ArticlePDF Available

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Replacement

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Background Enteral feeding should be considered for patients with an intact and functional gastrointestinal tract. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is indicated in patients requiring medium to long term enteral feeding (>30 days) and with impaired swallowing. Previously placed PEG tube can dislodge or be inadvertently removed, blocked, or damaged. Gastrostomy tube replacement is not infrequently performed. Patients and methods In this video manuscript, the author demonstrates step-by-step PEG tube replacement in several clinical scenarios: standard gastrostomy feeding tube (with internal retention balloon or with internal collapsible bumper) removal and replacement; low-profile feeding tube replacement; and feeding tube replacement over a wire guide. Conclusions PEG tube replacement can be easily replaced at bed-side in most cases. Occasionally, in difficult cases gastrostomy feeding tube replacement needs endoscopic guidance and assistance.
Content may be subject to copyright.
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/vjgien
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
SUPPLEMENTATION TO THE ENCYCLOPEDIA
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy
Tube Replacement
$
Shou-jiang Tang
n
Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center,
2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
Received 19 December 2013; received in revised form 23 January 2014; accepted 24 January 2014
KEYWORDS
Percutaneous
endoscopic
gastrostomy;
Endoscopy;
Low-prole feeding
tube;
PEG replacement
tube;
Enteral feeding;
Video
Abstract
Background: Enteral feeding should be considered for patients with an intact and functional
gastrointestinal tract. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is indicated
in patients requiring medium to long term enteral feeding (430 days) and with impaired
swallowing. Previously placed PEG tube can dislodge or be inadvertently removed, blocked, or
damaged. Gastrostomy tube replacement is not infrequently performed.
Patients and methods: In this video manuscript, the author demonstrates step-by-step PEG
tube replacement in several clinical scenarios: standard gastrostomy feeding tube (with
internal retention balloon or with internal collapsible bumper) removal and replacement;
low-prole feeding tube replacement; and feeding tube replacement over a wire guide.
Conclusions: PEG tube replacement can be easily replaced at bed-side in most cases.
Occasionally, in difcult cases gastrostomy feeding tube replacement needs endoscopic guidance
and assistance.
&2014 The Author. Published by Elsevier GmbH. This is an open access article under the CC BY
license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Video related to this article
Video related to this article can be found online at http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vjgien.2014.01.002.
1. Background
These patients had percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
(PEG) feeding tube placement for enteral feeding [14].
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vjgien.2014.01.002
2212-0971/&2014 The Author. Published by Elsevier GmbH. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
The terms of this license also apply to the corresponding video.
n
Tel.: +1 601 984 4540; fax: +1 601 984 4548.
E-mail address: stang@umc.edu
Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy (]]]])],]]]]]]
Please cite this article as: Tang S-j. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Replacement. Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI
Endoscopy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vjgien.2014.01.002
Not infrequently, the existing gastrostomy feeding tube
becomes blocked, damaged, inadvertently removed.
Occasionally, the patient requests a low-prole gastro-
stomy feeding tube to be placed.
The patient and/or patient's family consented with PEG
replacement.
Before PEG tube removal or replacement, health care
providers need to discuss with the patient/patient family
about the need for continued enteral feeding and the
type of replacement feeding tubes (Figure 1).
Percutaneous PEG removal or replacement can be safely
performed after the PEG tract is matured, which usually
matures over several weeks (average 4 weeks) after
initial PEG procedure.
Infrequently, the PEG tube is advertently removed or
prematurely blocked within weeks after initial PEG tube
placement. The decision to replace the feeding tube
through the existing PEG tract is based on clinical
presentation, physical examination, laboratory results,
and consulting physicians. Replacement through the
existing tract can be attempted if there is no evidence
of leak or perforation. Replacement under endoscopy is
recommended in this setting.
Abdominal examination revealed no peritoneal signs.
Unlike in initial PEG placement, a dose of parental
antibiotics is not needed before the procedure for
prophylaxis.
The patient is placed on supine position for the
procedure.
After feeding tube replacement, enteral feeding can be
started immediately.
2. Materials
Diagnostic gastroscope (Olympus GIF-Q180, Olympus
America, Center Valley, PA).
Gastrostomy feeding tube (PEG-PULL-S, Cook Medical,
Winston-Salem, NC).
MIC-KEY
s
low-prole gastrostomy feeding tube (Kim-
berly-Clark, Rosewell, GA).
3. Endoscopic procedure
3.1. PEG replacement feeding tube placement
through the existing PEG tract
If the PEG tube is not replaced by another tube, the
PEG tract will shrink in several hours and close within
days. A new PEG tube should be replaced quickly.
Otherwise, a Foley catheter should be placed through
the PEG tract to keep it open.
Select the size of replacement feeding tube based on
the size of old PEG tube. If the old PEG tube is loose
and gastric juice leakage around the tube is an issue, a
slightly larger new tube can be tried.
The old PEG feeding tube has either an internal
retention balloon or an internal collapsible bumper.
The external bumper is loosened and the old PEG tube
should move easily to and fro within the PEG tract.
Open the new replacement tube package, check the
intactness of internal retention balloon by injecting
water using a prelled syringe as directed in the
package insert, and apply lubricant to the tip and
external tubing of the new PEG replacement tube.
Old PEG removal can be achieved with one of the
following options [1]:
Gentle manual traction of the external tubing
and removal of the PEG tube with its internal
bumper (collapsible version) through the
matured PEG stoma. For PEG tube with an
internal retention balloon, the balloon is fully
deated before tube removal. This is performed
without sedation or endoscopy, and is the most
frequently utilized technique.
Cutting the tubing close to the skin and pushing
the internal bumper into the stomach.
Spontaneous passage of the internal bumper
through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.
Small risk (23%) of bowel obstruction by the
migrating bumper.
Endoscopic removal of the internal bumper after
cutting the feeding tube close to the skin. This
technique involves endoscopy and sedation.
Insert the replacement tube gently through the exiting
PEG tract into the stomach and inate the internal
retention balloon with the prelled syringe.
Check the position of the replaced tube by aspiration
of gastric content (Figure 2).
If there are any concerns about the location of the
replaced tube, a water soluble radiologic contrast
should be obtained to conrm the placement before
feeding is resumed.
Infrequently, the old PEG can be changed over a
standard wire guide.
Not done as a routine, a contrast study through the
replaced PEG tube can be performed to conrm its
intraluminal position.
Figure 1 Image showing two standard replacement gastro-
stomy feeding tubes (A and B), a low-prole feeding tube (C),
and two types of extension sets (D and E) associated with the
low-prole button. D is for bolus feeding.
S.-j. Tang2
Please cite this article as: Tang S-j. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Replacement. Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI
Endoscopy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vjgien.2014.01.002
3.2. Low-prole button placement through the
existing PEG tract
Some young and physically active patients prefer
wearing a low-prole feeding tube (Figure 3). A low-
prole button can be placed after the initial PEG tract
is matured.
The selection of the low-prole feeding tube is based
on the size of the old PEG tube and by measuring the
PEG tract length using the old PEG tube before
removal.
Features of these low-prole gastrostomy feeding tubes
include:
Unobtrusive, easy to conceal, and ease of care
Some tubes have a proximal anti-reux valve and
tapered distal tip
MIC-KEY
s
package provides two sets of extension
tubes
3.3. Buried bumper syndrome
Endoscopic ndings: sunken internal bumper or absence
of the internal bumper in the gastric lumen, stulous
opening or ulceration at the PEG site.
For externally removable PEG tube, the PEG can be
removed by external traction. If the internal bumper is
non-collapsible, the PEG tube can be removed after
endoscopic dissection of the PEG tract using a coagula-
tion device (such as needle knife or snare).
Insert a wire guide through the existing PEG tube.
Secure the wire guide with an endoscopic snare.
Remove the old PEG tube over the wire guide using
external traction.
Insert a new PEG tube through the old tract over the
secured wire guide.
PEG replacement should be performed under endoscopic
guidance to avoid false track formation during unguided
tube insertion.
4. Key learning points and tips and tricks
Percutaneous PEG removal or replacement can be safely
performed after the PEG tract is matured, usually over
several weeks (average 4 weeks) after initial PEG
placement.
Before PEG tube removal or replacement, health care
providers need to discuss the need for continued enteral
feeding and the type of replacement tubes with the
patients and their family.
If the PEG tube is not replaced by another tube, the PEG
tract will shrink in several hours and close within days. A
new PEG tube should be replaced quickly. Otherwise, a
Foley catheter should be placed through the PEG tract to
keep it open Select the size of replacement feeding tube
based on the size of old PEG tube.
If the old PEG tube is loose and gastric juice leakage around
the tube is an issue, a slightly larger new tube can be tried.
If there are concerns about the location of the replaced
tube, a water soluble radiologic contrast study should be
obtained to conrm the placement before feeding is
resumed.
5. Complications and risk factors
(if applicable)
Hemorrhage (local stoma bleeding, hematoma, gastro-
intestinal bleeding).
PEG tube tract rupture.
Infections (peri-stomal cellulitis, abdominal wall abscess,
peritonitis, and necrotizing fasciitis).
Pressure necrosis, gastric ulcer.
Skin breakdown.
Hyper-granulation tissue.
6. Scripted voiceover
Voiceover text
No text.
No text.
Figure 2 Image showing the bile stained gastric content being
aspirated through the newly replaced gastrostomy feeding
tube, conrming the intragastric location of the feeding tube.
Figure 3 Image showing a low prole feeding button.
3Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy
Please cite this article as: Tang S-j. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Replacement. Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI
Endoscopy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vjgien.2014.01.002
Voiceover text
After percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, i.e. PEG
feeding tube placement, the PEG tube can become
blocked, damaged, or inadvertently removed.
If the PEG tube is not replaced by another tube, the PEG
tract will shrink in several hours and close within days. A
new PEG tube should be replaced quickly.
Otherwise, a Foley catheter should be placed through the
PEG tract to keep it open.
Size selection of the replacement feeding tube should be
based on the size of the old PEG tube.
If the old PEG tube is loose and gastric juice leakage around
the tube is an issue, a slightly larger new tube can be
tried.
The external bumper is loosened and the old PEG tube
should move easily to and fro within the PEG tract. This
old feeding tube has an internal retention balloon.
The balloon is being deated with an empty syringe. Efforts
should be made to completely deate the balloon before
tube withdrawal
Open the replacement tube package, check the intactness
of the internal retention balloon by injecting water
through a prelled syringe as directed in the package
insert.
and apply lubricant to the tip and tubing of the new
replacement tube.
The old feeding tube should be easily withdrawn by applying
gentle traction on the tubing.
Insert the new feeding tube gently through the existing PEG
tract into the stomach.
Inate the internal retention balloon with a prelled syringe
Apply gentle traction on the tube to ensure the internal
balloon is fully inated.
Then slide the external bolster over the tubing close to the
skin.
Check the intragastric location of the new feeding tube by
aspiration of gastric content.
In this patient, the old feeding tube is advertently removed
and a Foley catheter is place to keep the PEG tract open.
Before removing the catheter, the internal retention
balloon is being deated.
The Foley catheter is easily removed.
After applying lubricant to the tip of the feeding tube, the
replacement tube is gently advanced through the PEG
tract into the stomach.
The spontaneous return of bile stained gastric juice within
the tube indicates optimal intragastric location of the
feeding tube.
We are inating the internal rention balloon with a prelled
syringe.
To minimize the risk of skin breakdown and ischemic gastric
ulcer development, the external bolster should not be
placed too tight over the skin.
After initial PEG tube placement, instead of having an
internal retention balloon, the original PEG tube has a
collapsable internal bumper.
Voiceover text
In this case, the PEG tube can be removed by applying rm
traction on the tubing.
Infrequently, the old PEG tube can be exchanged over a
standard wire guide.
In difcult cases, endoscopy can be utilized to guide and
assist feeding tube exchange.
Some young and physically active patients prefer wearing a
low-prole feeding tube. A low-prole button can be
placed after the initial PEG tract is matured.
We are testing the intactness and patency of the internal
rention balloon.
With an empty syringe, the internal retention balloon of the
old feeding tube is deated.
The old low prole feeding tube is easily removed and the
new one is placed.
By injecting the prelled syringe through the balloon port,
the internal retention balloon is inated.
PEG tube removal or replacement can be safely performed
after the PEG tract is matured. If the PEG tube is not
replaced by another tube, the PEG tract will shrink in
several hours and close within days.
Size selection of the replacement feeding tube should be
based on the size of the old PEG tube. If there are
concerns about the location of the replaced tube, a water
soluble radiologic contrast should be obtained to conrm
the placement before feeding is resumed.
Conict of interest
Shou Tang has nothing to declare and we have no conict of
interests.
Funding source
No funding was available for this study and manuscript.
References
[1] Jain R, Maple JT, Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Ben-Menachem T,
et al. The role of endoscopy in enteral feeding. Gastrointest
Endosc 2011;74(1):712.
[2] Fukami N, Anderson MA, Khan K, Harrison ME, Appalaneni V,
et al. The role of endoscopy in gastroduodenal obstruction and
gastroparesis. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74(1):1321.
[3] Kwon RS, Banerjee S, Desilets D, Diehl DL, Farraye FA, et al.
Enteral nutrition access devices. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72
(2):23648.
[4] Tang SJ. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (pull method)
and jejunal extension tube placement. Video J Encycl GI Endosc
2014. (in press).
S.-j. Tang4
Please cite this article as: Tang S-j. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Replacement. Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI
Endoscopy (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vjgien.2014.01.002
... 19 The complications associated with BBS include perforation, peritonitis, 6,20,21 abdominal wall bleeding, 22,23 and abdominal wall abscess, 24 as well as necrosis secondary to pressure and gastric ulcers. 25 Although the majority of these manifestations can be diagnosed clinically based on the history, the physical examination, and the failure to insert and rotate the PEG tube before replacing the external stump, 26 the definitive diagnosis is made by endoscopy since it allows a more accurate localization. 27 However, abdominal ultrasound, 28 endosonography, 29 and abdominal computed tomography (CT) can also be used as diagnostic tools. ...
Article
Full-text available
Buried bumper syndrome (BBS) was described as a complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) that occurs when the internal stump of the probe migrates and is located between the gastric wall and the skin. The increase of compression between the internal stump and the external stump of the gastrostomy tube causes pain and the inability to feed. We present the cases of three patients with BBS managed by the metabolic and nutritional support department. These cases intend to illustrate one of the less frequent complications of PEG, clinical presentation, risk factors, diagnosis, and especially clinical management. Although there are no defined gold standards for its management, the most important points in the management of this condition are early recognition, recommendations to avoid ischemic process at the moment of the insertion of the tube, specific care of the gastrostomy tube, and a periodic nutrition evaluation to avoid overweight, which causes traction and excessive pressure in the gastric wall. It is important for physicians to be aware of the recommendations to prevent BBS and its complications, especially in patients in whom communication can be difficult secondary to their pathologies and comorbidities.
Article
Conclusion: Gastrostomy tube replacement using a new approach through the abdominal-wall stoma with a small-caliber trans-nasal endoscope is feasible, fast, and safe compared with the trans-oral approach. Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of a new technique using a trans-nasal endoscope for gastrostomy tube replacement. Methods: Between June 2005 and December 2013 in the Peking University Third Hospital, 69 patients underwent gastrostomy tube replacement using the trans-oral approach (conventional method) or a small-caliber trans-nasal endoscope inserted through the abdominal-wall stoma (new method). A retrospective review was performed of the medical records of those patients, including demography and information about the surgical procedure and any complications. Patients were classified into the conventional group and the new method group. Descriptive statistics for all continuous variables were mean ± standard deviation and for categorical variables were number and percentage. Results: Gastrostomy tube replacement was achieved in 69 of 69 cases (100%); 23 of these procedures were performed using the new method. The surgery time with the conventional method (8.3 ± 2.0 min) was significantly longer than with the new method (6.0 ± 0.9 min, p < 0.001). With the conventional method, there was one patient (2%) with post-operative fever and skin infection; no complications occurred with the new method.
Article
Full-text available
Background Enteral feeding should be considered for patients with an intact and functional gastrointestinal tract. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is indicated in patients requiring medium to long term enteral feeding (>30 days) and with impaired swallowing. Patients and methods In this video manuscript, we demonstrate the complete PEG procedure (pull method) in a 65 year old patient and placement of PEG jejunal extension tube in another patient who needed post-pyloric enteral feeding. Conclusions PEG-pull method is the most widely used PEG technique. Appropriate patient selection, timing of the procedure, informed consent, antibiotic prophylaxis, adequate endoscopic air insufflation during PEG site selection, and optimal PEG site localization are the keys in this procedure.
Article
This is one of a series of statements discussing the utilization of gastrointestinal endoscopy in common clinical situations. The Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy prepared this text. A previous guideline related to this topic (ASGE Publication No. 1017, Gastrointest Endosc 1998;48:699-701). Since that time, new information has become available that requires an update of this statement and its recommendations. In preparing this update, a MEDLINE literature search was performed, and additional references were obtained from the bibliographies of the identified articles and from the recommendations of expert consultants. When inadequate data existed from well-designed prospective trials, emphasis was given to results from large series and reports from recognized experts. Guidelines for appropriate utilization of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus. Controlled clinical studies are needed to clarify aspects of this statement, and revision may be necessary as new data appear. Clinical consideration may justify a course of action at variance from these recommendations.
Article
The ASGE Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidence-based methodology is used, performing a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic and a MAUDE (U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported complications of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the "related articles" feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but, in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such situations, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the committee as a whole, and approved by the ASGE Governing Board. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review, the MEDLINE database was searched through August 2009 for articles related to endoscopy in patients requiring enteral feeding access by using the keywords "endoscopy," "percutaneous," "gastrostomy," "jejunostomy," "nasogastric," "nasoenteric," "nasojejunal," "transnasal," "feeding tube," "enteric," and "button." Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.