No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
Lipoprotein(a) Levels in Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Abstract
To determine the relationship between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a large cohort of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients.
Lipoprotein(a) is considered a cardiovascular risk factor. Nevertheless, the role of Lp(a) as a predictor of CVD in FH has been a controversial issue.
Cross-sectional analysis of 1960 FH and 957 non-FH relatives recruited at SAFEHEART, a long-term observational cohort study of a molecularly well-defined FH population. Lipoprotein(a) concentrations were measured in plasma using an immunoturbidimetric method.
Patients with FH, especially those with CVD had higher Lp(a) plasma levels compared with their unaffected relatives (p<0.001). A significant difference in Lp(a) levels was observed when the most frequent null and defective mutations in LDLR mutations were analysed (p<0.0016). In multivariate analysis, Lp(a) was an independent predictor for cardiovascular disease. Patients carrying null-mutations and Lp(a) levels > 50 mg/dl showed the highest cardiovascular risk compared with patients carrying the same mutations and Lp(a) < 50 mg/dL.
Lipoprotein(a) is an independent predictor of CVD in men and women with FH. Cardiovascular risk is higher in those patients with lipoprotein(a) > 50 mg/dL carrying a receptor-negative mutation in LDLR gene compared with other less severe mutations.
... Different adult studies showed that Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in patients with FH compared with patients without FH or healthy control groups, and that a (clinical) FH diagnosis in at least a part of the FH patients was due to high Lp(a) levels. 13,14,[32][33][34][35] Yet in most adult studies, FH was diagnosed using diagnostic tools such as the DLCNC, and as a result, these groups include both FH patients with and without FH-causing mutations. In children, however, these diagnostic tools are not validated. ...
... Since no concrete, validated diagnostic tools for diagnosing FH exist in children, performing both is especially important to distinguish children with definite FH from those without an FH mutation but with high Lp(a). More importantly, patients with genetically confirmed FH who also have high Lp(a) levels form another, high-risk group due to a lifelong exposure to two genetic risk factors for CVD 13,32,51,52 and should be identified and monitored as early as possible, preferably during childhood. If high Lp(a) levels are found in children, further optimization of other CVD risk factors is needed, including more aggressive/intensive lipid-lowering treatment and lifelong adoption of a healthy lifestyle. ...
... In adult studies, it is assumed that 20% of the general population has increased Lp(a) levels of over 50 mg/dL, and that in referral populations, the number of subjects with increased Lp(a) is even higher. 18,32,59 However, in our study cohort, a lower prevalence of elevated Lp(a) was observed compared with adult studies. This might be explained Lipoprotein(a) levels in children with and without familial hypercholesterolemia either by differences in indications for referral or because Lp(a) levels may be lower in children than in adults. ...
Aims
Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) predisposes children to the early initiation of atherosclerosis and is preferably diagnosed by DNA analysis. Yet, in many children with a clinical presentation of FH, no mutation is found. Adult data show that high levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] may underlie a clinical presentation of FH, as the cholesterol content of Lp(a) is included in conventional LDL cholesterol measurements. As this is limited to adult data, Lp(a) levels in children with and without (clinical) FH were evaluated.
Methods and results
Children were eligible if they visited the paediatric lipid clinic (1989–2020) and if Lp(a) measurement and DNA analysis were performed. In total, 2721 children (mean age: 10.3 years) were included and divided into four groups: 1931 children with definite FH (mutation detected), 290 unaffected siblings/normolipidaemic controls (mutation excluded), 108 children with probable FH (clinical presentation, mutation not detected), and 392 children with probable non-FH (no clinical presentation, mutation not excluded). In children with probable FH, 32% were found to have high Lp(a) [geometric mean (95% confidence interval) of 15.9 (12.3–20.6) mg/dL] compared with 10 and 10% [geometric means (95% confidence interval) of 11.5 (10.9–12.1) mg/dL and 9.8 (8.4–11.3) mg/dL] in children with definite FH (P = 0.017) and unaffected siblings (P = 0.002), respectively.
Conclusion
Lp(a) was significantly higher and more frequently elevated in children with probable FH compared with children with definite FH and unaffected siblings, suggesting that high Lp(a) may underlie the clinical presentation of FH when no FH-causing mutation is found. Performing both DNA analysis and measuring Lp(a) in all children suspected of FH is recommended to assess possible LDL cholesterol overestimation related to increased Lp(a).
... Early initiation of cholesterollowering treatment can achieve a 10-fold decreased risk of ASCVD in patients with FH (Perez-Calahorra et al., 2019). However, despite lowering LDL-C to target levels, there is still a residual risk in some patients, a particular culprit being elevated plasma Lp(a) levels (Alonso et al., 2014;Vuorio et al., 2017;Rosenson and Goonewardena, 2021). ...
... Lp(a) concentration above 50 mg/dL (≈100-125 nmol/L), that is above the 80th percentile for a Caucasian population, is commonly accepted in clinical practice as an elevated level (Nordestgaard et al., 2010;Grundy et al., 20182019;Wilson et al., 2019;Pearson et al., 2021), and is used as a clinically meaningful threshold level in many studies. Hyper-Lp(a) is more prevalent in HeFH than in the general population (29.3% vs. 22.2%), as shown in a large study of 2,917 patients with HeFH by (Alonso et al., 2014). The prevalence of hyper-Lp(a) may be as high as 30%-50% of patients with HeFH (Vuorio et al., 2020). ...
... Also, Lp(a) concentrations were reported to be higher in patients with FH (LDLR and PCSK9 mutations) compared with controls (Tada et al., 2016), and Lp(a) levels are modestly lowered by PCSK9 inhibitors (Bittner et al., 2020;O'Donoghue et al., 2019). Lp(a) levels were numerically higher in FH patients with LDLR null mutations compared with those with defective mutations in the SAFEHEART study (Alonso et al., 2014). Although Lp(a) concentrations have been reported to be high in FH, it remains unclear whether this involves decreased Lp(a) clearance via the LDL receptor (Vuorio et al., 2020). ...
Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a predominantly genetic disorder, is a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and calcific aortic valvular disease, particularly in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a Tier I genomic condition. The combination from birth of the cumulative exposure to elevated plasma concentrations of both Lp(a) and low-density lipoprotein is particularly detrimental and explains the enhanced morbidity and mortality risk observed in patients with both conditions. An excellent opportunity to identify at-risk patients with hyper-Lp(a) at increased risk of ASCVD is to test for hyper-Lp(a) during cascade testing for FH. With probands having FH and hyper-Lp(a), the yield of detection of hyper-Lp(a) is 1 individual for every 2.1–2.4 relatives tested, whereas the yield of detection of both conditions is 1 individual for every 3–3.4 relatives tested. In this article, we discuss the incorporation of assessment of Lp(a) in the cascade testing in FH as a feasible and crucial part of models of care for FH. We also propose a simple management tool to help physicians identify and manage elevated Lp(a) in FH, with implications for the care of Lp(a) beyond FH, noting that the clinical use of RNA therapeutics for specifically targeting the overproduction of Lp(a) in at risk patients is still under investigation.
... В исследовании R. Alonso и соавт. с участием 1960 пациентов с СГХС и их 957 родственников без СГХС было показано, что гетерозиготная СГХС сочеталась с гиперлипопротеинемией (а) (более 50 мг/дл) значимо чаще, чем в целом в популяции (29,3% против 22,2%, p <0,0001) [12]. H. G. Kraft и соавт. ...
Currently, worldwide interest in lipoprotein(a) (LP(a) as one of the most important markers of premature and aggressive atherosclerosis is steadily growing. This trend is due to both the new data on the pathogenesis of hyperlipoproteinemia (a) and the development of novel treatment methods in the near future. The variety of clinical manifestations of atherosclerosis associated with high LP(a) concentrations leads such patients to specialists of various profiles. The aim of this paper was to demonstrate, using examples from the practice of two lipid centers in Krasnodar, the diversity of clinical scenarios of atherosclerosis as a systemic disease in patients with very high LP(a) levels, as well as to highlight the current and future options for the treatment of hyperlipoproteinemia (a).
... A low LPA genetic score in an individual with HC suggests that Lp(a) cholesterol did not contribute substantially to overall cholesterol concentrations. To investigate this further, and to adjust for the cholesterol fraction of the Lp(a) particle, 34 we subtracted one third of the Lp(a) concentrations (a conservative estimate) from total LDL-C in the groups of HC patients that are variant-negative with an unclear disease origin, all FH variant-positives, and FH variant-negatives with a high LPA genetic score. The difference between total Lp(a)-adjusted LDL-C and total LDL-C was only significant ( p = 0.002) in FH variantnegative individuals with high LPA genetic scores (see Figure 4). ...
Routine genetic testing in hypercholesterolemia patients reveals a causative monogenic variant in less than 50% of affected individuals. Incomplete genetic characterization is partly due to polygenic factors influencing low‐density‐lipoprotein‐cholesterol (LDL‐C). Additionally, functional variants in the LPA gene affect lipoprotein(a)‐associated cholesterol concentrations but are difficult to determine due to the complex structure of the LPA gene. In this study we examined whether complementing standard sequencing with the analysis of genetic scores associated with LDL‐C and Lp(a) concentrations improves the diagnostic output in hypercholesterolemia patients. 1.020 individuals including 252 clinically diagnosed hypercholesterolemia patients from the FH Register Austria were analyzed by massive‐parallel‐sequencing of candidate genes combined with array genotyping, identifying nine novel variants in LDLR. For each individual, validated genetic scores associated with elevated LDL‐C and Lp(a) were calculated based on imputed genotypes. Integrating these scores especially the score for Lp(a) increased the proportion of individuals with a clearly defined disease etiology to 68.8% compared to 46.6% in standard genetic testing. The study highlights the major role of Lp(a) in disease etiology in clinically diagnosed hypercholesterolemia patients, of which parts are misclassified. Screening for monogenic causes of hypercholesterolemia and genetic scores for LDL‐C and Lp(a) permits more precise diagnosis, allowing individualized treatment.
... Strikingly, it is recommended that a flag should be included when Lp (a) values exceed 120 mg/dL. This cutoff value may seem very elevated, as values>50 mg/dL increase vascular risk substantially in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia [9]. In addition, in the trial with Pelacarsen (Horizon), two cutoff points were established for allocation to one of the two arms: >70 mg/dL and >90 mg/dL. ...
... Hofmann et al. [63] found that Lp(a) clearance was significantly increased in LDLR overexpressing mice. Results of a cross-sectional analysis of 1960 FH patients, compared to control subjects, showed significantly higher Lp(a) concentrations in patients with null LDLR alleles [64]. The exact mechanism of Lp(a) reduction by PCSK9 inhibitors is still unclear and merits further study. ...
Introduction:
Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common hereditary genetic disorder, characterized by elevated circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] concentrations, leading to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Two types of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors- alirocumab and evolocumab- are efficient drugs in the treatment of FH, which can effectively reduce Lp(a) levels.
Material and methods:
Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed up to November 2022 were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of alirocumab/evolocumab and placebo treatment on plasma Lp(a) levels in FH. Statistics were analysed by Review Manager (RevMan 5.3) and Stata 15.1.
Results:
Eleven RCTs involved a total of 2408 participants. Alirocumab/evolocumab showed a significant efficacy in reducing Lp(a) [weighted mean difference (WMD): -20.10%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -25.59% to -14.61%] compared with placebo. In the drug type subgroup analyses, although the efficacy of evolocumab was slightly low (WMD: -19.98%, 95% CI: -25.23% to -14.73%), there was no difference with alirocumab (WMD: -20.54%, 95% CI: -30.07% to -11.02%). In the treatment duration subgroup analyses, the efficacy of the 12-week duration group (WMD: -17.61%, 95% CI: -23.84% to -11.38%) was lower than in the group of ≥ 24 weeks' duration (WMD: -22.81%, 95% CI: -31.56% to -14.07%). In the participants' characteristics subgroup analyses, the results showed that no differential effect of alirocumab/evolocumab therapy on plasma Lp(a) concentrations was observed (heterozygous FH [HeFH] WMD: -20.07%, 95% CI: -26.07% to -14.08%; homozygous FH [HoFH] WMD: -20.04%, 95% CI: -36.31% to -3.77%). Evaluation of all-cause adverse events (AEs) between alirocumab/evolocumab groups and placebo groups [relative risk (RR): 1.05, 95% CI: 0.98-1.12] implied no obvious difference between the 2 groups.
Conclusions:
Anti-PCSK9 drugs (alirocumab and evolocumab) may be effective as therapy for reducing serum Lp(a) levels in FH, and no differences were observed in treatment durations, participant characteristics, and other aspects of the 2 types of PCSk9 inhibitors. However, further experimental studies and RCTs are warranted to clarify the mechanism of PSCK9 inhibitors to lowering Lp(a) concentrations in FH.
... Llama la atención, sin embargo, que la Lp(a) se incluya como alerta cuando los niveles de la misma excedan los 120 mg/dL. Esta cifra podría parecer muy elevada habida cuenta que niveles >50 mg/dL incrementan el riesgo vascular de forma notable en sujetos con hipercolesterolemia familiar [9], y que en el ensayo con Pelacarsen (Horizon) los puntos de corte para ser incluido son dos brazos, uno>70 mg/dL y otro>90 mg/dL. Sin embargo, estos niveles están en consonancia con las recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Arteriosclerosis, para remitir a una Unidad de Lípidos aquellos pacientes con niveles de Lp(a) superiores a 117 mg/dL [10], derivadas del estudio poblacional de Copenhagen [11]. ...
... Lp(a) levels were detected only in a few previous studies. Mehta et al. found a median Lp(a) level of 30.5 mg/dl (305 mg/L) (Mehta et al., 2021) and other previous European studies reported similar values including the study of Lingenhel et al. (27.7 mg/dl; 277 mg/L) (Lingenhel et al., 1998), Alonso et al. (23.6 mg/dl; 236 mg/L) (Alonso et al., 2014). Our results are in line with these results. ...
Background and aims: Premature mortality due to atherosclerotic vascular disease is very high in Hungary in comparison with international prevalence rates, though the estimated prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is in line with the data of other European countries. Previous studies have shown that high lipoprotein(a)- Lp(a) levels are associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic vascular diseases in patients with FH. We aimed to assess the associations of serum Lp(a) levels and such vascular diseases in FH using data mining methods and machine learning techniques in the Northern Great Plain region of Hungary.
Methods: Medical records of 590,500 patients were included in our study. Based on the data from previously diagnosed FH patients using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network scores (≥7 was evaluated as probable or definite FH), we trained machine learning models to identify FH patients.
Results: We identified 459 patients with FH and 221 of them had data available on Lp(a). Patients with FH had significantly higher Lp(a) levels compared to non-FH subjects [236 (92.5; 698.5) vs. 167 (80.2; 431.5) mg/L, p < .01]. Also 35.3% of FH patients had Lp(a) levels >500 mg/L. Atherosclerotic complications were significantly more frequent in FH patients compared to patients without FH (46.6 vs. 13.9%). However, contrary to several other previous studies, we could not find significant associations between serum Lp(a) levels and atherosclerotic vascular diseases in the studied Hungarian FH patient group.
Conclusion: The extremely high burden of vascular disease is mainly explained by the unhealthy lifestyle of our patients (i.e., high prevalence of smoking, unhealthy diet and physical inactivity resulting in obesity and hypertension). The lack of associations between serum Lp(a) levels and atherosclerotic vascular diseases in Hungarian FH patients may be due to the high prevalence of these risk factors, that mask the deleterious effect of Lp(a).
... 17 measuring Lp(a) in every patient with FH owing to it potent prognostic information for ASCVD. 18,19 Identification of R-FH patients has clinical and social implications. The heterogeneity of the ASCVD risk in FH depends on genetic and environmental factors. ...
Aims
Knowledge of the features of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) who are protected from atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is important for the clinical and prognostic care of this apparently high-risk condition. Our aim was to investigate the determinant and characteristics of patients with FH who are protected from ASCVD and have normal life expectancy, so-called ‘resilient’ FH (R-FH).
Methods and results
Spanish Familial Hypercholesterolaemia cohort study (SAFEHEART) is an open, multicentre, nation-wide, long-term prospective cohort study in genetically defined patients with heterozygous FH in Spain. Patients in the registry who at the time of analysis were at least 65 years or those who would have reached that age had they not died from an ASCVD event were analysed as a case–control study. Resilient FH was defined as the presence of a pathogenic mutation causative of FH in a patient aged ≥65 years without clinical ASCVD. Nine hundred and thirty registrants with FH met the study criteria. A defective low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-receptor mutation, higher plasma level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), younger age, female gender, absence of hypertension, and lower plasma lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] concentration were independently predictive of R-FH. In a second model, higher levels of HDL-C and lower 10-year score in SAFEHEART-RE were also independently predictive of R-FH.
Conclusion
Resilient FH may be typified as being female and having a defective LDL-receptor mutation, higher levels of plasma HDL-C, lower levels of Lp(a), and an absence of hypertension. The implications of this type of FH for clinical practice guidelines and the value for service design and optional care of FH remains to be established.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02693548.
Familial hypercholesterolemia is a common genetic disorder of autosomal inheritance associated with elevated LDL-cholesterol. It is estimated to affect 1:250 individuals in general population roughly estimated to be 5 million in India. The prevalence of FH is higher in young CAD patients (<55 years in men; <60 years in women). FH is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Screening during childhood and Cascade screening of family members of known FH patients is of utmost importance in order to prevent the burden of CAD. Early identification of FH patients and early initiation of the lifelong lipid lowering therapy is the most effective strategy for managing FH. FH management includes pharmaceutical agents (statins and non statin drugs) and lifestyle modification. Inspite of maximum dose of statin with or without Ezetimibe, if target levels of LDL-C are not achieved, Bempedoic acid, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) Inhibitors/Inclisiran can be added.
Background and aims
Epidemiology of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease might be different in patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia plus high levels (≥30 mg/dl) of Lp(a) (H-Lpa) than in those with polygenic hypercholesterolemia alone (H-LDL). We compared the incidence of peripheral artery disease (PAD), coronary artery disease (CAD), and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) in patients with H-Lpa and in those with H-LDL.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of demographics, risk factors, vascular events, therapy, and lipid profile in outpatient clinical data. Inclusion criteria was adult age, diagnosis of polygenic hypercholesterolemia, and both indication and availability for Lp(a) measurement.
Results
Medical records of 258 patients with H-Lpa and 290 H-LDL were reviewed for occurrence of vascular events. The median duration of follow-up was 10 years (IQR 3–16). In spite of a similar reduction of LDL cholesterol, vascular events occurred more frequently, and approximately 7 years earlier (P = 0.024) in patients with H-Lpa than in H-LDL (HR 1.96 1.21–3.17, P = 0.006). The difference was around 10 years for acute events (TIA, Stroke, acute coronary events) and one year for chronic ones (P = 0.023 and 0.525, respectively). Occurrence of acute CAD was higher in H-Lpa men (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2–7.9, P = 0.007) while, among women, PAD was observed exclusively in H-Lpa subjects with smoking habits (P = 0.009).
Conclusions
Patients with high Lp(a) levels suffer from a larger and earlier burden of the disease compared to those with polygenic hypercholesterolemia alone. These patients are at higher risk of CAD if they are men, and of PAD if they are women.
Introduction and objectives:
Tendon xanthomas (TX) are lipid deposits highly specific to familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). However, there is significant variability in their presentation among FH patients, primarily due to largely unknown causes. Lipoprotein(a) is a well-established independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the general population as well as in FH. Given the wide variability of lipoprotein(a) among FH individuals and the likelihood that TX may result from a proatherogenic and proinflammatory condition, the objective of this study was to analyze the size of TX in the Achilles tendons of FH participants and the variables associated with their presence, including lipoprotein(a) concentration.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted on 377 participants with a molecular diagnosis of heterozygous FH. Achilles tendon maximum thickness (ATMT) was measured using ultrasonography with standardized equipment and procedures. Demographic variables and lipid profiles were collected. A multivariate linear regression model using a log-Gaussian approach was used to predict TX size. Classical cardiovascular risk factors and lipoprotein(a) were included as explanatory variables.
Results:
The mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was 277mg/dL without lipid-lowering treatment, and the median ATMT was 5.50mm. We demonstrated that age, sex, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a) were independently associated with ATMT. However, these 4 variables did not account for most the interindividual variability observed (R2=0.205).
Conclusions:
TX, a characteristic hallmark of FH, exhibit heterogeneity in their presentation. Interindividual variability can partially be explained by age, male sex, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a) but these factors account for only 20% of this heterogeneity.
Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia is a life-threatening genetic condition, which causes extremely elevated LDL-C levels and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease very early in life. It is vital to start effective lipid-lowering treatment from diagnosis onwards. Even with dietary and current multimodal pharmaceutical lipid-lowering therapies, LDL-C treatment goals cannot be achieved in many children. Lipoprotein apheresis is an extracorporeal lipid-lowering treatment, which is well established since three decades, lowering serum LDL-C levels by more than 70% per session. Data on the use of lipoprotein apheresis in children with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia mainly consists of case-reports and case-series, precluding strong evidence-based guidelines. We present a consensus statement on lipoprotein apheresis in children based on the current available evidence and opinions from experts in lipoprotein apheresis from over the world. It comprises practical statements regarding the indication, methods, treatment targets and follow-up of lipoprotein apheresis in children with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia and on the role of lipoprotein(a) and liver transplantation.
Background
Low density lipoprotein (LDL) and Lipoprotein (Lp)(a) are proatherogenic apolipoprotein (apo) B-containing members of the non–high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) family of particles. Elevated plasma levels of LDL cholesterol (C), non-HDL-C, and apo B are defining features of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), but reports of elevated plasma Lp(a) concentration are inconsistent.
Methods
We performed retrospective chart reviews of 256 genetically characterized patients with hypercholesterolemia and 272 control subjects from the Lipid Genetics Clinic at University Hospital in London, Ontario. We evaluated pairwise correlations between plasma levels of Lp(a) and those of LDL-C, non-HDL-C and apo B.
Results
Mean Lp(a) levels were not different between individuals with hypercholesterolemia and control subjects. No correlations were found between Lp(a) and LDL-C or non–HDL-C levels in controls or patients with hypercholesterolemia; all r values < 0.079 and all P values > 0.193. Borderline weak correlations between Lp(a) and apo B were identified in patients r = 0.103; P = 0.112) and controls (r = 0.175; P = 0.005). Results were similar across genotypic subgroups.
Conclusions
Lp(a) levels are independent of LDL-C and non–HDL-C; in particular Lp(a) levels are not increased in patients with hypercholesterolemia and molecularly proven HeFH. Apo B was only weakly associated with Lp(a). Elevated Lp(a) does not cause FH in our clinic patients. Genetic variants causing HeFH that raise LDL-C do not affect Lp(a), confirming that these lipoproteins are metabolically distinct. Lp(a) cannot be predicted from LDL-C and must be determined separately to evaluate its amplifying effect on atherosclerotic risk in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder that causes increased low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and a higher risk of premature atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Common causes of FH include inherited genetic mutations in the LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9 genes. LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9 mutations account for 79%, 5%, and <1% of cases of FH respectively. Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) is the necessary atherogenic lipoprotein which can serve as a determinant of cardiovascular disease including hypercholesterolemia. A founder variant in Apolipoprotein B (APOB p.R3527Q) causes FH and is found in 12% of the Pennsylvania Amish population. This article provides an overview of ApoB metabolism and clinical manifestations associated with APOB mutations. An understanding of the clinical manifestations caused by APOB p.R3527Q can be beneficial for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of FH in the Amish. Based on previous studies, changes in LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), LDL particles (LDL-P), small dense LDL particles, and ApoB levels can be seen among these patients putting them at an increased risk for atherosclerotic issues, vascular hardening, and changes in endothelial function, particularly among homozygous individuals.
“New developments in artificial intelligence may become a very useful future tool for risk stratification, but nowadays a good score combined with modulators, as those shown by Professor Daniel A. Siniawski’s team in his article, are the scientific basis for the management of our patients.”
Background
In addition to proatherogenic properties, lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) has also pro-inflammatory, antifibrinolytic and prothrombogenic features. The aim of the current study was to identify the predictors of functional and morphological properties of the arterial wall in patients after myocardial infarction and increased Lp(a) levels at the beginning and after treatment with proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors.
Methods
Seventy-six post-myocardial infarction patients with high Lp(a) levels were included in the study. Ultrasound measurements of flow-mediated dilation of brachial artery (FMD), carotid intima-media thickness (c-IMT) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were performed initially and after 6 months of treatment. At the same time points lipids, Lp(a), inflammatory and hemostasis markers were measured in blood samples.
Results
In linear regression model FMD significantly correlated with age at first myocardial infarction (β = 0.689; p = 0.022), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (β = -1.200; p = 0.009), vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (VCAM-1) (β = -0.992; p = 0.006), overall coagulation potential (β = 1.428; p = 0.014) and overall hemostasis potential (β = -1.473; p = 0.008). c-IMT significantly correlated with age at first myocardial infarction (β = 0.574; p = 0.033) and Lp(a) (β = 0.524; p = 0.040). PWV significantly correlated with systolic blood pressure (β = 0.332; p = 0.002), tumor necrosis factor alpha (β = 0.406; p = 0.002), interleukin-8 (β = -0.315; p = 0.015) and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (β = 0.229; p = 0.031). After treatment FMD reached statistical significance only in univariant analysis with systolic blood pressure (r = -0.286; p = 0.004) and VCAM-1 (r = -0.229; p = 0.024). PWV and c-IMT correlated with age (r = 0.334; p = 0.001 and r = 0.486; p < 0.0001, respectively) and systolic blood pressure (r = 0.556; p < 0.0001 and r = 0.233; p = 0.021, respectively).
Conclusions
Our results suggest that age, systolic blood pressure, Lp(a) levels and other biochemical markers associated with Lp(a) are predictors of functional and morphological properties of the arterial vessel wall in post-myocardial patients with high Lp(a) levels initially. However, after 6 months of treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors only age and systolic blood pressure seem to be predictors of these properties.
Trial registration
The protocol for this study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov on November, 3 2020 under registration number NCT04613167.
Graphical Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a molecule bound to apolipoprotein(a) with some similarity to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), which has been found to be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lp(a) appears to induce inflammation, atherogenesis, and thrombosis. Approximately 20% of the world's population has increased Lp(a) levels, determined predominantly by genetics. Current clinical practices for the management of dyslipidemia are ineffective in lowering Lp(a) levels. Evolving RNA-based therapeutics, such as the antisense oligonucleotide pelacarsen and small interfering RNA olpasiran, have shown promising results in reducing Lp(a) levels. Phase III pivotal cardiovascular outcome trials [Lp(a)HORIZON and OCEAN(a)] are ongoing to evaluate their efficacy in secondary prevention of major cardiovascular events in patients with elevated Lp(a). The future of cardiovascular residual risk reduction may transition to a personalized approach where further lowering of either LDL-C, triglycerides, or Lp(a) is selected after high-intensity statin therapy based on the individual risk profile and preferences of each patient.
Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Volume 64 is January 2024. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
Background: The clinical phenotype of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) combined with the classical genetic defects of this disease increase the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) in the case of a high level of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)). Aim: To assess the association of hereditary disorders of lipid metabolism with a high level of Lp(a) in the case of an early manifestation of CAD in the absence of the FH phenotype. Methods: We studied 81 patients with premature CAD (at the age up to 55 years in men and up to 60 years in women). Lp(a) was measured in the blood serum by the immunoturbidimetric method. We performed the molecular genetic testing, using massively parallel sequencing, which included the following panel of genes: ABCA1, ABCG1, ABCG5, ABCG8, ANGPTL3, APOA1, APOA2, APOA4, APOA5, APOB, APOC1, APOC2, APOC3, APOE, APOH, CETP, CH25H, CIDEC, CREB3L3, GPD1, GPIHBP1, LCAT, LDLR, LDLRAP1, LIPA, LIPC, LIPE, LIPG, LMF1, LPA, LPL, MTTP, MYLIP, NPC1, NPC1L1, NPC2, PCSK9, PLTP, PPP1R17, SAR1B, SCARB1, STAP1. Results: 24 (29.6%) patients had Lp(a) 30 mg/dl and were more likely to have a family history of CAD (70.8% vs 42.1%, p=0.05). In patients with a confirmed FH phenotype, there were no pathogenic variants associated with hereditary disorders of lipid metabolism. 4 patients with Lp(a) 30 mg/dl without a confirmed FH phenotype appeared to be carriers of pathogenic variants in the genes of lipid metabolism (LDLR p.Glu763Asp, ABCA1 p.Arg1128His, APOA5 p.His321Le), as well as of a not previously registered variant in the LIPE gene NM_005357.4:c. 2312TC. Conclusions: Lp(a) can be an appropriate marker for revealing pathogenic variants in the genes of the lipid metabolism system in patients without the clinical FH phenotype with an early CAD manifestation.
This contemporary, international, evidence-informed guidance aims to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) across different countries. FH, a family of monogenic defects in the hepatic LDL clearance pathway, is a preventable cause of premature coronary artery disease and death. Worldwide, 35 million people have FH, but most remain undiagnosed or undertreated. Current FH care is guided by a useful and diverse group of evidence-based guidelines, with some primarily directed at cholesterol management and some that are country-specific. However, none of these guidelines provides a comprehensive overview of FH care that includes both the lifelong components of clinical practice and strategies for implementation. Therefore, a group of international experts systematically developed this guidance to compile clinical strategies from existing evidence-based guidelines for the detection (screening, diagnosis, genetic testing and counselling) and management (risk stratification, treatment of adults or children with heterozygous or homozygous FH, therapy during pregnancy and use of apheresis) of patients with FH, update evidence-informed clinical recommendations, and develop and integrate consensus-based implementation strategies at the patient, provider and health-care system levels, with the aim of maximizing the potential benefit for at-risk patients and their families worldwide.
The present study was to explore the association between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and colorectal cancer (CRC) among inpatients. This study included 2822 participants (393 cases vs. 2429 controls) between April 2015 and June 2022. Logistic regression models, smooth curve fitting, and sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the relationship between Lp(a) and CRC. Compared with the lower Lp(a) quantile 1 (<79.6 mg/L), the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) in quantile 2 (79.6-145.0 mg/L), quantile 3 (146.0-299.0 mg/L), and quantile 4 (≥300.0 mg/L) were 1.41 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95–2.09), 1.54 (95% CI: 1.04–2.27), 1.84 (95% CI: 1.25–2.7), respectively. A linear relationship between lipoprotein(a) and CRC was observed. The finding that Lp(a) has a positive association with CRC supports the “common soil” hypothesis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CRC.
Abstract: Familial hypercholesterolemia is a common genetic disorder with a propensity towards early onset of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). The main goal of therapy is to reduce the LDL cholesterol and the current treatment generally consists of statin, ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors. Unfortunately, lowering LDL cholesterol may be difficult for many reasons such as the variation of response to statin therapy among the population or the high cost of some therapies (i.e., PCSK9 inhibitors). In addition to conventional therapy, additional strategies may be used. The gut microbiota has been recently considered to play a part in chronic systemic inflammation and hence in CVD. Several studies, though they are still preliminary, consider dysbiosis a risk factor for various CVDs through several mechanisms. In this review, we provide an update of the current literature about the intricate relation between the gut microbiota and the familial hypercholesterolemia.
Introduction:
There is abundant evidence that elevated lipoprotein(a) [LP(a)] associates with cardiovascular risk. Most lipid modifying therapies don't reduce Lp(a), but new technologies are emerging that act upstream, such as antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that inhibit the translation of mRNA for proteins specifically involved in lipid metabolism.
Areas covered:
Despite the benefit of therapies for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), Lp(a) is one of the "residual risks", established by observational and Mendelian randomization studies. Although current established lipid modifying therapies targeting low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, such as statins and ezetimibe, do not lower Lp(a), ASOs and siRNAs demonstrated significant reduction of Lp(a) by -98 to -101% in recent clinical trials. However, we still don't know if specifically lowering Lp(a) reduced cardiovascular events, how much Lp(a) lowering is required to produce clinical benefit, and whether diabetes and inflammation have any impact. This review summarizes Lp(a), the knowns and unknowns about Lp(a), and focus emerging treatments.
Expert opinion:
New Lp(a) lowering therapies have the potential to contribute to the personalized prevention of ASCVD.
Purpose of review:
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a monogenic disorder of elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from birth leading to increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, not all carriers of FH variants display an FH phenotype. Despite this fact, FH variants confer increased risk for atherosclerotic disease in population cohorts. An important question to consider is whether measurements of LDL-C can fully account for this risk.
Recent findings:
The atherosclerotic risk associated with FH variants is independent of observed adult LDL-C levels. Modeling adult longitudinal LDL-C accounts for more of this risk compared to using a single measurement. Still, even when adjusting for observed longitudinal LDL-C in adult cohorts, FH variant carriers are at increased risk for coronary artery disease. Genetic analyses, observational studies, and clinical trials all suggest that cumulative LDL-C is a critical driver of cardiovascular risk that may not be fully appreciated by routine LDL-C measurements in adulthood. As such, FH variants confer risk independent of adult LDL-C because these variants increase cumulative LDL-C exposure starting from birth.
Summary:
Both research and clinical practice focus on LDL-C measurements in adults, but measurements during adulthood do not reflect lifelong cumulative exposure to LDL-C. Genetic assessments may compliment clinical assessments by better identifying patients who have experienced greater longitudinal LDL-C exposure.
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common, inherited disease characterized by high levels of low-density lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) from birth. Any diseases associated with increased LDL-C levels including atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs) would be expected to be overrepresented among FH patients. There are several clinical scoring systems aiming to diagnose FH, however; most individuals who meet the clinical criteria for a FH diagnosis do not have a mutation causing FH. In this review, we aim to summarize the literature on the risk for the various forms of ASCVD in subjects with a proven FH-mutation (FH+). We searched for studies on FH+ and cardiovascular diseases and also included our and other groups published papers on FH + on a wide range of cardiovascular and other diseases of the heart and vessels. FH + patients are at a markedly increased risk of a broad range of ASCVD. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the most common in absolute numbers, but also aortic valve stenosis is by far associated with the highest excess risk. Per thousand patients, we observed 3.6 incident AMI per year compared to 1.9 incident aortic valve stenosis, however, standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for incident AMI was 2.3 compared to 7.9 for incident aortic valve stenosis. Further, occurrence of ischemic stroke seems not to be associated with increased risk in FH+. Clinicians should be aware of the excess risk of almost all kind of ASCVD in FH+, and the neutral risk of stroke need to be studied further in FH + patients.
Objective
The synergistic effect of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and C-reactive protein (CRP) on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the relations between Lp(a) and CRP levels and MACE in patients with FH whose Lp(a) levels are elevated.
Methods
We retrospectively investigated associations between genotypes and phenotypes, including low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level and the occurrence of MACE among patients with FH (N = 786, male/female: 374/412). A Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify factors associated with MACE, adjusting for traditional risk factors. Patients with FH were divided into four groups, based on their Lp(a) and CRP levels, and assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves.
Results
The median follow-up was 12.6 years (interquartile range [IQR], 9.5–17.9 years). During follow-up, 129 MACE were observed. Median Lp(a) and CRP levels were 21.4 (10.9–38.3) mg/dL and 0.20 (0.11–0.29) mg/dL, respectively. Under these conditions, natural log-transformed Lp(a) and CRP were not associated with MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91–1.25; P = 0.220; and HR, 1.12; CI, 0.96–1.28; P = 0.190, respectively). However, in Group 4, Lp(a) and CRP were significantly associated with MACE (HR, 2.44; CI, 1.42–3.46; P = 1.8 × 10⁻⁷).
Conclusions
In patients with FH, Lp(a) was significantly associated with MACE only when the CRP level was elevated. Patients with FH whose Lp(a) and CRP levels are elevated should be treated aggressively.
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most frequent genetic disorder resulting in increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels from childhood, leading to premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) if left untreated. FH diagnosis is based on clinical criteria and/or genetic testing and its prevalence is estimated as being up to 1:300,000–400,000 for the homozygous and ~1:200–300 for the heterozygous form. Apart from its late diagnosis, FH is also undertreated, despite the available lipid-lowering therapies. In addition, elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) (>50 mg/dL; 120 nmol/L), mostly genetically determined, has been identified as an important cardiovascular risk factor with prevalence rate of ~20% in the general population. Novel Lp(a)-lowering therapies have been recently developed and their cardiovascular efficacy is currently investigated. Although a considerable proportion of FH patients is also diagnosed with high Lp(a) levels, there is a debate whether these two entities are associated. Nevertheless, Lp(a), particularly among patients with FH, has been established as a significant cardiovascular risk factor. In this narrative review, we present up-to-date evidence on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of both FH and elevated Lp(a) with a special focus on their association and joint effect on ASCVD risk.
For almost a century, familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) has been considered a serious disease, causing atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, and ischemic stroke. Closely related to this is the widespread acceptance that its cause is greatly increased low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, numerous observations and experiments in this field are in conflict with Bradford Hill’s criteria for causality. For instance, those with FH demonstrate no association between LDL-C and the degree of atherosclerosis; coronary artery calcium (CAC) shows no or an inverse association with LDL-C, and on average, the life span of those with FH is about the same as the surrounding population. Furthermore, no controlled, randomized cholesterol-lowering trial restricted to those with FH has demonstrated a positive outcome. On the other hand, a number of studies suggest that increased thrombogenic factors—either procoagulant or those that lead to high platelet reactivity—may be the primary risk factors in FH. Those individuals who die prematurely have either higher lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), higher factor VIII and/or higher fibrinogen compared with those with a normal lifespan, whereas their LDL-C does not differ. Conclusions: Many observational and experimental studies have demonstrated that high LDL-C cannot be the cause of premature cardiovascular mortality among people with FH. The number who die early is also much smaller than expected. Apparently, some individuals with FH may have inherited other, more important risk factors than a high LDL-C. In accordance with this, our review has shown that increased coagulation factors are the commonest cause, but there may be other ones as well.
Background
Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) more likely exhibits extensive atherosclerotic disease at multiple vascular beds. Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an atherogenic lipoprotein that elevates HeFH‐related atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risks. Whether circulating Lp(a) level associates with polyvascular propagation of atherosclerosis in subjects with HeFH remains uncertain.
Methods and Results
The current study analyzed 370 subjects with clinically diagnosed HeFH who received evaluation of systemic arteries. Polyvascular disease (polyVD) was defined as more than 2 coexisting atherosclerosis conditions including coronary artery disease, carotid stenosis, or peripheral artery disease. Clinical characteristics and lipid features were analyzed in subjects with HeFH and polyVD; 5.7% of patients with HeFH (21/370) had polyVD. They were more likely to have a clustering of risk factors, tendon ( P <0.001) and skin xanthomas ( P =0.004), and corneal arcus ( P =0.026). Furthermore, an elevated Lp(a) level ( P =0.006) and a greater frequency of Lp(a) level ≥50 mg/dL ( P <0.001) were observed in subjects with HeFH and polyVD. On multivariable analysis adjusting risk factors and lipid‐lowering agents, Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL (odds ratio [OR], 5.66 [95% CI, 1.68–19.0], P =0.005), age, and family history of premature coronary artery disease independently predicted polyVD in subjects with HeFH. Of note, the prevalence of polyVD rose to 33.3% in patients with HeFH and age >58 years old, family history of premature coronary artery disease, and Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL (OR, 10.3 [95% CI, 3.12–33.4], P <0.001).
Conclusions
An increased level of circulating Lp(a) levels predicted concomitance of polyVD in patients with HeFH. The current findings suggest subjects with HeFH and Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL as a high‐risk category who require meticulous screening of systemic vascular beds.
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a complex polymorphic lipoprotein comprised of a low-density lipoprotein particle with one molecule of apolipoprotein B100 and an additional apolipoprotein(a) connected through a disulfide bond. The serum concentration is mostly genetically determined and only modestly influenced by diet and other lifestyle modifications. In recent years it has garnered increasing attention due to its causal role in pre-mature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and calcific aortic valve stenosis, while novel effective therapeutic options are emerging [apolipoprotein(a) antisense oligonucleotides and ribonucleic acid interference therapy]. Bibliometric descriptive analysis and mapping of the research literature were made using Scopus built-in services. We focused on the distribution of documents, literature production dynamics, most prolific source titles, institutions, and countries. Additionally, we identified historical and influential papers using Reference Publication Year Spectrography (RPYS) and the CRExplorer software. An analysis of author keywords showed that Lp(a) was most intensively studied regarding inflammation, atherosclerosis, cardiovascular risk assessment, treatment options, and hormonal changes in post-menopausal women. The results provide a comprehensive view of the current Lp(a)-related literature with a specific interest in its role in calcific aortic valve stenosis and potential emerging pharmacological interventions. It will help the reader understand broader aspects of Lp(a) research and its translation into clinical practice.
Introduction:
Familial hypercholesterolemia is a genetic disorder characterized by elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) since birth and an exceedingly high risk of premature cardiovascular disease, especially in the homozygous form (HoFH). Despite the availability of effective cholesterol-lowering drugs, substantial LDL-C and cardiovascular risk reductions in these patients are still problematic, especially in those carrying mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene.
Areas covered:
Loss-of-function mutations in angiopoietin like-3 (ANGPTL3) encoding gene are associated with lower levels of LDL-C and reduced cardiovascular risk; the pharmacological inhibition of ANGPTL3 reduces LDL-C levels independently of LDLR. This approach can thus improve the treatment of HoFH using a monoclonal antibody targeting ANGPTL3 (evinacumab).
Expert opinion:
Most lipid-lowering agents available so far are insufficient to achieve an appropriate response in HoFH patients, who remain at very high cardiovascular risk. The inhibition of ANGPTL3 with evinacumab halves LDL-C levels in HoFH patients by an LDLR-independent mechanism. The results obtained so far have clearly indicated a promising improvement in the management of these patients. As the reduction of CV risk is proportional to the absolute reduction in LDL-C levels, we can expect that treatment with evinacumab, added to the maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy, will turn into a significant clinical benefit.
Cardiovascular diseases are still the leading cause of mortality due to increased atherosclerosis worldwide. In the background of accelerated atherosclerosis, the most important risk factors include hypertension, age, male gender, hereditary predisposition, diabetes, obesity, smoking and lipid metabolism disorder. Arterial stiffness is a firmly established, independent predictor of cardiovascular risk. Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia are at very high cardiovascular risk. Non-invasive measurement of arterial stiffness is suitable for screening vascular dysfunction at subclinical stage in this severe inherited disorder. Some former studies found stiffer arteries in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia compared to healthy controls, while statin treatment has a beneficial effect on it. If conventional drug therapy fails in patients with severe familial hypercholesterolemia, PCSK9 inhibitor therapy should be administered; if these agents are not available, performing selective LDL apheresis could be considered. The impact of recent therapeutic approaches on vascular stiffness is not widely studied yet, even though the degree of accelerated athero and arteriosclerosis correlates with cardiovascular risk. The authors provide an overview of the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia and the findings of studies on arterial dysfunction in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, in addition to presenting the latest therapeutic options and their effects on arterial elasticity parameters.
Purpose of Review
Familial hypercholesterolemia is a high cardiovascular risk disorder. We will review the role of lipoprotein(a) in cardiovascular risk and in aortic valve stenosis in familial hypercholesterolemia, as well as its association with their phenotype, and strategies to identify this high-risk population.
Recent Findings
Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia have higher lipoprotein(a) levels mainly due to an increased frequency of LPA variants, and the cardiovascular risk is increased twofolds when both conditions coexist. Also, an increased risk for aortic valve stenosis and valve replacement has been observed with high lipoprotein(a) levels. Assessment of lipoprotein(a) during the cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolemia is a good opportunity to identify this high-risk population.
Summary
High cardiovascular risk in familial hypercholesterolemia is increased even more when lipoprotein(a) is also elevated. Measurement of lipoprotein(a) in these patients is crucial to identify those subjects who need to intensify LDL-cholesterol reduction pending availability of lipoprotein(a)-specific treatments.
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disease characterized by high low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-c) concentrations that increase cardiovascular risk and cause premature death. The most frequent cause of the disease is a mutation in the LDL receptor (LDLR) gene. Diabetes is also associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. People with FH seem to be protected from developing diabetes, whereas cholesterol-lowering treatments such as statins are associated with an increased risk of the disease. One of the hypotheses to explain this is based on the toxicity of LDL particles on insulin-secreting pancreatic β-cells, and their uptake by the latter, mediated by the LDLR. A healthy lifestyle and a relatively low body mass index in people with FH have also been proposed as explanations. Its association with superimposed diabetes modifies the phenotype of FH, both regarding the lipid profile and cardiovascular risk. However, findings regarding the association and interplay between these two diseases are conflicting. The present review summarizes the existing evidence and discusses knowledge gaps on the matter.
Background
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) due to a founder variant in Apolipoprotein B (ApoB R3500Q ) is reported in 12% of the Pennsylvania Amish community. By studying a cohort of ApoB R3500Q heterozygotes and homozygotes, we aimed to characterize the biochemical and cardiac imaging features in children and young adults with a common genetic background and similar lifestyle.
Methods
We employed advanced lipid profile testing, carotid intima media thickness (CIMT), pulse wave velocity (PWV), and peripheral artery tonometry (PAT) to assess atherosclerosis in a cohort of Amish ApoB R3500Q heterozygotes (n = 13), homozygotes (n = 3), and their unaffected, age-matched siblings (n = 9). ApoB R3500Q homozygotes were not included in statistical comparisons.
Results
LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) was significantly elevated among ApoB R3500Q heterozygotes compared to sibling controls, though several ApoB R3500Q heterozygotes had LDL-C levels in the normal range. LDL particles (LDL-P), small, dense LDL particles, and ApoB were also significantly elevated among subjects with ApoB R3500Q . Despite these differences in serum lipids and particles, CIMT and PWV were not significantly different between ApoB R3500Q heterozygotes and controls in age-adjusted analysis.
Conclusions
We provide a detailed description of the serum lipids, atherosclerotic plaque burden, vascular stiffness, and endothelial function among children and young adults with FH due to heterozygous ApoB R3500Q . Fasting LDL-C was lower than what is seen with other forms of FH, and even normal in several ApoB R3500Q heterozygotes, emphasizing the importance of cascade genetic testing among related individuals for diagnosis. We found increased number of LDL particles among ApoB R3500Q heterozygotes but an absence of detectable atherosclerosis.
Aims
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in the general population. However, such a role in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is less documented. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between Lp(a) concentrations and ASCVD prevalence in adult patients with FH.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional study from the Hellenic Familial Hypercholesterolemia Registry (HELLAS-FH). Patients were categorized into 3 tertiles according to Lp(a) levels.
Results
A total of 541 adult patients (249 males) with possible/probable/definite FH heterozygous FH (HeFH) were included (mean age 48.5 ± 15.0 years at registration, 40.8 ± 15.9 years at diagnosis). Median (interquartile range) Lp(a) concentrations in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Lp(a) tertile were 6.4 (3.0–9.7), 22.4 (16.0–29.1) and 77.0 (55.0–102.0) mg/dL, respectively. There was no difference in lipid profile across Lp(a) tertiles. The overall prevalence of ASCVD was 9.4% in the first, 16.1% in the second and 20.6% in the third tertile (p = 0.012 among tertiles). This was also the case for premature ASCVD, with prevalence rates of 8.5, 13.4 and 19.8%, respectively (p = 0.010 among tertiles). A trend for increasing prevalence of coronary artery disease (8.3, 12.2 and 16.1%, respectively; p = 0.076 among tertiles) was also observed. No difference in the prevalence of stroke and peripheral artery disease was found across tertiles.
Conclusions
Elevated Lp(a) concentrations are significantly associated with increased prevalence of ASCVD in patients with possible/probable/definite HeFH.
Background
Imaging of subclinical atherosclerosis improves cardiovascular risk prediction on top of traditional risk factors. However, cardiovascular imaging is not universally available. This work aims to identify circulating proteins that could predict subclinical atherosclerosis.
Methods
Hypothesis-free proteomics was used to analyze plasma from 444 subjects from PESA cohort study (222 with extensive atherosclerosis on imaging, and 222 matched controls) at two timepoints (three years apart) for discovery, and from 350 subjects from AWHS cohort study (175 subjects with extensive atherosclerosis on imaging and 175 matched controls) for external validation. A selected three-protein panel was further validated by immunoturbidimetry in the AWHS population and in 2999 subjects from ILERVAS cohort study.
Findings
PIGR, IGHA2, APOA, HPT and HEP2 were associated with subclinical atherosclerosis independently from traditional risk factors at both timepoints in the discovery and validation cohorts. Multivariate analysis rendered a potential three-protein biomarker panel, including IGHA2, APOA and HPT. Immunoturbidimetry confirmed the independent associations of these three proteins with subclinical atherosclerosis in AWHS and ILERVAS. A machine-learning model with these three proteins was able to predict subclinical atherosclerosis in ILERVAS (AUC [95%CI]:0.73 [0.70–0.74], p < 1 × 10⁻⁹⁹), and also in the subpopulation of individuals with low cardiovascular risk according to FHS 10-year score (0.71 [0.69–0.73], p < 1 × 10⁻⁶⁹).
Interpretation
Plasma levels of IGHA2, APOA and HPT are associated with subclinical atherosclerosis independently of traditional risk factors and offers potential to predict this disease. The panel could improve primary prevention strategies in areas where imaging is not available.
Purpose of Review
Individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia have very high risk of cardiovascular disease due to lifelong elevations in LDL cholesterol. Elevated lipoprotein(a) is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases such as myocardial infarction and aortic valve stenosis. It has been proposed to include elevated lipoprotein(a) in the diagnosis of clinical familial hypercholesterolemia.
Recent Findings
Lipoprotein(a) is co-measured in LDL cholesterol, and up to one-quarter of all diagnoses of clinical familial hypercholesterolemia are due to high levels of lipoprotein(a). Further, individuals with both familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated lipoprotein(a) have an extremely high risk of myocardial infarction.
Summary
We discuss the background for familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated lipoprotein(a) as risk factors for cardiovascular disease and the consequences of the fact that LDL cholesterol measurements/calculations include the cholesterol present in lipoprotein(a). Finally, we discuss the potential of including lipoprotein(a) as part of the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia and in consequence possible treatments.
Background
Recaticimab (SHR-1209, a humanized monoclonal antibody against PCSK9) showed robust LDL-C reduction in healthy volunteers. This study aimed to further assess the efficacy and safety of recaticimab in patients with hypercholesterolemia.
Methods
In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1b/2 trial, patients receiving stable dose of atorvastatin with an LDL-C level of 2.6 mmol/L or higher were randomized in a ratio of 5:1 to subcutaneous injections of recaticimab or placebo at different doses and schedules. Patients were recruited in the order of 75 mg every 4 weeks (75Q4W), 150Q8W, 300Q12W, 150Q4W, 300Q8W, and 450Q12W. The primary endpoint was percentage change in LDL-C from the baseline to end of treatment (i.e., at week 16 for Q4W and Q8W schedule and at week 24 for Q12W schedule).
Results
A total of 91 patients were enrolled and received recaticimab and 19 received placebo. The dose of background atorvastatin in all 110 patients was 10 or 20 mg/day. The main baseline LDL-C ranged from 3.360 to 3.759 mmol/L. The least-squares mean percentage reductions in LDL-C from baseline to end of treatment relative to placebo for recaticimab groups at different doses and schedules ranged from −48.37 to −59.51%. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred. The most common TEAEs included upper respiratory tract infection, increased alanine aminotransferase, increased blood glucose, and increased gamma-glutamyltransferase.
Conclusion
Recaticimab as add-on to moderate-intensity statin therapy significantly and substantially reduced the LDL-C level with an infrequent administration schedule (even given once every 12 weeks), compared with placebo.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03944109
Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is a genetic disorder that elevates low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increases the risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, despite their atherogenic lipid profiles, the cardiovascular risk of HeFH varies in each individual. Their variety of phenotypic features suggests the need for better risk stratification to optimize their therapeutic management. The current review summarizes three potential approaches, including (1) definition of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH)-related risk scores, (2) genetic analysis, and (3) biomarkers. The International Atherosclerosis Society has recently proposed a definition of severe FH to identify very high-risk HeFH subjects according to their clinical characteristics. Furthermore, published studies have shown the association of FH-related genetic phenotypes with ASCVD, which indicates the genetic analysis's potential to evaluate individual cardiovascular risks. Biomarkers reflecting disease activity have been considered to predict the formation of atherosclerosis and the occurrence of ASCVD in HeFH subjects. Incorporating these risk stratifications will be expected to allocate adequate intensity of lipid-lowering therapies in HeFH subjects, which ultimately improves cardiovascular outcomes.
Increased lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels are an independent predictor of coronary artery disease (CAD), degenerative aortic stenosis (DAS), and heart failure independent of CAD and DAS. Lp(a) levels are genetically determinated in an autosomal dominant mode, with great intra-and inter-ethnic diversity. Most variations in Lp(a) levels arise from genetic variations of the gene that encodes the apolipoprotein(a) component of Lp(a), the LPA gene. LPA is located on the long arm of chromosome 6, within region 6q2.6-2.7. Lp(a) levels increase cardiovascular risk through several unrelated mechanisms. Lp(a) quantitatively carries all of the atherogenic risk of low-density lipo-protein cholesterol, although it is even more prone to oxidation and penetration through endothelia to promote the production of foam cells. The thrombogenic properties of Lp(a) result from the ho-mology between apolipoprotein(a) and plasminogen, which compete for the same binding sites on endothelial cells to inhibit fibrinolysis and promote intravascular thrombosis. LPA has up to 70% homology with the human plasminogen gene. Oxidized phospholipids promote differentiation of pro-inflammatory macrophages that secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines (e. g., interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α). The aim of this review is to define which of these mechanisms of Lp(a) is predominant in different groups of patients.
Introduction
The guidelines of management of dyslipidemias and prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) are based on firm scientific evidence obtained by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, the role of elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) level as a risk factor of CVD and therapies to lower LDL-C levels are frequently disputed by colleagues who disagree with the conclusions of the RCTs published. This review focuses on this dispute, and evaluates the current approach of management of dyslipidemias and CVD prevention to be able to find modern alternatives that allow a more precise diagnosis and therapy of dyslipidemic patients.
Areas covered
The recent interest in lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and remnants lipoproteins and in therapies that do not influence LDL-C levels primarily, such as anti-inflammatory drugs and icosapent ethyl, has revitalized our concern to optimize the care for patients with increased CVD risk without focusing simply on reduction of LDL-C by therapy with statins, ezitemibe, and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors.
Expert Opinion
The limited characterization of study populations by measurement of total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) followed by measurement or calculation of LDL-C should be extended by a more integral approach in order to realize precision diagnostics and precision medicine, for the sake of personalized patient care.
Introduction
Vascular access is required for hemodialysis treatment. An effect of activated protein C resistance on access thrombosis rates has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study is to determine whether an activated protein C resistance is correlated with the patency of polytetrafluoroethylene arteriovenous grafts.
Methods
The primary endpoint was the impact of activated protein C resistance; secondary endpoints were the influence of Factor V Leiden thrombophilia, homocysteine, ß2-glycoprotein antibodies, and other laboratory values on the assisted primary patency.
Results
Forty-three grafts in 43 patients were included. The overall mean assisted primary patency was 18.4 months (±3.16 SE). Activated protein C resistance (p = 0.01) and ß2-glycoprotein antibodies (p = 0.018) had a significant influence on the assisted primary patency. The assisted primary patency for patients with low (<4) activated protein C resistance was 9.3 months compared to 24.8 of those with a high (≥4) activated protein C resistance. Patients with low (≤2.6) ß2-glycoprotein antibodies presented an assisted primary patency of 31.8 months whereas those with high (>2.6) ß2-glycoprotein antibodies showed 9.3 months. In all patients with a pathologic activated protein C resistance, a heterozygous or homozygous Factor V Leiden thrombophilia was detected.
Conclusions
This study identified low activated protein C resistance and high ß2-glycoprotein antibodies as risk factors for thrombosis in polytetrafluoroethylene arteriovenous grafts. A prospective study is needed to clarify if oral anticoagulation should be administered to all patients with a pathologic activated protein C resistance blood value and/or factor V Leiden mutation.
Background
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) confers a greatly increased risk for premature cardiovascular disease (CVD), but remains very under-diagnosed and under-treated in primary care populations. We assessed whether using a hybrid model consisting of two existing FH diagnostic criteria coupled with electronic medical record (EMR) data, would accurately identify patients with FH in a midwest US metropolitan healthcare system.
Methods and Results
We conducted a retrospective, records-based, cross-sectional study using datasets from unique EMRs of living patients. Using Structured Query Language (SQL) to identify components of two currently approved FH diagnostic criteria, we created a hybrid model to identify individuals with FH. Of 264 264 records analyzed, between 794 and 1571 patients were identified as having FH based on the hybrid diagnostic model, with a prevalence of 1:300 to 1:160. These patients had a higher prevalence of premature coronary artery disease (CAD) (38%-58%) compared with the general population (1.8%) and compared with those having a high CAD risk, but no FH (10%). Although most patients were receiving lipid-lowering therapies (LLT), only 50% were receiving guideline-recommended high-intensity LLT.
Conclusion
Using the hybrid model, we identified FH with a higher clinical and genetic detection rate compared with using standard diagnostic criteria, individually. Statin and other LLT use were suboptimal and below guideline recommendations. Because FH under-diagnosis and under-treatment are due partially to the challenges of implementing existing diagnostic criteria in a primary care setting, this hybrid model potentially can improve FH diagnosis and subsequent early access to appropriate treatment.
Changes in plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels relate to a high risk of developing some common and complex diseases. LDL-c, as a quantitative trait, is multifactorial and depends on both genetic and environmental factors. In the pregenomic age, targeted genes were used to detect genetic factors in both hyper- and hypolipidemias, but this approach only explained extreme cases in the population distribution. Subsequently, the genetic basis of the less severe and most common dyslipidemias remained unknown. In the genomic age, performing whole-exome sequencing in families with extreme plasma LDL-c values identified some new candidate genes, but it is unlikely that such genes can explain the majority of inexplicable cases. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified several single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) associated with plasma LDL-c, introducing the idea of a polygenic origin. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs), including LDL-c-raising alleles, were developed to measure the contribution of the accumulation of small-effect variants to plasma LDL-c. This paper discusses other possibilities for unexplained dyslipidemias associated with LDL-c, such as mosaicism, maternal effect, and induced epigenetic changes. Future studies should consider gene–gene and gene–environment interactions and the development of integrated information about disease-driving networks, including phenotypes, genotypes, transcription, proteins, metabolites, and epigenetics.
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most frequent inherited disorder associated with premature coronary artery disease. Early identification and treatment of patients will reduce cardiovascular outcomes. Identification of index cases and then cascade testing in first-degree relatives using lipid levels and genetic test is the most cost-effective strategy implemented in some countries. FH patients are considered at high cardiovascular risk. Imaging techniques such as coronary computed tomography angiography could identify subjects that will require more intensive treatments. Recent guidelines recommend an LDL-C below 100 mg/dl or at least 50% LDL-C reduction if the first goal is not attained as treatment targets in heterozygous FH. Statins are the first-line agents in almost all patients, and several options exist to obtain larger LDL-C reductions like the addition of ezetimibe and/or colesevelam. Novel agents like microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitors, apolipoprotein B100 antisense or PCSK9-specific monoclonal antibodies, if approved by regulatory agencies, will reduce LDL-C levels and potentially reduce cardiovascular risk in homozygous and severe heterozygous FH patients.
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients are at high risk for premature coronary heart disease (CHD). Despite the use of statins, most patients do not achieve an optimal LDL-cholesterol goal. The aims of this study are to describe baseline characteristics and to evaluate Lipid Lowering Therapy (LLT) in FH patients recruited in SAFEHEART.
A cross-sectional analysis of cases recruited in the Spanish FH cohort at inclusion was performed. Demographic, lifestyle, medical and therapeutic data were collected by specific surveys. Blood samples for lipid profile and DNA were obtained. Genetic test for FH was performed through DNA-microarray. Data from 1852 subjects (47.5% males) over 19 years old were analyzed: 1262 (68.1%, mean age 45.6 years) had genetic diagnosis of FH and 590 (31.9%, mean age 41.3 years) were non-FH. Cardiovascular disease was present in 14% of FH and in 3.2% of non-FH subjects (P < 0.001), and was significantly higher in patients carrying a null mutation compared with those carrying a defective mutation (14.87% vs. 10.6%, respectively, P < 0.05). Prevalence of current smokers was 28.4% in FH subjects. Most FH cases were receiving LLT (84%). Although 51.5% were receiving treatment expected to reduce LDL-c levels at least 50%, only 13.6% were on maximum statin dose combined with ezetimibe. Mean LDL-c level in treated FH cases was 186.5 mg/dl (SD: 65.6) and only 3.4% of patients reached and LDL-c under 100 mg/dl. The best predictor for LDL-c goal attainment was the use of combined therapy with statin and ezetimibe.
Although most of this high risk population is receiving LLT, prevalence of cardiovascular disease and LDL-c levels are still high and far from the optimum LDL-c therapeutic goal. However, LDL-c levels could be reduced by using more intensive LLT such as combined therapy with maximum statin dose and ezetimibe.
The aims of the study were, first, to critically evaluate lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a cardiovascular risk factor and, second, to advise on screening for elevated plasma Lp(a), on desirable levels, and on therapeutic strategies.
The robust and specific association between elevated Lp(a) levels and increased cardiovascular disease (CVD)/coronary heart disease (CHD) risk, together with recent genetic findings, indicates that elevated Lp(a), like elevated LDL-cholesterol, is causally related to premature CVD/CHD. The association is continuous without a threshold or dependence on LDL- or non-HDL-cholesterol levels. Mechanistically, elevated Lp(a) levels may either induce a prothrombotic/anti-fibrinolytic effect as apolipoprotein(a) resembles both plasminogen and plasmin but has no fibrinolytic activity, or may accelerate atherosclerosis because, like LDL, the Lp(a) particle is cholesterol-rich, or both. We advise that Lp(a) be measured once, using an isoform-insensitive assay, in subjects at intermediate or high CVD/CHD risk with premature CVD, familial hypercholesterolaemia, a family history of premature CVD and/or elevated Lp(a), recurrent CVD despite statin treatment, ≥3% 10-year risk of fatal CVD according to European guidelines, and/or ≥10% 10-year risk of fatal + non-fatal CHD according to US guidelines. As a secondary priority after LDL-cholesterol reduction, we recommend a desirable level for Lp(a) <80th percentile (less than ∼50 mg/dL). Treatment should primarily be niacin 1-3 g/day, as a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled intervention trials demonstrates reduced CVD by niacin treatment. In extreme cases, LDL-apheresis is efficacious in removing Lp(a).
We recommend screening for elevated Lp(a) in those at intermediate or high CVD/CHD risk, a desirable level <50 mg/dL as a function of global cardiovascular risk, and use of niacin for Lp(a) and CVD/CHD risk reduction.
Circulating concentration of lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]), a large glycoprotein attached to a low-density lipoprotein-like particle, may be associated with risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke.
To assess the relationship of Lp(a) concentration with risk of major vascular and nonvascular outcomes.
Long-term prospective studies that recorded Lp(a) concentration and subsequent major vascular morbidity and/or cause-specific mortality published between January 1970 and March 2009 were identified through electronic searches of MEDLINE and other databases, manual searches of reference lists, and discussion with collaborators.
Individual records were provided for each of 126,634 participants in 36 prospective studies. During 1.3 million person-years of follow-up, 22,076 first-ever fatal or nonfatal vascular disease outcomes or nonvascular deaths were recorded, including 9336 CHD outcomes, 1903 ischemic strokes, 338 hemorrhagic strokes, 751 unclassified strokes, 1091 other vascular deaths, 8114 nonvascular deaths, and 242 deaths of unknown cause. Within-study regression analyses were adjusted for within-person variation and combined using meta-analysis. Analyses excluded participants with known preexisting CHD or stroke at baseline.
Lipoprotein(a) concentration was weakly correlated with several conventional vascular risk factors and it was highly consistent within individuals over several years. Associations of Lp(a) with CHD risk were broadly continuous in shape. In the 24 cohort studies, the rates of CHD in the top and bottom thirds of baseline Lp(a) distributions, respectively, were 5.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4-5.9) per 1000 person-years and 4.4 (95% CI, 4.2-4.6) per 1000 person-years. The risk ratio for CHD, adjusted for age and sex only, was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.11-1.22) per 3.5-fold higher usual Lp(a) concentration (ie, per 1 SD), and it was 1.13 (95% CI, 1.09-1.18) following further adjustment for lipids and other conventional risk factors. The corresponding adjusted risk ratios were 1.10 (95% CI, 1.02-1.18) for ischemic stroke, 1.01 (95% CI, 0.98-1.05) for the aggregate of nonvascular mortality, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.97-1.04) for cancer deaths, and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.95-1.06) for nonvascular deaths other than cancer.
Under a wide range of circumstances, there are continuous, independent, and modest associations of Lp(a) concentration with risk of CHD and stroke that appear exclusive to vascular outcomes.
Serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels were significantly higher in 89 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) (geometric mean, 22.7 mg/dl) than in 109 normocholesterolemic controls (10.0 mg/dl, p less than 0.05) and 40 controls (9.1 mg/dl, p less than 0.05) with similarly elevated low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels due to other primary hypercholesterolemias. To provide further evidence that the increased serum Lp(a) concentration was due to inheritance of the FH gene, 24 unaffected first-degree relatives were compared with their FH probands. Serum Lp(a) in affected individuals was significantly greater than in unaffected relatives (geometric means, 26.5 versus 13.7 mg/dl, respectively; p less than 0.05). Family membership exerted an effect on serum Lp(a) concentrations, indicating that other genetic influences were also operating, as is known to be the case in general populations. Serum Lp(a) in 30 of the FH patients, who had coronary heart disease, was not significantly different from 30 age- and sex-matched controls with FH but with coronary heart disease (geometric means, 23.6 versus 24.7 mg/dl, respectively). FH is associated with an increase in serum Lp(a). Elevated serum Lp(a) concentrations should probably now be regarded as a component of the clinical syndrome of FH. However, within our FH population Lp(a) did not distinguish those with clinically overt coronary heart disease from those without the disease.
Plasma lipids, lipoproteins, and lipoprotein[a] (Lp[a]) levels were determined in 216 members of 14 families with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Ninety-nine subjects harbored a mutant low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor allele as confirmed by molecular genetic analysis. Four different mutant alleles were identified, each in a defined genetic group, Druze, Christian-Arabs, and Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews. The findings in FH subjects (cases) were compared with their nonaffected family members (controls). Plasma Lp[a] levels increased with age in the controls but not in cases and were different among the four genetic groups. Mean plasma Lp[a] levels were significantly higher in cases (33 mg/dl) than in controls (22 mg/dl). Plasma LDL cholesterol levels were raised in cases of the four genetic groups to a similar extent, in contrast to the mean plasma Lp[a] that varied. The Lp[a] level was higher by 30-33% in cases from the Druze, Christian-Arabs, and Jewish-Ashkenazi groups but by 110% in the Jewish-Sephardic group. Apo[a] isoform distribution was similar in cases and controls within each genetic group. Lp[a] levels were highest in subjects with LpS1 isoform, in particular in cases from the Jewish-Sephardic group. These data indicate that the higher Lp[a] levels in FH heterozygotes cannot be attributed solely to lack of functional LDL receptor molecules but possibly reflect multiple gene interactions.
The lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] contains two nonidentical protein species, apolipoprotein (apo) B-100 and a specific high molecular weight glycoprotein, apo(a). Lp(a) represents a continuous quantitative genetic trait, the genetics of which are only poorly understood. Genetic variation at the apo(a) locus affects plasma Lp(a) levels and explains at least 40% of the variability of this trait. Lp(a) levels were found to be elevated 3-fold in the plasma from patients with the heterozygous form of familial hypercholesterolemia who have one mutant low density lipoprotein receptor gene. This elevation was not due to a higher frequency of those apo(a) types that are associated with high Lp(a) levels in familial hypercholesterolemia patients. Rather Lp(a) levels were elevated for each of the apo(a) phenotypes examined. The effects of the apo(a) and low density lipoprotein receptor genes on Lp(a) levels are not additive but multiplicative. This is a situation not commonly considered in quantitative human genetics. We conclude that Lp(a) levels in plasma may be determined by variation at more than one gene locus.
Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a complex in human plasma assembled from low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)). High plasma concentrations of Lp(a) are a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) in particular in patients with concomitant elevation of LDL. We have analysed for elevated Lp(a) levels in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), a condition caused by mutations in the LDL receptor (LDLR) gene and characterised by high LDL, xanthomatosis and premature CHD. To avoid possible confusion by the apo(a) gene which is the major quantitative trait locus controlling Lp(a) in the population at large, we used a sib pair approach based on genotype information for both the LDLR and the apo(a) gene. We analysed 367 family members of 30 South African and 30 French Canadian index patients with FH for LDLR mutations and for apo(a) genotype. Three lines of evidence showed a significant effect of FH on Lp(a) levels: (1) Lp(a) values were significantly higher in FH individuals compared to non-FH relatives (p < 0.001), although the distribution of apo(a) alleles was not different in the two groups; (2) comparison of Lp(a) concentrations in 28 sib pairs, identical by descent (i.b.d.) at the apo(a) locus but non-identical for LDLR status, extracted from this large sample demonstrated significantly elevated Lp(a) concentrations in sibs with FH (p < 0.001); (3) single i.b.d. apo(a) alleles were associated with significantly higher Lp(a) concentrations (p < 0.0001) in FH than non-FH family members. Variability in associated Lp(a) levels also depended on FH status and was highest when i.b.d. alleles were present in FH subjects and lowest when present in non-FH individuals. The study demonstrates that sib pair analysis makes it possible to detect the effect of a minor gene in the presence of the effect of a major gene. Given the interactive effect of elevated LDL and high Lp(a) on CHD risk our data suggest that elevated Lp(a) may add to the CHD risk in FH subjects.
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a quantitative genetic trait that in the general population is largely controlled by 1 major locus-the locus for the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene. Sibpair studies in families including familial defective apolipoprotein B or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) heterozygotes have demonstrated that, in addition, mutations in apolipoprotein B and in the LDL receptor (LDL-R) gene may affect Lp(a) plasma concentrations, but this issue is controversial. Here, we have further investigated the influence of mutations in the LDL-R gene on Lp(a) levels by inclusion of FH homozygotes. Sixty-nine members of 22 families with FH were analyzed for mutations in the LDL-R as well as for apo(a) genotypes, apo(a) isoforms, and Lp(a) plasma levels. Twenty-six individuals were found to be homozygous for FH, and 43 were heterozygous for FH. As in our previous analysis, FH heterozygotes had significantly higher Lp(a) than did non-FH individuals from the same population. FH homozygotes with 2 nonfunctional LDL-R alleles had almost 2-fold higher Lp(a) levels than did FH heterozygotes. This increase was not explained by differences in apo(a) allele frequencies. Phenotyping of apo(a) and quantitative analysis of isoforms in family members allowed the assignment of Lp(a) levels to both isoforms in apo(a) heterozygous individuals. Thus, Lp(a) levels associated with apo(a) alleles that were identical by descent could be compared. In the resulting 40 allele pairs, significantly higher Lp(a) levels were detected in association with apo(a) alleles from individuals with 2 defective LDL-R alleles compared with those with only 1 defective allele. This difference of Lp(a) levels between allele pairs was present across the whole size range of apo(a) alleles. Hence, mutations in the LDL-R demonstrate a clear gene-dosage effect on Lp(a) plasma concentrations.
The role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HFH) is unclear. We sought to examine the utility of this lipoprotein as a predictor of CVD outcomes in the HFH population at our lipid clinic.
This was a retrospective analysis of clinical and laboratory data from a large multiethnic cohort of HFH patients at a single, large lipid clinic in Vancouver, Canada. Three hundred and eighty-eight patients were diagnosed with possible, probable, or definite HFH by strict clinical diagnostic criteria. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to study the relationship between several established CVD risk factors, Lp(a), and the age of first hard CVD event.
An Lp(a) concentration of 800 units/L (560 mg/L) or higher was a significant independent risk factor for CVD outcomes [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.53-4.39; P < 0.001]. Other significant risk factors were male sex [HR = 3.19 (1.79-5.69); P < 0.001] and ratio of total to HDL-cholesterol [1.18 (1.07-1.30); P = 0.001]. A previous history of smoking or hypertension each produced HRs consistent with increased CVD risk [HR = 1.55 (0.92-2.61) and 1.57 (0.90-2.74), respectively], but neither reached statistical significance (both P = 0.10). LDL-cholesterol was not an independent predictor of CVD risk [HR = 0.85 (0.0.71-1.01); P = 0.07], nor was survival affected by the subcategory of HFH diagnosis (i.e., possible vs probable vs definite HFH).
Lp(a) is an independent predictor of CVD risk in a multiethnic HFH population.
Background
Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (hFH) is an inherited disorder commonlyfound among the general population. Premature cardiovascular disease, especially coronaryartery disease, is the most important complication in these patients. The aim of this studywas to analyze the clinical manifestations and the characteristics of cardiovascular disease inthe Spanish hFH population.
Patients and method
Analysis of 819 non-related cases (449 females and 370 males), with aclinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia, from 69 lipid clinics. Clinical and lipid profileat diagnosis along with personal and familial backgrounds related to cardiovascular diseasewere registered in a central database.
Results
Mean total cholesterol at diagnosis was 412 (87) mg/dl in women, and 400 (78)mg/dl in men (p = 0.049). HDL-c was higher in females than in males (57 [14] vs. 47.7[12.7] mg/dl, respectively, p < 0.0001). Xantomas were present in 22.5% of cases, and21.7% of subjects had evidence of premature cardiovascular disease which was more frequentin males than in females (30.8% and 14.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). In a multivariant analysis,a significant and positive correlation was observed between cardiovascular disease and age,gender, tobacco consumption, LDL-c levels, blood pressure and body mass index.
Conclusions
The clinical manifestations and the presence of cardiovascular disease in SpanishhFH patients are similar to those described in other populations. LDL-c levels, age, gender,smoking, hypertension and body mass index are important predictors of cardiovascular diseasein these patients.
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is caused by defects in genes coding for proteins involved in low density lipoprotein (LDL) metabolism, and is associated with increased risk of premature coronary heart disease (CHD). The clinical phenotype of FH exhibits marked variability due to additional metabolic and environmental factors, and further biomarkers are required for appropriate risk assessment. The aim of the present study was to search for risk markers among FH patients.
Clinical and biochemical parameters of FH subjects with early CHD events (CHD-susceptible) and FH subjects with late or no CHD events (CHD-resistant) were compared. Our data show that CHD-susceptible FH patients had significantly higher Lipoprotein (Lp) (a) levels compared to CHD-resistant FH patients. When subdividing by gender, the main findings were that (i) CHD-susceptible women had significantly higher levels of both Lp(a), low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and apolipoprotein (apo) B as compared to CHD-resistant women, and (ii) CHD-resistant women had significantly lower Lp(a) levels and higher high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and apoA-I levels compared to CHD-resistant men.
The data suggest that Lp(a) may be an important coronary risk marker in FH patients, in particular in combination with elevated LDL cholesterol levels among female subjects. Thus, measurement of Lp(a) levels may help identifying high-risk individuals who could benefit from an aggressive therapy, including statins to reduce LDL-cholesterol to guideline-recommended levels.
The aim of this study was to validate the Lipochip genetic diagnostic platform by assessing effectiveness, sensitivity, specificity and costs for the identification of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in Spain. This platform includes the use of a DNA micro array, the detection of large gene rearrangements and the complete resequencing of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene.
DNA samples of patients with clinically diagnosed FH were analyzed for mutations by application of the Lipochip platform. Results obtained were confirmed by DNA sequencing and MLPA analysis by two other, independent laboratories.
Of 808 patients tested, Lipochip detected a mutation in 66% of the cases and of these 78% were detected by the micro array. A specificity of 99.5% at a sensitivity of 99.8% was reached. A positive test result could be reported within 22 days after start of analysis. The total average screening costs of $350 per case were significantly lower compared to other existing screening programs.
Lipochip provides a reliable, fast and cheap alternative for the genetic testing of patients with clinically diagnosed FH.
Serum concentrations of apolipoprotein(a) were measured in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. The levels in 47 patients were a median of 2.5 times higher than those in controls matched for age and sex (240 [range 25-1245] vs 97 [7-1040] mg/l). Among patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia apo(a) levels were higher in those with (n = 48) than in those without (n = 72) ischaemic heart disease (283 [18-1245] vs 144 [7-741] mg/l); both in univariate and multivariate analysis serum apo(a) was the most significant variable distinguishing between the groups. Despite reducing LDL cholesterol by 30%, treatment with cholestyramine or pravastatin did not reduce apo(a) levels in these patients. These findings support the concept that apo(a) concentration is a genetic trait predisposing to ischaemic heart disease and imply that it may be useful in the identification of familial hypercholesterolaemia patients at high risk of coronary disease.
Familial hypercholesterolemia carries a marked increase in the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), but there is considerable variation between individuals in susceptibility to CHD. To investigate the possible role of lipoprotein(a) as a risk factor for CHD, we studied the association between serum lipoprotein(a) levels, genetic types of apolipoprotein(a) (which influence lipoprotein(a) levels), and CHD in 115 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. The median lipoprotein(a) level in the 54 patients with CHD was 57 mg per deciliter, which is significantly higher than the corresponding value of 18 mg per deciliter in the 61 patients without CHD. According to discriminant-function analysis, the lipoprotein(a) level was the best discriminator between the two groups (as compared with all other lipid and lipoprotein levels, age, sex, and smoking status). Phenotyping for apolipoprotein(a) was performed in 109 patients. The frequencies of the apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes and alleles differed significantly between the patients with and those without CHD. The allele LpS2, which is associated with high lipoprotein(a) levels, was found more frequently among the patients with CHD (0.33 vs. 0.12). In contrast, the LpS4 allele, which is associated with low lipoprotein(a) levels, was more frequent among those without CHD (0.27 vs. 0.15). We conclude that an elevated level of lipoprotein(a) is a strong risk factor for CHD in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, and the increase in risk is independent of age, sex, smoking status, and serum levels of total cholesterol, triglyceride, or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The higher level of lipoprotein(a) observed in the patients with CHD is the result of genetic influence.
The life experience of 104 patients with Summary Fredrickson's type-II hyperbetalipo-proteinæmia has been compared with 41 patients with hyperlipoproteinæmia associated with hypertriglyceridæmia (Fredrickson's types III, IV, and v hyperlipoproteinsemia). Of 21 male index patients with type-II hyperbetalipoproteinæmia 15 developed ischæmic heart-disease (I.H.D.) at mean age 42.7 years, and 2 have died. 20 out of 30 biochemically affected male relatives developed I.H.D. at mean age 43.8 years with 12 deaths. Of 23 female index patients 20 developed I.H.D. at mean age 48.4 years with 4 deaths. 9 out of 30 affected female relatives developed I.H.D. at mean age 57.1 years with 2 deaths. Of the group of 29 male index patients and 5 affected male relatives with types III, IV, and v hyperlipoproteinæmia, 12 developed at mean age 48.7 years, 10 having intermittent claudication and none have died. The 7 female patients are all alive, 5 developed I.H.D. at mean age sixty-five. For men with type-II hyperbetalipoproteinæmia the chance of a first attack of I.H.D. was 5.4% by age thirty, 51.4% by age fifty, and 85.4% by age sixty. For women the risks were 0, 12.2%, and 57.5% respectively. For men with types III, IV, and v hyperlipoproteinæmia the risks were lower (0, 30, and 53.3%) but the risk of peripheral vascular disease was increased.
Age at onset of clinically manifested coronary artery disease (CAD) varies widely among patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). A number of factors in addition to high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) have been suggested as predictors of risk among patients with FH, but a comprehensive examination of their utility is lacking. We therefore measured plasma lipids, carotid intima-medial thickness, and a variety of coronary risk factors in 262 patients with FH > or = 30 years old (68 of whom had premature CAD). Age (p < 0.0001) and gender were the most important determinants of premature CAD risk, with men having 5.64 times the risk of women (p < 0.0001). In addition, cigarette smoking (odds ratio [OR] 2.71, p = 0.026), smaller LDL as determined by the LDL cholesterol/LDL apolipoprotein B ratio (OR 2.60, p = 0.014), and white blood cell count (p = 0.014) were also statistically significant risk factors. Lipoprotein(a) and the presence of xanthoma were associated with risk only in very early coronary cases. After correction for age, carotid intima-media thickness was not associated with CAD risk. Insulin, fibrinogen, homocysteine, plasma C-reactive protein, and the angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism were unrelated to risk in this cohort. These results provide little justification for extensive investigation of risk factors among patients with FH, at least for the risk factors examined here. Rather, the inherent high LDL cholesterol of these patients should be the focus of preventive efforts. The novel finding of increased risk with smaller LDL may prove useful but needs further confirmation.
Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (hFH) is an inherited disorder commonly found among the general population. Premature cardiovascular disease, especially coronary artery disease, is the most important complication in these patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical manifestations and the characteristics of cardiovascular disease in the Spanish hFH population.
Analysis of 819 non-related cases (449 females and 370 males), with a clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia, from 69 lipid clinics. Clinical and lipid profile at diagnosis along with personal and familial backgrounds related to cardiovascular disease were registered in a central database.
Mean total cholesterol at diagnosis was 412 (87) mg/dl in women, and 400 (78) mg/dl in men (p = 0.049). HDL-c was higher in females than in males (57 [14] vs. 47.7 [12.7] mg/dl, respectively, p < 0.0001). Xantomas were present in 22.5% of cases, and 21.7% of subjects had evidence of premature cardiovascular disease which was more frequent in males than in females (30.8% and 14.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). In a multivariant analysis, a significant and positive correlation was observed between cardiovascular disease and age, gender, tobacco consumption, LDL-c levels, blood pressure and body mass index.
The clinical manifestations and the presence of cardiovascular disease in Spanish hFH patients are similar to those described in other populations. LDL-c levels, age, gender, smoking, hypertension and body mass index are important predictors of cardiovascular disease in these patients.
Patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) vary widely in terms of onset of cardiovascular disease (CVD).
The association between cardiovascular risk factors and prevalent CVD was examined in a cross-sectional study in order to elucidate their contribution to atherogenesis.
Patients were recruited from 37 Dutch Lipid Clinics. The diagnosis of FH was based on a uniform diagnostic protocol, confirmed by DNA analysis in 62% of the cases. All patients were investigated free from any lipid-lowering drug for at least 6 weeks.
Differences in lipids, lipoproteins and other risk factors for CVD were analysed in FH patients with and without CVD.
A total of 526 patients were assessed and more than 37% had a history of CVD with a mean age of onset of 46.8 years. Mean LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were severely elevated (8.38 +/- 2.13 mmol L-1). In univariate analysis, age, presence of hypertension or diabetes, body mass index, triglycerides (TG) and low HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) were all significantly associated with CVD. Also in multivariate analysis, all these risk factors, except TG and diabetes, were significantly linked to CVD.
A high CVD risk in this large well-documented characterized sample of FH patients is not only conferred by elevated LDL-C but also by low HDL-C.
Lipoprotein(a) has been proposed as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. This lipoprotein possesses a marked size polymorphism that makes difficult to measure accurately its concentration in plasma. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry recently recommended to carefully evaluate new commercial methods for lipoprotein(a) measurement to discard the possible influence of lipoprotein(a) isoforms on immunoreactivity. They also recommended to perform population-based studies for different ethnic and geographic groups. Therefore, in the evaluation of a fully automated, particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay for the measurement of lipoprotein(a) we have determined its reference interval in the Spanish population, an area with the lowest incidence of cardiovascular disease in Europe.
We evaluated a commercial kit of reagents calibrated against the Proposed Reference Material and determined the effect of lipoprotein(a) size polymorphism on the measurements. A population-based study was carried out in two different villages on the Mediterranean coast of Spain.
Imprecision at different lipoprotein(a) concentrations ranged between 3.0 and 15.4%. Recovery was 98.5 +/- 2.1. Detection limit was 4.8 nmol/L. There were no significant interferences from lipemia, jaundice, hemolysis, paraproteinemia, apolipoprotein B or plasminogen. We did not observe any effect of the lipoprotein(a) size polymorphism on the measurements. Mean (and SD) values for plasma lipoprotein(a) (n = 369) were 53.6 (65.3) nmol/L, the median was = 25.3 nmol/L and range varied between <4.8 and 356.0 nmol/L.
The present article presents an accurate and practical assay for measuring plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations and describes its reference values in a population of Spanish Caucasians. Our results are similar to those obtained in other Caucasian populations (between 10 and 25% higher than in participants of the CARDIA study).
To determine the contribution of classical risk factors to the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH).
A retrospective, multi-centre, cohort study. Extensive data were collected by scrutinizing medical records and the use of questionnaires. Multivariate Cox regression was used to study the relationship between potential risk factors and the occurrence of CVD.
We included 2400 FH patients from 27 Dutch lipid clinics. The diagnosis of FH was based upon the presence of a low-density lipoprotein receptor mutation or upon strict clinical criteria.
Cardiovascular mortality and CVD.
During 112.943 person-years, 782 (32.6%) patients had had at least one cardiovascular event. Male gender (RR 2.82, 95% CI 2.37-3.36), smoking (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.40-1.99), hypertension (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.06-1.75), diabetes mellitus (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.36-3.54), low HDL-C (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.15-1.63) and elevated lipoprotein(a) levels (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.20-1.79) proved to be independent CVD risk factors. These six risk factors explained 18.7% of the variation in the occurrence of CVD.
Male gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, HDL cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) levels proved to be important risk factors for CVD in FH patients. In addition to the routine institution of statin therapy, controlling these factors needs special attention in the management of this disorder.
Elevated lipoprotein(a) levels are associated with myocardial infarction (MI) in some but not all studies. Limitations of previous studies include lack of risk estimates for extreme lipoprotein(a) levels, measurements in long-term frozen samples, no correction for regression dilution bias, and lack of absolute risk estimates in the general population. We tested the hypothesis that extreme lipoprotein(a) levels predict MI in the general population, measuring levels shortly after sampling, correcting for regression dilution bias, and calculating hazard ratios and absolute risk estimates.
We examined 9330 men and women from the general population in the Copenhagen City Heart Study. During 10 years of follow-up, 498 participants developed MI. In women, multifactorially adjusted hazard ratios for MI for elevated lipoprotein(a) levels were 1.1 (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.9) for 5 to 29 mg/dL (22nd to 66th percentile), 1.7 (1.0 to 3.1) for 30 to 84 mg/dL (67th to 89th percentile), 2.6 (1.2 to 5.9) for 85 to 119 mg/dL (90th to 95th percentile), and 3.6 (1.7 to 7.7) for > or =120 mg/dL (>95th percentile) versus levels <5 mg/dL (<22nd percentile). Equivalent values in men were 1.5 (0.9 to 2.3), 1.6 (1.0 to 2.6), 2.6 (1.2 to 5.5), and 3.7 (1.7 to 8.0). Absolute 10-year risks of MI were 10% and 20% in smoking, hypertensive women aged >60 years with lipoprotein(a) levels of <5 and > or =120 mg/dL, respectively. Equivalent values in men were 19% and 35%.
We observed a stepwise increase in risk of MI with increasing levels of lipoprotein(a), with no evidence of a threshold effect. Extreme lipoprotein(a) levels predict a 3- to 4-fold increase in risk of MI in the general population and absolute 10-year risks of 20% and 35% in high-risk women and men.
To determine the effect of the type of mutation in low-density lipoprotein receptor gene and the risk factors associated with the development of premature cardiovascular disease (PCVD) in a large cohort of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (hFH) subjects with genetic diagnosis in Spain.
A cross-sectional study was conducted on 811 non-related FH patients (mean age 47.1+/-14 years, 383 males and 428 females) with a molecular defect in the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene from the Spanish National FH Register. Prevalence of PCVD was 21.9% (30.2% in males and 14.5% in women, P<0.001). Mean age of onset of cardiovascular event was 42.1 years in males and 50.8 years in females. Of those patients with PCVD, 59.5% of males and 27% of females suffered a second cardiovascular (CV) event. In multivariate analysis male gender, age, tobacco consumption (ever), and total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol (TC/HDL-C) ratio were significantly associated with PCVD. Two hundred and twenty different mutations were found with a large heterogeneity. Patients carrying null-mutations had significantly higher frequency of PCVD and recurrence of CV events. No relationship with Lp(a) levels and genotype of Apo E were found.
This study confirms the importance of identifying some classic risk factors such as smoking and TC/HDL-C ratio, and also the type of mutation in LDLR gene in order to implement early detection and intensive treatment for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in FH patients.
Plasma exchange has been shown to increase life-expectancy in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) but increasingly is being replaced by LDL apheresis. Several methods are now available for undertaking this procedure, which lowers LDL cholesterol and Lp(a) efficiently and safely when performed weekly or bi-weekly and causes only slight decreases in HDL cholesterol. Hitherto the main clinical indication has been homozygous FH, including children and pregnant women, but there are limited data showing that LDL apheresis has effects on the progression of cardiovascular disease in FH heterozygotes which are similar to those of maximal lipid-lowering drug therapy. Hence it has the potential to be beneficial in hypercholesterolaemic patients with overt coronary disease who are refractory to or intolerant of drugs. It is therefore recommended that LDL apheresis should be the treatment of choice for: (1) all FH homozygotes from the age of seven onwards unless their serum cholesterol can be reduced by >50% and/or decreased to <or=9mmol/l by drug therapy; (2) individual patients with either heterozygous FH or a bad family history of premature cardiac death whose coronary disease progresses and where LDL cholesterol remains >5.0mmol/l or is decreased by <40% with maximal drug therapy. Apheresis may also occasionally be indicated on a case-by-case basis for patients with lower levels of LDL. (3) LDL apheresis should also be considered for patients with aggressive progressing coronary disease and Lp(a)>60mg/l whose LDL cholesterol remains >3.2mmol/l despite maximal drug therapy.
Lipoprotein(a) as a potential causal genetic risk factor of cardiovascular disease: a rationale for increased efforts to
- Tsimikas S Hall
- Jl
Tsimikas S, Hall JL. Lipoprotein(a) as a potential causal genetic risk factor of cardiovascular disease: a rationale for increased efforts to
European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor: current status
- B G Nordestgaard
- M J Chapman
- K Ray
Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Ray K, et al. European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk
factor: current status. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2844-53.
Lipoprotein(a) as a potential causal genetic risk factor of cardiovascular disease: a rationale for increased efforts to understand its pathophysiology and develop targeted therapies
- Tsimikas
Tsimikas S, Hall JL. Lipoprotein(a) as a potential causal genetic risk
factor of cardiovascular disease: a rationale for increased efforts to understand its pathophysiology and develop targeted therapies. J Am Coll
Cardiol 2012;60: 716-21.
Scientific Steering Committee on behalf of the Simon Broome Register Group. The risk of fatal coronary heart disease in familial hypercholesterolemia
Scientific Steering Committee on behalf of the Simon Broome Register
Group. The risk of fatal coronary heart disease in familial hypercholesterolemia. BMJ 1991;3030:893-6.
Familial hypercholesterolemia The Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited DiseaseVol. II
- Jl Goldstein
- Hh Hobbs
- Ms Brown
- Cr Scriver
- Al Beaudet
- Ws Sly
- D Valle
Lipoprotein(a) in Familial Hypercholesterolemia
REFERENCES
1. Goldstein JL, Hobbs HH, Brown MS. Familial hypercholesterolemia.
In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, editors. The Metabolic
and Molecular Basis of Inherited DiseaseVol. II. New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill; 2001:2863–913.
Familial hypercholesterolemia
- Goldstein
European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor: current status
- Nordestgaard
Recommendations for the use of LDL apheresis
- Thompson