ArticlePDF Available

White-clawed crayfish in Ireland - under increasing threat. Pp. 120-128 in: Rees M, Nightingale J, Holdich DM (eds). (2011). Species Survival: Securing white-clawed crayfish in a changing environment. Proceedings of a Conference held on 16th and 17th November 2010 in Bristol, UK.

Authors:
  • Julian Reynolds Associates

Abstract

The occurrence pattern of white-clawed crayfish, Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet 1858), in Ireland is today sharply different from elsewhere in its current range, but more like that in England 50 years ago. Populations of Irish crayfish are widespread particularly in the lime-rich lowlands, north and south, and since first records in the 1700s, most populations in both jurisdictions are stable or slowly declining, for reasons not fully established. Some lake stocks have been extinguished. A single plague outbreak was recorded in the 1980s. Today there is increasing threat from non-indigenous crayfish, which are readily available through the internet trade from within and outside the EU. Legislation to prohibit their import to Ireland is in preparation. The legislation and current conservation approach in Northern Ireland is different to current British approaches, and different from that in the Irish Republic, although equally tied into EC Habitats Directive requirements. Education of customs officials and the public is a priority.
Craysh Conservation
South West
Craysh Conservation
South West
Rees M, Nightingale J, Holdich DM (eds.) (2011). Species Survival: Securing
white-clawed craysh in a changing environment. Proceedings of a conference
held on 16th and 17th November 2010 in Bristol, UK.
WHITE-CLAWED CRAYFISH IN IRELAND - UNDER INCREASING THREAT
Julian D. Reynolds.
Emeritus Fellow, Trinity College, Dublin.
Postal address: 115 Weirview Drive, Stillorgan, Co. Dublin, IRELAND.
e-mail: jreynolds@tcd.ie
ABSTRACT
The occurrence pattern of white-clawed craysh, Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet 1858), in Ireland
is today sharply different from elsewhere in its current range, but more like that in England 50 years ago.
Populations of Irish craysh are widespread particularly in the lime-rich lowlands, north and south, and since
rst records in the 1700s, most populations in both jurisdictions are stable or slowly declining, for reasons not
fully established. Some lake stocks have been extinguished. A single plague outbreak was recorded in the
1980s. Today there is increasing threat from non-indigenous craysh, which are readily available through the
internet trade from within and outside the EU. Legislation to prohibit their import to Ireland is in preparation.
The legislation and current conservation approach in Northern Ireland is different to current British approaches,
and different from that in the Irish Republic, although equally tied into EC Habitats Directive requirements.
Education of customs ofcials and the public is a priority.
Keywords: Austropotamobius pallipes, bioindicator, keystone species, legislation, smuggling, threats, white-
clawed craysh
INTRODUCTION
The occurrence pattern of the white-clawed craysh, Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet 1858), in Ireland
is today sharply different from elsewhere in its current range (Reynolds and Demers 2006, Reynolds 2009),
including Great Britain, although more like England of 50 years ago. Prior to the invasion of non-indigenous
signal craysh, Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana 1852), in Britain, white-clawed craysh were widespread,
and about 15 % of all recorded sites were still-water; chiey reservoirs and water-lled quarries (Jay and
Holdich 1981, Holdich and Reeve 1991). In Ireland, while craysh occupied a comparable range of habitats,
3 2 % of records were from lakes (Reynolds 1982), but the lakes available to and occupied by this species
were up to an order of magnitude larger than in Britain. A single plague outbreak was recorded in the 1980s,
which wiped out most stocks in the Boyne catchment and in some contiguous Shannon tributaries (Matthews
and Reynolds 1992, Matthews et al. 1993). Today, most populations in Northern Ireland and the Republic
of Ireland appear to be stable, or slowly declining for reasons not fully understood (Reynolds et al. 2010a,
Gallagher 2011, pers. comm.).
Apart from geology (lowland Ireland, where craysh are widespread, is Paleozoic, underlain by Carboniferous
limestone) there are several historical reasons that may explain differences between the craysh stocks of
the islands of Ireland and Britain:
1) Craysh have not been a popular food in Ireland, even apparently during famine years, and they do not
gure in Irish folklore (Reynolds 1992, pers. comm., Lucey 2009, pers. comm.). In the 1970s and 1980s a
few people, including some Swedish crayshermen, periodically caught craysh at Pollaphuca (Blessington
Lakes) Reservoir and White Lake, as did others in the country, e.g. a sherman in the Erne and a farmer near
Lough Owel (Matthews 1992, pers. comm.).
120
Irish craysh under increasing threat (Reynolds)
Craysh Conservation
South West
Craysh Conservation
South West
Rees M, Nightingale J, Holdich DM (eds.) (2011). Species Survival: Securing
white-clawed craysh in a changing environment. Proceedings of a conference
held on 16th and 17th November 2010 in Bristol, UK.
2) As a measure to safeguard salmonid stocks, importation of craysh has been prohibited under the Live
Fish (restriction of importation) Order 1972 of the Irish Fisheries (Consolidation) Act 1959. However, the
original 1959 Act appears only to apply to marine crustaceans and so this legislation may not in practice
be enforceable over this issue (http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1959/en/act/pub/0014/index.html). Despite
differences in legislation between the two jurisdictions on the island, they have cooperated in discouraging
the importation of non-indigenous craysh species (NICS).
3) There was no encouragement from the Irish Government to import signal craysh in the 1970s and 1980s,
at a time when this was happening in Britain and elsewhere in Europe. The author was lobbied at that time
by two farmers who had sought to import signals to County Louth, but were refused licences.
Historical records
The origins of Irish craysh stocks are still unclear. Mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite genetic studies
indicate that Irish craysh are rather uniform and were probably derived from western French stocks; it has
been suggested that they may have been brought in by 12th Century Cistercian monks (Reynolds et al.
2002, Gouin et al. 2003). A possible separate origin of Northern Ireland stocks has not yet been established
(Souty-Grosset 2011, pers. comm., Wilson 2011, pers. comm.). Holdich et al. (2009) produced documentary
evidence that craysh were present in Great Britain before 1500 AD and are thus considered indigenous
under IUCN rules. Lucey (1999) cites the rst reference to craysh in Ireland in a 1680 MS that said they
were introduced from England. Two early observers, Rutty (1772) of craysh near Finglas, outside Dublin,
and Thompson (1843) of craysh from the Royal Canal about 12 miles W of Dublin, both attributed their
ndings to introductions. The earliest specimens in the National Museum NMI are 19th century specimens
from three locations around Dublin and there are early 20th century records in the British Museum BMNH from
R. Dodder (1905), again in the vicinity of Dublin.
Most Irish records of craysh are 20th century, generally published either in the Irish Naturalist or The Irish
Naturalists’ Journal (summarized in Reynolds 1982, Lucey and McGarrigle 1987, Reynolds 1997 and Reynolds
et al. 2010a). The rst scientic studies on Irish craysh were by Moriarty (1973) on craysh in White Lake,
Co. Westmeath, and an unpublished report by Watson (1971) on Co. Fermanagh craysh lakes. Moriarty
was interested in the interactions of craysh and eels, and noted that thriving lake populations appeared to
be mostly in eel-free waters.
THE PRESENT SITUATION
Craysh in Irish freshwater ecosystems
Whether indigenous or a medieval or later introduction, white-clawed craysh are now in balance in Irish
freshwater ecosystems, both lakes and rivers. Along with some sh, they act as keystone species, as
detritivores altering the relative proportions of ne and coarse particulate organic matter (FPOM and CPOM)
and selectively feeding on aquatic plants, epibionts, invertebrates and vertebrates (frogs and sh) (Matthews
and Reynolds 1992, Matthews et al. 1993, Reynolds and O’Keeffe 2004, Füreder et al. 2006). They may
further alter the ecosystem by mechanical means – controlling aquatic weed-beds (Reynolds et al. 2002)
and burrowing into banks.
River stocks today
Irish lowland rivers are often characterized by unclear catchment boundaries and articial drainage or canal
links (Reynolds 2009). Recent surveys indicate that craysh remain widespread in many rivers (Demers and
Species Survival: Securing white-clawed craysh in a changing environment
121
Craysh Conservation
South West
Craysh Conservation
South West
Rees M, Nightingale J, Holdich DM (eds.) (2011). Species Survival: Securing
white-clawed craysh in a changing environment. Proceedings of a conference
held on 16th and 17th November 2010 in Bristol, UK.
Reynolds 2003). Craysh are routinely encountered during sh and macroinvertebrate surveys by agencies
such as Inland Fisheries Ireland (IFI) (King 2011, pers. comm.) and in water quality investigations by
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) staff (Lucey 2011, pers. comm.) and by environmental consultants,
and thus are well known. Byrne et al. (1999) published a sampling methodology for streams, since modied
by other workers: monitoring today generally follows Peay (2003). The current picture for the Republic of
Ireland (ROI) indicates that craysh are still widespread (Demers et al. 2005, NPWS 2008, Reynolds et al.
2010a), with some recoveries from the plague outbreak, a range extension in the south (Lucey 2010) and
some declines (e.g. Lyons and Kelly-Quinn 2003), while in Northern Ireland (NI), Gallagher et al. (2006)
describe the environmental requirements for river craysh. Craysh are known from the Erne, Blackwater
and Ballinderry systems (Gallagher 2002), and there have been more recent unpublished surveys (Early
2011, pers. comm., Gallagher 2011, pers. comm.) including the Ballinderry catchment (Wilson and Horton
2008).
Lake stocks today
A number of individual lake stocks of white-clawed craysh have been studied, e.g. in White Lake (Moriarty
1973, O’Keeffe, 1986), L. Lene (Matthews 1992, Matthews et al. 1993, Reynolds and Matthews 1993, 1997),
Blessington Lakes (Pollaphuca Reservoir) (Matthews and Reynolds 1995), and there have been several
studies in NI lakes (e.g. Watson 1971, Gallagher 2002) including the Magheraveely Marl Lakes SAC (Bradley
2008). Sampling methods are described by O’Connor et al. (2009) and Reynolds et al. (2010b, 2010c).
Lake stocks, being more or less isolated, are vulnerable to extinction, and deserve closer study. Plague is
believed to have wiped out several lake stocks in 1985-88 (White Lake, Lough Bane, Lough Glore, Lough
Lene in the Irish midlands). There is anecdotal information about other midlands lake stocks in trouble or lost,
e.g. from L. Owel, L. Ennell, L. Sheelin and Pallas L. Of 26 ROI lakes where craysh had been recorded,
stocks are still present in 15 (O’Connor et al. 2009, Reynolds et al. 2010c), and there are also declines and
stock losses in NI lakes (Bradley 2008, Early 2011, pers. comm.).
Lough Owel provides an example of recent craysh mortalities. Craysh population expansions and
contractions have been periodically noted in this clear water lime-rich midlands lake since the 1970s (Champ
2010, pers. comm.), including a major incident in the 1980s linked to the plague outbreak (Reynolds and
Matthews 1996). In 2007 a snorkeler observed abundant craysh in Lough Owel, but in May 2010 when he
returned to take photos of craysh, he found low visibility and lamentous algae covering the bottom. He
reported seeing hundreds of dead craysh, and very few living. His video may be seen at http//underwater-
ireland.com/article.htm.
This evidence was conicting, however. It was suggested that given the time of year of the occurrence, some
of these ‘dead craysh’ could be exuviae that had accumulated in one area. However, others were clearly
egg-bearing dead females. A survey commissioned by the NPWS found plentiful craysh in Lough Owel in
June and again in September 2007, and a further video in October 2010 showed healthy craysh and stands
of Chara, so if this was a kill, it appeared to be localized (Reynolds et al. 2010c). Clearly, closer study is
needed to understand the lake and its craysh stocks.
The threat from NICS and recent sightings of NICS in Ireland
Not all reports of craysh in Ireland have been accepted as indigenous (ICS). Lucey and McGarrigle (1987)
note a personal communication from C. Moriarty that reports of the European noble craysh, Astacus astacus
(Linnaeus 1758), have not been authenticated for Ireland. When interest in farming exotic craysh was rst
high in Great Britain, Reynolds (1979) advised against their importation to Ireland, fearing the displacement
of white-clawed craysh through competition as well as the possibility of plague introduction. However, while
the legislation has been effective so far, it needs to prohibit all exotic craysh if the risk of plague, north and
122
Irish craysh under increasing threat (Reynolds)
Craysh Conservation
South West
Craysh Conservation
South West
Rees M, Nightingale J, Holdich DM (eds.) (2011). Species Survival: Securing
white-clawed craysh in a changing environment. Proceedings of a conference
held on 16th and 17th November 2010 in Bristol, UK.
south, is to be averted. Only ve craysh species are listed on the draft NI legislation (Early 2011, pers.
comm.). However, there are already six NICS inhabiting waters in Britain (Holdich and Sibley 2009), and
despite stringent legislation this has not stopped them spreading. Recent risk assessments have shown that
most have the capability to be highly invasive (Peay et al. 2010).
Some of the currently high levels of activity and interest in NICS being shown in Britain (Holdich and Sibley
2009) have engendered a correspondingly heightened awareness about the potential threat to white-clawed
craysh of NICS importation into Ireland. In 2009 a TV Chef came to Belfast to publicize craysh cooking,
saying that his raw material was local signals from Lough Neagh (Early 2011, pers. comm.). It is feared
that tightening legislation in Britain may lead to activity of trapping and smuggling signals being directed into
Ireland (Peay 2010, pers. comm.). Government-funded projects such as such as Invasive Species Ireland,
www.invasivespeciesireland.com, have been working to increase knowledge and awareness of established
and potential invasives.
Recently, there have been several reported sightings of NICS in Ireland, North and South. Northern Ireland
has had at least two false alarms since 2007, both from the Ulster Blackwater River. Both sightings were
from anglers who claimed to be familiar with signal craysh. On each occasion baited traps were shed over
several weeks at the report sites, but only white-clawed craysh of all age ranges and sexes were trapped.
(Early 2010, pers. comm.).
In ROI there was a NICS alarm in 2010 from the R. Barrow, accompanied by a photo of the dorsal side of
a craysh claw found in a tributary of the R. Barrow. Responders commented on the large claw teeth and
extreme rugosity. One suggested identication, based on a photograph in a British ID sheet, was that it
looked like the spiny-cheek craysh, Orconectes limosus (Ranesque 1817), adding ‘It could just be shing
bait - do we know if that sort of bait would be used to sh in that area?’ Another response said that it
looked like stone craysh, Austropotamobius torrentium (Schrank 1803). However, David Holdich and Julian
Reynolds considered that it was most probably A. pallipes, and Catherine Souty-Grosset arrived at the same
conclusion, having eliminated the most likely non-indigenous species. Again, subsequent searches only
found white-clawed craysh. These events underline the interest in craysh, the dangers of introductions,
and the problems of unfamiliarity with craysh material for professionals likely to be tasked with identication.
A website with many photographs of exotic craysh is in preparation (O’Neill 2011, pers. comm.) and
permanent collections of preserved craysh of the species currently present in Europe should be a priority.
In August 2010 the author received an e-mail from a sh fancier concerned that there are numbers of craysh
being brought into the country. He suggested that customs and/or the Department of Agriculture are not
systematically checking deliveries from inside the EU for non-indigenous species, although the multitude
of species introduced into EU countries over the years is well known and it is therefore as likely that non-
indigenous species may be introduced to Ireland from within the EU as from their country of origin. He noted
that red swamp craysh, Procambarus clarkii (Girard 1852), is widely available from aquarists in Ireland; ‘they
come in from the Czech Republic, and Customs does not check anything trans-shipped from within the EU’.
In this context Chucholl (2010) has shown that in Germany at present, over 100 NICS originating from North
America are available as ornamental aquarium species, each one probably capable of transmitting craysh
plague. Holdich et al. (2009) have reviewed the threat to ICS in Europe from NICS and have shown that ICS
in most countries are affected.
A discussion thread on the website www.irishshforum.com also deals with the ease of bringing in craysh
from within the EU. The people on the forum are for the most part not only concerned about their sh but are
also keenly interested in preserving wildlife in this country. The desire for education is clearly demonstrated
and, following this, the author posted a thread on the website with some details about the current legal and
conservation situation with regard to importation of craysh. Similar postings have also been placed on other
websites.
Species Survival: Securing white-clawed craysh in a changing environment
123
Craysh Conservation
South West
Craysh Conservation
South West
Rees M, Nightingale J, Holdich DM (eds.) (2011). Species Survival: Securing
white-clawed craysh in a changing environment. Proceedings of a conference
held on 16th and 17th November 2010 in Bristol, UK.
DISCUSSION
The threat from NICS
NICS are increasingly likely to be introduced to Ireland, by accidental or intentional means, wherever the
media message has not hit home. The main threats come from the general public, unaware that UK law is
different in NI from that in Britain; from aquarists importing through the internet (see above); from soft-hearted
citizens who might dispose of ailing craysh or multiplying pets (e.g. the parthenogenetic marbled craysh
or marmorkrebs, Procambarus sp.) or those that get too large (e.g. Cherax spp.) into the wild; from Foodies
keen to ‘eat to beat’ (one chef even cooking signal craysh for TV in Belfast with the statement that they came
from Lough Neagh); and from shermen, of whom an increasing foreign component is less aware of local
regulations and more convinced of what they think ‘should be’ in water. Another threat is the introduction of
plague by various possible means, such as damp shing gear, water with farmed sh, or movement of birds.
Education and conservation
The Craynet project has emphasized the importance of education in several publications. For example, Puky
et al. (2002) showed great variability in knowledge about craysh across European countries. At that time
Ireland and Croatia had the lowest levels of knowledge. The evidence shows that even in groups dedicated
to protection of indigenous stocks, the ability to identify NICS and ICS may be insufcient. There is a clear
need for education, especially for those with statutory responsibility for craysh to be able to identify them,
and awareness campaigns for other stakeholders and the general public.
Relevant actions
Conservation activities, and priorities for action, are different in NI and ROI, and the current Irish conservation
approach therefore differs from current British approaches, though each is equally tied into EC Habitats
Directive requirements.
In NI, current emphases include the development of ark sites (Horton 2009), while in ROI there is an
emphasis on population monitoring. A recommendation for NI would be renewed vigilance to curb smugglers
who may seek alternative markets for UK signals. In both NI and ROI, emphases should be on controlling
internet aquarium trade and the movement and sale of live materials from within the EU, the education of
professionals and ofcials, and an alert public. A modern hatchery in NI has the potential to rear juveniles
from different strains (Policar et al. 2010), which could be the basis of a restocking programme for SACs
depleted or lacking craysh stocks.
Of the two main threats, an outbreak of craysh plague would certainly devastate many stocks, but slow
recovery has been shown to be possible. However, an invasion of NICS, either North or South, would mean
the rapid and irreparable extinction of nearly all Irish white-clawed craysh stocks. The message is clear
and strong – never introduce living craysh, for whatever reasons. It remains to be seen how we make this
message stick, and how best to train people to implement current legislation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My thanks to present and former co-workers and to all those who answered my queries, most of whom are
indicated as ‘personal communication’. I am particularly grateful to Mary Gallagher, for providing information
for NI and to John Early, Christopher Moriarty and Brian Nelson for commenting on a draft of this paper.
124
Irish craysh under increasing threat (Reynolds)
Craysh Conservation
South West
Craysh Conservation
South West
Rees M, Nightingale J, Holdich DM (eds.) (2011). Species Survival: Securing
white-clawed craysh in a changing environment. Proceedings of a conference
held on 16th and 17th November 2010 in Bristol, UK.
REFERENCES
Bradley P (2008). Population status of white-clawed craysh (Austropotamobius pallipes Lereboullet) at
Magheraveely Marl Lakes SAC. Unpublished report to ENSIS Ltd and Northern Ireland Environmental
Agency (Environment and Heritage Service).
Byrne CF, Lynch JM and Bracken JJ (1999). A sampling strategy for stream populations of white-clawed
craysh Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet) (Crustacea, Astacidae). Proceedings of the Royal Irish
Academy, Biology and Environment 99B(2): 89-94.
Champ T (2010). Inland Fisheries Ireland, Swords, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Personal communication.
Chucholl C (2010). Invaders for sale: does the ornamental freshwater craysh trade constitute an actual
and overlooked risk? Poster presentation at European Craysh: Food, Flagships and Ecosystem Services
Conference, Poitiers 26-29 October 2010.
Demers A and Reynolds JD (2003). The distribution of the white-clawed craysh, Austropotamobius pallipes,
in eight catchments in Ireland in relation to water quality. In: Management and Conservation of craysh (DM
Holdich and PJ Sibley, eds.), pp 94-103. Environment Agency, Bristol, England.
Demers A, Lucey J, McGarrigle ML and Reynolds JD (2005). The distribution of the white-clawed craysh,
Austropotamobius pallipes, in Ireland. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, Biology and Environment
105B(2): 65-69.
Early J (2010). Northern Ireland Environmental Agency, Belfast, Northern Ireland. Personal communication.
Early J (2011). Northern Ireland Environmental Agency, Belfast, Northern Ireland. Personal communication.
Füreder L, Edsman L, Holdich D, Kozak P, Machino Y, Pöckl M, Renai B, Reynolds J, Schulz H, Sint D,
Taugbøl T, Trouilhé MC (2006). Indigenous craysh habitats and threats. In: Atlas of Craysh in Europe
C Souty-Grosset, DM Holdich, PY Noël, JD Reynolds and P Haffner, eds.), pp. 26-47. Patrimoines naturels
64, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France.
Gallagher MB (2002). The ecology and behaviour of Austropotamobius pallipes. PhD thesis. The Queen’s
University, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Gallagher MB (2011). Department of the Environment Northern Ireland, UK. Personal communication.
Gallagher MB, Dick JTA and Elwood RW (2006). Riverine habitat requirements of the white-clawed craysh,
Austropotamobius pallipes. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, Biology and Environment 106B(2): 1-8.
Gouin N, Grandjean F, Pain D, Souty-Grosset C and Reynolds J (2003). Origin and colonization history of
the white-clawed craysh, Austropotamobius pallipes, in Ireland. Heredity 91(1): 70-77.
Holdich DM, Palmer M and Sibley PJ (2009). The indigenous status of Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet)
in Britain. In: Craysh conservation in the British Isles (J Brickland, DM Holdich and EM Imhoff, eds.), pp.
1-11. Proceedings of a Conference held on 25th March 2009 in Leeds, UK.
Holdich DM. and Reeve ID (1991). The distribution of freshwater craysh in the British Isles with particular
reference to craysh plague, alien introductions and water quality. Aquatic Conservation 1(2): 139-158.
Species Survival: Securing white-clawed craysh in a changing environment
125
Craysh Conservation
South West
Craysh Conservation
South West
Rees M, Nightingale J, Holdich DM (eds.) (2011). Species Survival: Securing
white-clawed craysh in a changing environment. Proceedings of a conference
held on 16th and 17th November 2010 in Bristol, UK.
Holdich DM, Reynolds JD, Souty-Grosset C and Sibley PJ (2009). A review of the ever increasing threat
to European craysh from non-indigenous craysh species. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic
Ecosystems 394-395: 46 pp. DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2009025.
Holdich DM and Sibley P J (2009). ICS and NICS in Britain in the 2000s. In: Craysh conservation in the
British Isles. (J Brickland, DM Holdich and EM Imhoff, eds.), pp. 13-33. Proceedings of a conference held
on 25th March 2009 in Leeds, UK.
Horton MP (2009). Establishing the island of Ireland’s rst ark site for the white-clawed craysh
Austropotamobius pallipes in the Ballinderry river system, Co. Tyrone. In: Craysh Conservation in the
British Isles. (J Brickland, DM Holdich and EM Imhoff, eds.), pp. 87-94. Proceedings of a conference held
on 25th March 2009 in Leeds, UK.
Jay D and Holdich DM (1981). The distribution of the craysh, Austropotamobius pallipes, in British waters.
Freshwater Biology 11: 121-129.
King JA (2011). Inland Fisheries Ireland, Swords, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Personal communication.
Lucey J (1999). A chronological account of the craysh Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet) in Ireland.
Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society 23: 143-161.
Lucey J (2009). Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Water Laboratory, Kilkenny, Ireland. Personal
communication.
Lucey J (2010). Recent extension in range of the white-clawed craysh (Austropotamobius pallipes
(Lereboullet)) in Co. Cork. Irish Naturalists Journal 31(1): 62-63.
Lucey J (2011). Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Water Laboratory, Kilkenny, Ireland. Personal
communication.
Lucey J and McGarrigle M (1987). The distribution of the craysh Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet) in
Ireland. Irish Fisheries Investigations 29A: 3-13.
Lyons R and Kelly-Quinn M (2003). An investigation into the disappearance of Austropotamobius pallipes
(Lereboullet) populations in the headwaters of the Nore River, Ireland, and the correlation to water quality.
Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture 370-371: 139-150.
Matthews MA (1992). Reproduction, growth and aquaculture potential of the freshwater craysh
Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet). PhD Thesis, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Matthews MA (2011). Northern Region Fisheries Board, Inland Fisheries Ireland, Ballyshannon, Co. Donegal,
Ireland. Personal communication.
Matthews MA and Reynolds JD (1992). Ecological impact of craysh plague in Ireland. Hydrobiologia 234:
1-6.
Matthews MA and Reynolds JD (1995). A population study of the white-clawed craysh Austropotamobius
pallipes (Lereboullet) in an Irish reservoir. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, Biology and Environment
95B: 99-109.
Matthews MA, Reynolds JD and Keatinge MJ (1993). Macrophyte reduction and benthic community alteration
by the craysh, Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet). Freshwater Craysh 9: 289-299.
126
Irish craysh under increasing threat (Reynolds)
Craysh Conservation
South West
Craysh Conservation
South West
Rees M, Nightingale J, Holdich DM (eds.) (2011). Species Survival: Securing
white-clawed craysh in a changing environment. Proceedings of a conference
held on 16th and 17th November 2010 in Bristol, UK.
Moriarty C (1973). A study of Austropotamobius pallipes in Ireland. Freshwater Craysh 1: 57-67.
Moriarty C (2011). Personal communication.
National Parks and Wildlife Service (2008). The status of EU protected habitats and species in Ireland.
www.npws.ie
Nelson B (2011). National Parks and Wildlife Service, Dublin 2, Ireland. Personal communication.
O’Connor W, Hayes G, O’Keeffe C and Lynn D (2009). Monitoring of white-clawed craysh Austropotamobius
pallipes in Irish lakes. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 37. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the
Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin.
O’Keeffe C (1986). The ecology of two populations of the freshwater craysh Austropotamobius pallipes
(Lereboullet) in Ireland. PhD Thesis, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.
O’Neill K (2011). Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust. Personal communication.
Peay S (2003). Monitoring the white-clawed craysh Austropotamobius pallipes. Conserving Natura 2000
Rivers Monitoring Series No. 1. English Nature, Peterborough, England.
Peay S (2011). University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Personal communication.
Peay S, Holdich DM and Brickland J (2010). Risk assessments of non-indigenous craysh in Great Britain.
Freshwater Craysh, 17: 109-122.
Policar T, Smyth J, Flanigan M, Kozák P and Kouba A (2010). Optimum water temperature for intensive
production of Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet) juveniles. Freshwater Craysh 17: 37-41.
Puky M, Reynolds J and Grandjean F (2002). Education as a key to decapod conservation. Bulletin Français
de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture 367: 911-916.
Reynolds JD (1979). Ecology of Austropotamobius pallipes in Ireland. Freshwater Craysh 4: 216-220.
Reynolds JD (1982). Notes on the Irish distribution of the freshwater craysh. Bulletin of the Irish
Biogeographical Society 6: 18-24.
Reynolds JD (1988). Craysh extinctions and craysh plague in Ireland. Biological Conservation 45: 279-
285.
Reynolds JD (1997). The present status of freshwater craysh in Ireland. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et
de la Pisciculture 347: 693-700.
Reynolds JD (2009). The current status of white-clawed craysh in Ireland. In: Craysh Conservation in the
British Isles. (J Brickland, DM Holdich and EM Imhoff, eds.), pp 35-41. Proceedings of a Conference held
on 25th March 2009 in Leeds, UK.
Reynolds JD and Demers A (2006). Comparison of white-clawed craysh populations in Irish and French
streams, with comments on its future survival in Europe. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture
380-381: 1115-1120.
Species Survival: Securing white-clawed craysh in a changing environment
127
Craysh Conservation
South West
Craysh Conservation
South West
Rees M, Nightingale J, Holdich DM (eds.) (2011). Species Survival: Securing
white-clawed craysh in a changing environment. Proceedings of a conference
held on 16th and 17th November 2010 in Bristol, UK.
Reynolds JD and Matthews MA (1993). Experimental shing of craysh (Austropotamobius pallipes
Lereboullet) stocks in an Irish midlands lake. Freshwater Craysh 9: 147-153.
Reynolds JD and Matthews MA (1996). Conservation strategies for the Irish freshwater craysh. In: The
conservation of aquatic systems (JD Reynolds, ed.), pp. 151-155. Royal Irish Academy, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Reynolds JD and Matthews MA (1997). Successful reintroduction of craysh to an Irish lake. Craysh News
- IAA Newsletter 19(2): 4-5.
Reynolds JD and O’Keeffe C (2004). Dietary patterns in stream- and lake-dwelling populations of
Austropotamobius pallipes. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture 376-377: 715-730.
Reynolds J, Gouin N, Pain S, Grandjean F, Demers A and Souty-Grosset C (2002). Irish craysh populations:
ecological survey and preliminary genetic ndings. Freshwater Craysh 13: 584-594.
Reynolds JD, Lynn D, O’Keeffe C, Lucey J, Clabbey K, McGarrigle M and King J (2010a). Conservation
assessment and current status of protected white-clawed craysh, Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet),
in Ireland. Freshwater Craysh 17: 123-127.
Reynolds J, Lynn D and O’Keeffe C (2010b). Methodology for monitoring Irish lake populations of white-
clawed craysh Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet). Freshwater Craysh 17: 195-200.
Reynolds J, O’Connor W, O’Keeffe and Lynn D (2010c). A technical manual for monitoring white-clawed
craysh Austropotamobius pallipes in Irish lakes. Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 45. National Parks and Wildlife
Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin.
Reynolds S (1992). Contract researcher, Welcomme Trust. Personal communication.
Rutty J (1772). An essay towards a natural history of the county of Dublin, Volume 1. W. Sleater, Dublin,
Ireland.
Souty-Grosset C (2011). University of Poitiers, France. Personal communication.
Thompson W (1843). On the Crustacea of Ireland Astacus uviatilis. Annals and Magazine of Natural
History XI: 106-108.
Watson PS (1971). Studies on the distribution of the freshwater craysh, Astacus (Potamobius) pallipes
Lereboullet in County Fermanagh, Northern Ireland, and in particular within Lough Lea. MS Report, Fisheries
Lab., Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
Wilson N (2011). Queen’s University, Belfast. NI, UK. Personal communication.
Wilson N and Horton MP (2008). Assessing the riparian habitat requirements of the white-clawed craysh,
Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet, 1858) in Northern Ireland. Craysh News – IAA Newsletter 30 (4):
1, 9-11.
128
Irish craysh under increasing threat (Reynolds)
Article
Full-text available
In response to the global decline of the White-clawed crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes, key conservation strategies have been developed in the United Kingdom and Ireland, including the supplementation of existing populations and establishment of new populations, using captive-breeding methods and/or translocations. The South West Crayfish Partnership (SWCP), a group of UK-based conservation organizations, oversees population-enhancement programmes in south-west England. Since 2006 the SWCP has established 16 ark sites (safe refuges) and conducted one river supplementation. In total, 17 sites have been stocked with over 5000 translocated and captive-hatched A. pallipes, increasing the number of discrete in situ populations in the region by at least 75%. A similar programme in southern Wales, led by Natural Resources Wales, has restocked three river catchments and one English still-water site with a total of over 4700 captive-reared juvenile A. pallipes. Although many of these ark sites are newly established, preliminary monitoring results are encouraging; at least 75% of ark sites in south-west England are currently viable and the three Welsh sites that have been monitored so far suggest continued presence of White-clawed crayfish.
Article
Full-text available
The American signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus was introduced to Great Britain for aquaculture in the mid-1970s and has spread naturally and by human introduction, with corresponding losses of indigenous white-clawed crayfish, Austropotamobius pallipes, from crayfish plague and competition. At least five other crayfish species have been introduced illegally and are now established. Further releases of three species were banned (1992), keeping of crayfish was regulated (1996), and crayfish were banned as angling bait (2005). Despite legislation, introductions still occur and the introduced crayfish species continue to spread. Species risk assessments have recently been carried out for five non-indigenous crayfish species using a standardised methodology. This study describes the findings. Pathways and potential for spread differ between species, but all involve human action. Importation of live crayfish for food, a growing interest in the wild-harvest of signal and narrow-clawed crayfish, Astacus leptodactylus, translocations by the public (e.g., anglers), and the illegal trade in aquarium species were assessed as significant risks. All the non-indigenous crayfish have potential for harm, but the risks from two European species, the noble crayfish, Astacus astacus, and the narrow-clawed crayfish, A. leptodactylus, were considered minor, compared to those of signal crayfish, spiny-cheek crayfish, Orconectes limosus, virile crayfish, Orconectes virilis, (yet to be risk-assessed) and red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. Future trends in the colonisation of Great Britain are considered.
Article
Full-text available
Throughout the world, crayfish are found in a wide range of habitats. Lakes, rivers, swamps, cave pools, temporary ponds and estuaries can pro fide suitable abiotic and biotic conditions for crayfish (Holdich 2002b). The same spectrum of habitats is populated by crayfish species indigenous to Europe. However, during the last two centuries the species composition of freshwater crayfish and and their distribution in Europe have been subject to major changes - one of the reasons certainly is the alteration and degradation of natural habitats by humans. Indigenous European crayfish populations are declining and all European. crayfish species are highly threatened, especially in regions with long traditions of land-use. This chapter deals with the habitat preferences and threats to indigenous crayfish species in Europe. [Atlas of Crayfish in Europe Chapter 2:26-47]
Article
This paper presents an analysis of two sampling methods used to examine population size and age structure of freshwater crayfish in the River Nore catchment, Ireland. Results indicate high densities of crayfish in this river system (20-45 per m 2). The combination of the two sampling methods employed (traps and enclosures) provided data on all size classes, reduced sampling selectivity and allowed estimates to be made on population densities, including juveniles.
Article
In analysing the eco-ethological traits of animal populations from the viewpoint of conservation biology, an understanding of the foraging activity of endangered species provides useful clues on habitat requirements and resource utilisation. The present study examined the foraging excursions of 60 specimens of the threatened crayfish, Austropotamobius pallipes, in a stream of central Italy. Foraging activity was related to both the distance travelled and the area covered, as well as to the organic content of the substrates investigated. Results were discussed under the premises of Schoener's (1971) theory of feeding strategies. The white-clawed crayfish minimised the time spent feeding: foraging excursions did not exceed one hour and the range of food search increased with time. Energy and nutrient intake were however maximised: crayfish fed on the substrates having higher organic carbon and nitrogen contents. Inter-sexual food partitioning was shown, males and females mostly feeding on vegetable debris and mosses, respectively. We speculate that this is a mechanism to avoid competition between dominant males and subordinate females.