The Lesser Kestrel experienced steep population declines in the second half of the 20th century. The main cause for this decline in breeding grounds has been habitat degradation, provoked by agricultural intensifi cation and associated land use changes.
The replacement of grazed grasslands, extensive dry cereal and pulses with taller and denser crops (e.g. sunfl ower, maize, vineyards and other perennial crops) has lead to two important effects: the reduction of large insects abundance and the decrease of access to prey. The use of pesticides reduced further prey populations. Some formerly declining populations (e.g. in France and in the Iberian Peninsula) have now increased following the
implementation of conservation measures. Its breeding population seems to be stable and even growing now, especially in SW Europe, with an approximate estimate for the European breeding range of 30,500-38,000 pairs. Spain holds the most important
breeding population in Europe, followed by Italy and Greece. In Italy, the breeding population in the 90’s was of 1,300-1,500 pairs, but recently the species has shown a numerical increase and an extension of the breeding area.
The Action Plan has updated the knowledge about distribution and size of
Italian populations of Lesser Kestrel, now estimated in 6,600-9,200 pairs
and nesting in Lombardy, Emilia-Romagna, Lazio, Molise, Basilicata, Apulia, Calabria, Sardinia and Sicily.
The Plan examines threats and limiting factors in Italy of which at least 12
were found to have a high impact on reproductive success and population
density of the Lesser Kestrel leading to a lack of trophic availability (use of
pesticides and other food chain pollutants, loss of trophic habitat and of
trophic habitat structural complexity), higher energy costs for foraging activity
(development of infrastructure and expansion of built-up areas, enlargement
of irrigation systems, afforestation of marginal areas, overgrazing), poor
accessibility to prey (replacement of steppe areas and traditional cereal
crops with different higher, dense and/or permanent cultivations), loss of
nests sites (collapses of farm buildings, renovations of farm and historic
urban buildings, procedures of ban on the access to historic urban buildings
for hygienic reasons, abandonment of the maintenance of artifi cial nests
installed due to a lack of funds).
Loss of sites of pre-migratory roost produces a high decrease of fi tness in
critical periods and then increase of individual mortality in long-term period,
while actual lack of knowledge and consequent impossibility to preserve
migration routes, stop-over sites (roosts) and wintering areas can hinder
conservation measures.
Fitness decrease of the principal nesting and wintering areas, caused
by the climate change in place, determines a high increase of youth
mortality pre- and post-fl edging.
As well as threats and limiting factors above mentioned, the plan
identifies and describes additional threats that appear likely to have a
medium and low impact.
Finally, various actions have been identifi ed in order to achieve the
purpose of the plan, which is to improve the status of the Lesser Kestrel
and in particular:
• to have a stable and possibly growing Italian population of Lesser Kestrel
over the next 10 years and more specifi cally: a) to maintain the largest
populations and those that are currently in a safe state of conservation
(Basilicata, Apulia and Sicily); b) to consolidate the rise of the smallest
populations (Sardinia), c) to increase the population of recent settlements
(Lombardy, Emilia- Romagna, Lazio, Molise and Calabria);
• to increase the breeding area by favouring the recolonization of previously
abandoned areas, the colonization of new potentially suitable areas through
the improvement of their habitats and the overcoming of any existing and
hindering obstacles for the establishment of Lesser Kestrel (scarcity of
reproductive sites, excessive anthropic disturbance, etc.).