Rana berlandieri, and R. vaillanti from Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico, are reported. A total of 7 adult trematode species and 3 unidentified metacercariae was found in the different host species examined: Gorgoderina attenuata, G. parvicava, Cephalogonimus americanus, Haematoloechus medioplexus, Glypthelmins californiensis, Mesocoelium monas and Langeronia macrocirrus. Prevalence, mean intensity and abundance of the trematodes in each host species are given.
Article
Full-text available
We present data on diet of 2 syntopic populations of frogs, Rana vaillanti and R. brownorum collected near the Los Tuxtlas biological field station, Veracruz, Me´xico. Rana vaillanti strictly inhabits ponds, whereas R. brownorum occurs in several microhabitat types. The stomach contents of 26 specimens of R. vaillanti and 22 of R. brownorum were analyzed. Arthropods consumed by R. vaillanti and R. brownorum included 10 and 12 taxa, respectively. The main prey items for R. vaillanti were Diptera (42.3%), decapod crustaceans (16.3%), Mollusca (Stylomatophora, 8.1%), and Orthoptera (8.2%), whereas R. brownorum consumed Orthoptera (22.0%), Coleoptera (20.8%), and Hymenoptera (15.6%). A regression analysis between prey sizes and snout-vent length was significant in R. brownorum, but not in R. vaillanti. Diversity of prey items was higher in R. brownorum than in R. vaillanti.
Article
Full-text available
We consider 27 population and community terms used frequently by parasitologists when describing the ecology of parasites. We provide suggestions for various terms in an attempt to foster consistent use and to make terms used in parasite ecology easier to interpret for those who study free-living organisms. We suggest strongly that authors, whether they agree or disagree with us, provide complete and unambiguous definitions for all parameters of their studies.